2024 Toyota Alphard Crash and Safety Tests

[@4DriveTime]

Subscribe now 👉 goo.gl/M7yJtf
Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications

[@Toyotaaustrailia]

You testing new alphard

[@SteelBird1000]

side crash always leads to roll-over.

[@当たり前のように向かえる1日]

無断転載？

[@DanielCamacho-h1n]

Well done❤

[@zeroxzero159]

Now crash using Euro NCAP level testing.

[@mro_software]

these tests are harder than euro ncap

[@zeroxzero159]

@@mro_software really? I don't think so

[@xdriffatxd4196]

But they are tho​@@zeroxzero159

[@tlplayz_ytc8501]

@@mro_softwarenice joke

[@小屁股-l5x]

looks as dangerous as previously

[@SwordyMinecraftPlaysReal]

While Its Better

[@yuaninigoguamos6720]

Vans are better, its because the engine is in the cab (some vans)

[@tashanglong]

This video presents a misleading impression, akin to a Japanese-style illusion.
The 100% frontal collision test employs a wall constructed of hollow steel reinforcement. Upon closer examination at reduced playback speed, one can discern slight undulations, indicating that the wall itself absorbs a significant amount of the impact energy. This is not representative of real-world collision scenarios.
In the 50% offset frontal collision test, the striking object is equipped with a metal buffer zone of approximately one meter in length. Despite this substantial cushioning element, the vehicle's body sustains severe damage, with the passenger compartment experiencing significant intrusion. This outcome raises questions about the vehicle's structural integrity and occupant protection capabilities.

[@AndiSuwito-z1p]

test with Alphard

[@Durple_fromsprunki]

Bro why did you destroy my favorite car😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

[@SwordyAVReal]

Do you not care about your safety?

[@karimsakine7]

Dbh

[@MR_PY_CHEW]

Safety sucks

[@Punny95]

Well that means your gonna die without safety

[@SwordyAVReal]

The alphard got the best rating in these tests idk how your saying the safety sucks

[@Punny95]

@@SwordyAVReal real