I just want to thank all the nsf crew for the always amazing job keeping us informed and inspired! Also always cool earrings, but those sls ones are amazing!!
@@Rosieplayz100NASA doesn't really have the budget to hire new people so a lot of things get put on hold to do other things. Just like in any company, when you have one guy doing 20 different things because he's the only one that knows how to do it, he's always getting pulled in every direction and just doesn't really get a lot done because everything is a priority. That and the sheer amount of testing that has to go into every single device is incredible. When I say testing, I don't mean just test. You have to come up with a full test plan on how you're going to test it. You have to get that approved. You test it. Then you have to write and issue a full report on how it tested with a success or failure. Now consider that you have 20 of these to do in the next few weeks. It's easy to see how things can get pushed aside for other things.
So they (again) delayed Artemis II by several months, and it now over a year away, but they are STILL not able to replace the heat shield in that time frame? Compared to NASA's Orion development, even Boeing's Starliner is fast.
@@CentauriBros No, Musk does not make that. You need to really look into everything better. Musk's TOTAL value with everything he owns is 362B. However, he would have to sell everything to get access to that. And that value will drop as soon as he starts selling, which is what happened when he bought Twitter.
Can't say I'm surprised to see another Artemis timeline slip. The whole thing was ludicrously paced from the start. Didn't get nearly the funding needed as well, even with a more sane timeline. SLS sucking up billions and billions didn't help either. On the one hand nice to see a more realistic timeline being put out, but politicians don't like to wait ( if it doesn't finish when they're in office, how will they benefit from it? ) so the longer it takes the more likely it'll get scrapped. Which would suck for a multitude of reasons
The move of Orbex to the Saxavord Spaceport was mainly due to the failure of the US ABL Space RS1 rocket program which was supposed to be the main regular launcher from the site.
Im really interested into how these heat shield issues didnt pop up on Orion's first test flight on a Delta IV, especially considering that was like half the point of the mission
A return from lunar orbit involves much more speed and therefore much greater heating on reentry rather than from a low earth orbit. You can see this by examining Apollo Command Modules that have returned from the moon and ones that have returned from LEO.
Test with real hardware and test often. NASA blowhard in chief insists SLS is crew-ready because his buddies in the Senate and the WH demand it after only a single test. Starship has now flown six times, but even that eternal optimist Elon Musk does not claim it will be ready for carrying passengers until after 100 test flights, that is about September 2026.
Then the HLS would need a super-high-velocity heat shield it’s not currently designed for. There’s not enough Delta-V to sync back to Dragon in LEO coming back.
@AlexBurgerTX Engineering challenges in spaceflight are mind numbingly difficult, with virtually no recourse for inaccuracy. Even the world’s best rocket engineers took years longer than anticipated on a virtually unlimited budget to complete a single Starship test flight.
Nice compacting of the Artemis info in any case Ps I watched it and the stream was hard to follow at many instances. Plus how can can the not get a good conference place for the man in Germany. Please just use headsets.
Falcon 9's diameter is a bit smaller than Orion...but would it - or Falcon Heavy - be capable of launching the Orion capsule on a Lunar Transfer Orbit instead of using SLS?
Not in current configuration.capsule itself weights 10.5t, with service module 26t. Dragon 2 weights 8.5 t. Falcon heavy can carry up to 26.9t to GTO, to mars 16.8t. MTO and LTO are quite.. similar. So let's say that to LTO fh can carry maybe 20t. So it's unlikely that fh could put Orion in lto,. On the other side, there are abandoned plans for using Dragon for lunar mission. Off there would be need to create proper service stage instead of trunk. And ofc human rating of falcon heavy. So at LEAST one flight with modifications. Another abandoned SpaceX concept was that Raptor was developed initially to power falcon 9 second stage (in that time it was thought as hydrolox engine, not methalox). I have no idea how much Raptor had changed from initial concept, especially as for dimensions. But MAYBE it's possible to create new methalox second stage powered by much more efficient rvac variant. Probably it would require lot of changes in tower (fuel system is one thing, but probably methalox second stage will have to be simply bigger as methane is much less dense than kerosene). Or maybe combination of those two approaches would be possible. Either way if that decision would be made, it would take probably 2 years to implement at best. Maybe to switch for Artemis 4.
