Can creationists explain Neanderthals?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 193

  • @GeneralKato
    @GeneralKato 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They were us, inclusive, not separate. They just grew older than we do today.

  • @krimbii
    @krimbii 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    You’re not allowed to say it but there are neanderhals still alive on this planet. I’ll leave it at that.

    • @andrewwitchell2708
      @andrewwitchell2708 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha mouth breathing nuckle draggers

  • @Mike-sv2nu
    @Mike-sv2nu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    "The other people will kill me" - Cain.

    • @wesleycolemanmusic
      @wesleycolemanmusic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      His siblings.

    • @TheApologeticsCorner
      @TheApologeticsCorner 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He had siblings who just so happened to have a sibling kill one of their siblings.

  • @simonhawkins1892
    @simonhawkins1892 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Why do people expect the Bible to explain Neanderthal man? It doesn't explain squirrels or kangaroos, it doesn't explain Arabica monkies or tree sloths

    • @brandonlamitina7588
      @brandonlamitina7588 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not quite the same thing, these beings were sentient. Animals are a different kind of thing, according to Genesis. It's another species, God said he created one man and one woman. I think it's worth some explanation, but it doesn't shake my faith in any way.

    • @KentPetersonmoney
      @KentPetersonmoney 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe Neanderthal were preflood people

    • @simonhawkins1892
      @simonhawkins1892 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @MightyCdG Neanderthals were 5'5" at the upper limits. Not exactly giants.
      Try to keep your intelligence inside your own head. please, I'm only thinking of you

    • @simonhawkins1892
      @simonhawkins1892 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MightyCdG they were the GIANT sons of angels and women.
      Neanderthals were 5'5" at their biggest. Any paper or TH-cam video on early human or Neanderthals would have told you that they were shorter than Homo Sapiens.

    • @simonhawkins1892
      @simonhawkins1892 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @brandonlamitina7588 Sorry, but we are not the same species. We are 2 species that share a common ancestor. It doesn't take much of a search to prove that

  • @seanb5724
    @seanb5724 2 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    This was truly a good video. I feel like I actually learned something more on this.

  • @michaelpfister1283
    @michaelpfister1283 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great setting! :-) And awesome content. Thank you for the great videos!

  • @Mabeylater293
    @Mabeylater293 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Art of saying a lot without saying anything.

  • @owlfethurz8377
    @owlfethurz8377 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The information at the beginning about the connection between the song by J. Neander, his name, the Neander Valley, and the Neanderthals was really fascinating.
    Also, anyone looking for some reliable information regarding becoming a Christion but can't find a church in your area: Voddie Baucham, Steven J Lawson, Keving De Young, John Piper...there are many others. Just my opinion, take it or leave it. Blessings!

  • @tedc4982
    @tedc4982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days-and afterward as well-when the sons of God had relations with the daughters of men. And they bore them children who became the mighty men of old, men of renown." - Gen 6:4

    • @amber_Forever16
      @amber_Forever16 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Sons of God had relations with the daughters of man.... so the sons of God aren't men then because that sentence wouldn't make sense if so... so is sons of God angels or what??? This is confusing

    • @amber_Forever16
      @amber_Forever16 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Who are nephilim

    • @MrKlarc19
      @MrKlarc19 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Nephilim were children of fallen angels and human women.

    • @tedc4982
      @tedc4982 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@amber_Forever16 Read Genesis 6:14 as cited above... and if you're interested in more, read 'The Book of Enoch (or 1 Enoch),' even just the first 10 chapters or so. You can read it online or download it free.
      Some were giants, most were "The mighty men of old." - Gen 6 They are the only other Biblical species (or race) of man or half-man, half-angel - all abomination.
      They are your Neanderthal.

    • @EaNasir-r1d
      @EaNasir-r1d 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Yes but we also carry neanderthal and denisovan and even other hominin dna in us.

  • @jasminweeks9471
    @jasminweeks9471 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Good presentation

  • @SojournerDidimus
    @SojournerDidimus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When I read the description of Esau in the Bible, it strikes me that his appearance is very much alike to what we now call flintstone/caveman/neanderthal. He is a muscular, hairy hunter with limited self control and primitive speech (or so I've been told his words are in the Hebrew). As the descendants of Esau, the Edomites, have been mostly wiped away as recorded in the Bible, it strikes me as plausible that what we know about Esau and his descendants might very well have significant overlap with these "primitive human races" we find remains of.
    I'd love to hear your insight on this matter.

