@01:07 the anarcho-syndicalists have the same flag as the anarcho-communists, and the anarchists in spain at the time were syndies. it’s historically accurate to have that flag be the one that’s used. if anyone is interested in learning more about the Spanish Civil War, i recommend you read George Orwell’s “Homage to Catalonia.” It’s his memoir of when he fought against the fascists as a volunteer in the SCW.
Yeah a lot of overlapping with these anarchist ideologies as most syndicalists also want to establish communism as the end goal and typically veiw syndicalism as the method of achieving industrial socialism.
1:08 CNT-FAI (the spanish anarchists) were anarcho-communists. The decision to go with non-aligned is because an anarchist commune and the Soviet Union having the same ideology would make no sense.
@@wiizzpl4718 "As you have probably detected from the above Anarcho-syndicalism is not the same thing as Anarchist Communism. The latter is an Anarchist vision for a post-capitalist society while the former is an Anarchist strategy to achieve such a society. Despite their difference these two ideas and practices have an essential connection. Firstly Anarcho-syndicalists have often been Anarchist Communists and vice versa. Rudolf Rocker, the founding father of Anarcho-syndicalism, was an Anarchist Communist before becoming an Anarcho-syndicalist and argued for an Anarchist Communist society in his book "Anarcho-syndicalism: Theory and Practice". The Anarchist Communist Peter Kropotkin had ideas of labor associations that prefigured Anarcho-syndicalism while the later Russian Anarchist Communists who wrote "The Organizational Platform of Libertarian Communists" advocated "syndicalism as the method" of class struggle. The modern Anarcho-syndicalist international advocates "Libertarian Communism" (another word for Anarchist Communism) as the society it seeks to create. Secondly I want to argue that both ideas and practices need each other." TL:DR; anarcho-syndicalism is how to achieve anarcho-communism.
For the record "Anarcho-Communism" is completely different for what is commonly called "Communism". In general, in common speech and usually in games, "Communism" is refered as an ideology derived from Marxism-Leninism, which has as an ultimate goal to reach "communism", an state in which private property is abolished, but it requires the survival of the state in an intermediate phase. "Anarcho-Communism" was a current of political thought derived from philosophers such as Mikhail Bakunin, Errico Malatesta and Peter Kropotkin, which also has the goal of the abolition of private property, but it dispenses for the need of having a "state" as an intermediate phase, because it completely rejects the state. So, having the "red and black" flag is completely historically accurate, because the flag is also the flag of anarcho-syndicalism, which is a current of anarchism greatly influenced by anarcho-communism (in fact, anarcho-syndicalism is more an organization strategy rather than a different ideology than anarcho-communism)
@@visiblur Anarchism refers to the removal of unjust hierarchy, while the state is included in this it is not the only form of hierarchy which stands to be destroyed
@@this_is_patrick normally, yes. But everyone's quarantined and him included. He and everyone else has much more spare time and I think that pravus likes playing games.
@@this_is_patrick There is no harm in making a request, especially in a respectful enough manner like that, IMO. Pravus can always ignore or deny as he see's fit.
anarcho communists aren't anything like Marxist leninists, and in game the communism ideology is basically just ML. anarcho communism is a very libertarian version of communism, and ML/maoist is very authoritarian. so even though they share a label they're not remotely similar.
@@chocotheminute907 Marx and Lenin were, yes, but Marxist-Leninism is a thing that Stalin came up with. It's just Stalinism. It stomps on the beliefs of marx *and* lenin. It doesn't remove the bourgeoise, it replaces it. The new bourgeoise were the party members who still controlled the proletariat.
I believe Shift+H will have an army train all green units to the next level and stop them there. So you can add units to an army and have it train them without wasting supplies on the other units and without babysitting it to stop once all the units are actually trained.
You are playing the Anarcho-syndicalism Spain as they originated in Catalonia which is where the regional defence council is. So they really didn’t need to make it non aligned but I guess they just decided that it would represent general anarchism.
