satisfying? why? cheater doesnt care. He made account same day and he can make another next day. It's annoying that they allow new accounts to play in tournaments. Eric is right
@@brunokocinas1635 Chess is about pattern recognition more than anything, and this epecially starts kicking in above 1000 elo. Get that intelligence bullshit outta here. The first time playing there is absolutely no way you wont blunder if you're playing an experienced 1200.
I think they should restrict by account age as well. Maybe have a 30 day account age minimum to deter most cheaters. Also, accounts rated over 2000, especially those in the titled rating range, should be highly scrutinized by anti cheating programs. I think often they go undetected because no one reports them.
@@dominusdone5023 . You won't be playing 96% accuracy against GMs, much less top rated GMs like Eric. I believe Eric is usually in the top 5 or top 10 of chesscom rankings. There are obviously only a handful of players in the world that can play that well against Eric. My point being that accuracy is largely dependent on your opponent's moves.
With the second one that's the nature of engines. At low depth even in winning positions it will recommend the same moves because it doesn't look for 3 fold.
@@DragonBank I don't think it is true. Chess engines are programmed to avoid draw in a winning position. This looks to me more like the user took over in those last moves ... but of course I lack the info ..
They ruined his tournament and tilted him. How is that a good job when he can't concentrate on his game because now he's worried about more cheaters making him second guess his moves??
@@pk-fi1ok Nah I've analysed my games before and the engine often says I made a mistake sacking a piece and playing for the win and instead recommends I repeat moves for a draw.
Maybe your cheater opponent had remors about you in the fact you are not a grand master, i think the cheaters chess players are jalous and vendictive persons towards the grand master
When somebody is winning by that much, you know they are cheating if they ask for a draw. They only ask for a draw against people as good as Eric because they know the game is going to come down to time and they won't be able to rely on their own skills to save them.
EH: Please take a seat. Cheater: Oh, hi, I didn't know you were here. EH: Were you expecting someone else? The one who you have been challenging for a chess game? They did tell you their ELO, right? Cheater: I can't... I can't remember. Yeah, I think they said their ELO was over 1800. EH: I have the transcript of your invitation right here. It clearly says that the ELO of your opponent was not even 1300, and that you were aware of this. Cheater: I don't remember that, maybe, I forgot. EH: Oh, and did you also forgot that you, and I quote, "want to backrank checkmate them with the white rook". And here you ask how if they have already played Arena Kings, and if they would be willing to play their first game with you. Your opponent asks if their low ELO is not a problem for you, and you said "I don't mind, lol". What's in the bag, so you actually brought the chess board with you? Cheater: I'm so sorry, what's going to happen to me? Am I under arrest? EH: That's not up to me. I'm GM Eric Hansen, and I am making a youtube video for chessbrah.
2:40 "I should've played c3, I misplayed that." Literally every move I've ever made. I see why it was bad the second I make it, no matter how long I think about it. Lol.
Some time ago I played a very obvious cheater who didn’t even take free pieces if not after 5 seconds time. I called him out and he pointed me as a sore loser. 3 days later that infant was banned, boy how was I glad
Hello! Are you the same Fritzi that plays on chesscom?? I think I played a couple games against you in bullet (I'm roughly 2000 on chesscom) and you demolished me like I just started playing the day before. You demolished everyone else too of course. The event was tournament for Tothkincso. Are you a GM by any chance?
7:20 i love when i see cheaters playing all by themselves because they are in time trouble and they can’t use no more engines, it really shows how trash and stupid they are! Kooo
*"there so many suspicious fuckers in this tournament"* yeah it sucks and there have been lots of abusers and new accounts which is stupid and should be stopped cause it just allows more of these people to pop up again and again which is annoying and i totally agree with you that its just idiotic on why they dont stop that
To me it’s more than just shitty morals. What kind of sad sack, no life person goes and plays a chess tournament and uses an engine? What is the point? I don’t understand how that is even the slightest bit fun
The only thing i can think is they delude themselves into thinking they just have an engine on for analysis or learning purposes, when really theyre using it to confirm every move and avoid any blunders. Otherwise what is the point? it's a boardgame what possible reason could you have for playing at all if you are going to use an engine
Trolling essentially. And chess is quite unique with its ability for anyone to cheat against anyone with relative ease. It probably gives these people great satisfaction to beat these top level guys even if it isn’t legit.
