INTEGRITY IS BASED ON THE ACTION! In this case not following the rulesand deliberate circumvention of the law and rules is indeed s questionif integrity!!!!
Palusot nya nag transfer vya ng bahay 7 times kaya wala cyang kopya sa na file na SALN sabi ni Sereno mahiya ka ang babaw naman ng rason mo para kang nagsalita sa mga kinder😂😂😂😂
sabi ni SIRAULO SERENO SA dissenting opinion nya noon sa PS BANK na NON FILING OF SALN is a prima facie evidence of ill gotten wealth hahahahaha....bakit hindi yan pwd i apply sa sarili mo lukaret sisang baliw SERENO hahahaha
Arceli Ferreras tama.. we will pray na manaig ang kampon ni Satanas.. at wag maimpeach!..ang kasabihang "U reaped what U sowed" saan man naroon c CJ Corona.. im sure matutuwa xa kc ang hustisya ay ginagawad sa mga ulupong at sakim gata ni Sereno! Ang ksalanan ni Corona.. gusto nia ibalik an hacienda Luisita.. yan ang punot dulo kung bkit xa pnaranggal ni Panot Aquino as CJ
Labas nio nalang mga saln nio...ung isa 39 saln dapat ifile tpos 15 lang ang nafile...ung isa wala namang maipakitang nag file...hanapan ng hanapan ng butas...parepareho namang??di ko lam kung sinungaling b ung isa o inggit ung isa....ilabas nio nalang parepareho para patas
Ibig ba sabihin nSereno.. kung ang ordinaryong nars ng PGH ..ay di nka submit ng SALN .. tanggal agad sa work.. Pag chief Justice ok lang lumabag at 3 piraso SALN .. (peke pa yun dlawang SALN ni Sereno) .. ganun ba d2 sa Pinas.ang batas pra sa mahihirap lang...? Just asking....
Bawat administration, yung naiiwang nsa posisyon matira ang matibay., after sereno cnu next? Maybe ombudsman., sa observation ko same lng nangyari s panahon ni panot., napatalsik yung cj at ombudsman.
Si Corona, nagpasa ng SALN kulang... Natanggal(pero actually pinagiinitan siya sa decision sa Hacienda Luisita) Si Sereno... Walang SALN.... Hahaha Asa ka pa.
PRANG BATA C SERENO...SABI NG TEACHER.GWIN NINYO ANG ASSIGNMENT.LHAT SUMONOD MLIBAN KAY SERENO.KYA NKPSA SYA.DHIL PRINCIPAL NG SCHOOL ANG TATAY NYANG AQUINO.PART 1
THE CHIEF JUSTICE WAS EXCELLENT IN THE ORAL ARGUMENTS. I agree with the CJ that a justice's interpretation of how the SALN was to be submitted was a "unique" interpretation that is absurd and oppressive. It was a nitpicking exercise and an attempt to read "opinions" of the CJ out of context. And I agree with the CJ that the quo warranto was never about ill-gotten wealth and so how did that come about in the questioning of at least one justice. Mukhang the issues are continually mushrooming at every point. And another issue came up which was her position in the Human Rights Commission which prompted the CJ to question the proceeding as "global roaming". Kahit ano na lang tinatanong to the point that the CJ said baka yung high school records nya gusto na rin tanungin. When CJ responded to Justice De Castro that "You have a self-serving statement.", I agree. Self-serving statement is not evidence. "It is important that the context be laid down" on the questions and should not be an exercise to "trap" the Chief Justice. That is the best description made by CJ on how the questioning was being done by a particular justice. CJ was remarkably answering with facts but a justice was stating a "unique" interpretation.. Sabi ni Justice Teresita de Castro on the meaning of the law: "From my reading of the law, that is my conclusion". PERO that is her conclusion. Did it occur to her that her conclusion may be wrong and that the reading of Chief Justice Sereno was correct? I believe CJ's interpertation is within the spirit of the law. When Justice Peralta asked the Solicitor General on the earnings of the CJ because of her being a consultant of PIATCO, the Solicitor General cannot answer directly and with any particularity. In fact there was no substantial answer at all. It was Justice Peralta who came up with the arguments contained