Formula 1 Pole position rankings 1950-2019
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- Formula one pole position rankings 1950-2019
correction
7:44 Teo Fabi is different picture in 1985 GermanyGP
×Jean-Pierre Jarier →〇Jean-Pierre Jacques
▼name list▼
english name
Jacques Villeneuve
Jack Brabham
Jacque Laffite
Charles Leclerc
Jean-Pierre Jabouille
Jean-Pierre Beltoise
Jean Alesi
Giancarlo Baghetti
Giancarlo Fisichella
Giuseppe Farina
Jo Siffert
Jody Scheckter
Johnnie Parsons
John Herbert
John Surtees
John Watson
Gilles Villeneuve
Stirling Moss
Sebastian Vettel
Daniel Ricciardo
Daniel Ricciardo
Dan Gurney
Thierry Boutsen
Didier Pironi
Ayrton Senna
Alan Jones
Alain Prost
Alberto Ascari
Alessandro Nannini
Innes Ireland
Vittorio Brambilla
Wolfgang von Trips
Edmund Irvine
Emerson Fittipaldi
Elio de Angelis
Olivier Denis Panis
Carlos Pace
Carlos Reutemann
Kimi Raikkonen
Graham Hill
Clay Regazzoni
Gunner Nilsson
Keke Rosberg
Gerhard Berger
Sam Hanks
James Hunt
Jenson Button
Jimmy Bryan
Jim Clark
Jim Rathmann
Jacques Ickx
Jackie Stewart
Damon Hill
Denis Hulme
David Coulthard
Tony Brooks
Troy Ruttman
Nigel Mansell
Niki Lauda
Nico Rosberg
Nelson Piquet
Heinz-Harald Frentzen
Pastor Maldonado
Pat Flaherty
Patrick Tambay
Patrick Depailler
Valtteri Bottas
Peter Gethin
Peter Collins
Peter Revson
Piero Taruffi
Bill Vukovich
Juan Pablo Montoya
Juan Manuel Fangio
Phil Hill
Felipe Massa
Fernando Alonso
François Cévert
Bruce McLaren
Froilan Gonzalez
Heikki Kovalainen
Pedro Rodríguez
Bob Sweikert
Mark Webber
Michael Hawthorn
Max Verstappen
Mario Andretti
Mika Hakkinen
Michele Alboreto
Michael Schumacher
Maurice Trintignant
Jarno Trulli
Joakim Bonnier
Jochen Mass
Jochen Rindt
Ralf Schumacher
Lee Wallard
Riccardo Patrese
Richie Ginther
Luigi Musso
Lewis Hamilton
Rubens Barrichello
Ludovico Scarfiotti
René Arnoux
Roger Ward
Ronnie Peterson
Robert Kubica
Lorenzo Bandini
Luigi Musso/Juan Manuel Fangio
Andrea De Cesaris
Walt Faulkner
Eugenio Castellotti
Eddie Sachs
Christopher Arthur Amon
Jerry Hoyt
Jack McGrath
Jean-Pierre Jacques
Stuart Nigel Lewis-Evans
Dick Rathmann
Teodorico "Teo" Fabi
Duke Nalon
Tom Pryce
Nicolas "Nico" Hülkenberg
Nick Lars Heidfeld
Pat O'Connor
Bruno Giacomelli
Fred Agabashian
Mike Parkes
Johnny Thomson
▼source▼
en.wikipedia.o...
▼twitter▼
/ labentame
▼Friend site▼
777entame.lab777
/ @ブルーバードのアイドル研究所
The video is produced by quoting Article 32 of the Japanese Copyright Act.
I will respond promptly.
sport.labxxx@gmail.com
Man, seeing Senna stop after 1994 R3 hit me hard....
Yeah 😔🇧🇷🇧🇷
Hit Senna harder, that's why he stopped.
Me too. 😭
I watched that live, I was a kid still but I still remember how everyone around me were completely shocked. Good times when Sunday family program was watching F1.
Yes. It was terrible. I was at Imola back than. It was terible weekend
After 26 years almost all the comments are for Senna... Magico Ayrton!!
True hero's never die
I respect senna plus Hamilton
Senna Siempre
Schumacher is a Monster and still took 20 years to do what Ayrton Senna did in only 10 years....Thats crazy.
If Senna Was live, he would be in pole position in first
f1 DIVIDED INTO TWO PARTS: BEFORE AND AFTER AYRTON SENNA!!!
In your brain only, cause u r a Senna fanboy..a Schumacher fanboy would say something similar etc etc
@@kostaskonstantinidis7318 go away kid, men are talking
Senna and Schumacher have one thing in common.
Neither of them is Jim Clark.
