ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2020
- Sen. Joni Ernst, R-IA, questions Supreme Court nominee on day three of confirmation hearings. #FoxNews
Subscribe to Fox News! bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: www.foxnewsgo.com/
FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour all-encompassing news service delivering breaking news as well as political and business news. The number one network in cable, FNC has been the most-watched television news channel for 18 consecutive years. According to a 2020 Brand Keys Consumer Loyalty Engagement Index report, FOX News is the top brand in the country for morning and evening news coverage. A 2019 Suffolk University poll named FOX News as the most trusted source for television news or commentary, while a 2019 Brand Keys Emotion Engagement Analysis survey found that FOX News was the most trusted cable news brand. A 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey also found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News was the top-cited outlet. Owned by FOX Corporation, FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape, routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.
Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Special Report with Bret Baier: video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
The Story with Martha Maccallum: video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Tucker Carlson Tonight: video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Hannity: video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
The Ingraham Angle: video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Fox News @ Night: video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Follow Fox News on Facebook: / foxnews
Follow Fox News on Twitter: / foxnews
Follow Fox News on Instagram: / om
Such disrespect for a decent lady. She's not making the Democrats look stupid...they're doing that nicely themselves.
Yes!
You speak facts man
No help required to that end! 🤣🤣🤣
typically.
@Digital Nomad what does that even mean?
She is smarter than any senator there is in the United States
Not surprising
@Zach: I'm an oldie, and my goal was to make it better for women who were to come after me. like Judge Barrett. While I was trying to pave the way for women like her, we were labelled because of feminists like Gloria Steinem. I'm glad I burned my bra for the 'right' reasons.
Excepting Ted Cruz, I would agree.
@Fred Flintstone Ok leftist cultist.
@Fred Flintstone You actually are just repeating an error. Get a life.
She doesn’t belong to the “republicans” or the “democrats”. She is a judge, whose sole job is to apply the law in a way she deems fit.
Exactly but Trump nominated her so they automatically hate her & feel threatened
@@KC1up she's a constitutionalists and Trump nominated her.. Double whammy... God forbid we have another judge that goes by our constitution and not what the dems want...
@@shannonsanders2132 shes an originalist but ya same thing really. You right
@Stephen Fry Go back to China bot.
*Tyler Madison* if she wasn't going to be good for the republicans they wouldn't be forcing the issue to get on during an election year. The republicans stopped President Obama from doing the same thing but it is ok for Trump?
It is not now, nor was it ever, "Justice Ginsburg's Seat" It is the people's seat.
Then why dont the people get a say?
Chaz they do. In 2016 trump said "supreme court vacancies" and the people elected him to fill those seats
@@derekbuck2369 thatd be a valid point if obama were able to appoint that year
@@chazbay9481 at the mid term elections the people showed they didn't approve of Obama's policies by electing a republican senate. It's not complicated.
@@derekbuck2369 bruh he literally already filled two seats and he is filling another seat. Obama only filled two seats in two terms and Trump is trying to fill 3 in a single term. And yall talk about Biden stacking the courts lol
Her name is Amy not Ruth Amy needs to do whats right in Amy's heart and knowledge but most of all Constitutional
allent208 Amen. ✨🇺🇸
What is Amy short for?
@@TheVanillaChapstick appointed many years
@Bob bob well, could be Amelia. But I don't know.
You are correct.
She is smart, humble and over qualified.
She didn't know the protections provided under the first amendment of the constitution... that's the opposite of over qualified...
@Digital Nomad not if that woman is smart and adequate. Same goes to man too. She's a great choice for SCOTUS
Amen 🙏
I just think the judge is hott lol
OMG....I'm a woman and I'm getting sick of hearing about women.
😂
Same. Along with the race card. I mean my ancestors were escaped slaves but you could not tell by looking at me because somewhere along the line somebody was not racist and said I love you what is skin color but color? And that was not to far back either.
are you a woman? i need proof
@KC PMII Wagner
@She’s so Lucky oh. I know it. But it isn't just white people racist against black people. Black people are racist against white people and each other. I have 2 friends that are black that are always saying derogatory things about each others skin tones.
I am just sick of "white" people getting all the blame. It is with every race.
She is not a ginsburg replacement. She is a new justice filling a vacant seat.
And way better than Ginsburg!!
