Laozi and Quantum Physics: Shantena Sabbadini

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @davidstrevens9170
    @davidstrevens9170 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Finally!
    Someone who's willing to acknowledge that the wave function doesn't need to collapse in order for relative knowing/perception to be mentally projected.
    This guy is willing to interpret the consequences of what physicists have acknowledged thus far.
    Baby steps.
    Humans are resistant to change.
    And for good reason.
    Nobody wants to feel unsafe.

  • @ramseypietronasser2
    @ramseypietronasser2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great

  • @brianhughes6462
    @brianhughes6462 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The gentleman is explaining simply that quantum physics is now seeing what the Seers of ancient India saw long ago. The west is just a little slow on the draw.

  • @yrasphong
    @yrasphong 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Through Buddhism I have been learning more of the value of quantum physics

  • @susanwoodward7485
    @susanwoodward7485 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Resonance, reflection, relationship -> reality

  • @fineasfrog
    @fineasfrog 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Okay, it appears we can't do without the split of subject-object knowing but the question is to what extent can we know without that split? Maybe we have yet to realize that there is a way of knowing that is prior to the split.
    There is this question: can we grok our own conscious and so not be separate from it? Or to what degree can we see beyond the subject-object knowing with a kind of Unitive knowing? In this realization the unitive knowing is knowing through us or what we used to think we were. In other words, what self or entity that we only appear to be when we know, see and identify our self with and by way of the subject-object mode of knowing. Ordinarily with the subject-object mode of knowing we see a sharpe and hard line betwee "in here" and "out there". Might it be that this barrier between 'in here' and 'out there can be made softer or thinner or more fuzzy or more permeable? It is if Tao or consciousness veils itself to know particularizations of the unknown potential that is one and whole. What this is can't be said except in a relative way so we call it Tao that can't be expressed.

  • @Acke1974
    @Acke1974 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holding them together. Is that how you crate ripples, in the space time continuum, that alter realities in the 3rd dimension?
    Resonates within ✨

  • @gracev4186
    @gracev4186 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🌄 Yes 🌈 Yes 🦋Yes 💕 holding them together is the WONDER of All Wonders.💔💝💫💌 Grace Victoria 🌹

  • @juliavanrun-kilic1744
    @juliavanrun-kilic1744 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If waves don’t collapse into particles once observed, how is matter created then🤔? Also: I’m wondering if and how information can be erased? Maybe overwritten?🤔. What a wonderful interview. Would love to learn more from this gentleman’s insights🙏🏻💫

    • @laisa.
      @laisa. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Search for Bernardo Kastrup, he explains how waves and particles are a part of the quantum field, not as matter.

  • @dr.niluferrahman8524
    @dr.niluferrahman8524 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not for the mere mortal to grasp he is saying.have to go really deep to understand it.thankyou

  • @gracev4186
    @gracev4186 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🎶Bob Dylan "Make you feel My Love"🌈

  • @paldenngodup8238
    @paldenngodup8238 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What will birth without death look like
    or death without birth look like?
    Is consciousness without birth and death
    the Ultimate Reality?

    • @robertjsmith
      @robertjsmith 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      consciousness is an illusion

    • @kararrsameer9243
      @kararrsameer9243 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertjsmith can you explain that?

    • @robertjsmith
      @robertjsmith 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kararrsameer9243 it cannot be found as a inherently existing thing

    • @paldenngodup8238
      @paldenngodup8238 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is perception an illusion?
      What is the difference between
      consciousness and perception?

    • @robertjsmith
      @robertjsmith 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@paldenngodup8238 words and concepts dont point to inherently real things
      you cant stick a permanent label on something that is changing all the time
      but as we have to use concepts and words
      Consciousness,awareness,experience,are the same
      is there a YOU seeing a sight ?

  • @donnacabot3550
    @donnacabot3550 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    E(J)=mc2

  • @yosaakshi
    @yosaakshi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    doesnt it proves one thing, we should focus on the subject..not the object

  • @caravaggiosaccomplice7841
    @caravaggiosaccomplice7841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What he's trying to tell you is he's been studying reality for 50 years and hasn't the faintest idea what it is and probably couldn't tell you what it is even if he knew. So what's for dinner?

    • @mickmcmahon545
      @mickmcmahon545 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You've had your dinner, now wash your bowl..

    • @juliavanrun-kilic1744
      @juliavanrun-kilic1744 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hope your dinner was nice☺️. I have learned to be careful in judging something I don’t understand or that does not make sense to me. We all live in our own experience and perspective of what we call life here on earth. Were you born on another planet (or even on a different part of this earth), things we do here wouldn’t work or would make no sense. Also the notion of time would be very different, or absent. Difficult to wrap our heads around whilst here on earth. The heart can understand something the mind cannot (yet) grasp, so we can feel that we resonate without our mind understanding the why or how.... If we don’t understand or resonate, indeed dinner is more interesting..As we open our hearts and minds to what this gentleman is saying, we might be surprised by the nature of the reality that we experience. Questioning things that we think we know, is a possibility in learning and coming to a different understanding🙃!