@@kostaskonstantinidis7318
Schumacher is a Monster and still took 20 years to do what Ayrton Senna did in only 10 years....Thats crazy.
@@kostaskonstantinidis7318 You just didn't understand F1, did you?
Senna redefined the meaning of the formula 1 qualifying by just existing.
@Neguin Prost was better in the same car, people can't accept facts. You know Prost earned more points both years in mcLaren agains Senna don't you. Bet you didn't know that. Senna won his WDC with less points than Prost, go Google it.
Senna was far superior in 1 lap pace, almost 2 seconds ahead of Prost at times, but Prost was more intelligent driving the car in the race, great contrast
@@markmark5269 nice joke kid
Mark Mark - Prost was a great driver with a different approach to race craft. But he was very rarely quicker than Senna in the same car. Furthermore, Senna was also quicker than Prost when he (Prost) was in a vastly superior car. I loved watching both of them drive and think Prost was one of the greatest F1 drivers of all time. But he was rarely close to Senna's outright pace.
@@markmark5269 Ask any racer player and you will have your answer...(Senna). Chill dude..
Who only came for Senna :)
Edit: Thank you for 360 likes :D
There will be nothing like Senna.
@@maia457br yep brazilian crash test driver
Pawel M Arschloch. 🤮🤮🤮
@@mobywatel7515 and still richer than all you family members together since the dawn of ages
Senna drove in formula one for ten years, and made that he made. Schumacher more 20 years, Lewis 13 years, Seb too. think if senna had more time ! :(
Schumacher first pole came exactly in the first race after Senna's death.
So with senna compiting schumaher wasnt been brighter like he did
Schumacher is a Monster and still took 20 years to do what Ayrton Senna did in only 10 years....Thats crazy.
@@sasukebyak no, only 15 years to equalize. And that's pretty much the only category where Schumacher needed longer.
I saw the Video like 2 Million Times now and i am sure that he for killed the car jus didn’t want to Go left ti was not his fault someone for his hands on the car!
If you Look closely you Even See Senna going left with the Body because he was shoked that the car wouldn’t turn...
@@studiofranky158 Different rules guys, Schumacher had to deal with different qualifying rules later. He prepared the cars for race in qualifying, they had to put the fuel amount for the first stint in the car, he was always quite heavy to make longer first stint. This is why he didn't have that much poles compared to wins or fastet laps and: Senna was an absolute monster on the hot lap.
Senna absolutely Destroyed on pole positions.
He took 10 years to do 65, Schumacher took 17 years to achieve 68
schu was a racing god not a qualy type of guy.
@@G0007 This is true. I think not taking pole is a strategy in itself.
Yep, for pilots with more than 100 race entries Senna has the highest proportion of pole positions, which is actually insane if you consider that drivers like Schumacher, Vettel, Alonso, Hamilton, etc, came after him and had long careers in top teams but they were still not able to achieve the same proportion of poles. And he was able to do this against the opposition of Prost, Mansell, Hill, Berger, Patrese, Piquet, and Schumacher himself.
@@truth-uncensored2426 Senna was without a doubt the fastest F1 racing driver that ever lived.
@@alexandrecl4331 and it is without a doubt impossible to compare drivers across different eras…He certainly was the best of his era.
Senna: 65/161 GPs = 40% pole positions... OMG!!!
0nly had the fastest car f0r 3 years 0r 4 if yu include 1990
Fangio: 29/51 GPs= 56,8% pole positions.
@@diegosciuto8072 hahahaaha fangio
Así es, en estadística, gana Fangio
But Fangio always has the best car. Senna came in top 10 with Lotus. The fucking 80`s LOTUS
1988: Senna, Senna, Senna, Senna, Senna, Senna, Prost, Berger, Senna, Senna, Senna, Senna, Prost, Senna, Senna, Senna.
What a legend
13 out of 16 pole positions, he was indeed a legend
Random guy: F1 is so boring Senna always win
@@carlitoxb110 All those guys complaining about mercedes and hamilton taking all those wins but in reality many season in f1 had a dominant team and driver
@@valraukardso7117 not much years.
Senna´s got the top 15 less then two years running with a medium team. Brilliant.
Schummacher took almost four complete seasons to get it.
@@LGEM1982 and also after winning 2 world championships
he got 16 fucking poles with a lotus against ferraris williams and Mclaren in 3 years. And back then they had less races
You forgot the Toleman, Ayrton first team?
He will the best forever.
@@joejohnnys e não nos esqueçamos de Mônaco by Toleman, quando o mundo da F1 viu nascer o que veio a ser o MELHOR de todos os tempos.
Senna 60 poles in 7 years and only having the best car in 2 of those. Fangio and Clark are probably the only ones who come close.
