The print restoration of the original negatives go into the process of DVD and Blu-ray releases. You address how DVDs and Blu-rays are "frivolous, conspicouous technology consumption products", but they're the only real physical access people have to art (everything else is OnDemand, Netflix Instant Play, Hulu, Amazon Rentals etc.).
I disagree. Although presumably fine in it's remastered visual and audio quality - the blu-ray release for "Sierra Madre" has somewhat sub-par special features and generic cover art and "Key Largo" hasn't had a blu-ray transfer yet. I think it's important that Criterion gets these Old Hollywood classics - because like many of the great foreign masterpieces - they don't get the proper physical release.
Anything shot on film is going to look better on blu-ray. Of course The Blair Witch Project looks like crap, it was shot on a crappy video camera. Nosferatu, on the other hand, would look terrific. I don't know why Kino hasn't released a blu-ray. I'm sure it would be a big seller.
Come on, you have to do better than that. Of course she was innocent but that doesn't make Huston a criminal. It was an unfortunate accident, far from premeditated.
It's wonderful to see the genius of Huston at work!
My dad works in this movie :3
As...?
Bloody legend.
This book was devastating. The movie too.
"The Treasure of the Sierra Madre" and "Key Largo" for Criterion!!!
ahí trabajo el gran gabriel figueroa
Giants of cinema.
The print restoration of the original negatives go into the process of DVD and Blu-ray releases. You address how DVDs and Blu-rays are "frivolous, conspicouous technology consumption products", but they're the only real physical access people have to art (everything else is OnDemand, Netflix Instant Play, Hulu, Amazon Rentals etc.).
I disagree. Although presumably fine in it's remastered visual and audio quality - the blu-ray release for "Sierra Madre" has somewhat sub-par special features and generic cover art and "Key Largo" hasn't had a blu-ray transfer yet. I think it's important that Criterion gets these Old Hollywood classics - because like many of the great foreign masterpieces - they don't get the proper physical release.
MG way too new for 1939...Still splendid scene....
No, the jury cleared him.
John Huston.
Huston.
HUSTON.
Come on, Criterion, I'm in High School and I know this.
What are you talking about?
That's right, you have got a problem... Does the saying innocent until proven guilty mean anything to you?
Criterion, we have a problem.
Aw, name calling, how cute! The tried-and-true response of a troll who can't make a valid argument.
that's because his father helped him out of it by calling some big shot producer
That's just speculations. The main thing is - it wasn't deliberate.
It was an accident! Charges weren’t filed against Huston.
Anything shot on film is going to look better on blu-ray. Of course The Blair Witch Project looks like crap, it was shot on a crappy video camera. Nosferatu, on the other hand, would look terrific. I don't know why Kino hasn't released a blu-ray. I'm sure it would be a big seller.
Yes, but it was an accident! He's NOT a murderer. Get it?
That's right, it wasn't deliberate. If it was my sister? Well, it would most likely still not have been deliberate...
He made at least 5 masterpieces. This is not one of them.
Yeah, and you're crazy. Very funny...
No.
Come on, you have to do better than that. Of course she was innocent but that doesn't make Huston a criminal. It was an unfortunate accident, far from premeditated.
I'm surprised you even can spell the word "justice".
Well, he's not a murderer
lol You're crazy.
Huh? What the hell has religion to do with law and legislation? You need to get a grip yourself.
Yes he killed her, but that doesn't make him a murderer. There is a big difference you know.