13000 liters of burnt fuel per hour, hundreds of ships in the ocean daily, not to mention airplanes…. And they telling us we are the ones’s guilty of polluting the environment by driving our car to the store😆
Cars aren't the biggest source of carbon dioxide. Shipping isn't even close, either. If we *totally eliminate* personal cars for transportation, aircraft, and ships, we would cut less than 20% of carbon emissions. Energy production creates some 75% of carbon emissions. That is the low hanging fruit, not the boondoggle of EVs (which simply push the carbon emissions somewhere else). (And speaking of boondoggles, wind turbines (due to their temporary nature) produce more greenhouse gasses per kwh over their lifetimes than modern liquid natural gas steam plants.) Nor is solar energy generation the answer to the energy needs of civilization. It is not stable or energy dense enough. And if your answer to that is that we just need to reduce our electricity consumption, stop and think of what that will mean from a humanitarian standpoint. Reducing electricity production will just create a scarcity problem, which means that *only* the rich will be able to afford it. Making it state controlled doesn't help, either. The rich and powerful (in *every* system) always have control of scarce resources. If we wish to reduce carbon emissions, our target should be energy production, and if we wish to reduce carbon emissions from energy production, we need to move to nuclear fission plants. "But nuclear is dangerous," people say. Go look up Three Mile Island. The meltdown of that semi-modern (50 years old) reactor is the perfect example of how safe nuclear power is. No release of radiation. *Every* coal plant operating normally releases more radiation than Three Mile Island did when it melted down. "But nuclear fuel is limited," people say. Go look up the term "breeder reactor". This is a nuclear reactor which produces more fissile material than it consumes. "But that could be used for bombs!" Yes, and so can gasoline, and so are advanced metals and gunpowder and so on and so on. And it already *is* used for bombs. Just because it could be used for evil shouldn't keep you from using it for good. The currently-popular "green" narrative in most of The West is aimed at making middle- and upper-class people virtue signal by wasting resources on non-solution answers. [It is my *opinion* that this is due to the outsized influence of oil companies, but I cannot prove that claim.] If we want an actual solution, we need to move to nuclear.
I worked with ALCO 251 V-18 emergency diesel generators at a nuclear powerplant, with a max output ~3MWe. Their size is similar to a railroad locomotive powerplant.
Impressive technical construction! Just some curiosa: *Power-wise this engine could be replaced by ~120 formula-1 engines *In the first stage the Saturn 5 rocket consumed about the same amount of fuel per SECOND as this engine per hour.
None of the images that are used in this video show the actual engine that you are talking about, the biggest Wartsila 96 Flex is the 14 cylinder version, all of your images are of the smaller versions of the 96 Flex, you need to do better
The RT-Flex 96C Series engines (in 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 & 14 cyls.) are Wartsila "off the shelf" (more like.. "On the Books") products.... however, they don't build one, unless there's a certified buyer.
I don't know... but I can tell you that the Crankshaft in the 14 cyl. version weighs 300Tons (US), and that the whole engine weighs in at 2300Tons (4M 600K lbs).
michaelwirth.... he's also showing the 8 cylinder version, while giving the specifications for the 14 cylinder version... which are not entirely accurate, either. The 14 cyl. engine does Not develop "110,000"hp... it's currently at 107,898 hp with 5,162,935 lbs ft of torque.... at wide open throttle - 102 rpm!
"Heavy Fuel Oil" is probably Bunker C, which is so viscous that it has to be heated to make it flow, and is basically the residue from creating/distilling lighter oils.. The pollution that this engine emits must be staggering. Anything to save a buck.
These engines are elctronically controlled just like you car is. Emissions are minimal and probably a lot less per ton of cargo carried than your car is.
@@PeterGardner-e1z You couldn't make Bunker C non-polluting with all the electronics in the world. Even with no passengers, my car would produce less pollutants/ton of me than these monsters.
