Watch the top moments from Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
- The Senate confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett concluded Thursday. Here are some of Judge Barrett's most attention grabbing answers from the proceedings. For access to live and exclusive video from CNBC subscribe to CNBC PRO: cnb.cx/2NGeIvi
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday scheduled an Oct. 22 vote on whether to approve Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court in a rowdy hearing in which Democrats made procedural objections and said the rush to confirm the nominee was unprecedented.
As the hearing unfolded in Washington, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reportedly said in Kentucky that the Senate had the votes to confirm Barrett to the high court, essentially assuring that the efforts by Democrats to delay her confirmation will be unsuccessful.
McConnell, who was in his home state to cast his ballot, said he expects to bring Barrett’s nomination to the Senate floor on Oct. 23, Bloomberg News reported. That time frame would allow her to be seated ahead of the Nov. 3 election between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee.
There was little doubt that Republicans, who hold 53 seats in the Senate, would have the necessary votes, though Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine have objected. Trump has repeatedly pressed for Barrett to be seated in time to resolve any election disputes that arise.
The developments came after Barrett faced two days of intense but civil marathon questioning by senators on the Judiciary Committee on Tuesday and Wednesday. Barrett is expected to be confirmed by the committee by a party line vote, with all 12 Republicans in her favor and 10 Democrats opposed.
Democratic senators tried in vain to derail Thursday’s committee hearing. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., objected to the GOP effort to schedule the vote by noting that he was the only Democrat in the room, and that the rules required at least two members of the minority party to be present.
Committee Chairman Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., pushed on anyway.
“If we create this problem for you in the future, you are going to do what I am going to do, which is move forward with the business of the committee,” Graham told him.
Some Democrats, who had been waiting outside the hearing room, entered and objected to Graham’s move.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said the process was a “rush” and a “sham” and motioned to adjourn the hearing, prompting a round of speeches by members of the committee.
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC Classic: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCclassic
Turn to CNBC TV for the latest stock market news and analysis. From market futures to live price updates CNBC is the leader in business news worldwide.
The News with Shepard Smith is CNBC’s daily news podcast providing deep, non-partisan coverage and perspective on the day’s most important stories. Available to listen by 8:30pm ET / 5:30pm PT daily beginning September 30: www.cnbc.com/2020/09/29/the-n...
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
www.cnbc.com/select/best-cred...
#CNBC
#CNBCTV
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 3](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A1XXYbV048k/mqdefault.jpg)
This video left out a "top moment" when she was asked if she was reading from notes.
Yup
That was super impressive!!!
@Denise Ledford maybe if she had them she would have remembered the rights of the first amendment !
These hearings are weird sometimes because its people who are obviously less intelligent trying to catch out a smarter person
@Denise Ledford yeah, couldn’t remember what was the law. Bad sign. Most of us know the first amendment without notes. She doesn’t?
Never seen someone have so calmly go through Senate questioning...wow.
Because she is talking to bunch of democrat idiots.
She spends a normal workday listening to BS arguments and nonsense from one side or the other. It was just another week to her.
@Ladybug Turtle what have you done in life lol?
@Ladybug Turtle like Biden won't answer on packing the court. He stated we should elect him and find out.
@Ladybug Turtle Answer that question yourself and show me where in the constitution was it said or written. Can you give a straight and definite answer? DOES SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE SHOW UP ANYWHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION. Oh lemme guess you don't know what is all in the constitution? The constitutional basis of the Social Security Act was uncertain PERIOD. THIS IS ALL DEMOCRAT BS.
When someone is literally smarter than everyone for miles.
*By miles away
No she has no deep intellect, nor does it seem so. However she has very great skill of communicating without substance.. Deflection is an art more so than a product of brilliance.
@@Bruvafrmanothermotha If you only had ten percent of her intellect, you would most likely shut-the-hell up. But dumb and ignorant as you are, like most of those Democratic morons in the Senate, you just can not resist but to open your mouth.
Sid H She explained why she couldn’t answer the questions she wasn’t allowed to answer. Plain and simple. A justice cannot be nominated because they gave a forecast of their decisions - that’s incredibly corrupt to do so and there are specific laws to prevent the justice from giving a forecast or a promise of a set outcome. Sadly, the senators only seemed particularly interested in asking those kinds of questions as opposed to asking about her prior decisions and the reasoning behind them or her judicial philosophy. Basically, rather than respect the law as the philosophy it is, the senators attempted to defame law and drag it into party politics, hence why ACB was unable to answer many questions.
@@markarament6776 i respect her for her acomplishments and character. I am just saying this video does not sign towards any deep intellect of creativity. Like Elon or Tesla himself. She comes of to me like a person able to play 3d chess. I dont know if thats what i want on the court. RBG was a visionary.