    • @verenatuna9010
      @verenatuna9010 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even though Esau was a cave dweller (Petra) - why should Esau's appearance be so much more primitive as his brother's, Jacob?
      The lineage of the Neanderthals are too old -
      both, Israelites and Edomites, are pretty "young" nations.
      Also, the alleged paternal haplogroups (y-dna) of the Neanderthals do not fit Semitic paternal lines...

    • @margomoore4527
      @margomoore4527 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@verenatuna9010, semitic lines would have originated with Abraham, much later. Cain split off much earlier. But the wives of Noah’s sons were Descendents of Methuselah-if I recall correctly-and they may have brought in some very early DNA. Probably where that tiny bit of Neanderthal in modern people came from.

  • @drchristopherjsernaque
    @drchristopherjsernaque 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I love the setting!!! 🎉🎉🎉
    Another great video!!!

  • @amber_Forever16
    @amber_Forever16 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for answering my question!

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Neanderthals were Eurasians descended from Japheth and Denisovans are a mix of Eurasians and Canaanites and or Cushites descended from Ham.
    Native Americans crossed the Atlantic to Central America from the Mediterranean Sea. There are four or five haplogroup lineages that show this migration route, A C&D maternal lineages and the Q paternal lineage as well as probably the C paternal lineages make this same crossing.
    People are ignoring actual known human history. The actual historical records and DNA migrations show that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. We should learn ancient history before trying to learn science.
    1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal
    2. Thracians (L) Tiras
    3. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan
    4. Siberians & East Asians (NO) Magog
    5. Eastern Europeans & East Eurasians (P) Meshek
    6. Medes (Q) Madai
    7. Western Europeans (R) Gomer
    8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad
    9. Elamites (H) Elam
    10. Assyrians (G) Asshur
    11. Arameans (F1) Aram
    12. Lydians (F2) Lud
    13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush
    14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim
    15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan
    16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut
    The D paternal haplogroup Sino descendants of Canaan migrated from Canaan east to China all the way to Japan and Tibet. The C paternal haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated as far as South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas accounting for the Olmec civilization as well as the Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes that crossed the Atlantic to Central America.
    The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the Semitic N lineage accompanied the Eurasian Q paternal haplogroup to Central America. The C&D maternal haplogroups belonging to the Eurasian M lineage also accompanied the Atlantic crossing of the Q paternal haplogroup Medes and probably the C paternal haplogroup to Central America. The Semitic B maternal mtDNA haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean to South America.
    The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent another Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is most likely Dan and I2 resembles the movements of the tribe of Asher)
    Of course there is also the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 as well which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the largest group of descendants probably of the House of the kings David and Solomon. Now you know a lot more of what is verified human history.

    • @brunobastos5533
      @brunobastos5533 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Last neandertal died 28000 year ago how that fit the bible, genetics show native Americans crossed the Bering see to Alaska , never a Atlantic cross was found

    • @JungleJargon
      @JungleJargon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@brunobastos5533 Your dating method doesn’t rely on historical records or calendars. I can show you the four separate lineages that cross the Atlantic together and spread out from Central America.

    • @timhallas4275
      @timhallas4275 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Except Noah, Ham, Shem and Japeth are fictional characters in a very stupid story.

    • @JungleJargon
      @JungleJargon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@timhallas4275 We are all descended from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Why is it so important for you to deny human history.

    • @anthonycrumb5753
      @anthonycrumb5753 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You get an E for effort, this basing human distribution around the planet ater a flood that never even happened based on biblical mythology is total nonsense, you are in my opinion totally wasting your time trying to make verifiable facts fit into a complete world of mythological fantasy,
      go pick up a proper science book or watch something relevent on You Tube instead of trying to confirm some deluded biblicaly minded troglodyte's beliefs.

  • @debjordan4399
    @debjordan4399 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ❤❤❤ Great talk.

  • @mythbhavd
    @mythbhavd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    “Newman!” ~ Seinfeld

  • @aaronowen4425
    @aaronowen4425 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    very interesting video thanks for posting!

  • @ReeseRozum-sm1zs
    @ReeseRozum-sm1zs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Do you mean the Flintstones wasn't scientifically accurate?