Wartsila... from Finland. Was originally Wartsila (4 cycle), then Wartsila-Sulzer, with Sulzer being from Switzerland and a producer of large "medium speed" (200 - 900 rpms) diesels, including Radial engines. Wartsila bought them out to expand their line with Marine 2 cycle technology. All the very biggest, high output diesels, are 2 cycle. The are only a very few marine diesel manufacturers in the world that have lathes large enough to handle the machine work on the crankshafts of these engines, especially the 14 cylinder version of the RT Series Wartsila. Their engines (the RT-Flex96 Series) are produced at the Ulsan / Hyundai Heavy Industries plant in South Korea... and they also have an Engine Dynamometer there, that can measure and handle the power output of the 14 cylinder version... the only one like it in the world. Wartsila's RT-60 Series (3,210 bhp per cyl.) are made in Wartsila's plant in Trieste, Italy.
Not an engine, but similar enough; year ago i did maintenance to gas compressors in oil refinery. Those were big enough for a slim guy like me to "worm-in". I´ll always get very well paid of those maintenances; surprisingly rare people voluntarily squuez themselves into tight spaces... many hard workers just say "don´t even ask... anything else but NOT that..." When you are "in", you move slooowly, maintaining calm mind. Same thing with every cramped spaces, like distilling columns. Avoiding snagging, which eventually happens, though... being calm you un-snag yourself easily, struggling would only makes it worse! I have a "thymb-rule", similar to how cats check if they fit through a hole; cats test with their whiskers if they fit in without any problem. If my hardhat withear protection cups fit, so will whole my body! No one ever mocks guys who don´t want to go down there, no one is forced to do that. It IS an eery feeling to have tons of steel around you, and you can barely move, not to mention that you have a "job to do"! Though every safety-measures done, some people designated just to overwatch everything, you still know that even if you just get stuck really bad, or get health issues... no one can help you!... It would take days to disassemble machinery or what ever from around you to give any help... Those cave-explorers and divers surely know what i mean!
The formula for calculating the engine displacement or CC (cubic capacity) is: CC = (π/4) x bore² x stroke x number of cylinders Where π (pi) is a mathematical constant approximately equal to 3.14. Given: Bore = 960 mm Stroke = 2500 mm Number of cylinders = 14 Using the formula above: CC = (π/4) x 960² x 2500 x 14 CC = (3.14/4) x 921,600 x 2500 x 14 CC = 2.3562 x 10^12 cubic mm CC = 2,356,200 liters (rounded to the nearest hundredth) Therefore, the engine displacement or CC of the given engine is 2,356,200 liters.
The engine 14RT-flex96C develops around 107 000hp not 150 000hp. I so the engine in 2009 on the assembly line in engine plant #1 in HHI, Ulsan city, ROK. Only one image in the film shows the 14RT-flex96C engine.
@@vasilemocanu6105 i thought i heard some one one a t.v. program say the largest 14 cyl ship engine turned out 150.000 hp . guess you can't believe every thing you hear on t.v.. still not to bad at 107.000 hp . would not want the fuel bill , it would be a lot of money .
Well I saved my pennies and I saved my dimes giddy up giddy up 049 before I knew there would be a time giddy up 049 when I would buy a brand new 049-049 giddy up giddy up 049 My single barrel, single speed prop driven 049 049-049 giddy up 049
The Engine shown in the video, Does Not produce 110,000 hp... and Neither does the Largest one. The engine shown in the video is Wartsila's 8 cyl. version of the RT-96C. There are also 6, 7, 10, 12 & 14 inline cylinder versions as well. The inline 14 cylinder version is the one that produces 109,000 hp+/- and approximately 5.4 Million lbs ft of torque. The crankshaft alone, weighs 300 Tons (US) and 2300 tons, (2M, 300K lbs) total.
"In any system of energy, Control is what consumes energy the most. Time taken in stocking energy to build an energy system, adding to it the time taken in building the system will always be longer than the entire useful lifetime of the system. No energy store holds enough energy to extract an amount of energy equal to the total energy it stores. No system of energy can deliver sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it. This universal truth applies to all systems. Energy, like time, flows from past to future".
Pretty sure the most powerful ship engine in the World is the real restricted power of one of those American Super carriers. Unfortunately they will not say what it is really capable of doing and yes, after they have powered Tokyo after the Tsunami and parts of the Philippines after natural disasters with power left over to run the ship. In an emergency those big carriers are actually fast and agile!