Travis - stop using common sense
Anyone wanting to know why the Founders designed Article III in the manner in which they did need only look at the last four years of SCOTUS nomination processes to see the wisdom in it. It is raw, naked politics right up to the Senate vote to confirm -- because once that justice is seated they no longer have the power to influence outcomes. So be it. The only area in which the Founders left too much uncertainty with regard to the independence of the Judiciary was leaving it up to Congress to establish how many justices are to be seated on the Supreme Court -- which through Democratic rhetoric has been threatened for the past two years directly. I'd rather see that written in stone through a Constitutional amendment, unlikely as it may be, and that would solidify the independence of the Judiciary.
Thank God!!
Ok stop repeating all the top comments, thanks
This seat belongs to the people of America not ginsberg.
The people of America want a delay. Have you seen the polls?
@@1133saginaw the polls are wrong like every 4 years
@@1133saginaw yeah Trumps destroying in the polls TRUMP 2020
@@1133saginaw only on November 3rd will we know the truth
Absolutely
Judge Amy is brilliant! No notes, not books, only her intellect. She's definitely a role model! God bless her for putting up with them!
She doesn't even know the protections provided under the first amendment of the Constitution and she is supposed to uphold it? that's what you call brilliant?
@@tee5738 lol, right...no clue...AYFM? STOP!
@@tee5738 yeah you caught her slipping for once so what? She literally dismantled every other question that came before her (in reference to laws).
@Apophis Max OUCH ! 😂😂😂
@Apophis Max I'm somehow a snowflake, but you're the dumbass that's supporting a Supreme Court judge that doesn't know the first amendment.... sure lol
Judge Barrett is a fine fit for the Supreme Court. Nothing inadequate about her.
@Harlan Venden She has beliefs. What's wrong with that? Please tell me. We have religious freedom in the United States, in case you haven't heard.
@@katierose6201 Or because she lets her religious beliefs affect her work, when they should be completely separate.
@@yorgfigure6164 John Adams said "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." People are very confused these days about what separation of church and state is about. It is not to protect the state from the church it is to protect the church from the state.
@@yorgfigure6164 She has shown zero indication that her beliefs will influence her decisions whatsoever. You guys cant giver her the ol' Kavanaugh treatment so you're just grasping for straws at this point.
@Yorgfigure she’s showed no indication that she will let her beliefs affect her judgment, nor has she shown indication of party affiliation (other than what you assume). She is the perfect candidate for the empty slot for those same reasons.
This woman has been thru hell with these questions everyday. She is being hammered for no reason really.
@She’s so Lucky you know who doesnt answer any questions? fking Biden and Harris lmao
Yes I agree with your opinion. Inappropriate the way she's being treated!
Notice how ACB is not nodding her head to anything anyone says. She has an economy of words. She’s well versed and articulate. She’s a professional.
@@desertskys1 Professional Feelings Breaker*
Also yes it's refreshing to see something that seems so real, instead of some marxist nodding their head to anything the judges on the party say
@@desertskys1 So you prefer Supreme Court Justices that align themselves with one party or the other?
I also loved how she told them right then and there that judges are not bi pardison, kinda strange for Cody to then claim she's a puppet.
She didn't even know the protections provided under the first amendment....
Confirm her. She is smart and Intelligent. She will be a fair judge according to the constitution
Judges aren't fair. Judges interpret the law and whatever law is passed by the legislators even if it is all democratic legislatures.
exactly, so it shouldn't matter if she is a republican or democrat. All the need to do is determine if something is constitutional, thats it.
Yes the constitution, not Ruth’s judicial philosophy.
She admitted she hasn’t read anything about racial inequality in the justice system.
"We need more women in places of power" - liberals
Trump nominates a woman to the Supreme Court
"We need more liberal women in places of power" - liberals
As a liberal yeah I don't want an overwhelming right wing supreme court who could possibly overturn countless human rights cases.
Has nothing to do with the fact she is a woman. Hell I'd even be okay if she was slightly right. But someone who is as far right and as crazy fanatics as she is. I'm sorry someone who believes women should only obey their husbands . Probably shouldn't get to decide the date of the american women.
That was funny haha
@@clintbrunke2074 If you don't like it, you can leave 👍
@She’s so Lucky If you can get Harris in Presidency, yes
@She’s so Lucky Good luck to you, and God bless you 🙏
It always has to be a “woman” or “black”
We will have equality when it’s just a qualified person without woman or black in the wording
Truly. It may take another generation or two.
