It shows that no matter how many 'obstacles' you put there, the water that gets through to the end has still same amount of power and speed. Water is such a wild beast to interrupt and to tame.
I wonder if turning a regular rectangular building 45degrees so the corner faces the oncoming water might make it stand a better chance? Tsunami's are insanely forceful so I don't think this would be a total solution, but it would be neat to see a comparison of the resilience of identical weak-structures turned at different angles to the oncoming waves. (Watching the water flow over the roof of the U shaped building gave me this idea. Water just needs direction of where to go.)
I love how I can almost see my house, and I see all my favorite downtown spots to eat out a lunch at, friends work, family businesses, all people I know, to be destroyed in 5 seconds!
why do they not thicken the liquid for these tests? It is supposed to be at scale so the water should be a bit denser to compensate, along with the buildings being built thinner to show reaction to that water. or are they just showing water flow only.?
Not bad modelling. Would have been interesting to see the second wave, as that may be smaller but inland is already lubricated so it has potential to travel further, over the remains of the first wave.
@vietman90210 why not? I mean, look at the relatively low height of the wave and how much it travels "inland". plus the wave is generated by pushing the entire depth of water, which is how tsunamis are formed as compared to surface waves caused by storms..
As I watched, I'm thinking...where do I run, when I hear the tsunami sirens? The leeward side of the big blue building, near the top floor, but away from the windows, looks best.
Great experiment!, A few questions: Why did you put those walls on the sides? Do you think the breach on the wall at 0:30 can affect the observations ??
+José Galaz The walls on the sides are to create a channel where there are no obstructions-to see how far the water would go should there be no objects in the way (a hypothetical scenario, but still good to know).
what scale is this? from shoreline to the most "inland" side of the model, how many miles would that represent... looks like a relatively short distance but to see those smaller waves coming that far in is pretty awesome
Why don't we see the water receding before the initial wave comes in (appears to be still as glass until the initial wave crests)? Is this simulating a certain type of tsunami that might not cause a receding wave? Or is it just not visible because of the scale? Just curious, it's interesting watching the work you guys are doing.
Part of the reason is they're simply pushing the water forward. To truly simulate a tsunami waive the push would have to be upward from the bottom, displacing the water upward and then the water pulling back down as it gains its equilibrium. That entire dynamic would propagate out from the epicenter and then you'd notice a receding shoreline before the first wave.
I grew up in Seaside, and I can see this happening...mostly....I am not an Oceanographer, but I need to point one thing out. Where you had the Necanicum River..how much would the depression of it's channel change what happened to the east side of Seaside?
Aj Maki - The rivers are significant. In 1964, the wave came up the rivers where most of the damage occurred. The Cascade tsunami will come straight in, but will also be concentrated in the rivers.
what is this good for? you cant put this on the same level as an tsunami because if it would strike with such an impact the buildings would be shred to pieces which results in a total different flow afterwards but worth a nice watch - would sleep next to it 10/10
That's because even thou the wave is to scale the buildings are not, at least structurally. If they were accurately to scale they would have been made with thin plaster plates reinforced with copper wires. With that in mind, I'd say that this experiment is good for analyzing the behavior of the wave inland.
the wave propagation on wather seams better scaled than on land. Mutch fast on land, and withou other importants efects, of erosion and transpor oh everything in a tsunami event. I think it's a better simulation of kinds of waves on wather, but it can't simulate the efect on lnad, buts is good for explanation.
For A Video From 2011, The Audio Recording is legit if you we're there at the time of the test. Meanwhile the Other iPhones that are new, Like the New SE, Sounds A Little Bit Degraded, fucking w h y . and most importantly, h o w .
Wow how much were these people paid to come to the conclusion that if a tsunami hits people need to be higher than the water and need building that are designed for that purpose.
Where's the prom wall , where's the turnaround? Where are the where are the bridges over the Nechanicum River? Or how ever you spell it! Where is the estuary ? Shilo Inn? How tall is that 7 storys . Not a very accurate test !
