Remember that Ulrich went through the cave only because he followed old Helge through it to find out what he's up to, so that's who he is looking for when he emerges on the other side. He believes the old man in the pajamas must be somewhere around to be found. The idea that he should have known Helge would be a boy back then is not even on his radar - finding the old Helge he knows is the only thing on his mind. But during the conversation at the police station he begins to realize that a young Helge is there, and maybe he can do more than just gather info ...
Ironicaly, Egon's house in the 50's is the Nielsen's house in the 80's and 2019. Agnes rents a room there with Tronte and later on, Tronte takes over the house. Maybe that also fuels the feud between Egon and Ulrich. After Egon goes downhill, that "punk" is living in "his" house!
@@frakkintoasterluvva7920 I definetly think so! But my interpretation is that Egon had to sell his house, because he was in a downwards spiral. And it can be painfull to see where you once were and now someone else living there. But that is not stated in the show, just my interpretation.
@@frakkintoasterluvva7920 Well that depends. I always bring in the example of my grandparents. My grandmother had inherited the house from her parents and she did in the end bequeath it to my mother... which in turn strained the relationship between the sisters. But that is a longer story. A popular theory is that Egon and Doris took in lodgers to save money for Claudia to attend a university... which in turn could mean that either of them decided to sell the place after their lodger had disappeared. Another possibility is that Claudia sold the place to Tronte. At some point she has probably left Winden to study at some university.
@@michaelklaus The first option seems likely. The second - wouldn't Egon still own the house, rather than Claudia? Unless it was specifically Doris' family house and she left it to Claudia.
Actually, Helge's mum's style of education was pretty normal in the 50s. Even in school, the teachers had sticks for the naughty pupils. The whole corporal punishment was eventually abandoned in the 60s.
"It's the 50's, someone has to be cheating"... lol. I'm sure i was not the only one who, earlier in the episode, thought Agnes was going to have an affair with Egon... right?
Always remember that the number 3 is important: three timelines (1953, 1986, 2019), that past, the present and the future, 33 years, the triquetra as the symbol of Sic Mundus, the Penrose triangle on Tannhaus' book, three dead boys etc.
Helge threw a stick in the cave. He didn’t hurt the dog. I’d assume the dog can go fetch it and come back out. It was still light outside for the dog to see the entrance/exit. I don’t think that makes it okay that he got bullied and peed on.
@@kittyxrae4860 Oh, lol 😂. Liz said it with such a straight face and then I think a cut was there. In general, people tend to overreact to that dog scene IMO. He let out some built up frustration but he didn’t hurt the dog. 🤷🏾♀️
... when you take the title of the episode in account you shucked think about too if Ulrich caused Helge's "behaviour" later by this attack... Would have Helge became someone different if a stranger hadn't suddenly appeared and attacked him with a rock? By the way do you remember what the old Helge said to Ulrich in the hospital when Ulrich tried to interrogate him - it was the same what Ulrich said to young Helge before the cabin...
no, it can't ne the case, that the young version of a person dies and its older self is still alive, since in that case the person would never grow old and become the older self.
Although the same person can exist at the same time (eg. Mikkel/Michael), it's not possible for an older version to exist when the younger version is dead. Dead is dead. A person can only grow old and travel through time if they're alive to do so.
3 ปีที่แล้ว +6
18:35 Isn't it easier to beat side of the head than forehead? You don't have to angle your hand to do that. Just a natural movement for right handed Ulrich.
Yeah I was pretty savage for that comment. What I was trying to say is if your intent is to kill someone I would think you'd want to be more deliberate instead of smashing up the side of the ear/head. Lol I am a true crime addict and it's pretty amazing what the human body can endure and still survive lol
3 ปีที่แล้ว +4
@@LibrasReact Ulrich must have been sure he did it because it was just a kid and he's strong adult man, using a stone and hitting multiple times. I mean i wouldn't think Helge would survive.
@@LibrasReact I get what you mean. If he had hit his head from above the ground would have made it impossible for the head to be moved away from the impact. But that's how poeple loose an eye.
To be fair, the temple is the weakest spot of the skull... I think Ulrich was mainly aiming for that. Still, Ulrich didn't hit him hard enough to kill him. Helge was very unlucky, but in a weird way also lucky (to survive).
Killing animals? Helge hasn't killed any animals. 17:28 No, Ulrich thinks middle aged Helge killed the children. He said so to Charlotte in his voice message: "I was right, it was Helge Doppler, but in 1986". But he tried to follow old Helge back in time when old Helge went to the past. Clearly, however, old Helge did not go back to the 1950s.
