Thanks for the Video, but I think at minute 09:46, the transition should be ({q1, q2, q3}, a) --> {q0, q3, q4, q5} instead. Because we have an epsilon transition from "q2" itself which leads to "q3" directly and allows a "a" transition from "q2" to "q4". Please tell me if I'm mistaking.
![[Live] : ONE 168 วันนี้!! "โจนาธาน vs ซุปเปอร์เล็ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jIN65KgJsI/mqdefault.jpg)
Next video! Showing that minimal NFAs are not unique: th-cam.com/video/Nyzwq4CA3KE/w-d-xo.html
Omg, this video legit saved my life
You're welcome!
Your videos literally saved my life! Great explanations :)
Thanks for the Video, but I think at minute 09:46, the transition should be ({q1, q2, q3}, a) --> {q0, q3, q4, q5} instead. Because we have an epsilon transition from "q2" itself which leads to "q3" directly and allows a "a" transition from "q2" to "q4". Please tell me if I'm mistaking.
I was wondering the same thing
Very helpful thank you
cool video I really liked it
10:53 doesnt q5 go when on a to q2 and q3 ?
what if the nfa has more than 1 starting states?
One way around it is to make a new start state that epsilon-transitions into the set of (former) starting states.