Mind the environment !! Back to using wooden boat pedal and create some jobs for people rowing the ship and singing: Row, row, row your boat Gently down the stream Merrily merrily, merrily, merrily Life is but a dream
thank you, prevent effect of global warming, minerals and temperature of water and air from sea are huge source of energy, reduce more than 50% using fossil fuel, fresh water, fertilizer(minerals+o2,n2,C), zero pollution, economy will rise by using jet plasma machine and compressed gas(Air) in isolated structure in water pool with more than 80 % efficiency, it has two vertical cylinders, in first level it transfers compressed gas(hot air) temperature from engine to sea water in pool for steam electric generator, steam combines with high cold Air pressure to produce pure water and electricity , New energy from sea will change world soon, there are other source of energy that with international cooperation in coastline we can reduce effect of global warming, further more we can prevent these phenomena like cyclone and flood and wildfire by using this hot seasonal atmospheric condition, recent years in summer, geothermal energy happens in surface of coastline, there are many countries in coastline with seasonal hot weather and water condition in comparison with middle Ocean, its more than 12 degrees ,this differences must decrease, in sum-up, by using this energy not only is economical but also reduce global warming in countries like Japan, China, India, Mediterranean countries, Iran, Brazil, Mexico, Us, Canada, (Africa and Arabian countries....) . I invented new method base on air pressure rules and quantum physics ionization sea water minerals in strong dynamic permanent magnet(SMCO) with special frequency(1500or 3000)/minute bases on paramagnetic and diamagnetic particles and electrical microwave electron wave field and electric chemical reactions and photon wave from semiconductors with special angle Cations like(K+, Mg++, Na+, H+, H++, li+, H2, ...) are transferred to in the second level into up level by vacuum pump from storage into combustion chambers and they combine with O2 and N2 ,... as major part of fuel they increase speed of machine, modern induct Giri box to control opposite direction, for producing electricity and fresh water (removed minerals by accelerate ionization sys from sea water) and fertilizer. this machine produces 150Megwatt/hour and 20000M3/DAY fresh water and fertilizer. 7 methods zero pollution for reducing global warming I mentioned in my profile. (G20 countries can solve these phenomena).
It's crazy to think what humans are capable of achieving. The both brain and body has no limits it seems haha. Awesome video btw
Thank you for the comment
@@marineinsight no problem
We can even destroy our surrounding environment and do nothing about it. Amazing really.
Not anymore😂
@@firebladeboost4766 true. Degeneracy is taking over 😂
a small town of 660.000 people, That gave me a chuckle
No offense, but maybe in India that’s the population of a small town.
"The torque is enough to tear a tank to shreds." How exactly did they figure that out???
Lol
Who cares, it sounded cool.
Maths
Yeah no shit
Think of it as Newton a hydraulic press delivers
Average person weighing 70kg? Not in America 😂
😅 let’s not go into geography
I guess they live in some "small towns with 660 000" people))
In America they weigh more...
America isn't the fattest country anymore. Not even close. Most of the world has caught up (the more developed the fatter) ... Mostly
American average person prob 220 pounds
13000 liters of burnt fuel per hour, hundreds of ships in the ocean daily, not to mention airplanes…. And they telling us we are the ones’s guilty of polluting the environment by driving our car to the store😆
big mistake believing in the climate h0ax, global warming has been around since the Dinosaurs.
Cars aren't the biggest source of carbon dioxide. Shipping isn't even close, either. If we *totally eliminate* personal cars for transportation, aircraft, and ships, we would cut less than 20% of carbon emissions.
Energy production creates some 75% of carbon emissions. That is the low hanging fruit, not the boondoggle of EVs (which simply push the carbon emissions somewhere else). (And speaking of boondoggles, wind turbines (due to their temporary nature) produce more greenhouse gasses per kwh over their lifetimes than modern liquid natural gas steam plants.)
Nor is solar energy generation the answer to the energy needs of civilization. It is not stable or energy dense enough. And if your answer to that is that we just need to reduce our electricity consumption, stop and think of what that will mean from a humanitarian standpoint. Reducing electricity production will just create a scarcity problem, which means that *only* the rich will be able to afford it. Making it state controlled doesn't help, either. The rich and powerful (in *every* system) always have control of scarce resources.