@@frakkintoasterluvva7920 Spoilers I think cause the line I'm talking about hasn't happened yet soz . .. ... .... He'd think, "well the first thing Charlotte talks about regarding the birds is asking if they can be brought back to life, Helge meanwhile talks about the beauty of death". This is of course an Ulrich who is an avid fan of the show Dark and has seen all the scenes he's not in who's speaking Anyway, writing that out I just realised how profoundly relevant the dichotomy of Helge and Charlotte is here to the rest of the show. Specifically Adam and Eva and the final resolution.
@@pseudonymousbeing987 Spoilers . . . . . Of course. :) But Dark-viewer Ulrich would also know about Noah, and that Helge won't kill anyone because he wants to or has any murder impulses or wants to see people dead, and that his conclusion was wrong.
Nice one as usual! 0:55 Yes, interesting thought. The more correct terminology would be "time period" if you mean one point in time. Because "timeline" means something a bit different, i would say. For example, one character's timeline goes from their birth to their death, it doesn't matter which time period they jump to within their individual timeline. This would also answer the question if someone can be alive as their old version, but dead as their young version (this much can be concluded already, and just from general consideration): No, because when you're dead, your individual timeline ends. Remember, these are not alternate universes, this is the same reality, shown in different time periods. Whenever someone dies, the oldest age you will ever see them be is just before their death. Death is final.
The term timeline is also usually used to describe alterations to the timeline and distinguish between several altered timelines. I am still a fan of the term time plane that bo and Jantje tried to coin in the interviews (still not sure why they did not simply put it in the show). Basically what they suggest is that the the timeline is twisted like a spiral. Each winding represents a time frame of 33 years. So normally everything moves along the spiral into the future but inside the passage you can actually jump the gap between one winding and the next. But, you might ask, where do the planes come in? Normally a timeline represents each moment as a single point in the line. But these moments have their own spatial dimensions. Since we cant's visualize anything four dimensional we simply ditch 2 spacial dimensions. But if you simply skip one of the three spatial dimensions you can visualize the spatial dimesions as a plane... I always like to think of that plane as the town limits of Winden itself although it is clear that it expands beyond that.
@@michaelklaus Interesting. But with time planes, they would have to do additional explanations within the show. We might have had to sit through an entire lesson in the classroom scene, instead of just a few explanation about black holes 😁
Bernd Doppler didn't "give" the nucleair plant to Helge, because Helge is not exactly the brightest. In this episode you can see Claudia being very smart, tutoring a total inferiour Helge. Spoilers: There may be other reasons as well, lol. Explained in season 3
It's not explained how anyone got the power plant because a nuclear power plant (despite everything The Simpsons told you) cannot be owned by a private person..., at least not in Europe. Bernd, Claudia, and Aleksander are all just the appointed directors of the plant. Since Bernd is trying to win investors for the endeavor it is also unlikely that he has full control of the company behind the power plant. So he also cannot bequeath the company that owns the power plant to his son or anybody else. Bernd is simply somebody who also worked personally for the plant to be built, the funding and the permit. This is also important to note when people in the audience keep suggesting Regina should have inherited the nuclear power plant from Claudia... it is simply not how that works.
@@michaelklaus yes, correct. That is why i wrote "give" and not just give. It is not a family business to be inheritted. Helge was just not a suitable follow up. And Claudia was smart and suitable to be the new CEO/director/boss...
I'm just so proud that you're theories - while not all of them are spot on, most of them're pretty damn close. You two are doing so much better than some of the other groups of reactors I've seen. You say you're confused, but I would say that's not very true. You're both grasping everything very well, and have some very good theories. I'd be lying if I said I'm not envious of your handling of the show, 'cause I wasn't that good at it.
Yeah I thought that was funny that we said we were confused but we seemed to know exactly what was going on HAHA I will say in the next episode we are for sure confused lol!!
1:15 In theory yes. If you had a non-deterministic timeline that completely ignored causality. Then you could see somebody die, go back in time to save that person by taking them to the future and be stuck with them staring at their dead body. But then this would happen with everything you extract from the time stream. ... and usually writers do not pull this through and end up with rather arbitrary rules on why some things have copies and others do not. It usually works out better if you're not actually travelling through time but instead use some device that basically works like a Star Trek transporter but instead of retreiving items and people from spacial dimensions it also works on temporal dimensions. Well or magic that works similar to that... usually some sort of ritual.