@@XzVanQuisHzX But they didnt beat them, everyone knows engines beat humans, so what point are they proving? i just cant put myself into their heads, is it hoping the player just thinks theyre really strong? Is that useful somehow to you? When you know you aren't? They're always on anonymous accounts too for obvious reasons, so what glory is there in beating anyone?
@@jimmierustler5607 My friends a psychologist and he explained his view like this, he assumes that cheaters in chess are similar to cheaters in other avenues of sports etc. In that they believe personally they are contributing to getting victories over the other player, they disassociate with the fact that they are artificially gaining an advantage over their opponents because they arent even equating the means of getting an advantage, with beating their opponent. It's an elaborate variant of cognitive dissonance basically.
@@jimmierustler5607 I suppose even though they’re not beating them legit , it still gives them satisfaction to be on the winning side against these top GMs. All of these guys are probably bad players and frustrated with the game , having the temptation to throw an engine on and beat anybody in the world is too much to abstain from. Add in anonymity to that and it makes it completely risk free. There’s probably a deep level of psychology that explains all this in regards to trolling, cheating, etc.
Chess.com has a serious problem with cheaters I reported two people in the last week and chess.com did nothing. These cheaters are ranging from 1000 rating to 1900 rating. The worst was the 1000 rated player who beat me when i was 1700 in a tournament and his moves were 98% accurate and chess.com did nothing. The cheater followed the computer line with 25 excellent moves to my measly 13 or 14. Although it was not a new account; there were definitely the 90%+ accuracy games against players 5 to 700 ELO points higher than him or her. Very obvious, this person is a cheater; but chess.com did nothing. Another was a 1800 rated player that went 99% and followed the computer line to the T in the mid to late game with a 99.7% accuracy. There was even the proverbial pause after the game started when a cheater turns on their engine. After that moves came so fast in a 3 min game. i reported this person and chess.com did nothing. I am so fed up of chess.com and their inaction that I cancelled my membership. Cant support a site that is built on ignorance
Most cheaters get banned within a week. I agree with Eric, they shouldn't allow new accounts to join the tournament and ruin the experience. Imo they should add a rule where only accounts that are 1 week or older are allowed to participate. Anyone else think this would be a good idea?
On lichess you have to play X amount of rated games in each time control before you join its respective tournament, this is definitely needed on chess.com if you get that many cheaters lol
I think I have a fetish for cheater who run low on time and have to stop using their engine, and go from playing like a 3000 elo player to blundering 10 times in a row
2 seconds for Nd7 after e4-e5. Then he plays b6 and needs another to second to play Bb7 the next move. It's great that so many cheaters are really bad chess players, I'm afraid 2300+ players would be much more difficult to catch, if they did it well.
Smurfing is when a highly-skilled player creates a secondary account as a disguise to play against less proficient opponents. This almost always results in the Smurf steamrolling their lower-level adversaries, which might be hilarious for the better player but usually leaves their victims bitter.
There is no point of cheating, some people do it because they like to feel what playing like a GM is, i suppose, i mean that guy, even tho he was cheating he beat jobava, i bet he will feel so proud about that, every game that allow some sort of cheating it’s 100% sure someone will cheat, and im not talking only about chess, the other day i wanted to play again after several years an old Call of duty (2009 released) on my ps3 and i still met several players cheating, i mean, they were cheating on a 2009 multiplayer game on 2021... they are just piece of shit as the one we met in chess
@@Pauliex33 but they cheat on blitz too, a lot...lately it seems like i play a cheater in 1 every 5 matches. Always the best move, keeps disconnecting, gets flagged when has mate in 2 because doesnt know what to do, etc
It is impossible to tell exactly, but if Stockfish 13 or even mediocre engine (mediocre in the comparison between the best engines) would play against Deep Blue, they would have an easy day. Era in 90s and 00s was peculiar in chess between man vs. computer, because on those times it was not evident, which one is stronger. In early 90s the best humans were better and in late 00s the engines had surpassed them. Deep Blue won Kasparov 1997, but engines usable in normal PC probably reached the same level in the next decade. In about 25 years human chess players have not developed nearly as much as engines (if they have developed at all, it is partly with the help of computers). Now there is no match, because it would be like man running against horse. For Deep Blue it would be the same treatment. Alpha Zero showed us few years ago new realms of chess, and now neural network is making the best engines even better. So, the difference to the times of Deep Blue is huge.
