Juan Maldacena - Why is the Quantum so Mysterious?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2022
  • Particles at two places at the same time-superposition. Particles communicating instantly with no respect to distance-entanglement. How to make sense of such weirdness? Quantum mechanics is how the world works at deepest levels. But nobody has any idea why.
    Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
    Watch more interviews on the beauty of the universe: bit.ly/3mRsDjS
    Juan Martín Maldacena is an Argentine-American theoretical physicist and a professor at the Institute for Advanced Study’s School of Natural Sciences in Princeton, New Jersey.
    Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
    Closer to Truth, hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn and directed by Peter Getzels, presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.

ความคิดเห็น • 150

  • @kA-dc6zq
    @kA-dc6zq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was reading a book on quantum when I came across this genius man's name. I couldn't understand his notion about entanglement. So I decided to check TH-cam. It was so amazing when I saw his picture. I had seen him several times in closer to truth but I didn't know his name. Anyway, he is really loving and very knowledgeable. I love him.

  • @johnpetkos5686
    @johnpetkos5686 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I've read about this guy in so many books, but I hadn't seen him prior to this! He's regarded as a mega genius in string theory community.

    • @ishkalm4849
      @ishkalm4849 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Pr. Loenard susskind literally said that he is the best theoretical phycisist alive, so ..

  • @jamesbentonticer4706
    @jamesbentonticer4706 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Juan Maldacena is currently one of the most intelligent members of our species.

    • @maxwellsimoes238
      @maxwellsimoes238 ปีที่แล้ว

      certain he are smart Cosmology but his quantun theory not show up trully Universe. He only show up inteligent quanta in the Universe without fundamental phich are absurd anti phisch.

    • @kipponi
      @kipponi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes he is.

    • @S3RAVA3LM
      @S3RAVA3LM ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Who would you consider the Wisest?

    • @jamesbentonticer4706
      @jamesbentonticer4706 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@S3RAVA3LM perhaps Edward Witten but that's a tougher question :) what would you say?

    • @johngenereux7559
      @johngenereux7559 ปีที่แล้ว

      Juan Mailacens

  • @adamd3820
    @adamd3820 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I could listen to this guy for hours.

  • @crazieeez
    @crazieeez ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow. This guy is amazing. He explains things we could all understand. He says space-time is an emergent property and provides an analogy like a lake surface, but if you zoom deeper in the lake, it is molecules jumping up and down.

  • @redriver6541
    @redriver6541 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent episode CTT.... Thank you for these.

  • @monchoglu
    @monchoglu ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just got goosebumps listening to Maldacena, and yet he's here sharing 1% of his knowledge.
    What a time to be alive

  • @jnk3775
    @jnk3775 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s certainly hard to understand and believe, but it’s also very interesting!

  • @Dion_Mustard
    @Dion_Mustard ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I listen to their marvellous discussion and am hit with the obvious notion..that everything we know to be could not possibly be an accident or have no meaning...there has to be meaning and purpose behind existence and indeed consciousness. I don't see any other way out of it. Existence exists for a reason , so to speak!

    • @kos-mos1127
      @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว

      Existence exists because it is.

  • @young1939
    @young1939 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All of this is so far above my understanding that I think it will take me many life times to be able to even get a clue as to what they are saying.

  • @melanynadine972
    @melanynadine972 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh boyyy.. for anyone who read books/articles related to string theory Maldacena is a rock star!! :0 I'm seing the legend!

  • @mathematicaluniverse2262
    @mathematicaluniverse2262 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Physicists are my scientific heroes, in particular mathematical physicists love ❤😘❤😘

    • @maxwellsimoes238
      @maxwellsimoes238 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Me too. However guys aren show up his Universe hipotesy though math or phich using only consistence speculation. Enough arent enough. IoI

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Algebracadabra! 🦄

    • @maxwellsimoes238
      @maxwellsimoes238 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fluentpiffle gibberish hilarious

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@maxwellsimoes238 It’s mathemagical.. 🤪

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      @aDBo'Ch 1 Imprecicely!