in his questions and the Solicitor General can only answer "yes your Honor." In short , it was NOT the solicitor general who made an argument. There was no argument on his part at all. The burden of proof and evidence to prove that CJ did not file a SALN rests on the shoulders of the Solicitor General. Justice Jardeleza should have asked Sol Gen of the proofs of the allegations. Jardeleza also referred to the slide of the OSG, but that was not evidence of non-filing. Its merely a slide. The burden of the proof is on the Sol Gen to prove the allegations and the content of the slide. The CJ was correct in reminding Justice Jardeleza that the burden of proof is on the Solicitor General. There was no shift in the burden of evidence either because the Sol Gen did not prove anything. That is just my take. -FEU LAW DEAN
the burden of PROOF SHIFTED TO SIRAULO SERENO kasi SOLGEN CALIDA has evidence OF CERTIFICATION FROM UP and also CERTIFICATION FROM OMBUDSMAN THAT SERENO did not file SALN..nag shift po baklang abnoynoy
sabi ni SIRAULO SERENO SA dissenting opinion nya noon sa PS BANK na NON FILING OF SALN is a prima facie evidence of ill gotten wealth hahahahaha....bakit hindi yan pwd i apply sa sarili mo lukaret sisang baliw SERENO hahahaha
authenticated po ang EVIDENCE NI SOLGEN CALIDA NA CERTIFICATION FROM UP..and CERTIFICATION FROM OMBUDSMAN...the burden of proof shifted so SIRAULO SISANG BALIW SERENO hahahaha...appointed ni baklang abnoynoy panot kaya mga puro may KATOK SA ULO hahahahaha
It is clear. You are required by law to submit SALNs....You disregarded the law.. Nagtututuro ka e ikaw ang nakasalang. Pati si CJCorona ay sinisi mo for not reminding you re your SALNs. Itong klase pala ng tao ang binibigyan ng parangal at standing ovation ng mga ilang grupo?
sabi ni SIRAULO SERENO SA dissenting opinion nya noon sa PS BANK na NON FILING OF SALN is a prima facie evidence of ill gotten wealth hahahahaha....bakit hindi yan pwd i apply sa sarili mo lukaret sisang baliw SERENO hahahaha
You mean the best sa pagka kapal ng mukha. Sabihin mo sa the best Chief ever mo na mag resign na, di na sya nahiya ayaw na ng taumbayan sa kanya pero pinag si-siksikan parin nya sarili nya, sinasayang nya lang pera ng taong bayan pansahod sa kanya eh wala namang nagawa, puro daldal, maka Diyos kuno hah!
Hay,naku ! Sera no,ay sereno saan na kya napapunta un kunsencya mo cguro sa talampakan,hano! Sukang suka na sa mga pnagsasav mo kapit tuko ka pa din at bayawak sa higpit ng pagkakapit sa upuan mo,,,,,
Ang problema kc sa Pilipinas ayaw magpatalo lalo na pag nasapawan .... tulad na nga lang sa mga Senior Justice na d napiling CJ kaya kontra banat sila kay CJ Sereno..... Dapat ang gisahin nila ang JBC na syang gumawa ng short list sa pagka CJ ....
@@alvinaldea4625 she was a Chief Justice. She has been appointed as Chief Justice. CJ that replaced her could also be removed by QW because CJ De Castro has also missing SALNs. Her removal through QW was first of its kind in PH due to political atmosphere. Her removal though was not meritorious after all - look at the Supreme Court now. Better are those who dont have eyes that can see than those with eyes that cannot see.
Babaw ng SALN issue.
Ganon din ginawa kay Corona noon ang kaibahan mga bayad na senador ang naghatol noon kay CJ Corona samantalang kay Sereno mga kapwa niya Mahistrado.
you can tell how sereno was below par in defending herself.
Ay sus pare pareho lng kayo..wala di corrupt sa gobyerno.
Honesty and truthfulness. Constitute Integrity.
Hay naku ma'am sereno, tinatanong ka ng mga majestrado wala kang karaparatan mag tanong!
answer the question Cj Sereno. ikaw ang iniimbistigahan.
INTEGRITY IS BASED ON THE ACTION! In this case not following the rulesand deliberate circumvention of the law and rules is indeed s questionif integrity!!!!
SERENO. LAKAS. NG. TAMA. MO .....
