Awesome car. Got one with 1.4 BoosterJet engine and it's fabulous to drive. Entry level SUVs from other manufacturers cost 5k+ more and have much, much weaker engines. Who cares about harder plastic on the doors while having such a wonderful engine. Fun to drive and comfortable car.
Yes. 2008 is really good looking car but way too small for my needs (I needed a family car). If you are looking for a fancy 'city SUV' then 2008 is a good choice. Also you may consider Renault Captur in that range. It's a bit spacier inside and very nice from the outside (2008 has nicer interior though). I did not dig deeper because I wanted a bit larger car.
Hi Richard, what did you think of the S-Cross? Thanks for your input too Johnny, we agree with you on this, it's a decent entry level SUV. If you guys want a more in-depth look at the 2008, here's our review: th-cam.com/video/Gkk1vnJ7UqQ/w-d-xo.html
Peugeot 2008 is waaaay too small I am 1,84 and could not fit in the drivers seat. Has the same space as 208. On the other hand I was impressed by this car's space and comfort. Between the 2008 and this one defin. SCross! The peugeot 3008 is another chapter.....
This is not aimed at the reviewer. We now have a generation of people obsessed with image and the "whos looking at me in my fancy car" brigade, and I really do think its completely pathetic. If you like a car then buy it, regardless of what anyone else thinks. If it bothers you that much and you only choose a certain brand because you worry what others will think then you are a very sad person with confidence issues. Ive had Audis, GTIs, allsorts of cars in the 32 years since I passed my test and I drive a cheapo Suzuki Celerio at the moment. Its a shopping car mainly, its fun to drive, very economical and very very reliable. It will do long journeys if required, although not at high speed :D. Do I give a shit what the neighbours think, or people on Facebook, or workmates ? No. I dont talk to the neighbours, I dont have a Facebook account and I have a van for work :D. Get over yourselves and drive what YOU want. Stop trying to be something youre not, be an individual and not a sheep. What would I get if I needed something else ? Maybe a Kia Ceed GT, the new Subaru Impreza hatchback or this S Cross with Allgrip. Thank you. Now its time for bed, with the good lady, been on the Westons cider keeping out of the bad weather all day. Cheers.
Purchased mine new in 2008 iawd 140hp 2.0 litre auto 4spd , 26 mpg , pwr windows, pwr dr locks, remote key fob, popup garmin nav 12" in disc brakes , got it as my everyday grocery getter. , legendary reliability nothing ever breaks to date , nothing flimsy about the dash or anything else. Solid , makes me smile when civics and little acuras are stuck spinning their tires in the snow and I can blow thru a foot of fresh snow without spinning a tire. Not for a big family. But its just right for a girlfriend a dog and some grocerys. I got my Sony 60" LED set in the box home from best buy in it laying horizontal right to the back of my front seat and the back door closed perfectly. Its not supposed to be a hotrod , the idiots at top gear apparently did not understand that. I think they were just trying to get a free ride from Suzuki and Suzuki told em to take a walk. I'd buy it again ! Not even a lightbulb has needed replacing in 10 years.
Just like their motorcycles, totally reliable,bullet proof, economical,well built and underrated, Purley because they aren't publicised enough!!!!!!!!?!!!
I liked the car especially for its aggressive grille and headlamps. Seeing the comments about 'ugly grille' I am confused as hell now. I want a car that looks good. Isn't the grille design something like those on BMW X series? I liked it
Hi! I am Ansh from India This thing exists in India too, I have one for around 5 years now! The pros of this cars are- 1) it gives a very very smooth ride even going at good speeds like 120-140 (kmph) 2) it has a light steering and takes turns like a beast like you can go 80-90 kmph on a like sharp cut!!! 3) it’s breaking are so good that from 100-0 it does that in 6 seconds 4) it’s 0-100 is 8.6 seconds (fully loaded) 5) it’s a light weight car 6) it got 180Kmph+ top speeds (perfect for high speed runs) 7) the horsepower on this is too good (140 hp) even when fully loaded it still touches 170 Kmph on highways 8) it is diesel powered so it doesn’t cost as much as petrol *the cons* 1) Has a little bit of turbo lag 2) reverse camera is a little laggy(may not be in other s-cross but mine has it) 3) gear shifting is not that good 4) the rims don’t look good on the car 5) they didn’t give volume knobs to control volume of music 6) accelerator pedal is hard to push fully… But overall it’s worth the price and if you were wondering it cost me around ~15,000 dollars (₹14.2 lakhs) for the second top variant (zeta) don’t know if you all have that in UK but we have a lot of options in India
I can not believe that Suzuki pulled out of the North American market. With the small CUV market lead all other segments, it was a major error on Suzuki's operations. They could have wiped Mitsubishi with out trying too hard. All they really needed to do was get a decent dealer network.