  • @alejandroggzz8833
    @alejandroggzz8833 ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved this video 😍, By the way, I notice that they mispronounce the name of this great physicist.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can time flow, and curve, into the future? As space curves locationally in three dimensions, time might curve sequentially into the future?

  • @rajendratayya8400
    @rajendratayya8400 ปีที่แล้ว

    The wave like behaviour of a subatomic particle is only viable microscopically in the lateral dimension. But it is not observable on spatially large scale, because it is a numerical approximation.

    • @elijahofmalachi31themessen27
      @elijahofmalachi31themessen27 ปีที่แล้ว

      Malachi 2 proves Malachi 3:8-11 is talking to the thieving church leaders -- it is prophetic instruction for the church leaders to repent! Every single major church and fake preacher on television knew since August of 2020 if they brought the money back they were never supposed to take for ministering then God would end Covid but they love money so much they intentionally chose to kill everyone instead of repenting.
      Seriously, do you really comprehend that? The church leaders LOVE MONEY SO MUCH that they INTENTIONALLY CHOSE TO KILL PEOPLE instead of repenting. Every time they collect money for ministering they know they are killing people with Covid and they still do it! Could you imagine for almost 2 years walking into your "church" on Sunday and knowing every single time you asked people to take that piece of paper in the back of the pew and pay tithes you knew more people would die from Covid and you did it anyhow? 😭😭😭😭
      And you knew monetary tithing was a lie on top of it! So you also wilfully committed fraud.
      That is SICK. All these people need prison time for murder and fraud.
      (Prophets said my preaching will eventually result in a wealth redistribution through the banks and universal monthly income for everyone. I am Elijah of Malachi 4:5-6.)
      STAY OUT OF THE FAKE CHURCHES. GOD HAD ME CALL FORTH FIREBALLS TO HIT THEM.
      Now, world peace is coming!! But what will happen to kill wicked people if they don't repent?
      Btw, there is no ONE antichrist, it was made up by demon hybrids that worship money and want you to believe in pretrib rapture so you get on their "UFOs" when they tell you to leave the anet to go somewhere safe.
      Jesus comes back to rule, got it? So Gods real people will live forever. World peace is coming.
      And same sex marriage is NOT a sin. Male or female is determined by gender🏳️‍🌈, located in the brain.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could the expansion have something to do with future time?

  • @lukaradojevic7195
    @lukaradojevic7195 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Space-time tells matter how to move,matter tells space- time how to curve"J.A. Wheeler....general relativity summed up

    • @elijahofmalachi31themessen27
      @elijahofmalachi31themessen27 ปีที่แล้ว

      Malachi 2 proves Malachi 3:8-11 is talking to the thieving church leaders -- it is prophetic instruction for the church leaders to repent! Every single major church and fake preacher on television knew since August of 2020 if they brought the money back they were never supposed to take for ministering then God would end Covid but they love money so much they intentionally chose to kill everyone instead of repenting.
      Seriously, do you really comprehend that? The church leaders LOVE MONEY SO MUCH that they INTENTIONALLY CHOSE TO KILL PEOPLE instead of repenting. Every time they collect money for ministering they know they are killing people with Covid and they still do it! Could you imagine for almost 2 years walking into your "church" on Sunday and knowing every single time you asked people to take that piece of paper in the back of the pew and pay tithes you knew more people would die from Covid and you did it anyhow? 😭😭😭😭
      And you knew monetary tithing was a lie on top of it! So you also wilfully committed fraud.
      That is SICK. All these people need prison time for murder and fraud.
      (Prophets said my preaching will eventually result in a wealth redistribution through the banks and universal monthly income for everyone. I am Elijah of Malachi 4:5-6.)
      STAY OUT OF THE FAKE CHURCHES. GOD HAD ME CALL FORTH FIREBALLS TO HIT THEM.
      Now, world peace is coming!! But what will happen to kill wicked people if they don't repent?
      Btw, there is no ONE antichrist, it was made up by demon hybrids that worship money and want you to believe in pretrib rapture so you get on their "UFOs" when they tell you to leave the anet to go somewhere safe.
      Jesus comes back to rule, got it? So Gods real people will live forever. World peace is coming.
      And same sex marriage is NOT a sin. Male or female is determined by gender🏳️‍🌈, located in the brain.

