Dr. Troxel was a fascinating guest. His voice and way of speaking is very calm and relaxing. If the science thing doesn't work out, he'd be great at ASMR (no ear licking necessary).
really i found the opposite to be the case, you actively have to expend energy to even make out what he´s saying. pretty much the opposite of relaxing for me. kind of like listening to very low bitrate internet radio back in the day
@@symmetrie_bruchI found this too. I had to shut it off (even though interesting) It sounded to me like affected vocal fry. I can’t stand ASMR as well.
I always thought that with JWST they actually did simulated observations on stuff they cant look at . As for supercomputer simulations I remember when they first used various machines to do this but couldnt get it to work because they didnt know about certain things .
thank you, i thought i was the weird one with all these strange people praising his voice and how relaxing it is. it´s very much the opposite of relaxing to me. you have to actively expend energy to even make out what he´s saying. my first thought really was oh poor guy he seems quite young yet he obviously is just recovering from a stroke and is speaking over early 2000s very low bit rate internet radio.
Dr. Troxel has a very good Rod Serling-like narration voice. Hopefully his universe simulation won’t develop its own malevolent entity like happened to the universe simulating scientist in an episode of the Twilight Zone. *AI says it was the Outer Limits episode called The Sandbox.
@@Milan_Openfeint disagree, launch loop is nice but best only for orbital launch. You can get out of orbit but your speed wouldn't be so great. a trip to mars would still take months. a space fountain is multiple times the size and needs a lot more energy. to me it's just impracticable. space elevator needs building materials we do have yet. and it's not like we don't try to build high. but has anyone reached 1km yet? The skyhook idea has had some big changes since the first time it was proposed. are you sure you are up to date about it? or have you been discarding it ever since you 1st heard about it and thought it was stupid? skyhooks are meant to be the infrastructure to travel the solar system. not just sending stuff out from earth. I give launch loop a 👍 since it would be great to have it in combination with a skyhook. much better then the other 2.
@@laladieladada About space elevator, it's not a tower, it's a rope, so it doesn't matter if we have 1km or 2km tall towers. About sky hook, if by recent development you mean that it ends at 10km altitude then I did not hear about that before but it still doesn't make any sense to me. How would you keep it spinning? How would you maintain its altitude in a way that is cheaper than lots of rockets? How do you deal with the oscillations caused by air drag? Does the rope even have enough inertia to accelerate cargo to orbital speed? My gut feeling says that this is harder than space elevator, your feeling may be different.
The topography of the universe over time and how it changes nothing but our perceptions of time and distance. If dark matter changes states between a liquid and gaseous state then there would have been a time where almost all of the dark matter cooled, condensed and collapsed. This liquid state contraction could possibly have led to direct collapse black holes and galaxies. The condensing of dark matter may have also contributed to that uniformity of temperature. If the dark matter was in its liquid state then baryonic and dark matter would have been much more concentrated. This would have resulted in deeper gravity wells. The time in these gravity wells to us would seem to be moving slower to us. But due to dark matter condensing the baryonic matter would also have been cooled and rushing together. Once stars were formed and black holes became active the ratio of liquid to gaseous dark matter would have decreased over time thus affecting the evolution of particle masses. And making the gravity wells progressively shallower and larger in diameter over time. Galaxy clusters would have evaporated almost all of their liquid dark matter resulting in the shallowest part of the gravity well being near the canter of the cluster. Also part of redshift is due to the difference depth of the average gravity well at that point in time compared to now. The slope of that line would also have decreased over time. As vaporized dark matter spread further from the gravity wells the slope there would have increased (dark energy). Light red shifts as it climbs out of a gravity well. Thus the further you go back in time the more light is redshifted. This would leave everything the same with the exception of our perception that the universe is expanding. Also if a big portion of the redshift is from climbing out of a deeper gravity well then we are not looking as far into the past as we think. Phase transitioning dark matter could also answer several of the biggest questions in cosmology. Spacetime is flat but has the equivalent of topography due to the cumulative effect of gravity on the passage of light through spacetime. It is probably more due to the time portion of spacetime than the actual speed of light. Light slows down in different materials I believe that the concentration of dark matter affects the speed of light. In the Virgo cluster there is a 6 degree area that has over a hundred blueshifted galaxies most of which I believe are actually in a filament that climbs into the void behind where they appear to be. This could be the key to figuring out the distance to DM concentration ratio. The early universe was much denser and the gravity wells much deeper. Light red shifts as it climbs out of a gravity well so part of our distance and time perception is due to light climbing out of the deeper gravity wells. The cosmic web was formed by condensing dark matter across spacetime. Once stars began fusion and black holes became active the dark matter began to evaporate. Resulting in progressively shallower gravity wells since then. Redshift minus the difference in gravity well depth equals actual distance. This may be proven by over a hundred blue shifted galaxies that are located within a 6 degree area of the Virgo cluster. I believe these are in a filament rising out of the other side of the cluster into a void area. Because the filament is rising gravitationally toward a void the increasing blueshift makes these galaxies look like the are in the Virgo cluster.
