CJI Chandrachud & SG Mehta Weigh In On Wealth Redistribution During Constitutional Bench Hearing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 577

  • @varadharajanranganathan3761
    @varadharajanranganathan3761 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +700

    RaGa has no idea of how difficult to earn a monthly salary. An unemployable bum. Obviously he comes up with such bizarre ideas.. and we waste our precious time, discussing this..

    • @ronwilson5075
      @ronwilson5075 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rahul Gandhin never said anything about wealth redistribution. Please do a 'fact-check'. th-cam.com/video/psjUzs_TFh8/w-d-xo.html

    • @sakalasiva
      @sakalasiva 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      If you don't discuss today, tomorrow Congress may come to the power and do exactly same then you will have all the time to discuss about impact of it in addition to poverty. So you want to discuss now and make country aware of its negatives or experience it and then talk about it.

    • @GururajBN
      @GururajBN 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      We have to discuss because there are a few crores of pappus in India who have been regularly voting for congress.

    • @sr2.044
      @sr2.044 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      However, the bizarre idea is we should promote discussion as many people like RaGa don't have the common sense to think more broadly.

    • @yoganandmantravadi1993
      @yoganandmantravadi1993 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      See how many pappu sit at home without voting
      Their wealth should be taken away

  • @harshildhaduk3766
    @harshildhaduk3766 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +158

    CJI is clearly saying respect privatisation.
    Government have no trees of money.
    Major portion of economic development is private investment.
    But shame on Congress.
    They will always criticise adani, Ambani.

    • @jdsriharsha295
      @jdsriharsha295 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kuch kehna hai av?

    • @moonku_1312
      @moonku_1312 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bhai ab Modi also criticizing what about that 😂

  • @bose6483
    @bose6483 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +437

    First khangress should return the money they have looted for 65 years from our nation .

    • @amangadpale9284
      @amangadpale9284 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Which Money

    • @saptarshiadhikary3736
      @saptarshiadhikary3736 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@amangadpale9284 corruption money maybe.

    • @sakshamsinhax
      @sakshamsinhax 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@amangadpale9284corruption like 2G scam ,coal scam ,bafoi scam.....

    • @uditkumarsingh202
      @uditkumarsingh202 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@amangadpale9284 Starting from Army Jeep Scam.

    • @OmPaik-b8c
      @OmPaik-b8c 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ask your father raga​@@amangadpale9284

  • @pubgaf3356
    @pubgaf3356 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +996

    PAPPU needs to go back to Thailand again to recharge his last 2 brain cells

    • @soumyapramanik1891
      @soumyapramanik1891 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Nehi Thailand mein Jake itne moj karenge ki last 2 brain cells fused ho jayega

    • @gopaakrishnanmvenkataraman9129
      @gopaakrishnanmvenkataraman9129 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      One needs brain to have cells in it

    • @harshildhaduk3766
      @harshildhaduk3766 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Is pappu having brain.
      I doubt it😂😂😂.
      Shame on Congress.

    • @vasudevabhats1600
      @vasudevabhats1600 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Pappu, and Brain ? 😂😂😂

    • @NeuzEmo
      @NeuzEmo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      My neighbour name is PAPPU😝😝😝😝😝

  • @jhkblr2600
    @jhkblr2600 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +131

    Wealth Distribution was done in 1947 by Nehru through Zamindari Act. When CPIM came to power in West Bengal for the first time, they introduced the same and we have seen the downfall of Bengal since then.
    INC is now filled by jobless jerks of DU, JNU, SFI and they come up with ideas like providing reservations at secretary level jobs, reservations in private sector. Commie mindset needs strong strikedown

    • @user-wb8ql4ky7j
      @user-wb8ql4ky7j 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your last para😂,,, is the real BIG truth,,which some people don't understand​@catfish9391

    • @abhaypatel4292
      @abhaypatel4292 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Zamindari act was actually necessary very necessary and a really great way

    • @jhkblr2600
      @jhkblr2600 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@abhaypatel4292 and its bad economics. Small farmers did not and could not take benefit out of land holdings as they were very small. Units Economics could not work out and they remained poor and more marginalised.

    • @noobgamer-xl3jk
      @noobgamer-xl3jk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@abhaypatel4292 It was actually necessary at that time but doing it now will scatter our economy.