If we wish to reduce carbon emissions, our target should be energy production, and if we wish to reduce carbon emissions from energy production, we need to move to nuclear fission plants. "But nuclear is dangerous," people say. Go look up Three Mile Island. The meltdown of that semi-modern (50 years old) reactor is the perfect example of how safe nuclear power is. No release of radiation. *Every* coal plant operating normally releases more radiation than Three Mile Island did when it melted down. "But nuclear fuel is limited," people say. Go look up the term "breeder reactor". This is a nuclear reactor which produces more fissile material than it consumes. "But that could be used for bombs!" Yes, and so can gasoline, and so are advanced metals and gunpowder and so on and so on. And it already *is* used for bombs. Just because it could be used for evil shouldn't keep you from using it for good.
The currently-popular "green" narrative in most of The West is aimed at making middle- and upper-class people virtue signal by wasting resources on non-solution answers. [It is my *opinion* that this is due to the outsized influence of oil companies, but I cannot prove that claim.] If we want an actual solution, we need to move to nuclear.
@@iluomopeloso *PREACH*
They lie to us
I just worked on a gigantic 4 cylinder 1.4 Liter VW Lupo Engine with mindblowing 60 hp
I worked with C15/C16 Caterpillar engine producing components for the power train. Wonderful experience. Later with BMW, VW, Daimler engines.
I worked with ALCO 251 V-18 emergency diesel generators at a nuclear powerplant, with a max output ~3MWe. Their size is similar to a railroad locomotive powerplant.
thank you for sharing
The 18-251 engine.... Was a Locomotive prime mover..... but, Unfortunately for ALCO... it came too late to save the company.
Does it use Champion spark plugs?
There is no spark plug in it 😜
A 4 cyln. Doxford 2 stroke opposed piston engine 115 rpm.6640 bhp,23 ton HFO daily.
doxford seahorse..nice .reliable. and smooth ..but unfotunaly complicated in maitenance.and outdated since 1975.
Worked on Sulzer RLA 90, onboard a VLCC
Max output: 35000 BHP
Ship's DWT= 3005000
Used to repair Sulzer rd90 injectors could hardly lift them
That is pretty amazing
👍🏻
I have worked mostly with the minarelli am6 motor but I once started and stopped a caterpillar 4000hp engine in a fishing vessle.
I worked in the Merchant navy, we had a 7cylinder Sulzer basically the same only smaller, pistons weighed 5 ton each.
The biggest engine I have worked with is a Ford 5.4L 'lol'
super old Tech made giant. Pretty cool still and powerful.
Impressive technical construction!
Just some curiosa:
*Power-wise this engine could be replaced by ~120 formula-1 engines
*In the first stage the Saturn 5 rocket consumed about the same amount of fuel per SECOND as this engine per hour.
Video on how can i fit it in my honda??
None of the images that are used in this video show the actual engine that you are talking about, the biggest Wartsila 96 Flex is the 14 cylinder version, all of your images are of the smaller versions of the 96 Flex, you need to do better
Yes, this is for representation purpose only as we do not want to breach copyrights.
The ship I am on right now has the 10RT Flex 96C....great video😎⚓️🌊🚢
I'd worked on a 3.5L V6 Isuzu engine on a Holden Rodeo 2005 model 4x4 which is the largest engine I'd worked on.
I can’t imagine the labor it would take to remove the crankshaft for an overhaul.
can i fit it in my corolla? Just thinking of buying one btw
🙃😂
100 Corolla can fit in this behemoth engine 😅.
my god the stats on that engine are mind blowing
Small town of 660,000 ppl 😲
Yup🙏
Dont let VW get a hands on this or it will have oil consumption issues 😂
Would we consider this off shelve product of Wartsila or customised engine ?
The RT-Flex 96C Series engines (in 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 & 14 cyls.) are Wartsila "off the shelf" (more like.. "On the Books") products.... however, they don't build one, unless there's a certified buyer.
Wonder how much that flywheel weighs
It's massive
I don't know... but I can tell you that the Crankshaft in the 14 cyl. version weighs 300Tons (US), and that the whole engine weighs in at 2300Tons (4M 600K lbs).
