✅ GET THE 500s: bit.ly/3K6xsAA, bit.ly/3y6S9YU* ✅ *CLICK ❤️THANKS to highlight your question &/or support the channel!* ✅ *If it’s in the video, it’s in the desx ☝️CLICK “SHOW MORE”* ✅ *RULES: Please be respectful. NO OUTSIDE LINKS, URLs, email addresses, etc.* ✅ *QOTD: Can a brand known for budget loudspeakers make a high-end speaker? Should they? What other brands have gone high-end and succeeded?*
I had seen your review several times (as well as some others on youtube) and read several reviews about these Q acoustics. I finally...FINALLY... got a pair of these beauties and have been throughly, emotionally enjoying them for the last 2 weeks! I was coming from a pair of Concept 40 which I also enjoyed tremendously for the last few years... The last year I had been powering them with a Marantz Model 30 and both the Concept 40 and Concept 500 sound simply amazing! I had tried several times to upgrade from the Concept 40. i bought and returned: Tekton Double Impact, Wharfedale Aura 4, Quad Revela 2. the increase in price (to the Concept 40) was not justifiable for their performance! yes, to my ears, that's how honest and wonderful the concept 40 sounds! (in fact, i'm not selling them but moving them to a second listening room) ...Until this big brother came along! The DNA is there, no question, but the depth, micro details, layering of sound, fullness of sound, honesty, spaciousness and emotional impact the Concept 500 offer, are on a league of their own! Thanks so much again for your review. One question that remains would be a comparison of these Concept 500 to other offerings (kind of similar price range) such as the KEF R11 meta, Wharfedale Elysian 4, Focal Kanta 2, Sonus Faber Soneto VIII, Klipsch Heritage Cornwall IV, or the Revel PeformaF328Be... Would be very interesting if you can offer some insight into that...or if any of your subscribers could share their thoughts... thanks!
Incredible job with these reviews, Andrew! Most TH-camrs exagerate with the energy pushed across the screen, but not you! Really soothing and relaxing delivery every step of the way, while also being informative and opinioned. We are really spoiled to get such high-quality production for the price of seeing a 5 second ad. The only negative with this channel is that there's NO CAUTIONS or DISCLAIMERS to warn you that these videos can very easily get you hooked-on to one of the worst addictions (for your wallet): becoming an audiophile. As one of your early followers, I'm really considering rehab.
I owned the 3050's for about 3 years, and even though the i's are supposed to be better, it's apparently only subtle. Still, providing you pay attention to the acoustics of the room (more important than most people realize), with good source equipment, both 3050 models are very very good, especially for the money. The Concept 500's though, just take everything to a whole new level. I did need to place better bass traps and diffusers in the room though. Presumably because, even though the 500's have a lower frequency of 41Hz, my ears tell me the bass goes down far lower. In fact, I have a test record which starts with 20Hz test tones and goes right up to 20KHz. I'm using a Rega P6 with Nagaoka MP500 cartridge going through a Schiit Mani and then through my Naim Uniti Atom, and the 20Hz tone can be felt, while I can hear and feel 30Hz, so I think Q Acoustics may be quoting very conservative figures when it comes to the 500's true frequency response - which is the reason why I had to add some more treatment to my room. So, with the 500's you definitely won't need a subwoofer. The 3050's though, yes, a subwoofer just to cover approximately the 20 to 50Hz region.
@@tbear2327 Thanks Rachael. I absolutely agree with you. I have a QA3060 and QA2070 subwoofer. Oddly enough I have a Rega P3 and Nagaoka MP110 and my Shiit Mani is hopefully being delivered tomorrow!
Q Acoustics speakers are very vintage amplifier-friendly. The 3020is which I have is basically a test drive of the Q Acoustics sound and really love the sound. Do not mind saving up and procuring concept 500s, and getting my Pioneer A-9 amplifier recapped and the potentiometers and switches cleaned up. If you do not listen to music to more than 75 decibels, you might be able to get away with low-wattage tube amplifiers depending on the size of your room.
Great review & some spot on comments. I have had these speakers for just over a year now & have never looked back since. Before I had the B&W 702’s which I found a little bright & on long listening sessions they became fatiguing. Keep up the great work.
I auditioned these at home and agree they are really really nice. They lacked a small amount of attack vs my B&W 804d3's. 804's also handle more power. But I think most people would find the 500's are well into the point of diminishing returns.
i have the Concept 40's, 20's and Concept center with a QA 3070s sub running with the Denon AVR-X4400H and the sound is amazing, Dunkirk on Saturday night was staggeringly good. For the price point i think they far outperform many speakers that are double and even triple their price. They just brought out the Concept 300, they look stunning, not seen any reviews though, hint hint.
Thanks for your input. Thinking of getting the Concept 40s in a 2.1 set up first before adding to it. Would you recommend the Denom Amp you use or is there another model you’d recommend instead? I’m not looking to spend more than £800 on the amp
I own their cheaper 3050! In white. I think pair is $600 and they have 30 day home trial. Fit and finish is better than lot more expensive speakers. Amazing sound as well. Sound matters but also does looks and Q acoustics look amazing in living room.
It's easy to sound very negative here but the 3050 are a very very different speaker (apart from the speaker array) . They're tuned completely differently. Much much softer and 'warmer'. The far cheaper (yet still expensive) concept 50 and 30 actually sound very similar to the 500's though far less capable. The 3000 and 3000i series couldn't be tuned more oppositely. While they're not as 'capable' as a 3050i pair in a large space, the concept 30 are the best value 'high-end' speaker I've come across in my 10 years in retail hifi and they give you a fantastic taste of the tone the whole concept range aims for if you choose to scale up to the larger floor standers or the 00 series
Great review Andrew, I own a pair of Q 3050i's and am very happy with them. They surpassed all my expectations. That said if my budget would have stretched to a pair of Concept 500's I would have signed on the dotted line in a heart beat. More so now after watching your review!
I have a pair of Q 3050s hooked up to my Cambridge audio cxa80. These speakers are extremely well balanced, smooth sounding with full bass. They are very easy to listen to for long periods of time. They are way better than the Paradigm monitor 7s I've had in the past. In terms of bang for buck, ive yet to see them get beat.
I have a pair of these excellent speakers with a Michi x5 integrated and a Meridian 808 v6 cd /pre , chord signature cables and a Rel t7 sub to extend the bottom octave of bass .This system is a giant killer
Hi Martin, I have a pair of 500s paired with a Naim XS3. I have been contemplating a sub to go with them. Looking at a T7x or a T9x. Do you feel like the sub does them a favour? So hard to find someone running these with a sub…
@@sapkan7879Hi I have a t7i set up to fill in the bottom octave below 50hz it works very well . I tried using a 2nd T7 but in my room it was overkill .I bought both 2nd hand in case it didn`t work i will sell the T7 .The T9x will give even lower bass and should work even better using the high level input I also use iso acoustics Gaii2 on the 500s and SVS sub isolators they work a treat !.
Good to hear that Rel compliments the 500s well. I plan on using the high level too but via the speaker terminals due to the placement in my room. God those Gaias cost an arm but I see them on many 500s. Might have to take the dive too…
@@sapkan7879 They are well worth it ,also try the cheaper iso acoustics pucks under your electronics they seem to be as good as the much more pricier oreas . I sold the Meridian and bought a Pro-ject RS 2 transport with the pro-ject Dac box rs 2 and have iso pucks under them £85 for a box of 8 .check the weight though they have to be half way between the high and low figure is best ..Good luck .
Love the "commentary" by Kristi! Great work Andrew, please keep it up. I have enjoyed your channel immensely since I found it several months ago. I miss all of the stereo magazines and stores where we could go and listen to all of the different gear available, then dream about what would be the greatest system to have. I am a product of the receiver wars of the late 70's and early 80's and that is one of the reasons I became a mobile DJ in the 90's. Really was an excuse to by a bunch of different gear from home gear to touring sound equipment. Love the review of these speakers, again keep up the great work that you and Kristi produce!
@@kingtrance6826, I agree I have a lot of friends that have been affected by it, DJ's, event planners, event facilities etc. I quit full time 14 years ago and went to work as a locksmith and wound up buying that business 4 years ago, I was considered an essential business and not affected to bad by it.
@@kingtrance6826 As a wedding photographer by trade, the pandemic has significantly affected people in the event business. This will be the first year in 10 where I will very likely not photograph a single wedding.
Just wanted to say thank you Andrew. It was your's and a couple of others review of the XTC amp. It started me on a journey. Checking out those reviews as I was thinking about purchasing it. I came to your channel to see your's. It was a great sounding review but you caused some curiosity mentioning the Drive Core 2 amps. Well I started checking out what you were saying about them and noticed it was a reasonable buy in on 1002 to taste it. I seen a couple of other reviews that were good on it but felt like some may have been holding back. Finally I decided because they were easy and fast to get I would grab one on Amazon. Needless to say I am impressed. Last Amp I was using was the IotaVX that was pretty neutral. Not nearly as neutral as that Crown though. Not to mention it is very resolving for the price and does not hold my JBL 530s back on sound stage. Have it paired up with Marantz HD DAC-1 a Turntable using that IotaVX as a preamp the JBL 530s and the matching JBL subs. It is a very enjoyable listening experience. So thank you Andrew for putting me on to those I am enjoying the music this set up provides. I am still considering the XTC trying to decide if the improvements will be worth it or when I upgrade going a step or 2 over these. Anyway thank you again. Never be ashamed to talk about these things they are incredible entry points into the hobby. You would have to spend a nice piece of change to get there in the home retail market.