Well, here's the thing, the big C Communists, or stalinists you might say, in Spain together with the Republicans did do the whole government crackdown thing (with some encouragement from a certain Stalin) on CNT-FAI and the other faction, POUM. Look up what they did to the leader of POUM, Andres Nin.
anarcho-capitalism: "let me cash in my benefits, I need to keep fighting the system!" - "don't you tell me what to do, and get back into the line" ...yeah, it's pretty much still a thing.
I believe Paradox’s argument for non-aligned is those not aligned with the traditional major factions (Comintern, Allies, Axis). It doesn’t necessarily have any correlation to govt type
You couldn't get your ships through the Straight of Gibraltar because 1 you didn't own Gibraltar and 2 you didn't own Spanish North Africa. You could have moved the ships at any time after you controlled Gibraltar.
Pravus, they probably used the anarcho-communist flag because most anarchists are communists or syndicalists. Most people aren't just "destroy the state" and nothing else.
The Anarcho-Communist flag is because the Spanish Anarchists were technically "Anarcho-Communists", their idea of an ideal society revolved around common ownership and redistribution of wealth equally in a libertine society.
Marx seeked that an authoritarian state to implement the dictatorship of the proletariat and then slowly work to create global communism. Basically create a very powerful authoritarian state in the name of state socialism and then dismantle it(somehow?) In the name of communism. Creating anarchy with a state in a few words. Anarcho communists on the other hand says that a revolution done by the state is meant to fail and the dictatorship of the proletariat will only lead to the creation of a new ruling class and therefore they seek to to create libertarian socialism without a transition state and just abolish the state and capitalism completely all at once. Another key difference is that while Marxists(Orthodox Marxists) seek to establish global communism through state socialism , Anarcho communists seek to simply create anarchy and libertarian socialism and then have communism as simply one of the many different stateless anti capitalist forms of organization different anarchist communities can voluntarily choose to have. The other forms being syndicalism, collectivism, mutualism etc. So yeah that's the difference between Anarcho communism and Orthodox Marxism.
Hmmmm the text for ending the Civil war indicates the forming of communes, so this is, in fact, communists anarchism.... so why is it not part of the communist faction?
Because the "communist" in hoi 4 are almost always stalinist, witch search to archive a totalitarian form of state capitalism, when the anarco syndicalist (the spanish cnt fai witch pravus is doing the gameplay) tries to archive a stateless, moneyless and classless society where the workes controls the means of production. Putting together stalinist and anarchist wouldn't be good, so paradox decided to put the two ideologies into two different "branches" of the hoi 4 political spectrum (counting that in real life, during the spanish civil war the stalinist almost started a civil war againist the anarchist, lied to the cnt-fai and other anti stalinist communist, usually lied to the poum). Sorry for bad english
Portugal most likely. I would like to see OWB or EaW again, but they are still updating and tweaking those mods to fit into 1.9, so it will have to wait
Britain gave it to Republican Spain right before the Anarchist revolution fired. So he had it for like a minute when he was still Republican and lost it, but got it back as soon as he took it from Republican Spain.
Pravus if your reading this I want you to know that you bring a lot of happiness and joy to my day Even though your a small channel you never fail to impress
@@AltiusMax no. Britain gave it to Republican Spain right before the Anarchist revolution fired. That's why he couldn't get his navy through the Straights the whole time. Matter of fact, if the anarchy had fired a moment sooner he wouldn't have gotten the achievement for it because Gibraltar went to Republican Spain, not Anarchist Spain.
@01:07 the anarcho-syndicalists have the same flag as the anarcho-communists, and the anarchists in spain at the time were syndies. it’s historically accurate to have that flag be the one that’s used. if anyone is interested in learning more about the Spanish Civil War, i recommend you read George Orwell’s “Homage to Catalonia.” It’s his memoir of when he fought against the fascists as a volunteer in the SCW.
Did he fight against fascism as well? Damn, I thought that writing 1984 and being a socialist was enough!
And the he snitched on his comrades... BOO!!!!
There's also 'Spain: The Vital Years' by Luis Bolin, who was Franco's press officer.
