Looks like he may have had a partial cross-control stall where the right wing dropped and he hit the right wheel so hard that it bounced and drove the left wing down. (When a plane makes a turn like like that, the inside wing moves slower through the air than the outside wing, therefore the inside wing has less relative lift and acts stalled.) Going down wind didn't help the situation either.
Looks like a short approach gone bad He's a little high, you can see him dip his nose to correct. that sets up a high sink rate, which he corrects with power. So far, so good. The problem occurs when he lands with a drift. even though he is lined up with the runway, and there is no crosswind (you can see the wind sock, actually landing with a bit of a tailwind, Which is why he was high) With no straight final to correct, the inertia from the turn is still carrying him towards the camera side of the runway, and he lands with a side-load on the main gear. The tailwind set him up, put him high, and closer than he planned.
Nguyen Xuan Son Because he can... granted, needed a bit more tries to get it quite right. Russian planes are not made to make pretty landings, and not made to depend so much on electronics and land assistance, like its Western counterparts.
Mindaugas I'm and not tryed to insult you, nazi - you already were insulted when born.. But you so dumb and pathetic to even recognize it :D Oh, so now I'm vatnik - ok, then you are klumpe! Slaves? Lol and it write person, which half population of country are cleaning toilets in the west .. Fascist? Putler?:D What else expect from full of shit and hatred, dumb nazi-fascist, whos so stupid to even think own head - only as a parrot - repeat on a templat other statements.. If "Putler" fascist - you must to admire him, as nazi-fascist supporter:) Amuses me, as the lowered nation of slaves - tries to barks, you remind me a small doggie which very loudly barks (and stinks) but on something else - isn't capable. BTW How Red-Dalia lives, still sucks black dick?;)
Speaking as a pilot, and control tower operator for many years who has watched thousands of approaches and landings, there was nothing unusual about the approach; everything was fine until right after touch-down. The gyrations after touch-down were sloppy, probably a wind gust caught the plane, possibly related to the tailwind, indicated by the windsock.
+Aloysius Anymouse To try to complete his turn and align with the runway he used rudder and cross controlled. That leads to an increased rate of descent and hitting one wheel first hence the nasty bounce. To counteract the rate of descent you can hear him increase thrust but too late it seems!
If that were an F-15, its undercarriage would have given way under immense stress. The Russkies build their aircraft precisely to bear this kinda stress when having a rough landing. Not to mention their aircraft robust design allows it to take off from makeshift runways. Ladies and gentlemen Su-35, a true flamboyant air combat fighter, unlike its "glass" counterparts from the West.
Johnson Malarkey Those "glass" western counterparts have taken hits from real AA weapons and landed back at the airfield (A-10) and an F15 lost 1 wing during a mid air collision and managed to land back at the airfield... i have never seen a SU-27 do that. it is true Russian planes are built very sturdy, but you are very wrong to be leave Western aircraft cant take a beating!
ShadowDDB1 Of course, no one questioned those attributes, I'm referring to the undercarriage, as I stated above, that particular landing wouldn't have gone so forgiving if it was an F-15 instead of that Sukhoi.
Johnson Malarkey After watching the video again, the stresses on the landing gear look pretty nominal during this landing... The decent rate on touchdown was low because the pilot flared just in time. and the hardest impact with the runway was the right rear wheel after the bounce... aircraft landing gear is made extremely strong because stuff like this is expected to happen once in a while. and while there is no doubt Russian fighters have more robust landing gear to use unpaved runways, an f15's landing gear would also not collapse in an event like this.
The pilot obviously made an error during the landing, which embarrassed him badly. This human error however in no way detracts from the fact that the SU 35 probably is the best fighter jet in the galaxy.