Ascari, Fangio, and Clark all have more poles per races than Senna does. Moreover, poles do not necessarily mean races. Races win championships and there is a handful of drivers with more championships than Senna.
@@helltormentor81 totally agree , nice comment
@@Thiago-ym7vq I meant 7 years in which he took 60 poles exactly. As for being out of F1, when was that? I don't recall him missing a GP.
@@helltormentor81 You don't make a good title driver. A pilot is only a pilot when he shows that he knows how to drive. When you take a fucking car and make it literally fly!
4 years. 1988-89-90-91
Ayrton Senna the best of all time !! king of Monaco, master in the rain, average pole position, race with only one gear. And competed with the best, Senna number 1 always !! 🇧🇷❤️
You is pacheco kkkk
The best is schumi !!!!
Senna tercero con el 40% de pole positions, a pesar de que su etapa de corredor quedó truncada con su muerte. Realmente fue el mejor de todos los tiempos.
una lastima verdaderamente, quizas hubiese sido tan grande y tan exitoso como Hamilton, Schumacher y Fangio..pero no sucedio lamentablemente.RIP Ayrton
Schummy - 68/308 = 22% | Hamilton 88/250 = 35% | Senna 65/161 = 40% | Clark 33/73 = 45%
Clark = GENIUS.
Fangio: 29/51 GPs= 56,8%. Total beast
This totally lines up with how I think of all them.
@@thiagomonteiro9912 Clark = having the absolute best equipment for his entire career. You do know in Clarks' day if 2 or 3 cars finished on the same lap it was unusual don't you? If more then 5 or 6 cars finished at all, also unusual.
Well I'd rather Schumacher's 7 WDC than 40% poles. Please list Senna's win ratio, it's rather shit among the best actually, and that counts more than poles.
Fazer o que o Senna fez em 1988 com o nível de pilotos que competia na fórmula 1 naquela época ninguém vai fazer outra vez.
COMO ESTÁ REGISTRADO NESSE GRÁFICO, O LIMITE DE SENNA ERA A MORTE. FOI O CARA QUE MAIS PRODUZIU EM MENOS TEMPO. ERA FODA!
sinceramente, impossivel alguem repetir oque ele fez em 9 anos, sem desvalorizar os outros pilotos más vei, não tem como.
Aprenda a ler estatísticas sff
Senna 34 anos :65 poles, 41 vitórias, 3 mundiais
Schumacher 34 anos : 55 poles, 73 vitórias 6 mundiais
Hamilton 34 anos: 88 poles , 84 vitorias, 6 mundiais
@@orangemechanical8851 Tem que colocar o número de corridas.
Schumacher - 307
Senna - 161
Hamilton - 284
@@poleposition5811 com o tempo o número de GPs aumentou bastante
Se tivesse 20 GPs na época do Fangio tbm ele teria um grande recorde
Senna se não tivesse morrido com certeza tinha muito mas de 100 poles na carreira
Schumacher teria uns títulos a menos também
Senna teve 4 titulos na pista, um foi tomado no tapetao. Pela willians no minimos mais 3 titulos ele ganharia
@@felipesolera6463 pse
9 anos 65 poles shumacher 20 anos 68 polis e tem gente q diz a o shumacher foi melhor
@@danilorodrigues2426 com 34 anos, idade que senna morreu, shumacher tinha o dobro de vitórias e titulos mundiais...
If only Senna would have lived longer
Schumacher was already there, had Senna lived longer, improving surprisingly with every race. I think it's likely that the numbers that we see in the graph would not be that different given this. Perhaps Senna would still be ahead of Schumacher, but I don't think it's safe to say that he would be ahead of Hamilton.
@@helltormentor81 of course he wouldn't, lewis got like 20 races a season with a top notch car
@@helltormentor81 Senna in the FW16B - FW-19 would have been unstoppable. And he could have gone anywhere, even gone back to McLaren or joined Ferrari. He polled the FW16 in the 3 rounds he raced it and it shouldn't have happened at Brazil or Aida.
MS was already destroying Senna in early 94
@@GabrielFegm, there's a reason for everything. In any case, poles are exactly and only that: poles; they're not races nor championships. In this latter aspect, Schumacher is way ahead of Senna and Hamilton is even better than the two.
Damn Senna nearly had double the amount of poles than anyone for a while
And within 6 years dammmmmm
At least he died with a pole.
Edit: A bit like a terrorist, they go out with a bang so to speak.
Senna had 2x less races then Schumacher but schumi only beat him by 3
That really shows something
@@judenjeru5081 shows that schumacher was much better at racing then qualy... having alot more wins then poles, while senna had more poles then wins :P
@@NoNameLeft1500 Senna many times led a slower car to pole, but in a race day is hard to keep faster cars behind.
Os números não mentem, a ascensão de Senna é extraordinária.
