He just explains the proces of making wafer’s. And if you dont know what a wafer is.. its the father of microchips. One of those first steps of creating microchips. If i’m wrong, please comment !
Finally, I saw a bunch of videos showing the steps of building a microchip, but none explained to me how a machine was able to manipulate these tiny objects, finally this one explained, with light and chemicals, not with "physical" parts!
Thanks alot Jae-Hwang Lee♥️♥️ Thumbs up!! You are great, shame to those disliking a video like this. Please continue to add more videos like this on the process of transistors/processor production. You the great♥️
Thank you very much for the video. Could you tell me what are the possible causes of stitching lines? why some lith machine macke stitching line during the lith process an other machines dont have this problem? thank you very much!!!!!
Well certainly size matters but 3D printing isn't going to solve Moore's Law issue (at least not permanently); circuit boards components are reaching atomic level.
That substrate in that visualization is the same thing as the silicone right? In MEMS technology it's all about the silicone. The substate is cut from silicone. And all etching is happening to that silicone substrate wafer. They're not different things. Correct me if i'm wrong
in 1984 and 1985 the company i did final assembly of semiconductor manufacturing equipment for, received processed wafers that had not passed QC to use as test wafers from customers that bought their products. With the developed wafers it could be seen that the circuitry was inside not on top of the wafer. The chemicals had penetrated wafer in each step. Nothing was on the wafer surface. Maybe like stained glass is not like painted glass. My guess is the glass is porous as far as glass stain is concerned. And wafers were porous as far as the chemicals used for them then,
Masks can be big, the light focuses after it passes the mask, so the images are small, like in a camera, a quarter inch cmos captures however wide and far a scene you like.
Semiconductor manufacturing equipment of the mid 1980s was used to spin the wafer as chemical streams or sprays were applied to create the layered images inside. Dopants altered the silica atomic structure to create N or P type properties that in the end left an electronic circuit inside a little square of glass called a fragment that was about the size of a square seen with 1/4 inch graph paper. Photoresist made possible the etching away of doped areas inside the thin glass like wafer. N and P type areas combined formed transistors in the maybe thousands or hundred or hundreds of thousands in tiny areas thanks to a microfiche mask used to expose the photoresist for the etching processes. Like one photograph negative sandwiched between two pieces of glass the mask was. But there were maybe about 200 little square identical images in each maybe 4 inch mask. Protected from contaminants and friction in between the two pieces of glass the film photograph negative was safe to use over and over. But special equipment was used to cleanse the mask to increase yield. Else too many of those little squares would be faulty and not an effective micro miniaturized circuit inside that black rectangular computer chip.
Silicone is a resistor, right? So making groves into the silicone by photolithography and/or etched away is the paths where electrons ie current would travel through? Would the electrons travel up and down from the grooves to the substrate or along the groves that were etched away?
Maybe I misunderstood you, but there's a difference between silicone (a resistor), and silicon (a semi conductor) which is used as the base for the microchips.
Please, any wise person to ask some questions? What "silicon" is exactly, i know there are p-type & n-type, this "silicon" is the opposite type of the substrate? How is a mask of one single transistor?
Wow. Okay. I'm writing a comedy magic show for JSR Micro and this will help in creating the script. ... Silk through phone could be the cleaning process...
4:38 shorter wavelength of light generate a lower resolution ? From that formula shown obviously the higher wavelength will produce better resolution. BTW it's a good explanation thanks.
The formula is good. Resolution in this case is defined as feature size. Smaller feature size is better. Smaller wavelength means smaller feature size.
@@vibodhj349 he didn't contradict himself. He was asking for a clarification because he assumed that he spotted a contradiction. The first sentence was him quoting the video; I'm guessing the lack of quotation marks confused you.
shorter wavelengths of light generate a higher resolution?? the shorter the wavelength the more precise the image... like you said they shortened the wavelength from 365nm to smaller wavelengths, to improve resolution. overall great concise and effective video though
Instead of R~λ/NA, R should be replaced with minimum feature size (CD) so CD~λ/NA so if the wavelength increases the minimum feature size increases and if the wavelength decreases ( frequency increases) and the minimum feature size decreases so smaller patterns can be put on the photoresist layer.