“Do you believe that 1 + 1 = 2?”
“Do you believe that the sky is blue?”
“Do you believe that Orange man bad?”
Nope, for me he's been very good. I now earn more than thrice what I earned in November 2016 when he was elected. His economy made me flourish as never before, I would be a fool to betray him now!
@@jonathancummings6400 I’m simply boiling down what the Dems did here (You probably realize that.) Very VERY immature and stupid way of conducting ones self. “Leading the witness/Leading Question” as they call it in legal terms. Cannot believe Kamala who CLEARLY read word for word off of a script (which she either wrote herself or had someone else give it to her to say.) I mean she didn’t even take the time to memorize it to try to look somewhat genuine. 😂 It wasn’t much at all. Either way, Kamala was an absolute MORON for saying it to a woman who clearly knows the law like the back of her hand. She didn’t even deliver it well either! You could hear the tone in her voice clearly jumping ahead of herself to the question which she was attempting to “lead” her to. Cannot believe that’s all they could come up with 😂. Then again am I really surprised? No. They’ve shot themselves in the feet one too many thousand times. I’m calling a landslide victory.
@@joesmoe6947 Well spotted mate! She's creating a false equivalence with her arguments, same as Klobuchar tried to compare Roe v Wade to Brown v Board. She lists a long list of statements that are widely accepted without dissent, to which ACB will obviously answer "I agree" and then throws in the much more controversial topic in the same category of questions, as if to say "We all agree on this statement except for you, and that's why you shouldn't be on the SCOTUS"
Lol
@@jonathancummings6400 Amen!
"How many fingers a normal human has on their left hand?"
"Followup question - and number of fingers on their right hand?"
Kamala Harris had a 2 minute clip, and managed to make it the stupidest clip in the whole video. I am just baffled about how condescending she is, and I have a lot of respect for Amy, just based on how she did in this hearing.
Judge Barret totally slammed Senator Harris in that clip, Harris had a bad line of argumentation and she was totally called out. Sen. Harris trying to come off of it saying "So you've agreed it's a debatable issue" was almost laughable, of course it is. I think climate change is a problem, but it's obviously very political and nowhere near the level of the previous questions.
Jamal Trulove & Others are online + via TH-cam.com & not once has Senator Harris Publicly said she's Sorry as made Mistakes like Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, John McCain, Ron Wyden & Others including Tulsi Gabbard & President Obama & JFK & Eishenhower would have & did💖
@@johnyjo3973 The thing that was most annoying to me is she was tying to make it sound like they were the same thing to draw out an answer for a totally unrelated topic. She is free to ask a question, but don't have a smug self righteous smirk on your face the whole time while you are trying to speak about real issues. It comes off as disingenuous and rude. It also showed she thought that it was funny. It was like when a kid pulls a childish prank, and they sit there talking to the person they pranked snickering the whole time. She not only shows she doesn't care, but that she is a child. People are free to vote for Biden and Harris. It is there right, but to ignore these signs will ruin this country if it happens. I really urge people to open their eyes. It's like an endless loop of people only hearing and not listening, while walking in the dark.
And people still want kamala to be their VP..
@@wyunaboy who will wind up president if biden is elected
Harris: "Do you believe in life after love"
Judge: "Yes, it's in the constitution. The unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness..."
Gee .. I got you babe..Babe..I got..
Acb: if you’re a liberal Democrat the chances of it happening is 9 months. 😂
i don’t need
your sympathy
@@angela1708 WHAT SYMPATHY??? WHAT ARE YOU REFERING TO..SORRY I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT POINT YOU ARE TRYJNG TO MAKE...
She’s exceptionally impressive.
I like her!!! And, throughout law school,.I usually did not like conservative SCOTUS Justices.
@@JohnVJay so its intelligent to be against LGBTQ marriage?
@@mflo6365 It's not intelligent to ask unintelligent questions as yours.
@@thutranchannel1551 great. Why dont you learn how to speak with facts and have a normal discussion instead of insulting. I think that speaks more about you than it does about me
@@JohnVJay true
2:42 "I don't know where you're going with this." Translation: "I've seen enough litigation from lawyers to know when a line of questioning is attempting box someone in."
Democrats: Do you believe in Santa Claus?
So you're saying smoking is like Santa Claus, aka not real? Covid? Climate change?
Cindy Stewart what r u on about. The point was they are asking dumb and obvious questions.
@@Esmerelda-rm6qj he saying that the questions that were asked were obvious. Of course the virus is contagious and smoking causes cancer. These are not debatable. Yet they ask her those questions as if they expect her to say otherwise
@@bryangonzaleztorres9188 Did you not understand it was to compare those two subjects with climate change, because climate change is fact. It's not debatable like ACB said it is. Smh!