  • @ChuckBrowntheClown
    @ChuckBrowntheClown 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree; boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in. Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: for if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off. And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again. For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree? For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, And shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: For this is my covenant unto them, When I shall take away their sins.”
    ‭‭Romans‬ ‭11‬:‭17‬-‭27‬ ‭KJV‬‬
    “And I will feed the flock of slaughter, even you, O poor of the flock. And I took unto me two staves; the one I called Beauty, and the other I called Bands; and I fed the flock. And I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people. And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear. So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver. And the LORD said unto me, Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them. And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of the LORD. Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands, that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.”
    ‭‭Zechariah‬ ‭11‬:‭7‬, ‭10‬, ‭12‬-‭14‬ ‭KJV‬‬
    “then take silver and gold, and make crowns, and set them upon the head of Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest; and speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the LORD: even he shall build the temple of the LORD; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both.”
    ‭‭Zechariah‬ ‭6‬:‭11‬-‭13‬ ‭KJV‬‬
    “and two olive trees by it, one upon the right side of the bowl, and the other upon the left side thereof. Then answered I, and said unto him, What are these two olive trees upon the right side of the candlestick and upon the left side thereof? And I answered again, and said unto him, What be these two olive branches which through the two golden pipes empty the golden oil out of themselves? And he answered me and said, Knowest thou not what these be? And I said, No, my Lord. Then said he, These are the two anointed ones, that stand by the Lord of the whole earth.”
    ‭‭Zechariah‬ ‭4‬:‭3‬, ‭11‬-‭14‬ ‭KJV‬‬
    “In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.”
    ‭‭Revelation‬ ‭22‬:‭2‬ ‭KJV‬‬
    God’s Word along with science is awesome. Domino! 10:48
    Glory and praise to God in the name of Jesus Christ!

  • @VonAggelby
    @VonAggelby 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Isaiah 26:3
    And it came to pass in the days of old, that there dwelt upon the earth a people known as the Ancients. They were mighty in stature and skilled in the ways of the land. The Ancients walked with wisdom and strength, and their deeds were remembered by the generations that followed.

    • @tedc4982
      @tedc4982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's something more than curious...Isa 26:3 KJV reads: "Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because he trusteth in thee." What's up with that?

    • @debbiedotodue
      @debbiedotodue 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tedc4982it must be a mistake on the character and verse or book

    • @jasonhallock3773
      @jasonhallock3773 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There was Adam then giants then Noah and then a few thousands years ago there was Moses. The time between each ???????? Lots of

  • @CombatWombatQRF
    @CombatWombatQRF 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I want to have a drink with this guy

  • @2whitaker
    @2whitaker 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Please read "Buried Alive" by Jack Cuozzo for more research on Neanderthals.

  • @DavidRose-m8s
    @DavidRose-m8s 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Meandering - walking aimless, and aimless walking river. Any meandering lower river valley shows eons of alluvial deposits from natural erosion of mountains. We are dust in the winds of time. Only those who deny time from fear of death can come up with creation as a recent single starting point. It is said acceptance is one of the pillars of healing, and not to go charging at windmills.

    • @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193
      @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you honestly believe that

    • @truthisbeautiful7492
      @truthisbeautiful7492 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We don't deny time. We reject the philosophical idea of deep time thought up by French philosophers around the 18th century.

    • @truthisbeautiful7492
      @truthisbeautiful7492 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And how fast do those mountains erode?

    • @truthisbeautiful7492
      @truthisbeautiful7492 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And creation week, the global flood and the ice age can do a lot of work. You don't need millions of years

    • @truthisbeautiful7492
      @truthisbeautiful7492 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Plus Christians have nothing to fear from death since Jesus defeated it. It's the anti Christians that fear death and they should because there will be a judgment day.

  • @mybuckhead
    @mybuckhead 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The other people will kill me" I do not think these were from Adam and Eve. I have one verse that sort of supports this.

  • @eldansambatyon
    @eldansambatyon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    remember those people that reached 500+ years old..... calcium deposits

  • @David-mo2rg
    @David-mo2rg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We're Neanderthal spiritual. Before becoming a Christian I had a bad past .just because there is no evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen ❤

  • @onecowstampede9140
    @onecowstampede9140 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Who among geneticists is digging into gen6/ nephilim descendants? - despite being destroyed in the food "and also after that" is at least the "that" not so much the "how" of the origins of goliath et al, og, anakim, rephaim etc

    • @SepticSharKk
      @SepticSharKk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is disagreement as to what the “nephilim” refers to. In my opinion it does not refer to literal giants, rather men of reknown who built the first empires of the ancient world. The “giants” among men.
      The sons of Adam having children with the sons of men or whatever = godly men intermarrying with the godless of the time, turning their descendants from god and becoming obsessed with themselves and with power and dominating other men and groups of men, building huge cities and empires with their own names on them…as opposed to the explanation that men were having kids with angels and those children being literal giants with super human strength and abilities (which is a fantastical story and which makes 0 sense since angels don’t marry and very likely do not have any power to create life/kids-they were not created in the image of God, a creator!)
      I do believe that Goliath and his family simply had genetic defects and were not really healthy folk. They were not “nephilim”.

