"Power Grab": Supreme Court Overturns 4 Decades of Federal Regulatory Control, Hands Power to Courts
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มิ.ย. 2024
- Support our work: democracynow.org/donate/sm-de...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday approved a power grab by corporate interests who want to strip federal agencies of their power to regulate public health, the climate and environment, worker protection and more. In the 6-3 ruling, the court’s conservative majority overturned a precedent known as the Chevron doctrine, which established that judges should defer to federal agencies on interpreting a law if Congress did not specifically address the issue. We speak with Mustafa Ali, former head of the environmental justice program at the Environmental Protection Agency, who describes it as “a very devastating decision,” and to The Nation's justice correspondent, Elie Mystal. “It's taking power out of our hands, out of the democracy’s hands, and putting it in the hands of the court,” says Mystal, who also addresses other recent rulings from the court at the end of its term, including the highly anticipated ruling on presidential immunity.
Democracy Now! is an independent global news hour that airs on over 1,500 TV and radio stations Monday through Friday. Watch our livestream at democracynow.org Mondays to Fridays 8-9 a.m. ET.
Subscribe to our Daily Email Digest: democracynow.org/subscribe
It truly is a horror in our country when we have more homeless brothers and sisters and instead of reaching out with help our Supreme Court justices takes more away
As a citizen, i dont feel represented by any of these stupid politicians
Well you should find who your senators and representative are, and interact with them, and participate in the democratic process. I mean my senators and representative are all a bunch of complete scum, but I still have a voice.
@@EndDimswe all have a voice, most politicians have no interest in our needs without some sort of incentive.
@@EndDimsOr sue the government to eliminate the Chevron ruling.😂
And No!
Her analysis is absurd!
The Chevron ruling was abused and used to terrorize companies into compliance.
For instance, the Apple farmers were taxed to support the regulation agency that put them out of business. The Apple growers send to Apples to the processors that take their cut and pay the growers what's left. The growers can't increase their prices to offset the tax and go under.
This is just one example of the abuse!!!
@@bradjones5107
So there was over-regulation.
Now there will be no regulation:
No regulation of water purity.
No regulation of food purity-meaning many customers outside the country will ban at least some of our food products.
No regulation of drug safety-medicine becomes a roll of the dice.
No pollution regulations-
cancer deaths, respiratory illness deaths, and heart attacks will climb.
No clean water-in rivers OR our drinking water.
BS.
Many of the losses you deplore are not affected by this ruling.
There IS existing law for each example you site.
If you believe more laws are needed, contact your legislative representatives and get the ball rolling.
These three letter agencies have NO AUTHORITY to make law.
Unfun facts. The majority of homeless people in the US have jobs, and nationally, on average, there are 33 empty homes per homeless person. However, there's many more in some states. Mississippi is the worst with 250 vacant homes per homeless person.
That most likely means a low rate of homelessness
There's nothing democratic about unelected agencies regulating our lives. You're defending the oligarchy not the people.
Yes!
Let’s have corporations regulate themselves that’s a great idea. Better yet let’s have a bunch of councils with untrained and uneducated citizens regulating pollution, product and food safety, aviation, and work place safety.
Well you’re defending the Oligopoly … I wonder which is worse … he says glancing at his Dickens collection
That's not how the laws work. The Congress created these agencies with specialists who know how to enact policy like how stupid the Supreme Court Justice was with gas issue. Only legal experts on clean air, clean water, food and health would know how to enact policy to reflect the law's requirements for such clean outcomes. Our Congress would be mired by decades of infighting born of ignorance by people like you. Congress only is able to learn so much about a subject hence why they defer to agencies to enact policies which help people and enforce the regulations born from their laws. What you are arguing for is insanity.
BESIDES.... WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY..... We are a Constitutional Republic.
As stated, Congress needs to get off their arses and do their jobs as intended by the framers.
An how do you suppose they do that when Beijing Bidens department of Injustice, I'm sorry scum bag Obama's department of Injustice refuses to follow the constitution and Americans civil rights? Garland is a corrupt traitor to the American people that only does political hit jobs just like the rest of the Democrap socialist party an that being said the rino establishment isn't any better.
Alphabet Agencies are corrupt.
You can research. Starting with
Garland, Mayorkas, Schiff, Wray.
Blaming Congress is looking at
symptoms instead of viruses.
The Republicans are trying , but get blocked by DEMS.
Not going to happen unless we get republicans out of office.
Any laws they pass can be struck down by conservative lower courts and then struck down by this court next term. That’s the problem. But yes, I agree. Pass legislation immediately.
WE are the PEOPLE WE are waiting for.
WATCHING & WAITING TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER
Can't wait to VOTE in November!!!!!!! 0:54
Nice sentiment. What exactly do you propose we do about the Supreme Court? I'm getting tired of people spouting vague platitudes with no idea how to actually DO anything.