  • @earthculture214
    @earthculture214 ปีที่แล้ว

    When were these interviews recorded? What year? They have a 90s vibe to them.

  • @NikkiTrudelle
    @NikkiTrudelle ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’ve been watching interviews with this guy for a while , and some of the people who interviewed him in the past were totally horrible at it because he’s so full of complex information. However Laurence does such a great job , the conversation flows well, and he’s only asking relevant questions.

    • @elijahofmalachi31themessen27
      @elijahofmalachi31themessen27 ปีที่แล้ว

      Malachi 2 proves Malachi 3:8-11 is talking to the thieving church leaders -- it is prophetic instruction for the church leaders to repent! Every single major church and fake preacher on television knew since August of 2020 if they brought the money back they were never supposed to take for ministering then God would end Covid but they love money so much they intentionally chose to kill everyone instead of repenting.
      Seriously, do you really comprehend that? The church leaders LOVE MONEY SO MUCH that they INTENTIONALLY CHOSE TO KILL PEOPLE instead of repenting. Every time they collect money for ministering they know they are killing people with Covid and they still do it! Could you imagine for almost 2 years walking into your "church" on Sunday and knowing every single time you asked people to take that piece of paper in the back of the pew and pay tithes you knew more people would die from Covid and you did it anyhow? 😭😭😭😭
      And you knew monetary tithing was a lie on top of it! So you also wilfully committed fraud.
      That is SICK. All these people need prison time for murder and fraud.
      (Prophets said my preaching will eventually result in a wealth redistribution through the banks and universal monthly income for everyone. I am Elijah of Malachi 4:5-6.)
      STAY OUT OF THE FAKE CHURCHES. GOD HAD ME CALL FORTH FIREBALLS TO HIT THEM.
      Now, world peace is coming!! But what will happen to kill wicked people if they don't repent?
      Btw, there is no ONE antichrist, it was made up by demon hybrids that worship money and want you to believe in pretrib rapture so you get on their "UFOs" when they tell you to leave the anet to go somewhere safe.
      Jesus comes back to rule, got it? So Gods real people will live forever. World peace is coming.
      And same sex marriage is NOT a sin. Male or female is determined by gender🏳️‍🌈, located in the brain.

    • @feynmanschwingere_mc2270
      @feynmanschwingere_mc2270 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Juan is a super genius. Top 5 physicists alive alongside Witten and Weinberg.

  • @positivityplace
    @positivityplace ปีที่แล้ว

    Just came up on me recommended videos and saw it and I think I need to learn a couple of languages before looking at this video again...

  • @jimjackson4256
    @jimjackson4256 ปีที่แล้ว

    So how much is time slowed in the center of a nucleus?

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are quantum fields part of the time aspect of space-time?

  • @gigelchiazna1573
    @gigelchiazna1573 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "space-time emerges" = magic, abracadabra ...

  • @Spontanomuse
    @Spontanomuse ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Two questions;
    1. Is it true to say that on the event horizon of a black hole time stops and space in infinite?
    2. Because our universe started in a small singularity, does it mean that by the laws of Quantum Entanglement, all the particles are connected and are effected by one another?

    • @johnyharris
      @johnyharris ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm not a scientist, but from what I've read I'll attempt to answer your questions.
      1. Not at the event horizon, but at the singularity spacetime becomes infinitely warped and so time stops. At least it does classically speaking but this doesn't work because the scales are so small the quantum effects should explain what is going on. Hence the search for a quantum gravity solution.
      2. Entangled particles stop being entangled once decoherence takes effect after a measurement has taken place. As observers we only interact with a classical 'decohered' reality. So we don't witness entangled particles under normal circumstances.