Ask them to bring in 6 airbags too, they have been cutting on safety. All others brands have started giving multiple airbags and other safety tech in India. Only suzuki has been ignoring this, 6 airbags and a auto gear box .....win win combo.
Hi thank you for a straight forward competent car review.I'll be changing my Moka 1 4.turbo elite at the end of 2019.And as a pensioner, i think this Crossover maybe a nice comfortable car to think about. I know you can't show bias to-wards other cars.But as my wife and i need a higher exit & .entry car with front and back sensors, with heated seats. Owing to the fact that both of us have severe back pain problems. I would just like to ask you, if this would be a suitable car for our needs. If anyone on here has driven or owns one of these cars. I would appreciate it, if they could advise an 80 yr.old pensioner if this could be the car for me.? Ps. I receive my car via the Motability scheme, so i'll probably go for the top spec.Thanks in advance for your advice.👍
We were sitting in an xcross mmming and aaahing, this good honest review secured the decision and sale. Thanks for the great vid. Short and strait to the point.
Just About The Perfect TH-cam Car Review With A Pleasing Understated Reviewer And Loads Of Information You Really Need To Know If You Are Thinking Of Buying The Car Displayed, I'm Reviewing The Video Not The Suzuki S-Cross However both Get A Strong Thumps Up From Me.
Just got a 2016 (66)S-Cross SZ5 diesel auto TCSS (twin clutch). Like it very much. Seems a lot of equipment for what I paid. No complaints whatsoever. Comfortable and, seemingly, with a good mpg range.
I have had many suzuki over the years 2001 ignis, and my current 04 liana 1.6 to name some. There very reliable up until about 120k miles then they fall bits and become a money pit which is why im unsure about another suzuki now. Shame i realy like this car.
Dont underestimate the 3 cylinder 1.0 Boosterjet engine I was impressed enough after a test drive to order one (coming in March), to say I was surprised by its performance is an understatement considering its engine size.
Its a cross over not a full on SUV, majority people who buys cross over never take it off road or towing... if you want it for towing obviously you need the bigger engine.
Ofcourse, and that's my point, if you're going to use it as a hatchback, you might aswell get a real hatchback and get better prices and fuel economy. That's just my opinion ofcourse.
I do see where your coming from but these cars are basically hatchbacks but with loads of space inside, small families may want more space.. Most cross overs are fuel efficient and this one is cheaper most family hatchbacks.
Hola a todos : Solo vengo a informar que existe un foro para el S-Cross Sx4 Suzuki . Desde el comienzo de este con el Sx4 del 2006 , pasando por la segunda generación S-Cross 2013-2016 hasta la ultima generación del S -Cross 2016-2017. Es un foro especifico del S-Cross en castellano . Viendo que no existe gran información sobre este modelo de S-Cross Sx4 Suzuki sobre todo en España ya sea en internet o en prensa escrita y es un gran desconocido por estos sitios . Por eso de un foro dedicado solo a S-Cross Suzuki y poder dar a conocer y ayudar entre todos sobre este modelo en concreto . Espero que sea un foro amigo de este sitio Sin mas un saludo para todos y muchas gracias a todos y espero no haber sido mal educado , ni molestado a nadie , ni haberme entrometido con todos vosotros . Si es asi espero que me perdonen y pido mil disculpas . Aquí el foro : s-cross-sx4-suzuki.foroactivo.com/
Hi Vignesh, there are some spec differences as Johnny said above. Aside from that, we think the Vitara is a touch more stylish, whereas the S-Cross is more of a rugged SUV. You can take a look at our Vitara review here and decide for yourself, let us know what you think: th-cam.com/video/jCQYHzFLGw4/w-d-xo.html
Car Keys UK thank you very much for the response. i too agree, Vitara is a tad stylish, has a better engine choice (1.4 turbo vs the 1.0 on S cross). What scares me about Suzuki is the thin sheet metal which seems to be the only major difference/weight saving initiative among their whole range compared to the rest of the competition even though they are NCAP 5 star. What are your thoughts on this aspect? easy to dent, potentially less safe?, more prone to catching Cross winds etc.?