Even beyond the heat shield issue, Artemis2 is dangerous because Artemis1 did NOT have a fully functional life support system. A full life support + unmanned flight needs to go up FIRST.
Its shocking to me that theres space geeks who dont get or understand this selection for NASA head. A space geek that loves NASA thats well respected, and that's spent millions of his own money going to space, taking people with him to space, and doing science in space. But most importantly over 100 billion has been spent on the SLS which is year behind, not close to ready, and has flown once. And when its ready its going to cost 4 billion per flight (originally claimed was 0.5 to 2B). In comparison in the space of only a few years and with 5 billion Space X has got Starship flying (doing what the disposable SLS needs to do) and is further being developed to make its rapidly reusable and ready for in space refueling. Thats like watching a person rip past you on their speed boat, while you use one oar to row your two oar rowing boat!!
NASA is Roscosmos lite, can you imagine if commercial space never took off? this moon program is saying "i would rather hand away the moon to chinese than admit we screwed up and start over" this is what polititcal and bureaucratic enshitification looks like.
Isaacman was planning to pay for a Starship to emulate Artemis II by sending a crew around the Moon. Now he will be able to get Congress to help fund the mission. My one concern is that neither Trump nor Isaacman control the NASA budget. That is in the hands of Congress. Why would Congress cancel a program that funds a hundred thousand jobs across America, even if it makes no economic sense. In particular I do not believe Artemis II and III are vulnerable. The earliest mission that can be bypassed is Artemis IV.
Refreshing to hear someone talk about something tangentially related to politics without there being a major bias for or against it. People obsess over politics yet no one actually understands it.
A lack of a budget and planning to hire new people mixed with a long-term hiring freeze and a tendency to use contractors is resulting in a massive amount of people retiring. Essentially the same group of people has moved all through the space program and are now aging and retiring. This is going to result in a massive amount of lost knowledge very soon because there were no people to hand it down to.
Yup. SpaceX is burning people down, but also is getting most of talents and passionates. Because in spx there is at least feeling that it matter what you do as engineer. And ofc are also other space startups that also are taking lot of talents.
That's a very reasonable time-line. I think Art 4 will be delayed until 2033. It has to use Mobile Launcher 2 which was originally scheduled for a delivery of March 2023 at a cost under 500 million. In December of 2023 NASA estimated the cost to be 1.5 billion with a delivery of November 2026. Then NASA's Office of Inspector General did an audit and determined the cost could reach 2.7 billion, more than 5X the original planned cost AND due to the time required for NASA to prepare the Launcher, it would not be ready to support a launch until spring of 2029. So, 6yrs delayed and 2.2 billion over budget. Lol NASA is a joke.
All of the emissions to do a mission like this, and worrying about what hazardous chemicals burns off during reentry is crazy. Some hippy is going to get someone killed.
Tragedy of the commons In other news, let’s get back to when lead was the basis for color pigmentation in paint! Those colors held up great over the years. The new water base pigments are junk and you have to replace signs every few years because people can’t read them anymore driving by. Those dangumned hippies!!!! By the way, Why did crime skyrocket in that time frame lead paint and gasoline was legal, and then plummet after the hippies got their way???????
NASA state it would take them a year to replace Artemis heatshield, SpaceX replaced the much, much larger Starship heatshield in thee weeks! That about sums up the inefficiency of NASA today. Hopefully Jaraed Isaacman will quickly scrap SLS and make changes to make NASA fit for purpose just like it used to be. (Love your ‘droppers’ Elysia.😊)
It took a lot longer for SpaceX to design the new heat shield. Also, it may not be able to withstand Moon return velocities. It would need to be tested and verified, which would require a test flight a la Artemis I, which would require tanker flights that are still years away.
