In the early 2000s, Tiktaalik was discovered; it could have been the first tetrapod on land. It is the “missing link” between fish and early tetrapods. Anyone interested in paleontology or paleobiology should read some of Dr. Jenny Clack’s work on tetrapods; she, unfortunately, passed away a few years ago, but her work is groundbreaking for the work of vertebrate biology.
Panderichthys is also interesting because it shows the bridge from basal lobe finned fish to tiktaalik even if it didn’t evolve into tiktaalik it still shows the progression that it’s relatives had towards life on land which i think is really cool
Structural rigidity, a blood cell factory and a calcium reservoir, skeletal systems are the foundation of vertebrates. I wonder how an insect based higher intelligence life form would appear and function
Insects with Earth-like limitations? Hivemind is my guess. I doubt that individuals with Earth insect characteristics could reach sapience. Even absent the size limits (e.g. in a high oxygen atmosphere) there's problems. Open circulatory systems probably wont cut it to run advanced individual brains...
Give it time...if it's advantageous to our species, it will develop...of course, that'll be eons in the future & we'll never have it, but that's life...
Fun fact: early tetrapods *did* have three eyes(Although the third was mostly just a natural calendar, it can still see), and lizards have them too. It’s called a “parietal eye”
Depends on how we decide to define "success", really. If the ability to manipulate local matter to its extremes, then maybe yes. If the survival period is to be taken into account, then we surely have a long long way to go, lol. I wonder what actually matters to the system most...
@@SpencerjonesBoxing That really depends. We might be large and hold a lot of power, but there are creatures who have not evolved for over 400 million years and are still flourishing to this day. They are so perfect that they could adapt to any changes over all those years without needing to change themselves. Surely they would be more successful than us, no?
@@_________________142 yeah that’s what I thought like a 🐊 for example ,doesn’t need to change because it’s very effective . I just wonder what the success is , period of time survived or what’s accomplished in a period of time
There is a good doc on Jenny Clack who did alot of work on Acanthostega and Ichthyostega in this playlist. Per Ahlberg (in this video was her doctoral students) th-cam.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjomaNEGNHjb1r8YWbUzVIskd.html
I know why they went from water to land. Waiting for insects to fall into the water to get their protein was tedious. It would be much easier to catch them on the reeds by the water's edge where they go to lay their larvae in the water.
I cringe whenever someone says something like, "The first creature to walk on land." There were probably intermediates that predate this guy who walked on land. Intermediates who left no fossils and we'll never know about.
Don't omit the 'creature' part! That clearly has connotations of a created thing, and _that_ alludes to religious bs. As for 'first', just as 'blue whale is the largest animal of all time' _may_ be intended to mean 'that we know of', so it is with 'first', though not always.
its depressing... milloins of years of struggle and now im here in a time with no posibillitys to continue this line because of modern standarts. the onlycthing i can do to thank evolution for my existence taken away...
My guess is that the land around the waters had abundant non-vertebral animals like insects and worms for the first amphibians to grow fat upon. Maybe some even snacked on the plants themselves.
BTW this is a slightly inaccurate documentary because they said that that amphibian was the first creature to walk on land however euripterids (sea scorpions) were the first creatures to crawl onto land and actually breath air on land.
Ichthyostega did not know what thirst was, he must have learned by force of evolution, because feeling his whole body dry was already too late, he must have felt it in his mouth
I mean that's obviously the first thing that ever happens when something big with life occurs. The first cell ever actually roared so loudly that it vibrated into 2 cells and making cell division possible.
I doubt those amphibians developed complex enough respiratory systems to roar, if I am correct in order to roar animals have to use some complex vocal chords which early tetrapodamorphs did not have.
The episode is good, but the script is severely Lamarckian in verb usage: "developed X in order to Y". WE know that this was not how things worked, yet the language suggests fish developed a feature in order to realize its use. No, no, no...!
BFDT -- Thanks for bringing attention to the usage of phrases. They do matter. Even though the people using them in a scientific documentary as this mean well and know how it really works, the problem is with people not well informed and just listening to the words used.
@@AmitDebnath09 Lamarck's view of evolution is a giraffe that grew a longer neck because trees became longer, like developing X in order to do Y. But Darwin said (and I salute him) the long neck was a mutated change in DNA which caused them to grew longer necks, and they passed this gene on, while the shorter necks died. It's always DNA that changes first, if it doesn't species just simply die off. So these species didn't develop X to do Y. Some of them just got X and could use them for Y which helped them, they passed on their genes, while the others didn't, and tada: Evolution!