  • @SANJAYVATS-rz7gbfiresafety
    @SANJAYVATS-rz7gbfiresafety 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +703

    Hindu earn and congress distribute hindus money to in muslim only

    • @mrshah2832
      @mrshah2832 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Bro when did government distribute wealth we are paying tax on each and every thing.

    • @IndianQaus
      @IndianQaus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kya pagal panti hai😂😂😂Kuch Bhi ho Hindu -Muslim

    • @Sam-dd1he
      @Sam-dd1he 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@mrshah2832first go and read about WAQF ACT.
      Land ownership to pehle hi ja chuki h jwellery hi bachi h bas😢

    • @atntaltd
      @atntaltd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

      @@mrshah2832 government giving salary to MAULANA , taxing mandir bur mosque is tax free ?
      inequality right there , lets redistribute WAQF property built schools , toilets and hospitals

    • @atntaltd
      @atntaltd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      @@mrshah2832
      9cr toilets ? who is using it ? dalit, muslims are the prime beneficiary , this is were your taxed money is going

  • @leelajaala6448
    @leelajaala6448 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

    Why the SC is wasting the national time on the stupid ideas floated by the headless chicken, I don't understand.

    • @pankajsamanta1602
      @pankajsamanta1602 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      It's important bro SC have to take the case and dismissed it otherwise if some day congress comes to power they will apply this rule

    • @peachNplum
      @peachNplum 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      SC is validating what the majority of hard-working and tax-paying citizens think. Its important for the CJI to clear the air since the idea itself was gross.

    • @georgecarlinn6288
      @georgecarlinn6288 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is not stupid idea it is an cunning idea which is waqf act

  • @gagswag
    @gagswag 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +309

    Wealth distribution sounds like a screwed up concept...it is not fair to take others hard earned money and distribute to someone else. Enough opportunities and discounts are being given to SC, ST, OBCs to improve themselves..

    • @sakalasiva
      @sakalasiva 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

      Sorry this money is not to distribute among sc,st,obc rather collect from all Hindus and give it to Muslims. Remember Manmohan Singh golden words Muslims have first right on resources of India.

    • @gagswag
      @gagswag 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      @@sakalasiva yes..that is also true..maximum favors are given to that community and yet they act like victims..

    • @sr2.044
      @sr2.044 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@gagswag They always act like victims in a democracy until they are significant in number after that they will do everything to make you a victim and lastly they will demand shiria law. If you think otherwise look up to Bangladesh.

    • @pipipupu5104
      @pipipupu5104 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​​@@sr2.044 what's happened in Bangladesh

    • @Sangama333
      @Sangama333 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They won't be taking from anybody
      But They will make portions from the budget and then distribute I guess
      More like freebies from government a/c

  • @harshildhaduk3766
    @harshildhaduk3766 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

    USA economy Will collapse if Google,Meta, apple,tesla,etc will be out from USA or not encourage.
    Like that if private companies like TATA, Adani, Mahindra, Ambani,etc should also be encouraged.
    Because without all this indian economy will collapse.

    • @Ajor777
      @Ajor777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why they wil be out, they are owned by Amecians.

    • @SahilSingh-nx5yx
      @SahilSingh-nx5yx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Exactly and some stupid people are busy in hating them for absolute no reason

    • @fact_tronix6993
      @fact_tronix6993 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bro but chronic capatalism nhi hona chahiye na dusra yeh chutiye congress vale jo Halla gulla macha rahe yeh toh modi ji se bhi jyada Ambanis ko uthane mai Lage Thai dhirubhai Ambani

    • @TheBatman565
      @TheBatman565 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      See economic inequality in USA and India
      In india its too much compared to USA

    • @fact_tronix6993
      @fact_tronix6993 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@TheBatman565 because India don't have that much companies compare to usa and china that why inequality is to much and for that level of companies India have to continuously built companies with fdi for over 40 years like america and china do

  • @prasvasu4217
    @prasvasu4217 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Thank you Justice Sir for shutting down this conversation. It is the 21st century; and politicians (leeches of the economy) can divide the vote bank by such junk ideas is honestly discouraging to see; especially in a growing democracy.

  • @shivanepal1433
    @shivanepal1433 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Zimbabwe distributed land and is facing the agricultural problems

  • @WBSchoolOfMaths
    @WBSchoolOfMaths 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

    Man work hard to earn money and pappu want to snatch it and give it to the father of 10 children.

