Hey there - fascinating stuff. I have just completed my ANOVA comparing 3 means which was statistically significant. I then moved onto the Post Hocs and did Tukey as well as Fisher's LSD. Numbers in the tables are the same BUT in the Tukey, X variable mean 'p' value was significantly different to Y mean whereas Fisher found 2 mean 'p' values to be significantly different (X and Z) in comparison to Y. ARGH. Which post hoc do I choose? I can cite Hayter as the reason I chose Fisher, but having 2 statistically significiant values changes my whole report so unsure of the right approach. Any advice?
Hi. Thank you for the very detailed and useful videos. What would be a proper post-hoc test for more than 3 groups following a repeated measures ANOVA? Thank you!
Hi, may I know alpha values for fisher protected LSD used is 0.05 or we can also use 0.01?
Hey there - fascinating stuff. I have just completed my ANOVA comparing 3 means which was statistically significant. I then moved onto the Post Hocs and did Tukey as well as Fisher's LSD. Numbers in the tables are the same BUT in the Tukey, X variable mean 'p' value was significantly different to Y mean whereas Fisher found 2 mean 'p' values to be significantly different (X and Z) in comparison to Y. ARGH. Which post hoc do I choose? I can cite Hayter as the reason I chose Fisher, but having 2 statistically significiant values changes my whole report so unsure of the right approach. Any advice?
Assumptions of independence, normality and homogeneity of variance were all met...
Hi. Thank you for the very detailed and useful videos. What would be a proper post-hoc test for more than 3 groups following a repeated measures ANOVA? Thank you!
Ebrahim Lari Turkeys HSD
Is this contingent on the n in each group. What if your n in each group is between 3 and 5?
Is the assumption of homogeneity of variance satisfied with your data?
Let's goooooooooooooooooooooooooo