Ну и чего вы все раскудахтались? Не знаю как на западе, а в РФ это стандартный маневр, которому учат боевых пилотов. Заход на посадку с боевого разворота 90. Необходимая вещь в условиях реальных боевых действий, когда у противника есть переносные зенитные комплексы. При посадке и заходе на посадку на малой высоте по гражданскому сценарию, самолет наиболее уязвим для подобных систем (низкая скорость, низкая маневренность, малая дисстанция). В данном случае - это авиашоу, когда надо показать возможности планера. Да, произошла накладка, но при этом заметьте, самолет благополучно сел, что так же демонстрирует запас прочности силовых конструкций. Это все мелочи, "афганский заход" в исполнении истребителя это ерунда, поищите в интернете, как аналогичный маневр делает военно-транспортный самолет (если не изменяет память Ил)
+Indignant Reader What are you all cackling? Don't know how in the West, and in Russia this is a standard maneuver taught combat pilots. The approach to fighting turn 90. The necessary thing in real combat, when the enemy has portable anti-aircraft systems. When boarding and landing at low altitude in a civil scenario, the aircraft is most vulnerable for similar systems (low speed, low maneuverability, small distance). In this case, is the air show, when to show the possibilities of the glider. Yes, there was a cover, but in this note, the plane landed safely, which also demonstrates the robustness of the power structures. All this stuff, "Afghan approach" in the performance of a fighter is nonsense, look on the Internet, as a similar maneuver makes military transport aircraft (if memory serves il)
People do you even realize that this is a air show demonstration of a highly risk landing from a 90 degree angle... And any comment about pilot skills are ridicules...
чего раскудахтолись то?!Прочел сегодня мнение английского летчика летавшего на F18,так тот почему то решил,что в праве мо своей колокольни судить о профессионализме российких летчиков,улыбнуло.Предложил заходить на ВВП с прямой и выравниваться с высоты 100метров.Может именно поэтому и не могут выиграть данные пилоты ни одной войны толком?Аргентину подмяли большей частью благодаря американским разведданным по Фолклендам....
+Slava original а конкретней?Если мне,то отслужил не один год в ВВС ЗГВ с 91 по 94 на разных авиабазах и как заходили 29-е на посадку,что днем,что ночью наблюдал не в ютюбе...
Ваше профессиональное мнение это интересно. А рассуждения о "войнах" которые кто то выиграл и как выиграл уже перебор. Вот об этом я хотел сказать. Кроме того полагаю что Вы согласитесь что посадка не нормальная (превышение скорости захода?)...
+Slava original как раз и не перебор.Не знаю сколько Вам лет,служили Вы ли в армии и были Вы за границей или нет,а то знали бы,что не склонна "западная нация",как таковая к каким либо "виражам" не оговоренным в "спокойствии и монотонности" жизни.Потому то Париж и капитулировал через месяц Гитлеру,лишь бы не менять привычный образ жизни и потому "великая" Британия смогла отжать Фолкленды у Аргентины,только благодаря придательству США.Элементарно сравните выступление их них "Ангелов" и Стрижей с Витязями,разница в сложности программ налицо...Потому и улыбает высказывания подобных летунов...Повторю,что подобные заходы являются программой обучения рядового пилота ВВС...
@@sparadax да ты зольдат спец- наблюдающий за выпуском шасси из ВВС ЗГВ, отличающий угол атаки от угла сарая. Это ты для себя? th-cam.com/video/1UbkYhrSukc/w-d-xo.html
Jet fighters don't worry about wind direction??? Obviously you have no knowledge of aviation. I should learn by now the Internet is full of "experts". But what do I know, I'm just a pilot who has also worked many many air shows in my life.
Not a badass and not really good at much, but thanks! Aircraft land and take off into prevailing winds. What direction are prevailing winds out of relative to the aircraft in this video?
mbsevans He is landing with a slight tailwind/crosswind (you cant really tell precisely with this camera angle, and distance to it.. The most probable reason for the hard landing was because of his approach speed. If he had a bit more speed, the slight tailwind wouldn't be a problem. He seems to go on the power in his final turn/right after, but for some reason he cut's it even though you can see his decent rate is a bit high. I don't know why, or what happened.. you'd have to ask the pilot. Sorry for what i said earlier, had a bad day. deleted.
He is landing downwind with a slight crosswind component, hence the high approach speed and subsequent botched landing. Enough said. Now all you little boys get back to you video games which you think somehow empower you with all the knowledge of aviation and military related topics. Goofs.
mbsevans Sorry to dissapoint you, but i very much know how wind affects airplanes.. I fly gliders.. My biggest question is how you can determine his approach speed accurately?
--cLAsic-- - I fly gliders and we land with the wind all the time due to our runway layout for easy of operations. Sometimes up to 10 knots. Not a big deal. Dont know much about jets, but I'm betting I'm effected more by the wind than a jet on landing. To blame it on the landing direction is stupid. It was likely a pilot skill issue.
That kind of landing in the U.S or Canadian Military would cost you a lecture and a safety brief. that was just plain stupid. All pilots know that was a very poor landing.