You obviously don't understand the difference in returning from LEO and returning from the moon. Elon is counting on your ignorance to get what he wants.
Artemis was a reasonable plan if it would have been done on time and on budget. Now is time to kill off SLS & Lunar Gateway. Time for Artemis to evolve into Artemis Lunar Direct with Starship HLS fueled in LEO.
Dislikes extension is fake, it rounds up based on their users' view count and dislikes and the official view count. This makes the result very biased. Dislikes are usually lower than it says.
or people hitting the wrong button ( since they're next to each other ) or flat earth morons, or trolls that just hit dislike because they can then move on without watching, etc.
I don't think Isaacman gets confirmed. First off, you can kiss any Polaris mission goodbye, not because he flies on it, but because he funds it, and that will land him in legal trouble if it goes because it'll be seen as him using taxpayer dollars for something Congress did not approve, using the same precedent as Trump's businesses. Secondly, many of the Senators want these go-nowhere projects for their states because it means "job security". One of the worst jobs in my personal opinion and I'll never go back to defense contractors for that reason, but so be it. Thirdly, it's a Trump nomination. Automatically, every single Democrat is a "no" vote. Combine with number two and he's not getting in.
What are NASA thinking, a year to replace the heatshield when SpaceX can do the same in a week. The other question is why are they not using SpaceX heatshield as their product is decade's ahead of the tech being used by NASA?
Starship lunar vehicle to orbit receives full fuel.Falcon 9 takes crew up to orbit and to the starship. Starship does mission to Moon and back. Falcon 9 brings crew back down to earth. the current NASA administrator is too stupid to understand that if it's human rated to go from lunar gateway to their surface of the Moon then it's human rated to go from Earth orbit to the Moon and back.
There’s not enough delta-v on HLS to brake in LEO to dock with Dragon after the moon landing. So you would need a heat shield on HLS, and entering from moon velocity is a different dragon than suborbital hops.
@@gregsutton2400 The problem is a lot of you seem to think administrator means dictator. Congress holds the purse strings. That's who decides what is funded.
I'm (NOT) nessassary against Jared Issacman being appointed to NASA. However Isaacman simply resigning as CEO of Shift4 isn't enough to prevent massive conflicts of interest, as he owns atleast 30% of Shift4 and they purchased over 27 million in (SpaceX stocks), and have made millions since then, from that investment. This means Jared isn't just friends with Elon Musk. He has a (significant personal financial interest in SpaceX success.) That must change. That's an unexceptable conflict of interest to any rational/ethical person, and Jared resigning as CEO of Shift4 does nothing to fix that big problem. Otherwise What's there to stop Jared as NASA administrator from making significant personal profits by favoring SpaceX for NASA contracts and sabotaging/preventing other companies from competing with SpaceX? I'm not saying he would definitely do that, but the massive conflict still exists at this point. So for his NASA appointment to seem remotely legitimate Isaacman must sell all his Shift4/SpaceX shares/stocks. Yes it would clearly be unethical for him to be the NASA administrator if he's still making profit from SpaceX/Shift4. As I said Im not against Isaacman being NASA administrator aslong as this massive conflict of interest is (resolved properly) and not simply ignored during the confirmation process. If resolved I do believe Jared could be good for NASA, and hopefully inspire and speed up NASA in a efficient yet responsible way for the new age in Space technology and exploration. If Jared Issacman is appointed hopefully he'll keep his promise to be a (Neutral) party as a NASA administrators are supposed to be.
Did Nasa not perfect the heat shield in the 1960s for moon landings, what a joke Artemis is, delay after delay what's next? answer cancel it now and pass to space x.
Maybe if Jared takes the helm he can do things more like SpaceX and a lot less like NASA has been doing it slow and govt like. Maybe Trump will get more money for them.
