I'm so sick and tired of this about the school funding! There are so many things that was promised to help funding in are schools. For one example is why some people voted to legalize Marijuana! So where's all that money going?
if this is a long term care benefit, how come that the benefit is only 36,000 us dollars as total in your life time? how can it be called long term? it does not cover even half a year of any care and then no more money ever after receiving the 36,000 maximum benefit.
These all sound like great initiatives. The state should not be burdening people with hidden (or overt) taxes to pay for these fringe pet political projects.
The wording of these initiatives is always so confusing. If you're "for" the initiative, you're often "for banning" some sort of legislation, which means you're against the underlying legislations. If you're "against" the legislation you need to vote "for"... the initiative which repeals it...
I'm so sick and tired of this about the school funding! There are so many things that was promised to help funding in are schools. For one example is why some people voted to legalize Marijuana! So where's all that money going?
by giving people the choice to opt out will kill the program makes me think maybe it’s not a good program
The program is already bankrupt even with everyone forced to pay into it.
Why not make it on on by default but keep the ability to opt out permanently open?
if this is a long term care benefit, how come that the benefit is only 36,000 us dollars as total in your life time? how can it be called long term? it does not cover even half a year of any care and then no more money ever after receiving the 36,000 maximum benefit.
These all sound like great initiatives. The state should not be burdening people with hidden (or overt) taxes to pay for these fringe pet political projects.
We need funding with accountability attached. What would something like that look like? Quarterly spending report?!
Thank you, King 5, for this public service to the voting public!
why shouldnt the state care about power/energy? That actually sounds so like something that should be their concern.
The wording of these initiatives is always so confusing. If you're "for" the initiative, you're often "for banning" some sort of legislation, which means you're against the underlying legislations. If you're "against" the legislation you need to vote "for"... the initiative which repeals it...
2:21 'We don't have a choice here. Mother Nature is making this choice'.
Welp. Never trust someone who tells you there are no choices.