O que o Senna fez em 10 anos o Schumacher levou 20! Era brilhante o nosso eterno herói!!!
Pura verdade, Sena entrou na Formula 1 em 1983, e morreu em 1994, em 9 anos fez muito mais rapido, o que o alemão levou o dobro do tempo.
@@entretenimento3994 com 34 anos schumacher tinha o dobro de vitorias e e titulos.. aham.
UAI, mas com 10 anos Shumacher Tinha 53 vitorias contra 41 que é mais importante que pole.
@@orangemechanical8851 não e considerando idade,e sim os primeiros 161 gps,o Senna marcou a pole 65 no gp 161,o Shumi marcou sua pole 65 no seu gp 243 mais ou menos.
@@orangemechanical8851 Shumacher tem 23% d pole narcadas en seus 307 gps,Senna tem 40% e chegou a ter 50.
Senna had 65 poles. His first years in F1 were with a slow car.unfortunately with his death we only enjoy 10 years of him in F1. Imagine if he had race 5-7 more years he could have likely 90- 100 poles. One can only imagine. After Williams he was supposedly rumor to go to Ferrari in 97.
Probably 90+ Poles and 2-3 more WDC's under his belt considering Hill and Villenueve were able to win in the car in subsequent years. I still think he comes back and wins in '94 had he not passed away. Truly one of the greats.
first year with a shit car and 3 years with a middle car(lotus) only 4 years with the best car of the grid.
@JT
"....so start in pole and finish in pole, but Senna usually fought his way to victory...."
C'mon man. Senna won 29 races when he was on pole! Only twelve when he was not. I'm not saying he wasn't great or that he didn't have to fight for the wins. But what you said simply isn't true.
@@no5150bozos, many of the statements made about Senna are clearly exaggerated. Like you, I never mean to say he is not a legend, but much of what is said about him is exaggerated or even false. For some reason, his fans just refuse to accept numbers, and even make unsustainable justifications for when he doesn't top a list.
Se Senna não tivesse morrido tão cedo pelo menos uns três títulos e mais umas 40 ou 50 poles do Schumacher teriam sido marcadas por ele... simples assim
Ayrton Senna ♥️🙌
Comecei a vibrar aqui quando Senna desparou na frente
Senna, o piloto mais rápido que já vi correr.. seja no seco ou no molhado, com carro bom ou carro ruim, fazia a diferença... Valeu Senna, adeus campeão!
O limite era o morte
Se Senna tivesse corrido mais 3 temporadas, dificilmente alguém o alcançaria. O cara era mestre das qualificações. Hakkinen também era foda nos treinos
Já calculamos e projetamos várias vezes isso em fóruns e, na pior das hipóteses, com Senna ficando na Williams em 94 e 95 e indo terminar a carreira em apenas dois anos na Ferrari(96 e 97), seriam entre 110 e 115 poles. Na melhor das hipóteses(4 anos de Williams até 97, pegando em 96 e 97 dois supercarros) e mais dois de Ferrari(98 e 99, com esse último já o melhor carro que quase venceu com Irvine), seria um massacre com mais de 150 poles.
Man... I wish I was born in Ayrton Senna's days. I didn't know how big he was in F1. I mean, Hamilton, Vettel, Schumacher and Fernando Alonzo are all great, but they don't seem to be as impressive as Senna.
They are as good as Senna ... I was around to see Senna and he was my favourite driver ... in fact Hamilton and Michael are better.... Hamilton is actually much better - the best we have seen so far - he is fast like Senna and smart like Prost.
I also was around when Senna was there. Except in Brazil, I would say that in the rest of the world at that time he was not more popular (for practical matters) than Schumacher was or Hamilton is right now. His death turned him into the "myth" that he is now. I also think Hamilton is better overall.
Schumacher was equally good if not better overall. Senna was raw speed, and it looks like, you like him or not Hamilton is the best. Race craft, raw speed, consistency. Hamilton got everyrthing, he will break every records there is to break. I am a huge Schumacher fan
Eu vi Senna correr várias vezes. Na época eu tinha 12 ou 13 anos de idade. Sempre acompanhava meu pai. Os records existem para serem batidos, porém Senna fez história. Ele é conhecido aqui no Brasil como "chefe".
john cale Hamilton was outclassed by Button & Rosberg - he’s also a massive racist
early 90's you can see alot of same names, definetly the most dominant at the time, Gerhard Berger, Nigel Mansell, Alain Prost & definetly my favorite and best of all time driver, Ayrton motherfucking Senna
And now mercedes 1,2 even schumi was so good he was close to being champ in 2006 brawn and schumi the immortal double
@Leandrinho that's just a lie. Do you know anything at all about F1 car history .... apparently not.