Kristi & Andrew: Thorough and Insightful Review...Always Look Forward to Them! Kristi...I am with You..Love my Vintage 80's Technics Receivers...part nostalgia....part real, warm sound...in my opinion...Thank You All!!!
Another great job, Andrew and Kristi. I kept waiting for a comparison to YOUR reference speakers .... Especially since I think they are the same price.
We love the Heresy IVs and while they are our reference we don't feel the Concept 500 is marketed to same type of customer nor do we feel they are similar enough to warrant a direct comparison. For me personally, I'd rather have the Heresys but that's more of a personal preference rather than one is better than the other (if that makes sense). Thank you so much for watching!
Hi Andrew. You may be able to answer a question for me. Just prior to you reviewing the Concept 500's I bought a pair. My main system is a Rega P6/Ania, Schiit Mani, Cambridge Audio CXU, Cambridge Audio CXA60, and originally, the Q Acoustic 3050's, although now of course, I'm using the Concept 500. To say that I am impressed with them would be an understatement. Even with the CXA60 integrated, they sound very good - certainly in a completely different class to my beloved 3050's. Of course I am going to upgrade my amplifier to something like a Hegel, Naim Uniti Atom, or possibly even a NAD M10 to get the best out of the 500's. Now my question for you Andrew, is "Did you, by chance, try the Concept 500's with your beloved Crown XLS1002?" If so, what were your thoughts of the Crown integration with the 500's? Why do I ask this question? I also have a Crown, although it is the XLS2502. Now, I have tried it using the pre-outs of the CXA60. I won't tell you which I thought was better, i.e. CXA60 or XLS2502, but would be very interested to hear your comments. When you reply, I'll tell you what I thought about the Crown/Concept 500 combination. Regards, Rachael.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews - Thank you for your reply. Please bear in mind that I'm being hyper critical in what I'm about to say. My thoughts of the XLS2502/Concept 500 was a bit mixed. Bass was quick and tight, although lacking a very minor amount of texture. Upper bass could have just a little more body. The midrange was transparent, but again, to my ears at least, lacked the body of the CXA60. What I did like was because the XLS2502 was so transparent in the midrange, there was a sense of almost being able to see (hear) through the midrange mix. Still, I think I like foregoing just a bit of the transparency for the extra body of the CXA60. Because of the extra body of the CXA60 voices had that really nice sense of the performer being in the room, whereas with the XLS2502, voices sounded like they were a little bit further back in the mix - I think this might be what many people might describe as "thin" sounding. I didn't really have much of an issue with upper midrange/lower treble. Here, both amplifiers sounded surprisingly similar. Treble though, just lacked the delicacy of the CXA60. While the decay of, for example, cymbals was still audible with the XLS2502, it was much more evident and more easily discernible with the CXA60. Possibly a lack of top end extension with the XLS2500? Hmmm, maybe. Then there was the issue of clarity in the treble domain, although possibly it was not a lack of clarity, but more a lack of "sweetness" in the top end which the CXA60 has, but is lacking in the XLS2502. The XLS2502 can sound a little brittle as well in the top end and consequently can lack the ultimate clarity in highly detailed mixes. I could go much further in my comparison and describe sound stage and depth. Suffice to say, the CXA60 presents both in a more convincing manner. Still, the Crown XLS2502 is an amazing amplifier for the money. Of course, the CXA60 is not perfect either, but it does present the more enjoyable listen. When all said and done though, what my observations really highlight is the fact that the Concept 500's can very easily pick out differences in the source! I also mentioned in my original comment that I'm thinking of buying a Hegel (H90, H120 or even the H190 if I can extend my budget that far) , Naim Uniti Atom or even the NAD M10, so I'd be very interested as to whether you are going to review the M10. At the moment I'm leaning more towards the Naim with its huge draw card being its excellent streaming facilities. Ultimately though, the Hegel may possess the better sonics to get the most from the Concept 500's. Still, the NAD M10 (and Naim Uniti Atom) offer more convenient streaming facilities as a one-box solution. So, yet another question - when will you be reviewing the M10?
@@tbear2327 I own concept 500 too. I previously matched them with cambridge audio cxa80. The result was so good that there was almost no need to upgrade the amplifier. This is how I was feeling with that combo! Cambridge audio cx series is very value for money In my opinion. Full body sound with good detail.Concept 500 are stunning and seem they do not need very expensive equipment to sound good.
@@gmamou6862 - I'll admit that the CXA series by Cambridge are definitely excellent for the money. Still, I'm now waiting for delivery of a Naim Uniti Atom. I'll report back as to what I think of this amp in comparison with the CXA.
@@tbear2327 Yeap, waiting for your feedback. Now, I own marantz pm ki ruby which creates wider soundstage, excellent sweet tonal balance, delicacy and detail. But I am not sure if it is 4 times better(costs 4 times more) than cxa80... And cxa80 has a little more vivid sound and more bass. In its price range is great.
There’s been some great reviews ( by yourselves) and awards (EISA)associated with the Q Acoustics Concept 500 speakers. However where would they place in today’s market compared with all your latest appraisals of more recent speakers?
They still mention the 50s as one of their all-time favorite. So I'd say these are also very high on the list, just not as good of a value vs 1/2 the cost 50s
At this price range if you’re not listening to the speakers before buying you’re doing yourself a disservice. Everything is good at this level its more a matter of preference.
I was going to buy these about 6 months ago, because I had the Q Acoustic 3050i's, which were superb value for money. But aesthetically I seriously couldn't warm to the silver base on the speakers. The base reminds me of something you might see on a shop display selling sun glasses. Besides that, I know they have consistently got great reviews, including yours here
How good are these compared to Dali Oberon 9 or SVS Ultra towers? I can’t make up my mind. I have Hegel H390 Int. Amp with the Kef LS50 Meta. Looking to upgrade 😊
I have a pair of 500’s and 300’s 😁with I think it’s a 3090ci centre and 2 svs sb2000’s all in piano white but the 500’s and 300’s having rear oak. I use the parasound a52+ to power them.
Hi Andrew Robinson. have a question to you regarding the concept 500. i think to buy those speaker. and i`m not sure which amp is fit to this speaker. i have a feeling the marantz is the perfect match. but streaming is important as for me. and i know the marantz have the 7000n support streaming. but i guess that amp is to weak for this speaker. i also like amp with tone control. so that i can make the sound fit more in my room. i dont want use subwoofer. that is why i would like to have tone control. and generelly warm and round sound and clear. i`m own a primare I35 parisma. but i feel its to nautral. that i need a subwoofer for reach my needs. do you have any tips for what i should look after. many thansk for answer.
Loving your and Kristi’s content, definitely one of my favourite channels. Something I think would be helpful in reviews such as this is a visual representation of the size of the product. For example if you’re reviewing a DAC hold it, reviewing a speaker stand by it (tower) or sit by it (bookshelf) As this review is old I’m going to post the same comment in a more recent review. Thanks 👍
I liked the small 2020i I heard a couple of years back so it's great to hear that their more exclusive brothers are great too. Nice job as ever. Thanks.
I was eagerly waiting for your review of the concept 500. I'm Seriously thinking about going for these towers. It will all depend on the bass, midrange and treble performance. Not sure their bass will be as deep as I'd like with 41 htz, but won't know until I demo them. My room is 16 foot by 12 foot so they may be ok. As for looks they are lovely in black/ Rosewood, however I do wish they had more wood than they have. I love the stands also. Great review once again Andrew. One thing I will say, I would have liked to have seen a front ported design for ease of room placement.
Hi, would you choose the B&W formation duos & hub vs the Q acoustics concept 500 with the Naim Uniti Atom? You praise both :) I have the voice to get both at the same price . Thanks
Love ya Kristi. Oh, and your great too Andrew. Who do I call to get you one of those top three Yamaha integrated amplifiers along with the Luxman top three integrated amplifiers. I love the the vintage meter looks but not many reviews!
Hello Andrew and Kristi. One question. It seem that you have tried the Concept 500 with out spikes, am I correct? If you did, I believe they sound better with them on. Otherwise, they will rock and that could affect the sound quality. I personally use them with Isoacoustics Gaia II feet and they shine with those feet. On the other hand, these speakers are extremely transparent. They show everything the source has to give. Pair them with good high end electronics and they will blow you away, more. I mean this because I have them and I heard them with the Naim Uniti Atom and, eventhough they sounded pretty good, they have much more to show with very good electronics.
Please Andrew.. Review the bookshelf version of this, the Concept 300. The 300 is within reach and suit my room size more. Hope it has same characteristic as the one you review here. I mean, you’ve done it with the Polk. Reviewing both tower and bookshelf. Hope you could treat the 300 the same way 😊
I run Concept 40s with a NAD T778, not exactly budget but works great. My house is pretty full of Q Acoustics stuff, and a Decent xx80 Yamaha AVR will work well.