I notice that a great deal of people who aren't open to the idea of evolution, or are ignorant of it, become acceptant once this distinction is made clear. Once explained clearly and honestly, we see evolutionary processes are very common in every-day life - like animal and plant breeding. I do understand now why many anti-evolutionist are unconvinced by the theory, because it's explained poorly, that evolution is somehow a conscious thing and not physiological efficiency-based mutations over a long period of time. It's simply that million "random" mutations appear in every species all the time, some beneficial and some not. The least adaptable "mutants" die or cease to reproduce in somesuch way, while the beneficiaries continue through the gene pool. Like throwing things at a wall to "see" what sticks, blindly.
The evolution of organs was the most mindblowing thing. They kinda skipped a lot of steps though, also this freshwater habitat thingy, never heard about it.. probably not internationally confirmed I suppose?
Brendan Mc Kee No, he's focusing on a certain ecosystem, like today there is tropical forests, at that time there also was. The same applies to hot deserts, cold deserts, temperate lands. Maybe the concentration of each was a bit different on each era, but there was definitely a bit of all.
@@Lingist081 As I thought; you don't understand what your ignorant comments imply. 1. "Because vertebrae is outdated" - Nonsense, vertebrae is a term in anatomy, the plural of vertebra. It doesn't refer to taxonomic groups. 2. Back to your original tripe regarding taxonomy. "Should use the term chordate not vertebrate" - Vertebrate is still a valid term in biology, just as chordate is. - One is NOT synonymous with the other! Not all chordates are vertebrates! This point alone makes your suggestion a flawed, ignorant mess.
What? That is more Lemarkian, you dont will mutation. Every adaptation level dies out, but the lines that adapt from it survive for a while to create more altered decendent lines until they die off. No particular level of modification dies off. Evolution is not a "stairway to heaven", a line can modify degenerativly to be simplified and still survive or it can die off. Evolution is essentially "modification with shared ancestry". Shit, Koalas have evolved to be retarded lol and have a nich diet with terrible digestion and constant contraction of chlamydia. Be cautious of Lemarkian evolution and "Social Darwinism" they are unfounded psuedo science usually touted to promote bullshit psuedo science "survival of the fittest" philosophies used for bigotry and opression. th-cam.com/play/PLXJ4dsU0oGMLnubJLPuw0dzD0AvAHAotW.html
So how do the innate inarticulate cells "decide" what to experiment next, and then still, how do they go about accomplishing it? They're not intelligent as we know, and these fish definitely didn't make a conscious effort in their evolution. Leads me to believe there could possibly be a type of consciousness attached to nature itself that everything is unknowingly enveloped and living in.
@@tylerdavis8834 The cells don't decide anything. Mutations happen all the time due to solar radiation, chemical interference, viruses, and replication errors. If the mutation is positive or neutral, it will be passed down. If the mutation is negative, it will lead to less reproductive success, and eventually (usually) be extinguished.
@@tylerdavis8834 They don't. It's led by random changes, and if it gives an advantage, it stays. That's why some animals like the horseshoe crab have survived for hundreds of millions of years.
Simple, insects (and arachnids, also) are terrestrial arthropods which evolved from aquatic arthropods (crustaceans) which predated the emergence of vertebrates in the form of fish -- they had the advantage over the earliest vertebrates re. land adaptation because the latter were still proto-fish (or even more-primitive) and, therefore, needed more time to evolve, adapt to, and ultimately transcend, barriers in nature (fresh water environments vs. the saltier oceans, and dry land beyond that) which challenged their physiologies and the systems which sustained them. Those first ancient terrestrial arthropods had solved those problems long before the first amphibious vertebrates ventured onto dry land long-term.
they had very primitive lungs (nothing like ours,but still lungs) and their armor protected them from the incedibily hot sun,that meant the could spend much more time on land than any other animal at the time
but unlike the fish,they didn't have any memory,so they either followed the fish there during mating season (the fish's mating grounds were small pools of water separated from the sea,this meant they would be safe during the process),or they just got there by chance
Should be called the evolution of tetrapods. Its missing too many early steps (i.e. sea squirts, hagfish, etc) to say this is about vertebrate evolution.
In the early 2000s, Tiktaalik was discovered; it could have been the first tetrapod on land. It is the “missing link” between fish and early tetrapods. Anyone interested in paleontology or paleobiology should read some of Dr. Jenny Clack’s work on tetrapods; she, unfortunately, passed away a few years ago, but her work is groundbreaking for the work of vertebrate biology.