    • @theoutspokenhumanist
      @theoutspokenhumanist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No-one. Because geneticists do not waste time on mythology and fairy stories. Even if you believe these things to be true, how do you imagine we could possibly study them?

    • @anthonycrumb5753
      @anthonycrumb5753 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No self respecting geneticist would waste 5 minutes of their time with this nonsense unless they went over to the 'dark side of force' and worked for AIG or ICR, then they would simply be lying for Jesus like all the rest of the professional Creationistist and Appologists.

    • @onecowstampede9140
      @onecowstampede9140 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theoutspokenhumanist there's good reason to look at both x and y chromosomal markers depending on how you parse the text.

    • @theoutspokenhumanist
      @theoutspokenhumanist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@onecowstampede9140 How you parse what text?
      Before you could convince any reputable, serious scientist to even attempt to study such things, you would have to begin by demonstrating the bible to be genuine history instead of myth.
      As we actually know, today, what is above the clouds and we know it is not a crystal dome with windows to let in, as rain, the waters surrounding a flat earth and we know the sun and moon and are not fixed in that dome and stars cannot fall on the earth or be used as missiles against demons and we know donkeys and serpents can't talk because they do not have the necessary vocal chords, and we know the flood did not happen and the tower of babel was physically impossible and .... well, you get the idea.

  • @kingoftheearth2149
    @kingoftheearth2149 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The answer to neanderthals in the Bible..... The original human prior to the interspecies relations between angels and neanderthals resulting in the human race as the grandsons of Noah a half breed himself

  • @debbiedotodue
    @debbiedotodue 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @bigred8438
    @bigred8438 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Creationists might simply tell us that Neanderthals did evolve from preexisting forms, while homo sapiens sapiens were created ha ha ha.

    • @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193
      @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You could always contend with the actual arguments, instead of the straw men you create.

    • @bojackhorseman3787
      @bojackhorseman3787 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@johnnybagofdoughnuts4193 He's just making incorrect statements. A debate is grounded in truth, debating this man couldn't be considered a debate because he's not actually saying anything. He's just making incorrect statements. He's gathering pieces of info and studies out of context to build a hollow mountain of "support" for his preconceived idea, whereas scientists gather information, develop studies, and create a theory/hypothesis based on that gathered information.

    • @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193
      @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ incorrect statements according to who? And the scientists you trust don’t start with assumptions? No one will pass your purity test, if you were to keep the standard even across the board.

    • @bojackhorseman3787
      @bojackhorseman3787 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193 assumptions based on empirical and tested evidence that continue to prove themselves correct over each interaction of newly supported theories and hypothesis is much different than grasping at pseudoscientific conclusions based on 2000 year old fables.

    • @dannyhester3342
      @dannyhester3342 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnnybagofdoughnuts4193Santa Claus

  • @Revolver1701
    @Revolver1701 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Long Branch attraction was what Matt Dillon had for Miss Kitty.

  • @jimmychamness3837
    @jimmychamness3837 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Bible speaks of making of man different.
    There two accounts not one how everyone reads.
    If everyone is family no mark would be necessary for uncle Cain.
    We all know what he did.

  • @betsybarnicle8016
    @betsybarnicle8016 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    5:36 😅

  • @sanidan2010
    @sanidan2010 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh man! I thought Laurel Caverns in PA were deep!

  • @MyHandsAreMadeofGlass
    @MyHandsAreMadeofGlass 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Neanderthal is probably the Canaanite.

  • @johnsmith-iv6sc
    @johnsmith-iv6sc หลายเดือนก่อน

    I guess you suppose earth is only six thousand years old? 🤦
    Which is solely based on the genealogy of the bible. Pretty shaky ground. Seems like a table with only one leg.

  • @DLee1100s
    @DLee1100s 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "We now know we were wrong yesterday". In reality we are almost certainly wrong about almost everything today as well.

    • @chrisbrooks4032
      @chrisbrooks4032 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re definitely wrong about the ignorant fucking bible

  • @Blutgang
    @Blutgang 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I supposef to have 6% shared DNA with them.