Elo is a mess right now like its really bad in general specially around the 1000 level omg. I use to never get games felt like they were more rigged then I do now days
White is down a pawn. This will affect the endgame when all the pieces (queen, rook, bishop, knight) get trade off. Plus White has doubled pawns which will make promoting both harder
"draw? What do you think I am, a charity?"
3 seconds later
"Wait I missed your draw offer"
He literally doesn't care
Haha
pretty sure he was mocking his draw drama with hikario
The Hikaru sportsmanship award
@@user-zj7rw3rz8i his drawma you mean? Lol
It's pooja's alternative accounts 😂
He's been playing chess for his whole life but she won't stop taking all of his pieces :(
She’s back to step on his chest
@@hauntworld22 😂
@@hauntworld22 with those stilettos
LOLLLL
I am waiting for Hansen to say to a cheater: "Why don't you have a seat, right over there."
What were you expecting to happen here?
I’m just here to make a move, I swear.
I swear, there wasn't going to be any mating going on
"You're free to close the browser"
Seeing the account closed screen is always so frickin satisfying
satisfying? why? cheater doesnt care. He made account same day and he can make another next day. It's annoying that they allow new accounts to play in tournaments. Eric is right
@@NoskYTB I know but its not really a problem. There are many tricks
I don't know why, but i sometimes scroll my archieve games Just to spot some closed accounts. It happens. There's a lot of weasels out there.
@@andreitiberiovicgazdovici May I ask what rating and time control you're refering to?
@@Mukki.Berlin ?
Dude these online cheater videos are my favorite. Watching eric stare at the screen and question how a 600 ELO guy knows theory will never get old
they cant catch my c++ bot
"What are you? 440 pounds? 450?" :'D
That cracked me up
Into tears...
Ahahahahahaha
400 pounds* 8:01
can anyone explain what that means?
@@sanjeevkhurana6628 If you're not trolling, biggest in size. a 450 pound person would be quite large.
When you're a 3000 for the first 2 and a half minutes and an 800 in the last 30 seconds....
Lmao
well that averages out his rating to 2300, simple chessmath
Most of the cheaters wouldn't even get to an 800 rating lol.
@@PHeMoX nah depending on how smart you are you can get to 1200 the first time you play by just not blundering
@@brunokocinas1635 Chess is about pattern recognition more than anything, and this epecially starts kicking in above 1000 elo. Get that intelligence bullshit outta here. The first time playing there is absolutely no way you wont blunder if you're playing an experienced 1200.
Playing 2 cheaters.Still getting 1,5/2 points against them.Pure skill right there.
i wasn't cheating your boy just salty
@@ideservesomehappinessinmyl5500 nah it was definitely cheating tf you talking about
@UCSRwviUGaywdNAp44Cnnwfg huh? Buddy was playing top engine moves and got banned how is that not cheating
@@eliwilliams2825 first game those moves wasn't engine moves and your boy know that i was just defending great he was salty and get me banned its okay
@@ideservesomehappinessinmyl5500 ???
Why don't they restrict arena kings and other arenas by account age? Or games played.
I think they should restrict by account age as well. Maybe have a 30 day account age minimum to deter most cheaters. Also, accounts rated over 2000, especially those in the titled rating range, should be highly scrutinized by anti cheating programs. I think often they go undetected because no one reports them.
@@dominusdone5023 well are you? 😂
@@samuelsteiner3854 no? You can easily get high accuracies if you punish your opponent for playing bad moves
@@dominusdone5023 . You won't be playing 96% accuracy against GMs, much less top rated GMs like Eric. I believe Eric is usually in the top 5 or top 10 of chesscom rankings. There are obviously only a handful of players in the world that can play that well against Eric. My point being that accuracy is largely dependent on your opponent's moves.