They didn't shy away from hyperbole on this one either did they? made a few definitive statements on virtually unprovable claims.
@@mrdgenerateA creationist, I see.
Panderichthys is also interesting because it shows the bridge from basal lobe finned fish to tiktaalik even if it didn’t evolve into tiktaalik it still shows the progression that it’s relatives had towards life on land which i think is really cool
@@mileswithau Attack the argument, not the arguer. Damn assoomer.
@@mileswithau That might be giving them too much credit.
These documentaries are works of art.
They are works of science but of art?
lol. The narrator said “ecco” systems instead of “eco” systems. Seriously?
"specialist on ancient fish" the title that i need and want
Bro took "grow a spine" quite literally.
It grew a spine because it's parents had spines too.
@@arcguardian yes, this does make sense.
Structural rigidity, a blood cell factory and a calcium reservoir, skeletal systems are the foundation of vertebrates. I wonder how an insect based higher intelligence life form would appear and function
wow..
jumpung spiders and bees are good examples of arthropod intelligence. i guess their limit is their size
I imagine it'd originate from some of the hive insects, they already have the social structure part readied for them
Insects with Earth-like limitations?
Hivemind is my guess. I doubt that individuals with Earth insect characteristics could reach sapience.
Even absent the size limits (e.g. in a high oxygen atmosphere) there's problems. Open circulatory systems probably wont cut it to run advanced individual brains...
@@misanthropichumanist4782 great point!!
🌲Taxonomies referenced in this video:
• 0:07 | Pikaia gracilens (species)
• 4:00 | Taraspid? (unknown)
• 4:01 | Lingulida (order)
• 4:50 | Paramecium (genus)
• 5:30 | Pteraspis (genus)
• 8:35 | Cheirolepis (genus)
• 12:23 | Eusthenopteron (genus)
• 15:40 | Acanthostega (genus)
• 18:40 | Ichthyostega (genus)
5:30 is "pteraspis"
@@SaturnineXTS Thank you!
@@randallarms5295icthyostega is clearly the ancestors of frogs
@@SaturnineXTSVERTEBRATE QUIZ🦛🐣🦉🪶🐸🐡🐤🦖🐬🦭
thank you so much I’ve been looking for cheirolepis for like an hour but the subtitles said cairolepus
My dumbass legit read this as
*“The Evolution of Vegetables”*
Anomalocaris was the true known chad of the seas
They were jawless fish.
@@alphapham2060 anomalocaris ain't a fish
@@alphapham2060 thatsh not good informashion they were giant sea monkeys.
You mean wimp...
@@dreamsprayanimation No, They are Crustacean-Like Creatures...
If Terespids had just tried a little harder, been a bit more careful, and more clever, then today we would all have three eyes.
But, no. 😡
Give it time...if it's advantageous to our species, it will develop...of course, that'll be eons in the future & we'll never have it, but that's life...
Fun fact: early tetrapods *did* have three eyes(Although the third was mostly just a natural calendar, it can still see), and lizards have them too. It’s called a “parietal eye”
Dumb terespids
@@Road_Rashwhat?
rip those paramecium
even after bursting in the petri-dish
Amazing how we have been here such a small amount of time , our success as a species is yet to be compared
Depends on how we decide to define "success", really. If the ability to manipulate local matter to its extremes, then maybe yes. If the survival period is to be taken into account, then we surely have a long long way to go, lol. I wonder what actually matters to the system most...
@@piratedgenes yeah true , good point . Any more thought on this?
@@SpencerjonesBoxing That really depends. We might be large and hold a lot of power, but there are creatures who have not evolved for over 400 million years and are still flourishing to this day. They are so perfect that they could adapt to any changes over all those years without needing to change themselves. Surely they would be more successful than us, no?
@@_________________142 yeah that’s what I thought like a 🐊 for example ,doesn’t need to change because it’s very effective . I just wonder what the success is , period of time survived or what’s accomplished in a period of time
@@SpencerjonesBoxing That's just up to the person, something interesting to think about though for sure.
Our spines don't get enough credit, I'm sitting up straight as I type this,lol
🦐my spine
Well except your spine is all twisted in doing so.
Points for identifying the narrator.
Do I understand correctly? Fresh water was crucial for the development of vertebrates?? Amazing :-O
@Chewy Ltd It was discovered again in East London, South Africa (1938)
the music really gives a sense of nostalgia, mystery, and wonder
So the one with the backbone survived, always the case!