Wow amazing technology
This giant 2 stroke is available in Arctic Cats 858 Catalyst and Riot sleds!
I managed 2 7-cylinder 2-stroke diesels in my friends ship. I ran them at 270 rpm most of the time. They were made by NOHAB, Nydkvist & Holm AB...
😊
NOHAB is owned by Wärsilä (Finland)
660,000 people is a small town in China or India.
You lets know
Imagine replacing this behemoth engine with a volvo engine on Maersk ship
The problem with this video is the lack of structure. Many things you say twice (the height, the comparison with a truck engine and more).
Thank you for the feedback
michaelwirth.... he's also showing the 8 cylinder version, while giving the specifications for the 14 cylinder version... which are not entirely accurate, either. The 14 cyl. engine does Not develop "110,000"hp... it's currently at 107,898 hp with 5,162,935 lbs ft of torque.... at wide open throttle - 102 rpm!
swap that engine to a civic
Imagine in the future, this engine will be able to fit in the palm of your hand.
Tapping ZPE aetheric energy probably, not weak combustionn lol
Negative, ghost rider
Itll fit in a miata
"Heavy Fuel Oil" is probably Bunker C, which is so viscous that it has to be heated to make it flow, and is basically the residue from creating/distilling lighter oils.. The pollution that this engine emits must be staggering. Anything to save a buck.
Better to use the heavy fuel oil than not, right? What else would it be used for?
@@joshuaborem7063 Road surfacing, as tar-macadam.
@@nigelrg1 nice.
But also makes good fuel :)
These engines are elctronically controlled just like you car is. Emissions are minimal and probably a lot less per ton of cargo carried than your car is.
@@PeterGardner-e1z You couldn't make Bunker C non-polluting with all the electronics in the world. Even with no passengers, my car would produce less pollutants/ton of me than these monsters.
Is this Wärtsilä Sulzer engine?
Wärtsilä yes. Wärtsilä bought the Sulzer.
Fiat engine on Burmpak Bahamas ! Almost as big as this! About 35 years ago
Woaah
First engine of this type was built and delivered in 2006 from Wärsilä
Which company made it and which country?
Wartsila... from Finland. Was originally Wartsila (4 cycle), then Wartsila-Sulzer, with Sulzer being from Switzerland and a producer of large "medium speed" (200 - 900 rpms) diesels, including Radial engines. Wartsila bought them out to expand their line with Marine 2 cycle technology.
All the very biggest, high output diesels, are 2 cycle. The are only a very few marine diesel manufacturers in the world that have lathes large enough to handle the machine work on the crankshafts of these engines, especially the 14 cylinder version of the RT Series Wartsila.
Their engines (the RT-Flex96 Series) are produced at the Ulsan / Hyundai Heavy Industries plant in South Korea... and they also have an Engine Dynamometer there, that can measure and handle the power output of the 14 cylinder version... the only one like it in the world. Wartsila's RT-60 Series (3,210 bhp per cyl.) are made in Wartsila's plant in Trieste, Italy.
Not an engine, but similar enough; year ago i did maintenance to gas compressors in oil refinery. Those were big enough for a slim guy like me to "worm-in". I´ll always get very well paid of those maintenances; surprisingly rare people voluntarily squuez themselves into tight spaces... many hard workers just say
"don´t even ask... anything else but NOT that..."
When you are "in", you move slooowly, maintaining calm mind. Same thing with every cramped spaces, like distilling columns. Avoiding snagging, which eventually happens, though... being calm you un-snag yourself easily, struggling would only makes it worse!
I have a "thymb-rule", similar to how cats check if they fit through a hole; cats test with their whiskers if they fit in without any problem.
If my hardhat withear protection cups fit, so will whole my body!
No one ever mocks guys who don´t want to go down there, no one is forced to do that. It IS an eery feeling to have tons of steel around you, and you can barely move, not to mention that you have a "job to do"!
Though every safety-measures done, some people designated just to overwatch everything, you still know that even if you just get stuck really bad, or get health issues... no one can help you!...
It would take days to disassemble machinery or what ever from around you to give any help...
Those cave-explorers and divers surely know what i mean!
Hey…. I have an idea….. let’s put this in a boat and if it doesn’t sink….. we are in the money
Can we put it in a miata?
