Thanks again for the videos Bob. As someone who drastically overthinks most purchases, you have steered me in the right direction twice now. The Enforcer 104 Unlimited and Duke PT is a great combo for wind hold days, holidays when I want to get away from the crowd, or my annual climb up the notch road.. Yeah, it's heavy. But if I want to shave weight from my touring set up the best place to start is on the treadmill. Can't wait for some snow now!
Great video, as always, Bob. I always value your opinion and insights, me being 48 with 4 kids that I ski with, and being 6'3 and 250 pounds. Thanks for sharing your collection with us.
I always find these quiver breakdowns super interesting, especially since I live and work at a resort (Deer Valley / Park City) and have a growing quiver of my own. What I’ve noticed from watching your other videos is that there are skis you say you love (like the Justis) and skis you actually buy (like the Declivity X 102). It’s such a great example of "know thyself." It’s cool to see how you’ve put your quiver together and hear which skis end up in the truck most often. I feel like I’m still chasing my "Goldilocks" ski-the one I instinctively grab for most days. During our epic 600" winter, it was the Salomon Blank, but last year I leaned on the K2 Mindbender 89Ti. This season, I think it might be my new Blizzard Anomaly 88. Still, I’m hunting for that perfect 99-102mm daily driver that can carve while staying playful across the mountain. The Mantra 102 has been solid but can feel tiring after a few hours. That Declivity is definitely on my radar, though the Justis sounds pretty tempting too!
The best piece of ski equipment for me in the last few years is a Zipfit liner. I wanted the best performance i could get and got a pair with the leather lining. They hold your feet like concrete, but warm and comfy. They blew me away from the first turn. They made my meager quiver more responsive, like getting new skis. I ski a 140 Rossi WC boot and they stiffened up with the Zip so took out the top heel screw and they are perfect. I ski a Rossi CX80 @ 180cm/20m and a Rossi Experience 100 @ 182cm/24m if it dumps. Your quiver would drive me nukkin futz! too many and too nuanced. I know I need to broaden my horizon to some newer stuff but my take is "it's a poor workman who blames his tools". Keeping it simple works for me. I live in JH Wy and ski a lot. I like your reviews keep it up.
Definitely looking forward to the Zip and combining the comfy forefoot with the solid heel. In reality, I'll use about three of these skis this winter, so most of it is fluff.
@@SkiEssentials neoprene wool interior combo is amazing. The fullness of the cuff leads to excellent transfer. You'll be extremely happy. I also don't get the liner first method, I still just stuff them in and step in.
I actually find it easier to ‘world cup’ step in with liner on.. get used to it pretty quickly.. the cork heel lock is so distinct, it too hard to step into while in the boot!
Hi Bob, you guys should have called these episodes : " What's in the Ski Room " 😂😂😂😂 , my mates call me crazy for buying new boots almost every season and having 4 pairs of skis, but you and Jeff are on another level !!! last February I bought the Fischer RC4 Pro MV Boa 27.5 , the best boot I ever owned and I had many in 54 years of skiing, it comes standard with the Zipfit Liner, had the shell on the inside ankles slightly punched out, got my feet taped up with the cushion pads used for a foam liner, they heated up the liner , I put them on, slid into the shells and 10 minutes later all done, it's the best fitting liner and boot combo ever, comfortable, warm, but still a high performance boot with 140 flex, I was a bit worried about getting into the shell with the liner already on the foot because of the Boa system, but I shouldn't have been, the boa shell opens nicely and absolutely not a problem , my advise in putting on the boot with Zipfit liner is definitely this: lace up the liner nice and snug and then slide into the shell, after a few times it's as easy as, the reason this is recommended by Zipfit, is to NOT push the cork material into the wrong spots when you step in with the liner inside the shell as the cork mixture never hardens totally, that's what makes the Zipfit Liners sooo great, they constantly can adjust to changes to your foot which other liners can't , be it standard foam , Foamed or Intuition. I had them all, but nothing comes close to this Liner !!! Enjoy the Zipfit it's awesome.
Thank you so much for this information, we're still learning about the Zips, and having empirical advice like this is great. I still want to avoid the lacing and racer entry process, but if it comes to that, then I'll do it.
Thanks not a quiver, that's an armoury! Thanks for sharing, Bob! Just like Jeff's video, I really enjoyed hearing you two talk us through all your equipment - but, unlike Jeff, I'm very happy to see that you're also a believer of the strapless ski pole lifestyle!
Looks like you both have the Head e-rally. One of my favs. I also have Blizzard FIS Slalom, Dynastar FIS GS, Fischer RC4 CT, Rossignol Hero Elite +TI, Nordica Enforcer 100, Salomon Qst Blank and Armada JJ I picked up for $50 bucks at a swap for rock powder ski. Love them all!
Bob is a man after my own heart. I don't have that many but I love me some Atomic and Nordica. You just can't go wrong with either. Only thing lacking is maybe one set of K2 or Volkl skis sprinkled in there. Bob can shred for a taller guy! You guys should upload more raw riding/testing content! We enjoy watching it! Cheers to this season! ⛷️
Every time I get on a Mantra 88 I want one. I also LOVE the new Blaze 104. If I were to do a Volkl quiver of two, it'd be those. As for K2, I like the 106C, but there's a lot of competition in that range.
I wonder how an Blizzard Anomaly 84 or a Armada declivity 82 would compare to your AR and fit in your quiver (maybe replace the enforcer 88????). I wonder what you use when you just have a bump day? I was expecting you to have a narrower ski that you use in bumps. I find myself skiing a lot of groomers and bumps on days that don't have fresh snow and have really been looking at one of those two narrow all mountain skis.
I'd personally rather be on a lighter and more flexible wider ski like the Bent 90 than a narrower and stiffer ski like the Declivity, although I think that and the Anomaly work great for bumps. I'll give up some width for flex, I suppose. I also don't think I want narrower for that Enforcer type of ski, if I'm replacing the 88, I'm going with that width or wider up to 92/93. If I were skiing groomers and bumps, I'd take the Anomaly. Of my skis, probably the Montero and give up a bit of bump performance.