Dr. Troxel must be in a library lol 🤫
"Shhhh."
youtubers like Fraser Cain is what makes this platform so amazing
try "nebula" it's full with creators like fraser. i'm sure you will like it. (not free tho)
Is this guy trying not to wake up the kids or something?
🤫
Dr. Troxel, if you ever get tired of being a scientist, you've got a future as an FM jazz radio DJ. 😎
Man! Dr MT got that S tier asmr voice going on at default setting! Makes it all the more easier to understand these concepts.
Or 100 times harder when you are not into asmr.
I’m listening to this as I work in the studio - thought there was a carbon monoxide leak - but turns out to be high levels of ASMR
😂😂😂 goodnight
I can't take this vocal fry
What? All this real deep information and you're fretting over his voice? Get real.
Dr. Troxel was a fascinating guest. His voice and way of speaking is very calm and relaxing. If the science thing doesn't work out, he'd be great at ASMR (no ear licking necessary).
really i found the opposite to be the case, you actively have to expend energy to even make out what he´s saying. pretty much the opposite of relaxing for me. kind of like listening to very low bitrate internet radio back in the day
@@symmetrie_bruchI found this too. I had to shut it off (even though interesting) It sounded to me like affected vocal fry. I can’t stand ASMR as well.
Wow! Frazer picks the best scientist to interciew, and asks informative questions. Thanks.
Great topic. Dr. Troxel is doing fascinating work.... but I can't take the vocal fry... ahhhhhhh!
To be clear, my problem, not Dr. Troxel's.
If movies today had trailers with voice over narration, Dr Troxel would have plenty of moonlighting work there as well!
you would hope for good subtitles then
Dr.Troxel is the kind of guy where you want to shut up and listen. He is not loud but it is profound and important for the amount of sound there is.
Nancy Grace has a Roman Telescope 😳?
- Cosmological Comedy. Ok, I'll go.
Nicely outré.😏
Interesting stuff. I wish we could listen to Dr. Troxel without the witness protection voice filter.
That's his voice.
1. Wait until they build a rubin telescope on darkside of moon. 🌙
2. I like creation matter instead of dark matter to describe (dark matter). 👀
Properly good
definitely proper and not slopper ole Chap.
wow that is fascinating
We do live in wonders times
What do you think about the NIDS program?
What a cool project!
Solid vid; a better thumbnail would be “None of These Galaxies are REAL?!”
Or more clickbaity: "FINALLY PROOF this Universe is a SIMULATION" 😂
I always thought that with JWST they actually did simulated observations on stuff they cant look at . As for supercomputer simulations I remember when they first used various machines to do this but couldnt get it to work because they didnt know about certain things .
Main Stream Scientists = *Math-A-Magicians !*
*Simulations = *Math-a-Magic !*
*FTMSSC !*
Bro needs to change the battery in his smoke detector.
These are not the galaxies you're looking for!
🤫shhhhhhh the dog is sleeping
Constant vocal fry is extremely exhausting, ngl… 😶
I got 30 seconds into that guy talking and could not take it.
@@stevehansen406 I gave up three and a half minutes in, sadly… 🥺 I simply couldn't focus on the message.
thank you, i thought i was the weird one with all these strange people praising his voice and how relaxing it is. it´s very much the opposite of relaxing to me. you have to actively expend energy to even make out what he´s saying. my first thought really was oh poor guy he seems quite young yet he obviously is just recovering from a stroke and is speaking over early 2000s very low bit rate internet radio.
Would quantum vacuum decay explain the big bang?
Dr. Troxel has a very good Rod Serling-like narration voice. Hopefully his universe simulation won’t develop its own malevolent entity like happened to the universe simulating scientist in an episode of the Twilight Zone. *AI says it was the Outer Limits episode called The Sandbox.
only he doesn´t sound like rod serling in the slightest
@@symmetrie_bruch You have to listen between the syllables.