Controversial Hunter - The Turnaround is represented, although not the wall. A model does not need to include every detail. What it needs depends on what the objectives of the experiment are, which are not discussed here. A physical model will never be an accurate representation of a tsunami, because there are effects that don’t scale linearly. That does not mean that a model cannot provide useful information.
Sorry , didn't want to go into why I thought the prom wall might be important to have on the model. But maybe it would be important because there is 5 bridges that take you from the ocean side of town to lets say the residential side, and what 2 that are in escape routes the one on us101 and the one on 12th Avenue, i mean you could count the one on ave U but if you do that , that means there is only 4 on the ocean side . Also Avenue U would take you towards Portland as your escape route but the road is so low that way that during high tide or lots of rain it is at times under a foot of water. So you see maybe the prom wall gives people an extra few moments to get to a legit escape route. Maybe not but that's why I mentioned it.
Has a test ever looked at the rest of that coast , like Gearhart, Canon Beach, Or Warrenton? Now Warrenton would be interesting. I think I heard somewhere that it's like 6 feet or more under sea level.
![어느 날 갑자기 쓰나미가 부산을 덮쳤다 [뭅뭅픽] 해운대 | Haeundae | 설경구 하지원 박중훈 엄정화 이민기 강예원 김인권 송재호 김지영](/img/n.gif)
Should of added a little ship.
Zack Tron definitly☺
overspill teritory the best doc doc indeed😅
Nice boat
I agree
some smol cars to
It shows that no matter how many 'obstacles' you put there, the water that gets through to the end has still same amount of power and speed. Water is such a wild beast to interrupt and to tame.
We just need to slow it down
I can't believe how similar it is to the real thing!
Too similar to the point where it was posted on the Japan Tsunami day
Yeah it almost looks like they recorded a scale model of it
@@Deiftwaser really?wow
I wonder if turning a regular rectangular building 45degrees so the corner faces the oncoming water might make it stand a better chance? Tsunami's are insanely forceful so I don't think this would be a total solution, but it would be neat to see a comparison of the resilience of identical weak-structures turned at different angles to the oncoming waves. (Watching the water flow over the roof of the U shaped building gave me this idea. Water just needs direction of where to go.)
What are the odds, posted on March 11, 2011 :(
JpGaming okay that's weird
JProductions odd, indeed
I know the day the japanese tsunami hit japan
JProductions idk
OMG! The city must've been japan (the props)
So cool how you can barely see the crest of the wave until it reaches the shallows.
optical illusion no way
you should have put some smaller props in it it: Cars, trash cans or lamps and see how that would have reacted
You said “you” like there this was done by one dude in his free time
Is there a model that shows the withdrawal of water before the wave hits?
I love how I can almost see my house, and I see all my favorite downtown spots to eat out a lunch at, friends work, family businesses, all people I know, to be destroyed in 5 seconds!
My beach house got hit noooooo😂
The water took a long time to flow back into the pool. That must be why there's so much brown water amidst tsunami damage.
why do they not thicken the liquid for these tests? It is supposed to be at scale so the water should be a bit denser to compensate, along with the buildings being built thinner to show reaction to that water. or are they just showing water flow only.?
This is the best replica of a tsunami I've ever seen
Not bad modelling. Would have been interesting to see the second wave, as that may be smaller but inland is already lubricated so it has potential to travel further, over the remains of the first wave.
@vietman90210 why not? I mean, look at the relatively low height of the wave and how much it travels "inland". plus the wave is generated by pushing the entire depth of water, which is how tsunamis are formed as compared to surface waves caused by storms..
As I watched, I'm thinking...where do I run, when I hear the tsunami sirens?
The leeward side of the big blue building, near the top floor, but away from the windows, looks best.
Great experiment!, A few questions:
Why did you put those walls on the sides?
Do you think the breach on the wall at 0:30 can affect the observations ??