Most people believe their feet are bigger than they really are and their ski boots are too big. For example I just saw some Salomon shifts for sale where the guy claims to be a size 10 foot but the ski boot is a 29.5 which is not a 10 lol. When I sold ski boots people would tell me their shoe size when I didn’t ask,. Then once measured it would always be smaller than they claimed. I even realized this about myself. (Wore 9.5us shoes, but measured at a 8.5us on a scanning tool, and dropped my ski boot down from 27.5 to 26.5 and could actually fit a 25.5 if I wanted to do some shell work.
I wear an 11 street shoe normally and a 27.5 mondo size shell, which roughly equates to a US 9, so yes, I size down in boots. I've skied in 26.5's before and just find that I can get almost as good performance in the 27.5's with a lot more comfort and warmth, so I've moved that route over the past three years.
Please Bob, try a shorter set of poles! I would say that you could easily use 5cm shorter! Short poles help staying in a low aggressive position, long poles force to much extension at the wrong time into the turn! ....please give short poles a try! I'm 175cm and I ski 120cm poles down to 110cm, 120cm in the woods/powder and 110cm for high speed carving/groomers. Even 105cm is sill very fun to me for high speed carves but it starts to be annoyingly short in the chairlift queue.
The 135's that I use are only for local race days, even though by the book, that's pretty close to the proper length for me. The 125's that I use everyday are pretty short already. In the video I note that since I don't use straps, I can easily grip the pole two finger notches lower to bring it down to about a 120 for bumps. I used to use 120's because I skied moguls and telemark, but moving back to more alpine skiing, I bumped back up to 125. Also, I really enjoy skiing with no poles.
Salomon Strive 16 would be a great pairing. 14 would work well too. I think those bindings feel great on more carving oriented skis like the AR, but they still retain all-mountain versatility too.
@ thanks for the response! I saw they have some type of demo binding called a strive 13D, but I didn’t know if there was a pro/con to that one. I will look at the 14 and 16
Hey Bob, thanks for sharing. Love my enforcer 88s and also looking to upgrade and can't decide was looking at anomaly 88 or enforcer 89 what are your thoughts?
I found the new Enforcer to be an amazing carver with rock-solid performance--more now than ever before. The Anomaly kind of went the other way (not by a lot) in adding some versatility to the Brahma 88. It's fair to say the Anomaly (viewed as new Brahma) and Enforcer have swapped spots. Now, I LOVE the versatility of the Anomaly, and haven't found it to lack when it comes to carving capabilities, especially since I can't touch the ceiling of any of these skis. I was surprised to find that the Anomaly felt like a more natural ski to me as I've always loved the Enforcer shape and style at all widths.
Thank you for sharing Bob. Totally agree with the comment about how important a good boot fitting is. Wish I had low volume or even mid volume feet….more options available. Love the ole throw back skis (had some Elan Comprex S RC in a 20something and wish I still had them for the wall). As a mature skier I will say backcountry is good for ya. Keeps you in shape and you learn to slow down and see so many more sights you never see when at the resort. Great stuff. I’m always up for trying new stuff so I say add some black crows to the mix. Have a great year on the slopes.
It's not currently on the books, but we are getting more and more information about 2026 product, boots included, so if a K2 Flex strikes our eyes, I'm sure we'll put some time in!
What would be your dedicated powder ski if you were say stationed at Alta or Japan for a whole season? Cheers. I sat this because I'm about your size and that's where I go. Cheers.
For powder only, like I can have more skis? If that's the case I am taking a strong look at a Head Kore 117 and the Salomon QST X at 116. I like lighter somewhat stiffer powder skis rather than heavier twins like a Revolt 121 or a Rossignol Blackops, although those'd be great from time to time. For the whole season, I'm going lighter.
Great review, Bob. Loved the Zipfit screen comments! Your skis vary in length much more than did Jeff's. Do you have small feet for your height? I also wear 27.5 boots , but I'm only 5'11”. And I have the same issue with width. I wear Scarpa TX Pro tele boots and their 102 last is narrow for me. Super Force 203cm...old school! When I was a kid, we wouldn't be caught dead on anything shorter than 200s - "long skis truck, short skis suck." Except for the binding mounting position, I'd believe they were from my high school era. Our skis back then looked like only 1/3 of the ski was behind you. And you really had to keep your nose over your tips to turn them. Radii were measured on miles, not meters. And it’s good to see that Look Pivots still exist (I ski tele, so I don’t pay attention to Alpine bindngs). I had them (or a version of them) back in the 80s. I have the 2021 Bentchetler (as they were called back then) 100s and love them. Mine have fully capped sidewalls, so did Atomic change the sidewall for 2022? Good all-around ski with middling width, smeary and surfy, enough tail rocker to feel comfortable skiing switch, and light enough for climbing (though the tail splay isn’t ideal for skinning up.). And love the graphics!
Yes I have small feet for my height (and weight) and it gives me problems. Wide forefoot, high insteps. I had the Scarpa T1 for years and they fit great in the 27.5. The Pivot is a timeless piece for sure!
Have been looking to upgrade this season. On the east coast, and want something for all mountain activities. Have been going between the mantra 88, qst 92, stormrider 88, bent 90. What do you think overall just gives the best skiing experience for east coast all mountain? Any suggestions other than what I have been looking at?
If you're truly looking for overall east coast performance, I think it's tough to look past the QST 92--that ski is so well-rounded and versatile. That said, if you want to emphasize carving performance, lean to the Mantra or Stormrider. If you want more playfulness and flex, then Bent. The QST, though, is a wonderful blend of all of them.
hi, can i ask for ski recomendation Im beetwen 2 bind adn 2 skies, dynafit rotation 12 vs salomon shift 13 and salomon qst 98 and elan ripstick 96. I want to make 1 ski quiver for skituring mostly focused on downhill that i can take for few days on rest too
Bob, you could replace the Enforcer 88 with the Kastle MX88! I just skied with a buddy who swears by the Zipfits and I might have to take that plunge as well. Thx
I think I'd go wider and more versatile. I think there's be too much overlap with MX and AR. Black Crows Serpo or Captis, Salomon Stance 90, maybe a bit more playful to Line Optic 88?
Thanks for sharing your quiver and all the great reviews. My daily driver is a Bonafide but looking for a less demanding mid 80 ski for carving but also versatile enough to pop in and out of the bumps/trees. Would you choose Montero AR, Anomaly 88 or even a SR 88? Mostly softer snow conditions out West. Thanks for your input.
