Pushover Analysis Using SAP2000

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.พ. 2019
  • 🌟 Full Courses Available! Enhance your skills today! 🌟
    📘 STAAD Pro: The Ultimate Beginner's Guide
    Unlock the secrets of STAAD Pro with our comprehensive beginner's guide. Perfect for those starting their journey in structural analysis!
    bit.ly/2ZHmhFw
    🏢 ETABS Mastery: Structural Design Simplified
    Master ETABS with this course designed to make structural design easy and accessible. Gain the skills you need to succeed.
    bit.ly/2FG4NT0
    🔨 Basics of Civil Engineering in Construction
    Dive into the fundamentals of civil engineering with a focus on construction. Ideal for beginners and those looking to refresh their knowledge.
    bit.ly/2xmePUM
    🛠️ Mastering SAP2000: From Beginner To Pro
    Transform from a novice to a pro in SAP2000. This course covers everything you need to know to become an expert in structural analysis.
    bit.ly/2D9V1aq
    📚 Fundamentals of Structural Analysis: Statics
    Strengthen your understanding of statics in structural analysis. A must-have course for anyone serious about structural engineering.
    bit.ly/39F414Y
    📐 Learn To Read Structural Drawings: With Real Site Videos
    Learn how to read structural drawings with real site videos for practical understanding. Perfect for both students and professionals.
    bit.ly/2Xw0dkv
    If you like my work, buy me a coffee! ☕️😊
    [Support Me] paypal.me/GeetaSaud?country.x...

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @engineeringacademy9812
    @engineeringacademy9812  4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Get Two months FREE at SkillShare:
    skl.sh/2XYlXoU

  • @atikolbasz6
    @atikolbasz6 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Extremely useful tutorial! Thank you!

  • @engineeringacademy9812
    @engineeringacademy9812  4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now you can join our Facebook group. Click on the link below ot join:
    facebook.com/groups/2574131862914436/

  • @sharikar4625
    @sharikar4625 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the video was really informative

  • @homeoffootballbettingtips
    @homeoffootballbettingtips 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    nice video sir.please can you do a video about time history analysis and flat slab design?

  • @prasanthsekar6059
    @prasanthsekar6059 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is the difference between the use of Ux (acceleration) for pushover case instead of load pattern (Qx), which will be based on the response spectrum (Response spectrum)??

  • @motazfdlalmulagsmallaahmed1281
    @motazfdlalmulagsmallaahmed1281 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanx so much for useful video. The analysis for pushover case its not comletetede it just was %34 in your video and i have the same poblem when i do pushover analysis. are you have any advaice to solve this problem?

  • @prastioprojects
    @prastioprojects 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @homeoffootballbettingtips
    @homeoffootballbettingtips 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    please sir can you explain in details the push over curve

  • @kaviyabs5110
    @kaviyabs5110 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u soo much sir 😀

  • @amrmasoud5580
    @amrmasoud5580 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please tell me, how to do multi- mode push over by sap 2000? thanks

  • @amrmasoud5580
    @amrmasoud5580 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good

  • @atikolbasz6
    @atikolbasz6 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can I identify a certain hinge from the model?
    I want to display simply the label of the hinge, so I can identify the hinge in the table.

  • @raymondhaeryono8426
    @raymondhaeryono8426 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we perform pushover analysis for underground structure by SAP2000? So the push load is added by horizontal soil pressure, ground water pressure etc. but no increment on these force? Thanks

  • @ranjankarki3689
    @ranjankarki3689 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best classs ever on you tube

  • @gayarsandeep201
    @gayarsandeep201 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q1.Sir why did you place one hinge only at the ground story column at top ?

