So far this list has been proving my stupidity one after the otherI dont think I solved anything corectly until now. . Fun stil regardless. Thank you very much.
i have a doubt....generally we are taking the volume is the minimum for minimum material.but here we are taking surface area is minimum in this case.why ...please help me?
It doesn't matter if it is the volume, or cost, or surface area or any other function. Any quadratic or cubic equation potentially has a maximum and a minimum.
So far this list has been proving my stupidity one after the otherI dont think I solved anything corectly until now. . Fun stil regardless. Thank you very much.
Wish I could have seen it.
This cylinder can't exist in the real world. In any case, the problem's still a fun game with basic calculus.
i have a doubt....generally we are taking the volume is the minimum for minimum material.but here we are taking surface area is minimum in this case.why ...please help me?
It doesn't matter if it is the volume, or cost, or surface area or any other function. Any quadratic or cubic equation potentially has a maximum and a minimum.
well minimum surface mean u need less materials to build
and in this case the function is concave so there's no local or global minimum problem