You can always buy an old heavy model). Now completely different standards. Less metal, but it is alloyed steel. Wings of thin metal, but its competitors are generally made of plastic!
@@vigneshn.y3048 The S-Cross is available with the 1.4 turbo engine as well as four wheel drive. Furthermore, the S-Cross definitely looks more attractive than Vitara (whose design is quite awkward).
Just bought one picking it up in two days, I own a vitara 1.6 szt all grip 2017, lovely motor ,but lacks the power of the s-cross ,I had the chance to drive this engine a couple of days ago it is like chalk and cheese you instantly feel the difference
Hi Firasat, we are taking the Ignis out on February 6th, so check back sometime in Feb for a full review from the guys. What did you think of the S-Cross?
I don't know whether this one has the same system as the old one (pre-facelift) but the all-grip option came with auto, sport and snow-lock. Most people don't know but sport mode on the old one made it rear-wheel drive. However i don't know if this one does or not.
Dazza Isaac Lancia were good cars back in the day, although maybe they rusted a lot, but your point is what exactly ? They were also sports cars. This is an SUV type car, totally different. I bet your car has some similarity to an older model in some way. Does it matter ?
You sound like the sort of person who posts negative comments about everything on here, whereas other people see the positives in life. If I dont like something, thats my own private thought on the matter. It doesnt benefit anyone if I start moaning about it.
I don´t believe you´ve driven both cars because S-cross is far better that the piece of crap like Duster. Duster is the cheapest car from this segment for the reason. The handling is absolutelly horrible , gearbox too, etc. my old 1993 VW Golf is much better than Duster. I understand that people that have no money will buy this car but you can´t say this car is superior. :DD It´s really not.
Dacia hahahahaha they are basically a Renault in poor mans clothes, not exactly famous for reliability value or build quality, drove a duster and it was depressingly boring both in the drive and the looks. anybody who thinks a Dacia is a good car must have had of the lobotomy.
Awesome car. Got one with 1.4 BoosterJet engine and it's fabulous to drive. Entry level SUVs from other manufacturers cost 5k+ more and have much, much weaker engines. Who cares about harder plastic on the doors while having such a wonderful engine. Fun to drive and comfortable car.
Yes. 2008 is really good looking car but way too small for my needs (I needed a family car). If you are looking for a fancy 'city SUV' then 2008 is a good choice. Also you may consider Renault Captur in that range. It's a bit spacier inside and very nice from the outside (2008 has nicer interior though). I did not dig deeper because I wanted a bit larger car.
Hi Richard, what did you think of the S-Cross? Thanks for your input too Johnny, we agree with you on this, it's a decent entry level SUV. If you guys want a more in-depth look at the 2008, here's our review: th-cam.com/video/Gkk1vnJ7UqQ/w-d-xo.html
How about the handlig ? what did you think ?
Peugeot 2008 is waaaay too small I am 1,84 and could not fit in the drivers seat. Has the same space as 208. On the other hand I was impressed by this car's space and comfort. Between the 2008 and this one defin. SCross! The peugeot 3008 is another chapter.....
Hard plastic is also a lot easier to clean than fancy upholstered material.
With the petrol engine upgrade, and the nicer exterior I think the S-cross got a lot more interesting...
This is not aimed at the reviewer. We now have a generation of people obsessed with image and the "whos looking at me in my fancy car" brigade, and I really do think its completely pathetic. If you like a car then buy it, regardless of what anyone else thinks. If it bothers you that much and you only choose a certain brand because you worry what others will think then you are a very sad person with confidence issues. Ive had Audis, GTIs, allsorts of cars in the 32 years since I passed my test and I drive a cheapo Suzuki Celerio at the moment. Its a shopping car mainly, its fun to drive, very economical and very very reliable. It will do long journeys if required, although not at high speed :D. Do I give a shit what the neighbours think, or people on Facebook, or workmates ? No. I dont talk to the neighbours, I dont have a Facebook account and I have a van for work :D. Get over yourselves and drive what YOU want. Stop trying to be something youre not, be an individual and not a sheep. What would I get if I needed something else ? Maybe a Kia Ceed GT, the new Subaru Impreza hatchback or this S Cross with Allgrip. Thank you. Now its time for bed, with the good lady, been on the Westons cider keeping out of the bad weather all day. Cheers.