I think contrary to what u may believe, leftists want that too. But the reason it will take at least a couple more generations is not because BLM is bringing back racism - its cuz they r pointing out that now racism is subtle and that many are racist without beings conscious of all the ways they r doing so. Once these subconscious racist policies and actions are brought to light and people stop doing them THEN we can have a world where your minority background isn't a major factor. But until then, being a minority is always mentioned because it honestly does make it harder to succeed in certain areas. I know this from research, talking with friends, and some personal experience (though I must say there are some minorities that are worse off than me so I mainly trust the research). If you would like, I can link to some of my sources. Anyways, if you've read up to here, thank you! I know my perspective is different but I appreciate that you've read it anyway :)
@Uncle Tom So true! These days everybody is so sensitive and has to be politically correct. Many people feel like they are walking on eggshells these days trying to be careful not to accidently say/do anything remotely racist, sexist, etc. Racism won't stop until we stop making everything into a racist thing! I feel like before Obama was elected, we were all Americans, now we are divided on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, etc.
@Uncle Tom saaaaame
I see what your saying. I am black and I don’t want another trump with darker skin and a wig. I don’t want just ANYBODY. But the problem is, discrimination is real. Maybe not to some, they can pretend that it doesn’t exist because they are the majority and they will never have the minorities specific problems to relate to. Maybe that is you🤷🏽♀️. But there are plenty of times where a incredibly qualified woman or black person with experience and a doctorate will be declined and a man or white person will be chosen when they are less qualified. Simply because they are “superior” (yes people, this is a real thing, it didn’t just come from the sky, it happens everyday). We don’t want just ANYBODY, we just want everybody to get their shot. And with this country’s history, we can’t get that without bringing “black” or “woman” in the conversation. The numbers speak for themselves. Out of all 45 President, you mean to tell me that not one, not ONE person (besides Obama in all of US history) who wasn’t a white male wasn’t just as qualified or better for the job? If we don’t speak about these things and we don’t start including people who have barely been included before, I.e. women and other minorities, then we are robbing ourselves of people who can really bring change. People who have ideas that are beyond what you and I ever thought we needed. We don’t know who we are missing out on. We have to be fair. But again, like I said, I don’t want just ANYBODY just because. But we are crazy if we think that talented and qualified women and minorities have a fair enough chance for them to finally be out of the conversation.
She is the exact right replacement for RBG! We the people want this brilliant woman serving on the highest court of the land! God bless the USA 🇺🇸!!!
AMY IS A CATHOLIC FREAK WHO DOESN'T PRACTICE BIRTH CONTROL.
She isn't REPLACING, she is filling a vacancy. Move along and give her the seat she so deserves. She is smarter and classier than anyone in the room.
Exactly. 👍
My thoughts exactly. Thank you.
Especially the VP candidate
Agreed. Kinda like a breath of fresh air compared to what else is on court. Mite be interesting that she's also a mother of 7 kids etc. Maybe she should be Chief Justice. Likely can handle better the other 8 on the court.
It’s evident that she’s more intelligent and professional than many of the people asking the questions.
Barrett is versed in 3D logic..very refreshing.. Why and since when does she need to be a Ginzberg replacement?
Let's just stop all this Nonsense, Hand Amy the Trophy, and Confirm her to be the Next Justice on SCOTUS! Now🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Why you in such a hurry are you worried about the election?
@@lordbread2083 Not at all, President Trump will Defeat Presidential Candidate Harris!!
@CTS 2.0 overturning decades-old decisions that Americans do not want overturned does not make her a good fit
@@bobcam8353 its biden but I have a feeling you're playing dumb aka your natural state
@Ken Bugbee seriously going to talk about taxpayers money after AG Barr came up with nothing in the unmasking case
Judge Amy is awesome! No cheat sheets or flash cards needed. Fill that seat. Her predecessor can't compare to this Patriot.
Her patience is legendary.
Judge Barrett is a true inspiration and hope that all young women are inspired by her and not these celebrity hacks that have no business putting their two cents into the fire
Brilliant woman. She is also cool and composed. She will make a great justice.
She’s not replacing RBG. She is filling a vacant seat on the Supreme Court and she is more than qualified to be confirmed for the job.
EXACTLY
She comes unprepared to the hearings and can't say the first amendment rights correctly... yep, qualified.