  • @bojackhorseman3787
    @bojackhorseman3787 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I mean, this is just false. This is blatantly false.

  • @BrandonTmusic
    @BrandonTmusic หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could you do a video on all the other "homo" species like homo habilus or africanus or any of those "pre homo sapian" supposed ancestors? How do all these "different" species fit into our history if Christianty is true?

  • @cristinamartinez1235
    @cristinamartinez1235 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much for your videos, Dr. Carter. Please do an episode about Dr. Jack Cuozzo's approach to the Neanderthals. What is your opinion on his book Buried Alive?

  • @billybobwombat2231
    @billybobwombat2231 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The mental gymnastics that is required to validate the religion is mind numbing

    • @tedc4982
      @tedc4982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days-and afterward as well-when the sons of God had relations with the daughters of men. And they bore them children who became the mighty men of old, men of renown." - Gen 6:4

    • @bigga5406
      @bigga5406 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂😂 I see enough crazy things in today’s day we live in, to absolutely 100% believe in the Bible. Jesus is Lord. God Bless you and yours.

    • @jasonhallock3773
      @jasonhallock3773 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It appears to take a few backflips to disprove it

    • @billybobwombat2231
      @billybobwombat2231 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jasonhallock3773 you don't need to disprove if don't believe, it's quite simple really 🤷

    • @UUu-xl3gk
      @UUu-xl3gk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are a poor irrati0nal being ​@@billybobwombat2231

  • @talltimberswoodshop7552
    @talltimberswoodshop7552 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you, Rob. Heb 11:38 "(men of whom the world was not worthy", wandering in deserts and mountains and caves and holes in the ground." We'll see them in heaven because they were faithful to the end.

    • @SepticSharKk
      @SepticSharKk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hebrews 11 verse 38 isn’t likely to be about cavemen/neanderthals if you look at the context of that passage. That whole passage flows chronologically through major timepoints of Jewish history up until Paul writing that.

  • @OceanusHelios
    @OceanusHelios 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Nonsense. Anything to protect this Bronze Age myth, eh?

    • @Tybold63
      @Tybold63 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      haha yeah and most myths in the Bible are not even made by "jews" but based on older myths like Sumerians and other older civilisations in that part of the world and probably even shared with parts of India.

    • @Chociewitka
      @Chociewitka 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ? why arbitrary Bronze Age, there are many reports within which clearly go back to the Mezolithic at least = e.g. beginning of Mankind/civilisation

  • @standingbear998
    @standingbear998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    everywhere that is where, they were just people and fit where people fit. creating nonsense and arguements

  • @vape79
    @vape79 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Explain yourself!!!!

  • @franklyn427
    @franklyn427 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Right around the 9 minute mark, you made a comment regarding having rapid changes when there is inbreeding. Could you elaborate? This explains why we can have the number of species we have since the flood. Correct?

    • @theoutspokenhumanist
      @theoutspokenhumanist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please excuse me for jumping in but, no. Not correct. And not possible. The creation of thousands of new species since the flood calls not only for evolution but for it to happen at an insane and impossible pace. And a pace so crazy we would actually see it still happening all around us.
      If you care about the truth and real science, you might contact other scientists not employed by creationist organisations, or read their books or watch their videos, and obtain a cross section of the scientific consensus. You will find that almost no-one agrees with Dr Carter and the vast majority of biologists all around the world think he is deluded at best and a liar at worst.
      People who place their preferred religious beliefs above truth and facts, never learn anything they do not already agree with. That is choosing to remain ignorant.
      Rejecting creationism does not mean rejecting Christ. The rest of world Christianity has already done it.

  • @roshaningole7489
    @roshaningole7489 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Half of the video is waste of time.unnnecessary jiberish.keep your videos short simple and informatic and as some pictures in between.your views will grow

    • @brunobastos5533
      @brunobastos5533 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      they need it to confuse even more

    • @JimNelson-po9zn
      @JimNelson-po9zn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Neanderthal got whipped out.

  • @doctormuu203
    @doctormuu203 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I wish sincerely Dr. C was my teacher of genetics in undergraduate university. I wonder - is it possible Adam and Ever were Neandertals and current mankind is mutation?

    • @Tybold63
      @Tybold63 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lol yeah one lie or speculations often make another lie and speculations and voila you could end up with something like the Bible ;-)

    • @theoutspokenhumanist
      @theoutspokenhumanist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No. it's not possible.

    • @anthonycrumb5753
      @anthonycrumb5753 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You want the long and the short answer - NO !