    • @Spontanomuse
      @Spontanomuse ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnyharris
      Thanks..

    • @kos-mos1127
      @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Singularities do not exists they are approximations. Quantum Gravity would remove singularities.

    • @Spontanomuse
      @Spontanomuse ปีที่แล้ว

      @@abelincoln8885
      Thank you

  • @r2c3
    @r2c3 ปีที่แล้ว

    rate of energy flow seems to depend on spatial variability...

  • @alsindtube
    @alsindtube ปีที่แล้ว +1

    While I love how Lawrence probes complex issues, I have noticed what I believe to be a major flaw in his inquiries, namely his interviews with theologians. They appear to be almost exclusively western, Christian ones, seldom ones from eastern traditions. Yet it’s the eastern traditions, especially Buddhism, that has parallels with quantum physics. There seems to be an inexplicable omission of these points of view, while again, ancient Buddhism in particular seems to be in line with the relatively recent findings of quantum theory.

    • @donbronkema7503
      @donbronkema7503 ปีที่แล้ว

      Siddarthan self-denial flows from scarcity. Our problem is excess. Siddartha ignored cosmogony as meaningless, but the Western mind insists upon confronting its madness. The kosmos is an emerging quasity, not a 'thing', let alone a Hegelian ding-an-sich. Strings are mere footnotes. See what aye mean, Verne?

    • @diraceq
      @diraceq ปีที่แล้ว

      Which parallels does Buddhism make with QM?

    • @jimjackson4256
      @jimjackson4256 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@diraceq None it is all nonsense.

    • @lesselp
      @lesselp ปีที่แล้ว

      If you search search the channel for 'Eastern' you willl find what you are looking for.

  • @captainandthelady
    @captainandthelady ปีที่แล้ว

    How slow would time be if you were slowed down to absolute 0 meters per second relative to everything else in the universe?

  • @JesseRedmanBand
    @JesseRedmanBand ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If objects are moving away from us faster than the speed of light, we will never see them. But couldn't that explain the missing matter that physicists call dark matter?

    • @kos-mos1127
      @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Jason R What has this to do with anything.

    • @monchoglu
      @monchoglu ปีที่แล้ว

      We know there's dark matter in close galaxies by the way the move and the varionic matter we see.

  • @Corteum
    @Corteum ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's only a mystery when your understanding is incomplete.

  • @johncox2865
    @johncox2865 ปีที่แล้ว

    Might life have evolved so as to minimize perception of these differences? Could it have evolved differently?

  • @ivanbeshkov1718
    @ivanbeshkov1718 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder about things like: at what rotation speed would we feel the earth's rotation?

  • @ZahraLowzley
    @ZahraLowzley ปีที่แล้ว

    Prime degree recursive. H\C\N\O undifferentiated linear sequential, Hn paradigmatic. Thymine has articulate interface, example of recursion . All of 4, even numeracy but you miss components. Combine them for coordinates

  • @Robinson8491
    @Robinson8491 ปีที่แล้ว

    A hyperbola is a cone slice, just like the parabola (and the ellipse and the circle), and the parabola is the orbit corresponding to a freefalling object in flat spacetime, which when corrected for time dilation probably is a catenary curve. I solved it, thank me later :P Just kidding
    Still never heard any explanation anywhere how on earth he came up with Ads/CFT. We all know the story about Einstein and his equivalence principle and photon clock, but I want to know his story! Could you interview him about it someday? It would make it more intuitive to a lot of people for sure!

  • @DrDeuteron
    @DrDeuteron ปีที่แล้ว

    It was David Mermin who said "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, then you don't", not RPF.