While poorly executed, his short approach was not much different than a (simulated) power off landing that all commercial/military and higher pilots are required to demonstrate. I bet if an f16 did that we'd be look at a quarter million in wing damage
Looks like he may have had a partial cross-control stall where the right wing dropped and he hit the right wheel so hard that it bounced and drove the left wing down. (When a plane makes a turn like like that, the inside wing moves slower through the air than the outside wing, therefore the inside wing has less relative lift and acts stalled.) Going down wind didn't help the situation either.
Erick Lundin What the heck is this?? An intelligent and possibly true reason related to the video in a TH-cam comment?? Of all the cheek!
Cool, thank you for the information
Erick Lundin Thanks ! I was thinking that it looks like training for landing an aircraft carrier, but obvisously they don't have one :)
+Erick Lundin To counteract the rate of descent and cross control you can hear him increase thrust but too late it seems!
+Erick Lundin Wind lifted him off. They often approach tilted to the right side of the runway.
"A good landing is one you can walk away from.
A great landing is one where you can use the plane again"
Малька перевыделывался
Actually, the pilot said he saw a roach as he came in. He mentioned he hates roaches. He simply squished it and continued with his landing.
Где твой район?
Я понимаю, что летун - ас районного масштаба. Но самолет денег стоит, так-то.
Hopefully the pilot wore his brown flight suit that day .....
Looks like a short approach gone bad
He's a little high, you can see him dip his nose to correct. that sets up a high sink rate, which he corrects with power. So far, so good.
The problem occurs when he lands with a drift. even though he is lined up with the runway, and there is no crosswind (you can see the wind sock, actually landing with a bit of a tailwind, Which is why he was high)
With no straight final to correct, the inertia from the turn is still carrying him towards the camera side of the runway, and he lands with a side-load on the main gear. The tailwind set him up, put him high, and closer than he planned.
why this pilot choose to approach the piste from a 90 degree angle?
Nguyen Xuan Son Because he's an idiot. Like most of the Russians.
Mindaugas Very funny hear this from dumb labasas:)
Nguyen Xuan Son Because he can... granted, needed a bit more tries to get it quite right. Russian planes are not made to make pretty landings, and not made to depend so much on electronics and land assistance, like its Western counterparts.
Mindaugas
I'm and not tryed to insult you, nazi - you already were insulted when born.. But you so dumb and pathetic to even recognize it :D Oh, so now I'm vatnik - ok, then you are klumpe! Slaves? Lol and it write person, which half population of country are cleaning toilets in the west .. Fascist? Putler?:D What else expect from full of shit and hatred, dumb nazi-fascist, whos so stupid to even think own head - only as a parrot - repeat on a templat other statements.. If "Putler" fascist - you must to admire him, as nazi-fascist supporter:)
Amuses me, as the lowered nation of slaves - tries to barks, you remind me a small doggie which very loudly barks (and stinks) but on something else - isn't capable. BTW How Red-Dalia lives, still sucks black dick?;)
Nguyen Xuan Son My guess is - too much vodka...
Speaking as a pilot, and control tower operator for many years who has watched thousands of approaches and landings, there was nothing unusual about the approach; everything was fine until right after touch-down. The gyrations after touch-down were sloppy, probably a wind gust caught the plane, possibly related to the tailwind, indicated by the windsock.
+Aloysius Anymouse To try to complete his turn and align with the runway he used rudder and cross controlled. That leads to an increased rate of descent and hitting one wheel first hence the nasty bounce. To counteract the rate of descent you can hear him increase thrust but too late it seems!
Any idea why the pilot landed downwind?
If that were an F-15, its undercarriage would have given way under immense stress. The Russkies build their aircraft precisely to bear this kinda stress when having a rough landing. Not to mention their aircraft robust design allows it to take off from makeshift runways. Ladies and gentlemen Su-35, a true flamboyant air combat fighter, unlike its "glass" counterparts from the West.
Johnson Malarkey Yaaaaaaawn.
Boberrosini (splashes Bob's face with a bucket full of water) Mornin' :-p
Johnson Malarkey
Those "glass" western counterparts have taken hits from real AA weapons and landed back at the airfield (A-10)
and an F15 lost 1 wing during a mid air collision and managed to land back at the airfield...
i have never seen a SU-27 do that.
it is true Russian planes are built very sturdy,
but you are very wrong to be leave Western aircraft cant take a beating!