@@unbearablepun8608 if they were obvious then why didn't ACB assert that climate change is a fact?
When ignorance questions intelligence, intelligence will always win. Even when ignorance doesn't understand it has been defeated. That's why it is said that ignorance is bliss.
periodt
Hahaha I love it!
Ignorance is bliss until life hits you
Aptly said, Sir.
I saw no ignorance I. Any of the questions.
Straight up the most professional person I have ever seen... Period. No if ands or buts about it. END OF STORY.
@Ladybug Turtle but the prison wouldn't be liable in that situation.
that wouldn't make any sense
that's on the guard, not the prison
Are you listening to yourself ? lol
@Ladybug Turtle you're comment makes very little sense, conflicting statements lol
I cringe when I see people end their opinion statements with that tag line, as if the opinion becomes cemented into fact even without one premise to uphold it
@@askip9304 on the guard... who represents the prison they work at. If a worker sexually assaults someone on work time both the establishment and the worker should be held accountable. They are responsible for the people they hire. It makes a lot of sense if you actually think about it.
It truly touched my heart and my soul the moment when Judge Barrett's blind former student talked about Judge Barrett's kindness and patience helping her-a completely blind student achieve her lifelong dream of becoming a lawyer. Judge Barrett's immense kindness and passion speak for herself. Also, Judge Barrett had 5 kids of her own but still had extra love to adopt not one but 2 unfortunate children, and gave them a happy family. President Trump has never disappointed in us when choosing Judge Barrett to fill the SCOTUS seat. No one but Judge Barrett is best fit for the job. She is the one.
Besides the fact she wants to take away simple human rights and actually Judge Barrett could not even give us the first 5 amendments but go off!
@@leximccarthy922 Tell me what basic human rights she wants to take away. I'm not saying you're wrong, I just want specific examples of when ACB said she would try to take certain rights away.
@charlir wood Exactly
She's also a member of a crazy religious cult with weird things going on with children. So there is that.
Isn't that her job, what is so special about helping a blind student get her special needs equipment?
i actually expected a religious fanatic but acb is really quite smart and articulate. I suppose she should be as a judge.
That's why you shouldn't believe the media narrative and take it as gospel, but rather research and see things for yourself.
@@JAF2991 of course. Always an agenda
That’s how sociopaths work.
@@JAF2991 but don’t we all fall victim to doing that? I’m sure you think bc I’m a democrat that I condone all the things they do? We all have bias all I can say is I don’t see her being misleading I don’t see the problem
She is actually very biased and vastly by her denial of science which is influenced by her religious beliefs.
As a foreigner, I don't understand either the question of Harris lol. Like wtf is that. "Do you believe in science?"
Harris is just an evil period
@Gina R you are just like harris and the rest of the evil Dems - full of hatred, lying all the time and do nothing except for corrupt and harming your country
Y'all think either of these party think about your well beings lol. They don't. Side with your country, not a party.
Boom! And that is Amy Coney Barrett. She is amazing. I think she made 99.9% of these Senators look like bumbling fools.
They did that on their own. She just made no effort to protect them from themselves.
@Ladybug Turtle lol your reaching
At least.
@Ladybug Turtle those dumb questions were all democrats btw.
Smart person she don’t needs notes 😂 i did like that answers!
She answers like a real lawyer: "it depends.." 🙂
She is brilliant, liberals will dislike her cause she is a Judge and not an activist.
She is an activist. For corporate donors. You fool www.goiam.org/news/supreme-court-nominee-has-troubling-track-record/
Lol, she's for corporate America, an activist, and has been working against workers interest for years. How do you not know this?
@@violetfairies CNN tell you this?
@@had0629 CNN is not news. No.
She doesn't even know what the 1st Amendment says. Yet Trump cultists like you obediently worship her anyway.
She is an outstanding pick. Clear in her thoughts and calm in expressing them. I have not sure why Democrats hate her?
bias.
@Denise Ledford Biden, Pelosi, and most of the Supreme Court are all Catholics too
Well she “forgot” the 5 overarching components of the first amendment lol.
She took money from a hate group yet is up for Supreme Court justice.
She won’t answer when questioned about her stance on women’s rights.