14:27 As I rambled on about responding to somebody else's comment: That is not how that works. This is a nuclear facility not some gum factory. It is actually laid out in dialogue in the show: In Claudia's second scene (in 1x03 obviously) when she approaches the gate Helge says "My father told me that the board voted unanimously for you." So the plant or the company that runs the plant has a corporative board, an "Aufsichtsrat". Bernd, as a natural person, does not own the nuclear power plant and it is unlikely that he owns the company running the power plant. It's more likely that he/his business is the main investor in the plant. Bernd was the first appointed director of the plant, Claudia was his appointed successor and at some later point the board appointed Aleksander as director of the plant. There is actually a list on Wikipedia about companies that own nuclear power plants and someday I might research all of those to prove that none of those is owned by a Mr. Burns figure.
I am amazed on how observant you two are. You come to a lot of good conclusions and only a few false ones and those... oh my god are those cute snoring noises in the background?... well some of those are basically misdirects since the show wants you to ask these questions.
This is a really unnecessary detail and I’m just being annoying, but the bunker at the shed is not a cellar but a bomb shelter from ww2! I love your reactions and how well you keep up with this crazy story :)
That's the struggle though we don't want to miss something by writing things down and we can't pause during the reaction. We do sometimes rewatch episodes and also during editing we usually catch things we may have missed.
@@kittyxrae4860 I get it, but if it is too complicated to write things while you are watching just stick to mapping out the family tree (thats a lot of fun btw) and maybe the question you were left with after watching the episode. Some question on season 1 aren't answered until seasons later, so I 100% recommend it for a better experience 💕💕
Ofcourse it is not "ok" to kill a child, even if that child would grow up to be a murderer. That doesn't mean I wouldn't do it myself if that could save my own child tho... When it comes to (protecting) my children, I think emotion would be more dominant than ratio.
It's the eternal fight between *"the greater good"* : that means killing a kid is bad but if it prevents the killing of 20 people in the future (as he becomes a serial killer) is ok to do it VERSUS *"the loyalty to morality"* : that even if that happens, killing a kid is inherently evil and unmoral regardless of the outcome and should not be done.
@@Alejojojo6 like i said: it is NOT ok. And as an outsider I would not do it. But as a mother (of a missing child, whom I think is killed) I think I could be able to such an act... I will never know ofcourse, because the chance that I will be engaged in time travelling is quite slim 😅... But i am just saying that as a parent, you would do almost anything to protect or safe your child...
@@frakkintoasterluvva7920 Ofcourse, in this case, Ulrich almost beating Helge to death, it does cause the child murders... We as viewers can see that. But Ulrich didn't know that. He thought he was in the past for the first time, thinking it was his only chance to change things
"... aim for the forehead." 🤣🤣🤣 I can't stand kids, so... that sounds like excellent advice. He should've just came back to modern times, traveled to the U.S., and located Casey Anthony. Then took her back to 1953 with him, and let her do what she does best.
18:00 The future also influences the past.
"I can change the past. And the future."
Who said it first?
PARADOX
Remember that Ulrich went through the cave only because he followed old Helge through it to find out what he's up to, so that's who he is looking for when he emerges on the other side. He believes the old man in the pajamas must be somewhere around to be found. The idea that he should have known Helge would be a boy back then is not even on his radar - finding the old Helge he knows is the only thing on his mind. But during the conversation at the police station he begins to realize that a young Helge is there, and maybe he can do more than just gather info ...
Exactly. Ulrich isn't searching for you Helge, but the old one whom he followed.
This show doesn't pull its punches. In the previous episode, old Helge almost flat-lined when Ulrich confronted him, now we know why.
Yep!!!! Damn this show always doing that to us.
You can't grow old when you're dead as a kid. (Mads/stranger theory)
Ironicaly, Egon's house in the 50's is the Nielsen's house in the 80's and 2019. Agnes rents a room there with Tronte and later on, Tronte takes over the house. Maybe that also fuels the feud between Egon and Ulrich. After Egon goes downhill, that "punk" is living in "his" house!
Well, someone had to sell the house to Tronte, right? So Egon must have gotten money for it.
@@frakkintoasterluvva7920 I definetly think so! But my interpretation is that Egon had to sell his house, because he was in a downwards spiral. And it can be painfull to see where you once were and now someone else living there. But that is not stated in the show, just my interpretation.