@@Serai3 Bidens second term will start with an expansion of the court, along with term limits, if we can get Mike "johnson" out of the way. He is like a puppet, sitting on donnies lap, waiting to have his string pulled so he can go confess his arousal to his son.
@@Serai3There is nothing we can do aside from voting while we still can - unless we find some billionaires that can outspend corporate and religious interests. Sadly, I don’t think any exist.
if this doesn't show that we are living in a fascist state I really do not know what else the people need to get off their asses and take OUR government back.
@@vasagowarlock8460
A million people, peaceful, but with the means of self-defense, occupying Washington?
@@vasagowarlock8460
(It would take money and organization. Think of the porta-potty rentals.)
When enough ppl become homeless and they are charged by the courts of being homeless then they will open the camps.
Yeah but the Fascists are also talking about taking their country back.
Our economy is afflicted by uncertainty, housing troubles, foreclosures, global shifts, and the aftermath of the epidemic, all of which contribute to instability. To restore stability and drive growth, all sectors must urgently address rising inflation, slowing GDP, and trade disruptions.
The US dollar is losing value due to inflation, while other currencies are gaining strength, creating uncertainty. Nonetheless, many people remain confident in the Dollar's perceived safety. I'm concerned that my 420K retirement funds may lose value, therefore I'm looking for other financial stability.
With my stressful career, I don't have time for investment analysis. For seven years, a fiduciary has managed my portfolio, responding to market situations, ensuring for effective navigation and informed decisions. Consider taking a similar plan of action.
Do you mind if I ask you to recommend the coach you employed? It seems you've figured it all out.
My CFA, 'Leah Foster Alderman', is a well known figure in her field. I recommend looking into her qualifications further. She has extensive knowledge and is a treasure trove for anyone seeking to manage the financial markets.
her handler was simple to locate and appears to be extremely capable and adaptable. We scheduled a phone conversation.
Legislative branch creates law, judicial branch interprets law, executive branch enforces law. Corporations captured the regulatory agencies decades ago and use their corporate capture and chevron doctrine to create interpretations of law favorable to them. This HURTS corporations not helps them.
YES the regulations hurt smaller business where the corporations can absorb the costs and put their smaller competitors out of business.
This "news" outlet is a mouthpiece for Techno-Fascism... they love corporations and regulatory capture- so they won't comprehend this at all.
Of course, their darling corporations would never hurt a fly. 😂
This ruling will get rid of all beaurocratic rules not voted on by Congress and that is the workings of a representative Republic!!! God bless SCOTUS!!
The 3 parties of government have to be independent which won't happen under Project2025.
We are being set up for dictatorship.
They will find a way to use this to their benefit. Don't worry. They always do. As long as the government and big business have their hands in each other's pockets, they always will
Removing federal overreach has always been the constitutional mandate of the Supreme Court. The executive branch has NEVER had constitutional authority to rule by fiat ("rules"), established law ever since "Marbury vs Madison".
That's why tRumps fiat tax cut for the wealthiest .1% of Americans went through, they are so thoughtful and non corrupt!
executive branch now has almost free reign they said.
Conservatives always complained that the Democrats did that.. yet .. ... here we are. and they are not saying peep.
@@Aldarionz9Nope.
@@sr2291 thats all you have to say?
Gorsuch stating nitrous oxide instead of nitrogen oxide is the epitome of precisely why deference to experts is absolutely necessary and the Chevron doctrine should have been upheld. Judges are not experts in environmental issues!!!
He probably has fond memories from his drunken frat boy days, inhaling nitrous inbetween beers; He figures "no big deal."
No regulations are for the powerful keeping the small small,
The political doners don't follow the rules, they just have their lawyers settle it where we get screwed. Not to mention low IQ, the problem with this country right now is the administrative bureaucracy.
This is sad! The unraveling of every aspect of the government that I thought would be safeguarded by law, i.e. voting rights, environmental rights, rights that should be left up to the liberty of the individual, whatever that may be, be “gutted”. It’s crazy.
Those agencies dictated over your individual liberties. Did you have a water puddle in your lawn one year? The EPA declared your property a wetland and you weren't allowed to drain it. Now if anyone tries to stop you, you can litigate for your rights. Yes, making up laws on the fly by a beurocracy was a lot faster and easier, but it never landed on the side of your personal liberties. Wow, maybe our property doesn't have to be surrendered to hiking trails anymore. Nothing worse than waking up one morning with a bunch of e-bikes tooling through your backyard and suing you, the property owner, if they got hurt because some beaurocrat decided you should allow people to trample your petunias for their useless nature trail program. Now you can argue for your right to private property in court. And yes there are going to be some bad actors taking advantage, but we do have local and state legislation, not just Congress for legal remedies.
The role of the courts is explicitly to interpret the law.
That's what they did.