    • @ismartshankar215
      @ismartshankar215 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      That is why he is pappu idk why he is forcing peoples to vote for bjp 😂

    • @amankumar-ob6sh
      @amankumar-ob6sh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@ismartshankar215bhai bjp hi thick hai kam se kam aise pagalo se toh acha

  • @narayancrakshit2368
    @narayancrakshit2368 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Fantastic assessment by respected cji.❤❤
    Rustic & juvenile R behold .......😊

    • @lazydamsel
      @lazydamsel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kya bole

  • @sierra_117rj
    @sierra_117rj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Disband WAQF board, and redistribute its property to people needed cuz the property under WAQF is of government plus some private.

  • @vasumanu
    @vasumanu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    It would be utter stupidity to suggest that wealth should be grabbed from one person and given to other...it is stealing the labour of one and giving to another may be lazy person..utter chaotic , demotivating and devasting step is suggested..this is what maoist and naxalbaries are also suggesting

    • @SM-sb9fg
      @SM-sb9fg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly

    • @pratapkurup1113
      @pratapkurup1113 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That seems the idea behind the move, to distribute the wealth between a certain minority and tukde tukde groups

    • @gauravg9810
      @gauravg9810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is a planning to destroy Indian economy, congress is already taken over by China loving communists.

  • @TheDURWAS
    @TheDURWAS 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Abe paap, My parents stayed a slum in Mumbai... They worked for the past 30 years and saved a ton of money, paid loans hence they have wealth. Stop mocking people's hardwork.

  • @NeuzEmo
    @NeuzEmo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +164

    Never ever going to vote for congress

    • @Terabaap123.
      @Terabaap123. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Capitalist theives.......

    • @antareshmondal7157
      @antareshmondal7157 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why?
      Will you please explain sir?
      Jai shree Ram,Jai Hanuman, Jai Mahadev,Jai shree krishna.........,.........

    • @amankumar-ob6sh
      @amankumar-ob6sh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@antareshmondal7157congress ko iss bar vote dene ka socha tha par jab se usne ye wealth vali bat boli ab toh jivan mai na du khangress ko vote

    • @Arandombharatiya-rt5kp
      @Arandombharatiya-rt5kp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@antareshmondal7157bjp is better

    • @antareshmondal7157
      @antareshmondal7157 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Arandombharatiya-rt5kp chauvinism is not good for anyone.

  • @yourstrulytk12worldaffairs
    @yourstrulytk12worldaffairs 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +189

    It's equal distribution of poverty not wealth

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is literally looting General Caste people and giving to illegal Immigrants from Bangladesh

    • @amit6468
      @amit6468 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      I will not take your share of poverty. Why should I? I earn my money with hardwork, no freebies for loosers.

    • @sh-chhotoo
      @sh-chhotoo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      First Rahul Gandhi give Congress party to non family person

    • @yourstrulytk12worldaffairs
      @yourstrulytk12worldaffairs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sh-chhotoo
      Are wo naamdaar hain... Unpe.prashna mat karo... Humari aukat nahi hai naamdar ko question karne ki...

    • @yugeshncr3499
      @yugeshncr3499 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Why should I engage with you?.....go and work hard man

  • @kamalsh6123
    @kamalsh6123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    RaGa should put his theory into practice by first acquiring the wealth of the WAQF board and distributing it among the poor Indians of all faiths. Has he got the guts to do it?

  • @subhasiskumar6906
    @subhasiskumar6906 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Did Congress won the election? Govt formed? Why the hell is this being discussed on supreme court 😆

    • @eklavyajain09
      @eklavyajain09 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      They're just discussing about interpretation of Article 39 and this was pointed out by SG as an example.

    • @vishalrao4073
      @vishalrao4073 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@eklavyajain09if someone is doing MBA and he gets any MNC job worth 12LPA or 25LPA, then if they will snatch all money from him and distribute it in few people who just did 10th or even who would be just 4th-5th class pass without any knowledge or experience....then why someone would do MBA or higher salary jobs and businesses.

    • @eklavyajain09
      @eklavyajain09 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@vishalrao4073 exactly my point too

    • @gauravg9810
      @gauravg9810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This gives us social security that concerned matters are time to time discussed in Supreme Court. Discussion is an important aspect of Democracy.

