The attention to detail in the TSC version is so good... it's almost laughable seeing the TSW effort. Sure there are sprinkles of features that feel superior in TSW e.g. lighting, PIS. But you can see every hand-made asset in the JT version. Think this video also highlights just how bad TSWs assets are. Just walls of over-imposing trees everywhere, and the same bridge assets used. Trackside clutter is non-existant in comparison.
It's important to note that 2 different Devs made these routes so quality will differ partly because of the Dev not the game itself. Nether of witch was made by dovetail games so there being less quality on TSW over TSC is not there fault apart from the fact Just Trains did a better job on TSC than Skyhook on TSW. The good news is that Just Trains are now making a route for TSW so I look forward to seeing what they can do in TSW as there TSC stuff is really good.
Ultimately, for me, it comes down to the fact that something is stopping TSW routes being what they should be. We were told they were shorter because they were massively more detailed. We all know that is no longer true, nothing like true. It is going to be really telling to see what JT and ATS can pull off. It will either indicate that Skyhook, Rivet and DTG are underperforming or that there is a fundamental problem with developing routes in TSW3 that is probably unsurmountable. In year 7 of TSW’s existence it should be better than this. I think the first ATS & JT routes will be a watershed moment for the game.
To be fair this is Skyhook first British route and their first time with any of our systems, I think it was a good first effort. why not compare routes like Birmingham cross city, both made by DTG?
How can you watch that and think the TSW one is a good first effort? They haven't even bothered to add lineside grass along most stretches. It's such a lazy job with no eye for detail whatsoever.
For a number of reasons, but mainly because there are very clear issues with TSW3. This isn’t just about Skyhook, it’s about the tools they’re having to develop with.
@@thetrainspotter7 its about doing a fair comparison as both bits of content here is made by different Devs, Skyhook and Just Trains. where as what Morgan said it would be a more fair comparison if the content was both made by the same Dev, Birmingham cross city, that are both made by DTG on TSC and TSW.
I’m not trying to do a fair comparison as such. I’m doing a comparison of both games, made by the same developer (DTG) and showing them in the best light possible. The fact that Skyhooks route building isn’t up to scratch is the point of the video. Why that is is also the question. I doubt it’s entirely down to skill (although the JT guys are excellent), so I suspect it’s partly down to time pressure and partly down to the editor they’re having to use. Assuming that’s the case the I think TSW has a problem. The other point of the video was to demonstrate that much as some people wish it to be the case, TSC is not only alive and kicking but is better in many regards than TSW. That’s not how it should be.
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Performance Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Eh5hItD4Mr0/mqdefault.jpg)
I much prefer TSC for graphics. It just looks more realistic and I guess that is why TSW is more 'cinematic'
In no world does tsc look better than tsw, i have a 10000 dollar pc and it runs both amazing, i cant distiguish tsw from real life sometimes.
This is why TSC will always win for details and more Ai trains selections because TSW doesn't have those at all.
Depends on the route and stock available for layering tbh
Yes I prefer TSC as they put more details like AI Trains. More realistic and feel more alive.
The attention to detail in the TSC version is so good... it's almost laughable seeing the TSW effort. Sure there are sprinkles of features that feel superior in TSW e.g. lighting, PIS. But you can see every hand-made asset in the JT version. Think this video also highlights just how bad TSWs assets are. Just walls of over-imposing trees everywhere, and the same bridge assets used. Trackside clutter is non-existant in comparison.
Finally you're back, keep the videos coming. Thanks also for the comparison, we can see the hard work of SkyHook Games 😂
Fantastic video wow how different the 2 routes are 😮
It's important to note that 2 different Devs made these routes so quality will differ partly because of the Dev not the game itself. Nether of witch was made by dovetail games so there being less quality on TSW over TSC is not there fault apart from the fact Just Trains did a better job on TSC than Skyhook on TSW. The good news is that Just Trains are now making a route for TSW so I look forward to seeing what they can do in TSW as there TSC stuff is really good.
Ultimately, for me, it comes down to the fact that something is stopping TSW routes being what they should be. We were told they were shorter because they were massively more detailed. We all know that is no longer true, nothing like true. It is going to be really telling to see what JT and ATS can pull off. It will either indicate that Skyhook, Rivet and DTG are underperforming or that there is a fundamental problem with developing routes in TSW3 that is probably unsurmountable. In year 7 of TSW’s existence it should be better than this. I think the first ATS & JT routes will be a watershed moment for the game.
Damn Tsw has literally no Trackside clutter
To be fair this is Skyhook first British route and their first time with any of our systems, I think it was a good first effort. why not compare routes like Birmingham cross city, both made by DTG?
How can you watch that and think the TSW one is a good first effort? They haven't even bothered to add lineside grass along most stretches. It's such a lazy job with no eye for detail whatsoever.
For a number of reasons, but mainly because there are very clear issues with TSW3. This isn’t just about Skyhook, it’s about the tools they’re having to develop with.
@@thetrainspotter7 its about doing a fair comparison as both bits of content here is made by different Devs, Skyhook and Just Trains. where as what Morgan said it would be a more fair comparison if the content was both made by the same Dev, Birmingham cross city, that are both made by DTG on TSC and TSW.
I’m not trying to do a fair comparison as such. I’m doing a comparison of both games, made by the same developer (DTG) and showing them in the best light possible. The fact that Skyhooks route building isn’t up to scratch is the point of the video. Why that is is also the question. I doubt it’s entirely down to skill (although the JT guys are excellent), so I suspect it’s partly down to time pressure and partly down to the editor they’re having to use. Assuming that’s the case the I think TSW has a problem. The other point of the video was to demonstrate that much as some people wish it to be the case, TSC is not only alive and kicking but is better in many regards than TSW. That’s not how it should be.
I will consider doing a BCC comparison too. Trust me, it won’t end well for TSW either.
that best TSC than TSW
TSW looks way better. The light is very realistic. TSC is too clean.
Tsw looks cleaner than tsc
What are your specs if you don’t mind me asking?
No probs at all!
5800x3D
3090 FTW3
32GB DDR4 3200mhz
X-570F Gaming Motherboard
SSD