Poor Nelson chose his words as poorly: flying as a human rated craft doesn't necessarily correspond to the reliability for the task of the same, that which has been shown repeatedly in practice. How far the craft in question managed to travel is a non sequitur. Mentioning a partnership where one part exploits the gullibility of the companion due to a contract is commonly called embezzlement, fraud or parasitizing.
Space race ?? Why race? China planned these missions 15 years ago. Amd they have plan for next 20-30 years. They did it for their development and research and study of their own. They were denied in international space station so they built their own.
In the same year Nasa will be going to the moon, SpaceX is going send 8 uncrewed missions to Mars in preparation for manned missions at the next Earth-Mars transfer window.
SO 50 PLUS YEARS AGO THEY DID IT WITH A SHIP MADE FROM AL AND NO SPACE SHUTTLE TITLES NOW WITH A SHIP MADE FROM TI AND SPACE SHUTTLE TITLES IT BURNS UP WTF.
I just want to thank all the nsf crew for the always amazing job keeping us informed and inspired! Also always cool earrings, but those sls ones are amazing!!
Glad to see elysia back
OMG her earrings are EVERYTHING! 😲
Hey sometimes people need vacations haha
Orion emphasizes the point of the hardware-rich Starship test program (test like you fly, by ACTUALLY flying).
Great job Elysia! You bring these updates to life!!
A year to replace Orion heat Shield?
SpaceX: 30days, for a WAY bigger shield.
Yet they aren't going to replace it, but just change the return trajectory. Why even delay 7 months for only that?
@@Rosieplayz100NASA doesn't really have the budget to hire new people so a lot of things get put on hold to do other things. Just like in any company, when you have one guy doing 20 different things because he's the only one that knows how to do it, he's always getting pulled in every direction and just doesn't really get a lot done because everything is a priority. That and the sheer amount of testing that has to go into every single device is incredible. When I say testing, I don't mean just test. You have to come up with a full test plan on how you're going to test it. You have to get that approved. You test it. Then you have to write and issue a full report on how it tested with a success or failure. Now consider that you have 20 of these to do in the next few weeks. It's easy to see how things can get pushed aside for other things.
So they (again) delayed Artemis II by several months, and it now over a year away, but they are STILL not able to replace the heat shield in that time frame? Compared to NASA's Orion development, even Boeing's Starliner is fast.
Lol, only Spacex Starship is slower.
Vs a whole starship in a month
@@mrbaab5932 how do you figure? Orion and SLS both started way before Starship was a thing
I mean NASA only gets half a penny out of every tax dollar whereas Elon Musk makes like 300,000,000 dollars per hour
@@CentauriBros No, Musk does not make that. You need to really look into everything better. Musk's TOTAL value with everything he owns is 362B. However, he would have to sell everything to get access to that. And that value will drop as soon as he starts selling, which is what happened when he bought Twitter.
Stoke can't wait to see that!
Can't say I'm surprised to see another Artemis timeline slip. The whole thing was ludicrously paced from the start. Didn't get nearly the funding needed as well, even with a more sane timeline. SLS sucking up billions and billions didn't help either. On the one hand nice to see a more realistic timeline being put out, but politicians don't like to wait ( if it doesn't finish when they're in office, how will they benefit from it? ) so the longer it takes the more likely it'll get scrapped. Which would suck for a multitude of reasons
The move of Orbex to the Saxavord Spaceport was mainly due to the failure of the US ABL Space RS1 rocket program which was supposed to be the main regular launcher from the site.
As always fantastic updates. Thank you NSF team
Great presentation, and great editing. Well done.
Im really interested into how these heat shield issues didnt pop up on Orion's first test flight on a Delta IV, especially considering that was like half the point of the mission
They made major changes to the heatshield after that flight so it would be easier to install.
different flight profile, entry speed, etc.
A return from lunar orbit involves much more speed and therefore much greater heating on reentry rather than from a low earth orbit. You can see this by examining Apollo Command Modules that have returned from the moon and ones that have returned from LEO.
They switched from monolithic to block based heat shield between the two flights if I understood correct.