I think you're looking at the Anomaly here, especially if you're used to the Bonafide. The Anomaly 88 takes a bit of the edge off with more rocker, taper, and a slightly more flexible build. I fear the Stormrider is on the light side while the Montero is on the carvy side.
Thanks for the reply. Will hopefully demo Anomaly shortly. I am 173cm tall and 180lbs so wondering what length? I fall between sizes so wonder if I should go up to 176 or the 170. Thanks again for all the great reviews and advice.
Zipfit workhorse. Interesting. Neoprene only stays warm if it's wet and next to the skin, which macerates the skin (I've tried skiing in neoprene socks in the past - mistakes were made). I have Boot Doctor custom liners in my RS 130, but still had to cut out the big toe and make a tuck tape (house sheathing vapour barrier tape) custom toe so my foot can operate properly. All liners have weird pointy toes. Edit: omg, the sticky heel inner leather in the Zipfit Workhorse sounds like a dream. Feeling the heel loosen and boot drop when pulling the ski up is terrifying. Will see if I can find some in my area.
The forefoot material may not be pure neoprene--apologies if I am mistaken, we're still new to the Zipfit game. Also, the forefoot material is lined with what seems to be some type of wool, so there's definitely no neoprene to skin direct contact.
Hey Bob! I’m curious as to your thoughts on the new Rustler 10 at your size. Figured a ski like that would be up your alley for bumps and trees but still hold at speed
Love the Rustler 10! I did, however, have more in common with the Declivity in that 102 range as it has more pep and energy. I also like the flatter overall profile more than the dramatic splay in the tips and tails of the Rustler as it delivers more smoothness and predictability in softer snow.
What boots do you think I should look at for my mutant feet? I have accessory navicular bones that protrude further medially than my medial malleolus in my ankles. I’ve tried 3 different boots with fittings by a “specialist” but no success, they all press that bone to the point of bruising it within a day or two.
The Tecnica Mach 1 120 (or another appropriate flex) is worth a look. They are easily formed to accommodate an accessory navicular. Also, please ensure you have a custom footbed first before doing any work to boots.
I have Head i.Titans that need retirement and Jeff suggested I replace them with the Head E-rally and protector binding. Isn't it quite a bit narrower? 77 to compared to 84? I live in the Alberta/BC rockies.
I’m so tempted to get a pair of the veloce 130 on Dalbellos clearance sale. I don’t need another boot and don’t need a 130 but for the price I almost want to try it. I tried on the veloce 100 locally and it was super comfortable.
I am very impressed with the Veloce 130's fit and performance. If we're looking at the same deal, and they have your size, it does seem like a good value to me.
Hello, in you quiver which one you will prefer to practice freeride for fun, and how tall are you, sir ? Thanks to all team for shearing so great contents.
How much do you feel the difference in performance between the pivot and strive? Ive been a bit of a pivot stan in large part because the metal construction just makes sense to me but i find myself wondering if im just fooling myself and other bindings offer equal or better performance. I dont love that pivot olis one of the only binding that can give you a false click in or a misalignment. Doesnt happen often but it probably has more quirks than any other binding.
I find that I can tell the difference in softer snow, bumps, trees, and generally off-piste applications more than on-trail. At the same time, I'm more than happy skiing a Strive on the Bent 100 or the Declivity 102 in those zones and I don't ever feel myself longing for a Pivot. I do love the all-metal construction and the flex you can get, but I don't think a Strive (or similar Griffon, Attack) even comes close to ruining a ski experience.
@SkiEssentials Could you elaborate on what the difference is you feel in those terrains, and what make you prefer the strive on those skis in particular?
@@AllenSmithe It's a suspension feel. The Pivot has a smoother and more predictable feel in soft snow, bumps, crud, etc. as more of the ski moves underfoot while Strives, etc. have more of a flat spot. The flat spot feels more comforting and direct in an on-trail situation, but I'd also say that these are minimal differences at most.
@SkiEssentials interesting, thank you. I've only skied the strive on a pair of SR88s mostly(ish) on piste, vs the pivots I've taken everywhere. Certainly never felt any shred of lacking on piste, but subliminally felt more comfortable taking risking in clumpy and tricky snow off piste on the pivots. I felt the same with my Attacks; never worried about them trust wise but just felt the release was more acute, maybe less adaptive or circumstantial if that makes sense. I feel like my closest calls were in slo mo twists on a pivot that released at the last minute but rarely did it pop me out prematurely. It felt more fluid, less static I guess is what I mean.
Would you choose the bent 90 Over The Stance 84 in the bumps? And would you generally recommend that choice to other people over the other one. Or is your choice specific to your body type and ability?
I suppose if you sent me out for a bump day, I'd take the Stance as it's a bit more supportive. It's also more versatile for me at my size. The Bent, though, is considerably easier to ski, especially from a sliding/skidding perspective.
@ Didn’t it bother you that the flex pattern on the Locator 112 is quite symmetrical and does not have softer tips vs tails? I am asking this as I have quite a similar skiing style to you and the skis I bought based on your advice are my favorite (Montero AR, Declivity 108). And a last question please, would you say the locator 112 is better for variable snow than the older Backland 107? Many thanks!
Are you inquiring about Booster straps, or just power straps in general? If booster, I used to be a big fan, but then I found that they were just not delivering the type of response that I wanted. I went back to the stock straps, and have found that the new ones that are booster-style with the ratchet (non-velcro) are awesome. The flex of the plastic in the boot is elastic enough for me and I just don't need the booster elasticity anymore.
I will never own a quiver this extensive. However, I find the information, the descriptions and explanations very informative. I'm thinking I could get by with 3 pair max
We still have a ZX 100 demo close by, so I can grab it if I wish. Compared to the Declivity X, the ZX has more zip in the tails and a bit less smoothness. The ZX feels light and energetic while the Declivity X is sturdier and more powerful.
Wow... You guys have a lot of boots.. I don't even know what low volume - high volume is.. It sounds like high volume is a denser padding.. I raced on something similar to that Salomon Super Forcer.. I love Stockli and I would love to try the Montero AR..