@@frakkintoasterluvva7920 Well that depends. I always bring in the example of my grandparents. My grandmother had inherited the house from her parents and she did in the end bequeath it to my mother... which in turn strained the relationship between the sisters. But that is a longer story.
A popular theory is that Egon and Doris took in lodgers to save money for Claudia to attend a university... which in turn could mean that either of them decided to sell the place after their lodger had disappeared.
Another possibility is that Claudia sold the place to Tronte. At some point she has probably left Winden to study at some university.
@@michaelklaus The first option seems likely. The second - wouldn't Egon still own the house, rather than Claudia? Unless it was specifically Doris' family house and she left it to Claudia.
@@michaelklaus Remember that there is no tuition fee in Germany. Though, you had to have the money for accommodation, food etc.
ohh sweet first cycle children
Ahaha it's ridiculously entertaining to watch reactions of the first season
Actually, Helge's mum's style of education was pretty normal in the 50s. Even in school, the teachers had sticks for the naughty pupils. The whole corporal punishment was eventually abandoned in the 60s.
Dear Ladies ;) If you think that was the most confusing episode.... just wait :D
🤭
"It's the 50's, someone has to be cheating"... lol. I'm sure i was not the only one who, earlier in the episode, thought Agnes was going to have an affair with Egon... right?
Always remember that the number 3 is important: three timelines (1953, 1986, 2019), that past, the present and the future, 33 years, the triquetra as the symbol of Sic Mundus, the Penrose triangle on Tannhaus' book, three dead boys etc.
Literally Everyone: "Ulrich can't do it...he can't... OMG!"
Liz: "He should've aimed for the forehead"
:D
😅
Two kinds of people... 😂
👁👄👁
LoL
Helge threw a stick in the cave. He didn’t hurt the dog. I’d assume the dog can go fetch it and come back out. It was still light outside for the dog to see the entrance/exit. I don’t think that makes it okay that he got bullied and peed on.
That was a joke!
Yeah that confused me too, Helge never hurt the poor doggo haha
@@kittyxrae4860 Oh, lol 😂. Liz said it with such a straight face and then I think a cut was there. In general, people tend to overreact to that dog scene IMO. He let out some built up frustration but he didn’t hurt the dog. 🤷🏾♀️
The scene with Urlich and young Helge is just 🤪
I loved the coroners exam and the 1950's mentality trying to wrap their heads around current tattos and clothes made in China, hilarious.
Yes!!!!!
Whoa, you have a triquetra necklace? Can you wear that for future Dark reactions? 😃
... when you take the title of the episode in account you shucked think about too if Ulrich caused Helge's "behaviour" later by this attack... Would have Helge became someone different if a stranger hadn't suddenly appeared and attacked him with a rock?
By the way do you remember what the old Helge said to Ulrich in the hospital when Ulrich tried to interrogate him - it was the same what Ulrich said to young Helge before the cabin...
This is just stating the obvious
@@cmo6055 yeah - I don’t want to give spoilers! I do love to watch you on your journey of „Dark“
no, it can't ne the case, that the young version of a person dies and its older self is still alive, since in that case the person would never grow old and become the older self.
Although the same person can exist at the same time (eg. Mikkel/Michael), it's not possible for an older version to exist when the younger version is dead. Dead is dead. A person can only grow old and travel through time if they're alive to do so.
18:35 Isn't it easier to beat side of the head than forehead? You don't have to angle your hand to do that. Just a natural movement for right handed Ulrich.
Yeah I was pretty savage for that comment. What I was trying to say is if your intent is to kill someone I would think you'd want to be more deliberate instead of smashing up the side of the ear/head. Lol I am a true crime addict and it's pretty amazing what the human body can endure and still survive lol
@@LibrasReact Ulrich must have been sure he did it because it was just a kid and he's strong adult man, using a stone and hitting multiple times. I mean i wouldn't think Helge would survive.
@ And leaving him locked in an abandoned place should have condemn him.
@@LibrasReact I get what you mean. If he had hit his head from above the ground would have made it impossible for the head to be moved away from the impact.
But that's how poeple loose an eye.
To be fair, the temple is the weakest spot of the skull... I think Ulrich was mainly aiming for that. Still, Ulrich didn't hit him hard enough to kill him. Helge was very unlucky, but in a weird way also lucky (to survive).
you guys are so lucky you get to experience Dark for the first time !!! Enjoy it !
Killing animals? Helge hasn't killed any animals.