Test with real hardware and test often. NASA blowhard in chief insists SLS is crew-ready because his buddies in the Senate and the WH demand it after only a single test. Starship has now flown six times, but even that eternal optimist Elon Musk does not claim it will be ready for carrying passengers until after 100 test flights, that is about September 2026.
Thank you for all the hard work in making these excellent videos.
Thank you! Great update video
Those SLS earrings were quire the distraction lol
Please put in a timeline. Thank you.
tbh I really dont see the point in delaying artemis II.
It seems like all the reasons for delay have a solution to get around the idea of a delay.
JARED FOR NASA HELLL YAAAAA
At this point they may as well launch the astronauts on a Crew Dragon and rendezvous with Starship in LEO
Then the HLS would need a super-high-velocity heat shield it’s not currently designed for. There’s not enough Delta-V to sync back to Dragon in LEO coming back.
cant wait till theres too much space traffic to keep track of
Why does it take so long to fix? 4 years from Artemis 1 is way too long.
Not compared to Starship of SpaceX.
@@mrbaab5932 starship has launched like 6 times in about a year you doofus
@mrbaab5932 Even Starship took years longer and far more money than expected to fulfill its initial test flight.
@AlexBurgerTX Engineering challenges in spaceflight are mind numbingly difficult, with virtually no recourse for inaccuracy. Even the world’s best rocket engineers took years longer than anticipated on a virtually unlimited budget to complete a single Starship test flight.
there is a typo, at 10:50 she says s33 but the ship for ift7 is actualy s34
Nope, flight 7 is using Ship 33. Ship 34 is for flight 8
@ oh woops, i mustve been thinking of s32
Elysia, you're going to have to go on vacation after going over all those launches!
Nice compacting of the Artemis info in any case
Ps I watched it and the stream was hard to follow at many instances.
Plus how can can the not get a good conference place for the man in Germany.
Please just use headsets.
Hello from the Hope Inc, shelter in Fairmont West Virginia.
Hi
Lol, the third Scotland 🏴 spaceport is called 'Spaceport 1'.
13:18 So Scotland will have 3 spaceports next year? It looks like the space industry is booming up there, especially at Saxavord. 🙃
3 Spaceports with Zero flights so far.
Of course, the horses always have to be in front of the carriage. :) Spaceports first, then flights.
Falcon 9's diameter is a bit smaller than Orion...but would it - or Falcon Heavy - be capable of launching the Orion capsule on a Lunar Transfer Orbit instead of using SLS?
Nope
Not in current configuration.capsule itself weights 10.5t, with service module 26t. Dragon 2 weights 8.5 t. Falcon heavy can carry up to 26.9t to GTO, to mars 16.8t. MTO and LTO are quite.. similar. So let's say that to LTO fh can carry maybe 20t. So it's unlikely that fh could put Orion in lto,. On the other side, there are abandoned plans for using Dragon for lunar mission. Off there would be need to create proper service stage instead of trunk. And ofc human rating of falcon heavy. So at LEAST one flight with modifications.
Another abandoned SpaceX concept was that Raptor was developed initially to power falcon 9 second stage (in that time it was thought as hydrolox engine, not methalox). I have no idea how much Raptor had changed from initial concept, especially as for dimensions. But MAYBE it's possible to create new methalox second stage powered by much more efficient rvac variant. Probably it would require lot of changes in tower (fuel system is one thing, but probably methalox second stage will have to be simply bigger as methane is much less dense than kerosene).
Or maybe combination of those two approaches would be possible. Either way if that decision would be made, it would take probably 2 years to implement at best. Maybe to switch for Artemis 4.
SLS money has already been spent. Chopping the program will just mean that Boeing will have a lot of cool junk to destroy.
Boeing needs to build airplanes, not spaceships.
Even beyond the heat shield issue, Artemis2 is dangerous because Artemis1 did NOT have a fully functional life support system. A full life support + unmanned flight needs to go up FIRST.