I don’t think padding density is changed between LV, MV, and HV boots. I think it is more about how much volume of space is available for the foot. Some people have lower arches and lower profile feet compared to others so LV might be more appropriate for them as compared to someone with a massive foot arch who might get a MV or HV boot.
Think of volume in scientific terms in regards to the shell--how many cubic centimeters (or ml) of water can the shell hold? Low volume boots can hold less water, and will therefore be tighter on your feet. If you look at the Head boot catalog, they actually include the cc measurement of their boots (at least they used to in the past) and I think this is a very clean way of thinking of the fit of the boot. The liner is a separate issue, and that is far more manufacturer and model based. Within Lange even, the Shadow 130 LV liner is a lot softer and less dense than the RS 130 LV, which has stiffer and denser foam.
The line must be drawn somewhere, I suppose. Since I still have the Kore 93, I haven't been too preoccupied with sourcing a 99. We have them at our retail shop for demo, so if the mood ever strikes, I can just grab one there.
I don't think so. Personally, I don't love skis much narrower than 75ish mm underfoot. Since I don't have a race background, I have a hard time balancing on such narrow skis. I prefer a slightly wider platform, so the Blizzard Thunderbird R15 at 76 mm underfoot is more my style.
Bob! You missed the Solly F9's!!! This was actually my first ski. Left it being in Austria as i couldn't take two skis back. Regretted it ever since. ⛷
My colleague, during the winter season in Kitzbuhel 94/95, bought and brought home a brand new pair of sf9's. Her stoke over these skis lives with me still many many winter seasons later.
The product exists. This is what I found. You may need to get longer screws or you may be fine with the existing ones in the bindings. I'd make sure, as always, to have any binding work done by a certified binding technician! www.slopestylebreck.com/pivot-14-replacement-gripwalk-afd.html
I got a horizontal ski storage rack from storeyourboard.com for the basement and it works great. Also some wire racks for the boots. Still, there's some overflow.
I think you’re looking super light on the around 100mm underfoot all mountain skis. You should probably add another Bent 100. Jokes aside. I don’t understand why you’d own a quiver this large and not have any fat powder skis. Surely one of the perks of working in industry is that you can justify owning a ski like that even if it gets cracked out a handful of times a season. And this is coming from someone with a quiver that only covers from 101 to 108.
I've found that 104 is plenty to own. If we're forecasted to have a big storm, I'll simply head up to our retail shop and grab something wider--that's the real perk here, you have access to the skis without having to own and store them!
K2 96c vs Bent 100 which is better in snow, and which is better on harder snow? I love the Enforcer BUT it's a burly beast compared to the 96C K2 for bumps, trees, etc.....but Enforcer holds on firm snow. SO looking for Enforcer shape and performance on hard snow, with K2 forgivness off trail but also more lift off the snow which K2 I found wasn't that great at.
I'm a bit top heavy to fully enjoy the K2, as the shovel is quite flexible. I can get about 85% of he way there, but the 15% of the tip is foldable for heavier skiers. Not saying the Bent is too stiff, but at least it's supposed to be that way and you can expect it. I still really like the playfulness and ease of use of the Bent, just not expecting Enforcer-like performance. I'd also check out the Kastle ZX 100 and Salomon QST 98 for a ski in this range that can mix it up.
@@SkiEssentials yeah when I tried the k2 it was floppy but sooo easy to ski, but then I got on the ENforcer 89 and was laughing my way down the trails, that ski I loved so that draws me to the enforcer 99 or santa ana 97, but I'm afraid the new one is stiff and more heavy than the older one.....i can't have 2 can I????
@@CC-ys8qq You're asking the wrong people if you are looking to pare down or reduce amount of skis. Santa Ana is a totally logical choice here, by the way. It's basically a more directional Unleashed 98.
Nope. And I wish I never did before. That goes for both hardgoods and softgoods. I truly wish I had kept all of my outfits over the years and made some type of proper storage for old skis and bindings. Boots, those can get tossed unless it's a classic.
Bob is a national treasure.
Thanks again for the videos Bob. As someone who drastically overthinks most purchases, you have steered me in the right direction twice now. The Enforcer 104 Unlimited and Duke PT is a great combo for wind hold days, holidays when I want to get away from the crowd, or my annual climb up the notch road.. Yeah, it's heavy. But if I want to shave weight from my touring set up the best place to start is on the treadmill. Can't wait for some snow now!
Great video, as always, Bob. I always value your opinion and insights, me being 48 with 4 kids that I ski with, and being 6'3 and 250 pounds. Thanks for sharing your collection with us.
My pleasure! Glad us large guys with lots of kids can connect!
I always find these quiver breakdowns super interesting, especially since I live and work at a resort (Deer Valley / Park City) and have a growing quiver of my own. What I’ve noticed from watching your other videos is that there are skis you say you love (like the Justis) and skis you actually buy (like the Declivity X 102). It’s such a great example of "know thyself."
It’s cool to see how you’ve put your quiver together and hear which skis end up in the truck most often. I feel like I’m still chasing my "Goldilocks" ski-the one I instinctively grab for most days. During our epic 600" winter, it was the Salomon Blank, but last year I leaned on the K2 Mindbender 89Ti. This season, I think it might be my new Blizzard Anomaly 88. Still, I’m hunting for that perfect 99-102mm daily driver that can carve while staying playful across the mountain.
The Mantra 102 has been solid but can feel tiring after a few hours. That Declivity is definitely on my radar, though the Justis sounds pretty tempting too!
Thanks for the comment, it's fun to see the reactions and the audience's perspectives!
The best piece of ski equipment for me in the last few years is a Zipfit liner. I wanted the best performance i could get and got a pair with the leather lining. They hold your feet like concrete, but warm and comfy. They blew me away from the first turn. They made my meager quiver more responsive, like getting new skis. I ski a 140 Rossi WC boot and they stiffened up with the Zip so took out the top heel screw and they are perfect. I ski a Rossi CX80 @ 180cm/20m and a Rossi Experience 100 @ 182cm/24m if it dumps. Your quiver would drive me nukkin futz! too many and too nuanced. I know I need to broaden my horizon to some newer stuff but my take is "it's a poor workman who blames his tools". Keeping it simple works for me. I live in JH Wy and ski a lot. I like your reviews keep it up.