Palusot nya nag transfer vya ng bahay 7 times kaya wala cyang kopya sa na file na SALN sabi ni Sereno mahiya ka ang babaw naman ng rason mo para kang nagsalita sa mga kinder😂😂😂😂
Go Chief Justice Sereno we will pray for you.
sabi ni SIRAULO SERENO SA dissenting opinion nya noon sa PS BANK na NON FILING OF SALN is a prima facie evidence of ill gotten wealth hahahahaha....bakit hindi yan pwd i apply sa sarili mo lukaret sisang baliw SERENO hahahaha
Arceli Ferreras tama.. we will pray na manaig ang kampon ni Satanas.. at wag maimpeach!..ang kasabihang "U reaped what U sowed" saan man naroon c CJ Corona.. im sure matutuwa xa kc ang hustisya ay ginagawad sa mga ulupong at sakim gata ni Sereno! Ang ksalanan ni Corona.. gusto nia ibalik an hacienda Luisita.. yan ang punot dulo kung bkit xa pnaranggal ni Panot Aquino as CJ
Adrianne Ferrer haha
Labas nio nalang mga saln nio...ung isa 39 saln dapat ifile tpos 15 lang ang nafile...ung isa wala namang maipakitang nag file...hanapan ng hanapan ng butas...parepareho namang??di ko lam kung sinungaling b ung isa o inggit ung isa....ilabas nio nalang parepareho para patas
At least 10 SALNs are enough
Ibig ba sabihin nSereno.. kung ang ordinaryong nars ng PGH ..ay di nka submit ng SALN .. tanggal agad sa work..
Pag chief Justice ok lang lumabag at 3 piraso SALN .. (peke pa yun dlawang SALN ni Sereno) .. ganun ba d2 sa Pinas.ang batas pra sa mahihirap lang...? Just asking....
Bawat administration, yung naiiwang nsa posisyon matira ang matibay., after sereno cnu next? Maybe ombudsman., sa observation ko same lng nangyari s panahon ni panot., napatalsik yung cj at ombudsman.
Salamat Naman kasi si corona dati pina talsik din sa manahon ni noy noy!!
ANG SALN...SA KORTE.
news today
I support CJ Sereno
Si Corona, nagpasa ng SALN kulang... Natanggal(pero actually pinagiinitan siya sa decision sa Hacienda Luisita) Si Sereno... Walang SALN.... Hahaha Asa ka pa.
PRANG BATA C SERENO...SABI NG TEACHER.GWIN NINYO ANG ASSIGNMENT.LHAT SUMONOD MLIBAN KAY SERENO.KYA NKPSA SYA.DHIL PRINCIPAL NG SCHOOL ANG TATAY NYANG AQUINO.PART 1
Tahulqn ang mga aso at ingitiro.
Kung makasagot baliw nga, yeah shes so arrogant and ipokrita may sayad nga tsupi na oi.
Hahaha wala pang hunyo talsik na c sereno u know hahahah
THE CHIEF JUSTICE WAS EXCELLENT IN THE ORAL ARGUMENTS. I agree with the CJ that a justice's interpretation of how the SALN was to be submitted was a "unique" interpretation that is absurd and oppressive. It was a nitpicking exercise and an attempt to read "opinions" of the CJ out of context. And I agree with the CJ that the quo warranto was never about ill-gotten wealth and so how did that come about in the questioning of at least one justice. Mukhang the issues are continually mushrooming at every point. And another issue came up which was her position in the Human Rights Commission which prompted the CJ to question the proceeding as "global roaming". Kahit ano na lang tinatanong to the point that the CJ said baka yung high school records nya gusto na rin tanungin.
When CJ responded to Justice De Castro that "You have a self-serving statement.", I agree. Self-serving statement is not evidence.
"It is important that the context be laid down" on the questions and should not be an exercise to "trap" the Chief Justice. That is the best description made by CJ on how the questioning was being done by a particular justice. CJ was remarkably answering with facts but a justice was stating a "unique" interpretation..
Sabi ni Justice Teresita de Castro on the meaning of the law: "From my reading of the law, that is my conclusion". PERO that is her conclusion. Did it occur to her that her conclusion may be wrong and that the reading of Chief Justice Sereno was correct? I believe CJ's interpertation is within the spirit of the law.
When Justice Peralta asked the Solicitor General on the earnings of the CJ because of her being a consultant of PIATCO, the Solicitor General cannot answer directly and with any particularity. In fact there was no substantial answer at all. It was Justice Peralta who came up with the arguments contained in his questions and the Solicitor General can only answer "yes your Honor." In short , it was NOT the solicitor general who made an argument. There was no argument on his part at all.
The burden of proof and evidence to prove that CJ did not file a SALN rests on the shoulders of the Solicitor General. Justice Jardeleza should have asked Sol Gen of the proofs of the allegations. Jardeleza also referred to the slide of the OSG, but that was not evidence of non-filing. Its merely a slide. The burden of the proof is on the Sol Gen to prove the allegations and the content of the slide. The CJ was correct in reminding Justice Jardeleza that the burden of proof is on the Solicitor General. There was no shift in the burden of evidence either because the Sol Gen did not prove anything. That is just my take.