When the going gets tough, you gotta learn to stand for yourself. Some of the fishes remembered that and they evolved to have legs to stand on
Many politicians seem to thrive without one....
@@drewthompson7457, like the maggots they are.
The music alone is phenomenal.
I wished i was a giant salamander instead of a human. Their lives seems very nice and flowy.
This is truly fascinating!
i want a 2nd part..omg it's really helpful.
There is a good doc on Jenny Clack who did alot of work on Acanthostega and Ichthyostega in this playlist. Per Ahlberg (in this video was her doctoral students)
th-cam.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjomaNEGNHjb1r8YWbUzVIskd.html
I know why they went from water to land.
Waiting for insects to fall into the water to get their protein was tedious.
It would be much easier to catch them on the reeds by the water's edge
where they go to lay their larvae in the water.
1:32 my man really said "being human is gae, return to fish"
I agree 😭
great storytelling, thanks!!
1 minute in- wow, whoever composed the music for this really went beyond their requirements. Nice job!
I cringe whenever someone says something like, "The first creature to walk on land." There were probably intermediates that predate this guy who walked on land. Intermediates who left no fossils and we'll never know about.
Don't omit the 'creature' part! That clearly has connotations of a created thing, and _that_ alludes to religious bs. As for 'first', just as 'blue whale is the largest animal of all time' _may_ be intended to mean 'that we know of', so it is with 'first', though not always.
Yeah, I guess so, but it still doesn't bother me.
@@Dr.IanPlectso in ur religion, creatures don't exist?
Pikaia is my favorite Cambrian animal.
its depressing... milloins of years of struggle and now im here in a time with no posibillitys to continue this line because of modern standarts. the onlycthing i can do to thank evolution for my existence taken away...
shut up
Reproduction is overrated...don't worry about it...
Cya Ron
Repopulating is overrated
congrats on 20k
My guess is that the land around the waters had abundant non-vertebral animals like insects and worms for the first amphibians to grow fat upon. Maybe some even snacked on the plants themselves.
Yes! Invertebrates had dominated flight before vertebrates could even walk. Imagine land being dominated by vegetation and giant bugs
very interesting theories on evolution of vertibrae. Thanks for showing us this.
Narrated by the one and only Optimum Prime
Stacy Keach more like
So piss is what allowed creatures to evolve in fresh water and beyond.
I love this music
Very 90’s
BTW this is a slightly inaccurate documentary because they said that that amphibian was the first creature to walk on land however euripterids (sea scorpions) were the first creatures to crawl onto land and actually breath air on land.
This show is about the evolution of vertebrates. Amphibians were indeed the very first animals within the vertebrate lineage to walk on land.
yea i know that its talking about vertebrates but its inaccurate in saying that vertebrates were first to walk on land that's what i meant.
Amphibians were not to walk on land, fish were the first vertebrates to walk on land.
sick dece, the fish did not walk, but instead pulled themselves with their fins.
sea scorpion are arthropods
Ichthyostega did not know what thirst was, he must have learned by force of evolution, because feeling his whole body dry was already too late, he must have felt it in his mouth
It's been a long strange trip yo
THANKS ALOT GRAMPA!!! NOW I HAVE TO PAY TAXES BECAUSE OF YOU!!!!!
What year did this originally come out?
1995
omg that cellicide caught me off guard
So mr. Garrison was right , basically I'm just a monkey fish frog
That little slurp at 1:22 had me dying.
What’s with Taco Bell at the beginning?
🔔 ???
PRAISE EVOLUTION!!!!!!!!
Why?
Elvolv3 to crab
Feels like yesterday
we want more
Pteraspis; so you don't have to spend ages like me looking them up :)
thanks!
thank you !!
Thanks a bunch!
you're a life saver
Could you maybe spell out the name at 11.30? 😅
Very good video.
this is somehow very moving
The first vertebrates get out of the water and the first thing they do is roar?!??!
I mean that's obviously the first thing that ever happens when something big with life occurs. The first cell ever actually roared so loudly that it vibrated into 2 cells and making cell division possible.
I doubt those amphibians developed complex enough respiratory systems to roar, if I am correct in order to roar animals have to use some complex vocal chords which early tetrapodamorphs did not have.
What's this from? I'd like to watch the whole thing
What series is this from? I remember seeing it
Planet of life
All vertebrates derived from notocorde.