12K98ME-C
Big one..which ship?
@@marineinsight CMA CGM ANDROMEDA
Awesome 😍
CMA CGM jaques junior have one MAN 11S106ME huge engine
Yep CMA CGM NORMA and RIGOLETTO
10 cyl 1060 mm GMT
Awesome
SULZER RND 90. Ten cylinder in line, 900mm diam. cylinder. Dual fuel.
Swap it into a supra
🤣
How much cc
The formula for calculating the engine displacement or CC (cubic capacity) is:
CC = (π/4) x bore² x stroke x number of cylinders
Where π (pi) is a mathematical constant approximately equal to 3.14.
Given:
Bore = 960 mm
Stroke = 2500 mm
Number of cylinders = 14
Using the formula above:
CC = (π/4) x 960² x 2500 x 14
CC = (3.14/4) x 921,600 x 2500 x 14
CC = 2.3562 x 10^12 cubic mm
CC = 2,356,200 liters (rounded to the nearest hundredth)
Therefore, the engine displacement or CC of the given engine is 2,356,200 liters.
@@marineinsight
Man,
it's 2.3 million cc
Can you please tell me how tall it is?? You haven't mentioned this.
45 feet
does it fit in a miata
💪try it out
Nuclear propulsion may be 3 times large than it.
Nop, those are usually turbine engines
I want to see the battery that powers that ship. You know we can't use this type of engine anymore.
🤣🤣🤣🤣Yeah right...!
This engine looks green to me.
it is not the biggest engine , there is a 14 cyl engine that is twice the size and power of the engine you are talking about . it has 150.000 hp .
The engine 14RT-flex96C develops around 107 000hp not 150 000hp. I so the engine in 2009 on the assembly line in engine plant #1 in HHI, Ulsan city, ROK. Only one image in the film shows the 14RT-flex96C engine.
@@vasilemocanu6105 i thought i heard some one one a t.v. program say the largest 14 cyl ship engine turned out 150.000 hp . guess you can't believe every thing you hear on t.v.. still not to bad at 107.000 hp . would not want the fuel bill , it would be a lot of money .
Then name it and call Guinness liars.
Would be nice / more professional to use standard terms acc. SI-Norms like kW for Power, wight in metric tons and dimensions in metres as well.
the smallest i worked on was 0.9cc...lol
😅 too small
Well I saved my pennies and I saved my dimes giddy up giddy up 049 before I knew there would be a time giddy up 049 when I would buy a brand new 049-049 giddy up giddy up 049
My single barrel, single speed prop driven 049 049-049 giddy up 049
Largest engine our crew rebuilt wss a Clark HBA inline 10
Literally taller than a 2 story house
The Engine shown in the video, Does Not produce 110,000 hp... and Neither does the Largest one. The engine shown in the video is Wartsila's 8 cyl. version of the RT-96C. There are also 6, 7, 10, 12 & 14 inline cylinder versions as well. The inline 14 cylinder version is the one that produces 109,000 hp+/- and approximately 5.4 Million lbs ft of torque. The crankshaft alone, weighs 300 Tons (US) and 2300 tons, (2M, 300K lbs) total.
Scania has 2400 HP and this has 110000 HP, so 46 scania engines have more power. But I guess the torque is the most important factor here.
Honda Civic drivers be like:
You say its 4 story high then you say its 3 story high and how does an engine teer a tank to shreds?
Hp is irrelevant. Whats the tq?
More bigger someday,, for the population growth 😍👌👍
i don’t think it will get more bigger.i think they will use multiple comparatively small engines on bigger ships.
You know he's from India by the way he called 600,000 people a small town
14RTFlex96C
👍
Would you like a Squishie with your HOT DOG?!
But there are cargo ships 🚢 that carry’s more than double the capacity, than the Emma Maersk , isn’t there any engine that are bigger
this is a record holder as of now.
probably just use 2
Talk about Master Builders.....
"In any system of energy, Control is what consumes energy the most.
Time taken in stocking energy to build an energy system, adding to it the time taken in building the system will always be longer than the entire useful lifetime of the system.
No energy store holds enough energy to extract an amount of energy equal to the total energy it stores.