+José Galaz The walls on the sides are to create a channel where there are no obstructions-to see how far the water would go should there be no objects in the way (a hypothetical scenario, but still good to know).
awesome! I wished I had this at my house!
Me too
Same
Me too
Me too
you wish it happens
How ironic this was posted on March 11 2011 😭😭😭
Facts, that was the same day that the Japanese was hit by the tsunami
are the colors of the house like the red gets damage yellow little damage blue safe idk
what scale is this? from shoreline to the most "inland" side of the model, how many miles would that represent... looks like a relatively short distance but to see those smaller waves coming that far in is pretty awesome
BBrown4 - The model includes only about 1/4 mile in from rhe shore. The hills on the east edge of town are about 1/2 mile in.
@@GH-oi2jf 1:20 scale model of seaside
Why don't we see the water receding before the initial wave comes in (appears to be still as glass until the initial wave crests)? Is this simulating a certain type of tsunami that might not cause a receding wave? Or is it just not visible because of the scale? Just curious, it's interesting watching the work you guys are doing.
Part of the reason is they're simply pushing the water forward. To truly simulate a tsunami waive the push would have to be upward from the bottom, displacing the water upward and then the water pulling back down as it gains its equilibrium. That entire dynamic would propagate out from the epicenter and then you'd notice a receding shoreline before the first wave.
not super typhoon test??
Why the water is not retreating
No one is talking about how this was uploaded on March 11 2011 weird eh?
I grew up in Seaside, and I can see this happening...mostly....I am not an Oceanographer, but I need to point one thing out. Where you had the Necanicum River..how much would the depression of it's channel change what happened to the east side of Seaside?
Aj Maki - The rivers are significant. In 1964, the wave came up the rivers where most of the damage occurred. The Cascade tsunami will come straight in, but will also be concentrated in the rivers.
This is actually really cool.
I actually live 1 block over to the left of the big building.
@goldendexter,
Probably would mess up whatever filters they have in place.
Wow that is so awesome! How can the waves crash
That's so AWESOME! I want one lol.
"Home of the World's Largest Tsunami Wave Basin"? The Pacific Ocean holds that title.
what is this good for?
you cant put this on the same level as an tsunami because if it would strike with such an impact the buildings would be shred to pieces which results in a total different flow afterwards
but worth a nice watch - would sleep next to it 10/10
That's because even thou the wave is to scale the buildings are not, at least structurally. If they were accurately to scale they would have been made with thin plaster plates reinforced with copper wires. With that in mind, I'd say that this experiment is good for analyzing the behavior of the wave inland.
They are testing how much flooding there would be
Cool stuff!
SO a 120 FOOT high wave is going to act like a 12 inch wave?
Albert Evans - It won’t be 120 feet high. It will be 15 to 30 feet.
Aww thats so cool like a mini tsunami!!
Water looks beautiful
This is what makes me anxious about Beach Houses
Did anyone notice this was the same day as the 9.0 in Japan?
Small version its quick wave, but gigantic tsunami like 2004 & 2011 , a bit slow but Deadly wave
CAN YOU CREATE A WAVE 600FT TALL LIKE THE LAST CASCADIA RIDGE TSUNAMI?
JUAN JOHNSON - It’s expected to be about 60 feet in places, 10 to 30 feet in other places.
@@GH-oi2jf could also go up to 85
I was waiting for the "End of the world" Scenario wave.
the wave propagation on wather seams better scaled than on land. Mutch fast on land, and withou other importants efects, of erosion and transpor oh everything in a tsunami event. I think it's a better simulation of kinds of waves on wather, but it can't simulate the efect on lnad, buts is good for explanation.
those sounds sound like full throttle
in palu just like that too
ok so the tsunami is just like the ocean but bigger
You Made This When The Japanese Tsunami Hit
That's terrifying
Illuminati Confirmed 3 letters in "OSU" three sides in a triangle
in san fransisco,california : look out for golden gate bridge!