She didn't know the protections provided under the first amendment of the Constitiution... That's not called prepared when the Supreme Court judges are supposed to uphold the Constitution and she doesn't know it
And that is true!!!
This woman needs to run for President. Seriously
She will do far more to help the US as lifetime Supreme Court Justice.
@@Ibebrappin How do you mean that??
Women shouldn’t be president they would be to sensitive.
@@mrsantoro8306 not this one
@@Ibebrappin seriously, Democrats don’t know ANYTHING
She's obviously the smartest person in the room, and that is becoming abundantly clear to both sides of the "aisle".
@Fortescue True that. Though, give her a break.
@Fortescue
Many of those questions she cannot answer because she is a judge and the left know this but continue to grand stand
So basically their arguement is that because she’s not a liberal, she’s not worthy of serving?
Yes
Yep
Basically anybody that's a republican shouldn't live in america.. which Is why they want communism so bad, why don't they move to China or Argentina or whatever
In a nutshell, yup.
@@jor-d5640 you’re extremely misinformed if you believe that Republicans want communism. What you said is ridiculous and idiotic.
She is so great!!! Their is NO REASON for her not to be approved.
Every democrat should vote against her
@Harry Morgan Next days, there will be a man leaking information about his sexual engagement with ACB.
@@duece152
What exactly would disqualify the Honorable Judge Amy Coney Barrett from her position as a SCOTUS Justice?
@@duece152 LOL. Drive by trolls need to get a life.
She will be approved. The hearing wasn’t necessary for her appointment. This is just a protocol. However it’s a protocol that very much benefits the right since the people can see how viciously current democrat party is to attack her for no reason. So in the end, Trump achieves 2 things. Open the middle voters eyes about the democrat agenda and appoint a fair judge. Win Win.
The problem is.. If they actually did their jobs, they’d be voting for a 3rd stimulus package by now.
Stop copying and pasting comments
I would have been a much better student if I had teachers like her.
Judge Barrett is her own person, she is no one's clone.
Just Trump's puppet.
Dems and society hate Individualism
i would cloner her if I had the technology
@@pipz420 Moron
She is not supposed to be another Ginsburg.
What? Inadequate replacement for Ginsburg? Perhaps, the left just wants a judge that is undoubtedly a pro leftist to be nominated on the supreme court. You don't need to be genius to know the judges they put on the supreme court always ruled in favor of the left. That's what the democrats want... dembs will call to vote to confirm Barrett at this on this very moment if she promise them to favor the leftist agenda....
But if Barrett promise the Dems that she will really be fair on her ruling? Is already a none starter and highly unacceptable position for the democRats. And that is the actual meaning of inadequate on democrats vocabulary.
If that's true, Barrett is inadequate nominee? Why the democrats has been out maneuvered on their assault every single time and even tried to hold their ground with sporadic fire. Assuming they havent accidentally shot each other. ; )
Inadequate (Dem.ver.) Anecdotal Etymology
In a typical day of DemocCrat Life... claiming to things they can't prove is a daily habit but prove themselves to be utter liars instead. Its no mystery, literally everyone can see on TV whats been unfolding in D.C. People are watching Dem just keep running and throw themseoves to a wall and splattered their brains all over it and triumphantly claim..."the wall is cracking" (Joe biden said to his aide.. Hunter, is coming to D.C. and make sure he visits me) So you see,.shes weak and very inadequate person to meet the Dem's high standard of biases needed. "Inadequate" dems version. 2nd meaning ... not bending to the will of democrat's temper tantrums.
She's is exact opposite
Thats right
@@ringgenie what I want to know if RGB was an adequate replacement for Byron White?
RGB replaced Byron White was she her own judge or did she channel him and his causes?
Judge Amy is not replacing Ruth specifically, just the seat.
For people that call themselves “progressives” they sure do live in the past.
They can't take their eyes off the rear view mirror
Good one!
Progressive is an obfuscation. It means they are communists. Former Communist David Horowitz, grew up in a communist household. His parents were communists, but he said they never referred to themselves as communists, but rather 'progressives'.
@@JohnAllen-gg1oz -- Yeah there’s a fair amount of that going on here. I won’t mention any names. Spacedog.
It’s funny how those who seek to confuse end up being the confused.
