Faster Logins with Passkeys | Bitwarden Passkey Tutorial

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 96

  • @rwg1811
    @rwg1811 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    My wife is a non computer person and she was watching this with me and was asking how passkeys work. After a few minutes of her listening to me and not understanding what I was talking about she finally came up with an analogy that I think actually describes past keys very well.
    She said it's kind of like a lock and a key.
    And I think that's a very good analogy. In this case Bitwarden creates both the lock and key which is unique in the whole universe and it gives the lock to the web site. Bitwarden keeps the only key available to that lock.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great analogy!

    • @yungle15
      @yungle15 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A passKEY is like a lock and key!? Wow thanks genius 😱

  • @ricardovargas678
    @ricardovargas678 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I really hope that, overtime, more webpages use Passkey as as sign-in method and not as a MFA.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You and me both! There are some already but still a very long way to go.

  • @John-fj3qw
    @John-fj3qw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Another excellent tutorial, thanks for staying on top of this tech, I have learned a great deal from your videos. Could you make a bitwarden tutorial for mobile use.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'll look into it! I had some challenges on a prior video with recording due to privacy features (which is great) on some password managers. Let me see what I can do!

    • @John-fj3qw
      @John-fj3qw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks Jason that would be awesome 👍

  • @MindBlower18
    @MindBlower18 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is great information 👍
    Thx from Munich 😉

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

  • @Johnlayne65
    @Johnlayne65 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks quickest explanation I've seen.

  • @Damariobros
    @Damariobros 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do you get Bitwarden to take over using passkeys in Windows 10? Whenever I attempt to do anything with passkeys, whether logging in or creating one, WIndows prompts me to insert a security key.

  • @redblitz
    @redblitz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for the video - very useful!
    On a sidenote - what is your Chrome theme called? Love that dark blue gradient!

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm not sure what the theme is. It's one of the default ones that is available.

  • @bigjoegamer
    @bigjoegamer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for the info. Good video. I'm looking forward to device-bound passkey management on Linux, and the ability to use passkeys to sign in to Linux apps and websites without downloading a password manager or using a browser's built-in password manager.
    Also, the ability to import and export passkeys across all of my devices and password managers would be awesome. For example, exporting my Bitwarden passkeys to a file (encrypted or unencrypted) and then importing them into an Android phone or iPhone or Linux/Windows/macOS computer or another password manager. Or just skipping the "file" part and letting me choose from a menu which device or password manager I want to send my exported passkeys to.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The export feature scares me a bit because it will get abused by attackers, so I'm keen to see how they do that securely. Google is lagging behind on support in Android, but is working on APIs that will unlock the ability for Bitwarden to use passkeys on Android. It's slow but progress is being made!

  • @luigi3418
    @luigi3418 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sorry but saving the passkeys on Bitwarden in my opinion is less secure than saving them on your device, this is because correct me if I'm wrong, by saving them on Bitwarden if they ever enter my vault, with the passkeys they could access the sites they want, whereas if they are saved on the device (like a phone) to then use a passkey you also need biometric authentication, so it's an additional security check in addition, don't you think?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, you're correct. It's the trade-off between security and convenience, but it's the same risk of using a password manager with just passwords. You can still take steps to secure access to the vault to minimize the likelihood of someone gaining access.

  • @joeyc666
    @joeyc666 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for this explanation, Jason. Is this something you can do only for new accounts?
    For example, if I wanted to use passkeys on an existing social media account, is it a similar process? Sorry if I missed something in the video :)

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, you can do this for existing accounts as long as they support it. You should see it under security settings in the particular app

  • @petearmstrong2778
    @petearmstrong2778 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here is the scenario - passwords no longer used and a person now has 200 device-bound passkeys on a Windows laptop or Android (Apple may vary I don't know). You now get a new laptop - how do all these passkeys get reset on the new laptop? Cannot be manually.
    I guess the same question applies to a password manager - how to link a new device to use existing passkeys.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This is the key difference between device-bound and synced passkeys. Device-bound passkeys are stuck to that device. With Bitwarden's synced passkey solution (similar to what 1Password does), you can access it from any device as long as you have Bitwarden installed.

  • @TonyDL
    @TonyDL 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video, thank you! I've decided to give passkeys a try after being nagged a few times and now seeing your video... So I've done 2 of them and it seems seamless as you show. BUT how do I list my user accounts in Bitwarden where I've enabled a passkey? I don't want to lose track of which ones I've enabled it on. Also, if a website allows BOTH passwords and passkeys, isn't that less secure? Thanks!

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is the one downside with Bitwarden right now, it requires a separate entry. Given your username would be stored with the password entry, it's not a big issue.
      Every website now will have both. You just want to default to passkeys as it is phishing resistant.