    • @BoomBoom-sc7ek
      @BoomBoom-sc7ek 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@vishalrao4073reason for good scholars going foreign
      This politicians is not even get matured to take what action should be they doing politics

  • @GururajBN
    @GururajBN 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Income and Wealth survey and its redistribution is juvenile economics. What else can one expect from the wise men of congress led by Rahul Gandhi? The idea seems to be “If we can’t lift the poor, let’s pull down the rich.”

  • @conscons5776
    @conscons5776 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    who would like to GENERATE WEALTH if this is to be implimented... its a failed policy of many nations.. and many will invest abroad than in india

  • @ChandraPradip
    @ChandraPradip 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If this happens, mark my words, everyone who is earning well will leave India ASAP.

    • @SnehaSingh-qw2id
      @SnehaSingh-qw2id 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everyone can't leave no. That's what is the challenge.

    • @girichandra4320
      @girichandra4320 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What happens to your assets ??

    • @girichandra4320
      @girichandra4320 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What happens to your assets ??

  • @hrudairoshan
    @hrudairoshan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    You can never have equality of outcomes, so the govt should strive for equality of oppurtunity. So concentrate on public health, transportation, education, access to clean water and toilets

    • @subhrajitgupta5535
      @subhrajitgupta5535 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Jaya Pakash narayan?

    • @atntaltd
      @atntaltd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@subhrajitgupta5535 old days are gone

    • @atntaltd
      @atntaltd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@subhrajitgupta5535 if you talk JP look at bihar
      where it is right now ?

    • @chaitanyavelamala7268
      @chaitanyavelamala7268 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This sounds like something JP would say
      I meant Jordan Peterson

    • @atntaltd
      @atntaltd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@chaitanyavelamala7268 yeah lots of western shit is gona come our way , we need desi JPs , like J sai deepak

  • @IM_NO_BODY_
    @IM_NO_BODY_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Why court giving their precious time to discuss about even when things not executed till now and also remake of RAGA in broader interpretation,
    And why court have enough time to discuss about even so many important case still pending please be focused on these cases

    • @arvinbhat8921
      @arvinbhat8921 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      So were you against SC discussing on NRC when it was not executed.

    • @castiel1115
      @castiel1115 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What broader interpretation? It is explicitly said who will lose wealth and who it will go to, in their speeches. Also the opposition moves to court if Modi didn't shower for one day. Is this a one-sided judiciary?

  • @kantvx
    @kantvx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    CJI speaks of “We” and “Policy” in the same sentence and there goes separation of powers in our republic.

  • @ashokp1027
    @ashokp1027 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Give ur weath to whoever u want don't think about others , we pay tax our whole life .after death whatever left is for our family not for some unknown fellowa.they have produced 10 kids and it's their responsibility to take care of them not us

  • @madhavant9516
    @madhavant9516 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Let congress party and its leaders distribute all their wealth to whomsoever they want. That will be a good start.

  • @Kaafiristani
    @Kaafiristani 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Brilliant just brilliant. Justice Chandrachud won a new fan in me.
    The Russia Dictated policies, like nationalization, 5 year plans, high taxation on entrepreneurship kept us in Ration Ki line, only after we adopted the US's free market economy model in 1991 did we prosper.

  • @sachbol3912
    @sachbol3912 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    REFORM JUDICIARY SO THAT BUDDIES WHO HANGOUT DONT CORNER AND HIJACK THE SYSTEM. THE SAMEVUNCH OF LAWYERS ACTIVIST AND JUDGES HAVE BEEN GRINDING THE SAME SET OF ISSUES THAT DONT SERVE NATIONS INTEREST BUT SERVE VESTED INTERESTS.
    A COMMON MAN SUFFERS DEPENDING ON DILAPIDATED JUSTICE SYSTEM AND LAWS. NO ONE FEARS LAW NOR RULE OF LAW

  • @ShashankSingh-hb8uf
    @ShashankSingh-hb8uf 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    4th june ko public karega vote distribution....😂😂😂😂 pata chl jayega

  • @anantsaini
    @anantsaini 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Long Live Free Market Capitalism! Socialism Haye Haye!

  • @Madhugargeya
    @Madhugargeya 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In such case i will eat all my wealth before i die. Also i will ensure i will not spend money in this country

  • @dr_sriraviteja
    @dr_sriraviteja 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Forget entire Nation, this kind of logic wouldn’t even be applied to a Family!
    The fact that this thought is even being discussed in 2024 is scary. Where r we going as a country n society?