-FEU LAW DEAN
the burden of PROOF SHIFTED TO SIRAULO SERENO kasi SOLGEN CALIDA has evidence OF CERTIFICATION FROM UP and also CERTIFICATION FROM OMBUDSMAN THAT SERENO did not file SALN..nag shift po baklang abnoynoy
sabi ni SIRAULO SERENO SA dissenting opinion nya noon sa PS BANK na NON FILING OF SALN is a prima facie evidence of ill gotten wealth hahahahaha....bakit hindi yan pwd i apply sa sarili mo lukaret sisang baliw SERENO hahahaha
authenticated po ang EVIDENCE NI SOLGEN CALIDA NA CERTIFICATION FROM UP..and CERTIFICATION FROM OMBUDSMAN...the burden of proof shifted so SIRAULO SISANG BALIW SERENO hahahaha...appointed ni baklang abnoynoy panot kaya mga puro may KATOK SA ULO hahahahaha
palusot lang ang abnoynoy SIRA-NO mo..tulad ng amo nyang baklang abnoynoy panot ...hahahaha
si Sereno CJ na inventor pa.
Doblada ka dyan ni hindi nga decree yan at talo sya sa kaso.
It is clear. You are required by law to submit SALNs....You disregarded the law..
Nagtututuro ka e ikaw ang nakasalang. Pati si CJCorona ay sinisi mo for not reminding you re your SALNs. Itong klase pala ng tao ang binibigyan ng parangal at standing ovation ng mga ilang grupo?
Sereno has explained herself well... They're just taking this matter politically...
God bless Chief Justice Sereno! We will pray for you and the entire court to let Justice, Truth and Righteous will set you free
Yo go gurl! Sereno you are the best Chief ever!!! You all are just jealous :P
sabi ni SIRAULO SERENO SA dissenting opinion nya noon sa PS BANK na NON FILING OF SALN is a prima facie evidence of ill gotten wealth hahahahaha....bakit hindi yan pwd i apply sa sarili mo lukaret sisang baliw SERENO hahahaha
You mean the best sa pagka kapal ng mukha. Sabihin mo sa the best Chief ever mo na mag resign na, di na sya nahiya ayaw na ng taumbayan sa kanya pero pinag si-siksikan parin nya sarili nya, sinasayang nya lang pera ng taong bayan pansahod sa kanya eh wala namang nagawa, puro daldal, maka Diyos kuno hah!
Hay,naku ! Sera no,ay sereno saan na kya napapunta un kunsencya mo cguro sa talampakan,hano! Sukang suka na sa mga pnagsasav mo kapit tuko ka pa din at bayawak sa higpit ng pagkakapit sa upuan mo,,,,,
She’s the one in trial yet she has the gall to pose question baligtad lol
Sino ba iniimpeach dito? Si de Castro ba or c sereno..Ang isyu..ay di c Sereno qyalified at null and void ang appointment. .ni kapalmuks Sereno
paano ba naging chief justice itong sereno. mukhang boobita sa mga palusot na sagot nya.
Ang problema kc sa Pilipinas ayaw magpatalo lalo na pag nasapawan .... tulad na nga lang sa mga Senior Justice na d napiling CJ kaya kontra banat sila kay CJ Sereno..... Dapat ang gisahin nila ang JBC na syang gumawa ng short list sa pagka CJ ....
Sereno kinainggitan ka lanv ni de castro kasi mas nauna ka maging cj kay sa kanya kaya... Panataksik ka niya... Para siya ang pumalit
DOBLADA, DOBALADA NA NAMAN, ANO BA YAN? WHERE IS/ARE THE SALN? Sal-it!
ang kapal ng mukha ni de castro
Those who prosecuted CJ Sereno - some already had COVID and gone already.
What you sow shall you reap!
A CJ that never was. Lol
@@alvinaldea4625 she was a Chief Justice. She has been appointed as Chief Justice. CJ that replaced her could also be removed by QW because CJ De Castro has also missing SALNs.
Her removal through QW was first of its kind in PH due to political atmosphere. Her removal though was not meritorious after all - look at the Supreme Court now.
Better are those who dont have eyes that can see than those with eyes that cannot see.
Matapang si Sereno mananalo dito sa Qua Warranto case.
Quo warranto yun tsaka natalo siya