“Inadequate” is code for “not a liberal activist judge”
Exactly right
We cant have any more leftwing nutjobs in thejudicial system anymore we need law and order
This lady will be the best Judge on the court, she is extremity intelligent.
No it’s because she is inadequate. The lady didn’t refer to any notes and forgot what the five freedoms of the first amendment are, don’t you think that would be an important thing to remember if you’re trying to become one of the most powerful people in the judicial branch?
@@bigchef608 let me guess you're voting for a presidential candidate that can't even remember what office he's running for
Why would you expect her to be a replacement. She is her own person. Hope you get appointment Judge Barrett.
She is going to be a great judge
Democrats are crying
Is she confirmed?
@@tatianach917
Officially,not until the vote on the Senate floor
Unofficially, Yes
Because every Republican Senator will vote for her.Only a simple majority is needed .
Democrats votes are not necessary,there is nothing at all they can do to stop the vote.
@@schievelbeinschievelbein9263 💪🏼
she is simply an eloquent cult nut job
No one is crying, her confirmation has shown the people that the pursuit of justice was a thing of the past. We are living in times of this farce posing as “democracy”. I hope God judges these people who put party over country and the welfare of her people harshly.
You can just tell she is on a higher intelligence level than all of them.
A Democrat calling her an inadequate Ginsburg replacement is a compliment, in my opinion.
If they make a movie ab this, Nicole Kidman could play her 😂
You're totally right, she'd be great. Love Nicole Kidman!
She seems like a good runner up for PRESIDENT 🤔
Would have my vote
You are watching someone who will be a great justice. She makes the Senators look like the clowns they are.
The liberal* Senators.
Too bad for us she was not a senator. Good job for her she was not.
Very impressed with her composure and intellect while responding to some inappropriate questions.
I’d love to see these Senators answer their own questions
Bingo!
They'd be instantly triggered and offended!
Then they'd blame others for it!
and claim Victory?... No, "Victimy"
She’s not a replacement. She’s filling a vacancy, as her own person. 🙄
I love smart women. They bring a great balance to thought and discussion.
Race, Gender , Timing and Now Worthy? GARBAGE!
PURE DEMOCRATIC NARRATIVE
Dont forget they also attacked her religion
And her children. As a mom that also adopted a biracial child I’m so disgusted by this.
@@CailHampton True! Thanks for bringing that up...
@@islandthrifts809 of course! They want diversity, but not in adopted children
Seems to be the rule of the nation where the most qualified is unfit because of some bs narrative. So sickening!
Amy! In the HOUSE🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
I’ve really enjoyed looking back at this confirmation hearing. She delivered a great answer to this question. She seems very humble. I wonder if Justice O’Connor is one of her influences.
It’s like trying to argue with your Physics professor. You’re gonna lose son.
She's not replacing anyone,
She's filling a vacant seat.
True!, someone need to tell them🤣👌👌👌.
@Jezweet zelf no one is rushing anything, In fact Ginsburg filled the vacancy in shorter time span then her, so that argument makes no sense.
@Jezweet zelf You must be really dumb to believe this is the only time a supreme court justice is nominated in an election year
Go back read some history and come back.
@Jezweet zelf Can I just ask you this? If it is wrong for Trump to nominate a judge this election year do you think it was wrong for Obama too?
@Jezweet zelf not even. The president had a vacancy on the supreme court. He filled it. As is his prerogative based on the fact that it's part of his JOB. Democrats are just sore losers.
They need to stop playing politics with her. She's clearly more that competent
She's a lot more competent than those judging her that's for sure. Actually, many of them are down right embarrassing.
She's smarter than the whole room combined!
They are trying to bait her to use against her later. Duh, any competent person who understands the Constitution, kniws anything you say can be used against you in a court of law.
Clearly more competent than them!!!
She doesn’t have to be a clone of RBG or even close. She’s not trying to replace her she’s trying to fill an empty see.
RBG wanted 12 year olds to have intimate relations with adults. Why is this woman so great???
I just love hearing Amy Coney Barrett speak. Amazing voice, calm, humble, and just delightful to the ears.
I have always been a Democrat and I am appalled, as a strong, "feminist" woman, at how the Democrats have been treating Judge Barrett. They will never get my vote again.
You are a stupid Trump supporter and you know it.
Thank you, for your decency. Welcome to the train....❤
@@Shopmyst Go away....who asked you, anyway?