@@clay___doh Can you cite some sources for these claims? Thanks. :D
@@jorsehph9216 Would love to. Here she is embarrassing herself live. If you don’t know the FIRST amendment in no circumstance do you belong on the Supreme Court.
th-cam.com/video/s6YNp475Q5Q/w-d-xo.html
This lady is presidential material!.
yeah--in some religious totalitarian state she would be
Nah. She is supreme court justice material
@@chrish9852 please do explain
Yes truly is . It's the first time I saw her in you tube I don't even know her as handpick of president trump. Her composure , intelligence , brilliance shines . She will be a good pressidentiable million times greater than Hillary clinton
Can’t be now. Supreme Court justices serve for life. And requirements for those two are very different. SCOTUS requires someone extremely well read, intelligent, and with a lot of respect for the law. The president needs to be very good at playing politics
ACB is America's mom. Love her.
She doesn't care about you and will steal your healthcare and basic labour rights.
@May Ling Yeah based on how she has voted in the past and also the idiot that nominated her.
@@renekostolnik5709 Nope, the Constitution will do that because the solutions the social justice champions chose to create those were in conflict with it. Therefore, to agree with the design of the USA, they must be undone apparently. Obamacare is clearly Unconstitutional, so are labor laws, the government wasn't EVER supposed to interfere with either the Healthcare industry or the private sector to that degree. So unfortunately, such solutions are easily undone with strict adherence to the Constitution. It's the way the USA was designed to operate!
More like America’s KAREN
@May Ling She is very open with her opinion. I don't have to guess. You are a fool if you believe she's anything but a tool for corporate donors.
She can't be bullied! That's for sure...
We should always pray for our country all is good to be good Jocelyn
ZZZZZZZ TROLL
She is so smart she is great.
I guess you’re easily impressed.
th-cam.com/video/s6YNp475Q5Q/w-d-xo.html
Just imagine being in a classroom setting and learning from Mrs. Barrett. What a privilege her law students had.
There would only be 1 lesson. Listen to corporate donors. www.goiam.org/news/supreme-court-nominee-has-troubling-track-record/
@Annie Awesome you realize that Amy is Catholic and Catholics are STRONG believers in science and have brought lots to the science community right?
#NotAllCatholics
U overrating her, she just answered questions neutral. Thats it
@@halilceyhan702 Because laws are neutral. She was nominated for a position to uphold laws. She answered neutral specifically because as a judge on the highest courts in our country it is her duty and responsibility to uphold the laws as written. Be honest, if you were to appear before a court, would you want to face a judge who makes their decision off of personal opinion rather than the law?
"Judge Barret, what is the wind speed velocity of an unladen swallow?"
an african or a european swallow...?
@@partickaljamested5146 I do know that !?
She's really fitting to be nominated. What people don't understand is that this is a life long commitment. From what she's explained and said, she will not allow outside factors affect her judgment & interpretation of the law.
She will allow corporate donors (who brought her to nomination) to affect her decisions. Or literally write them for her. www.goiam.org/news/supreme-court-nominee-has-troubling-track-record/
@@renekostolnik5709 Evidence for that statement please?
@@renekostolnik5709 If I were you, I would look at more credible news sources for this kind of accusation. That article is basically an opinion and barely gives any evidence.
outside factors?? I would consider the bible an outside factor.
@@renekostolnik5709 I just watched your link, and it isn't good.
I’m actually surprised as how open this post was coming from NBC. Kudos!
Even though I usually despise your bias, there wasn’t much bias except for the questions you chose to present here for Barrett to answer. Maybe your point was to infer something negative about Barrett or the President, but it only solidified my agreement w Barrett for this position!
She wouldn't answer anything. We all know her mind is closed.
@@laurakuzma5657 She didn't answer anything because of a thing called the Ginsburg Rule. It was a rule that was created by Democrats during RBG's confirmation saying that a nominee can not be forced to give opinions on cases or topics that are not already settled by the court. As a bonus, the Democrat that pushed the Ginsburg rule was former VP (at the time Senator) Joe Biden. She isn't closed-minded, she was following the rules of the committee.
Her mind is not closed. She as a justice nominee would rather opine in terms of meaningful judicial deliberations not as a constipated intellectual, or a judicial pundit!
“Bias” ...when you are probably used to watching the Fox Propaganda channel. Gtfo.
People remarking how smart and qualified Judge Barrett must be not be too bright themselves. She said nothing about anything to indicate what kind of a judge she would be, so there’s no way you could agree or disagree with her views or her qualifications. But as noted by others on this thread, *This standard practice for a nominee* so I’m no criticizing her for it at all. I’m laughing at the know-nothings in the general comment sections of these videos who say the senators are asking dumb questions and she’s making them all look stupid. Most people have no clue what they’re watching and it’s hilarious. I’ve seen a ton of these confirmation hearings. The senators know she’s not going to answer their questions in any direct sort of way; instead they’re putting statements in the record and also getting her responses recorded as a baseline. They know she’ll be confirmed. This is a game being played and 90% or more of the viewers don’t understand what’s actually going on. Ever watch a long, long legal case unfold over months or even years? IRL not on TV. Then you’d know nothing interesting happens for a long time, it’s mostly procedural. But little things happen. Attorneys are subtly getting a feel for the defendant, plaintiff, judge, the other attorney(s), jury if applicable, the case... and so on. It doesn’t happen in the space of a TH-cam video.