No what they did is legislate from the bench. Some are just clueless about how laws were designed to work. This Court isn't clueless, just corrupted. @@chocomalk
@@samstewart9249 So when SCOTUS agrees with you, it's a good thing, when it disagrees with you, it's a bad thing. Got it.
@@samstewart9249 It stopped regulatory agencies from creating law by fiat.
Wrong! Ever heard of case law?
Uh, the regulations of agencies shouldn’t be off limits to constitutional scrutiny. Congress would just write vague laws intentionally to prevent judicial review of federal agencies.
You're talking sense to a leftist. They are beyond redemption.
Chevron never prevented judicial review of regulatory agencies. It simply allowed the agencies built for the express purpose of translating legislation into action the first crack at interpreting the legislation. The judiciary still operated as the ultimate backstop under Chevron.
This decision simply says that things will continue to operate in the same way, but the Judiciary should deprioritize the regulatory agency's expertise relative to the opinion of private interests and the judge's own gut feeling.
Just like how judges can interpret the law, in fields they have no knowledge of, in any way they want
It's time to go back to America first without the interference of unelected beurocrats and criminals after jan20 2025 alot of them will mysteriously self delete because they know too much 🙄check Hillarys phone pings after jan20 2025 😂🇺🇸
Uh, Congress is filled with people who have NO education in science, technology, or medicine. They have NO ability to make informed decisions on policy regarding those subjects. THINK next time before you spout nonsensical propaganda.
What's more ironic, democracy now mad at democracy, or democracy now mad on how a constitution republic works.
Completely unworkable, the judiciary is going to be log-jammed with rule challenges and Congress will be completely unable to legislate
So now those federal agencies have been reined in and congress members will have to do their job as the constitution deems!!!
Now Congress CAN do their jobs !
Heads of Alphabet Agencies
are currently IN Contempt of Congress, ignoring Subpoenas.
@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7scyou mean the Republican representatives that refuse to answer subpoenas
Isn't it because when politicians decide matters involving money and cost, it is like an open path to corruption?
Being a modern politician is selling the people that you care about them while being a self interested as you can get away with.
I don’t see taking power away from the 3 letter agencies as that bad.
Explain to me how putting the regulations back into the hands of legislature is a power grab!
It doesn’t follow THEIR narrative
Because you can't let the wolf watch the henhouse. Next time a train rolls over and dumps 100,000 gallons of toxic waste into your water, do you want the EPA in charge of the clean up or some local judge that got a new motor home to rule in the railroads favor.
@@tjewett1967how is East Palestine working out? Oh, yeah, utter disaster. The federal government shouldn’t be involved in any of this! Defund all of these agencies.
Anyone who supports any federal agency after COVID has brain damage beyond repair
They really did not think this one through
@@tjewett1967because the EPA did so well in Ohio, right. Lol
Awesome news.
Agencies have Not a Drop of Constitutionality to Create Law.
Make our Congress drop campaigning to carry out their Constitutional Duties.
Alphabet Agencies are currently in
“Contempt of Congress”
Garland, Mayorkas, Schiff, Wray
Awesome news until a rail car dumps 80,000 gallons of toxic waste in your yard.
Please explain how you will get Congress to stop campaigning and start making actual needed legislation?
What actually happened with the strike down of Chevron is that Congress makes law, not agencies. If they want a law they go to congress. Simple as that. Unelected employees of government agencies should not make laws (regulations).
Congress doesn't have the time, staff, or expertise to do that. That's why they delegate. It's kind of like when a dad says follow the babysitter's rules. It would be impractical to run things any other way.
@yessum15 That's literally their job and that's what scotus recognized..If you want agencies making laws you should advocate for a constitutional amendment
@@onlyinamerica4916 There's a difference between a law and a regulation. I want legislators writing laws and regulators writing regulations.
Next up let's sue the government for term limits and age limits for all politicians.
You have people in Congress, who are complete idiots, but are popular in their own state. They do not have the interest of the country at heart, and they do not have the expertise to regulate on the matters that have been delegated to the EPA.
Of course the supreme Court did the right thing. We do not need unelected bureaucrats making our rules
IF a law is too ambiguous, it is up to the legislation branch to fix it, not allow unelected bureaucrats to run wild.
Oh no! How are we going to implement woke policies now??? The Supreme Court has no right to take away power from unelected administrators that make regulations. Arrgggghhhhhhhhh
No, just those willing to bow to an attempted insurrectionist
@@michaelccopelandsr7120 They did not surrender to the democrats. Evidence has come out that there was fake ballots and such that would have swayed the election the other way, meaning that the ones doing the insurrection was the democrats.
@@michaelccopelandsr7120 I have bad news. The insurrection happend 61 years ago and their puppets on both the right and left have been running the clown show since.
FINALLY!! POWER RETURNED TO THE PEOPLE!! ABOUT TIME We will vote on what we want representatives positions to be!!