17:28 No, Ulrich thinks middle aged Helge killed the children. He said so to Charlotte in his voice message: "I was right, it was Helge Doppler, but in 1986".
But he tried to follow old Helge back in time when old Helge went to the past. Clearly, however, old Helge did not go back to the 1950s.
No, Helge just thinks the dead birds are beautiful. But it did trigger Ulrich, who sees him as a child murderer already.
@@cmo6055 What would Ulrich think if he saw Charlotte collecting dead birds...? 😅
@@frakkintoasterluvva7920
Spoilers I think cause the line I'm talking about hasn't happened yet soz
.
..
...
....
He'd think, "well the first thing Charlotte talks about regarding the birds is asking if they can be brought back to life, Helge meanwhile talks about the beauty of death". This is of course an Ulrich who is an avid fan of the show Dark and has seen all the scenes he's not in who's speaking
Anyway, writing that out I just realised how profoundly relevant the dichotomy of Helge and Charlotte is here to the rest of the show. Specifically Adam and Eva and the final resolution.
@@pseudonymousbeing987 Spoilers
.
.
.
.
.
Of course. :) But Dark-viewer Ulrich would also know about Noah, and that Helge won't kill anyone because he wants to or has any murder impulses or wants to see people dead, and that his conclusion was wrong.
Nice one as usual! 0:55 Yes, interesting thought. The more correct terminology would be "time period" if you mean one point in time. Because "timeline" means something a bit different, i would say. For example, one character's timeline goes from their birth to their death, it doesn't matter which time period they jump to within their individual timeline. This would also answer the question if someone can be alive as their old version, but dead as their young version (this much can be concluded already, and just from general consideration): No, because when you're dead, your individual timeline ends. Remember, these are not alternate universes, this is the same reality, shown in different time periods. Whenever someone dies, the oldest age you will ever see them be is just before their death. Death is final.
Exactly 👏
The term timeline is also usually used to describe alterations to the timeline and distinguish between several altered timelines.
I am still a fan of the term time plane that bo and Jantje tried to coin in the interviews (still not sure why they did not simply put it in the show).
Basically what they suggest is that the the timeline is twisted like a spiral. Each winding represents a time frame of 33 years. So normally everything moves along the spiral into the future but inside the passage you can actually jump the gap between one winding and the next.
But, you might ask, where do the planes come in? Normally a timeline represents each moment as a single point in the line. But these moments have their own spatial dimensions. Since we cant's visualize anything four dimensional we simply ditch 2 spacial dimensions. But if you simply skip one of the three spatial dimensions you can visualize the spatial dimesions as a plane... I always like to think of that plane as the town limits of Winden itself although it is clear that it expands beyond that.
@@michaelklaus Interesting. But with time planes, they would have to do additional explanations within the show. We might have had to sit through an entire lesson in the classroom scene, instead of just a few explanation about black holes 😁
The thumbnail of you two cheering right as Ulrich is about to attempt to murder a child lmfao
Bernd Doppler didn't "give" the nucleair plant to Helge, because Helge is not exactly the brightest. In this episode you can see Claudia being very smart, tutoring a total inferiour Helge.
Spoilers:
There may be other reasons as well, lol. Explained in season 3
Not explained at all ;)
It's not explained how anyone got the power plant because a nuclear power plant (despite everything The Simpsons told you) cannot be owned by a private person..., at least not in Europe. Bernd, Claudia, and Aleksander are all just the appointed directors of the plant.
Since Bernd is trying to win investors for the endeavor it is also unlikely that he has full control of the company behind the power plant. So he also cannot bequeath the company that owns the power plant to his son or anybody else.
Bernd is simply somebody who also worked personally for the plant to be built, the funding and the permit.
This is also important to note when people in the audience keep suggesting Regina should have inherited the nuclear power plant from Claudia... it is simply not how that works.
@@michaelklaus yes, correct. That is why i wrote "give" and not just give. It is not a family business to be inheritted. Helge was just not a suitable follow up. And Claudia was smart and suitable to be the new CEO/director/boss...
I'm just so proud that you're theories - while not all of them are spot on, most of them're pretty damn close. You two are doing so much better than some of the other groups of reactors I've seen. You say you're confused, but I would say that's not very true. You're both grasping everything very well, and have some very good theories. I'd be lying if I said I'm not envious of your handling of the show, 'cause I wasn't that good at it.
Yeah I thought that was funny that we said we were confused but we seemed to know exactly what was going on HAHA I will say in the next episode we are for sure confused lol!!