It is a good read
Yeah a lot of overlapping with these anarchist ideologies as most syndicalists also want to establish communism as the end goal and typically veiw syndicalism as the method of achieving industrial socialism.
1:08
CNT-FAI (the spanish anarchists) were anarcho-communists.
The decision to go with non-aligned is because an anarchist commune and the Soviet Union having the same ideology would make no sense.
wasn't CNT-FAI anarcho-syndicalist? (The flags are the same)
@@wiizzpl4718 "As you have probably detected from the above Anarcho-syndicalism is not the same thing as Anarchist Communism. The latter is an Anarchist vision for a post-capitalist society while the former is an Anarchist strategy to achieve such a society. Despite their difference these two ideas and practices have an essential connection. Firstly Anarcho-syndicalists have often been Anarchist Communists and vice versa. Rudolf Rocker, the founding father of Anarcho-syndicalism, was an Anarchist Communist before becoming an Anarcho-syndicalist and argued for an Anarchist Communist society in his book "Anarcho-syndicalism: Theory and Practice". The Anarchist Communist Peter Kropotkin had ideas of labor associations that prefigured Anarcho-syndicalism while the later Russian Anarchist Communists who wrote "The Organizational Platform of Libertarian Communists" advocated "syndicalism as the method" of class struggle. The modern Anarcho-syndicalist international advocates "Libertarian Communism" (another word for Anarchist Communism) as the society it seeks to create. Secondly I want to argue that both ideas and practices need each other."
TL:DR; anarcho-syndicalism is how to achieve anarcho-communism.
@@sarah07290 That would explain a lot. thx
@Albert D my mans, non-aligned is for anything that doesnt fit the other 3
@Albert D Non-Aligned isn't really an ideology. It's more of an "other" category.
You don't have to fight a civil war as Portugal to become a monarchist. You just need to have enough high stability for when the war triggers.
24:06
“One day the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans (1888).”
― Otto von Bismarck
I really hope this works. Would love to see anarchist Revolution in Portugal
red and black has always been the colorflag of anarchy bro
The cnt fai were anarcho syndicalist, which has a similar flag to ancoms and are way more closer to ancoms in goals than "anarcho" capitalists
For the record "Anarcho-Communism" is completely different for what is commonly called "Communism". In general, in common speech and usually in games, "Communism" is refered as an ideology derived from Marxism-Leninism, which has as an ultimate goal to reach "communism", an state in which private property is abolished, but it requires the survival of the state in an intermediate phase. "Anarcho-Communism" was a current of political thought derived from philosophers such as Mikhail Bakunin, Errico Malatesta and Peter Kropotkin, which also has the goal of the abolition of private property, but it dispenses for the need of having a "state" as an intermediate phase, because it completely rejects the state. So, having the "red and black" flag is completely historically accurate, because the flag is also the flag of anarcho-syndicalism, which is a current of anarchism greatly influenced by anarcho-communism (in fact, anarcho-syndicalism is more an organization strategy rather than a different ideology than anarcho-communism)
Yo Pravus! Great Video dude! I have a question though, what recording software do you use and how do you keep a good resolution and frames? Thanks!
anarcho-capitalism sounds like an oxymoron lol love the series btw :)
The real oxymoron is anarcho-monarchism.
Nah, anarcho-capitalism have nothing to do with anarchy, they just dont like the state
anarcho capitalists are right wing libertarians who got sick of getting called pedophiles lol
@@rileyminer9748 but ancaps are still pedos
@@theentirestateofnorway3151 And communists are genocidal
That's... What anarchism is? Not wanting a state is literally all it is
@@visiblur Anarchism refers to the removal of unjust hierarchy, while the state is included in this it is not the only form of hierarchy which stands to be destroyed
Red and black are also Anarcho-Syndicalist colors just a little PSA
Pravs can you make longer vids, just for now, whem corona is attacking... Please🙏
He make 20-30 minute long videos and uploads everyday, with that length and upload frequency, you really can't ask him for more.
@@this_is_patrick normally, yes. But everyone's quarantined and him included. He and everyone else has much more spare time and I think that pravus likes playing games.