Love how the Dems seem to think she has to be just like RBG, as if the job description demands of it. These people are nuts.
she has morals which already makes her better. She is what this country needs.
Judge Barret the most adequate human! She is serious, smart, restrained, decent! She is the most worthy to be in such a high place! The better half of humanity stands up for you, dear Amy Barrett!!!❤️❤️❤️❤️
She is one of the smartest women I have ever heard. She's brilliant.
One of the smartest women? One of the smartest people. She seems to have at her command virtually all law and all the decisions she ever made, verbatim.
Coming from one who rarely loses a debate, I would not want to match wits with Amy.
Most intelligent person in the room. Haters gonna hate, unfortunately.
Oh yeah! We'll be hearing from the zombie robots right here on these comments any minute now. 😁
@boiling water Is this a serious comment?
@Fred Flintstone where's the proof? Everything I've read is on the contrary of your statement
Fred Flintstone no all of her other accomplishments do
@boiling water and there it is....
Oh and btw, you're a zombie robot
Great answer!!!! I’m glad she didn’t fall into that trap
Responds to an irrelevant question, and makes it a gracious and educating moment.
Now that is class.
WE the people do Not want another Ginsberg. This woman seems nothing like her,which is a good thing.
This woman is brilliant. The Democrats know they're in too deep with Judge Barret. Heck, Diane Feinstein actually half complimented her, that's saying something.
Hahahahah she’s not a judge hahahahahah y’all morons she’s a Barron legal which is two steps higher than a mba omg learn your legal statues
I notice that she is liked by both Republicans and Democrats. Democrats should therefore let loose and trouble judge Barrett's nomination no more.
They all are just mad at her because she has more smarts in her little finger then they do as a whole. She knows the law better then they do and that is what scares them.
Ginsberg was not a judge she was an activist. What we need is judges who will stick to what the law is NOT what they want it to be. That's the job of Congress to write the laws.
The law isn't absolute. The job of a judge is to read the law as they deem right. If the law was absolute, you wouldn't need judges.
@@NirmalThani You have it the wrong way round. Life is not absolute. That is why you need judges. To apply the law not to make it up to suit their political beliefs. You only have to look at Judge Sullivan to see he has lost all pretence of following the law and is ignoring the evidence and MIS-using it to fit his own particular agenda. That is not his role.
@@NirmalThani Not absolute? So judges can favor one group of people over another and it's ok because that's just their opinion?
@@NirmalThani That would cause chaos. As each judge would rule diferently on the same law. Each would be their interpretation of that law.
@Psalm23 4Me That was the Washington Supreme Court which Ginsburg has nothing to do with. Quit spreading fake news. Do you not know the difference between Washington state and SCOTUS?
This ACB is brilliant, poised and an incredible choice.
She will be fresh air on the court.
If a President isn't suppose to appoint a Judge in his last few months, then a kicker shouldn't kick a field goal in the forth quarter ???
that was the stupidest analogy ever! the president is supposed to play for the whole team which is America period.
It's hard for the bozos in DC to deal with a woman with a brain....She should be running for President as far as I"m concerned!
Top comment
ACB is a boss. The way she handle herself and respond back to every critic is amazing!!!
Lmao
What hearings are you watching? LOL
@@duece152 why did you laugh your a** off?
@@tr7938 you right it’s not a hearing. the dems are treating this as a campaigning opportunity
@@tr7938 apparently not the same one you’re watching.
This woman is absolutely brilliant-- maybe the sharpest legal mind ever to be considered for associate justice on the high court.
Sadly, on most media...never would have heard this. Thanks; Blaze.
She’s replacing nobody; she’s the one and only, and for sure she is going to provide with new and fresh ideas (so necessary actually) and winds of change to the U.S. Supreme Court!!!
Amy now has a drinking problem, 2 waters & a coffee! What have we done?
Lmao. Good one!
😂😂
And she needs the water to combat the salty senators
ACB is miles above any of those Senators in intelligence!
True, but that's not saying much. Many of them are dumber than a bag of hammers.
She is THE BEST!!!
I love IT when a woman says THINK not feel 😂😂😂😂
I loved the way both these woman spoke and handled themselves. One strong woman asking a question from another intelligent strong woman being viewed by a educated strong woman from home. I love it I can’t get enough! Love to all woman and whatever they choose to do with their lives. May the universe bring every dream you have into your life! Woman for woman!