Definitely looking forward to the Zip and combining the comfy forefoot with the solid heel. In reality, I'll use about three of these skis this winter, so most of it is fluff.
@@SkiEssentials neoprene wool interior combo is amazing. The fullness of the cuff leads to excellent transfer. You'll be extremely happy.
I also don't get the liner first method, I still just stuff them in and step in.
I actually find it easier to ‘world cup’ step in with liner on.. get used to it pretty quickly.. the cork heel lock is so distinct, it too hard to step into while in the boot!
@@Lo-cj6ski I hear you, and I want it to work for me, but it just didn't. What shell are you in?
@@AllenSmithe technica Mach 1 MV 130
Hi Bob, you guys should have called these episodes : " What's in the Ski Room " 😂😂😂😂 , my mates call me crazy for buying new boots almost every season and having 4 pairs of skis, but you and Jeff are on another level !!! last February I bought the Fischer RC4 Pro MV Boa 27.5 , the best boot I ever owned and I had many in 54 years of skiing, it comes standard with the Zipfit Liner, had the shell on the inside ankles slightly punched out, got my feet taped up with the cushion pads used for a foam liner, they heated up the liner , I put them on, slid into the shells and 10 minutes later all done, it's the best fitting liner and boot combo ever, comfortable, warm, but still a high performance boot with 140 flex, I was a bit worried about getting into the shell with the liner already on the foot because of the Boa system, but I shouldn't have been, the boa shell opens nicely and absolutely not a problem , my advise in putting on the boot with Zipfit liner is definitely this: lace up the liner nice and snug and then slide into the shell, after a few times it's as easy as, the reason this is recommended by Zipfit, is to NOT push the cork material into the wrong spots when you step in with the liner inside the shell as the cork mixture never hardens totally, that's what makes the Zipfit Liners sooo great, they constantly can adjust to changes to your foot which other liners can't , be it standard foam , Foamed or Intuition. I had them all, but nothing comes close to this Liner !!! Enjoy the Zipfit it's awesome.
Thank you so much for this information, we're still learning about the Zips, and having empirical advice like this is great. I still want to avoid the lacing and racer entry process, but if it comes to that, then I'll do it.
Thanks not a quiver, that's an armoury! Thanks for sharing, Bob! Just like Jeff's video, I really enjoyed hearing you two talk us through all your equipment - but, unlike Jeff, I'm very happy to see that you're also a believer of the strapless ski pole lifestyle!
I almost cringe when I see people fussing with their straps. If they only knew how simple life could be....
Looks like you both have the Head e-rally. One of my favs. I also have Blizzard FIS Slalom, Dynastar FIS GS, Fischer RC4 CT, Rossignol Hero Elite +TI, Nordica Enforcer 100, Salomon Qst Blank and Armada JJ I picked up for $50 bucks at a swap for rock powder ski. Love them all!
Good rundown, Bob. Will be interested to hear how you get on with the Zipfits. Cheers.
Your skiing on the Stockli's looked the best I've see you do. They do what you ask them to do. Nice work, man.
It feels great, too! Thanks so much.
Bob is a man after my own heart. I don't have that many but I love me some Atomic and Nordica. You just can't go wrong with either. Only thing lacking is maybe one set of K2 or Volkl skis sprinkled in there. Bob can shred for a taller guy! You guys should upload more raw riding/testing content! We enjoy watching it! Cheers to this season! ⛷️
Every time I get on a Mantra 88 I want one. I also LOVE the new Blaze 104. If I were to do a Volkl quiver of two, it'd be those. As for K2, I like the 106C, but there's a lot of competition in that range.
Love watching the quiver videos. Montero AR and Declivity X 102 would be such an amazing two ski quiver here in New England. 👍
Yeah, that's a good two ski set for sure. That said, I'm betting the new Bent 100 will get the most snow time.
Line (Blade?) Optic and any Black Crows additions would be sweet!
I'd pretty much trade it all for a Line Optic 88 and a Black Crows Justis and then call it a day!
Oh boy is this great❄️⛷I want to be like bob when I grow up
I wonder how an Blizzard Anomaly 84 or a Armada declivity 82 would compare to your AR and fit in your quiver (maybe replace the enforcer 88????). I wonder what you use when you just have a bump day? I was expecting you to have a narrower ski that you use in bumps. I find myself skiing a lot of groomers and bumps on days that don't have fresh snow and have really been looking at one of those two narrow all mountain skis.
I'd personally rather be on a lighter and more flexible wider ski like the Bent 90 than a narrower and stiffer ski like the Declivity, although I think that and the Anomaly work great for bumps. I'll give up some width for flex, I suppose. I also don't think I want narrower for that Enforcer type of ski, if I'm replacing the 88, I'm going with that width or wider up to 92/93. If I were skiing groomers and bumps, I'd take the Anomaly. Of my skis, probably the Montero and give up a bit of bump performance.
do you size down in boots? is 275mm you actual foot length?
Most people believe their feet are bigger than they really are and their ski boots are too big. For example I just saw some Salomon shifts for sale where the guy claims to be a size 10 foot but the ski boot is a 29.5 which is not a 10 lol. When I sold ski boots people would tell me their shoe size when I didn’t ask,. Then once measured it would always be smaller than they claimed. I even realized this about myself. (Wore 9.5us shoes, but measured at a 8.5us on a scanning tool, and dropped my ski boot down from 27.5 to 26.5 and could actually fit a 25.5 if I wanted to do some shell work.
It’s not 275mm. It’s 27.5 in mondo sizing.
I wear an 11 street shoe normally and a 27.5 mondo size shell, which roughly equates to a US 9, so yes, I size down in boots. I've skied in 26.5's before and just find that I can get almost as good performance in the 27.5's with a lot more comfort and warmth, so I've moved that route over the past three years.
Please Bob, try a shorter set of poles! I would say that you could easily use 5cm shorter!
Short poles help staying in a low aggressive position, long poles force to much extension at the wrong time into the turn!
....please give short poles a try!
I'm 175cm and I ski 120cm poles down to 110cm, 120cm in the woods/powder and 110cm for high speed carving/groomers. Even 105cm is sill very fun to me for high speed carves but it starts to be annoyingly short in the chairlift queue.