    • @TonyDL
      @TonyDL 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@teachmecyber Hi, I don't really understand your answer as I see the passkey in the same entry. Still I don't know how to search for entries where a passkey was set. Also, I don't understand how passkeys as you describe are 'phishing resistant' if passwords are also allowed. Mabe another video? 🙂

  • @robtihanyi1155
    @robtihanyi1155 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Nice work Jason. I wish somebody who knows about computer stuff will at some point design an app to get a non computer user to be able to set up and use passkeys and indeed password managers. Nobody seems to understand that what seems like a "simple setup" to a computer user makes no sense at all to a non computer user. Until somebody designs a system to get this done the people who stand to gain the most from passkeys/password managers are the people who will continue to be the ones that are unable to access the service...just saying.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I've been thinking about doing a written tutorial to help in situations like this. While not perfect (e.g. I can't make the program easier), it may help with learning the new tool. Would that be useful?

  • @Rednunzio
    @Rednunzio 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    what does Bitwarden save to manage the passkey? The private key or what?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That's right, BItwarden is saving and securely storing the private key.

  • @puduville1
    @puduville1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. Remeber one thing till we get ride of less secure pwd recovery processes like via email recovery etc or we eliminate the pwd on the site( options that sites need to start providing) this will not be more secure.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, it will still be a fall back. But the more you use passkeys and stay consistent the better off you will be.

  • @DavidDLee
    @DavidDLee หลายเดือนก่อน

    I tried this on Windows, with both Bitwarden and Windows Hello.
    The latter does not sync to other devices, but it could use other devices (Android) to store the Passkey. Assuming Bitwarden allows syncing across devices (did not try, but this is the point, otherwise, it's next to useless).

  • @mkunikow
    @mkunikow 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok but if you generate passkey for google account -> it can set passkeys on all or your devices with one click.
    The question is who you trust more to store your passkeys ....

  • @Juan-sq9hb
    @Juan-sq9hb 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Will passkeys replace hardware authentication like Yubikey? what are the advantages of each?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Passkeys are the same technology as Yubikey. The main difference is that instead of the private key being stored on the yubikey, it's securely stored your laptop or mobile device. This implementation with Bitwarden (synchronized passkeys) allows for more flexibility to log in from different devices. Yubikey, is a device-bound passkey that you can only log in with the yubikey, so you have to have it with you. It's more secure but less flexible.

    • @Juan-sq9hb
      @Juan-sq9hb 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@teachmecyber Thanks a lot for your answer! :)

  • @jessejames586
    @jessejames586 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But sites that also allow user/password authentication negates the security that passkeys offer unless you can delete these credentials once you have a passkey setup for the site

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Potentially. But if you don't use them after setting them up and only use passkeys it is still more secure, especially against phishing attacks as long as you default to using passkeys

  • @MindCraftAcademy-my5fh
    @MindCraftAcademy-my5fh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i created bitwarden access using passkey, but still prompt to key in password.. not sure why, probably this is still in beta

  • @Richie_W
    @Richie_W 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wouldn't you want the username to be stored if you've got multiple accounts on a site? How are you going to login to a site if you can't remember what username you used when you registered?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      For passkeys in Bitwarden, you will need a new entry for each unique account on a website. The passkey stores the username in it, so you'll just have to manage the item in Bitwarden accordingly (e.g. just put it in the name of the item).

  • @Chicago48
    @Chicago48 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is the passkey device Specific? - or if I have a computer and phone will it merge across devices? Also does the passkey eliminate or delete my PASSWORD? AND what if you have 2-3 Google accounts like I do? I have a job gmail, a Google gmail, and another Goog gmail?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can set it up for multiple accounts, no issues there! You can have both the password and the passkey at the same time. You can set it up just for a specific device or use a password manager like 1Password and it will work across devices.

  • @GrouseHiker
    @GrouseHiker 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does the private passkey have to be remembered, or is it encrypted on the device? Does anything have to be remembered? It seems that if it's stored on the device, the the weak link is the device login... not the website login.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You don't have to remember anything new! The passkey is stored encrypted in the vault. The only thing you need to do is unlock Bitwarden to securely access the private key. You should set up Bitwarden to require strong MFA (you can also set this up with passkeys to your local device).

  • @gabsriel
    @gabsriel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm a newbie. It seems that Firefox does not support passkey except the hardware ones....what a shame

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, hopefully they get an update to support it soon!

  • @WE-vd8ux
    @WE-vd8ux 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    when i create a passkey like you in your video the public key will be saved in bitwarden.
    What about the private key which usually is saved on the local authenticator?
    what does sync of passkey mean?
    Sync the private key from one device to another? How will they be stored there? does this happen automatically`?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you create a passkey with Bitwarden, the private key is saved into your Bitwarden vault. The websites you configure passkeys with will get a copy of your public key.
      With Bitwarden's passkey implementation, the passkey stays in your vault which you can access from different devices.