@@staypositive4358 you just agreed with him.
In the 2nd game, aligantorz had 95 accuracy while eric had 97.3 accuracy. It's crazy how eric is better than the weak engine
Hes not
The guy probably mixed in some of his own moves with the engine recommendations.
"Weak"
"...probably tilted him off the Earth." xd
Finally a GM confirms flat earth YEP
aCkShUaLlY tHe eArTh iS rOuNd
@@baxterbotox7661 nooo it's triangular
I swear Eric and Chris Hansen are related
Are you also related to them?
Same
I think you are their lost long brother.
@@Thelaretus its the chessbrah fans bro
Eric: Takes on f7
Martin K4: Danger
4:01
Lmaoooo
Yeah I noticed it too, pretty good timing :D
Man, in every case, you flagged one and drew another one. I consider it as a good job. I mean f**ng good job!
With the second one that's the nature of engines. At low depth even in winning positions it will recommend the same moves because it doesn't look for 3 fold.
@@DragonBank I don't think it is true. Chess engines are programmed to avoid draw in a winning position. This looks to me more like the user took over in those last moves ... but of course I lack the info ..
They ruined his tournament and tilted him. How is that a good job when he can't concentrate on his game because now he's worried about more cheaters making him second guess his moves??
@@pk-fi1ok Nah I've analysed my games before and the engine often says I made a mistake sacking a piece and playing for the win and instead recommends I repeat moves for a draw.
@@jackholmes1035 i think that just means sacking the piece made you losing which an engine would never suggest
Already know from the intro it’s gonna be a banger. Keep up the good work Eric, you deserve the best.
Chris Hansen, Eric Hansen. This is they way.
Just take a seat cheater, just take a seat right over there
Eric is such a good guy he doesn’t deserve to be cheated this much
3:27
"Ah s**t, here we go again."
the opponent prolly doesn't care
Bro seeing Erick beat a cheater will always be damn impressive
its actually amazing his ability to know immediately and be correct.
Not really.
They're allowing new accounts on purpose, so eric does the work for them :P
it's actually incredibly impressive how well you hang in against stockfish.
"To catch a cheater with Eric Hansen. " Brilliant.
I've had cheaters offer me a draw when they were in a much better position, seems to be a common thing they do.
Some sort of brain disease of sorts.
Then you take the draw and run 🏃♂️
Maybe that's how they keep their rating low and their account off the radar. What's your rating?
Maybe your cheater opponent had remors about you in the fact you are not a grand master, i think the cheaters chess players are jalous and vendictive persons towards the grand master
They do that so they don't get the points so their rating stays relatively low to avoid getting caught
When somebody is winning by that much, you know they are cheating if they ask for a draw. They only ask for a draw against people as good as Eric because they know the game is going to come down to time and they won't be able to rely on their own skills to save them.
Eric: "Why don't you have a seat over there."
Cheater: sir pls
Eric: "What are you doing here tonight?"
Eric is freaking hilarious when he's mad 😄🤣
I got to go.. or something.. peepoLeave
So nice :D To catch a cheater! :D You guys are the best
It's probably indonesian.
0:10 the bar only shifts that extremely if a blunder was played by the guy with an advantage. And there were a minimum of four blunders total there.
8:25 "my eyes hurt, what are you doing?" I love you eric :)
"You're my biggest fan?"
"What are you 400 pounds? 450?"
AYO WTF? No way he just did that?
I love how with this video the music in the background is saying “DANGER ... DANGER”
Do you know the name of the music track?
Oh, I know who you are Eric Hansen, but see I calls you Eric Handsome
Should do a series like 24. Things like this don't get fixed overnight.
Please be careful, Eric!
Don't expose a cheater if they are from Indonesia, or your life will be hell. apparently is a country full of Super GMs
What's your point
Dude you're late af
@@7cmhg840 this isn't a livestream
Why would life be hell to expose cheaters from Indonesia?