NOT LOBBYIST!! Agencies cannot speak for the people, but rather WORK FOR US, by.informing us, and letting us vote on any regulatory mandates!! Power must be given back to the people with full total transparency!!!
did you listen to the f.cking story? or ar you a
If you intend on voting for every regulatory mandate necessary to run the country you would spend your entire day voting and doing nothing else.
Do you really have an informed opinion on the proper protocol for strength of sonar broadcast during urgent but non-critical vessel movement in commercial ships engaged in intrafirm trade for domestic entities carrying second country manufactured products operated by third country staff between 10 and 12 nautical miles from shore?
Power is not in your hands. They took power from you and gave it all to corporations. And are you so naive to think business will have the public good in mind, or the quarterly stock dividends?
This is power returned to corporations you fool. It's playing into the hands of the billionaires that paid off the court.
No, this keeps unelected administrative people from setting law. Congress needs to pass laws that are more specific about the powers they are giving agencies.
The ruling protects unelected oligarchs from accountability from abuses in the workplace and of the environment.
Who elected these judges? Nobody lmaooo. Id rather have specialized agencies make laws for the subjects they intimately know instead of activist judges who do whatever corporate interests want. No shit corporate interests can infiltrate fed agencies but acting like the judiciary is someone exempt from that influence is hillarious. Nobody is coming to help you
Sounds like you're on board with Project2025. Led by the rightwing Heritage Foundation, the project showcases a federal government that cracks down intensely on immigration, vanquishes LGBTQ+ and abortion rights, diminishes environmental protections, overhauls financial policy.
@@Thurnishaley6969id rather the country work as intended. Where the house and Senate makes laws, the court interprets laws, and the president signs laws.
No unconstitutional laws being made by unelected unauthorized agencies.
@@Rhythmiconswhen the ultimate arbiter is the supreme Court HOW ARE THEY ELECTED?
😂😂😂 these people, "taking the power away from the people" by empowering the citizens to be part of the laws congress passes? Those "unelected judges" are millions of time better than "unelected bureaucrats in agencies without authority to legislate"
Not when they are controlled by a maga whacko who is soley driven by a profit mindset and thats all…..however, this just shows how all democrats must vote out all right wing conservatives down the ballot for years and years……president Biden must enlarge the supreme court and because of the ruling that a president has amunity for all acts done in office thanks to this same supreme court, Biden should give seal team six a call later on this afternoon so they can take care of a problem or two.
Tf are u talking ab. This didn't give US any say in this, all it did was strip the EXPERTS from being included in the discussion. There is a reason why we have a federal and state government, people are stupid af.
If you think "congress" and "people power" belong in the same sentence, you're delusional.
funny he was talking about laughing gas, i wish i fucking had that right now to take my mind off this fascist hellscape
Buy some whipped cream its just as yummy but in the can always in the can.
Now people can actually hold federal agencies accountable, wow can you imagine my shock that DN thinks this is bad.
It should be called: "Democracy" Now 😂
not for the people they are for "mob" rule
@@StephanosBlack 😂 perfect.
🔥🔥🔥Bless the truth tellers.
ture .
Oh yeah these people really care about us while they're cutting children apart
When we find the kidnapped children in political camps then you can complain about the lot of children. Abortion and sex servitude should be absolutely aberrant to all citizens that are not perverted.
No one’s cutting kids up, weirdo.
why u need to make up stuff when they are openly bombing children in the middle east?
For Supreme Court Justices:
-12-year term limits
-Voted on by the people (not the president and congress) every 4 years.
- Ethics Oversight administered by the circuit court justices in conjuction with the national bar association. (Or, someone/organization that has no attachment to the outcome of cases . . . Not sure who this might be, but congress had utterly failed - can't be them.)
- Addition of 4 Justices to the Supreme Court to total 13 to bring parity with the number of circuit courts.
This is exactly what was needed decades ago. I am glad that it came to a head and has now been decided. We The People, not Them the Bureaus.
Tell that to the families of those who die in train accidents because they have no regulations
@@cindypyle7047 Regulations are fine, when they are PROPERLY placed by AUTHORIZED authorities. This ruling fixes the holes. Only the Carte Blanche ability to do stuff like lockdowns is gone.
"Federal Agencies" do not pass legislation. This type of activity is intended for the people to decide through our representatives in Congress. If our nation feels that an issue warrants federal regulation, the PEOPLE need to decide, not 'experts' at three letter agencies. Our government has become too large, with too much power, and we need to get back to limited government with accountability. This is not a partisan issue.
Well said
Bingo.
You need people, technocrats, that know what theyre talking about instead of policies determined by the smoke and mirrors of political bureaucracy. Policy makers and especially the megaphone that speaks to the masses do not understand the technical nuance of very specific issues.
@@polkunus That's the role of advisors, staff, and lobbyist to work with our representatives and legislatures for technical understandings.
Separations of powers are a thing for a reason and alphabet agencies having all three with no accountability to congress was bs.