  • @jesstrang5085
    @jesstrang5085 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nothing mysterious after you've read Mike Hockneys books on ontological mathematics. The only series of books out there that explain just anything!

    • @app0ll0nysus
      @app0ll0nysus ปีที่แล้ว

      There's an Ontological Mathematics channel on here. Look it up. By that name.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is mysteriousness of quantum (and maybe consciousness) have to do with future time? The past is history, and the future is mystery, while the present is a gift . . .

    • @lesselp
      @lesselp ปีที่แล้ว

      Deep, man

  • @A.--.
    @A.--. ปีที่แล้ว

    Time on a neutron star is 70% slower. Is that bescue motion is 70% slower due to extreme gravity causing 70% more inertia? Is this how time-motion-gravity are interlinked?

    • @johnyharris
      @johnyharris ปีที่แล้ว

      No, time is 70% slower on the neutron start relative to an observer on Earth. However if you were on the neutron star (not advisable) time would seem to flow normally but time on earth would be flowing 70% quicker. That's special relativity.

    • @A.--.
      @A.--. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnyharris maybe time in both places is identical, you just have to "add" the time taken to get to earth to compare the two clocks and by adding this time it looks delayed?

    • @johnyharris
      @johnyharris ปีที่แล้ว

      @@A.--. That's not how special relativity works. If you were on Earth and travelled to the neutron star, let say it took a year. When you got the neutron star you spent half an hour looking round and the set off home. An hour later you arrive back at Earth. By your clock you have been gone 2 1/2 hours but everybody on earth has aged 12 years (this just an example and isn't precise because I can't do the math)

    • @A.--.
      @A.--. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnyharris maybe hypothetically it takes 1 yr but if we try this experiment it takes almost 6ys one way?

  • @sven888
    @sven888 ปีที่แล้ว

    It almost seems certain to me that truth is simple.

  • @babyl-on9761
    @babyl-on9761 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could the "mystery" of quantum have to do with the limitation or inability of math to overcome the reality of the subjective human experience of the world?

    • @dogsbollox4335
      @dogsbollox4335 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Before the big bang all that was there was empty space ,how did it come into being .

    • @kos-mos1127
      @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dogsbollox4335 Quantum entanglement of atoms of space.

    • @mose1883
      @mose1883 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kos-mos1127 before bigbang there was no space or atoms to begin with...

    • @kos-mos1127
      @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mose1883 Before the Big Bang is an oxymoron because spacetime emerged after the Big Bang. Matter would be compressed to a zero point everywhere with intense temperature. There can still be building blocks of space caused by entanglement.

    • @mose1883
      @mose1883 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kos-mos1127 are you suggesting that quantum energy always existed and there was no point of begining for it? In that is the case how did the big bang happened suddenly? for me there has to be some kind of random fluctuation caused by the will of that energy, is this energy sentient?

  • @chargersina
    @chargersina ปีที่แล้ว

    When the space expands, space time must expand. What does that even mean time will expand?

  • @jazzunit8234
    @jazzunit8234 ปีที่แล้ว

    The energy from black holes must cause the expansion of the universe as matter inside and outside are entangled

  • @peterpanino2436
    @peterpanino2436 ปีที่แล้ว

    What place does "consciousness" occupy within space and time? Is "information" a component of space and time?

    • @kos-mos1127
      @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว

      Consciousness is emergent.

    • @peterpanino2436
      @peterpanino2436 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kos-mos1127 What do you mean by "Consciousness is emergent"?

    • @cstorer36
      @cstorer36 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peterpanino2436 that consciousness is not a fundamental part of the universe.

    • @kos-mos1127
      @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peterpanino2436 Consciousness is a collection of phenomenon. An example is H2O. Individually an H2O molecule is not wet but a collection of H2O molecules has the property of wetness.