When the Cascadia Fault ruptures.... (not 'if')
That's very cool not gonna lie
Kids, this man has made the Japanese Tsunami (not to be rude about the people who lost their lives)
No he hasn't.
this reminds of the movie the impossible
also 2011 march 11 and this is a coincidence
I hope that the little ghost are okay...LOL
Now all you need is some Lego mini figures!
satisfying in one video
Wow posted 2 days after i was born :D
so stuff gets wet when tsunamis hit a coastline. i think its worth publishing.. :D
Should've put the Titanic and the Poseidon.
Seaside will be impossible to evacuate when the big one is on the way.
Awesome!!!
I hate you
I lived here for 13 years
Cool
WOW KEREN
me encanto ++++++
March 11 :( fukushima *sigh*
It is so satisfying tho.
sure say that when you live here and there's a 50 50 chance every year there's going to be a tsunami
In a real tidal wave, buildings would be ripped down and debris would be part of the wave.
The water at the shore is suppose to go down when the tsunami approaches this didn't even had that
PikachuNinja193792 - It isn’t necessarily needed. There is no explanation here of what aspect of a tsunami they are studying inthis experiment.
I want one
高低差全く無いじゃん…
Wow
Put cars and more detail into it:D
Shoulve been added a rc boat
Yea
For A Video From 2011, The Audio Recording is legit if you we're there at the time of the test. Meanwhile the Other iPhones that are new, Like the New SE, Sounds A Little Bit Degraded, fucking w h y . and most importantly, h o w .
..........
I live there :D
I was there
I live in Oregon and I can't swim, well fuck me
Wow how much were these people paid to come to the conclusion that if a tsunami hits people need to be higher than the water and need building that are designed for that purpose.
0:24
*Soviet Anthem plays*
what the heck am I watching ??
Sh*t my socks got wet
PS: I compare me to the small tsunami, not actual one.
Hi tusnami
lol, i live in oregon
ROBLO- X I live in Prineville, Oregon
Same, I live in Corvallis
Two tisnomis
but cheek
this would be bad if for real...
cool.... but it's not a tsunami.
this is cool.... but being the 70th comment is better
Caleb Capuli Omfg you sound really annoying
Not the best model the ground isn’t always completely flat add a incline to the ground and it will be much more realistic
Where's the prom wall , where's the turnaround? Where are the where are the bridges over the Nechanicum River? Or how ever you spell it! Where is the estuary ? Shilo Inn? How tall is that 7 storys . Not a very accurate test !
Controversial Hunter - The Turnaround is represented, although not the wall. A model does not need to include every detail. What it needs depends on what the objectives of the experiment are, which are not discussed here. A physical model will never be an accurate representation of a tsunami, because there are effects that don’t scale linearly. That does not mean that a model cannot provide useful information.
Sorry , didn't want to go into why I thought the prom wall might be important to have on the model.
But maybe it would be important because there is 5 bridges that take you from the ocean side of town to lets say the residential side, and what 2 that are in escape routes the one on us101 and the one on 12th Avenue, i mean you could count the one on ave U but if you do that , that means there is only 4 on the ocean side . Also Avenue U would take you towards Portland as your escape route but the road is so low that way that during high tide or lots of rain it is at times under a foot of water. So you see maybe the prom wall gives people an extra few moments to get to a legit escape route. Maybe not but that's why I mentioned it.
Has a test ever looked at the rest of that coast , like Gearhart, Canon Beach, Or Warrenton? Now Warrenton would be interesting.
I think I heard somewhere that it's like 6 feet or more under sea level.
At 0:25 and 0:28 there was the most little amazing tsunami vs toy town!!!!!🤣🤣🤣😁😁😄☺️😂😊🤣😂😀☺️😉😋😜🤗🤓😝😙🤑🤠
xxx
That represents a lot of dead people
Yep
this wave doesnt look like it would, in real life, reach 6mi inland like the one in japan
AlexPham95 - In Seaside, there is no room to go six miles inland.