My comment disappeared?
Great earrings Elysia, impressive you made them yourself! Definitely start a store! 🙂
NASA takes a year to replace Orion's heat shield?
Its shocking to me that theres space geeks who dont get or understand this selection for NASA head. A space geek that loves NASA thats well respected, and that's spent millions of his own money going to space, taking people with him to space, and doing science in space.
But most importantly over 100 billion has been spent on the SLS which is year behind, not close to ready, and has flown once. And when its ready its going to cost 4 billion per flight (originally claimed was 0.5 to 2B).
In comparison in the space of only a few years and with 5 billion Space X has got Starship flying (doing what the disposable SLS needs to do) and is further being developed to make its rapidly reusable and ready for in space refueling. Thats like watching a person rip past you on their speed boat, while you use one oar to row your two oar rowing boat!!
BILL NELSON was so lovely man so polite and considering who try not to go around the POLICY....
For the sake of the Artemis program, and achieving its goals, the SLS needs to step aside and use the private sector.
W vid
NASA is Roscosmos lite, can you imagine if commercial space never took off? this moon program is saying "i would rather hand away the moon to chinese than admit we screwed up and start over" this is what polititcal and bureaucratic enshitification looks like.
Isaacman was planning to pay for a Starship to emulate Artemis II by sending a crew around the Moon. Now he will be able to get Congress to help fund the mission.
My one concern is that neither Trump nor Isaacman control the NASA budget. That is in the hands of Congress. Why would Congress cancel a program that funds a hundred thousand jobs across America, even if it makes no economic sense. In particular I do not believe Artemis II and III are vulnerable. The earliest mission that can be bypassed is Artemis IV.
My thoughts exactly the same. Probably scrapping SLS block 1b/2 in favour of commercial flight (Starship, but also fh/dragon, or maybe something else)
Where did Elysia get her ear rings from. As I like to have ones like them.
bravo
Refreshing to hear someone talk about something tangentially related to politics without there being a major bias for or against it. People obsess over politics yet no one actually understands it.
Cool
Me: So you can't replace the heat shield because it would take an entire year?
NASA: Right.
Me: Than why are you postponing Artemis FOR 7 MONTHS??
ULA, don't think the cost works. But an inflatable, steerable, strap on heat shield, would be worth a fortune.
👍👍👍
Amazing that NASA can't build a capsule in year and a half. No excuse will make it make sense.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤
haha new from Iran from rYan 😅😅
I'll get my coat
What up
Jared and Elon will get it dealt with.
Pair of twonks.
A lack of a budget and planning to hire new people mixed with a long-term hiring freeze and a tendency to use contractors is resulting in a massive amount of people retiring. Essentially the same group of people has moved all through the space program and are now aging and retiring. This is going to result in a massive amount of lost knowledge very soon because there were no people to hand it down to.
Yup. SpaceX is burning people down, but also is getting most of talents and passionates. Because in spx there is at least feeling that it matter what you do as engineer. And ofc are also other space startups that also are taking lot of talents.
No bad fealing.... that abou sertified is just formality,,,, that what governent do....
Artemis 3…..2028 or 2029
It will be delayed to 2033
That's a very reasonable time-line. I think Art 4 will be delayed until 2033. It has to use Mobile Launcher 2 which was originally scheduled for a delivery of March 2023 at a cost under 500 million. In December of 2023 NASA estimated the cost to be 1.5 billion with a delivery of November 2026. Then NASA's Office of Inspector General did an audit and determined the cost could reach 2.7 billion, more than 5X the original planned cost AND due to the time required for NASA to prepare the Launcher, it would not be ready to support a launch until spring of 2029. So, 6yrs delayed and 2.2 billion over budget. Lol NASA is a joke.
@@fergalhennessy775 IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN
All of the emissions to do a mission like this, and worrying about what hazardous chemicals burns off during reentry is crazy. Some hippy is going to get someone killed.