    • @ericafoster4368
      @ericafoster4368 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No because Adam and Eve and the rest of the biblical mythology weren't real only stories!!

    • @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193
      @johnnybagofdoughnuts4193 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ericafoster4368they’re more real than you are

  • @lh7550
    @lh7550 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Sweet is the Ignorance of the Fools"
    I'm an average educated person who has been a Fundamentalist Christian for over 50 years. I always had existential questions in my mind for which I also always thought the experts would have the right answers... they Didn't.... that realization prompted me to investigate deeply on my own. As a result, today I consider myself an Agnostic. I think that Evolution shows a Relationship in the Timeline of Species but proves Not their Origin, or the Origen of Life itself. On the other hand, I have come to believe that Religions are the Product of Human Arrogance, Existential Fear, and Ignorance. That at their core, they Tap into that Nostalgic Paternalism that makes us want to Believe Protected, Secured, and Justified in Life. We will probably Never Know the Origins of Life and other Basic Secrets of the Universe.... But our Arrogance and Ignorance make us to believe that we do... that we are Deserving, that we will Transcend... For that purpose we Lie all the Lies we need to Fool ourselves and Silence our Brains...

    • @appaloosa42
      @appaloosa42 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So…silence your brain and let your spirit believe!
      Yes, religions ate just human ‘clubs’ of like-minded people. Faith is an individual relationship with Creator!

    • @timhallas4275
      @timhallas4275 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At one time in Earth's history, the only living things were algae. Ask yourself where fish came from, where frogs came from, where reptiles came from, where mammals came from..... etc.
      There are two possible answers, and only one is right. Evolution, or magic spells cast by an imaginary sorcerer.

    • @richiejourney1840
      @richiejourney1840 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@timhallas4275😂you mean like the spells of “Mother Nature”? I’ll pick the living intelligence one…

    • @Micah-6.8
      @Micah-6.8 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m guessing you have no clue who the Jesuits are and how they have worked to discredit Jesus Christ and Christianity throughout history? You should research that!

  • @drchristopherjsernaque
    @drchristopherjsernaque 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    "Robert Carter disproved evolution in a cave!!!"-Obadiah Stane probably

    • @hippopilot6750
      @hippopilot6750 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @anthonypolonkay2681
      @anthonypolonkay2681 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Best comment

    • @drchristopherjsernaque
      @drchristopherjsernaque 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hippopilot6750 The comment from Obadiah came to me as I typed my first one! 😂

    • @drchristopherjsernaque
      @drchristopherjsernaque 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@anthonypolonkay2681 Much appreciated! Dr. C is awesome!

    • @chrisbrooks4032
      @chrisbrooks4032 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is beyond stupidity. Evolution is a natural fact