@@polkunus To have genuine authority in an area the best approach is to bring in "laymen", people who work in that field/industry. Instead our government brings in "experts" provided by lobbyists, NGOs and big corporations and our bureaucrats sit in offices and read papers written by the same "experts" or by people with degrees who have little experience in the field but are receiving kickbacks, grants and paychecks from the same special interests. The politicians get paid by the lobbyists and the bureaucrats retire from .Gov to go work at cushy overpaid jobs for the same companies they used to police. Then people blame anything but the broken, incompetent, corrupt systems and claim that what we need is MORE instead of reform... When was the last time you saw someone in Washington, DC bring in a poor dirty farmer or rancher to ask them what government could do to make their life better (or quit interfering with their productivity)? It doesn't happen because their intent isn't to make things better and once you understand that everything else becomes apparent.
It's about time. This should have happened along time ago. Finally they are giving power back to the people
For profit prisons are licking their chops, after this ruling on the homeless. They can profit from this.
About time the power was returned back to the people.....
They've over stepped their power for for to long and without the best interest of the people...
Power is back with House Reps
and Senators.
REVIEW Voting Records of YOUR
House Representatives & Senators
online in a few minutes BEFORE
you VOTE.
And they wonder why young people aren’t having children 🙄
Because young people have been on social media their entire life and have become nothing but attention whores and narcissists. Everything is "me me me"
Bye to all the 3 letter agencies & defer to the states. 10th amendment style 😂🔥⚔️⚖️🇺🇸
That's not the only one on a long list of vexatious rulings.
The latest ruling on homelessness.
Here's my opinion.
1. **Ignoring Established Precedents**:
- Overturning a lower court's decision that aligns with established interpretations of the Eighth Amendment (prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment) can be seen as ignoring legal precedents set by previous cases.
2. **Disregard for Human Rights**:
- By upholding measures that may be seen as cruel and unusual punishment for homelessness, the decision could be interpreted as disregarding fundamental human rights, which is generally seen as an unreasonable stance in modern jurisprudence.
3. **Appeal to Legal Formalism**:
- Relying heavily on technical legal arguments to justify overturning the lower court's decision, without considering the broader social and humanitarian implications, can be seen as vexatious. This approach prioritizes form over substance.
4. **Selective Interpretation**:
- The decision may involve selectively interpreting laws or the Constitution to fit a specific ideological agenda, rather than applying a consistent legal standard. This selective interpretation can undermine the principle of impartial justice.
5. **Dismissal of Contextual Realities**:
- Failing to consider the socio-economic context of homelessness and the real-world impact of the decision on vulnerable populations can be seen as a sign of vexatious reasoning. A decision that ignores the lived realities of affected individuals lacks compassion and practical wisdom.
6. **Conflict with Moral and Ethical Standards**:
- Upholding what is widely regarded as cruel and unusual punishment contradicts contemporary moral and ethical standards, suggesting the decision is more about exerting ideological control than about fair legal judgment.
7. **Inconsistent Application of Judicial Review**:
- If the Supreme Court majority frequently overturns lower court decisions that protect vulnerable populations, but not other types of cases, it indicates a potentially vexatious pattern of behavior targeting specific outcomes.
8. **Political Motivations**:
- The decision may be perceived as being driven by political motivations rather than impartial legal reasoning. If the justices' political affiliations correlate strongly with their decisions, it raises questions about the objectivity of the ruling.
By identifying these points, we can critically assess the logical foundations (or lack thereof) behind the Supreme Court's right-wing majority decision, illustrating why it might be perceived as vexatious.
This is awesome, no more unilateral "law changes" based on the feelings of those who have been appointed.
Hahahahahaha watching the communist left rage is hilarious!
It is sorta fun to troll them.
Will you laugh when you get a preventable disease due to breathing dirty air or consuming a product that was deregulated because powerful corporate lobbyist influenced judges and politicians?
Oh please. There is no real left anymore in the US.
This takes power from unaccountable bloated agencies and returns it to the people or Congress. how is this a bad thing?
It takes power from the federal government to regulate and sells it to business oligarchs.
@@Rhythmiconswrong. What this decision does is restore the checks and balances that were intended in the formation of our government. Prior to it the executive branch had jurisdiction over agencies that had the ability to be the legislative branch and the judicial branch. By reversing this decision the agencies now only have the power to enforce the law. Congress has to write the laws and the judicial branch has to interpret the laws. It’s separating power and if anything it makes it harder for bureaucrats to corrupt the system. Because they would be required to corrupt all 3 branches and not simply the president or someone at one of these agencies.
@@Rhythmicons So, it takes it away from oligarchs and gives it to different oligarchs. Except the new oligarchs are the ones we voted for to do this job.
Oh noes! What a disaster! Reeeeeee!
It's only bad if you're a corrupt establishment politician.
@@Kahless_the_Unforgettable the real Kahless would understand.