I am using Marantz KI Rudy to drive the 500 and they sounded wonderful. You really need to double the price to achieve such sonic level, I am not sure how many in the market can generate such tonal balance and soundstage......If only they could improve the finishing of the speakers though......
Not sure if the bridging strap is really needed in a speaker. I get it's an option and a point of difference and may suit some buyers but I would rather a speaker that does the job without additional tweaking. Enjoyed the vid Andrew.
Looking in the same price range and speakers you have reviewed, how would you compare the Concept 500 with the slightly heavier (118) lbs, Polk Audio L800? I’ve only seen videos of them at Marantz PM-10/SA-10 press releases with the late Ken Ishiwata. For the record, I own the PM-10 and SA-10 but paired with different speakers.
It sounded soft, vague with almost no base control. Very mushy. It doesn't seem to like more difficult loads - was not good with the Polk L800s either.
Hello and thanks for the informative review of the Concept 50 and Concept 500. I am going to buy one of the speakers. If I can get the Concept 50 plus a subwoofer for the same price as a Concept 500, which would you recommend? You said the 50 has more mid range clarity than the 500, but does it produce the same sense of body and scale in a room the larger 500 likely does? Does the 50 have the same clarity and sparkle in the highs you said the 500 possess? Thanks, Drew Harty
Someday I want to get a pair of those and power them with a pair of vacuum tube monoblock amps and preamp. The sound would probably be as smooth as gelato and end up being finished with the pursuit of achieving the perfect sound. Have vinyl and a 192KHz 24 bit streaming DAC as my 2 primary sources
I would like to see just a touch of that metal base material up high. Maybe around the the tweeter or in a ring around the woofers. Just to up its visual appeal a bit. Just a Lil, otherwise i like them.
They put chrome rings on the drivers in the 30XXi series. Horses for courses, too showy for me. If the Q logo were chrome though (and moved to either top or bottom) I think would be nice.
Hello Andrew. Very informative and immersive review. On a different note, where did you get your entertainment unit/console? I really like its design. Thank you.
Maybe I missed it but weren’t you going to talk a bit about wattage to connect to the speaker? And what exactly was is that the edge 300 make sound bad?
I used to own a pair of Q Acoustic 3050I speakers. They, were mightily impressive. The mid range was superb, male and female vocals shone, as did guitars, violins Etc. The top end was clear and smooth, but, I would have preferred the top end fractionally brighter. The bass didn’t reach particularly low, but, it made up for it in punch and slam and raw energy. I felt they performed at their best when driven at higher volumes. I also felt they got a bit congested when trying to reproduce crowded musical passages. Unfortunately, I could not listen to them for extended lengths of time as they gave me listener fatigue and I have absolutely no idea why that should happen. When I made the decision to update and upgrade my entire system. I thought the natural progression would be to audition the Concept 500. I listened to them in 4 different shops, with 4 different amps. I was so, so disappointed. They just sounded, well, flat! Perhaps my expectations were too high? I’d watched so many rave and positive reviews. No one had a negative to report. I auditioned them along with the likes of Spender, B&W, Kef, ATC, Monitor Audio, Elac and others, and most of those impressed me far more than the Concept 500. Interestingly enough, most dealers tried to steer me away from my final speakers, which now stand tall and proud in my living room and are sounding great.
Well, I have them and they are anything but flat. One of their strongest points is imaging and layering. If you set them up properly and you pair them with good electronics, they throw an "incredible" 3D image. I've heard three hi-end systems costing more than 100k and I was so so disappointed. I learned then that positioning, setting and voicing are "critial" in a good sounding system. Those systems didn't sound bad, but neither great, considering their price tag. In fact, one of them was awful. But I know it should be mostly due to bad setting and voicing. It takes a LOT of work, time, effort and money to set up properly a system and dealers don't have the time, resources or knowledge sometimes to do it right. You can get a budget system to sound much better than a much expensive one if you learn how to do it.
@@howardskeivys4184well, its kind an open statement, but I would say any electronic that can make them came alive. I've heard them with four different amplifiers, the Naim Uniti Atom, a EL34 valve Yaqin amp, a good class D amp and the Line Magnetic LM-508IA, a 300B and 805 valve amp. The last one is, by far, the best as it is a monster: dynamic, sweet, detailed, etc. But its also the more expensive (about 5 grand in the US). As the Concept 500 are so transparent, they will show you any change you make in your system, as any other good high end speaker, and they need an amp with grip to get the best out of them. As Andrew, I didnt like them paired with a Class D amp, eventhough it was a very good one. Also, if you better your source, they will let you know it for sure. I upgraded and perfectioned my digital rig and it made also a BIG difference. Sorry for my english, its not my native language.
@@howardskeivys4184 I would add that what I experienced with the C500 is that every time I thought the couldnt sound better, I upgraded the electronics and they improved. So I believe the electronic was holding them down. Its like they didnt had a limit.
Kristi: the NAD M10 feels like a torn on our sides. So lets all go to NAD social media pages and bombard them with requests for a review sample. Nahh, I say more, lets ask them for a unit we can do a sweepstakes right here. Lets stop asking Andrew and Kristi, lets take it to NAD. On the way there lets also ask for one of the lower cost integrated amps, they are quite nice. Also.their vintage pieces are cool too.
You HAD to go and like them! My aspirational speakers for a dedicated system. I think they'd get on really well with my Yamaha A-S1100 and arcam burr brown DAC! I'd love gunmetal chrome in the base. Re: BASS they might do well with DSP e.g. the dual core from dspeaker? Any chance to review that product? Also wonder what further decoupling may acheive with these, my Gaia three isoacoustic feet transformed and effectively upgraded my Dali Ikon 6MkIIs but most forum nerds won't/don't believe you.
Hi Andrew :) , I’m typically new to the audio section . But right now I have the harman kardan studio 3 and it’s starting to go bad . What do you recommend for less then 300 . I just listen to pop music , so I was hoping you can recommend me something . Very high quality video btw ;)
I'm not really familiar with the HK studio 3 but if you are looking to replace your bluetooth speaker, try this amzn.to/2YMpIhi - it's very good and is right now on sale and under $300.
The day u'll set up a Samsung-HK sound bar is the day u will migrate from small gadgets. U might need about $1000 or less or even much more less to buy one and set your living room to realistic and addictive sound
I prefer sealed to ported in that instance, just because (and not with the Q) but with some speakers, over time, that plug can wriggle loose and fall out.
Ok, now people when you listen to this review just don't listen for the words, "They're good" Mr. Robinson wouldn't waste his time if they weren't good. listen to how he describes their sound. He 's telling us they sound warm and smooth. He's telling us they sound good with almost any kind of music. That's the kind of sound I like BUT if you like a more analytic sound like you get from B&W or KEF you may not like them. You gotta pay attention to the details of a review.
@@KristiWright It takes a while to do it. With someone like Mr. Robinson, you have to assume he already likes the gear otherwise he wouldn't bother to review it. Now it's up to us to pay attention to the details of what he's saying about it. And you also have to be aware of your own personal quirks and taste.
God they are nice looking. I have the 3050is and some Concept 20’s which are so good. They punch way way above their weight for the price, especially when paired with the right amp. You are going to need some amp for these but these are aimed at people that can afford that amp. Saying that I run mine off Yamaha RN 803 and 602 receivers and the sound is sublime 🤔
Great review. I sold my KEF LS50W and now looking for an upgrade. Would u say the 500s with the Naim is better set up for turntable ans tidal streaming vs the B&W formation Duo and hub? In Romania nearly the same price for both set ups . You praised the B&W as well ;) thanks a lot for your feedback. Cheers
Hi , i have just purchased the rotel a11 tribute integrated amplifier, and i would like to know what speakers you would pair it with. I know this is very subjective but i would like to know you thoughs? Thanks Ron
Andrew, I know this may be a bit 'off topic', but I wanted to let you know that I really liked the artwork you have on your big screen in the background, it really looks like a piece of framed art! ALSO, I am wondering if that is an 'eye canvas' product on the wall (O: Thanks for another great presentation !
@@andrewrobinsonreviews The dome itself isn't centered (centred) or placed precisely in the middle. See 6:35. I watched it again and it isn't the lens.
Hi Andrew, I just ordered the Concept 500 and now contemplating to replace my MF M5si amplifier with (a) MF M8xi, (b) MF M8 pre and power amp or (c) Hegel H590. Just wondering if you have any advice on this in particular whether I should consider pre and power instead of going for integrated amp.
Why not pair your M5si to the Concept 500s before you make any upgrades? Not to say there wouldn't be improvements with the M8xi, but if you are doing it for power, I think you'll be just fine with the M5si.
@@andrewrobinsonreviewsHi Andrew, thanks for your comments. I just ordered the Mcintosh MC 462. I will use my M5si as pre for now. Will then consider getting a C2700 early next year. Prior to ordering the MC462, I had listened to the MA12000 (acting as a pre as the store did not have the c2700) with the MC462. I simply love the combination as compared to the integrated amp MA12000 or MA9500 on their own. I hope it works well with the M5si for now although M5 does not have a xlr output.