    • @Ppstate32
      @Ppstate32 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cstorer36 consciousness is not emergent. No one claims it is, since it cannot be proven - because it is untrue

  • @reinholdmathuni5134
    @reinholdmathuni5134 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is there never a date of recording of the interview on this channel? Bad practice

    • @lesselp
      @lesselp ปีที่แล้ว

      Time is relative

  • @marishkagrayson
    @marishkagrayson ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems to me the brain must be processing information quantum mechanically to be able to arrive at solutions, i.e “thinking” is a quantum mechanical process, rather than classical information processing.

  • @williamzame3708
    @williamzame3708 ปีที่แล้ว

    The time dilation effect is noticeable on earth: satellite GPS has to account for it.

  • @-nxu
    @-nxu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Messi of physics 🇦🇷

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon ปีที่แล้ว

    Nothing is going faster than the speed of light. That’s nonsensical. It’s just that space is expanded between each of the galaxies where there is no matter to dilate distance.

  • @kos-mos1127
    @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว

    Parmenides was right when he said that change and distance was an illusion. Reality is an eternal unchanging unity.

  • @ahmadthoha5616
    @ahmadthoha5616 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:15 quantum information

  • @gr33nDestiny
    @gr33nDestiny ปีที่แล้ว

    This was enjoyable to watch. It’s tempting to think that consciousness delves into quantum computation even when you know it’s be should be described via networks

  • @sombh1971
    @sombh1971 ปีที่แล้ว

    He looks so bright that it's almost brilliant.

  • @jacksoned7650
    @jacksoned7650 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quantum s is the most beautiful science.

  • @KaliFissure
    @KaliFissure ปีที่แล้ว

    QM is mysterious strange and confusing because it's a deeply flawed model. A more Bohmian fluid flow full on Maxwellian model will evolve, is evolving.
    The simplest thing any present physicist can do is to regard the entire probability sphere of the photon to be an actual physical thing. A spherical implosion shockwave expanding at c from point of origin.
    The entire sphere is a singular connected object and so any modification to any point on that different effects the entirety. Entanglement.
    An electron drops orbital, space rushes in, creating laminar flows. The exterior surface is always divergent, negative charge. The interior surface is always convergent, positive charge.

  • @A.--.
    @A.--. ปีที่แล้ว

    I still don't get the balloon expanding analogy. If the universe is on the surface of the balloon (as Islam usually drawn) what does the air inside balloon represent?

    • @michael7v6
      @michael7v6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t think there is anything in the balloon for this analogy.

    • @A.--.
      @A.--. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michael7v6 so how is universe 3D if we live only on a surface? And why does cosmic web image show a 3D Swiss cheese appearing structure?

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s curved time *AND* distance.

  • @robertwilsoniii2048
    @robertwilsoniii2048 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bet it's worm holes that are the hidden variables.

  • @Evolutiontweaked
    @Evolutiontweaked ปีที่แล้ว

    This is all nice to know but it doesn't help us avoid meteorites or asteroids from obliterating us, or how to terraform Mars so we can get millions off earth. So in actuality none of this matters because we're not going to live long enough to figure it all out. We need to figure out how to survive so we can concludes our begginings.

  • @javierderivero9299
    @javierderivero9299 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations Argentinians he is a future nobel prize winner