Awesome, it's about time to strip the power from unelected bureaucrats.
Couldn't agree with you more Maria! Thank God the tables are finally turning. So sick of the twisted gestapo left . Nevertheless , I disagree that homeless people should not be allowed to be able to sleep on the street.
Did you even listen to what was said? Omg
Until our manufacturing and infrastructure improvements change for more clean air solutions? We're stuck with what we have? And bigger government puts a big strain on those agendas and policies to make the necessary changes to our energy products to get to that clean air and other cleansing of our essential products?
40 years of agencies regulating American businesses, farmers, small business owners, ordinary citizen. I cannot fathom the amount of money spent and lost due to those regulations. 40 years, almost my entire adult life, of unconstitutional regulations years have affected almost every American. These agencies should have never had this power. The country will survive. The EPA should not control the life of Americans.
Not to mention the ATF turning law abiding citizens into felons overnight and the IRS making new unfair tax rules and STEALING from citizens.
Many of those regulations you hate impact people's health and safety. Without them corporations would still be killing us because they won't regulate themselves. So watch what happens now. Workplace safety? Fuck you. Drug safety? Fuck you. Food safety? Fuck you.
Power is the key word here. I’ve heard you say the word power too much! Narcissists accuse others of what they are doing.
CORPORATIONS,
FREE FROM
REGULATIONS
AND
CONGRESSIONAL
OVERSIGHT
WILL RUN
WILD .
Well if you want to call the absolute solemn law of the land "living, breathing" despite centuries of precedent, then pshaw to mere decades of precedent. At any rate it's not the corporations that are glowing at the removal of agency authority for HEALTH; it's human beings. If anyone doesn't think the agencies forfeited the responsible privilege of that role, pffffffft.
Totally MISLEADING version of what the SCOTUS Ruling does. It simply forces the Congress to MAKE Laws...
Administrators who are NOT Elected have ZERO Authority to simply Make Rules with the Force of Law behind it..
Re: EPA, CDC, BATF etc.
It’s called the 10th amendment.
Perhaps you should read the constitution
50 years ago was my (3rd) third Non-Violent/Victimless DUI ... (Pullover arrests)
All three offenses were VOID OF VICTIM, INCIDENT, ACCIDENT, and DAMAGED PARTY.
After serving (6) years as a front-line Marine during the Iranian crisis (1979), (Before having a wife, children, and grandchildren) returning to civilian life (Honorable Discharge) was difficult...
After 50 years as a prohibited person can the Bruen decision help this 67-year-old Marine regain his gun right for family and home protection?
When DUI arrests have NO victim, NO incident, NO accident, and NO damaged party, the 2nd Amendment "Right/Privilege" should never be "eternally abrogated"!
- USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)
Thank you for your service, sir. And that is absurd. These precendents won't be rolled back by this overturning, but perhaps there can be reversals by courts or lawmakers.
The only problem is that it took 40 years to make this happen. The agencies should never have had that kind of power without Congress.
Bull! Federal agencies have been assuming regulatory powers not granted them by the federal legislature.It's called regulatory" creep".
Agencies fall under congressional control. Not judicial. Judges do not 16:03 administer laws. They interpret when cases are brought in front of them. This will cause court cases to pile up, delaying processing those breaking regulations so that by the time a case gets to the Supreme Court, companies can have made their profits, done their damage, and dissolved with the executives laughing all the way to the bank and no recourses for people left in company slime
Times change, and with time so do people; and as people change, the behavior of the individual and society ALSO change... but the forms of govt are kept the same. Why would be a govt needed if not to curve the misbehavior of the constituents of society? Wouldn't this imply that forms of govt should be adaptable in order to cope with the behavioral changes brought on by the change of time? What is worst yet, is that the malice acquired by certain elements of the financial power structure of society, use their MEAN$ to SUBVERT key individuals within the branches of govt, to turn or interpret laws in favor of their own personal and financial interest or those of their share holders.
SO MANY new technology that exist, yet our forms of govt are as archaic and crude as they were back in the Roman times. As traditional values, such as morality, self-restaint, respect, etc., are being debased, what USED TO ONCE deter people, now either means nothing or is being validated by en mass action; meaning that what was once illegal now is being PUSHED to be legalized by the coercion exercised by the influence of those who have something to gain.
We need more drastic deterrents, or those whose behavior the government was intended to regulate will ultimately end up FULLY regulating govt... not for the good of the people, but for the good of themselves.
Well said
Cancer Alley, also known as “Chemical Corridor,” is an 85-mile stretch of land along the Mississippi River between Baton Rouge and New Orleans in Louisiana. It’s home to over 200 petrochemical plants and refineries, accounting for a quarter of the petrochemical production in the United States. Unfortunately, this region has earned its ominous nickname due to serious environmental concerns. Residents in Cancer Alley face disproportionately high rates of cancer, miscarriages, and respiratory ailments. The air pollution caused by these industrial facilities exceeds federal limits of acceptable risk, making it a challenging place to live….