  • @hglundahl
    @hglundahl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:22 Up to 230 years.
    I obviously totally agree on POG idea being HOG-wash.
    6:45 I think I'll even dispute the idea there were no caves prior to the Flood.
    But supposing it were correct, the places we find them in are caves now, how if they were some kind of buildings that have since been covered inside and out with flowstone and Flood layers of the type "formerly shellfish"?
    7:07 _"Fossils that was laid down during the Flood"_
    When exactly has a clear Flood fossil been found in the same rock and cave as a Neanderthal?
    I made a list of Lagerstätten for dino fossils and compared with a list of Neanderthal finds. If we suppose both to be pre-Flood, no collision occurred. The dinos can have been inserted as a kind of Berlin walls with dangerous beasts doing what automated machine guns did on the wall. One way of seeing Genesis 6:11 (or at least the aftermath of the Mahabharata war).
    7:33 What if those islands were not islands in the pre-Flood world?
    10:34 If both Denisovans and Neanderthals were pre-Flood, both could be (in various degrees) related to Nephelim. A supernatural event factoring in on mutations.
    By the way, I disagree that Denisovans are only known from tiny body parts. Let me explain. In Atapuerca, there is a population that has at least at times been classed as "Homo Antecessor" ... it has a morphology very similar to Heidelbergians, and a genome (as per Svante Pääbo's tests) very similar to Denisovan.
    I conclude that Heidelbergians had a genome very similar to Denisovan too and the pinky finger in the Denisova cave had a morphology very similar to Antecessor and to Heidelbergians. The three clades are just one. Obviously a population within humanity.
    The fact that Antecessor in Atapuerca has been identified as committing (or at least being victim of) cannibalism chimes in very well with those people being in the times of Genesis 6:11.
    For Neanderthals you have mentioned meals like clams, probably licit in the pre-Flood world, in El Sidrón you have found pine nuts on the dental calculus, licit in the pre-Flood world. In Belgium you had Neanderthals living on a diet of woolly rhino and fellow men, illicit in the pre-Flood, and as to the latter, also the post-Flood world.
    11:37 Y-chromosomes of Neanderthals are lacking in men now alive. Mitochondria of them are lacking in man now alive. C. 1/3 of the autosomal DNA is still around as alleles. That's explainable if a daughter in law of Noah was halfbreed, with her father being Neanderthal.
    The article "Are Neanderthals Pre-Flood" is a Feedback article from 2.II.2019. The exact same day, on my Creation vs. Evolution blog, I answered in the article: "Answering Robert Carter's Four Reasons" and one week later a dialogue is published on my FB Writings blog "Carter's Notification on His Post".
    15:06 I would say that the Neanderthals eating pine nuts or clams (no nephesh khayah creatures, arguably) remembered Eden, and the Neanderthals eating woolly rhino and men, well, they acted very Genesis 6:11.
    15:48 There are ways to air caves (though arguably not the kind your are sitting in). We do not need to assume the Neanderthals or anyone else regularly _lived in_ caves, as opposed to using them as burial places.
    Except obviously places where caves are a bit different, like in Cappadocia, or in parts of Jordan.
    16:00 Near Nizza, some people had a way around that problem. Build a little house _inside_ the cave. My blog post "Survival Tip, if you can find a cave by the seashore" is on the blog "Recipes from Home and Abroad"
    16:43 Good Christian teachers found, galore: Pope St. Pius X (wrote encyclicals and a Catechism), Pope Michael II (Vatican in Exile). Lots between them.
    16:56 Creation dot com is an excellent resource for Creation science, with caveats (like your placing Neanderthals post-Flood), but less so on Christian living. Obviously not quite as bad as "Father" James Martin, but even so. Or, _on this topic,_ even Jimmy Akin is really bad, like Swamidass bad.

  • @TheinternetArchaeologist
    @TheinternetArchaeologist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1:28 You sound like Doctor Etymological fallacy

    • @dadsonworldwide3238
      @dadsonworldwide3238 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1900s structuralism making academics participatory without offending the world is one long English etymological corruption attack .

    • @dadsonworldwide3238
      @dadsonworldwide3238 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      After the anglo American ultimate precision ✝️xyzt alignment in English dug up the past to right wrongs where Greek unicorn 🦄 west gets out of context learn how rhe eastern attributes mythology lost in translation it all happened down stream of assyrian babylonian evolutionary cosmogony mythology that darwin and the once upon a time mind dope perception management + etymological corruption caused it to begin with.
      It's why modern physics math mapping blueprinting in all feilds formulism is the best approach & practice while letting all the theologians like darwin of phylosphers argue the order of scientific boxes on what happened before another.

  • @Jaggerbush
    @Jaggerbush 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why didnt god do a better job with this book? The all knowing god of everthing cant even get a story together that made sense.

    • @jakoboka
      @jakoboka 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you would see Him, if you would hold your fingers in the holes where they nailed him on the cross, you would still not believe Him. Your eyes and ears are shut. Turn to Him and learn that it's not about geneology, chronology, history but about the faith of humanity. God has a way with you, knock on the door and he will surely open the door.

    • @Tim.Foster123
      @Tim.Foster123 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're assuming He wanted you to have all this information in a way that caters to your sensibilities. What fun would that be?
      Prov 25:2

  • @BibleTales123
    @BibleTales123 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We believe in God 🧸✝️💖 not building our house on Satan's sand

  • @PearlmanYeC
    @PearlmanYeC 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    listening now.
    interesting.
    In Pearlman YeC we have the known Neanderthal as living Post 1656 anno-mundi global flood, so descended from Noach's family. By 1996 was the start of the dispersion from Bavel.
    which i think you will spell out soon.

    • @PearlmanYeC
      @PearlmanYeC 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Denisovan remains may be Mabul year wash up. Close relatives of one or more of the 4 wives of Noach and 3 sons. As if pre-flood they are from Chava and First Adam. If Post flood from Noach and family that survived the global flood on the ark.