Tragedy of the commons
In other news, let’s get back to when lead was the basis for color pigmentation in paint! Those colors held up great over the years. The new water base pigments are junk and you have to replace signs every few years because people can’t read them anymore driving by. Those dangumned hippies!!!! By the way, Why did crime skyrocket in that time frame lead paint and gasoline was legal, and then plummet after the hippies got their way???????
NASA state it would take them a year to replace Artemis heatshield, SpaceX replaced the much, much larger Starship heatshield in thee weeks! That about sums up the inefficiency of NASA today. Hopefully Jaraed Isaacman will quickly scrap SLS and make changes to make NASA fit for purpose just like it used to be. (Love your ‘droppers’ Elysia.😊)
It took a lot longer for SpaceX to design the new heat shield. Also, it may not be able to withstand Moon return velocities. It would need to be tested and verified, which would require a test flight a la Artemis I, which would require tanker flights that are still years away.
You obviously don't understand the difference in returning from LEO and returning from the moon. Elon is counting on your ignorance to get what he wants.
@@stephenwhite4257 He's counting on ignorance to get what he wants? How so?
Tiles and a PICA heat shield are nt the same thing. It would seem you don't really understand what's actually going on.
Please try electronic rocket please sir please
Bill Nelson: don't let the door hit you on the way out.
NASA update - they admit they are incompetent.
Unlike SpaceX Starship.
I don't think either of you have a clue..
@imaginary_friend7300 Sorry for making you think
👾👍👾
Artemis is a joke.
Artemis was a reasonable plan if it would have been done on time and on budget. Now is time to kill off SLS & Lunar Gateway.
Time for Artemis to evolve into Artemis Lunar Direct with Starship HLS fueled in LEO.
China does not ask for any races, they're just stepping on their own pace
Artemis or SLS?
SLS agreed, but Artemis is essential for the creation of many technologies.
But, not as big of a joke as Starship.
@ you’re not serious right?
What is the status of launches 🚀 from India?
One
Two
@@HughMannthree
Bye bye SLS! Bye bye senator ballast!
Please just get me into like a nasa rumpus room or something I promise I'll help all sorts of problems
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤N❤
51 dislikes 1 hour in? they must say so controversial stuff in this video
Dislikes extension is fake, it rounds up based on their users' view count and dislikes and the official view count.
This makes the result very biased. Dislikes are usually lower than it says.
or people hitting the wrong button ( since they're next to each other ) or flat earth morons, or trolls that just hit dislike because they can then move on without watching, etc.
Icaacman please fix the things wrong with NASA provided you get the job.
I don't think Isaacman gets confirmed.
First off, you can kiss any Polaris mission goodbye, not because he flies on it, but because he funds it, and that will land him in legal trouble if it goes because it'll be seen as him using taxpayer dollars for something Congress did not approve, using the same precedent as Trump's businesses.
Secondly, many of the Senators want these go-nowhere projects for their states because it means "job security". One of the worst jobs in my personal opinion and I'll never go back to defense contractors for that reason, but so be it.
Thirdly, it's a Trump nomination. Automatically, every single Democrat is a "no" vote. Combine with number two and he's not getting in.
Your name should be on screen for the entire show, IMO.
What are NASA thinking, a year to replace the heatshield when SpaceX can do the same in a week. The other question is why are they not using SpaceX heatshield as their product is decade's ahead of the tech being used by NASA?
We still do not know if SpaceX’s heat shield could withstand lunar entry velocities. LEO is a cakewalk.
Starship lunar vehicle to orbit receives full fuel.Falcon 9 takes crew up to orbit and to the starship. Starship does mission to Moon and back. Falcon 9 brings crew back down to earth. the current NASA administrator is too stupid to understand that if it's human rated to go from lunar gateway to their surface of the Moon then it's human rated to go from Earth orbit to the Moon and back.
Un passo avanti !!!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
There’s not enough delta-v on HLS to brake in LEO to dock with Dragon after the moon landing. So you would need a heat shield on HLS, and entering from moon velocity is a different dragon than suborbital hops.