The 135's that I use are only for local race days, even though by the book, that's pretty close to the proper length for me. The 125's that I use everyday are pretty short already. In the video I note that since I don't use straps, I can easily grip the pole two finger notches lower to bring it down to about a 120 for bumps. I used to use 120's because I skied moguls and telemark, but moving back to more alpine skiing, I bumped back up to 125. Also, I really enjoy skiing with no poles.
What binding do you recommend for the AR? I just purchased a 2024 and it came flat.
Salomon Strive 16 would be a great pairing. 14 would work well too. I think those bindings feel great on more carving oriented skis like the AR, but they still retain all-mountain versatility too.
@ thanks for the response! I saw they have some type of demo binding called a strive 13D, but I didn’t know if there was a pro/con to that one. I will look at the 14 and 16
Hey Bob, thanks for sharing.
Love my enforcer 88s and also looking to upgrade and can't decide was looking at anomaly 88 or enforcer 89 what are your thoughts?
I found the new Enforcer to be an amazing carver with rock-solid performance--more now than ever before. The Anomaly kind of went the other way (not by a lot) in adding some versatility to the Brahma 88. It's fair to say the Anomaly (viewed as new Brahma) and Enforcer have swapped spots. Now, I LOVE the versatility of the Anomaly, and haven't found it to lack when it comes to carving capabilities, especially since I can't touch the ceiling of any of these skis. I was surprised to find that the Anomaly felt like a more natural ski to me as I've always loved the Enforcer shape and style at all widths.
Thank you for sharing Bob. Totally agree with the comment about how important a good boot fitting is. Wish I had low volume or even mid volume feet….more options available. Love the ole throw back skis (had some Elan Comprex S RC in a 20something and wish I still had them for the wall).
As a mature skier I will say backcountry is good for ya. Keeps you in shape and you learn to slow down and see so many more sights you never see when at the resort.
Great stuff. I’m always up for trying new stuff so I say add some black crows to the mix. Have a great year on the slopes.
I do love cross-country, especially with my kids. I really enjoy how the removal of control makes going downhill at 8mph totally exhilarating.
will you do another video on the K2 FLEX (aka FULL TILT) ??
It's not currently on the books, but we are getting more and more information about 2026 product, boots included, so if a K2 Flex strikes our eyes, I'm sure we'll put some time in!
What would be your dedicated powder ski if you were say stationed at Alta or Japan for a whole season? Cheers. I sat this because I'm about your size and that's where I go. Cheers.
For powder only, like I can have more skis? If that's the case I am taking a strong look at a Head Kore 117 and the Salomon QST X at 116. I like lighter somewhat stiffer powder skis rather than heavier twins like a Revolt 121 or a Rossignol Blackops, although those'd be great from time to time. For the whole season, I'm going lighter.
Great review, Bob. Loved the Zipfit screen comments!
Your skis vary in length much more than did Jeff's.
Do you have small feet for your height? I also wear 27.5 boots , but I'm only 5'11”. And I have the same issue with width. I wear Scarpa TX Pro tele boots and their 102 last is narrow for me.
Super Force 203cm...old school! When I was a kid, we wouldn't be caught dead on anything shorter than 200s - "long skis truck, short skis suck." Except for the binding mounting position, I'd believe they were from my high school era. Our skis back then looked like only 1/3 of the ski was behind you. And you really had to keep your nose over your tips to turn them. Radii were measured on miles, not meters.
And it’s good to see that Look Pivots still exist (I ski tele, so I don’t pay attention to Alpine bindngs). I had them (or a version of them) back in the 80s.
I have the 2021 Bentchetler (as they were called back then) 100s and love them. Mine have fully capped sidewalls, so did Atomic change the sidewall for 2022? Good all-around ski with middling width, smeary and surfy, enough tail rocker to feel comfortable skiing switch, and light enough for climbing (though the tail splay isn’t ideal for skinning up.). And love the graphics!
Yes I have small feet for my height (and weight) and it gives me problems. Wide forefoot, high insteps. I had the Scarpa T1 for years and they fit great in the 27.5. The Pivot is a timeless piece for sure!
Have been looking to upgrade this season. On the east coast, and want something for all mountain activities. Have been going between the mantra 88, qst 92, stormrider 88, bent 90. What do you think overall just gives the best skiing experience for east coast all mountain? Any suggestions other than what I have been looking at?
If you're truly looking for overall east coast performance, I think it's tough to look past the QST 92--that ski is so well-rounded and versatile. That said, if you want to emphasize carving performance, lean to the Mantra or Stormrider. If you want more playfulness and flex, then Bent. The QST, though, is a wonderful blend of all of them.
@@SkiEssentials thank you so much!
hi, can i ask for ski recomendation
Im beetwen 2 bind adn 2 skies, dynafit rotation 12 vs salomon shift 13 and salomon qst 98 and elan ripstick 96. I want to make 1 ski quiver for skituring mostly focused on downhill that i can take for few days on rest too
I'd go Ripstick for a weight savings.
Really love the ski pole quiver.. never seen that before
I also had a sweet pair of pink Scott poles as well but those got stolen at the beginning of last season.
The hidden second row of boots 😅😅
Bob, you could replace the Enforcer 88 with the Kastle MX88! I just skied with a buddy who swears by the Zipfits and I might have to take that plunge as well. Thx
I think I'd go wider and more versatile. I think there's be too much overlap with MX and AR. Black Crows Serpo or Captis, Salomon Stance 90, maybe a bit more playful to Line Optic 88?
Thanks for the video! Out of interest, where are the bindings on both of your Bent 100s mounted?
Factory line!
Thanks for sharing your quiver and all the great reviews. My daily driver is a Bonafide but looking for a less demanding mid 80 ski for carving but also versatile enough to pop in and out of the bumps/trees. Would you choose Montero AR, Anomaly 88 or even a SR 88? Mostly softer snow conditions out West. Thanks for your input.
I think you're looking at the Anomaly here, especially if you're used to the Bonafide. The Anomaly 88 takes a bit of the edge off with more rocker, taper, and a slightly more flexible build. I fear the Stormrider is on the light side while the Montero is on the carvy side.