ShadowDDB1 Of course, no one questioned those attributes, I'm referring to the undercarriage, as I stated above, that particular landing wouldn't have gone so forgiving if it was an F-15 instead of that Sukhoi.
Johnson Malarkey
After watching the video again, the stresses on the landing gear look pretty nominal during this landing...
The decent rate on touchdown was low because the pilot flared just in time. and the hardest impact with the runway was the right rear wheel after the bounce...
aircraft landing gear is made extremely strong because stuff like this is expected to happen once in a while.
and while there is no doubt Russian fighters have more robust landing gear to use unpaved runways,
an f15's landing gear would also not collapse in an event like this.
His final approach is foolish at best. One lucky pilot. Poor decision making and high risk. Not good.
+heat bill - wrong, that was an excellent approach, he just ran into a wind gust right at touchdown.
+heat bill - wrong, that was an excellent approach, he just ran into a wind gust right at touchdown.
Verynice...i was talking about something far more foul and slightly more solid than vodka.
ПРОВЕРИТЬ НА АЛКОТЕСТЕРЕ !!!!
Skill + very good manueverably
plane
Так сесть это надо уметь,с заходом на ВВП с 90 градусов!
В 81-м полковая спарка так же зашла на посадку.Плюс один труп и минус один самолет
Frank Stallone any "Russian" comments?
I'm searching for that single person who disliked this video!!!!1
karthik vasishta ugranarasimha Now one more dislike... who is that ????
--cLAsic-- I just disliked it only to piss you off some mroe
He landed like one of those vultures at the end of Jungle Book.
Drinking?
The pilot obviously made an error during the landing, which embarrassed him badly. This human error however in no way detracts from the fact that the SU 35 probably is the best fighter jet in the galaxy.
Effective landing but a luck has played the role here
DamDam! you are right! his wing did hit the asphalt at 0:27. This could have been a disaster!
Wing hit the asphalt 0:27
i'll bet the grounds crew noticed an awful smell when the pilot opened the canopy after parking..
Vince Burden the smell of vodka all over the cockpit.
Ну и чего вы все раскудахтались? Не знаю как на западе, а в РФ это стандартный маневр, которому учат боевых пилотов. Заход на посадку с боевого разворота 90. Необходимая вещь в условиях реальных боевых действий, когда у противника есть переносные зенитные комплексы. При посадке и заходе на посадку на малой высоте по гражданскому сценарию, самолет наиболее уязвим для подобных систем (низкая скорость, низкая маневренность, малая дисстанция).
В данном случае - это авиашоу, когда надо показать возможности планера. Да, произошла накладка, но при этом заметьте, самолет благополучно сел, что так же демонстрирует запас прочности силовых конструкций.
Это все мелочи, "афганский заход" в исполнении истребителя это ерунда, поищите в интернете, как аналогичный маневр делает военно-транспортный самолет (если не изменяет память Ил)
+Indignant Reader What are you all cackling? Don't know how in the West, and in Russia this is a standard maneuver taught combat pilots. The approach to fighting turn 90. The necessary thing in real combat, when the enemy has portable anti-aircraft systems. When boarding and landing at low altitude in a civil scenario, the aircraft is most vulnerable for similar systems (low speed, low maneuverability, small distance).
In this case, is the air show, when to show the possibilities of the glider. Yes, there was a cover, but in this note, the plane landed safely, which also demonstrates the robustness of the power structures.
All this stuff, "Afghan approach" in the performance of a fighter is nonsense, look on the Internet, as a similar maneuver makes military transport aircraft (if memory serves il)
At least he didn't crash it...
Pilot error. That could have ended horribly. Nothing should EVER touch the ground other than the wheels.
Likely the last flight that pilot took.
Nice recovery! No PCS to Siberia for this Comrade Pilot!
karthik...my guess would be the pilot.
great manuver man
Just like my landings in War Thunder.
I hope for this dudes sake that the Russian fighter pilot jumpsuit is brown.
People do you even realize that this is a air show demonstration of a highly risk landing from a 90 degree angle... And any comment about pilot skills are ridicules...
That was amazing.
Soviet and Russian pilots are encouraged to do this.