And your stupid for making such a stupid comment.
@@EMichaelBall thanks for the excellent explanation
@@gregsutton2400 The problem is a lot of you seem to think administrator means dictator. Congress holds the purse strings. That's who decides what is funded.
I'm (NOT) nessassary against Jared Issacman being appointed to NASA.
However Isaacman simply resigning as CEO of Shift4 isn't enough to prevent massive conflicts of interest, as he owns atleast 30% of Shift4 and they purchased over 27 million in (SpaceX stocks), and have made millions since then, from that investment.
This means Jared isn't just friends with Elon Musk.
He has a (significant personal financial interest in SpaceX success.)
That must change.
That's an unexceptable conflict of interest to any rational/ethical person, and Jared resigning as CEO of Shift4 does nothing to fix that big problem.
Otherwise What's there to stop Jared as NASA administrator from making significant personal profits by favoring SpaceX for NASA contracts and sabotaging/preventing other companies from competing with SpaceX? I'm not saying he would definitely do that, but the massive conflict still exists at this point.
So for his NASA appointment to seem remotely legitimate Isaacman must sell all his Shift4/SpaceX shares/stocks.
Yes it would clearly be unethical for him to be the NASA administrator if he's still making profit from SpaceX/Shift4.
As I said Im not against Isaacman being NASA administrator aslong as this massive conflict of interest is (resolved properly) and not simply ignored during the confirmation process.
If resolved I do believe Jared could be good for NASA, and hopefully inspire and speed up NASA in a efficient yet responsible way for the new age in Space technology and exploration.
If Jared Issacman is appointed hopefully he'll keep his promise to be a (Neutral) party as a NASA administrators are supposed to be.
Did Nasa not perfect the heat shield in the 1960s for moon landings, what a joke Artemis is, delay after delay what's next? answer cancel it now and pass to space x.
Maybe if Jared takes the helm he can do things more like SpaceX and a lot less like NASA has been doing it slow and govt like. Maybe Trump will get more money for them.
Jared will do Elon's bidding.
Poor Nelson chose his words as poorly: flying as a human rated craft doesn't necessarily correspond to the reliability for the task of the same, that which has been shown repeatedly in practice. How far the craft in question managed to travel is a non sequitur.
Mentioning a partnership where one part exploits the gullibility of the companion due to a contract is commonly called embezzlement, fraud or parasitizing.
Artemis should have been ditched years ago!
I just hope SpaceX doesn’t get preferential treatment
"Named nominee"? Wow, that's horrible writing. The word is "nominated."
Non-native English speaking writer(s?)
Intersting how Isaacman got appointed when Musk economically endorsed Trump's campaign; does anyone else see a pattern here?
Still got the best guy
@EMichaelBall Could be. Hopefully his integrity maintains through.
Space race ?? Why race? China planned these missions 15 years ago. Amd they have plan for next 20-30 years. They did it for their development and research and study of their own. They were denied in international space station so they built their own.
In the same year Nasa will be going to the moon, SpaceX is going send 8 uncrewed missions to Mars in preparation for manned missions at the next Earth-Mars transfer window.
We’re going to have full self driving on Tesla vehicles by the end of the year. Promise! - Elon in 2019
SO 50 PLUS YEARS AGO THEY DID IT WITH A SHIP MADE FROM AL AND NO SPACE SHUTTLE TITLES NOW WITH A SHIP MADE FROM TI AND SPACE SHUTTLE TITLES IT BURNS UP WTF.
...you're not being clear.
Orion is aluminum too and just because you say this nonsense in all caps it won't make it any more right
@@ale131296ART A MESS IS MADE FROM TI NOT AL DUMMY
BLA - BLA - BLA. Dear lord, slow down. We can't keep up
chung junk
Again... i'd love to watchthis, but I can not stand this presenter.
Gotta steal another Zimmer Frame for "J-rod" to hold on to ?