@@markmark5269 what lie? Everybody talks about amazing Senna
Senna moved the goalpost into a different dimension.
Imagine if Ayrton Senna had the equivalent of a Mercedes AMG car for his whole career........................................
Senna was like Messi, an alien in a whole another category. Hamilton/Schumacher is/were like Cristiano Ronaldo: real fucking good sportists, the most dedicated of their generation with incredible will to win and be the best.
I think Prost can join all these!
@guering Absolutely well put!
Actually Senna was both Messi and Ronaldo, he was the most dedicated and talented driver ever, his life was racing.
Airton Senna número 1!!!!Brasil..
First -only SENNA!!!! Second - L.Hamilton, ok!
10:16 Ayrton Senna has left the game :(
F
T_T
Was the end of an era :(
F
F
How can Senna earn a lot of pole position driving a Lotus?
Pure speed
the cars was prepared differently for qualifying and for the race.
@@JonePolvora no, Lotus had a much inferior car, senna was incredibly good, and even with a horrible car he got the poles
In turbo era, they could achieve about 1000HP+ in the qualifying lap. But yes, Senna was an awesome pilot.
because people don't know what it takes to be a racing driver
10:16 this is where the video ends for me.
for me too T - T
My childhood ended that day. I felt that as if a close friend of mine had died.
51 years and still only 4 above Jim clarke, and he only raced 11 races a year.
In the absolute best cars you clown, and from day one of his career. It was an usual Grand Prix if more than 2 or 3 cars even finished on the same lap in those days, sometimes only 2 or 3 cars finished at all. Go check race results from the period and live in a world of reality.
@@markmark5269 Why call him a clown?
Always surprised how fast and good Stirling Moss was, he was primarily a sports car drive, not many years in F1.
Fangio raced even less and achieved 29, both great champions
@@markmark5269 There were only 10 races per year from 1963 thru 1965. The year Clark won his two Championships. His winning percentage, laps lead, and pole positions led Time to name him the best formula one driver in history. I believe there were only six-eight races when Fangio raced. As for Clark driving the best cars that is not true. In 1964 the Lotus broke down with an oil leak with a few laps left costing him another F-1 title which would have been 3 in a row. Surtees won the title in a Ferrari and Graham Hill was no slouch in the BRM. The 1966 and 1967 Lotus were terrible cars For Clark. Hill getting a revamped Lotus in 1968 winning the F-1 title. And remember this Clark was second at Indy in 1963 and won the race in 1965. The only driver to win the F-1 championship and Indy in the same year.
Ayrton is the fastest driver EVER in F1 history.
Agreed
No Bellof was faster than senna
No way to tell. Senna was amazing, yes. But there's too many variables. This video visualization of him racking up the poles is pretty incredible to watch in "real time" though. Damn.
no
Tom Geboers he wasn’t. Ayrton and Bellof had the opportunity to test the same car and Ayrton drove much faster.
İ born 1997 but i realy sad for senna we love you legend u are the best !
Fangio, Hill, Senna, Schumacher, Hamilton whoosh....
You mean clark instead of hill i suppose :)
Whoosh what?? With so many more race ofthe senna and shumacher years
jerome2022 Vettel isn’t doing too bad either. 🤔
Fangio (5), Senna (3), Schumacher (7), Prost(4).
Sheffield University Ranking
Ayrton Senna is 4 times champion, despite the scoundrel Balestre removed him, taking care of his friend tricky Prost. They were so scary of Senna that removed him from races for 6 months, lol.
1 time world champion you mean prost outscored him in 88 and 89 and he cheated his way into his second tite, dude a massive fraud.
Dude had a limited race IQ which is most likely why he died and prost someone with far higher race IQ still lives.
@@messithegoat7178 At that time only best 11 results count for the championship, was the regulation...
Hamilton may have a zillion poles, Senna will be the No.1 FOREVER.
Senna died at the peak, he would eventually have become unbeatable. All he needed were a few more years. Legend.
@Zulqarnayn Nadal Prost and weak reads funny considering his place in the list.
@Zulqarnayn Nadal lmao you are completely clueless and dumb
pure emotion, little fact.. being able to win and survive is what makes a racer great ... Hamilton is number one and deserves to be there. Great racer, great team , smart and humble,
There is only 1 God of F1 and that's Senna. 🇧🇷campeão do mundo🇧🇷
Ayrton Senna the BEST!!!
El mejor piloto de la historia en mi opinión será siempre Senna... Los demás si fueron muy buenos pero siempre tuvieron un coche, equipo y gigantes presupuestos que lo respaldaran... La mejor F1 sería cuando una empresa imparcial fabrique 24 coches iguales y la pole y victoria dependan 100% del piloto...