[As for NBC - not MSNBC - it’s one of the most reliable and least biased news sources out there: www.adfontesmedia.com/?v=402f03a963ba ]. Unbiased doesn’t mean splitting the difference, though. If there’s a turd on the sidewalk, a good news source should report the turd and not speculate too much about how it got there or why. But if half the people watching believe that turds are actually magic rocks, they shouldn’t give those people equal time and refer to it as a magic rock as well as a turd, because those people are *wrong.* News is meant to report facts. Editorials or opinion pieces should be clearly labeled as such and represents one person’s subject views. American media tends to editorialize WAY too much on both ends of the political spectrum in order to ingratiate itself to its target audience. Facts are often reported wrapped in a big dose of opinion. On the Right, facts are often misreported deliberately or “news” that doesn’t even pass the sniff test for most tabloids is presented as though it is verified fact, but only if it serves the conservative agenda. If it doesn’t, it could be an event witnessed by thousands of people and proven beyond a reasonable doubt by multiple credible sources, and the “News” source will bury it below some unimportant stories or else they will spin the hell out of it and make it seem to mean the opposite of what it actually does, and their audience won’t question the completely bogus take because they’re gullible morons who only get their news from that one source and are allergic to fact-checking anything.
@@laurakuzma5657 Don't be shy Laura, respond.
THAT is your list of "best moments"??
Nothing about her as a judge, her legal philosophy, her attitude to the constitution. Just a line of mostly Democrats bating her to respond to political issues. Such poor journalism.
And she still crushed them
Question:
Do you know what "status of the law" means?
When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman.
Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate?
A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play )
A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner.
But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges.
The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? )
It's in the hidden word play
That they dont teach you
Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own.
I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually.
The
.......
@Rich B Do know what a Judges one responsibility is?
To return property back to the owner.
Question:
Do you know what "status of the law" means?
When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman.
Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate?
A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play )
A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner.
But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges.
The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? )
It's in the hidden word play
That they dont teach you
Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own.
I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually.
The
She's very smart with her responses in being able to foresee the direct intent of a series of questions & professionally stating reasoning as to not providing a clear cut answer lol
A lot of those questions are trying to bait her into political discourse. Her job is to look at a case thoroughly from a legal lense and then make a ruling.
@@lanajohnson7401 Question:
Do you know what "status of the law" means?
When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman.
Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate?
A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play )
A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner.
But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges.
The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? )
It's in the hidden word play
That they dont teach you
Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own.
I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually.
The
@J L she devoted her life to law and all you see is the negatives because you are liberal
@J L Being born rich shouldn’t invalidate her opinions. Also Trump is not intimidating voters... please explain.
@J L I’m not voting for Trump this year I just like Amy Coney Barrett. You still haven’t answered my question. Also, stop saying the phrase kiss ass, it shows your clear bias
I believe ACB will be one of the greatest justice's ever appointed to the SCOTUS. She should have been selected last time!!
I feel she's Scalia's true successor. Hope she learns to write "zingers" as well him too!
Kamala doesn't even deserve to talk to this gentle woman, Amy
Really completely true. Soon Amy won't have to deal with these diseased vultures.
These were not the only highlights. This woman hand packed a lunch for everyone in that court room and hauled all those mushy brains to school
Question:
Do you know what "status of the law" means?
When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman.
Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate?
A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play )
A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner.
But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges.
The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? )
It's in the hidden word play
That they dont teach you
Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own.
I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually.
The
Are you saying she is the second coming of Phyllis Schlafly? Maybe. She is nowhere near being an activist. If you were schooled by here knowledge of the law, it's not because of a homemade loaf of bread. She will have a different role: to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the land just like that statue with a blindfold and a balance on her hand.
@@domingomelchor4902 mmk, well these people didn't actually expect her to give any kind of political responses. They certainly tried to manipulate her into giving a response they were hoping for, but her obviously well compartmentalized mind was unphased.
This is the kind of mentality not just our Supreme Justices need, but also our regular federal and state justices. I applaud Mrs. Barret for her commitment to remain apolitical and unvocal towards her personal political views to further confirm this conception that justices must be open minded and without motivation of any particular political bias. Good work Justice. I hope you are confirmed soon.