@@psun256 resolution and minimum feature size are inversely proportional. if your resolution increases (think a nice tv) then things aren't blurry and you can see more distinct objects even if they're smaller ( smaller min feature size)
I am really at wrong uni, my knowledge and interests are much above that uni tries to teach me. But what I could do, my country screwd up educational system so much that my only choice was some bad university
Hopefully someone with the expertise and knowledge can help me here I cannot find my answers anywhere... I have been tasked to produce a power point on LED manufacturing and its requirement for vacuum. id be forever grateful for any the answers to any of these questions I've watched endless videos on TH-cam. Thanks in advance. The questions are: 1)A wide variety of systems used in LED manufacture require a certain level of vacuum pressure, what is the necessity for vacuum in this environment? 2) what are the various methods of achieving low and high vacuum pressure (pumps) 3) what measurement systems are used to indicate the various ranges (gauges)
At this rate I wouldn't even be surprised if this was all figured out and done in a night. And you'd think the first guy to milk a cow was out there. Who on earth figured this out..
1. Smaller process nodes enable greater efficiency reducing the drain on batteries by electronics at a given performance level 2. We may as well continue to use the lithography industry's developed R&D resources until quick progress ends. Otherwise we'll have to rebuild the labs later on when chips are revisited. 3. Electrochemistry has very different problems, and there are no obvious improvements to be made on current technologies. Funding would go to basic (not applied) research and the chances of useful results would be extremely slim (not attractive to investors). 4. We should still fund basic research more, it's where the most important technologies come from. 5. We need better batteries, and current ones are terrible. There's quite a bit of money going into efforts to change that (both by reducing the need and improving the batteries).
I watched 10 videos before I could get this explained in a satisfactory way. Thank you sir. Absolutely fascinating
You made this so easy and interesting! I have been stressed over this for the past hour and you cleared everything within 5 minutes! Thank you!
Can we just use a moment to appreciate how he managed to make such a boring topic a much more funny and entertaining? Thank you!
How the fuck is this boring?
If you know this stuff I guess it'd be boring but assuming you don't... How is this anything but fascinating?
Pavel, maybe he knows this stuff
and short too!
He just explains the proces of making wafer’s. And if you dont know what a wafer is.. its the father of microchips. One of those first steps of creating microchips. If i’m wrong, please comment !
Great video! And I just have to say, 2:05 may be the most clever use of the "rotate" animation that I've ever seen :)
Brian Li lol
hahah, ikr, the classic rotation animation of power point
Exactlyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Also the ONLY use of the rotate animation
Thank you from Norway! You just saved my grade!
drawing on stone with light ... AWESOME!!
This is the least covered topic on the internet, I'm glad I finally found this video. Subscribing
Brilliant video. So useful, so condensed, perfection.
Watched it second time and appreciating it more, you deserve something better than only Thank you. EXCELLENT!!!
great video.....a thorough and a neat explanation!!!
Finally, I saw a bunch of videos showing the steps of building a microchip, but none explained to me how a machine was able to manipulate these tiny objects, finally this one explained, with light and chemicals, not with "physical" parts!
Very interesting and relative for today....🤔🏆
Best video out there.
Thanks alot Jae-Hwang Lee♥️♥️ Thumbs up!! You are great, shame to those disliking a video like this. Please continue to add more videos like this on the process of transistors/processor production. You the great♥️
yes really helpful.. explicitly explained
Thanks, now i know what i make at work.
Thanks a lot man, it helps me alot
very clean and interesting explanation
how does etching not remove the silicone on the side and only the unprotected silicone @ 3.11
Thank you very much for the video.
Could you tell me what are the possible causes of stitching lines?
why some lith machine macke stitching line during the lith process an other machines dont have this problem?
thank you very much!!!!!
Simple explenation , thanks...
really useful.Thanks for sharing！
can be made aerogel with photolitografy? or some kind of sponge where have nanometer bubles inside and thin walls.
To think that 14nm was the newest standard process just 7 years ago...
Great video thanks
Thumbs Up And Hats Off For Guy. How he manage the so long and boring topic to look such an easy and interesting 👍♥
Thanks Sir
saved my life thank you
The silicon dioxide @3:28 can also be grown on top of the silicon right?
very clear simple and interesting explantation
@3:38, it should be "silicon dioxide that layers on top of the silicon layer" instead of "on top of the photoresist", right?
Great video. Thanks for making it easy and short.