:) ¡Y Juan Manuel Fangio, el ídolo del ídolo!
Segun veo en este video, Mac Claren (que fue donde triunfó pese a que Proust siempre le piso los talones con el mismo carro) al inicio siempre fue una escudería poderosa, al igual que la Ferrari y ahora al Mercedes en sus eras respectivas y en su corto trayecto Red Bull, estoy empezando a pensar que a Senna se le sobrevalora.
Senna had 65 poles in half the amount of races Schumacher raced, if he lived he would of hit 80/100 pole position mark easily, Senna was a gift to Formula 1
No other driver compares to Senna, such a legend!
Senna o melhor!!
Levou mais de 10 anos para o shumi bater o Senna depois de morto...levou 10 anos para o Hamilton bater o shumi...se o Senna estivesse vivo, Hamilton estaria chegando nele agora pelo ritmo que seguia...
@@Gobbattoo obrigado...a sua resposta completou minha análise...
@@fabioivan288 Resumindo: Senna foi melhor que Schumacher.
A conta mais justa seria dividir o número de poles pelo numero de GPs disputados.
Senna 65 poles em 162 GPs 40,12%
Hamilton 90 poles em 253 GPs 35,57%
Schumacher 68 poles em 308 GPs 22,08%
No final de 2020 a tendência é que o percentual do Hamilton esteja maior.
This just shows:
- the brilliance of Clark, Fangio and especially Senna,
- the level of Mercedes dominance, not seen ever before (incl. Ferrari and RBR eras)
Hamilton already had like 35 poles before the hybrid era even began. Without dominant cars. His teammates at the same time got as many as 6…COMBINED. This just shows the brilliance of Lewis Hamilton. Stop giving credit to Mercedes, Hamilton easily the fastest driver since Senna.
Senna - 65 PP / 10 full season and 3 races /162(161) races ,
Schumacher - 68 PP / 19 season /308 (306) races,
Hamilton - 73 PP / 13 season /250 races,
anyone still has doubts who is the best here?
Ayrton 😢🙏🙏
😭🙏
@@sportlab7545 😭😭😭🇧🇷🏎️🏁🙏
Senna foreve ♥️
😔🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
Ayrton the best ! R.I.P.
F
Interesting to follow the name of René Arnoux, who was always a hot candidate for a pole or fastest lap with the turbo Renault… However they had massive reliability issues. And such he was never relevant for he championship there.
For 1983 however, he moved to Ferrari being third in points!
Jaboile was faster and a better race driver than Arnoux, just a fact. then Prost came along, and the same, faster and better than Arnoux.
It's amazing that Schumacher didn't take a single pole position during Senna's lifetime! Such a shame we never saw this championship battle played out.
Schumi was a rookie and didn't have top-flight car. Just the same way that Senna wasn't "crushing it" until he got with McLaren... 10000% agree that we really missed out on the Senna vs. Schumi rivalry that could have been. I think it would have been more epic than Senna vs. Prost. Schumi was basically Prost version 2.0 anyway...
@@GroovesAndLands Senna with a Lotus did more 10 pole position and his competition (Prost in McLaren and Mansell-Piquet in Williams) so...
Actually Senna didn’t like Schumi because he saw him as the biggest threat and both were super aggressive when it came to defending. It would’ve been more ugly than entertaining. They had already gotten into fights off track though Schumi respected Senna a lot.
Cara incrível, o jin Clark do foi superado na era Senna e o Senna só foi superado porq morreu. A superioridade dele enquanto estava vivo foi surpreendente, olha q em 92 e 93 ele não teve carro para disputar o campeonato contra as Willians
15:59 a wild Maldonado appears
Senna foi o recordista de pole positions por 17 anos seguidos. Inacreditável. Uma lenda da F1.
Senna was the record holder for pole position for 17 years in a row. Unbelievable. An F1 legend.
Como e triste ver esse número do Aírton parar em 65 poles com certeza ele passaria dis 100 tranquilo e incrível a capacidade dele e fantástico
10:16 rip Senna
10:25
@@luc1gnol017 10:16 not 10:25
@@damicow a ok, 10:25 is monza
@@luc1gnol017 yea but senna died at san marino not monza
R4cingL1ne technically he crashed in Imola, Italy. It was just called „San Marino GP“ because there was already an italian grand prix taking place in monza.
Seeing Mika get 26 in 2 years is crazy imagine if he stayed in F1
MIka had 165 entries (1991-2001) which is 3 more than Senna. I don't think he would eventually have more poles than Senna even if he ran for twenty more years.