Oh my God I really do not like Senator Harris. She's so unlikable.
Wow she is amazing!
She is a threat to their corruption. That is why they hate her
th-cam.com/video/s6YNp475Q5Q/w-d-xo.html
As a democrat I do not endorse Kamila Harris I don’t think this woman is evil, asking her such foolish questioned wasn’t a good look. So tired of this division
So climate change is “debate?”
@@thepetersong No, the amount of impact Humans are having is the debate. And asking a judge to just answer yes or no to a field she has not had a case in is a bad look.
@@Darsam88 lol if you don’t think humans are causing climate change then you’re either brain dead or just don’t believe in science
@@thepetersong You are brain dead or just can't read, because i didn't dispute that humans don't affect climate change. what I said was "the amount of impact Humans are having is the debate". The reason that is the debate is because there were similar levels of warming before the 1st Ice Age. There have been multiple Scientists that have done studies showing man made effects on climate change have only affected regular climate change by a couple %. am I saying I agree with them, no, but there is information out there showing it's not just as simple as people are making it out to be.
The Democrats and Republicans MOSTLY agree on most problems and many solutions. It's just a shame that the Democrats stopped speaking to the Republicans. I do not blame the origins of that solely on the Democrats, just it's persistence.
ACB seems to be the smartest person in the room.
why are people against her? what's the context? just bias?
pure bias. She is the perfect judge. Outside of the party system and believes in the judicial branch.
Google her. She's a Catholic occultist. Which doesn't mean she isn't smart or even a good judge. But it's pretty gross nonetheless.
You mean where the Democrat Senators embarrass themselves by posturing for the cameras?
Barrett totally schooled the democrats. I don't know why they want to keep punishing themselves, but I always enjoy watching them expose their stupidity.
We ought to have leaders like her.
To steal your workers rights? www.goiam.org/news/supreme-court-nominee-has-troubling-track-record/
What a smart person she is, ACB is a great pick, even the biased media can't make her look bad. Well done Amy congratulations 👏🏾👍🏾
Yeah if we could we would see that she would rule with extreme bias. She's an extreme nut
@@laurakuzma5657 first off she's 1 of 9 on the Supreme Court so she wouldn't rules anything and just because she has different views than you dosen't make her a nut this lady is a genius and people are intimidated by her intelligence
She's not a genius. She is nuts and an extreme outlier. She is highly unqualified for a supreme court position. Period.
@@renekostolnik5709 reason being?
I liked kamalas questions, lol. Some real grade school tactics there. Don't let her do any business deals for me.
Kamala: gives yes or no questions based on literal fact
Amy Coney Barrett: well, um, senator, you see, um...
If they're facts then why ask them? Yes senator... smoking are bad 4 u. Its persuasive leading into a debate.
@@yesifixthings7867 to make sure she understands basic science/logic. ACB couldn’t even name all 5 rights granted by the first amendment.
Yes humans can't be infoulable. But if thats the worst thing that can be identified after 3 days of hearing amongst some of the most unusual questioning ever heard at a confirmation hearing she has shown the least bias of anyone. If anyone else, let's say biden was interviewed for 3 days im sure the amount of non perfect statements would be laughable.
@@yesifixthings7867 She's asking the questions to emphasize the fact that when she asks about climate change (WHICH IS ALSO AN UNDENIABLE FACT) ACB refuses to answer the question as if its something that is up for debate. Clearly she thinks it is. That was the point Kamala was trying to make.
Watch how dumb senators are while they try to berate a person who is measurably smarter than them.
Is this the woman who doesn't know the five freedoms of the 1st amendment
@@jimbo8651 Question:
Do you know what "status of the law" means?
When a name is spelled in all capitals it represents a corporation not a man or woman.
Why is your name spelled in all CAPITALS on your id and birth certificate?
A corporation is not living and need a living being to control it as defined by the court ( I think make sure and research self I could be mistaking the word play )
A Judges hidden job defintion is to transfer property back to the owner.
But the owners of the corporations don't need or want to handle their corporations when they get into trouble so they hire judges.
The owners of the corporations setup punishment and fines ( how can a owner collect money from their corporations when it gets into trouble? )
It's in the hidden word play
That they dont teach you
Ever wonder why only attorneys/lawyers and people who work for the government know the languages that govern you? There is written and verbal law that you will never know unless you become a worker or fight to find the truth and find out on your own.
I think it's time for the people to take back control of their lives and world together but also individually.
The
Democrats have met their match here. ACB doesn't talk off the cuff and without reason. She is a very impressive speaker and her comments are thought based. Kamala Harris looked like a rube here. As did Klobuchar.