Great and great vıdeo !!! short and excellent explanatıon
That size matters at the end had me
Well certainly size matters but 3D printing isn't going to solve Moore's Law issue (at least not permanently); circuit boards components are reaching atomic level.
That substrate in that visualization is the same thing as the silicone right? In MEMS technology it's all about the silicone. The substate is cut from silicone. And all etching is happening to that silicone substrate wafer. They're not different things. Correct me if i'm wrong
Yes
2:59 lol your wafer moved
in 1984 and 1985 the company i did final assembly of semiconductor manufacturing equipment for, received processed wafers that had not passed QC to use as test wafers from customers that bought their products. With the developed wafers it could be seen that the circuitry was inside not on top of the wafer. The chemicals had penetrated wafer in each step. Nothing was on the wafer surface. Maybe like stained glass is not like painted glass. My guess is the glass is porous as far as glass stain is concerned. And wafers were porous as far as the chemicals used for them then,
Ok. But how do you make a mask itself? It also has extremely small features to begin with.
The point is that the optics used allow you to focus the light past the photo mask, meaning the mask itself doesn't have to be that small.
Masks can be big, the light focuses after it passes the mask, so the images are small, like in a camera, a quarter inch cmos captures however wide and far a scene you like.
Thank you very much
Wouldn't is be a higher resolution rather than a lower resolution?
Are we aliens?!! I'm just amazed how peeps were able to come up with this amazing process.
How do they create the reticle?
Well, the new Standart size is now reaching 2nm and even 1,4nm.
how does etching not remove silicone on the sides during the chemical process
the etching material wont react with the silicon.
@@tonipopa wow a reply to a question I asked 3 years ago
@@samjoshua192 yeah I watched the video and saw your question and thought I should reply 😋
@@samjoshua192 i hope it helped
Very concise.
Question, do you have to keep putting "new" photoresist for each new layer?
apparently yes
Semiconductor manufacturing equipment of the mid 1980s was used to spin the wafer as chemical streams or sprays were applied to create the layered images inside. Dopants altered the silica atomic structure to create N or P type properties that in the end left an electronic circuit inside a little square of glass called a fragment that was about the size of a square seen with 1/4 inch graph paper. Photoresist made possible the etching away of doped areas inside the thin glass like wafer. N and P type areas combined formed transistors in the maybe thousands or hundred or hundreds of thousands in tiny areas thanks to a microfiche mask used to expose the photoresist for the etching processes. Like one photograph negative sandwiched between two pieces of glass the mask was. But there were maybe about 200 little square identical images in each maybe 4 inch mask. Protected from contaminants and friction in between the two pieces of glass the film photograph negative was safe to use over and over. But special equipment was used to cleanse the mask to increase yield. Else too many of those little squares would be faulty and not an effective micro miniaturized circuit inside that black rectangular computer chip.
N using Boron (5 electron) were P using Phosphorus (3 electron) so electron can move around wafer atom (Si = 4 electron)
Silicone is a resistor, right? So making groves into the silicone by photolithography and/or etched away is the paths where electrons ie current would travel through? Would the electrons travel up and down from the grooves to the substrate or along the groves that were etched away?
Or is the electrical paths added to the etched groves during the doping phase ?
Maybe I misunderstood you, but there's a difference between silicone (a resistor), and silicon (a semi conductor) which is used as the base for the microchips.
5:23 that's what she said
Thank you
Oh my goodness. I feel so silly that I am learning everything I am... And only realized today that thermal paste is made of silicone...
Please, any wise person to ask some questions? What "silicon" is exactly, i know there are p-type & n-type, this "silicon" is the opposite type of the substrate? How is a mask of one single transistor?
Brilliant
thanks for sharing
Is Non animated -- real video of same process explained available ??????
Which book did you refer ??
Interesting
very digestable, cheers
and thus the entire digital dimension was made
Wow. Okay. I'm writing a comedy magic show for JSR Micro and this will help in creating the script. ... Silk through phone could be the cleaning process...
Where would we be without chemistry?
what is the use of photoresist and why applying and removing?
Photoresist is used To create pattern on wafers
4:38 shorter wavelength of light generate a lower resolution ?
From that formula shown obviously the higher wavelength will produce better resolution.
BTW it's a good explanation thanks.