Purchased mine new in 2008 iawd 140hp 2.0 litre auto 4spd , 26 mpg , pwr windows, pwr dr locks, remote key fob, popup garmin nav 12" in disc brakes , got it as my everyday grocery getter. , legendary reliability nothing ever breaks to date , nothing flimsy about the dash or anything else. Solid , makes me smile when civics and little acuras are stuck spinning their tires in the snow and I can blow thru a foot of fresh snow without spinning a tire. Not for a big family. But its just right for a girlfriend a dog and some grocerys. I got my Sony 60" LED set in the box home from best buy in it laying horizontal right to the back of my front seat and the back door closed perfectly. Its not supposed to be a hotrod , the idiots at top gear apparently did not understand that. I think they were just trying to get a free ride from Suzuki and Suzuki told em to take a walk. I'd buy it again ! Not even a lightbulb has needed replacing in 10 years.
For two litre engine, what was the fuel like on it?
Just like their motorcycles, totally reliable,bullet proof, economical,well built and underrated, Purley because they aren't publicised enough!!!!!!!!?!!!
Best "bang for buck" small SUV hands down.. I drive diesel and it great car. One of those cars that grow into you with time..
Why are all car presenters so scruffily dressed to present
I liked the car especially for its aggressive grille and headlamps. Seeing the comments about 'ugly grille' I am confused as hell now. I want a car that looks good. Isn't the grille design something like those on BMW X series? I liked it
Akshay Sharma I thought I was the only one that noticed the similarities with the BMW x1
Great car. Very reliable brand. You get a lot of car for your money with Suzuki.
Hi! I am Ansh from India
This thing exists in India too, I have one for around 5 years now!
The pros of this cars are-
1) it gives a very very smooth ride even going at good speeds like 120-140 (kmph)
2) it has a light steering and takes turns like a beast like you can go 80-90 kmph on a like sharp cut!!!
3) it’s breaking are so good that from 100-0 it does that in 6 seconds
4) it’s 0-100 is 8.6 seconds (fully loaded)
5) it’s a light weight car
6) it got 180Kmph+ top speeds (perfect for high speed runs)
7) the horsepower on this is too good (140 hp) even when fully loaded it still touches 170 Kmph on highways
8) it is diesel powered so it doesn’t cost as much as petrol
*the cons*
1) Has a little bit of turbo lag
2) reverse camera is a little laggy(may not be in other s-cross but mine has it)
3) gear shifting is not that good
4) the rims don’t look good on the car
5) they didn’t give volume knobs to control volume of music
6) accelerator pedal is hard to push fully…
But overall it’s worth the price and if you were wondering it cost me around ~15,000 dollars (₹14.2 lakhs) for the second top variant (zeta) don’t know if you all have that in UK but we have a lot of options in India
Great car suzuki!
I can not believe that Suzuki pulled out of the North American market. With the small CUV market lead all other segments, it was a major error on Suzuki's operations. They could have wiped Mitsubishi with out trying too hard. All they really needed to do was get a decent dealer network.
Beautiful car! I want one as my third car 😍
I luv my 2013 SX4 ... insanely reliable so far.... alas, I live in USA... and Suzuki cars are no longer sold here .... I'd buy a new one.... damn.
1.0 booster does 111bhp not 109. 170nm torque performs like a 1.8 non-turbo.
Looking at this and comparing it with the Indian Variant makes me cry.
SB The Pikachu loved this red color, hope they introduce this in our country.
Ask them to bring in 6 airbags too, they have been cutting on safety. All others brands have started giving multiple airbags and other safety tech in India. Only suzuki has been ignoring this, 6 airbags and a auto gear box .....win win combo.
Hi thank you for a straight forward competent car review.I'll be changing my Moka 1 4.turbo elite at the end of 2019.And as a pensioner, i think this Crossover maybe a nice comfortable car to think about.
I know you can't show bias to-wards other cars.But as my wife and i need a higher exit & .entry car with front and back sensors, with heated seats.
Owing to the fact that both of us have severe back pain problems.
I would just like to ask you, if this would be a suitable car for our needs.