@@bmcomm1 It's just how things went, in the early 90s the top drivers were Senna, Prost, Mansell, Berger etc...and they held the top seats at Ferrari, Mclaren, Williams, the young guns coming to the sport were relegated to the B and C teams. In 94 you had a vacuum at the top, with Senna's passing away, Prost retiring, and Mansell leaving to IndyCar. Many of these seats were filled by those young guns, Damon Hill, Mika Hakkinen, David Coulthard. Schumacher, like Senna before him was quick from the get go, he was very competitive in the Benetton from his first full season in F1.
Senna still kills it in poles/races no one comes close
I would argue Fangio/Clark. Maybe even Sir Jackie Steward and Sir Stirling Moss
Also, not regarding F1, but in racing in general, Stefan Bellof has to be the fastest driver we never got to see. He beat Senna and mansell in diffrent classes before his fatal accident. But this is ofcourse speculation. I thought I wouldn’t do justice to him to not mention what could have been.
@@nfsrival1499 Stewart no, Moss no Fangio yes. But consider that Fangio's career of 51 grand prix is a smaller sample size than Senna's total pole positions...not taking anything away from Fangio but he had a abnormally very short successful career, no one will ever beat his wins/starts ratio either.
Regarding Bellof yeah sure hard to disagree
No one races death traps in a t shirt, slacks, leather gloves, leather helmet, goggles, and loafers either.
Fangio was boss!
@@1madmaxx80 agree, statistical analysis only goes so far
10:16 San Marino - Imola 😥 R.I.P. AYRTON SENNA ❤🇧🇷
Ayrton did in 10 years what Schumacher and Hamilton did in 15 years with less races per season in less years having the dominant car and never had to profit from team orders in his favor( so Senna's ratio is unbeatable)
Senna's results impressed the most. Considering what opponents he had and how difficult the cars were. Schumacher and Hamilton are no match for him. It's not even worth arguing about. The only one more impressive than Senna is Fangio. Considering that in Fangio's time, every race was someone's last.
We will newer forget you,The LEGEND off racing Ayrton Senna❤️
10:15 RIP SENNA
Like every ranking you do, we could say, "not fair different area 7 race per season vs 22". But here it is different. Senna is THE Boss whatever the area.
That's the easy thing to say. Let's not also forget the massive differences in vehicles for each era.
What would Fangio be able to accomplish in a modern car? How would Schumacher have done in something from the '60s era? Where would Hamilton be if he came about mid '70s? Etc...
We all know Senna would be a monster in any era.
Senna could take as many laps as he wanted for most (all?) of his career. Schumacher had to deal with 5 or 6 different qualifying formats in his, including that stupid "one lap with your race fuel load" one.
Конечно, почти все комментарии о Сенне. Его образ, его магия, его влияние до сих пор не оставляет. Он не просто лучший гонщик. Он недосягаемая Звезда формулы 1.
If our dear Senna had not died, he would probably have reached 150 poly easily!
He is the greatest driver in F1 history, NO driver IS better than SENNA
Everyone has generally a standard promo picture.
Mar Webber is doing a crab impression while jumping.
May 1, 1994. The day that changed F1 history. I saw and feel it until today
this brazilian Senna guy seems really good
I know that it's easier to compare the numbers but it could be interesting doing all this comparison in % by numbers of races of each pilot because nowadays F1 has lot more races than before.
For example: Jim Clark has only 73 races against 255 races from Lewis.
So in 45% of the races JC was the pole, and Senna (for me the best ever) has 40%, probably Hamilton is bellow this avarage.
awesome how far up Rene Arounx climbed....
Fangio was in top 3 for about 40 years, and he is driver from era with less than 10 races in a season. Crazy...
Just tell me who won more monaco, who won in the rain the most, who drove a car almost half of a race with just one gear working, who bit mansell by 14 thousand of a second, who passes 5 driver in less than a quarter of a lap, who came from 20 or so place to win a race! please take your hat off for the best! by the way he just had a good car for few years!
You mean only 1 gear for like 7 laps right? If not you are just wrong.
Senna sempre será o melhor em toda a história......
En mi ignorancia te pregunto porque Sena es el mejor de la historia? ???
@@oliveira1554 Veo que no es capaz de entender una pregunta sencilla, mi pregunta es literal, yo no soy experto en automovilismo, si pregunto es porque no se y tengo ésa duda así que reitero porque Sena es el mejor de la historia?
fangio has 5 formula one championships, michael 7 , vettel and hamilton 5 or 6 , senna was so good , but is hard say who is the best in the whole history
@@gonzalosolar3226 thank you
@@yericduarte9224 senna was the best in history my friend ... we don't talk about titles! but yes who snetou in the car and was the best every time ... do not come with this that who has more titles and the best
Senna, 65 pole positions em sua maioria no câmbio manual. Não existiu e nem existirá outro igual
Senna did it in 10 years. the rest took decades! simply no comparison possible!