  • @senthilkunnur
    @senthilkunnur 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Congress should their policy in Karnataka first

  • @abhijitksinha8296
    @abhijitksinha8296 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Extreme left, generally left and generally right, extreme right is the process.
    Now we are generally right.

  • @meenusharma2288
    @meenusharma2288 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video should be viral

  • @hrishikeshsarkar6513
    @hrishikeshsarkar6513 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CJI is absolutely right.

  • @Sagar_Retwal
    @Sagar_Retwal 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I am brahmin from the poorer sides. My family does not own any lands. If I get fraction of wealth from adani who is a jain (minority) or Yadav's (OBC) Owaisi and Pataudi (Muslim minority). I don't mind voting for congress infact I will be the first to vote. who would want to work hard when you generational wealth and power like my dear idol Raga.

    • @ismartshankar215
      @ismartshankar215 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Conceptually you are wrong because there is more jobless peace full people with 10 to 20 member in a single family ,so if this fking redistribute happens you didn't get a single penny infact your hardwork money goes to the uneducated jobless peacefull peoples
      Have some morals if you have guts then go outside do hardwork earn money income should be directly proportional to your hardwork only

    • @vidyamadamanchi7091
      @vidyamadamanchi7091 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But they worked hard to get their wealth. You can do the same

    • @arohik1901
      @arohik1901 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      According to you success belongs to everyone, everyone have right on its wealth, but failure belongs to individual. If a person default on their loan , no one will try to help him or her. But that person becomes successful, everyone start hating and want share in it.

    • @adarsh_mishra451
      @adarsh_mishra451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@arohik1901sister ,,, understand sarcasm 🫂

    • @adarsh_mishra451
      @adarsh_mishra451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@vidyamadamanchi7091
      Our constitution can allow caste politics,,,reservations ,,, subsidies and schemes to a special group ??? Just because they are marginalised ,,,,,so this is also possible if congress wins 💪🏻🔱

  • @funtimefunny2153
    @funtimefunny2153 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Even this super woke cji is bemused

  • @kalyanchatterjee1617
    @kalyanchatterjee1617 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Guru, Mr Ram Churis and Disciple Rahul Bangles to note this observation.

  • @t1621
    @t1621 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    *Every Khangressi wants wealth distribution. They want everyone's wealth to be distributed except their own.* 😂😂😂

  • @saamywaad
    @saamywaad 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here people are talking about st, SC & obc and not even considering the ews reservation. 😅😅😅
    As a court you do not have right to decide political economy of Bharat. Are you an economist?

  • @PinakiGupta82Appu
    @PinakiGupta82Appu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wealth redistribution is a complex and potentially challenging policy to implement. It is a bit extreme, a recipe for disaster. There have been historical examples, such as in the Soviet Union under Stalin, where the state sought to abolish private property and seize the means of production through communist policies. In a communist system, the state owned everything, and individuals were expected to align themselves with the state's ideology, with no room for other political or religious beliefs. There was no discrimination as long as one aligned with the state's communist views.
    While this approach may have worked for a time, it raises concerns about individual freedoms and the potential for the state to essentially "enslave" its people, reducing them to mere cogs in the state's machinery. The motivations for personal development and progress could also be stifled in such a system.
    Once I had a conversation with a Bangladeshi person in 2019. That person asked me why India cannot get out of the labyrinth of sect politics while Bangladesh can do away with reservations. I explained to that person what is possible in Bangladesh due to its demographic composition is not currently feasible in India, at least at the moment.
    However, one thing must be kept in mind implanting a policy in a socialist democracy and partially capitalist country by grabbing it from a communist regime of a particular era in history will not be effective. In a more democratic and mixed-economy context, like that of India, the implementation of redistributive policies would be vastly different. Reservations, for example, are not inherently problematic in our situation, but they should be carefully designed and implemented based on objective criteria, such as financial instability, regional backwardness, and physical disabilities, rather than on discriminatory grounds.
    The benefits provided through reservations should be reviewed periodically to ensure they are still necessary and proportionate. The status of individuals benefiting from reservations should be periodically reviewed. Discriminatory reservations can create grievances and make certain groups feel marginalised, which goes against the principle of treating all people with equal dignity and respect, regardless of their background. People should be treated with dignity for everyone has equal potential, nobody is small.
    In summary, while reservations and related policies can be considered, their implementation must be carefully evaluated and tailored to the specific socio-political and economic context of a country. Blindly adopting approaches from communist regimes of the past, that too, after distorting the intent, may not be effective or desirable in a democratic, mixed-economy setting.