Thanks for the reply. Will hopefully demo Anomaly shortly. I am 173cm tall and 180lbs so wondering what length? I fall between sizes so wonder if I should go up to 176 or the 170. Thanks again for all the great reviews and advice.
@@ScooterM1 I think the 170 is the way to go here as the skis are pretty sturdy and there's not much need to go over head-high.
Zipfit workhorse. Interesting. Neoprene only stays warm if it's wet and next to the skin, which macerates the skin (I've tried skiing in neoprene socks in the past - mistakes were made).
I have Boot Doctor custom liners in my RS 130, but still had to cut out the big toe and make a tuck tape (house sheathing vapour barrier tape) custom toe so my foot can operate properly. All liners have weird pointy toes.
Edit: omg, the sticky heel inner leather in the Zipfit Workhorse sounds like a dream. Feeling the heel loosen and boot drop when pulling the ski up is terrifying. Will see if I can find some in my area.
The forefoot material may not be pure neoprene--apologies if I am mistaken, we're still new to the Zipfit game. Also, the forefoot material is lined with what seems to be some type of wool, so there's definitely no neoprene to skin direct contact.
Hey Bob! I’m curious as to your thoughts on the new Rustler 10 at your size. Figured a ski like that would be up your alley for bumps and trees but still hold at speed
Love the Rustler 10! I did, however, have more in common with the Declivity in that 102 range as it has more pep and energy. I also like the flatter overall profile more than the dramatic splay in the tips and tails of the Rustler as it delivers more smoothness and predictability in softer snow.
What boots do you think I should look at for my mutant feet? I have accessory navicular bones that protrude further medially than my medial malleolus in my ankles. I’ve tried 3 different boots with fittings by a “specialist” but no success, they all press that bone to the point of bruising it within a day or two.
The Tecnica Mach 1 120 (or another appropriate flex) is worth a look. They are easily formed to accommodate an accessory navicular. Also, please ensure you have a custom footbed first before doing any work to boots.
I have Head i.Titans that need retirement and Jeff suggested I replace them with the Head E-rally and protector binding. Isn't it quite a bit narrower? 77 to compared to 84? I live in the Alberta/BC rockies.
78 to 84, but yes still narrower. You could certainly go with a direct replacement if you're simply looking for the same ski!
What boots are you wearing with the Armada Declivity X 102 ? And the Atomic 2025 bent 100?
Those are the Kastle K130P boots.
I’m so tempted to get a pair of the veloce 130 on Dalbellos clearance sale. I don’t need another boot and don’t need a 130 but for the price I almost want to try it. I tried on the veloce 100 locally and it was super comfortable.
I am very impressed with the Veloce 130's fit and performance. If we're looking at the same deal, and they have your size, it does seem like a good value to me.
Hello, in you quiver which one you will prefer to practice freeride for fun, and how tall are you, sir ?
Thanks to all team for shearing so great contents.
I love the Bent 100 for freeride for fun. I'm 6/2 225.
How much do you feel the difference in performance between the pivot and strive? Ive been a bit of a pivot stan in large part because the metal construction just makes sense to me but i find myself wondering if im just fooling myself and other bindings offer equal or better performance. I dont love that pivot olis one of the only binding that can give you a false click in or a misalignment. Doesnt happen often but it probably has more quirks than any other binding.
I find that I can tell the difference in softer snow, bumps, trees, and generally off-piste applications more than on-trail. At the same time, I'm more than happy skiing a Strive on the Bent 100 or the Declivity 102 in those zones and I don't ever feel myself longing for a Pivot. I do love the all-metal construction and the flex you can get, but I don't think a Strive (or similar Griffon, Attack) even comes close to ruining a ski experience.
@SkiEssentials Could you elaborate on what the difference is you feel in those terrains, and what make you prefer the strive on those skis in particular?
@@AllenSmithe It's a suspension feel. The Pivot has a smoother and more predictable feel in soft snow, bumps, crud, etc. as more of the ski moves underfoot while Strives, etc. have more of a flat spot. The flat spot feels more comforting and direct in an on-trail situation, but I'd also say that these are minimal differences at most.
@SkiEssentials interesting, thank you. I've only skied the strive on a pair of SR88s mostly(ish) on piste, vs the pivots I've taken everywhere. Certainly never felt any shred of lacking on piste, but subliminally felt more comfortable taking risking in clumpy and tricky snow off piste on the pivots. I felt the same with my Attacks; never worried about them trust wise but just felt the release was more acute, maybe less adaptive or circumstantial if that makes sense. I feel like my closest calls were in slo mo twists on a pivot that released at the last minute but rarely did it pop me out prematurely. It felt more fluid, less static I guess is what I mean.
47! Thought you were much younger. It must be the slick hats 🧢 😅
yeah I was wondering if I heard that right. He meant 37 right?
@@michaels7978 A lot of ski means a lot of vitamin D to keep one young and healthy!
The hats help! While I'm not bald, I do have a lot of grey, so the hat covers that up quite nicely.
This is a nice compliment! You heard right the first time, 47 it is.
Would you choose the bent 90 Over The Stance 84 in the bumps? And would you generally recommend that choice to other people over the other one. Or is your choice specific to your body type and ability?
I suppose if you sent me out for a bump day, I'd take the Stance as it's a bit more supportive. It's also more versatile for me at my size. The Bent, though, is considerably easier to ski, especially from a sliding/skidding perspective.
Oh boy is this great❄️⛷I want to be like bob when I grow up. Do you guys use any Jskis. Would like to see a review on something by them this year
I would too. I like skis with lots of fiberglass, but am not buying skis I can't try first or at least have a comparison review.
We don't use any JSkis, but they look great! Fun designs, smart builds, and awesome-looking shapes!
Bob, which of the following would you personally choose as a dedicated powder touring ski? Locator 112, Draco, QST X or Pescado?
Only powder? Only touring? Locator.
@ why Locator over Draco?
@@SnowsailorB lighter
@ Didn’t it bother you that the flex pattern on the Locator 112 is quite symmetrical and does not have softer tips vs tails? I am asking this as I have quite a similar skiing style to you and the skis I bought based on your advice are my favorite (Montero AR, Declivity 108). And a last question please, would you say the locator 112 is better for variable snow than the older Backland 107? Many thanks!