@@obama69890 Yeah... everyone...
@@this_is_patrick There is no harm in making a request, especially in a respectful enough manner like that, IMO. Pravus can always ignore or deny as he see's fit.
I will always say this but you pronounce all the Spanish places and this perfectly, amazing!
About the Stability, the minimum is always the Party popularity when not in War, that prevents you from falling down to 0%
0:36 Is that the namesake for Scratch from Rimworld Zombieland?
mozambice and angola were portugese colonies and it said portugal had a wargoal on GERMANY
Actually, if you want a fictional, but true to how things went down look at the Spanish Civil War, the movie Land and Freedom is pretty great.
You should build at least 3 more dockyards to finish the ships being built faster and repair damaged ones.
anarcho communists aren't anything like Marxist leninists, and in game the communism ideology is basically just ML. anarcho communism is a very libertarian version of communism, and ML/maoist is very authoritarian. so even though they share a label they're not remotely similar.
marx and lenin were both anti-state comrade
@@chocotheminute907 Marx and Lenin were, yes, but Marxist-Leninism is a thing that Stalin came up with. It's just Stalinism. It stomps on the beliefs of marx *and* lenin.
It doesn't remove the bourgeoise, it replaces it. The new bourgeoise were the party members who still controlled the proletariat.
We are looking over the petty Portuguese fight
I'll gladly pay you tuesday for a full series today. Had to be at least 16 episodes
I believe Shift+H will have an army train all green units to the next level and stop them there. So you can add units to an army and have it train them without wasting supplies on the other units and without babysitting it to stop once all the units are actually trained.
You are playing the Anarcho-syndicalism Spain as they originated in Catalonia which is where the regional defence council is. So they really didn’t need to make it non aligned but I guess they just decided that it would represent general anarchism.
Brazil didn't go the Fascist route. It's a part of the Portugese/Brazilian monarchist path that they start a civil war with the fascists.
Portugal actually has two non aligned focuses, the proudly alone one (dictatorship) and the monarchy
Mass mobilisation is much better than deep battle
It's a mod on hoi4 workshop than give you a much better flag of anarchist Spain.
I'm gonna hope that Paradox will add Lehi gang in the next DLC
Well, here's the thing, the big C Communists, or stalinists you might say, in Spain together with the Republicans did do the whole government crackdown thing (with some encouragement from a certain Stalin) on CNT-FAI and the other faction, POUM. Look up what they did to the leader of POUM, Andres Nin.
On a more game related note I really want to know who the one PSOE/Social Democrat rep is in Anarchist Spain.
there is a focus that gives a manpower law for anarchism i think
anarcho-capitalism: "let me cash in my benefits, I need to keep fighting the system!" - "don't you tell me what to do, and get back into the line" ...yeah, it's pretty much still a thing.
0:55 well that's the anarcho syndicalist flag
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism
Question
Is cornna in Greenland?
Yes there is corn in greenland
@@alexwoogie462 We lost...
im currently wacthing banished:new cardiff!
I believe Paradox’s argument for non-aligned is those not aligned with the traditional major factions (Comintern, Allies, Axis). It doesn’t necessarily have any correlation to govt type
Yeah, that's exactly what it is
use the armored car for suppression its very good
imperiali.... i mean anarchy!!!
You couldn't get your ships through the Straight of Gibraltar because 1 you didn't own Gibraltar and 2 you didn't own Spanish North Africa. You could have moved the ships at any time after you controlled Gibraltar.
"Anarcho"-capitalism is not anarchism.
In fact it's another term for feudalism.
Good
Pravus, they probably used the anarcho-communist flag because most anarchists are communists or syndicalists. Most people aren't just "destroy the state" and nothing else.
Yeah, the ideology system is a bit dumb in this game
Anarchism is inherently leftist. Anarcho capitalists are a joke.
@@dankaroor based and truepilled
The flag in the portrait is probably the anarcho-syndicalist flag and its non aligned because syndicalism is different that communism in alot of ways.