  • @jrelax8236
    @jrelax8236 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Kamaye koi aur khaye koi...where is the incentive then...socialism is a regressive philosophy...aaj ka Bharat needs capitalism with a degree of socialism...to move ahead...Nehru regime experimented a lot with socialism and enough of that pls...

  • @fawa.z
    @fawa.z 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wealth distribution will be immoral. Creating systems of spending on social causes will be more beneficial. Better schools, hospitals, good infrastructure. These are also wealth.

  • @Wiggie_Wiggie
    @Wiggie_Wiggie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's a common sense. If you take all the wealth from Ambani, then how will he pay salaries to millions of Indians working in refineries, telecom, reliance marts , trends etc.
    How will they maintain profit and how will they expand?
    This is the most disastrous idea a government can think of. In odisha the govt has started giving rice to poor people at rs 1. This has made them so lazy that they don't want to do work. They have no will to get rich , they know that they have enough money to feed their generations because they have thousands of rs 1. 😑 This is the reality.

  • @Sanatansister5623
    @Sanatansister5623 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    They will give the right to the wakf board to claim and occupy any property without allowing the owner to go to the court and file a case. But whenit comes to distributing resources they will not touch those 7 lakh crore of wakf lands

    • @krishnabhagath2405
      @krishnabhagath2405 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Waqf board was allowed and made legal by khangress leaders so u don't u ask this question to khangress and the supreme court judge who made this as legal

    • @Sanatansister5623
      @Sanatansister5623 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@krishnabhagath2405 This is a question mark for Hindus, who never protest against such atrocities against their community, that's why Khangress was able to rule the Country for 60 years

    • @soumengorai8346
      @soumengorai8346 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Sanatansister5623i know secular hindus have fault but Supreme Court can also remove it because people don't interested in any type of politics 😁

    • @Sanatansister5623
      @Sanatansister5623 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@soumengorai8346 Supreme court cannot remove any law, ite should be done through the Parliament. Supreme court will only follow the law from the Constitution and unfortunately the Constitution of this Country is Anti Hindu

    • @Sanatansister5623
      @Sanatansister5623 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@soumengorai8346 Supreme court cannot remove any law, ite should be done through the Parliament. Supreme court will only follow the law from the Constitution and unfortunately the Constitution of this Country is Anti Hindu

  • @cnxindustries3276
    @cnxindustries3276 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Surplus law needed once again in every way

  • @Indobachi
    @Indobachi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Reservation is one part of this idea
    Becoz of that some people have birth privileges to own a luxury without earning it....

    • @atultejaswi22
      @atultejaswi22 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      After becoming rich , have guts to leave reservation

  • @atul58
    @atul58 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If all the wealth of the world is distributed equally amongst all, within a few hours some will become super rich and some will become extremely poor. This is the nature of human behaviour. 😂

  • @kartik5001
    @kartik5001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The CJI is a smart man

  • @KishorShah4
    @KishorShah4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cji sir, please do something to reduce court cases pending time'
    What a justice if case comes up for hearing àfter 20 years.
    Àfter death of concern party

  • @kamakshiyadav5980
    @kamakshiyadav5980 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Already temples r taxed
    Middle class. Taxed
    Ab toh inheritance bhi taxed
    Pappu agar galti se bhi aaya toh tata bye bye

    • @adarsh_mishra451
      @adarsh_mishra451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mai to iss desh se chala jaunga 😢💔

  • @DEVENDRASAGARMAHARISHIDEO
    @DEVENDRASAGARMAHARISHIDEO 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is very easy to say distribution of wealth among people equally which is a difficult task.

  • @SM-sb9fg
    @SM-sb9fg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Taxes are being paid for the same purpose. Higher income higher tax..simple logic 🤔 how come big people are missing this?

  • @eklavyajain09
    @eklavyajain09 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yaha ek mahine ki salary kamane me halat kharab ho jati hai aur wo v baant di jayegi ab?

  • @RK-es8oj
    @RK-es8oj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes, start from supreme court lawyers, they were drawing 25 lakhs per hour.. as fee...
    then people of India will appreciate.....

  • @mandarp9472
    @mandarp9472 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Individual wealth or assets are not for public consumption.
    Government already taxes everything using GST, Capital Gains Tax, Securities Transaction Tax, Customs duty, Service Tax.