  • @jacobjimenez9902
    @jacobjimenez9902 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Get to the point. Gezzzzz

  • @WarAndFame
    @WarAndFame 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    neanderthals didnt have large groups or villages like sapiens. almost solitary compared to sapiens like they were tigers vs us lions. (there's a point to this i promise). Because lions are social creatures they have a competitive growth gene for cubs to compete against the cubs of other males. tigers do not. Because of the fact that lions have this, lionesses evolved growth limiters for their cubs, blocking this competition and giving the females cubs greater likelihood of surviving. It's reasonable to think the same could be true for sapiens vs neanderthals with sapiens having childhood competition spurring competitive growth and females limiting this to have more offspring overall. and neanderthals in turn NOT having this limiter. so when sapiens bread with neanderthals these suppressed genes could be unlocked. Even without this though, neanderthals had a greater hormonal constitution than sapiens, so when we mixed there was probably a size boost regardless-taller sapiens with greater hormonal constitution.. This also explains why the sapiens y chromosome wiped out and tore through the neanderthal Y. as soon as it weaseled its way into the neanderthal population it kept making big ol autistic boys. literally.

  • @messiahmatrix
    @messiahmatrix 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Creationist such as myself can “deal” with Neanderthals that passed away 35,000 years ago, and Tyrannosaurs and such who died 66 millions ago, by focusing on the Gospel of Jesus Christ, who was crucified at the cross and rose from the dead from our justification. The Gospels isn’t about the age of the earth it’s about Jesus being God and the Savior.

    • @roberttwyman432
      @roberttwyman432 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The gospel is also about the reliability of the Old Testament which helps to prove that Jesus was the Christ and that scripture can be trusted, But don't be unsettled by that. When you examine the Old-earth arguments you will see that they don't stand up.

  • @leroybrown9143
    @leroybrown9143 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everything here invokes natural selection acting on mutations. This is a huge problem for creationism and a big win for darwinism.

  • @quetzelmichaels1637
    @quetzelmichaels1637 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Adam's 'job' is to save YHWH from himself. YHWH is an old softie. Adam wields the fiery sword, judges (sacrifice) the earth, and becomes a worm. YHWH judged the gods of the Milkyway and became the snake.
    Adam is a third-party to this world and these heavens. The Garden of Eden is in Adam's realm, which is vast and forever peaceful. It is the kingdom prepared at the foundation of the world. The Ancient Serpent of Old is revealed, transfigured and, as the Ancient One of Days, takes his seat on the Mount of Assembly in his Garden of Eden. In a galaxy far, far, away, so to speak.
    Adam had a forest of trees to lean from while he tilled the soil and prepared the promised land, a heavenly home, the new heaven and new earth. Lilith, Adam's wife, then settled Adam, Eve, and the snake, east of Eden until the day Adam wields the fiery sword.

  • @walterhelm8186
    @walterhelm8186 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I fully expect to meet Neanderthals in heaven.

  • @StudentDad-mc3pu
    @StudentDad-mc3pu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Creationists can't explain ANYTHING.

    • @brettbarager9101
      @brettbarager9101 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure they can but you just don't validate their perspective. In all fairness, many Creationists are guilty of the same thing!

  • @danielduvana
    @danielduvana 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No, the answer is no. All attempts at disproving evolution have failed spectacularly. The evidence in favor of evolution as the mechanism for speciation is stupendously large

    • @CMO999
      @CMO999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I used to think that. I'm not so sure any more.

    • @Farsiminister
      @Farsiminister 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      There is one problem that evolution has yet to solve: mutations in the genes of DNA that produce functioning proteins.
      The problem with mutations is that it takes very few changes in gene sequences to result in nonfunctional genes.
      DNA is like a software code on a computer. If you make mistakes in computer codes, it can produce the disaster that Microsoft faced a few weeks ago. Cystic Fibrosis is an example of a mutation gone bad.
      To produce functioning genes, the odds are astronomical. There isn't enough time in the universe to create all the necessary genes for life.
      No computer programmer, no computer code; no Creator, no life.

    • @jeffmorin5867
      @jeffmorin5867 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Failed? Maybe if you've been holding your ears screaming "lalalalalalalalalalalala"

    • @Micah-6.8
      @Micah-6.8 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s all theories, lies and antichrist propaganda. Research some stuff that the other side has done and don’t just drink Satans Kool-Aid.

    • @joelebert9767
      @joelebert9767 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're new here aren't you?

  • @lighthousenetwork.tv-media
    @lighthousenetwork.tv-media 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    they probably predated the flood!

    • @roberttwyman432
      @roberttwyman432 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That wouldn't seem possible if they lived in limestone caves since limestone is sedimentary rock made of fossils burried in the flood.