"I couldn't possibly comment on a case not before me, that would be unbecoming of a future justice"
The background music here is completely unnecessary
@@RsPlyrtravis77 that’s surface level. If you listen to the tone of the music, you’ll notice it’s of a negative tone and dark sound. They did this because of the psychological affect it would have in viewers. Music is of a subtle nature and this it can have subtle affects on the human psyche, which is also subtle. The low tones and frequencies of the music correspond to feelings of fear, uncertainty and insecurity. So they want people to feel those things and associate those feelings with the Judge.
She ran circles around the senators questions! This is a very intelligent and capable woman to fill the role!
Are they literally testing her basic legal knowledge. Come on folks, she’s a seasoned judge, professor, scholar, and dare I say it; Mother. She’s heard it all lol
Three years on the bench is not a seasoned judge.
Why does this show Democrats asking only stupid questions? Why weren't some insightful , thought provoking, astute questions included?
They did not ask any.
@Shae Tallent yep thats the democrats philosophy for sure. pitiful sheep. Stupid is stupid does
@Shae Tallent ‘stupid is AS stupid does’
That's the point. They were simple questions and she still went around them and didn't answer them.
The questions may not invoke thought, but her answers certainly did.
Because there weren't any to include. in an effort to push her to show her political agenda, all they did was amplify theirs.
Note to conservatives on ACB (disclosure: I consider myself a conservative): It's entirely possible a Justice Barrett will vote on a case contrary to the way some of us would like the case to be decided. Based on her answers, we will still have to respect that she applied the law as best and as objectively as she could, not necessarily as we hoped she might. Just a word to the wise.
Yes and that’s the whole point of the Judicial branch. They aren’t supposed to act on their personal political beliefs. They were created with the intent to make decisions based on their interpretation of the Constitution.
This is why the entire narrative that the left is trying to perpetuate that her religious beliefs make her unqualified is ridiculous.
That is still a huge imrpovement over liberal activist judges.
real conservatives believe in your sentiment
As a conservative, I believe the court should be independent and vote on the merit of the case law and with that belief, I understand and accept that I may be disappointed.
That also means, I shouldn’t be forced to be disappointed because a justice wants to be liked and advocates activism to make a point against a President he/she doesn’t agree with (ahem, Justice Roberts).
Judges deciding as some people like it is the dream of totalitarian thinkers. That”s why some want to pack the court, they hope to control the judiciary, and rule over us like a monarch with absolute power. They forget one day the other party will be in power, and will ruled with absolute power as well, or one party remains in power forever and we would have a dictatorship.
She's a beautiful soul. An so smart.
Best appointment yet by the President.
Bravo Prez Trump!!! ❤🇺🇸❤🇺🇸
She did an amazing job of handling a bunch of total TROLES! Wow, I am even more impressed now than I ever was before! Great job & can’t wait to have her as a Justice!
Amy Coney Barret is a boss. The best Supreme Court Judge chosen by the best President Donald John Trump. Trump 2020 🇺🇲❤💙🤍🇺🇲
Perhaps a better title would’ve been “Dems trying to bait ACB, but she stays classy and judicial.”
She answered questions without looking for a notes.
Because she didn't answer anything. Just blabbed through with pointless words.
She doesn't believe in climate change. Oh god help us...
@@blinkblink2255 what kind of a midget mind do you have, 2nd or 3rd grader?
Definiton of Cool, Calm and Collected.
"You've made your point that it's a debatable point." -- No, she made her point that it's a topic of major contemporary controversy among public opinion, giving an opinion on which, outside of a case, would be inconsistent with impartial procedure.
Nobody got they're way with her ..and they're demonic ways...good🌠
What?
Nobody got their* way with her.... And their* demonic ways... Good.
She didn't answer any questions. What was she hiding?
And why is that OK with you?
@PINK LADY they are failures..
@Annie Awesome .I know she is!!
@moonlight moon 😳😳😁😁✌️✌️
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Keanu Reeves wouldn’t dodge these bullets like this.
She is brilliant.
@Bubble O Bill stfu
Yeah too bad she uses it the wrong way.
Just a wise woman. Hope God continues to bless and give her wisdom
Absolutely not
@@jordan97420 Welp... that’s what the comment sections are for... expressing opinions 😬
ACB should definitely be a SCOTUS Justice! Beginning with Thomas as my first, I have never witnessed a more qualified potential candidate for the SCOTUS. She IS NOT a croud pleaser but an independent free thinking and self realized individual worthy to become a SCOTUS Justice. May she be confirmed!
And both Thomas and Barrett were maligned and lied about by the same liars that used a fake dossier the CIA told the FBI was phoney but still attempted an illegal impeachment. Thank you Democrats for six plus years of anarchy, lies, innocent lives ruined, arson, crime, and incompeten ce aided by your equally corrupt media stooges.