  • @zoenagy9458
    @zoenagy9458 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    takes 6seconds to load the addon on i7+SSD+16GB RAM, unacceptable

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's odd, what OS are you using?

  • @vimalramachandran
    @vimalramachandran 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So, if I had to login on a computer where Bitwarden isn't installed, the passkey stored in Bitwarden cannot be used, right?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correct, in the current implementation. Future iterations with mobile support may change this if it allows you to point to your mobile app.

    • @breadone_
      @breadone_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@teachmecyber Wow. this, and the frankly amateurish UI for desktop was enough to make me switch to 1P

  • @Marco-ce8kr
    @Marco-ce8kr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Q: so If I have a password previously set in a website and later I set a passkey, I'll be able to use both or just the passkey ? and don't forget Nordpass tutorial for future videos

    • @sevenelven
      @sevenelven 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Websites usually let you choose your preferred way of signing in

    • @bigjoegamer
      @bigjoegamer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It depends on the website. Some websites will let you sign in with a password or a passkey, which means you can lose your passkey but still sign in with your password, or lose your password and still sign in with your passkey. Others will use your passkey as a form of 2-factor authentication, meaning you'll need your password and your passkey to log in. Others will replace your password with the new passkey, meaning you can only sign in with your passkey. I don't know if I've covered every scenario, but I hope passkeys become the thing that replaces passwords.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @bigjoegamer covered most of the scenarios you'll run into! The website may autodetect it (e.g. Gmail does this), others may ask you which method you want to sign in with (passwordless or password).

  • @DavidW-di1ie
    @DavidW-di1ie 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If a passkey is stored on the device, e.g., my laptop, and I get a new laptop, how does it migrate to the new device? I'm sure it's really simple, but I am not sure. Thanks.

  • @CapAlzheimers
    @CapAlzheimers 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    125% faster what does that even mean? If i normally log in in 100 seconds using bitwarden makes me log in in negative 25 seconds?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Okta's analysis showed that logins with a password on average took ~13 seconds. With passkeys, 3 seconds.

    • @CapAlzheimers
      @CapAlzheimers 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok, so faster, but the number 125% makes no sense. @@teachmecyber

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Just me getting my math wrong lol

  • @jbinfa7k
    @jbinfa7k 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is so quick that I lack the confidant I did it right...🙄

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you try to login with the passkey after you set it up?

  • @StijnHommes
    @StijnHommes 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You cite Okta, but you fail to mention that they're a biased party...
    I can only be thankful that passkeys are still not working on my copy of Bitwarden.
    It appears that is by design. Passkeys only work with the online vault, which is a million times less secure than my locally installed vault.
    No thanks. Got any alternative password managers I can try that didn't dilute their product security with passkey implementation?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Passkeys are the future. They are more secure than traditional passwords. I imagine most password managers are going to expand support for them as more websites adopt the technology.
      If you're an offline password vault person, KeePass, Bitwarden's offline version, or Passbolt are good options.

    • @StijnHommes
      @StijnHommes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@teachmecyber "They are more secure than traditional passwords." How so? When biometrics fail, the fallback is a simple PIN. Anyone close to you with bad intentions who has seen you unlock your phone can get access to your accounts as well when passkeys are enabled.
      Passkeys are basically 1FA when the bad actor has access to the device.

  • @cam_934
    @cam_934 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Real short list of supported browsers and sites, sounds like wait a year then have another look.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There's no reason not to start now. Protect the accounts you can and then revisit it from time to time to see what you can add.

  • @fumo7887
    @fumo7887 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Can log in 125% faster" - math does not work out. Negative time?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Heh yeah, I think I got my math wrong. Regardless, it's much faster and more secure!

  • @debnathmriganka2010
    @debnathmriganka2010 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir, I am fully new in Bitwarden, Today i am trying to login Bitwarden using password key using mobile phone but only shows pin option, but after that when i am going to login it always shows wrong key. Please help me how to use it properly. using Mobile Phone.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you provide more information on what's happening?

  • @Zaros1337
    @Zaros1337 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm even more confused about passkeys now than I was before watching.

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What can I help clear up? Have you seen the full video I posted on what passkeys are and how they work?

  • @blaaxz
    @blaaxz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No Firefox support?

    • @teachmecyber
      @teachmecyber  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've heard mixed results with Firefox. Are you having issues with it?

    • @therevanchistv
      @therevanchistv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@teachmecyber I am works on chromium based browsers only it seems.