I'm very interested about the soundtrack of this documentary. Does anyone know where it comes from?
Team J I think
The boring elevator music people, most likely...
sounds like shadow of the colossus music
@@cocopus Yeah, it does! That's what made me want to find it
@@Gitaroo did you find it?
Vertebrate Lore
The episode is good, but the script is severely Lamarckian in verb usage: "developed X in order to Y". WE know that this was not how things worked, yet the language suggests fish developed a feature in order to realize its use. No, no, no...!
BFDT -- Thanks for bringing attention to the usage of phrases. They do matter. Even though the people using them in a scientific documentary as this mean well and know how it really works, the problem is with people not well informed and just listening to the words used.
"Creatures" instead of "lifeforms"
"Experiment" instead of "evolutionary radiation"
Why do they write scripts that misrepresent evolution in this way?
Interesting you mentioned this. Would you care to explain further? i'm genuinely curious.
@@AmitDebnath09 Lamarck's view of evolution is a giraffe that grew a longer neck because trees became longer, like developing X in order to do Y. But Darwin said (and I salute him) the long neck was a mutated change in DNA which caused them to grew longer necks, and they passed this gene on, while the shorter necks died. It's always DNA that changes first, if it doesn't species just simply die off. So these species didn't develop X to do Y. Some of them just got X and could use them for Y which helped them, they passed on their genes, while the others didn't, and tada: Evolution!
I notice that a great deal of people who aren't open to the idea of evolution, or are ignorant of it, become acceptant once this distinction is made clear. Once explained clearly and honestly, we see evolutionary processes are very common in every-day life - like animal and plant breeding. I do understand now why many anti-evolutionist are unconvinced by the theory, because it's explained poorly, that evolution is somehow a conscious thing and not physiological efficiency-based mutations over a long period of time. It's simply that million "random" mutations appear in every species all the time, some beneficial and some not. The least adaptable "mutants" die or cease to reproduce in somesuch way, while the beneficiaries continue through the gene pool. Like throwing things at a wall to "see" what sticks, blindly.
The evolution of organs was the most mindblowing thing. They kinda skipped a lot of steps though, also this freshwater habitat thingy, never heard about it.. probably not internationally confirmed I suppose?
No lab research in my future I guess. I can't even watch a paramecium die 😢
Evolution is amazing!!!
1. Pikaia
2. Pteraspis
3. Cheirolepis
4. Eusthenopteron
5. Acanthostega
6. Ichthyostega
1. I
2. Try
3. Hard
4. To
5. Sound
6. Smart
Thanks Stacy Keach.
12:24 Looks like a bow fin!
Geez, this video is basically just: "We are in a place with terrible weather. Ages ago, it was tropical. Be jealous." haha
Brendan Mc Kee No, he's focusing on a certain ecosystem, like today there is tropical forests, at that time there also was. The same applies to hot deserts, cold deserts, temperate lands. Maybe the concentration of each was a bit different on each era, but there was definitely a bit of all.
Real People nah, it was hella hot and humid then.
Temperate>Tropical.
Change my mind
@@froglover4203 Boreal>Temperate>Tropical
Should use the term chordate not vertebrate
why
@@Dr.IanPlect Because vertebrae is outdated
@@Lingist081 As I thought; you don't understand what your ignorant comments imply.
1. "Because vertebrae is outdated"
- Nonsense, vertebrae is a term in anatomy, the plural of vertebra. It doesn't refer to taxonomic groups.
2. Back to your original tripe regarding taxonomy. "Should use the term chordate not vertebrate"
- Vertebrate is still a valid term in biology, just as chordate is.
- One is NOT synonymous with the other! Not all chordates are vertebrates! This point alone makes your suggestion a flawed, ignorant mess.
I wish I new what the name of this documentary this clip was from?
Ancient Oceans from the Planet of Life series by Discovery, 1995
@@agenthoneywellThank You
The last two minutes were creepy
Evolution is adaptation by trial and error. Try everything you can do and nature desides which ones survive.
What? That is more Lemarkian, you dont will mutation. Every adaptation level dies out, but the lines that adapt from it survive for a while to create more altered decendent lines until they die off. No particular level of modification dies off.
Evolution is not a "stairway to heaven", a line can modify degenerativly to be simplified and still survive or it can die off. Evolution is essentially "modification with shared ancestry". Shit, Koalas have evolved to be retarded lol and have a nich diet with terrible digestion and constant contraction of chlamydia.