No system of energy can deliver sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it.
This universal truth applies to all systems.
Energy, like time, flows from past to future".
absolutely astounding‼️
Can it fit in a Supra?
over 100 supra can fit on this behemoth engine 😅.
12 cylinder EMD on an oil exploration vessel.
Which Series EMD ?
No one in the USA weighs 70kg, more like 170kg. Babies are commonly 80-90kg. True Story.
Why are non Americans so obsessed with Americans?
1 litter per minute. run out of fuel
🤯
Can it fit my Go-kart
This is much old news..why is this uploading now??
People outside the industry still do not know about it
I want the tandoori chicken .....
Sure we can do a potluck
X92DF from WinGD
Awesome
Motor enorme, diesel 2 tempos.
4.0 Cherokee engine
👍
Pretty sure the most powerful ship engine in the World is the real restricted power of one of those American Super carriers. Unfortunately they will not say what it is really capable of doing and yes, after they have powered Tokyo after the Tsunami and parts of the Philippines after natural disasters with power left over to run the ship. In an emergency those big carriers are actually fast and agile!
Shit boys we blew a piston ring 😮
unreal
Mind the environment !! Back to using wooden boat pedal and create some jobs for people rowing the ship and singing:
Row, row, row your boat
Gently down the stream
Merrily merrily, merrily, merrily
Life is but a dream
২৩০০ টন ইনজিন বিশাল বড় ট্রাকের দরকার, বহনের জন্য।
eisob boro boro engine besh koekta part e venge besh koekta truck e poribohon kora hoy.pore ship e niye engine eksathe jora lagano hoy.
what the f is feet high?
Flying engines *8 startup
2023 /Red
It yearns for a miata.
30 mil is so cheap for that honestly
Worked with 100cc bike engine😅😅
Sir engine is my engine is down life engine i m peter paul sanga
OK then.
3,28 feet = 1 m
NAPA I need a valve gasket for a ......
**FINISH YOUR SENTENCE, CLOWN!!**
My bike all so have BIGEST engine😏
😱
12RTA84C
Big Engine
8 horsepower 😢
I have worked with an engine from a toy car before 🥴
Naturally, we have bigger ones in Yorkshire!😉
thank you, prevent effect of global warming, minerals and temperature of water and air from sea are huge source of energy, reduce more than 50% using fossil fuel, fresh water, fertilizer(minerals+o2,n2,C), zero pollution, economy will rise by using jet plasma machine and compressed gas(Air) in isolated structure in water pool with more than 80 % efficiency, it has two vertical cylinders, in first level it transfers compressed gas(hot air) temperature from engine to sea water in pool for steam electric generator, steam combines with high cold Air pressure to produce pure water and electricity , New energy from sea will change world soon, there are other source of energy that with international cooperation in coastline we can reduce effect of global warming, further more we can prevent these phenomena like cyclone and flood and wildfire by using this hot seasonal atmospheric condition, recent years in summer, geothermal energy happens in surface of coastline, there are many countries in coastline with seasonal hot weather and water condition in comparison with middle Ocean, its more than 12 degrees ,this differences must decrease, in sum-up, by using this energy not only is economical but also reduce global warming in countries like Japan, China, India, Mediterranean countries, Iran, Brazil, Mexico, Us, Canada, (Africa and Arabian countries....) . I invented new method base on air pressure rules and quantum physics ionization sea water minerals in strong dynamic permanent magnet(SMCO) with special frequency(1500or 3000)/minute bases on paramagnetic and diamagnetic particles and electrical microwave electron wave field and electric chemical reactions and photon wave from semiconductors with special angle Cations like(K+, Mg++, Na+, H+, H++, li+, H2, ...) are transferred to in the second level into up level by vacuum pump from storage into combustion chambers and they combine with O2 and N2 ,... as major part of fuel they increase speed of machine, modern induct Giri box to control opposite direction, for producing electricity and fresh water (removed minerals by accelerate ionization sys from sea water) and fertilizer. this machine produces 150Megwatt/hour and 20000M3/DAY fresh water and fertilizer. 7 methods zero pollution for reducing global warming I mentioned in my profile. (G20 countries can solve these phenomena).
😮❤