You contradicted yourself! Check what you have written.
The formula is good. Resolution in this case is defined as feature size. Smaller feature size is better. Smaller wavelength means smaller feature size.
@@vibodhj349 he didn't contradict himself. He was asking for a clarification because he assumed that he spotted a contradiction. The first sentence was him quoting the video; I'm guessing the lack of quotation marks confused you.
good question
shorter wavelengths of light generate a higher resolution?? the shorter the wavelength the more precise the image... like you said they shortened the wavelength from 365nm to smaller wavelengths, to improve resolution. overall great concise and effective video though
Instead of R~λ/NA, R should be replaced with minimum feature size (CD) so CD~λ/NA so if the wavelength increases the minimum feature size increases and if the wavelength decreases ( frequency increases) and the minimum feature size decreases so smaller patterns can be put on the photoresist layer.
@@danarcese4248 conclusion the relationship between wavelength and resolution is?
@@danarcese4248 Waaaaaa?
@@mao5441 as wavelength increases resolution decreases
@@psun256 resolution and minimum feature size are inversely proportional. if your resolution increases (think a nice tv) then things aren't blurry and you can see more distinct objects even if they're smaller ( smaller min feature size)
Very good video very informative but had to watch it on mute as instructed by faculty
I am really at wrong uni, my knowledge and interests are much above that uni tries to teach me.
But what I could do, my country screwd up educational system so much that my only choice was some bad university
"size matters" haha this guy is funny.
size matters👍
Love the Big Ben joke! 😂
oh now I get it...
We are now at 3nm, just imagine
Today we stand at 5nm with EUV
photolithograghy: Size matters!🤣
Hopefully someone with the expertise and knowledge can help me here I cannot find my answers anywhere... I have been tasked to produce a power point on LED manufacturing and its requirement for vacuum. id be forever grateful for any the answers to any of these questions I've watched endless videos on TH-cam. Thanks in advance. The questions are:
1)A wide variety of systems used in LED manufacture require a certain level of vacuum pressure, what is the necessity for vacuum in this environment?
2) what are the various methods of achieving low and high vacuum pressure (pumps)
3) what measurement systems are used to indicate the various ranges (gauges)
Alguien en 2021?
Size matters
current 5nm
Based
Lithography and photo lithography differences?
Lithography is a physical process (like printing press) and photolithography uses light to "print" it.
@@psun256 OK thanks 😇
@@akhila838 You're welcome!
At this rate I wouldn't even be surprised if this was all figured out and done in a night. And you'd think the first guy to milk a cow was out there. Who on earth figured this out..
5:00 its 5nm now I think
Badhay nu joine aevu lage se ke jordar haseeeee.
Size matters. Yea,
jeeeesus christ u should be a rapper
5:23 Conclusion "Size matters "
size matters😁😁
"Size matters" was a bit awkward though.
printing on stone with light not printing with light (photography)
"Size matters",🤣🤣🤣
😳😶
😭😭😭😭😭🤣
Stop working on the size of chips .somone Start working on reducing the size of battery. Good video.
lol
I know right! F*** Moore and the microelectronics industry!
1. Smaller process nodes enable greater efficiency reducing the drain on batteries by electronics at a given performance level
2. We may as well continue to use the lithography industry's developed R&D resources until quick progress ends. Otherwise we'll have to rebuild the labs later on when chips are revisited.
3. Electrochemistry has very different problems, and there are no obvious improvements to be made on current technologies. Funding would go to basic (not applied) research and the chances of useful results would be extremely slim (not attractive to investors).
4. We should still fund basic research more, it's where the most important technologies come from.
5. We need better batteries, and current ones are terrible. There's quite a bit of money going into efforts to change that (both by reducing the need and improving the batteries).
Smaller process = less heat and lower power comsumption.
If they work on making it smaller, you won't need a massive battery.
It's made that way for planned obsolesce.
1:40, i think u meant SiO2
Yes it sio2 not si
Size matters
lol
5:23 thats whats she said hahaha
@2024 chip size reached 3nm
did you say SIZE MATTERS
lol
how a university project video in the end says "size matters"
Let's make sure the Chinese government does t get their hands on this content
Who r seeing this in 2023?
A bit outdate...
please sir send me video in hindi language
LOL. Good luck with that.
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
Needs improvements, too rigid and unoriginal