Be cautious of Lemarkian evolution and "Social Darwinism" they are unfounded psuedo science usually touted to promote bullshit psuedo science "survival of the fittest" philosophies used for bigotry and opression.
th-cam.com/play/PLXJ4dsU0oGMLnubJLPuw0dzD0AvAHAotW.html
Rng gods
So how do the innate inarticulate cells "decide" what to experiment next, and then still, how do they go about accomplishing it? They're not intelligent as we know, and these fish definitely didn't make a conscious effort in their evolution. Leads me to believe there could possibly be a type of consciousness attached to nature itself that everything is unknowingly enveloped and living in.
@@tylerdavis8834 The cells don't decide anything. Mutations happen all the time due to solar radiation, chemical interference, viruses, and replication errors. If the mutation is positive or neutral, it will be passed down. If the mutation is negative, it will lead to less reproductive success, and eventually (usually) be extinguished.
@@tylerdavis8834 They don't. It's led by random changes, and if it gives an advantage, it stays. That's why some animals like the horseshoe crab have survived for hundreds of millions of years.
I can't believe I'm related to that lizzard
Chris Cristian we are all, and its not a lizzard
We all have that relative we are ashamed of.
@@renanfelipedossantos5913 LMAO
What is this documentary called?
Planet of life
Interesting video thanks
how did insects live there if no creature got out of the water yet
Plants and insects got out of the water at around the same time.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141106143709.htm
Simple, insects (and arachnids, also) are terrestrial arthropods which evolved from aquatic arthropods (crustaceans) which predated the emergence of vertebrates in the form of fish -- they had the advantage over the earliest vertebrates re. land adaptation because the latter were still proto-fish (or even more-primitive) and, therefore, needed more time to evolve, adapt to, and ultimately transcend, barriers in nature (fresh water environments vs. the saltier oceans, and dry land beyond that) which challenged their physiologies and the systems which sustained them. Those first ancient terrestrial arthropods had solved those problems long before the first amphibious vertebrates ventured onto dry land long-term.
Different Clade. Crusteaceans and insects are what you're looking for.
"Insects" got out first, then Tetrapoda. But it's a VERY common misnomer for people to say Tetrapoda was first
Narrators should learn how to pronounce words before making a video.
According to a brief comment in the video, insects were already land animals. How did that happen?
they had very primitive lungs (nothing like ours,but still lungs) and their armor protected them from the incedibily hot sun,that meant the could spend much more time on land than any other animal at the time
but unlike the fish,they didn't have any memory,so they either followed the fish there during mating season (the fish's mating grounds were small pools of water separated from the sea,this meant they would be safe during the process),or they just got there by chance
Not a very hard thing for insects to do, much much harder for fish however. They evolved to go eat land plants.
One of my favorite pokemon anorith is based off of anomalocaris
So... To have a heart, we have to show some backbone...
Cool
Should be called the evolution of tetrapods. Its missing too many early steps (i.e. sea squirts, hagfish, etc) to say this is about vertebrate evolution.
Kent hovind needs to watch this video
Did I just witness the birth of urinating?
Anomalocalris was the furthest relative of crabs and shrimps
Lampreys don't have a backbone of bones, just some elements of cartilage. But they seem to do fine in freshwater without it.
What is the full name of this documentary?
Planet of Life
So in a scientific sense, the meek already inherited the Earth (fresh water) through notochords and kidneys...
i wanna go virtual
0:40 same, tbh
11:00 twilight princess goron mines?
Eh oui nous descendons de vers des rivières.
Why isn't R Ermy Lee not narrating this?
He isn't.
Because he's dead 😐
😄 it's not that type of Marine life, that type has alot more AA meetings in its evolution
That sound the first man in the video made. "*snort* extinct."
8:22 I know this music!
How vertebrate evolve on Earth
Pee
Fun video, but goddamn if his pronunciation of anomalocaris is making me insane. “Anomalo” as in Anomalous, bro.
2 years later and it’s still making me insane
Evolution is just praising RNG gods
Lol love the music
So with lungs developed, we got a leg up. FINis. I'm done RIBbing🙂
❤水是生命之源
1:32 back to monke is for weaks
This is very kool to me
Brilliant, Try and compete with that, god. I'm waiting./
We already have. God has been destroyed numerous times. You're just too arrogant to realise it.
It don’t matter befo dat 🦠 it was him!
With out him won’t be nuthang!
"The first fish with a backbone" - every other fish before that was a pussy~
Fucking slaughtered those peramecium