@@carpetclimber4027 levy "exposed" an Indonesian acc, turns out it was a real player and he was banned
EH: Please take a seat.
Cheater: Oh, hi, I didn't know you were here.
EH: Were you expecting someone else? The one who you have been challenging for a chess game? They did tell you their ELO, right?
Cheater: I can't... I can't remember. Yeah, I think they said their ELO was over 1800.
EH: I have the transcript of your invitation right here. It clearly says that the ELO of your opponent was not even 1300, and that you were aware of this.
Cheater: I don't remember that, maybe, I forgot.
EH: Oh, and did you also forgot that you, and I quote, "want to backrank checkmate them with the white rook". And here you ask how if they have already played Arena Kings, and if they would be willing to play their first game with you. Your opponent asks if their low ELO is not a problem for you, and you said "I don't mind, lol". What's in the bag, so you actually brought the chess board with you?
Cheater: I'm so sorry, what's going to happen to me? Am I under arrest?
EH: That's not up to me. I'm GM Eric Hansen, and I am making a youtube video for chessbrah.
gold :)
Confusing episode but a great one
...A-are there going to be mods outside this door closing my account for violating the Fair Play Policy?
@@romanray3847 that’s not up to me
Lmaooo i like how it contrasts 'To catch a predator with Chris Hansen' lul
first dude literally moved a piece every 3 seconds
2:40 "I should've played c3, I misplayed that."
Literally every move I've ever made. I see why it was bad the second I make it, no matter how long I think about it. Lol.
13:26 When they came for Jobava, we came for their HEADS
No one messes with the exotic princess
I suggest creating a title for those who get caught cheating: GW, grandwanker!
Some time ago I played a very obvious cheater who didn’t even take free pieces if not after 5 seconds time. I called him out and he pointed me as a sore loser. 3 days later that infant was banned, boy how was I glad
Eric complained about it our whole game. Unfortunately I wasn't able to use this as I complained about some other stuff during the game myself. :D
Arena kings causes lots of complaining for everyone involved 🤣
Hello! Are you the same Fritzi that plays on chesscom?? I think I played a couple games against you in bullet (I'm roughly 2000 on chesscom) and you demolished me like I just started playing the day before. You demolished everyone else too of course. The event was tournament for Tothkincso. Are you a GM by any chance?
@@staypositive4358 i like to play some kamikaze lines, which mostly work in blitz games, but not otb.
Complained about what if i may ask?
@@faznaz7455 lag problems
That draw situation could have turned sour, good job on communicating well and making sure that didn't happen
7:20 i love when i see cheaters playing all by themselves because they are in time trouble and they can’t use no more engines, it really shows how trash and stupid they are! Kooo
A year ago chess.com was fun. My chess rating went down from 1385 to 1085 because of this shit and I play everyday
@@sk818factory5 how that happened?!
@@MiSTeRJoKe96 too many cheaters on chess.com since chess started blowing up. It’s a joke
@@MiSTeRJoKe96 now when I play I open the profile and if the account isn’t at least a year old I just abort the game
I love how at 8:40 Eric sounded he was just pleading with this dude not to cheat
Eric: why did you come here
Suspect: she told me we could play chess
Every cheater's gangsta until Eric shows up
So basically Levy's program but better and avoid any kind of confrontations that leads to drama? Sign me up
Except levy was just unlucky because he accused someone who happened to have a huge fanbase
@@giannisr.7733 *blind fanbase, also everyone agrees that guy cheated
The Levy drama was hilarious, it's time to admit it
@@Chakkaly These Indonesians fans made it 100 times better with their nonsense, I had a good laugh
*"there so many suspicious fuckers in this tournament"* yeah it sucks and there have been lots of abusers and new accounts which is stupid and should be stopped cause it just allows more of these people to pop up again and again which is annoying and i totally agree with you that its just idiotic on why they dont stop that
Cheating is rampart on the net. It just shows us the moral level of today's society.
To me it’s more than just shitty morals. What kind of sad sack, no life person goes and plays a chess tournament and uses an engine? What is the point? I don’t understand how that is even the slightest bit fun
*rampant
I wish i was good enough to keep a cheater from winning until there's mere seconds remaining on their clock. Very impressive win Eric !