  • @PrinceBlake
    @PrinceBlake ปีที่แล้ว

    9:35 "Let's imagine the simplest of possible space-times..." Eric Weinstein describes its metric emerging from a spinor's 'chimeric" (pronounced 'kimeric') bundle. Kumiko Krchnak describes it as conflation between expanding and orbital paths. In 1888 Andrew Gray called it 'qkk' a single unit of charge on page 42 of his work, "Absolute Measurements in Electricity and Magnetism". In subsequent pages he offers a surface area integral to describe how the measure of the surface reflects the measure enclosed by it. Black hole investigations probe at this quantum aspect of the surface through Leonard Susskind's work among others. So where is it all leading? Of the three spacetime "possibilities" is progress to be found in the negative space curvature, the positive space curvature or the simplest, flat spacetime model where, according to Maldacena, "nothing is expanding, nothing is contracting"? Juan, if you are reading this, my wife Kumiko Krchnak stumbled upon a Rosetta Stone on our honeymoon in the Alamo garden which sought to reconcile the vastly different timelines of East and West into one common bond, a band of brothers, if you will, men united as brothers, not divided, in their respect for honor and courage in battle. These words, Kimeric bundle, band of brothers, common bonds, resonate with my wife's work and only hours ago I parked blindly at WalMart, my go-to store only stare at yet another '935' plate on the car in front of me. I say "another" because I've been seeing a lot of these plates ever since my wife noticed a likeness between '935' and her name "Kumiko" within Japanese numbers Kyu, Mittsu, and Go, 9, 3 things and 5. The plate is BND 935. Juan, I beg you to consider that the simplest flat spacetime model might indeed be ever-expanding in one path and orbital in its other path and the combined paths are what give rise to the dipole moment suspected in every subatomic particle. Please, a lot is at stake. Too many lives have already been lost due to the lack of recognition that things are much more predictable than we ever realized thanks to quantum predictability. We can save lives based on this new understanding of spacetime.

  • @alikarimi-langroodi5402
    @alikarimi-langroodi5402 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is quantum so mysterious?
    th-cam.com/video/nZXrsGL1pgI/w-d-xo.html
    The reason is because we don't know protons well.

    Even if we find out how protons behave, it would not help us find out why it was designed 'weird'.

    This is not unlike how humans behave. We know how they behave under some circumstances, but to rule them to behave how we like them to behave is something else we have no clue of.

    The beauty of behaviour of any organ is in the design, be it we are desperate to rule nature.

    We have not invented nature, so why should we rule nature?

    We invented Windows, we therefore know how to change its behaviour too. But with nature, you will be out of your mind to try to change its behaviour.

  • @davidrandell2224
    @davidrandell2224 ปีที่แล้ว

    QM classicalized in 2010: Juliana Mortenson website Forgotten Physics uncovers the ‘hidden variables’ and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Planck, Einstein, Debroglie,Bohr. Oh well the best brains wrong again. SR wrong due to reference frame mixing and bad math. Such rot passes for knowledge.

  • @kallianpublico7517
    @kallianpublico7517 ปีที่แล้ว

    Space and time are ultimately a way of communicating. Communicating in such a way as to convey that both parties are talking about the same thing. Space and time are used to unify linguistic consciousness otherwise known as self-consciousness.
    Physicists have taken this linguistic tool and sought to apply it to consciousness. To what end? To gain a better understanding of Nature? Or to gain a better understanding of themselves: their brains - the organ of time.
    Will QM give us a better understanding of Nature, or just a "better" way to perceive Nature? Will Nature bend its knee to us, or will we learn to better, bend our knee to Nature?

  • @donnacabot3550
    @donnacabot3550 ปีที่แล้ว

    E(J)=mc2

  • @TheTroofSayer
    @TheTroofSayer ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a mystery because the unknown is inherently mysterious. And the whole of existence, beginning with the void, is an expression of the relationship between the known & the unknown. This relationship begins in the innocence of birth for all creatures, when they confront their unknowns for the first time. It explains their sexualities & gender roles, with the mysterious male & nurturing female. It extends into evolution, invention & discovery, and the interface between the cultural known & the unknown. *Knowing how to be* (e.g., in culture) is a thing because it provides the top-down that interfaces with the bottom-up, to manifest our knowns as "reality".

  • @theophilus749
    @theophilus749 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I suspect that the weirdness of QM is more to do with the fact that, at that level, we can only understand the world mathematically. All other ways of understanding become impossible. All the supposedly 'helpful' pictures and animations become at worse useless and even at best misleading. So called 'classical' situations can be described mathematically _and_ in other ways (non-weird and picureable) but not quantum situations (weird and non-picturable).