@@leslie-1127 do you still run the Concept 500’s? How has your experience with the Macintosh gear been with them since you made this comment 2 years ago? Curious as to your impression now of the MA12000 with them as that has been a dream amp to manny including myself.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews I looked on each of your link and none of them had your media shelve/tv stand in it, can you give me the info for this? it wasn't a part of the review but it really complement your speaker and tv set up very well.
Great video Andrew, thank you! I have them and they are incredible speakers for the money. I you pair them with "very" good electronics and you take care of the AC quality and room acoustics, you can have a world class high end system at a fraction of the cost. Ive heard three systems costing more than 100k and mine, for my taste, with the Concept 500 sounds way way better. To have in a short list if your goal is to build a high end system at "reasonable" price.
Totally agree. Having heard focal utopia with devialet which cost way more than q acoustics and marantz ruby used to own and liked my gear more. To be honest maybe it is also a matter of habit and that we are accustomed to the sound we own.Anyway, they are exceptional speakers for the money if paired with the right electronics.
Thanks Andrew, great review. I own some QA Concept 500 since 3 months ago. Now I’m looking for a matching integrated amplifier for them. Currently using a Moon 600i, but I miss the foot tapping factor, freshness, liveness and more bass weight. All my sources are digital, being my modded Mac mini with JRiver the main source. Do you thing the Technics SU g700 will do the trick, and take full advantage of Concept 500 capabilities? I don’t have the chance to demo this pairing, but I’m intrigued about the technics potential and very good reviews. Thanks in advance!!!
Buy the Atom. Yes, only 40 Watts, but then it is Naim watts we are taking about here. :) The combination of Atom Ant/Concept 500 really is a marriage made in heaven.
I would say if you have a chance demo your speakers with any of the Pathos Acoustics amplifiers. Currently I'm using the Pathos Classic one MKIII and couldn't be happier. Believe me you wont be able to take off the smile from your face every time you listen to your favorite music :)
Hristijan Curukoski , thanks for your suggestion. In fact one of the options I was looking is the Pathos Logos Mk2. It also could be the one you have. I’ll try them and report.
Great review Andrew...I may just be sold on these and I actually like the base on them. We also have dogs so I’ll get back to you on the potential change of heart after I’m scooping hair and grunt out of them!! 😂😎 Stay Safe and keep well my friend 👍
A great review. I agree with regards to the grilles- they are ugly. The feet are a strange feature and as a fellow dog owner the first thing I thought of was the hairs are gonna collect in that trap! Glad I watched this review as I'm considering pairing them with Marantz PM10 Amp and SA10 SACD Player- as suggested by the main man at Marantz himself. I'm almost 99% sold on them.
Yeah, I think that says a lot about the speakers when Ken Ishiwata is praising them so highly. I felt it was a review of the speaker, not the PM10 or SA10. The white version with wood is nice looking.
Yes, many. I was present at Emotiva when they were being developed. I likely will not review them on this channel as a result, but if you want my opinion on them, they're good. I don't care for their look, but that wasn't my call, but sound-wise, they're great value for money and just plain good loudspeakers in general. Their subwoofers are especially good IMHO.
Great review 👏 Please if you are able to, check and review the Neat Acoustics speakers as well, I would love your honest review on them ( Ministra model in particular)
If you get a chance one day I would love to see you do a review and thoughts on the Wharfedale 4.4 tower speakers or the 4.2 bookshelves. I purchased the 4.2s and they have so impressed me with their build quality and sound. If you get a chance check them out.
I think a company should build the best they can. The high end will follow. Of course within their desogm is a price segment but build your best. This review is proof considering the company you are placing them in. K.E.F. went the opposite direction but that is more an effect of them changing ownership/ management. Exelant review!
Hi Jack - IMO, for a newer company like Q Acoustics NOT to build something like this would be a missed opportunity. Do I see them expanding this line? Not likely (although I'd love to see it), nor do I think they will abandon their budget products. With respect to KEF, the strategy to go entry level has arguably made the company more successful than it ever has been. In conclusion, whether you're high end or entry level, manufacturers tend to want to move to markets where they're unknown.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews agreed and a truism for a company wanting to expand into new markets. I guess I was disappointed in K.E.F... And that is on me.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews thanks. I really appreciate your reviews... they , to me, seem to be very thoughtful, and not done in haste. I recently wrote to Paradigm on wether my Model 40n would drive their foundation 100f with the built in sub. they said it would...... but not optimally. I'm sure you understand the frustration of someone in east bug-fkuc ny cant get to hear anything in person, that your reviews really help... thanks again.
These have dropped in price recently in Australia due to change in distributor. At less than $5K AUD they are now a very tempting prospect. I need to find somewhere I can audition them with my PrimaLuna Dialogue HP integrated.
Yep, I just bought a pair for $4899 from CHT. A genuine bargain - they sound absolutely brilliant. Just buy them and upgrade the source if necessary. They are that good!
Hello Andrew. I have a big problem, I can buy Q accoustic concept 500 at a very good price. But as you wrote about Yamaha as300 that the speakers sound bad. They also do not have Synergy with Yamaha as2200. So they sound bad. I also have Denon pma2020 and Rotel ra1572 but Yamaha as2200 is my new purchase plays well with Heco Revolution7. And change to Concept 500 to make it sound worse what do you think???
✅ GET THE 500s: bit.ly/3K6xsAA, bit.ly/3y6S9YU*
✅ *CLICK ❤️THANKS to highlight your question &/or support the channel!*
✅ *If it’s in the video, it’s in the desx ☝️CLICK “SHOW MORE”*
✅ *RULES: Please be respectful. NO OUTSIDE LINKS, URLs, email addresses, etc.*
✅ *QOTD: Can a brand known for budget loudspeakers make a high-end speaker? Should they? What other brands have gone high-end and succeeded?*
B&W Matrix 801 Series 3
@AudioJunkabus a classic, for sure! Thanks for watching!
@Randy Sounds nice! I had a BP-based home theater a while back. It slammed!
So, we shouldn't expect a NAD M10 review in the near future?? Hehehe
ELAC have manufactured very impressive budget (under $300.00 pair) loudspeakers, but they also make impressive "high end" speakers.
I love how honest and transparent you are about your likes and dislikes on reviews. It really makes for a good review
I had seen your review several times (as well as some others on youtube) and read several reviews about these Q acoustics. I finally...FINALLY... got a pair of these beauties and have been throughly, emotionally enjoying them for the last 2 weeks! I was coming from a pair of Concept 40 which I also enjoyed tremendously for the last few years... The last year I had been powering them with a Marantz Model 30 and both the Concept 40 and Concept 500 sound simply amazing! I had tried several times to upgrade from the Concept 40. i bought and returned: Tekton Double Impact, Wharfedale Aura 4, Quad Revela 2. the increase in price (to the Concept 40) was not justifiable for their performance! yes, to my ears, that's how honest and wonderful the concept 40 sounds! (in fact, i'm not selling them but moving them to a second listening room) ...Until this big brother came along! The DNA is there, no question, but the depth, micro details, layering of sound, fullness of sound, honesty, spaciousness and emotional impact the Concept 500 offer, are on a league of their own! Thanks so much again for your review. One question that remains would be a comparison of these Concept 500 to other offerings (kind of similar price range) such as the KEF R11 meta, Wharfedale Elysian 4, Focal Kanta 2, Sonus Faber Soneto VIII, Klipsch Heritage Cornwall IV, or the Revel PeformaF328Be... Would be very interesting if you can offer some insight into that...or if any of your subscribers could share their thoughts... thanks!
Incredible job with these reviews, Andrew! Most TH-camrs exagerate with the energy pushed across the screen, but not you! Really soothing and relaxing delivery every step of the way, while also being informative and opinioned. We are really spoiled to get such high-quality production for the price of seeing a 5 second ad.
The only negative with this channel is that there's NO CAUTIONS or DISCLAIMERS to warn you that these videos can very easily get you hooked-on to one of the worst addictions (for your wallet): becoming an audiophile. As one of your early followers, I'm really considering rehab.
Kristi, thank you for all the support and great information.
I have the QA 3050i's and I want these Concept 500s. They look great....although the look is just part of this!
I owned the 3050's for about 3 years, and even though the i's are supposed to be better, it's apparently only subtle. Still, providing you pay attention to the acoustics of the room (more important than most people realize), with good source equipment, both 3050 models are very very good, especially for the money. The Concept 500's though, just take everything to a whole new level. I did need to place better bass traps and diffusers in the room though. Presumably because, even though the 500's have a lower frequency of 41Hz, my ears tell me the bass goes down far lower. In fact, I have a test record which starts with 20Hz test tones and goes right up to 20KHz. I'm using a Rega P6 with Nagaoka MP500 cartridge going through a Schiit Mani and then through my Naim Uniti Atom, and the 20Hz tone can be felt, while I can hear and feel 30Hz, so I think Q Acoustics may be quoting very conservative figures when it comes to the 500's true frequency response - which is the reason why I had to add some more treatment to my room. So, with the 500's you definitely won't need a subwoofer. The 3050's though, yes, a subwoofer just to cover approximately the 20 to 50Hz region.