Eric won by timeout and got a Draw playing against machine's assistance. That's my friend is how strong Eric is playing clean on the board.
The only thing i can think is they delude themselves into thinking they just have an engine on for analysis or learning purposes, when really theyre using it to confirm every move and avoid any blunders. Otherwise what is the point? it's a boardgame what possible reason could you have for playing at all if you are going to use an engine
Trolling essentially. And chess is quite unique with its ability for anyone to cheat against anyone with relative ease. It probably gives these people great satisfaction to beat these top level guys even if it isn’t legit.
@@XzVanQuisHzX But they didnt beat them, everyone knows engines beat humans, so what point are they proving? i just cant put myself into their heads, is it hoping the player just thinks theyre really strong? Is that useful somehow to you? When you know you aren't? They're always on anonymous accounts too for obvious reasons, so what glory is there in beating anyone?
@@jimmierustler5607 My friends a psychologist and he explained his view like this, he assumes that cheaters in chess are similar to cheaters in other avenues of sports etc. In that they believe personally they are contributing to getting victories over the other player, they disassociate with the fact that they are artificially gaining an advantage over their opponents because they arent even equating the means of getting an advantage, with beating their opponent. It's an elaborate variant of cognitive dissonance basically.
@@tomsnow2872 Makes sense
@@jimmierustler5607 I suppose even though they’re not beating them legit , it still gives them satisfaction to be on the winning side against these top GMs. All of these guys are probably bad players and frustrated with the game , having the temptation to throw an engine on and beat anybody in the world is too much to abstain from. Add in anonymity to that and it makes it completely risk free. There’s probably a deep level of psychology that explains all this in regards to trolling, cheating, etc.
Nothing compares to winning a good game on your own.
Me not knowing what arena Kings are:
I too would lose it if this happened to me
“Take a seat”-Eric
Chess.com has a serious problem with cheaters
I reported two people in the last week and chess.com did nothing.
These cheaters are ranging from 1000 rating to 1900 rating.
The worst was the 1000 rated player who beat me when i was 1700 in a tournament and his moves were 98% accurate and chess.com did nothing. The cheater followed the computer line with 25 excellent moves to my measly 13 or 14. Although it was not a new account; there were definitely the 90%+ accuracy games against players 5 to 700 ELO points higher than him or her. Very obvious, this person is a cheater; but chess.com did nothing.
Another was a 1800 rated player that went 99% and followed the computer line to the T in the mid to late game with a 99.7% accuracy. There was even the proverbial pause after the game started when a cheater turns on their engine. After that moves came so fast in a 3 min game. i reported this person and chess.com did nothing.
I am so fed up of chess.com and their inaction that I cancelled my membership. Cant support a site that is built on ignorance
Agree 100%!
Lmao you have the perfect name for this
Someday I hope to be good enough to know what a weird move looks like
“Ooh... Something happened there, something happened, I don’t know what” me every time I I blunder a queen
8:01 "What are you... 400lbs?" LOL
Hey, on the upside, at least you drew an engine cheater.
“What are you 400lbs???” 😂
😆
Why don't you take a seat? What did you bring the fork and skewer for?
“I’m going to get harassed quite a bit in the future.” He has no idea...
Chris hansen would be proud
Most cheaters get banned within a week. I agree with Eric, they shouldn't allow new accounts to join the tournament and ruin the experience. Imo they should add a rule where only accounts that are 1 week or older are allowed to participate. Anyone else think this would be a good idea?
I second that
that will only work for one arena kings. next week the people with 1 week old accounts will infest the tourney anyways
"Danger" playing in the background.
I see what you did there.
nice.
2:19 and if g5? Bishop trapped or some counter attack?
New accounts should NOT be allowed to play in tournaments.
Agreed!
He was beating the shit out of me, then he was playing like a 1200 - LOLOLOLOL
Chess sites : Having cheaters and hackers in their sites
Chess TH-camrs : CONTENT !!!!!!!