Resumindo Ayrton estava tão a frente do seu tempo que seu Record de pole só foi ultrapassado por Schumacher 12 anos após sua morte.
Sem contar o numero de corridas q o alemao teve q fazer pra chegar á marca..
Senna Rise in the first! saludos from USA! #Sennaforever
Até a ultrapassagem do Senna no gráfico foi emocionante!
Mesmo com uma carreira bem mais curta que o Schumi o Ayrton estatisticamente foi bem superior ao Schumacher. Imaginem se tivesse ido para a Ferrari?
@@youtubenaosalvaidentificador Lembre que Schumacher em 94 foi campeão por apenas um ponto de Hill. Senna estava anos luz de Hill. Com certeza Schumacher dificilmente não seria campeã nesse ano e nem nos anos posteriores se Senna estivesse vivo.
*Dificilmente Schumacher seria campeão. Perdeu título até do Hill. 94, 95, 96, 97, etc seria Senna com certeza.
@@youtubenaosalvaidentificador Eu fiz minha análise baseado nos "ses" e conforme a escolha dos pilotos. Senna curtiu 2 ou 3 anos de uma Mclaren de ponta além de ter tido um piloto a altura como parceiro. A saída da Honda em 92 já com a equipe bem desgastada e a troca da Mclaren pela Williams quando esta já não era o carro imbatível. Qto a Bennetton do Schumi muito se fala do carro "adulterado" e basta dar uma googada.
mas Senna não quiz ir para a Ferrari...foi para a Williams por era o melhor carro...Schumacher teve tomates para ir para a Ferrari mesmo sabendo q ia q lutar muito para ser campeão...vocês só falam do Senna porque são brasileiros por isso não são imparciais..e falo nisto vos dizendo q o meu ídolo é brasileiro...Nelson piquet...só não tentem retirar o mérito q o Schumacher teve
@@joaomariocoutodonascimento8231 Nelson Piquet tentou ferrar a vida do Senna na fórmula 1, mas acho q vc n sabia dessa
Even Hamilton and Schumacher agree that Senna was the number one ;)
Is incredible to see Senna growing and growing, again, again and again in the rankings. The limit for Senna bacame his death!!! What a driver, what a man, what a legend!!! - SENNA THE BEST EVER !!!
Schumacher was a monster but it took 20 years to pass Ayrton Senna, doing what Senna did in just 10 years!
Hamilton became Senna's heir in the hearts of all Brazilian fans.
Jim Clark would have been right up there as one of the greatest ever RIP Scottish gentleman
I see Senna looking in the rearview mirror of the car and saying goodbye to the other drivers!!! 👋🏼
mano se o senna nao tivesse morrido ctz que ele ainda estaria em 1° :(
Schumacher war 5 mal mit den roten WM . Da kann Hamilton noch 10 mal WM werden mit Mercedes . Mit Ferrari den Titel zu gewinnen ist was ganz besonderes. Aber für mich war Senna der beste , nicht nur auf der Strecke sonder auch daneben.
Senna the Best
Wirklich, so ist es!
Se Senna estivesse vivo, e correndo mais uns 5 anos, estaria em primeiro lugar desse ranking com certeza!
A really illuminating bit of graphics, you can see Schumacher's motivation ending with taking the record.
Senna era broca ! Já começa que com a lótus, ele já fez uma caralhada de pole , logo na sua segunda temporada com um carro que era bem mais ou menos . Na McLaren foi espancamento ! Senna o que mais fez em menos tempo !
Senna actually knew someone would make this video, he just tried to race on the leader board, frightening genius
Senna morreu a 26 anos e ainda esta em 3° em numeros de polis, era um genio
Senna & Micheal schumacher my all time fav f1 drivers always will be.
É fácil perceber o crescimento descomunal do Hamilton de 2015 pra cá.Mas se levarmos em conta a Relação:
Tempo na categoria/adversário a altura tecnicamente dentro da pista/características e dificuldade das pistas/superioridade técnica do carro.Em números de Pole Senna é Melhor!!!! É tão melhor que até os pilotos admitem!!!
Jesus, 65 poles in 10 years. Imagine if Senna - like Schumacher - also had competitively the strongest car, he would for sure also been 6-8x world champion.
nelso piquet was the best pilot that f1 ever had, but after that crash he lost part of the vision, so, only senna was able to keep winning after that. ironically both are brazillians
Piquet doesn't get mentioned often as one of the greats like Senna, Fangio, Schumi... But he is very, very deserving of it.
Juan Manuel Fangio fell in this stats on 3rd place only in 1989. He was The Master: 29 pole positions and 24 wins in only 51 races.
Too bad Senna check out before his time, as Kodijack said, he popped into the scene with a vengeance...