The end part is the range of the missiles. To get an idea the time-frame it would take for the missiles to cover their range, would be to divide the max speed by the range. Take the LGM-30G shown as an example, it has a velocity of 28,200km/h divided by the 14,000km = 121 minutes. It's not an entirely accurate time-frame, but you get the idea. Also, some missiles have multiple stages to gain altitude or velocity in order to reach their target. It's the same thing that rockets do. The space shuttle for example, used to drop the white boosters on the sides, then the big orange tank before heading on to orbit.
In regard to your thinking at the beginning that it would not be the case, all the fastest missiles in this presentation are the big ones...like the intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). They are so fast because they travel out into space at speeds that are just a bit too slow for them to enter orbit so that their trajectory brings them back down thousands of miles away to deliver their nuke payload. Also, the speed of the missile has no impact at the end of its flight because the only thing that comes back down are the warheads themselves...the rest of the missile is jettisoned in flight or burns up as it re enters the Earth's atmosphere. And the big flaw in this video is that it gives the impression that all these missiles can fly fast at the altitude that is shown in the video, but that is not true. Most of these missiles have to be at very high altitude to fly at max speed, and all the fastest missiles are ballistic missiles that only achieve their highest speed when they are literally in space. The fact that the video does not show the real flight profiles of any of these missiles makes the video almost useless except for the data blocks with details about each missile. The main reason that so many of these missiles have multiple stages that drop off and leave only a relatively small very fast vehicle is because most of the rocket is really just fuel tanks to carry all the propellant that is needed to get the actual vehicle high enough up in the atmosphere or even into space so that it can achieve its actual top speed. It is part of the science of rocketry and the fact that the heavier the missile to be launched is, the more fuel it will need to carry to get off the ground, but it also has to lift the weight AND volume of its own fuel that it is burning. The vast majority of countries do not have any missiles like any of these...they are incredibly expensive to develop, test and deploy...and there is pretty much no point to spending that money unless you have nukes to throw or satellites that you want to launch into space. Only the nuclear capable nations have heavily invested in very large/very fast missiles like these, with only a very few exceptions like Japan and Germany and a very few others.
This video does a bad job explaining most of these. All the missiles you were having problems understanding, the parts breaking off, its because those missiles go into orbit first. Then come down from orbit. Orbital speed is around 27000kph. They are all travelling around that speed. The animation showing them flying across the ground like that is extremely unrealistic. Nothing we can currently build can go that fast through the thick part of the lower atmosphere, not for long anyway. Thats part of why they fly out of the atmosphere. But even the long range ATACMS flies to a height of about 60 miles. And it was one of the slowest missiles on this. Many missiles go up first and come down towards the target in a glide, or a semi powered descent. Its only really cruise missiles that hug the ground like you see in the video.
Bro India developed its own technology nobody helps us ok and this kind of technology nobody share with any other countries I think you are not literate that much that's why you talking that
1st 🇷🇺 Mach 27
2nd 🇨🇳 Mach 26
3rd 🇫🇷 Mach 25
4th 🇮🇳 Mach 25
5th 🇺🇸 Mach 24
India is faster than usa damn india is so strong man
The end part is the range of the missiles. To get an idea the time-frame it would take for the missiles to cover their range, would be to divide the max speed by the range. Take the LGM-30G shown as an example, it has a velocity of 28,200km/h divided by the 14,000km = 121 minutes. It's not an entirely accurate time-frame, but you get the idea.
Also, some missiles have multiple stages to gain altitude or velocity in order to reach their target. It's the same thing that rockets do. The space shuttle for example, used to drop the white boosters on the sides, then the big orange tank before heading on to orbit.
well my friend physics is same all over the earth and math too so, there are not many different ways to make missiles. so that's why they look same.
18:14 Oh Jesus man.... it is show to you the f...g range of the missiles... that's why they start from the same place.... ughhhhhh......
The earth rotate around 1,000 mph 3:38
In regard to your thinking at the beginning that it would not be the case, all the fastest missiles in this presentation are the big ones...like the intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). They are so fast because they travel out into space at speeds that are just a bit too slow for them to enter orbit so that their trajectory brings them back down thousands of miles away to deliver their nuke payload. Also, the speed of the missile has no impact at the end of its flight because the only thing that comes back down are the warheads themselves...the rest of the missile is jettisoned in flight or burns up as it re enters the Earth's atmosphere.
And the big flaw in this video is that it gives the impression that all these missiles can fly fast at the altitude that is shown in the video, but that is not true. Most of these missiles have to be at very high altitude to fly at max speed, and all the fastest missiles are ballistic missiles that only achieve their highest speed when they are literally in space. The fact that the video does not show the real flight profiles of any of these missiles makes the video almost useless except for the data blocks with details about each missile.
The main reason that so many of these missiles have multiple stages that drop off and leave only a relatively small very fast vehicle is because most of the rocket is really just fuel tanks to carry all the propellant that is needed to get the actual vehicle high enough up in the atmosphere or even into space so that it can achieve its actual top speed. It is part of the science of rocketry and the fact that the heavier the missile to be launched is, the more fuel it will need to carry to get off the ground, but it also has to lift the weight AND volume of its own fuel that it is burning.
The vast majority of countries do not have any missiles like any of these...they are incredibly expensive to develop, test and deploy...and there is pretty much no point to spending that money unless you have nukes to throw or satellites that you want to launch into space. Only the nuclear capable nations have heavily invested in very large/very fast missiles like these, with only a very few exceptions like Japan and Germany and a very few others.
This video does a bad job explaining most of these. All the missiles you were having problems understanding, the parts breaking off, its because those missiles go into orbit first. Then come down from orbit. Orbital speed is around 27000kph. They are all travelling around that speed. The animation showing them flying across the ground like that is extremely unrealistic. Nothing we can currently build can go that fast through the thick part of the lower atmosphere, not for long anyway.
Thats part of why they fly out of the atmosphere. But even the long range ATACMS flies to a height of about 60 miles. And it was one of the slowest missiles on this. Many missiles go up first and come down towards the target in a glide, or a semi powered descent. Its only really cruise missiles that hug the ground like you see in the video.
is education banned in america ?/
DENSE.
Bro India developed its own technology nobody helps us ok and this kind of technology nobody share with any other countries I think you are not literate that much that's why you talking that