  • @Mhmdwazpedo21
    @Mhmdwazpedo21 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ambedkar ji wanted complete exchange of population after partition. He even compared muslims to german dictator.
    Ever wonder why?

  • @rajendrajasathy4356
    @rajendrajasathy4356 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We still have time, make sure to Vote for BJP else Congress will loot our pockets and will make this a muslim nation....

  • @theconfusedgod6866
    @theconfusedgod6866 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bhailog sirf idhar hi aag nahi lagani hai. VOTE VOTE VOTE!!! MODI KO VOTE!!!

  • @gopaakrishnanmvenkataraman9129
    @gopaakrishnanmvenkataraman9129 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    To create incentive for be idle or lazy is not the job of govt .
    Welath is respect earned not a gift of govt nor anyone
    Pride of nation and being prowd to contribute to nation development is one and the same

  • @hansvonmeinstien3660
    @hansvonmeinstien3660 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Robert vadra worth around 2.1 billion and inheritance tax should be put on gandhi family first .

  • @RaviKiran-lx2kw
    @RaviKiran-lx2kw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pappus has20 crore immovable asset.. Let's acquire it first

  • @nickhartnet4192
    @nickhartnet4192 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why are we tax payers having to pay for this nonsense, let Rahul pay for the court's time

  • @krishnanvc5767
    @krishnanvc5767 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why are we becoming so stupid. Discussing and wasting time on a stupid idea taking Bharat back to the dark ages. WE DO NOT NEED A POL POT REGIME.The SC should THROW OUT THIS CASE.

  • @antareshmondal7157
    @antareshmondal7157 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Don't vote for BJP.

  • @13rohitv
    @13rohitv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wealth distribution from government employees & politician, that includes judicial department also will be perfect

  • @lokendrapushpad4436
    @lokendrapushpad4436 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Articles 39(b) and (c) do emphasize the redistribution of wealth and prevention of wealth concentration, but they do so within the framework of a democratic and mixed economy, aiming to balance individual rights with social justice. This is not equivalent to advocating for communism, but rather for a welfare-oriented economic policy where the state ensures that economic inequalities are minimized and resources are used for the common good.

  • @harshildhaduk3766
    @harshildhaduk3766 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    CJI best answer that interpretation of article in constitution evolved as per nature and time we are living.
    Some laws and interpretation of 1950 will not work as per 21st century.
    So modiji want to change some laws in constitution.
    So vote as per statement.
    "survival of the fittest "

  • @kamakshiyadav5980
    @kamakshiyadav5980 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Congress needs to srsly get their priorities right

  • @vidyamadamanchi7091
    @vidyamadamanchi7091 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But the efforts are different right ? Somebody has put lots of effort, blood and sweat into wealth creation and somebody just sat and got wealth. So something very stupid is being discussed

  • @girishpai4538
    @girishpai4538 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does Raga know how hard it is to make wealth to Redistribute it why doesnt he redistribute his wealth of 10000 crore

  • @ashishpandey8537
    @ashishpandey8537 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cji also knows that growth can only be done via privatisation pr yeh saale bolte hai desh bech diya 😂😂😂

  • @BasuDev-y6r
    @BasuDev-y6r 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SC judges think they are above the government elected by the people. It is not their problem. If Congress forms government (0.1% chance), CJI will not be able to do anything if Rahul Gandhi decides to redistribute wealth. Remember Shah Bano case?
    Interestingly, most people are missing the main point: redistribution of wealth is already happening. Taxation is redistribution of wealth. It is a different matter that what Rahul Gandhi wants even Rahul Gandhi does not know. May be Sam Pitroda knows, but he will not speak to media anymore I think!

  • @nagraj2k1
    @nagraj2k1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is the need for background music in this video? The tiktokisation of media continues…

  • @nareshshingote8081
    @nareshshingote8081 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But we don't need courts to talk on economic issues, rather they should focus on solving cases

  • @Chomusuke71
    @Chomusuke71 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is a bit unclear, the court is discussing on the interpretation of the article 39(b) and not on anything mentioned by the congress. It was about the fact that India is moving forward towards more of a free market than a socialistic approach and thus the article should be interpreted in similar light. The discussion wasn't political but the video tries to make it sound political and that the court is condemning a socialistic policy by mentioning congress' survey

  • @Shyam12roy
    @Shyam12roy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To all the people who are commenting that sc is wasting the time on such topic. Remember it's Just a clip of the conversation you don't even know that it's matter of interpretation of the const.(Rules,laws,by laws ,acts, section). Constitutional bench is hearing this matter.kahan kahn se aa jate hai comment karne ke lie

  • @adi45713
    @adi45713 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For all his faults, I must say CJI is very well balanced & much more matured individual (except probably his views on family concept) compared to his son or any other justices/judges.