Amy is the sharpest tack I've ever seen, she's cool, calculated, logical, extremely intelligent. Ruth would be proud in my opinion. They cannot smear this woman on any part of her background she is stellar. Why they're attacking her color, her childrens color and her religious beliefs... It's pathetic, just give her the job, she's more than qualified.
No, don't just "give her the job". Beg her to take it. The nation needs talent like hers.
Amen!
@@jimcherry685 the nation needs to slap everyone who fought for abortion RIGHTS in the face?
@@frostbite3820 figuratively, yes lol
She is likely the strongest, best judicial Candidate since her mentor, Justice Scalia. Bless her.
Not qualified in Gods eyes
So are we all gonna act as if we didnt see a monster energy drink on the senator's table🧐
She's a steamroller. A boss. Make room, stand back, 'cause here she comes.
A JUGGERNAUT AMEN AMY
Judge Barrett just needs to be herself. She’s not replacing Judge Ginsburg Judge Barrett is filling a vacant position. Qualified 100%
She is no ones replacement she is her own
She is a smart, bright and qualified lady and make these democrats look ridiculous.
To be fair the senator speaking is Republican
@Trojansfan I'm just being objective
She is brilliant. She deserves to be a Supreme Court judge.
I agree with you, she is one smart lady
1950: "In 2020 we are going to have flying cars!"
2020: "How to wash your hands."
This whole tradition is senseless! Just confirm her and move on!
I enjoy seeing how some senators are so full of themselves they will talk for 30 minutes about nothing just to give their pointless speech no one cares about. Very interesting
They might actually lose their tempo for a change!
Not only that, their speeches are full of outrageous lies. They are just using this as an opportunity to fool their ignorant base.
Thank God she is not an "adequate Ginsburg replacement", we do not need another Ginsburg, we want an Amy Barret, everyone brings their own skills to the table. Ms. Ginsburg was then Amy is now. End of the story.
She was, most likely, the smartest person in the building. She would make a fine president, Cruz/ Nunes 2024!
She is truly amazing. Fill that seat. This woman is not competing she deserves a fair chance and has my vote. Lets get on with it
I cant wait till she reverses roe v. Wade and removes women’s rights. Next she can ban us ladies from voting and going back to asking a man to open a credit card. Make again great again! Bring back the 1920s!!
Agreed she answered all there quiz questions
Its not about abortion. Its about economic issues. She is a federalist society corporatist. She will always vote on the side of the corporation. They do this on both sides because it is all one bought and paid for corporate state government. There is zero difference between left and right politicians its just identity politics theater. We need to come together on this point.
@@user-cg7em9jy5e oh gosh stop being extreme...plus she does not have to bring back the 20s, we already like in the 20s. Hence it being 2020 lol sorry had to
Ching Chong abortion is a state issue and likely will never change. Dems states with progressive government don't want kids anyways like AOC.
You don't replace a person. You fill a seat. That was never Ruth's seat, it's the people's seat.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Absolutely correct!
@Agent 007 Bond james bond wrong. It's the current standing president when the seat is available that gets to decide a nomination.
@@CandyRayne that guy’s repeating the anti-constitutional rhetoric the Democrats have been feeding him. They love their partisan stance. Hopefully they won’t be able to dismantle our third branch of government by packing the court.
@@TheQuestforHerobrine So what do you say about when McConnell denied the vote to elect Judge Merrick Garland in 2016 because he stated that “All we are doing is following the long-standing tradition of not fulfilling a nomination in the middle of a presidential year." ? Hypocrisy?
The Democrats showed their warm heart, their manners and their evil character. That's how the world see's you hypocrites.
ABOUT AS WARM AS BILL COLLECTORS HEART.
I hate preamble by politicians. Please ask the question already. I want to hear from the person answering the questions. Its not about you.
Man is ACB diplomatic to the point of nigh ridicule, shows a lot of dedication and ability to reason and an immense calm. She's the perfect fit for the Supreme Court.
She makes the people on the Committee look soooo stupid. She is insanely intelligent and 100% a great choice to be on the supreme court.
She doesn't know the protections provided under the first amendment of the constitution... that's not insanely intelligent... just saying
Shows you why these career Politicians need to go. There are people atbher level that can get stuff done fornthe American people.
You are so worthy and we are standing with you! 💖
All senators should face this grilling ......