@@tbear2327 Thanks Rachael. I absolutely agree with you. I have a QA3060 and QA2070 subwoofer. Oddly enough I have a Rega P3 and Nagaoka MP110 and my Shiit Mani is hopefully being delivered tomorrow!
Q Acoustics speakers are very vintage amplifier-friendly. The 3020is which I have is basically a test drive of the Q Acoustics sound and really love the sound. Do not mind saving up and procuring concept 500s, and getting my Pioneer A-9 amplifier recapped and the potentiometers and switches cleaned up. If you do not listen to music to more than 75 decibels, you might be able to get away with low-wattage tube amplifiers depending on the size of your room.
Great review & some spot on comments. I have had these speakers for just over a year now & have never looked back since. Before I had the B&W 702’s which I found a little bright & on long listening sessions they became fatiguing. Keep up the great work.
Thank you for watching, Mark. Thanks for sharing your experience with them.
I auditioned these at home and agree they are really really nice. They lacked a small amount of attack vs my B&W 804d3's. 804's also handle more power. But I think most people would find the 500's are well into the point of diminishing returns.
i have the Concept 40's, 20's and Concept center with a QA 3070s sub running with the Denon AVR-X4400H and the sound is amazing, Dunkirk on Saturday night was staggeringly good. For the price point i think they far outperform many speakers that are double and even triple their price. They just brought out the Concept 300, they look stunning, not seen any reviews though, hint hint.
Thanks for your input. Thinking of getting the Concept 40s in a 2.1 set up first before adding to it. Would you recommend the Denom Amp you use or is there another model you’d recommend instead? I’m not looking to spend more than £800 on the amp
I own their cheaper 3050! In white. I think pair is $600 and they have 30 day home trial. Fit and finish is better than lot more expensive speakers. Amazing sound as well. Sound matters but also does looks and Q acoustics look amazing in living room.
It's easy to sound very negative here but the 3050 are a very very different speaker (apart from the speaker array) . They're tuned completely differently. Much much softer and 'warmer'. The far cheaper (yet still expensive) concept 50 and 30 actually sound very similar to the 500's though far less capable. The 3000 and 3000i series couldn't be tuned more oppositely.
While they're not as 'capable' as a 3050i pair in a large space, the concept 30 are the best value 'high-end' speaker I've come across in my 10 years in retail hifi and they give you a fantastic taste of the tone the whole concept range aims for if you choose to scale up to the larger floor standers or the 00 series
Great review Andrew, I own a pair of Q 3050i's and am very happy with them. They surpassed all my expectations. That said if my budget would have stretched to a pair of Concept 500's I would have signed on the dotted line in a heart beat. More so now after watching your review!
I have a pair of Q 3050s hooked up to my Cambridge audio cxa80. These speakers are extremely well balanced, smooth sounding with full bass. They are very easy to listen to for long periods of time. They are way better than the Paradigm monitor 7s I've had in the past. In terms of bang for buck, ive yet to see them get beat.
I have a pair of these excellent speakers with a Michi x5 integrated and a Meridian 808 v6 cd /pre , chord signature cables and a Rel t7 sub to extend the bottom octave of bass .This system is a giant killer
Hi Martin, I have a pair of 500s paired with a Naim XS3. I have been contemplating a sub to go with them. Looking at a T7x or a T9x. Do you feel like the sub does them a favour? So hard to find someone running these with a sub…
@@sapkan7879Hi I have a t7i set up to fill in the bottom octave below 50hz it works very well . I tried using a 2nd T7 but in my room it was overkill .I bought both 2nd hand in case it didn`t work i will sell the T7 .The T9x will give even lower bass and should work even better using the high level input I also use iso acoustics Gaii2 on the 500s and SVS sub isolators they work a treat !.
Good to hear that Rel compliments the 500s well. I plan on using the high level too but via the speaker terminals due to the placement in my room. God those Gaias cost an arm but I see them on many 500s. Might have to take the dive too…
@@sapkan7879 They are well worth it ,also try the cheaper iso acoustics pucks under your electronics they seem to be as good as the much more pricier oreas . I sold the Meridian and bought a Pro-ject RS 2 transport with the pro-ject Dac box rs 2 and have iso pucks under them £85 for a box of 8 .check the weight though they have to be half way between the high and low figure is best ..Good luck .
I heard the concept 300 on the Cambridge audio Edge amp at the high end munich show... for me the best affoardable setup at the show!!
Great review mate, I enjoy your style!
Love the "commentary" by Kristi! Great work Andrew, please keep it up. I have enjoyed your channel immensely since I found it several months ago. I miss all of the stereo magazines and stores where we could go and listen to all of the different gear available, then dream about what would be the greatest system to have. I am a product of the receiver wars of the late 70's and early 80's and that is one of the reasons I became a mobile DJ in the 90's. Really was an excuse to by a bunch of different gear from home gear to touring sound equipment.
Love the review of these speakers, again keep up the great work that you and Kristi produce!
😍 Thank you for sticking around to the end!
Too bad the mobile DJ business tanked when the pandemic hit. Like a lot of businesses it completely evaporated. Will all hope better times return.
@@kingtrance6826, I agree I have a lot of friends that have been affected by it, DJ's, event planners, event facilities etc. I quit full time 14 years ago and went to work as a locksmith and wound up buying that business 4 years ago, I was considered an essential business and not affected to bad by it.
@@kingtrance6826 As a wedding photographer by trade, the pandemic has significantly affected people in the event business. This will be the first year in 10 where I will very likely not photograph a single wedding.
@@KristiWright my heart goes out to you! Wedding Photography will be back sooner than later I hope for you and all of my friends!
Just wanted to say thank you Andrew. It was your's and a couple of others review of the XTC amp. It started me on a journey. Checking out those reviews as I was thinking about purchasing it. I came to your channel to see your's. It was a great sounding review but you caused some curiosity mentioning the Drive Core 2 amps. Well I started checking out what you were saying about them and noticed it was a reasonable buy in on 1002 to taste it. I seen a couple of other reviews that were good on it but felt like some may have been holding back. Finally I decided because they were easy and fast to get I would grab one on Amazon. Needless to say I am impressed. Last Amp I was using was the IotaVX that was pretty neutral. Not nearly as neutral as that Crown though. Not to mention it is very resolving for the price and does not hold my JBL 530s back on sound stage. Have it paired up with Marantz HD DAC-1 a Turntable using that IotaVX as a preamp the JBL 530s and the matching JBL subs. It is a very enjoyable listening experience.
So thank you Andrew for putting me on to those I am enjoying the music this set up provides. I am still considering the XTC trying to decide if the improvements will be worth it or when I upgrade going a step or 2 over these. Anyway thank you again. Never be ashamed to talk about these things they are incredible entry points into the hobby. You would have to spend a nice piece of change to get there in the home retail market.
Kristi & Andrew: Thorough and Insightful Review...Always Look Forward to Them! Kristi...I am with You..Love my Vintage 80's Technics Receivers...part nostalgia....part real, warm sound...in my opinion...Thank You All!!!
❤
@@KristiWright Enjoy Your Sunday!!!
Once again you are kinda making me wish I was in the market for new speakers - - great job!
Thank you kindly!
Another great job, Andrew and Kristi. I kept waiting for a comparison to YOUR reference speakers .... Especially since I think they are the same price.
We love the Heresy IVs and while they are our reference we don't feel the Concept 500 is marketed to same type of customer nor do we feel they are similar enough to warrant a direct comparison. For me personally, I'd rather have the Heresys but that's more of a personal preference rather than one is better than the other (if that makes sense).
Thank you so much for watching!
Hi Andrew. You may be able to answer a question for me. Just prior to you reviewing the Concept 500's I bought a pair. My main system is a Rega P6/Ania, Schiit Mani, Cambridge Audio CXU, Cambridge Audio CXA60, and originally, the Q Acoustic 3050's, although now of course, I'm using the Concept 500. To say that I am impressed with them would be an understatement. Even with the CXA60 integrated, they sound very good - certainly in a completely different class to my beloved 3050's. Of course I am going to upgrade my amplifier to something like a Hegel, Naim Uniti Atom, or possibly even a NAD M10 to get the best out of the 500's.
Now my question for you Andrew, is "Did you, by chance, try the Concept 500's with your beloved Crown XLS1002?" If so, what were your thoughts of the Crown integration with the 500's? Why do I ask this question? I also have a Crown, although it is the XLS2502. Now, I have tried it using the pre-outs of the CXA60. I won't tell you which I thought was better, i.e. CXA60 or XLS2502, but would be very interested to hear your comments. When you reply, I'll tell you what I thought about the Crown/Concept 500 combination.
Regards,
Rachael.