If anyone on here has driven or owns one of these cars. I would appreciate it, if they could advise an 80 yr.old pensioner if this could be the car for me.? Ps. I receive my car via the Motability scheme, so i'll probably go for the top spec.Thanks in advance for your advice.👍
James Ure I see pensioners drive them here in Hungary all the time. Youngins tend to go for the Vitara where I live
We were sitting in an xcross mmming and aaahing, this good honest review secured the decision and sale. Thanks for the great vid. Short and strait to the point.
You should have tried an S-Cross instead...;)
Just About The Perfect TH-cam Car Review With A Pleasing Understated Reviewer And Loads Of Information You Really Need To Know If You Are Thinking Of Buying The Car Displayed, I'm Reviewing The Video Not The Suzuki S-Cross However both Get A Strong Thumps Up From Me.
which one would you recommend between this and the vitara regarding drivability and comfort?
"hi5 namaste" very cool video buddy:-*
Just got a 2016 (66)S-Cross SZ5 diesel auto TCSS (twin clutch). Like it very much. Seems a lot of equipment for what I paid. No complaints whatsoever. Comfortable and, seemingly, with a good mpg range.
These seems to be the general opinion of Suzuki; a lot of car for the money :D
I have had many suzuki over the years 2001 ignis, and my current 04 liana 1.6 to name some. There very reliable up until about 120k miles then they fall bits and become a money pit which is why im unsure about another suzuki now. Shame i realy like this car.
It's not really that cheap though when you select a decent engine..
Dont underestimate the 3 cylinder 1.0 Boosterjet engine I was impressed enough after a test drive to order one (coming in March), to say I was surprised by its performance is an understatement considering its engine size.
but it'll never be a good towing- or offroad car because it has no torque, which kind of defeats the purpose of having such an 'SUV' doesn't it
Its a cross over not a full on SUV, majority people who buys cross over never take it off road or towing... if you want it for towing obviously you need the bigger engine.
Ofcourse, and that's my point, if you're going to use it as a hatchback, you might aswell get a real hatchback and get better prices and fuel economy.
That's just my opinion ofcourse.
I do see where your coming from but these cars are basically hatchbacks but with loads of space inside, small families may want more space.. Most cross overs are fuel efficient and this one is cheaper most family hatchbacks.
Hi, thanks for the review. Is it a quiet ride?
Good review. It seems there is no spare wheel with this car though. What are you supposed to do if you get a flat?
I love mine! 1000 3 cyl auto-- 43-46 mpg ... i had an A3 flying skateboard.. suzuki anyday!! nice high driving posision
The looks are definitely better than the previous version.When does this come to india??????
Can't wait to get my hands on this boosterjet engine .
Is there any m,uch difference beetween 2014 and 2016 version? Body wise interior?
It's like someone microwaved & chromed the front of a Dodge Dart then stuck it on a Suzuki
Nice review bro
OK
Interesting review as I have 1.6 petrol engine 66 reg, and both front and back parking sensors.
Hola a todos :
Solo vengo a informar que existe un foro para el S-Cross Sx4 Suzuki .
Desde el comienzo de este con el Sx4 del 2006 , pasando por la segunda generación S-Cross 2013-2016 hasta la ultima generación del S -Cross 2016-2017.
Es un foro especifico del S-Cross en castellano . Viendo que no existe gran información sobre este modelo de S-Cross Sx4 Suzuki sobre todo en España ya sea en internet o en prensa escrita y es un gran desconocido por estos sitios .
Por eso de un foro dedicado solo a S-Cross Suzuki y poder dar a conocer y ayudar entre todos sobre este modelo en concreto .
Espero que sea un foro amigo de este sitio
Sin mas un saludo para todos y muchas gracias a todos y espero no haber sido mal educado , ni molestado a nadie , ni haberme entrometido con todos vosotros .
Si es asi espero que me perdonen y pido mil disculpas .
Aquí el foro :
s-cross-sx4-suzuki.foroactivo.com/
arer can /
In india it comes with only 2 Air bags
I have the 14 plate diesel and I love It
Does it comes with LSD (limited slip differential)?
The 1000 cc one ..does that mean cheap tax ???
1.7L would be more of a fit. 1.0 is too small. Good design and visibility. High price tag for a Suzuki!
new peugeot 3008 review please
Nice
Baleno or S-cross???