🕊️
40 years under Chevron did nothing to stop it. Corperations are known to hack into the Federal Agancies, get key positions on staff and deregulate anything they need to do things like dump toxic chemicals into rivers, oceans, waste treatment facilities, or directly apply on forests. There were too many vulnerabitlites for the doctrine to work as it was supposed to. We are at liberty to try to get this cleaned up and make them stop polluting. It could go the other way also. We do have to go to work now.
Only four decades we were able to catch this"Chevron" thing rather quickly for a Republic 😊
Congress and congress only, makes law. The judicial branch is the body who tries the law. That's it! Democracy does not allow for agencies to run the country.
thank you!
We are not a democracy.
We are not a democracy. We are a constitutional representative republic.
@@hisnameisiam808 Cool story bro. Can you please explain how that changes anything he said? If you switch out the word "Democracy", and replace it with "Republic", does any other fact change?
Basically, can you say something relevant?
True!
The court is upholding the constitution. Agencies never should have had power to make policy. That's congress's domain. Agencies are the enforcement, not the policy makers.
The 4th Branch of Government
just got it’s death sentence.
The biased justice's need to go back to law 101 for a refresher class. They are so wrong in their interpretation of the constitution. Too bad those false headlines about Thomas, Alito and others quitting need to be ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY TRUE!!!!!
Since the Congress recognized the Lobbyist more than the American people the last hope is the court God bless America.
Power grab? For nearly 200 years the federal courts interpreted federal statutes. How is returning to that practice a power grab?
Great decision from the Supreme Court. Agencies and bureaucrats should not be making the laws. We saw how well that went during Covid. Things got tyrannical pretty quickly.
Okay. I already did consumer' action after reading. My second time. My first passed for bank fees, help.
Its just formalize the executive branch role based on the constitution.
Only news if you have not read it.
Technically we don't vote for the president of the United States either
Gerrymandering is made to fool us into compliance . There is an elite voting council to implement the facade that the people have any say about their presidential vote at all. The council voted for both Trump *and* Biden.
Government bureaucrats should not be making laws regulations that affect everyday citizens and make our lives miserable. Good for the court
Don't kill babies
❤❤❤
I had an abortion and it was the best decision of my life
All pregnancies terminate around 9 months. It's called birth. No one's killing a birthed baby. That's in China.
Pro Choice means the PATIENT makes the medical decisions not the government regardless as to which way they choose. Wanted pregnancies go wrong and options are needed. Terminal birth defects, fetus attached inside the falopian tube instead of the uterus, miscarriages that won't purge, stillbirths, preeclampsia, sepsis, etc can cause death / loss of reproductive organs. That's why doctors need to be able to do their jobs. The BIBLE states life begins when a baby takes its first breath.
Just to clarify because the explanation in this video was confusing:
The third most prevalent greenhouse gas is nitrous oxide (n2o), which is also laughing gas.
According to The New Republic, the gases for that specific EPA initiative, the Good Neighbor Plan, used a broader category, nitrogen oxides.
Donald J. Trump also Signed an Executive Order to Restore the Constitutional Republic and Donald J. Trump Signed Executive Order 13818 declaring Child and Human Trafficking to be International Crimes. can we talk about That ??? !
We might have to form our own news agency to get that on air.
The job of the Supreme Court is not to make laws but to interpret them to the letter of the law
Is it federal agencies job to interpret the law? Kind of a weird argument.
That's exactly what they did!
The constitution says Congress makes law, not unnamed, faceless unelected bureaucrats.
@@tonymccoy5032Only a libtard would refer to the Supreme Court as an agency.
Channel name should be "Communism Now".
Whats wrong with communism
@polkunus It fails every time it's tried. It is antithetical to individual rights and religion. The Party, once dominant, is incapable of tolerating any opposition or resistance. It is counter revolutionary against the American Revolution away from the English Monarchy. The mythical Workers Paradise is never achieved. Authoritarian oligarchies are formed instead. It doesn't account for the weakness of human nature to be corrupted by power, small or large scale.
SCOTUS has some judges who are uneducated on matters they rule on as well as not transparent with their gift receipts.
The Court took power away from buricrates.
Wow now they have to make laws.
Absolutely wonderful no agency should be allowed to make up laws like medical mandates or whatever political topics is being pushed at the moment good for the supreme court for standing up for what’s right. Jeopardizing clean air and clean water such lies and propaganda this is a very good thing ✌️
If we needed clean air and water policies, I'm sure the elected politicians at the state and federal level would make laws for it. Since it is after all, their job to make laws as law makers
@@DoSe420
Wow, good thing special interest don't bribed Congress people.😂
Iman the people for this decision are just a bunch of privileged rich types.
Wow you definitely lost your shit when it was merely suggested to wear a mask during a plague.