I did briefly and didn’t care for the pairing personally. It was fine enough but just wasn’t my favorite.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews - Thank you for your reply. Please bear in mind that I'm being hyper critical in what I'm about to say. My thoughts of the XLS2502/Concept 500 was a bit mixed. Bass was quick and tight, although lacking a very minor amount of texture. Upper bass could have just a little more body. The midrange was transparent, but again, to my ears at least, lacked the body of the CXA60. What I did like was because the XLS2502 was so transparent in the midrange, there was a sense of almost being able to see (hear) through the midrange mix. Still, I think I like foregoing just a bit of the transparency for the extra body of the CXA60. Because of the extra body of the CXA60 voices had that really nice sense of the performer being in the room, whereas with the XLS2502, voices sounded like they were a little bit further back in the mix - I think this might be what many people might describe as "thin" sounding. I didn't really have much of an issue with upper midrange/lower treble. Here, both amplifiers sounded surprisingly similar. Treble though, just lacked the delicacy of the CXA60. While the decay of, for example, cymbals was still audible with the XLS2502, it was much more evident and more easily discernible with the CXA60. Possibly a lack of top end extension with the XLS2500? Hmmm, maybe. Then there was the issue of clarity in the treble domain, although possibly it was not a lack of clarity, but more a lack of "sweetness" in the top end which the CXA60 has, but is lacking in the XLS2502. The XLS2502 can sound a little brittle as well in the top end and consequently can lack the ultimate clarity in highly detailed mixes.
I could go much further in my comparison and describe sound stage and depth. Suffice to say, the CXA60 presents both in a more convincing manner. Still, the Crown XLS2502 is an amazing amplifier for the money. Of course, the CXA60 is not perfect either, but it does present the more enjoyable listen. When all said and done though, what my observations really highlight is the fact that the Concept 500's can very easily pick out differences in the source!
I also mentioned in my original comment that I'm thinking of buying a Hegel (H90, H120 or even the H190 if I can extend my budget that far) , Naim Uniti Atom or even the NAD M10, so I'd be very interested as to whether you are going to review the M10. At the moment I'm leaning more towards the Naim with its huge draw card being its excellent streaming facilities. Ultimately though, the Hegel may possess the better sonics to get the most from the Concept 500's. Still, the NAD M10 (and Naim Uniti Atom) offer more convenient streaming facilities as a one-box solution. So, yet another question - when will you be reviewing the M10?
@@tbear2327 I own concept 500 too. I previously matched them with cambridge audio cxa80. The result was so good that there was almost no need to upgrade the amplifier. This is how I was feeling with that combo! Cambridge audio cx series is very value for money In my opinion. Full body sound with good detail.Concept 500 are stunning and seem they do not need very expensive equipment to sound good.
@@gmamou6862 - I'll admit that the CXA series by Cambridge are definitely excellent for the money. Still, I'm now waiting for delivery of a Naim Uniti Atom. I'll report back as to what I think of this amp in comparison with the CXA.
@@tbear2327 Yeap, waiting for your feedback. Now, I own marantz pm ki ruby which creates wider soundstage, excellent sweet tonal balance, delicacy and detail. But I am not sure if it is 4 times better(costs 4 times more) than cxa80... And cxa80 has a little more vivid sound and more bass. In its price range is great.
There’s been some great reviews ( by yourselves) and awards (EISA)associated with the Q Acoustics Concept 500 speakers.
However where would they place in today’s market compared with all your latest appraisals of more recent speakers?
They still mention the 50s as one of their all-time favorite. So I'd say these are also very high on the list, just not as good of a value vs 1/2 the cost 50s
At this price range if you’re not listening to the speakers before buying you’re doing yourself a disservice. Everything is good at this level its more a matter of preference.
Great review buddy Ask and see if you can get the Concept 40s
I was going to buy these about 6 months ago, because I had the Q Acoustic 3050i's, which were superb value for money. But aesthetically I seriously couldn't warm to the silver base on the speakers. The base reminds me of something you might see on a shop display selling sun glasses. Besides that, I know they have consistently got great reviews, including yours here
Now that you mention it, I cannot unsee that. Spot on. They're so good though.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews So sorry, you can't unsee that now Andrew. :-)
Nice thorough review. Is there any muddiness in the bass like some reviews of the 3050is have suggested?
Andrew, get your hands on an Ohm Walsh 2000 or Larsen 4.2 speaker. It will change your perceptions of sound
How good are these compared to Dali Oberon 9 or SVS Ultra towers? I can’t make up my mind. I have Hegel H390 Int. Amp with the Kef LS50 Meta. Looking to upgrade 😊
I have a pair of 500’s and 300’s 😁with I think it’s a 3090ci centre and 2 svs sb2000’s all in piano white but the 500’s and 300’s having rear oak. I use the parasound a52+ to power them.
Hi Andrew Robinson. have a question to you regarding the concept 500. i think to buy those speaker. and i`m not sure which amp is fit to this speaker. i have a feeling the marantz is the perfect match. but streaming is important as for me. and i know the marantz have the 7000n support streaming. but i guess that amp is to weak for this speaker. i also like amp with tone control. so that i can make the sound fit more in my room. i dont want use subwoofer. that is why i would like to have tone control. and generelly warm and round sound and clear. i`m own a primare I35 parisma. but i feel its to nautral. that i need a subwoofer for reach my needs. do you have any tips for what i should look after. many thansk for answer.
Loving your and Kristi’s content, definitely one of my favourite channels.
Something I think would be helpful in reviews such as this is a visual representation of the size of the product. For example if you’re reviewing a DAC hold it, reviewing a speaker stand by it (tower) or sit by it (bookshelf)
As this review is old I’m going to post the same comment in a more recent review.
Thanks 👍
I liked the small 2020i I heard a couple of years back so it's great to hear that their more exclusive brothers are great too. Nice job as ever. Thanks.
I was eagerly waiting for your review of the concept 500. I'm Seriously thinking about going for these towers. It will all depend on the bass, midrange and treble performance. Not sure their bass will be as deep as I'd like with 41 htz, but won't know until I demo them. My room is 16 foot by 12 foot so they may be ok. As for looks they are lovely in black/ Rosewood, however I do wish they had more wood than they have. I love the stands also. Great review once again Andrew. One thing I will say, I would have liked to have seen a front ported design for ease of room placement.
Good review of the Concept 500. Could you test the Totem Sky tower or the Totem Signature One or both of them?
Hi, would you choose the B&W formation duos & hub vs the Q acoustics concept 500 with the Naim Uniti Atom? You praise both :) I have the voice to get both at the same price . Thanks
One of the few times you can say something is dead inside, and mean it in a positive way, lol.
😂
Beautiful speakers and nice review!
They are! Thank you for watching!
Love ya Kristi. Oh, and your great too Andrew. Who do I call to get you one of those top three Yamaha integrated amplifiers along with the Luxman top three integrated amplifiers. I love the the vintage meter looks but not many reviews!
😍
Hello Andrew and Kristi.
One question. It seem that you have tried the Concept 500 with out spikes, am I correct?
If you did, I believe they sound better with them on. Otherwise, they will rock and that could affect the sound quality.
I personally use them with Isoacoustics Gaia II feet and they shine with those feet.
On the other hand, these speakers are extremely transparent. They show everything the source has to give. Pair them with good high end electronics and they will blow you away, more. I mean this because I have them and I heard them with the Naim Uniti Atom and, eventhough they sounded pretty good, they have much more to show with very good electronics.
I have been waiting for this, and you didn't disappoint :-)
Keep up the great work Andrew👍🏼
Appreciate you watching, Alex.
Kristi Wright we appreciate the work that goes into your videos 😊 You and Andrew do a fantastic job
@@Lexington365 Thank you, sir!
THANK YOU!!!
Andrew Robinson although you may have cost me £3600 😉👍
Please Andrew.. Review the bookshelf version of this, the Concept 300. The 300 is within reach and suit my room size more. Hope it has same characteristic as the one you review here.
I mean, you’ve done it with the Polk. Reviewing both tower and bookshelf. Hope you could treat the 300 the same way 😊
I have a feeling it will be very close.
How do these compare to the Q Acoustic Concept 40s? What low range AVR would you recommend with them?
I run Concept 40s with a NAD T778, not exactly budget but works great. My house is pretty full of Q Acoustics stuff, and a Decent xx80 Yamaha AVR will work well.
I am using Marantz KI Rudy to drive the 500 and they sounded wonderful. You really need to double the price to achieve such sonic level, I am not sure how many in the market can generate such tonal balance and soundstage......If only they could improve the finishing of the speakers though......
Not sure if the bridging strap is really needed in a speaker. I get it's an option and a point of difference and may suit some buyers but I would rather a speaker that does the job without additional tweaking.
Enjoyed the vid Andrew.
Gorgeous looking speakers. Great job!
Thank you for tuning in this fine Sunday.
Thank you for the review.
Looking in the same price range and speakers you have reviewed, how would you compare the Concept 500 with the slightly heavier (118) lbs, Polk Audio L800? I’ve only seen videos of them at Marantz PM-10/SA-10 press releases with the late Ken Ishiwata. For the record, I own the PM-10 and SA-10 but paired with different speakers.
Hi Andrew, nice review, as always. Just curious about what was wrong with paring it with the A2-300?
It sounded soft, vague with almost no base control. Very mushy. It doesn't seem to like more difficult loads - was not good with the Polk L800s either.
Hello and thanks for the informative review of the Concept 50 and Concept 500. I am going to buy one of the speakers. If I can get the Concept 50 plus a subwoofer for the same price as a Concept 500, which would you recommend? You said the 50 has more mid range clarity than the 500, but does it produce the same sense of body and scale in a room the larger 500 likely does? Does the 50 have the same clarity and sparkle in the highs you said the 500 possess? Thanks, Drew Harty
How does Fluance compare to Yamaha turntable? Looking to purchase Yamaha
Must be good when Ken Ishiwata uses it in the Marantz listening room. Nice review!