I am impressed with the learned judge's responses!
Kamala Harris thought she really threw down the mic on that one....
Why does the highlight include more questions from democrats than from Republicans?
They didn't really question her much. It was mostly fake fawning praise.
It was edited by CNBC, they actually thought that this video makes the Democrats look good.
she is the perfect judge. I didn't realize how good she was. Almost robotic but perfect.
yuh huh...sure Bozzo.....a religious cult member makes a good judge--in the Inquisition perhaps
The affordable care acts means i have to pay more for my insurance.
I consider myself a democrat, but I am extremely impressed with Judge Amy Coney Barrett. She sounds like one of the most intelligent/well spoken individuals I have ever heard speak at a senate hearing. She seems extremely wise, and with the supreme court being a lifetime role, I expect her to make multiple morally correct decision moving forward. She seems like the great bi-partisan judge.
What are your thoughts on the new nomination Jackson?
Jeepers the Democrats are really petty.
Man she was so awesome I was watching this in tv and listening to some of these questions they tried to pull her in with and she was extremely amazing super smart and I like her I think she will do fantastic
These are your choices for "top moments"? I found them to be unconstructive and felt that each of the people who were supposed to be asking Judge Coney Barrett questions regarding her qualifications and comments on her experiences on the bench, but instead spent their allotted speaking times pushing their own agendas, mostly regarding their dislike for Trump and his administration, and their feigned concern regarding the overturning of laws such as those that have made and keep abortion legal, whwn there are no cases on the horizon that will call those into question and require even lower courts to cast additional legal decisions, let alone make it to the Supreme Court where those judges would have to vote. These hearings have become like everything else the Senate has turned matters into lately, a joke.
I wonder what cnbc had in mind when they titled this ‘top moments’
I would say she answered very well.
I don't know.........I can't answer that...........it wouldn't be fair......
WoW she handled them!
Here another beautiful view in a foggy november forest 😊 - Beautiful day or night everyone 🙏 wherever you are
🌈 Love, light & peace
I'm left-leaning, but I really like Barrett as a person. Smart, conscientious, and remarkably calm. Way better than Kavanaugh.
She is the sort of person that countries need in positions that make a difference..hugely professional, articulate and smart.
Who else can be?
Lawyers say “it depends” for a reason but senators don’t seem to understand that.
shes got a damn good head on her shoulders
Thee most qualified ever! just follow the Constitution as written.
And the constitution never contemplated the rights of the black people they enslaved or the rights of women. If we were all following the constitution then ACB wouldn't even be a judge.
@@chysel4860 just my opinion if you don't want to follow the constitution don't let the door hit you on the way out of this country
@@chysel4860 it never say anything about slavery or womens rights i think you confusing it with the Democrats of the Civil War in wich it took thr Republicans to defeat slavery.
@@michaelgarrido381 you do realize that the parties switched after that happened right? the Republicans of the Civil War era became the Democrats of today...
@@jackpage5895 that is what you say they are keeping the chains on by offering to take care of there slaves with freebies free healthcare free food free housing free collage free everything for your vote on the backs of working people.
Became a fan. ACB is amazing.
Amazing!!! Simply put amazing!!!!
AWESOME JOB! JUDGE AMY BARRETT
Outstanding answers! Judge Barrett is flawless! Is is embarrassing and painful to witness what she had to go through!
She signed an add calling roe vs wade add barbaric. When they asked her about it, it sounded like she skimmed over it. Downplaying her signature. What kind of judge signs off on something she didn't read?
so... what did she answer
She is a smart, witty, intelligent woman judge
@JDMime i mean if simple means stupid, then yes. She won't answer simple questions
Another Trump stooge, not qualified.
MT Trump put 3 Conservative judges.
It is right.in the history of the United Sates.
'It's the Handmaiden's Tale REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!
lol!!
Now the problem I have is find a attorneys that will take my case
They forgot the part where she starts naughtily smiling when some Republican starts talking about “Softball questions” and she says “I love softballs” 🥴
Pepe is pro Trump. Change your profile picture bro. That's just cringe.
Naughty... go back to reddit/tumblr politics clown 😒
Amy is an old school American woman. She is exactly the person for this position. May God bless her with many years on the court.
This side is scary. And I've only seen just a gist of it. Yikes 😬
When was the last time you saw lindsay Graham with hair
Judge Barrett is literally the smartest person in the room.
Smartest person in D.C.!
Such a strong, independent woman.
That has shut down strong, independent women. Ya got duped, derp.
Why are the questions so applicable right now... this is...wow they asked this 2 month ago