Mk11 Grand Vitara
does uk people buy suzuki cars ???
Some do!
Some does.
I do.
price in India is 20.78 lacs
Ask suzuki if you can have 1 for free if you let them give you 20 lashes
great video shot in a pretty location. what's the difference between the SCross and Vitara. Both seem to be city crossovers to me?
S-cross is around 15 cm longer and that resulted in more leg space and bigger boot. It also has nicer interior with some soft plastic.
Hi Vignesh, there are some spec differences as Johnny said above. Aside from that, we think the Vitara is a touch more stylish, whereas the S-Cross is more of a rugged SUV. You can take a look at our Vitara review here and decide for yourself, let us know what you think: th-cam.com/video/jCQYHzFLGw4/w-d-xo.html
Car Keys UK thank you very much for the response. i too agree, Vitara is a tad stylish, has a better engine choice (1.4 turbo vs the 1.0 on S cross). What scares me about Suzuki is the thin sheet metal which seems to be the only major difference/weight saving initiative among their whole range compared to the rest of the competition even though they are NCAP 5 star. What are your thoughts on this aspect? easy to dent, potentially less safe?, more prone to catching Cross winds etc.?
You can always buy an old heavy model). Now completely different standards. Less metal, but it is alloyed steel. Wings of thin metal, but its competitors are generally made of plastic!
@@vigneshn.y3048 The S-Cross is available with the 1.4 turbo engine as well as four wheel drive. Furthermore, the S-Cross definitely looks more attractive than Vitara (whose design is quite awkward).
Just bought one picking it up in two days, I own a vitara 1.6 szt all grip 2017, lovely motor ,but lacks the power of the s-cross ,I had the chance to drive this engine a couple of days ago it is like chalk and cheese you instantly feel the difference
Suzuki Ignis review plz
Hi Firasat, we are taking the Ignis out on February 6th, so check back sometime in Feb for a full review from the guys. What did you think of the S-Cross?
Car Keys UK Well that's a good car & the host explained every point clearly. On the whole , a good review 👌
maruti suzuki
copycat idiots
front grill copy of Maserati signature grill
n structure copy of levante from maserati .....
good car
Same bad quality interior....some one tell thus suzuki..not to loot people money...give them all of their money...
Ant & Decs car lol
looks like the illegitimate child of a couple of 90's Ssangyongs...
I don't know whether this one has the same system as the old one (pre-facelift) but the all-grip option came with auto, sport and snow-lock. Most people don't know but sport mode on the old one made it rear-wheel drive. However i don't know if this one does or not.
That's not true.
Porsche 911 turbo S is better.
Mercedes GLC counterfeit
Not a fan
What puts you off *****?
Car Keys UK the front looks like it's a left over part from something like a Lancia
Dazza Isaac Lancia were good cars back in the day, although maybe they rusted a lot, but your point is what exactly ? They were also sports cars. This is an SUV type car, totally different. I bet your car has some similarity to an older model in some way. Does it matter ?
Already looking pretty dated. And that front-grill is FUGLY!
And I like the car mostly because of that grille. Something is wrong here :P
You sound like the sort of person who posts negative comments about everything on here, whereas other people see the positives in life. If I dont like something, thats my own private thought on the matter. It doesnt benefit anyone if I start moaning about it.
Hideous. They totally spoilt the admittedly bland original, with something that's offensive to the eyes from the front!
this is totally overpriced car nothing admirable.Daci Duster lot better nd cheaper car.i have driven both nd found Duster superior
Duster is a compact SUV and this is a cross-over. Wrong comparison bro.
satish k4kk4ds@hotmail.co.uk The Duster doesnt have nearly as many extras and isn't as comfortable. The S-Cross has everything you need and then some.
I don´t believe you´ve driven both cars because S-cross is far better that the piece of crap like Duster. Duster is the cheapest car from this segment for the reason. The handling is absolutelly horrible , gearbox too, etc. my old 1993 VW Golf is much better than Duster. I understand that people that have no money will buy this car but you can´t say this car is superior. :DD It´s really not.
A duster is for cleaning your house.
Dacia hahahahaha they are basically a Renault in poor mans clothes, not exactly famous for reliability value or build quality, drove a duster and it was depressingly boring both in the drive and the looks. anybody who thinks a Dacia is a good car must have had of the lobotomy.