  • @TheRegish
    @TheRegish 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir how to calculate SF for response spectra for FEMA 440 EL

  • @ogisuryadinata3500
    @ogisuryadinata3500 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It' that right put 5mm not 50 mm?
    Sorry i miss understood on that

  • @hossamsaber860
    @hossamsaber860 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    first, thank you for this video & can you give us the references from where you get this

  • @heldermaranhao4006
    @heldermaranhao4006 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Sir. First of all thank you for your video. Can I ask why do you not consider the hinges at the base of the columns? Thank you

    • @engineeringacademy9812
      @engineeringacademy9812  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Normally we assume that there is no hinge formation at the base column. You can make hinges there as well.

  • @drashwinilk778
    @drashwinilk778 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, Why hinges are formed only at joints ?? How do I know hinges are formed in beams or columns??

  • @zinzintun8458
    @zinzintun8458 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why your pushover curve did not show up to the yielding?

  • @praveenanand852
    @praveenanand852 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what about the performance point?

  • @deepdobaria3233
    @deepdobaria3233 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    While defining hinges you have chosen ASCE in auto hing type how can I get FEMA in auto hinge type ?

    • @kaushik1936
      @kaushik1936 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same problem I'm facing, brother

  • @johnronel7980
    @johnronel7980 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am confused with interpreting the result of Push Over analysis. Sorry for the basic question, please bear with me.
    Once you generated all the possible plastic hinging, in terms of engineering, what would happen next? I mean how will I interpret this result to be used in the final design/ assessment?
    Also, I am finding it difficult to wrap my head around the column developing plastic hinge. Isn't that what seismic code is trying to prevent in stating the strong column weak beam requirements?
    Would love to hear your thoughts. Btw, thank you for the great video.

    • @johnronel7980
      @johnronel7980 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the response. I appreciate it. My question is how will the result of the Push Over Analysis be used in design (PBD) or in the assessment of existing buildings?
      Also, can you please clarify, "hinge formation is the indication of member failure"?
      My understanding is that when plastic hinging occurs there is an increase of rotation/displacement without an increase in force. Not necessarily failure because there is a potential stress redistribution. Failure will occur once a hinged member no longer has the means to redistribute the force since other members have exhausted its plastic capacity. I would appreciate clarification on this.

    • @johnronel7980
      @johnronel7980 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@engineeringacademy9812 Thank you! Looking forward to it.
      You're doing the young engineering community a great favour. Keep it up!

  • @shekharshrestha3892
    @shekharshrestha3892 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the warnings that came for P-MM interaction surface isnot convex? What does that mean?

    • @hemilcivil3909
      @hemilcivil3909 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think change size of columns..

  • @ioannischristou7319
    @ioannischristou7319 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:08 why U3 is selected ?

  • @praveenanand852
    @praveenanand852 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello... just one question.. After the pushover analysis, can we count the number of plastic hinges formed?

  • @hemilcivil3909
    @hemilcivil3909 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir while I m doing nlsa on 3 storey 3 d building(20m x10m) it takes too much time....and lots of null steps generated...so how to resolve it?? please reply... I have corei5 9 th Gen, 240 gb Sdd hdd, 16 gb ddr 4 ram.. system.

    • @engineeringacademy9812
      @engineeringacademy9812  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There might be problem in modelling. Please check your model.

    • @hemilcivil3909
      @hemilcivil3909 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sir model checked...it is ok...
      What would be other issues for lots of null steps generated???

  • @sakibayub6087
    @sakibayub6087 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi

  • @heartsoul4387
    @heartsoul4387 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir i have problem in push over analysis plz reply me its urgent i have persentation tomorrow

    • @engineeringacademy9812
      @engineeringacademy9812  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is the problem?

    • @nitinsharma228
      @nitinsharma228 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sir do we check result on the basis of intensity like zone 1 zone2 for earthquake after analysis of pushover ??
      In results

  • @apkflix1278
    @apkflix1278 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wrong

  • @georgentounis7774
    @georgentounis7774 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wrong approach on the gravity. what's the use defining U3 monitored displacement when you apply a full load? also you don't need multiple states. only final state..... then in the push load you want monitored displacement correct but then you click on conjugate displacement. decide which of two..... study before you upload videos.