I am just reviewing the Concept 300. Pretty nice speakers.
Someday I want to get a pair of those and power them with a pair of vacuum tube monoblock amps and preamp. The sound would probably be as smooth as gelato and end up being finished with the pursuit of achieving the perfect sound. Have vinyl and a 192KHz 24 bit streaming DAC as my 2 primary sources
I would like to see just a touch of that metal base material up high. Maybe around the the tweeter or in a ring around the woofers. Just to up its visual appeal a bit. Just a Lil, otherwise i like them.
I 100% agree with you. It would've helped tremendously!
They put chrome rings on the drivers in the 30XXi series. Horses for courses, too showy for me. If the Q logo were chrome though (and moved to either top or bottom) I think would be nice.
Hello Andrew. Very informative and immersive review. On a different note, where did you get your entertainment unit/console? I really like its design. Thank you.
You'll find that info in the description. Thanks for watching!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews Thank you.
Maybe I missed it but weren’t you going to talk a bit about wattage to connect to the speaker?
And what exactly was is that the edge 300 make sound bad?
Oh btw in your opinion, which one should I consider buying, Elac UB5, Kef Q150 or Klipsch R-51m?
Honestly have not listened to 2 of the 3 listed so I'm afraid I can't help you with this decision.
Andrew Robinson ahhh I get it. Not a problem my friend! Btw nice work on your videos!⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Great review and nice comparisons section towards the end. Thanks
Glad it was helpful!
I used to own a pair of Q Acoustic 3050I speakers. They, were mightily impressive. The mid range was superb, male and female vocals shone, as did guitars, violins Etc. The top end was clear and smooth, but, I would have preferred the top end fractionally brighter. The bass didn’t reach particularly low, but, it made up for it in punch and slam and raw energy. I felt they performed at their best when driven at higher volumes. I also felt they got a bit congested when trying to reproduce crowded musical passages. Unfortunately, I could not listen to them for extended lengths of time as they gave me listener fatigue and I have absolutely no idea why that should happen. When I made the decision to update and upgrade my entire system. I thought the natural progression would be to audition the Concept 500. I listened to them in 4 different shops, with 4 different amps. I was so, so disappointed. They just sounded, well, flat! Perhaps my expectations were too high? I’d watched so many rave and positive reviews. No one had a negative to report. I auditioned them along with the likes of Spender, B&W, Kef, ATC, Monitor Audio, Elac and others, and most of those impressed me far more than the Concept 500. Interestingly enough, most dealers tried to steer me away from my final speakers, which now stand tall and proud in my living room and are sounding great.
SO....what were your final speakers
Well, I have them and they are anything but flat.
One of their strongest points is imaging and layering. If you set them up properly and you pair them with good electronics, they throw an "incredible" 3D image.
I've heard three hi-end systems costing more than 100k and I was so so disappointed. I learned then that positioning, setting and voicing are "critial" in a good sounding system. Those systems didn't sound bad, but neither great, considering their price tag. In fact, one of them was awful. But I know it should be mostly due to bad setting and voicing.
It takes a LOT of work, time, effort and money to set up properly a system and dealers don't have the time, resources or knowledge sometimes to do it right.
You can get a budget system to sound much better than a much expensive one if you learn how to do it.
Pedro Luis Guillemain what in your opinion constitutes ‘good electronics’?
@@howardskeivys4184well, its kind an open statement, but I would say any electronic that can make them came alive.
I've heard them with four different amplifiers, the Naim Uniti Atom, a EL34 valve Yaqin amp, a good class D amp and the Line Magnetic LM-508IA, a 300B and 805 valve amp. The last one is, by far, the best as it is a monster: dynamic, sweet, detailed, etc. But its also the more expensive (about 5 grand in the US).
As the Concept 500 are so transparent, they will show you any change you make in your system, as any other good high end speaker, and they need an amp with grip to get the best out of them.
As Andrew, I didnt like them paired with a Class D amp, eventhough it was a very good one.
Also, if you better your source, they will let you know it for sure.
I upgraded and perfectioned my digital rig and it made also a BIG difference.
Sorry for my english, its not my native language.
@@howardskeivys4184 I would add that what I experienced with the C500 is that every time I thought the couldnt sound better, I upgraded the electronics and they improved.
So I believe the electronic was holding them down. Its like they didnt had a limit.
Kristi: the NAD M10 feels like a torn on our sides. So lets all go to NAD social media pages and bombard them with requests for a review sample. Nahh, I say more, lets ask them for a unit we can do a sweepstakes right here. Lets stop asking Andrew and Kristi, lets take it to NAD. On the way there lets also ask for one of the lower cost integrated amps, they are quite nice. Also.their vintage pieces are cool too.
While you’re at it, holler at KEF, Yamaha, Bang & Olufsen and TCL. 😘
@@KristiWright I was not kidding, tell AR to check his IG for mentions.
Ismael Martinez neither was I. 👍😊
I saw it! 👍
Kristi Wright Yup, I think the Blades would be especially striking in that space.
Thanks for switching up the intro, although it was good it was getting a bit repetitive. And, fantastic review!!
You can thank my Tascam recorder for failing to record the audio to my intro for the change-up. But good to know.
Andrew Robinson ha! I’ve experienced a similar dilemma, recorded a 6 min song and forgot to turn on the cam.
Hey Man, I dig that equipment cabinet in the background. what the brand is it?? I'd like it to hold gear and a 75" TV
Links to it (and everything) are in the description.
You HAD to go and like them! My aspirational speakers for a dedicated system. I think they'd get on really well with my Yamaha A-S1100 and arcam burr brown DAC! I'd love gunmetal chrome in the base. Re: BASS they might do well with DSP e.g. the dual core from dspeaker? Any chance to review that product? Also wonder what further decoupling may acheive with these, my Gaia three isoacoustic feet transformed and effectively upgraded my Dali Ikon 6MkIIs but most forum nerds won't/don't believe you.
Have you reviewed any Fyne Audio loudspeakers?
Great review as there not so much on TH-cam, make me look more thinking to those beasts!
Appreciate you watching!
Hi Andrew :) , I’m typically new to the audio section . But right now I have the harman kardan studio 3 and it’s starting to go bad . What do you recommend for less then 300 . I just listen to pop music , so I was hoping you can recommend me something . Very high quality video btw ;)
I'm not really familiar with the HK studio 3 but if you are looking to replace your bluetooth speaker, try this amzn.to/2YMpIhi - it's very good and is right now on sale and under $300.
The day u'll set up a Samsung-HK sound bar is the day u will migrate from small gadgets. U might need about $1000 or less or even much more less to buy one and set your living room to realistic and addictive sound
For placement w/in 12 inches to the wall, do you recommend a sealed design over ported with the port plug?
I prefer sealed to ported in that instance, just because (and not with the Q) but with some speakers, over time, that plug can wriggle loose and fall out.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews Never good when it falls out.
Ok, now people when you listen to this review just don't listen for the words, "They're good" Mr. Robinson wouldn't waste his time if they weren't good. listen to how he describes their sound. He 's telling us they sound warm and smooth. He's telling us they sound good with almost any kind of music. That's the kind of sound I like BUT if you like a more analytic sound like you get from B&W or KEF you may not like them. You gotta pay attention to the details of a review.
That’s a big ask, Kevin. 😉
@@KristiWright It takes a while to do it. With someone like Mr. Robinson, you have to assume he already likes the gear otherwise he wouldn't bother to review it. Now it's up to us to pay attention to the details of what he's saying about it. And you also have to be aware of your own personal quirks and taste.
Kevin Thomas bless you Kevin with your level headed, open minded way of thinking. You get it.
@@KristiWright THANKS! With speakers and amps its not just a matter of quality, its a matter of them being Sympatico with your own personal taste.
I like the sound, but if I have to plonk the sticker price I want to be able to hear the faintest, most damped tinkle of the triangle.
God they are nice looking. I have the 3050is and some Concept 20’s which are so good. They punch way way above their weight for the price, especially when paired with the right amp. You are going to need some amp for these but these are aimed at people that can afford that amp. Saying that I run mine off Yamaha RN 803 and 602 receivers and the sound is sublime 🤔
Imagine them in bright red, a typical sports coupe color ?
- Yep, they would be gorgeous...
I do think the grey is their drabest colour. The black and burgundy is gorgeous.
Great review. I sold my KEF LS50W and now looking for an upgrade. Would u say the 500s with the Naim is better set up for turntable ans tidal streaming vs the B&W formation Duo and hub? In Romania nearly the same price for both set ups . You praised the B&W as well ;) thanks a lot for your feedback. Cheers
i have those and they are amazing
What finish did you go with?
@@andrewrobinsonreviews all black
For small to mid size home theatre. Do you think these tower speakers would be good without separate subs?
Yes!
Hi , i have just purchased the rotel a11 tribute integrated amplifier, and i would like to know what speakers you would pair it with. I know this is very subjective but i would like to know you thoughs? Thanks Ron
so where would you put this in front of your tv the right side etc
The Q 3050i are only £449 in the UK from Richer Sounds 2023.