  • @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve
    @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve ปีที่แล้ว

    I find it interesting that English is Juan’s second language it would seem. Yet he is easier to understand than 95% of the so-called professionals out there.

  • @maxpower252
    @maxpower252 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought the smartest Argentine was Messi… I didn’t know about this dude.

  • @zacharybennett3249
    @zacharybennett3249 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are they sitting like that? Are they gonna kiss? Someone send me the timestamp

  • @S3RAVA3LM
    @S3RAVA3LM ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Has quantum mechanics acknowledged: Divinity, Virtue, Intellect, Form, Soul, Light, Being, Consciousness, Order, Emanation, Actual, Potiential, Aether, Meaning, Good, Evil, Imagination?
    I don't study quantum, I study Metaphysics, Theology, and I Philosophize. I'm an aspirant of the Ancients: Egyptians, Indians, Greeks.
    People enjoy disrespecting me here when I comment, so perhaps you could inform me about the contradictory mechanic of Quantum?

  • @maxwellsimoes238
    @maxwellsimoes238 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not so sure he describes quanta mechanic are Universe expand. First Theory quanta are underminimg particles. If it are RIGHT how particles quanta describes Universe expand? Guys are underminimg phich by his false hipotesy.

  • @theobolt250
    @theobolt250 ปีที่แล้ว

    So you explain time dilution. Then be more forthcoming, please! Mention also the magnitude of this difference. If I'm not mistaken it is more then 10 positions behind the decimal point. So small that it's not noticable, with exeption of very special equipment. Makes it a whole lot LESS mysterious! Goofballs!

  • @philcarter2362
    @philcarter2362 ปีที่แล้ว

    Frankly, this seems like a whole lot of hand waving,

  • @animalbird9436
    @animalbird9436 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because peoples livelyhoods depend on them telling u so.xxand lets not forget fame and funding..PHYSICS..its broken..fancy a cherry pick ov data or make up a question to a solution u found ..haha..or hows about doing calculations using hidden variables..ie guesses...plz excuse me but i could go on and on and on.....i know...i already have🤣🤣

  • @Kostly
    @Kostly ปีที่แล้ว

    bashing material into material isn't it. lol

  • @ujjwalbhattarai8670
    @ujjwalbhattarai8670 ปีที่แล้ว

    Relativity and quantum theory are wrong.

    • @kos-mos1127
      @kos-mos1127 ปีที่แล้ว

      Relativity and quantum theory are incomplete not wrong.

    • @ujjwalbhattarai8670
      @ujjwalbhattarai8670 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kos-mos1127
      It is completely wrong about universe.

  • @mikel4879
    @mikel4879 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is mysterious because it is a completely wrong theory.
    When mathematicians take care of reality, that's the stupidity you get.
    Reality is not counterintuitive at all. Stupidity is.

    • @ChechoColombia1
      @ChechoColombia1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wrong? The PC that you have is possible thanks to QM.

    • @S3RAVA3LM
      @S3RAVA3LM ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChechoColombia1 well, if it weren't for God there'd be no, what your kinds calls QM.
      QM didn't create anything.

    • @ChechoColombia1
      @ChechoColombia1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@S3RAVA3LM Mm QM is a physical and mathematical description of the world, it can be test by many ways because physics is an empirical science. Im sorry but there is no evidence of the existence of a god that can be test.

    • @mikel4879
      @mikel4879 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sergio M / The computer works due to "QM"? 😂🤣😂
      This is exactly an ignorant phrase!
      You presuppose a phantasmagoric notion without even knowing first what an electron is in reality. Not in theory. In REALITY!
      Ask any scientist out there, the ones that you think are the brightest with "No-bells" useless prizes, and see if they know what an electron is in REALITY.

    • @mikel4879
      @mikel4879 ปีที่แล้ว

      Several / Here you go again with the voodoo god notion! 🤣

  • @draganmirkovic9377
    @draganmirkovic9377 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because its very interesting story for kids and dumb people.