"THAT MF GALAXY BACK THERE IS NOT REAL!!"
We going to sleep 💤 with this one 😂
wondering what your thoughts are on the skyhook idea for space travel infrastructure in the future?
Skyhook is the worst of megastructures. IMHO launch loop > space fountain > space elevator >> sky hook
@@Milan_Openfeint disagree, launch loop is nice but best only for orbital launch. You can get out of orbit but your speed wouldn't be so great. a trip to mars would still take months. a space fountain is multiple times the size and needs a lot more energy. to me it's just impracticable. space elevator needs building materials we do have yet. and it's not like we don't try to build high. but has anyone reached 1km yet? The skyhook idea has had some big changes since the first time it was proposed. are you sure you are up to date about it? or have you been discarding it ever since you 1st heard about it and thought it was stupid? skyhooks are meant to be the infrastructure to travel the solar system. not just sending stuff out from earth. I give launch loop a 👍 since it would be great to have it in combination with a skyhook. much better then the other 2.
@@laladieladada About space elevator, it's not a tower, it's a rope, so it doesn't matter if we have 1km or 2km tall towers.
About sky hook, if by recent development you mean that it ends at 10km altitude then I did not hear about that before but it still doesn't make any sense to me. How would you keep it spinning? How would you maintain its altitude in a way that is cheaper than lots of rockets? How do you deal with the oscillations caused by air drag? Does the rope even have enough inertia to accelerate cargo to orbital speed? My gut feeling says that this is harder than space elevator, your feeling may be different.
Somebody wake up Mike.
The topography of the universe over time and how it changes nothing but our perceptions of time and distance.
If dark matter changes states between a liquid and gaseous state then there would have been a time where almost all of the dark matter cooled, condensed and collapsed. This liquid state contraction could possibly have led to direct collapse black holes and galaxies. The condensing of dark matter may have also contributed to that uniformity of temperature.
If the dark matter was in its liquid state then baryonic and dark matter would have been much more concentrated. This would have resulted in deeper gravity wells. The time in these gravity wells to us would seem to be moving slower to us. But due to dark matter condensing the baryonic matter would also have been cooled and rushing together.
Once stars were formed and black holes became active the ratio of liquid to gaseous dark matter would have decreased over time thus affecting the evolution of particle masses. And making the gravity wells progressively shallower and larger in diameter over time. Galaxy clusters would have evaporated almost all of their liquid dark matter resulting in the shallowest part of the gravity well being near the canter of the cluster. Also part of redshift is due to the difference depth of the average gravity well at that point in time compared to now. The slope of that line would also have decreased over time. As vaporized dark matter spread further from the gravity wells the slope there would have increased (dark energy).
Light red shifts as it climbs out of a gravity well. Thus the further you go back in time the more light is redshifted. This would leave everything the same with the exception of our perception that the universe is expanding. Also if a big portion of the redshift is from climbing out of a deeper gravity well then we are not looking as far into the past as we think.
Phase transitioning dark matter could also answer several of the biggest questions in cosmology.
Spacetime is flat but has the equivalent of topography due to the cumulative effect of gravity on the passage of light through spacetime. It is probably more due to the time portion of spacetime than the actual speed of light. Light slows down in different materials I believe that the concentration of dark matter affects the speed of light.
In the Virgo cluster there is a 6 degree area that has over a hundred blueshifted galaxies most of which I believe are actually in a filament that climbs into the void behind where they appear to be. This could be the key to figuring out the distance to DM concentration ratio.
The early universe was much denser and the gravity wells much deeper. Light red shifts as it climbs out of a gravity well so part of our distance and time perception is due to light climbing out of the deeper gravity wells. The cosmic web was formed by condensing dark matter across spacetime. Once stars began fusion and black holes became active the dark matter began to evaporate. Resulting in progressively shallower gravity wells since then. Redshift minus the difference in gravity well depth equals actual distance.
This may be proven by over a hundred blue shifted galaxies that are located within a 6 degree area of the Virgo cluster. I believe these are in a filament rising out of the other side of the cluster into a void area. Because the filament is rising gravitationally toward a void the increasing blueshift makes these galaxies look like the are in the Virgo cluster.
This guy is a professor? He makes the most interesting topic sound so boring! Someone should get him on some effective presentation techniques course.
Just a couple white dudes for Harris chatting
I'm a Canadian, so I can't vote in US elections.
@@frasercain I'm British. All your lands and goods belong us.