@@kittyxrae4860 but you are not alone we all was confused at that point 😏
Haha girrrl. The moment you said "Ulrich is my spirit animal" I was like Hahaha just wait 2 sec. You might change your mind. 😂
1:15 In theory yes. If you had a non-deterministic timeline that completely ignored causality. Then you could see somebody die, go back in time to save that person by taking them to the future and be stuck with them staring at their dead body. But then this would happen with everything you extract from the time stream. ... and usually writers do not pull this through and end up with rather arbitrary rules on why some things have copies and others do not. It usually works out better if you're not actually travelling through time but instead use some device that basically works like a Star Trek transporter but instead of retreiving items and people from spacial dimensions it also works on temporal dimensions. Well or magic that works similar to that... usually some sort of ritual.
8:50 Are you remembering that correctly?
14:27 As I rambled on about responding to somebody else's comment: That is not how that works. This is a nuclear facility not some gum factory.
It is actually laid out in dialogue in the show: In Claudia's second scene (in 1x03 obviously) when she approaches the gate Helge says "My father told me that the board voted unanimously for you." So the plant or the company that runs the plant has a corporative board, an "Aufsichtsrat".
Bernd, as a natural person, does not own the nuclear power plant and it is unlikely that he owns the company running the power plant. It's more likely that he/his business is the main investor in the plant.
Bernd was the first appointed director of the plant, Claudia was his appointed successor and at some later point the board appointed Aleksander as director of the plant.
There is actually a list on Wikipedia about companies that own nuclear power plants and someday I might research all of those to prove that none of those is owned by a Mr. Burns figure.
24:00 Oh yeah I was about to pose the question: Would you kill baby Hitler?
I am amazed on how observant you two are. You come to a lot of good conclusions and only a few false ones and those... oh my god are those cute snoring noises in the background?... well some of those are basically misdirects since the show wants you to ask these questions.
8:36: Her grandfather, not her dad. ;-)
This is a really unnecessary detail and I’m just being annoying, but the bunker at the shed is not a cellar but a bomb shelter from ww2!
I love your reactions and how well you keep up with this crazy story :)
Girls u should take notes bc shit gets harder 😭😭
That's the struggle though we don't want to miss something by writing things down and we can't pause during the reaction. We do sometimes rewatch episodes and also during editing we usually catch things we may have missed.
@@kittyxrae4860 I get it, but if it is too complicated to write things while you are watching just stick to mapping out the family tree (thats a lot of fun btw) and maybe the question you were left with after watching the episode. Some question on season 1 aren't answered until seasons later, so I 100% recommend it for a better experience 💕💕
I like the scene with ulrich and young helge
_Ulrich is my spirit animal_
*Spirit animal bashed in the head of a child!*
Haha I think she changed her mind after that LOL
Personally, i'm more for rehabilitation than death sentence. I would have changed Helge's life.
Ofcourse it is not "ok" to kill a child, even if that child would grow up to be a murderer. That doesn't mean I wouldn't do it myself if that could save my own child tho... When it comes to (protecting) my children, I think emotion would be more dominant than ratio.
It's the eternal fight between *"the greater good"* : that means killing a kid is bad but if it prevents the killing of 20 people in the future (as he becomes a serial killer) is ok to do it VERSUS *"the loyalty to morality"* : that even if that happens, killing a kid is inherently evil and unmoral regardless of the outcome and should not be done.
@@Alejojojo6 like i said: it is NOT ok. And as an outsider I would not do it. But as a mother (of a missing child, whom I think is killed) I think I could be able to such an act... I will never know ofcourse, because the chance that I will be engaged in time travelling is quite slim 😅... But i am just saying that as a parent, you would do almost anything to protect or safe your child...
@@Alejojojo6 ...especially since you don't actually know that it would prevent the killing of others.
It may cause it, for all you know.
Well, you touch one of the main theme of Dark.
@@frakkintoasterluvva7920 Ofcourse, in this case, Ulrich almost beating Helge to death, it does cause the child murders... We as viewers can see that. But Ulrich didn't know that. He thought he was in the past for the first time, thinking it was his only chance to change things
"He's going to go left, I know it." Me: "yeah, the left is best."
Then I realized you weren't referring to politics.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
"... aim for the forehead." 🤣🤣🤣 I can't stand kids, so... that sounds like excellent advice. He should've just came back to modern times, traveled to the U.S., and located Casey Anthony. Then took her back to 1953 with him, and let her do what she does best.