Thanks for another great video! As you are a boot man, Bob, what is your take on Powerstraps?
Are you inquiring about Booster straps, or just power straps in general? If booster, I used to be a big fan, but then I found that they were just not delivering the type of response that I wanted. I went back to the stock straps, and have found that the new ones that are booster-style with the ratchet (non-velcro) are awesome. The flex of the plastic in the boot is elastic enough for me and I just don't need the booster elasticity anymore.
I will never own a quiver this extensive. However, I find the information, the descriptions and explanations very informative. I'm thinking I could get by with 3 pair max
3 is more than plenty for most skiers.
35:55 bob! Heck yes!
It's all the skis!
No Kastle ZX100? How does it compare to the Declivity 102?
We still have a ZX 100 demo close by, so I can grab it if I wish. Compared to the Declivity X, the ZX has more zip in the tails and a bit less smoothness. The ZX feels light and energetic while the Declivity X is sturdier and more powerful.
Great video bob! Another fellow big man here at 6’5 250. I’m curious as your thoughts to the Lange Shadow 130 vs the 120
I tried the 120 before getting my 130. While the difference didn't feel huge or vast, I'd still think your stats put you in the 130 fairly easily.
Wow... You guys have a lot of boots.. I don't even know what low volume - high volume is.. It sounds like high volume is a denser padding..
I raced on something similar to that Salomon Super Forcer..
I love Stockli and I would love to try the Montero AR..
I don’t think padding density is changed between LV, MV, and HV boots. I think it is more about how much volume of space is available for the foot. Some people have lower arches and lower profile feet compared to others so LV might be more appropriate for them as compared to someone with a massive foot arch who might get a MV or HV boot.
Think of volume in scientific terms in regards to the shell--how many cubic centimeters (or ml) of water can the shell hold? Low volume boots can hold less water, and will therefore be tighter on your feet. If you look at the Head boot catalog, they actually include the cc measurement of their boots (at least they used to in the past) and I think this is a very clean way of thinking of the fit of the boot. The liner is a separate issue, and that is far more manufacturer and model based. Within Lange even, the Shadow 130 LV liner is a lot softer and less dense than the RS 130 LV, which has stiffer and denser foam.
@@SkiEssentials So the volume of the boot is the area in which the liner can fit.. High Volume means more area where the liner can fit..
Bob, no showing of the Kore 99?
The line must be drawn somewhere, I suppose. Since I still have the Kore 93, I haven't been too preoccupied with sourcing a 99. We have them at our retail shop for demo, so if the mood ever strikes, I can just grab one there.
Would you ever add a Blizzard HRC to the mix?
I don't think so. Personally, I don't love skis much narrower than 75ish mm underfoot. Since I don't have a race background, I have a hard time balancing on such narrow skis. I prefer a slightly wider platform, so the Blizzard Thunderbird R15 at 76 mm underfoot is more my style.
Bob! You missed the Solly F9's!!! This was actually my first ski. Left it being in Austria as i couldn't take two skis back. Regretted it ever since. ⛷
The 1997 Salomon Super Force 9 is such a sweet ski
My colleague, during the winter season in Kitzbuhel 94/95, bought and brought home a brand new pair of sf9's. Her stoke over these skis lives with me still many many winter seasons later.
So can I convert my DIN Pivot 14s to be GW compatible?
The product exists. This is what I found. You may need to get longer screws or you may be fine with the existing ones in the bindings. I'd make sure, as always, to have any binding work done by a certified binding technician!
www.slopestylebreck.com/pivot-14-replacement-gripwalk-afd.html
only SS WC boots 🙏✌️
Good god…..where do you keep all of that equipment???!!!😂
I got a horizontal ski storage rack from storeyourboard.com for the basement and it works great. Also some wire racks for the boots. Still, there's some overflow.
I think you’re looking super light on the around 100mm underfoot all mountain skis. You should probably add another Bent 100.
Jokes aside. I don’t understand why you’d own a quiver this large and not have any fat powder skis. Surely one of the perks of working in industry is that you can justify owning a ski like that even if it gets cracked out a handful of times a season.
And this is coming from someone with a quiver that only covers from 101 to 108.
I've found that 104 is plenty to own. If we're forecasted to have a big storm, I'll simply head up to our retail shop and grab something wider--that's the real perk here, you have access to the skis without having to own and store them!
How is bob almost 47, i thought he was a lot closer to 40
Not almost 47, past 47 on my way to 48. Thanks, though!
K2 96c vs Bent 100 which is better in snow, and which is better on harder snow? I love the Enforcer BUT it's a burly beast compared to the 96C K2 for bumps, trees, etc.....but Enforcer holds on firm snow. SO looking for Enforcer shape and performance on hard snow, with K2 forgivness off trail but also more lift off the snow which K2 I found wasn't that great at.
I'm a bit top heavy to fully enjoy the K2, as the shovel is quite flexible. I can get about 85% of he way there, but the 15% of the tip is foldable for heavier skiers. Not saying the Bent is too stiff, but at least it's supposed to be that way and you can expect it. I still really like the playfulness and ease of use of the Bent, just not expecting Enforcer-like performance. I'd also check out the Kastle ZX 100 and Salomon QST 98 for a ski in this range that can mix it up.
@@SkiEssentials yeah when I tried the k2 it was floppy but sooo easy to ski, but then I got on the ENforcer 89 and was laughing my way down the trails, that ski I loved so that draws me to the enforcer 99 or santa ana 97, but I'm afraid the new one is stiff and more heavy than the older one.....i can't have 2 can I????
@@CC-ys8qq You're asking the wrong people if you are looking to pare down or reduce amount of skis. Santa Ana is a totally logical choice here, by the way. It's basically a more directional Unleashed 98.
wait youcan just put liners into a microwave? xD
Some liners, but not for 40 minutes.
Wow, you and Jeff never sell anything do you?
Nope. And I wish I never did before. That goes for both hardgoods and softgoods. I truly wish I had kept all of my outfits over the years and made some type of proper storage for old skis and bindings. Boots, those can get tossed unless it's a classic.
How do you convince the wife that there is no such thing as too many skis?
I have found that as long as I keep getting my wife new skis, then she is fine with my collection.