чего раскудахтолись то?!Прочел сегодня мнение английского летчика летавшего на F18,так тот почему то решил,что в праве мо своей колокольни судить о профессионализме российких летчиков,улыбнуло.Предложил заходить на ВВП с прямой и выравниваться с высоты 100метров.Может именно поэтому и не могут выиграть данные пилоты ни одной войны толком?Аргентину подмяли большей частью благодаря американским разведданным по Фолклендам....
+sparadax "диванные войска" как Вы зае....
+Slava original а конкретней?Если мне,то отслужил не один год в ВВС ЗГВ с 91 по 94 на разных авиабазах и как заходили 29-е на посадку,что днем,что ночью наблюдал не в ютюбе...
Ваше профессиональное мнение это интересно. А рассуждения о "войнах" которые кто то выиграл и как выиграл уже перебор. Вот об этом я хотел сказать.
Кроме того полагаю что Вы согласитесь что посадка не нормальная (превышение скорости захода?)...
+Slava original как раз и не перебор.Не знаю сколько Вам лет,служили Вы ли в армии и были Вы за границей или нет,а то знали бы,что не склонна "западная нация",как таковая к каким либо "виражам" не оговоренным в "спокойствии и монотонности" жизни.Потому то Париж и капитулировал через месяц Гитлеру,лишь бы не менять привычный образ жизни и потому "великая" Британия смогла отжать Фолкленды у Аргентины,только благодаря придательству США.Элементарно сравните выступление их них "Ангелов" и Стрижей с Витязями,разница в сложности программ налицо...Потому и улыбает высказывания подобных летунов...Повторю,что подобные заходы являются программой обучения рядового пилота ВВС...
@@sparadax да ты зольдат спец- наблюдающий за выпуском шасси из ВВС ЗГВ, отличающий угол атаки от угла сарая. Это ты для себя? th-cam.com/video/1UbkYhrSukc/w-d-xo.html
In Russia, runway lands on you!
in Russia, the plane lands you.....
Jet fighters don't worry about wind direction??? Obviously you have no knowledge of aviation. I should learn by now the Internet is full of "experts". But what do I know, I'm just a pilot who has also worked many many air shows in my life.
Not a badass and not really good at much, but thanks! Aircraft land and take off into prevailing winds. What direction are prevailing winds out of relative to the aircraft in this video?
mbsevans He is landing with a slight tailwind/crosswind (you cant really tell precisely with this camera angle, and distance to it.. The most probable reason for the hard landing was because of his approach speed. If he had a bit more speed, the slight tailwind wouldn't be a problem.
He seems to go on the power in his final turn/right after, but for some reason he cut's it even though you can see his decent rate is a bit high. I don't know why, or what happened.. you'd have to ask the pilot.
Sorry for what i said earlier, had a bad day. deleted.
He is landing downwind with a slight crosswind component, hence the high approach speed and subsequent botched landing. Enough said. Now all you little boys get back to you video games which you think somehow empower you with all the knowledge of aviation and military related topics. Goofs.
mbsevans Sorry to dissapoint you, but i very much know how wind affects airplanes.. I fly gliders.. My biggest question is how you can determine his approach speed accurately?
--cLAsic-- - I fly gliders and we land with the wind all the time due to our runway layout for easy of operations. Sometimes up to 10 knots. Not a big deal. Dont know much about jets, but I'm betting I'm effected more by the wind than a jet on landing.
To blame it on the landing direction is stupid. It was likely a pilot skill issue.
lucky day....
someone seems that he doesn't know how to train pilots
Ввебнуться решил, лошарик, вертикальная скорость слишком высокая, отпрыгнул вверх, повредил крыло, видно, что это зелень, возомнившая себя асом
Only in Russia!!!! :D
Probably drunk.
комси комса!!!)) от винта!
лихо. лайк.
Ur doin it rong
That kind of landing in the U.S or Canadian Military would cost you a lecture and a safety brief. that was just plain stupid. All pilots know that was a very poor landing.
+Dogmeat1950 - sometimes a wind gust throws a surprise at the pilot. That was an excellent approach until the wind gust hit.
Срећа...
Итересно, кто пилот
Уже другой)
A little Bondo and a little duct tape and she'll be good as new.
Вот чертёнок-чирканул🛬
While poorly executed, his short approach was not much different than a (simulated) power off landing that all commercial/military and higher pilots are required to demonstrate. I bet if an f16 did that we'd be look at a quarter million in wing damage
Crazy Ican :)
Classic Russia