The Anarcho-Communist flag is because the Spanish Anarchists were technically "Anarcho-Communists", their idea of an ideal society revolved around common ownership and redistribution of wealth equally in a libertine society.
It was a coalition of anarchists, communist and others. Anarcho communism as we have today didn't exist back then
@@user-uw9zn7ob1s yes
Shnibz that isnt true. Pyotr Kropotkin published The Conquest of Bread in 1892
do kaiserreich as mother rassia
Needs more Kaiserreich gameplay..... Maybe mittelafrika.... After broke play as tanganyika
You’d don’t have to fight a civil war against fascists all the time. It’s only if you have less then 40% stability
its funny how he mentioned the English de-colonization of egypt Mozambique and Angola as the last two was not English Colonies butt Portugese
After finish Spain play germany or Britain sorry for bad English
I never understood how AnarchoCommunism can be a thing when Marx’s ideal Communist world was already completely stateless.
Nobody denys that the goals are the same.
Marx seeked that an authoritarian state to implement the dictatorship of the proletariat and then slowly work to create global communism. Basically create a very powerful authoritarian state in the name of state socialism and then dismantle it(somehow?) In the name of communism. Creating anarchy with a state in a few words. Anarcho communists on the other hand says that a revolution done by the state is meant to fail and the dictatorship of the proletariat will only lead to the creation of a new ruling class and therefore they seek to to create libertarian socialism without a transition state and just abolish the state and capitalism completely all at once. Another key difference is that while Marxists(Orthodox Marxists) seek to establish global communism through state socialism , Anarcho communists seek to simply create anarchy and libertarian socialism and then have communism as simply one of the many different stateless anti capitalist forms of organization different anarchist communities can voluntarily choose to have. The other forms being syndicalism, collectivism, mutualism etc. So yeah that's the difference between Anarcho communism and Orthodox Marxism.
Hmmmm the text for ending the Civil war indicates the forming of communes, so this is, in fact, communists anarchism.... so why is it not part of the communist faction?
Because the "communist" in hoi 4 are almost always stalinist, witch search to archive a totalitarian form of state capitalism, when the anarco syndicalist (the spanish cnt fai witch pravus is doing the gameplay) tries to archive a stateless, moneyless and classless society where the workes controls the means of production. Putting together stalinist and anarchist wouldn't be good, so paradox decided to put the two ideologies into two different "branches" of the hoi 4 political spectrum (counting that in real life, during the spanish civil war the stalinist almost started a civil war againist the anarchist, lied to the cnt-fai and other anti stalinist communist, usually lied to the poum). Sorry for bad english
Its anarcho-communism, which is very different than most communism.
9:10 But hey, July 10th is my b-day tho
What will Pravus do when his done with the Anarchist?
Fifth empire i guess.
Portugal most likely. I would like to see OWB or EaW again, but they are still updating and tweaking those mods to fit into 1.9, so it will have to wait
👍👍👍
I tried this and it went haywire
How in the world did you get Gibraltar?
Britain gave it back to Spain during it's decolonization rampage
Britain gave it to Republican Spain right before the Anarchist revolution fired. So he had it for like a minute when he was still Republican and lost it, but got it back as soon as he took it from Republican Spain.
Thanks to both of you.
Can someone explain to me why the fuck the leader of *INTEGRALIST* Brazil is Getúlio Vargas?
Pravus if your reading this I want you to know that you bring a lot of happiness and joy to my day
Even though your a small channel you never fail to impress
Did i miss something or how did spain get Gibraltar
England went on a Decolonization spree and gave Gibraltar back to Spain just before the Civil War started.
Oh ok thanks
@@AltiusMax no. Britain gave it to Republican Spain right before the Anarchist revolution fired. That's why he couldn't get his navy through the Straights the whole time. Matter of fact, if the anarchy had fired a moment sooner he wouldn't have gotten the achievement for it because Gibraltar went to Republican Spain, not Anarchist Spain.
Ayo
fifth! I know its stupid
Play Soviet Union
as of posting this comment there is 927 views #first1000
As of me replying, there is 552 views.
third