Concept 40 are £500 from Peter Tyson last time I checked
I’m loving the sound from my new 3050i
Andrew, I know this may be a bit 'off topic', but I wanted to let you know that I really liked the artwork you have on your big screen in the background, it really looks like a piece of framed art! ALSO, I am wondering if that is an 'eye canvas' product on the wall (O: Thanks for another great presentation !
Just interested in what other speakers are comparable to the Concept 500’s in this price range
Wow, the tweeter isn't very well centered! Or is it lens distortion? See 6:35
Huh?
@@andrewrobinsonreviews The dome itself isn't centered (centred) or placed precisely in the middle. See 6:35. I watched it again and it isn't the lens.
@@cremersalex maybe it's a light effect? The light seems lateral, and it can make those effects, no?
My guess is the camera angle and movement is tricking your eye. I assure you the tweeter is centered.
Just the lighting IME.
Hi Andrew, I just ordered the Concept 500 and now contemplating to replace my MF M5si amplifier with (a) MF M8xi, (b) MF M8 pre and power amp or (c) Hegel H590. Just wondering if you have any advice on this in particular whether I should consider pre and power instead of going for integrated amp.
Why not pair your M5si to the Concept 500s before you make any upgrades? Not to say there wouldn't be improvements with the M8xi, but if you are doing it for power, I think you'll be just fine with the M5si.
@@andrewrobinsonreviewsHi Andrew, thanks for your comments. I just ordered the Mcintosh MC 462. I will use my M5si as pre for now. Will then consider getting a C2700 early next year. Prior to ordering the MC462, I had listened to the MA12000 (acting as a pre as the store did not have the c2700) with the MC462. I simply love the combination as compared to the integrated amp MA12000 or MA9500 on their own. I hope it works well with the M5si for now although M5 does not have a xlr output.
@@leslie-1127 do you still run the Concept 500’s? How has your experience with the Macintosh gear been with them since you made this comment 2 years ago? Curious as to your impression now of the MA12000 with them as that has been a dream amp to manny including myself.
I'm a fan of Q acoustics. I have a pair of BT3s and love them.
What model and brand TV stands / media shelve are you using ? I am about to buy a 77in TV and I think it would look great with this stand.
Everything is linked in the description.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews I looked on each of your link and none of them had your media shelve/tv stand in it, can you give me the info for this? it wasn't a part of the review but it really complement your speaker and tv set up very well.
BDI OCTAVE 8379GFL TV console. Thanks
5:40 what happened to your Fluance RT85?
We still have it but we swap things out from time to time for testing purposes.
@@KristiWright oh. Thanks and stay safe.
They do a standmount as well, the 300's but no, no centre channel.
We're getting the 300s shortly, I have a feeling they're going to represent a real sweet spot for Q.
I'm more excited about those sexy stands coming with the 300s than the speakers themselves.
can the round base be removed (And just use the spikes?)
If this speaker had a Magico or Wilson audio badge on it, these speaker could easily sell for twice the price.
Great video Andrew, thank you!
I have them and they are incredible speakers for the money.
I you pair them with "very" good electronics and you take care of the AC quality and room acoustics, you can have a world class high end system at a fraction of the cost.
Ive heard three systems costing more than 100k and mine, for my taste, with the Concept 500 sounds way way better. To have in a short list if your goal is to build a high end system at "reasonable" price.
Totally agree. Having heard focal utopia with devialet which cost way more than q acoustics and marantz ruby used to own and liked my gear more. To be honest maybe it is also a matter of habit and that we are accustomed to the sound we own.Anyway, they are exceptional speakers for the money if paired with the right electronics.
Thanks Andrew, great review. I own some QA Concept 500 since 3 months ago. Now I’m looking for a matching integrated amplifier for them. Currently using a Moon 600i, but I miss the foot tapping factor, freshness, liveness and more bass weight. All my sources are digital, being my modded Mac mini with JRiver the main source. Do you thing the Technics SU g700 will do the trick, and take full advantage of Concept 500 capabilities? I don’t have the chance to demo this pairing, but I’m intrigued about the technics potential and very good reviews. Thanks in advance!!!
Buy the Atom. Yes, only 40 Watts, but then it is Naim watts we are taking about here. :)
The combination of Atom Ant/Concept 500 really is a marriage made in heaven.
Rachael Warlond, thanks for your response. I will try them.
I would say if you have a chance demo your speakers with any of the Pathos Acoustics amplifiers. Currently I'm using the Pathos Classic one MKIII and couldn't be happier. Believe me you wont be able to take off the smile from your face every time you listen to your favorite music :)
Hristijan Curukoski , thanks for your suggestion. In fact one of the options I was looking is the Pathos Logos Mk2. It also could be the one you have. I’ll try them and report.
@@guffosepulveda7189 Great! Let us know what will be your final choice
Great review Andrew...I may just be sold on these and I actually like the base on them. We also have dogs so I’ll get back to you on the potential change of heart after I’m scooping hair and grunt out of them!! 😂😎 Stay Safe and keep well my friend 👍
A great review. I agree with regards to the grilles- they are ugly. The feet are a strange feature and as a fellow dog owner the first thing I thought of was the hairs are gonna collect in that trap! Glad I watched this review as I'm considering pairing them with Marantz PM10 Amp and SA10 SACD Player- as suggested by the main man at Marantz himself. I'm almost 99% sold on them.
Yeah, I think that says a lot about the speakers when Ken Ishiwata is praising them so highly. I felt it was a review of the speaker, not the PM10 or SA10. The white version with wood is nice looking.
Have you ever tested or listened to Emotiva loudspeakers?
Yes, many. I was present at Emotiva when they were being developed. I likely will not review them on this channel as a result, but if you want my opinion on them, they're good. I don't care for their look, but that wasn't my call, but sound-wise, they're great value for money and just plain good loudspeakers in general. Their subwoofers are especially good IMHO.
Great review 👏 Please if you are able to, check and review the Neat Acoustics speakers as well, I would love your honest review on them ( Ministra model in particular)
If you get a chance one day I would love to see you do a review and thoughts on the Wharfedale 4.4 tower speakers or the 4.2 bookshelves. I purchased the 4.2s and they have so impressed me with their build quality and sound. If you get a chance check them out.
I think a company should build the best they can. The high end will follow. Of course within their desogm is a price segment but build your best. This review is proof considering the company you are placing them in.
K.E.F. went the opposite direction but that is more an effect of them changing ownership/ management.
Exelant review!
Hi Jack - IMO, for a newer company like Q Acoustics NOT to build something like this would be a missed opportunity. Do I see them expanding this line? Not likely (although I'd love to see it), nor do I think they will abandon their budget products. With respect to KEF, the strategy to go entry level has arguably made the company more successful than it ever has been. In conclusion, whether you're high end or entry level, manufacturers tend to want to move to markets where they're unknown.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews agreed and a truism for a company wanting to expand into new markets. I guess I was disappointed in K.E.F... And that is on me.
Greetings.... would your recently reviewed Marantz Model 40n be a good match with these speakers?
While I have not personally tested this combo, I have no reason to believe it would not pair well together.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews thanks. I really appreciate your reviews... they , to me, seem to be very thoughtful, and not done in haste. I recently wrote to Paradigm on wether my Model 40n would drive their foundation 100f with the built in sub. they said it would...... but not optimally. I'm sure you understand the frustration of someone in east bug-fkuc ny cant get to hear anything in person, that your reviews really help... thanks again.
I'd like to hear a review from you on the Tekton 2-10 perfect set or the Double Impact. Also the Ohm Walsh 2000.
Hey Andrew, Surprised I found q acoustic bit dull but hopefully these are good as you described. Any chance to get hands on Golden Ear speakers?
Yes, please.
Another great video.
I appreciate that!
Did you take anything off to have a look inside?
I would like to see the crossover
We did not disassemble this speaker.
These have dropped in price recently in Australia due to change in distributor. At less than $5K AUD they are now a very tempting prospect. I need to find somewhere I can audition them with my PrimaLuna Dialogue HP integrated.
I still see them at 7999 - where are you looking?
Martin Berry Photography Klapp, CHT Solutions, Rio Sound and Vision all have them on sale for $4899.00.
Yep, I just bought a pair for $4899 from CHT. A genuine bargain - they sound absolutely brilliant. Just buy them and upgrade the source if necessary. They are that good!
@@bradway9273 thanks - I need to get out and demo them too- with Naim Nova hopefully
tricky - can't find anywhere that stocks these speakers and naim nova
Hello Andrew. I have a big problem, I can buy Q accoustic concept 500 at a very good price. But as you wrote about Yamaha as300 that the speakers sound bad. They also do not have Synergy with Yamaha as2200. So they sound bad. I also have Denon pma2020 and Rotel ra1572 but Yamaha as2200 is my new purchase plays well with Heco Revolution7. And change to Concept 500 to make it sound worse what do you think???
Please please please review Q acoustics much cheaper 3050i ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Ps. Fantastic review, thank you!
Down the road we will likely take a look at their entry level speakers. Thank you for watching!
3060i coming soon I believe. 3020i successor, 3030i, already here.