"Pooja, take a seat"
2:53
Call out Rensch directly to fix the tourney eligibilty
The first one was obvious based off him being 2400 blitz but having a 21 puzzle rush best
The intro is lit
Hard not to feel really bad for Eric here
On lichess you have to play X amount of rated games in each time control before you join its respective tournament, this is definitely needed on chess.com if you get that many cheaters lol
omg...when they need 2 secs per move already in the opening like in the first game
tilts me so much when eric knows the guy is cheating and lets his time run down when its so easy to flag. just survive for 10 moves and you win
I think I have a fetish for cheater who run low on time and have to stop using their engine, and go from playing like a 3000 elo player to blundering 10 times in a row
2 seconds for Nd7 after e4-e5. Then he plays b6 and needs another to second to play Bb7 the next move. It's great that so many cheaters are really bad chess players, I'm afraid 2300+ players would be much more difficult to catch, if they did it well.
I just found this channel and these videos are so funny and obviously the chess content is great
Some irony. How quickly we forget.
12:50 when eric plays among us
I missed the draw offer....hahahahhaa
The to catch a cheater edit at the beginning was brilliant
The personality difference between Eric and Aman is like the Grand Canyon. "you're by biggest fan, what are you 400-450?" WTF?
It was an hilarious joke, but I do hope his biggest fan have a good sense of humor haha
@@alexandrekilburg302 not based on one comment but months of watching them.
I wish they could FINE shady people like that, would bring $$$ to the chess site and dissuade such nonsense!
How does that kind of music fit so well to chess? I am not sure what to do anymore
Smurfing is when a highly-skilled player creates a secondary account as a disguise to play against less proficient opponents. This almost always results in the Smurf steamrolling their lower-level adversaries, which might be hilarious for the better player but usually leaves their victims bitter.
So what's the point with cheating? I mean you are only fooling yourself
i believe arena kings have some prize money, thats why there are so many cheaters.. but yeah, i agree, cheating is dumb
There is no point of cheating, some people do it because they like to feel what playing like a GM is, i suppose, i mean that guy, even tho he was cheating he beat jobava, i bet he will feel so proud about that, every game that allow some sort of cheating it’s 100% sure someone will cheat, and im not talking only about chess, the other day i wanted to play again after several years an old Call of duty (2009 released) on my ps3 and i still met several players cheating, i mean, they were cheating on a 2009 multiplayer game on 2021... they are just piece of shit as the one we met in chess
@@Pauliex33 but they cheat on blitz too, a lot...lately it seems like i play a cheater in 1 every 5 matches. Always the best move, keeps disconnecting, gets flagged when has mate in 2 because doesnt know what to do, etc
It's pornographic. Substituted simulation of the actual thrill, without having to put in the actual risks/efforts of the real thing.
Intro: How to catch a cheater
Video: Eric raging to 13 year olds cheating in chess tourneys
It's true they should. They probably weren't aware of creating that rule.
how strong is the best egine now compared to deep blue that casparov played?
It is impossible to tell exactly, but if Stockfish 13 or even mediocre engine (mediocre in the comparison between the best engines) would play against Deep Blue, they would have an easy day.
Era in 90s and 00s was peculiar in chess between man vs. computer, because on those times it was not evident, which one is stronger. In early 90s the best humans were better and in late 00s the engines had surpassed them. Deep Blue won Kasparov 1997, but engines usable in normal PC probably reached the same level in the next decade.
In about 25 years human chess players have not developed nearly as much as engines (if they have developed at all, it is partly with the help of computers). Now there is no match, because it would be like man running against horse. For Deep Blue it would be the same treatment. Alpha Zero showed us few years ago new realms of chess, and now neural network is making the best engines even better. So, the difference to the times of Deep Blue is huge.
Elo is a mess right now like its really bad in general specially around the 1000 level omg. I use to never get games felt like they were more rigged then I do now days
Under 600 ELO here, can someone please tell me why the move at 8:34 (white's one) is so wrong?
White is down a pawn. This will affect the endgame when all the pieces (queen, rook, bishop, knight) get trade off. Plus White has doubled pawns which will make promoting both harder
11:07 why didnt eric just take the bishop with queen?
That's hanging a queen
He can't recapture with the f rook because its pinned