@@dalekrenegade2596 plague that’s hilarious
@@DoSe420 then make new laws you don’t get to interpret existing laws
So I've been unhoused several times in my life. I know there's every possibility I could wing up homeless again. My question is should I just head straight to jail next time, thanks.
This is not one of Democracy Now's better posts.
Its definitely the most honest they've been. Shows their true feelings.
None of them are. These people are shiite.
😭 liberal tears.
Oh these people are not liberals, they are leftists, Marxists, and call the Stasi on you Communists.
These agencies that are suppose to make sure people have safe food drinking water etc. Don't so what's the difference. The only difference is now the big corporations don't have to pay as many people off.
Besides being unhoused, what if someone is narcoleptic and they fall asleep?
Chevron SHOULD have been gone along time ago
Should never have been in the first place
power grab? or returning power back to the people
Explain how it's not a power grab plz
@@themcguy1 bureaucrats have no business making laws that affect the freedom of Americans that's not how the government supposed to work.
@themcguy1 it returns the power seized by the federal government to the states, which are much more accountable to the people.
@themcguy1 Because it simply takes away the power for these agencies to create sub agencies to enforce stuff illegally. Now they have to go through congress like they legally have to.
How exactly does this give power to the people? People elect judges?
If you weep for the regulatory agencies, you're missing the point of living in a constitutional society.
Cool - the congresscritters will actually have to take stances and vote on regulations - they’ll no longer be able to deny accountability by saying "the agencies regulate those things - my hands are tied and I can’t do anything. It’s not MY fault!"
Marx, Lenin, et al would be proud of this "unbiased" reporting!
What kind of reporting is biased and what does this have to do with marx or lenin
Constitutional republic get it straight
That's just semantics! Got it straight?
🍌 republic
Our republic is a representative democracy. Get it straight.
Definitely not Federalist.
@@Rhythmicons And representatives in said constitutional republic are elected through a democratic process. Got it.
This decision has confirmed that the majority on this court doesn't care at all about the health and wellbeing of our citizens
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
We're all fucked if they don't expand the Supreme Court.
Because somebody told you that you should be mad at them?
We the people....not......we the government
ture .
@@bluzmahn66 WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT.
@@heidiaeschlimann2244 Ture? 😂
So, do you want good government? Or corrupt government?
How about LESS government
If you're going to talk about Clarence Thomas and his wife be sure you put your facts and not hearsay down in the area where we can click on these links and research for ourselves.. we don't go by hearsay
Since when is over turning bad law a bad thing, or do some of the people here think Plessy V Ferguson should still be law.
Good Lord, who are these tree huggers, love our SC. They are GREAT !!
The SC is made up of detached boomers
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Regulatory overreach returned to the people's representatives. Sounds like "democracy" to me
if you think congress in any way represents or reflects the interest of the people, you're delusional. This hands power over towards people who represent corporate interest who have neither the interest or expertise to make sound regulations.
@@HM-rz8nv and a regulatory elite does? That is a joke. Is it perfect, no. But that is the way it is set up, congress makes law, not the executive branch
Oh my gosh! That is not only going to create major bottle neck back up to already overloaded court system but will cost us all so much monetarily and environmentally
Crock of poop, but you have to expect that from them
They bring these 2 clowns but not a single person who may be supportive of the ruling? The courts should be the ones who rule on matter of law and not faceless bureaucrats
Government shouldn't be regulating pubic health as a way to receive it. You want that? Move to Cuba.
Your pubic hair is showing
I definitely don't want my pubic health regulated 😂
@@thruntroll2983 You think it is? How many gerbils lined up for the covid shot? That's regulated?
@@seandoherty1507 You're very special, aren't you
@@seandoherty1507 You typo'd public to pubic, as in pubic hair in case you don't know what pubic means.
We should NEVER allow unelected people to create 'laws' and/or 'regulations' that can't be held accountable. We fought a civil war to ensure the citizens of our Republic are represented by those we elected and NOT some no name people working behind closed doors.
Our court has returned the power back to the people and ensured that the 3 parts of our government are to work together as co-equal members working for the benefit of the citizens and NOT themselves
What are you smoking??? Billionaires are pulling the strings at ALL LEVELS of government including the 50 states. It's not just limited to the federal government. And those billionaires include foreigners.
Political influence not science made 90% of the rulings just like the jab.
Regarding the delay on Jan 6 matters… Captain Jack took his time with the case about the incident from Jan 2020… maybe because they want to make sure it messes with the election.
No doubt about it
People actually believe that wasn't planned.... 😂 We in trouble
You know nothing about our Constitution!
Ignorant folks. Suck
A 4th grader can tell you that the executive branch's job is to enforce the law, we have other branches to interpret and create new law. SCOTUS has actually been fixing up some of this basic branch of government stuff recently and it is so refreshing!! Let's get some of that 4th grade government class now for the the "Democracy Now!" folks! 😂