  • @AnalystRK
    @AnalystRK 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congress should make example by donating its entire wealth to poor people. They should make condition that anyone who wish to join Congress or wish to stay in party should do by donating their entire wealth like Jain saints.

  • @Itachi_88mm
    @Itachi_88mm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Even Pakistan agrees with Raga on wealth distribution

  • @hrishikeshsarkar6513
    @hrishikeshsarkar6513 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No businessman, no startup company will work hard when the Government distribute their money randomly. Even common people will be lazy. Instead of this, government should make policy on salary and tax slab for low and middle class people.

  • @judewarner1536
    @judewarner1536 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The problem is not so much Wealth distribution as it is Income distribution. There are HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS whose incomes are so low that they can neither actively engage with the country's national economy nor contribute to it. This actually inhibits the growth of businesses and thus reduces the potential GDP and the country's wealth to the DETRIMENT OF ALL.

  • @rkrishnamoorthy1785
    @rkrishnamoorthy1785 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My view is Congress party should declare itself a communist party and if people vote for it Communism will be the policy.Why beat about the bush.Taking wealth in excess ( what is the bench mark has to be defined and how it should be computed)from the person and give it to a poor man and how this poor man should be defined for eligible to receive that wealth and in what way. A pathway to Erewhon.( No where)

  • @AashraiRavooru
    @AashraiRavooru 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All good and correct but why is such a philosophical case even being heard, do we have no other pressing cases. Sounds more like a podcast than a courtroom.

  • @Anarchist_communist
    @Anarchist_communist 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CJI has moral issues, we don't need him anymore...

  • @s.t.chandrasekharbabu132
    @s.t.chandrasekharbabu132 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Equitable wealth is different from equal wealth.

  • @narayanjoshi9346
    @narayanjoshi9346 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CJI IS FORGETTING COMPLETELY ONE THING THAT GOVT INVESTMENTS AREN'T COST EFFECTIVE AND TIME BOUND IN PROJECTS. IN DEFENSE PRODUCTION L& T AND GODREJ ARE SUCCESSFUL IN EARLY DELIVERY OF ORDERS.

  • @backpropagation8365
    @backpropagation8365 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Forced wealth redistribution has not worked anywhere in the world and it never will. Rich and upper income people will just leave the country taking the wealth with them. When other countries are ready to welcome richer Indians, any stupid redistribution will lead to abject poverty and misery in India due to massive wealth drain and brain drain. This is not the time for India to be discussing wealth redistribution when per capita income is less than $3000. This is the time for everyone to work hard and grow wealth for everyone by clocking 10%+ real growth rates . It is premature to talk about wealth distribution in a relatively poor country like India. If wealth distribution is congress’ vision for 2047, I can bet you 100% India will become a failed nation. So think and vote carefully.

  • @A__SB
    @A__SB 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes, CJI has his wealth hidden in Swiss banks. Keju sends bitcoins to all CJI.

  • @akapandeo
    @akapandeo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nobody is asking for a rustic way of looking at the economy , common

  • @OpenSoceity
    @OpenSoceity 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hindus should have large hearts against our muslim brothers and pay the jizya for their upliftment

  • @RafaelSoriaGarcia-gs8ud
    @RafaelSoriaGarcia-gs8ud 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    रखना एक बुद्धिमान निर्णय लगता है।

  • @Rakesh4386
    @Rakesh4386 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Supreme jokers should first be accountable

  • @harip394
    @harip394 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We are trying to follow failed idea, we have enough time to debate but supreme court do not have time to dispose pending cases.

  • @abhijeethatti9095
    @abhijeethatti9095 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Before this Let Pappu and His Party Leaders Declare Their Assets and How Much Part Is Going Redistribute It and Also Same With CJI

  • @RaviIndranSR
    @RaviIndranSR 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Even if the wealth is distributed the fool and his wealth will soon be seperated.

  • @hrishikeshsarkar6513
    @hrishikeshsarkar6513 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Even Russia and China is not following communist form of economy.