You cant imagine how happy i am to find a small channel talking about relatively deep ideas that doesnt appear to be ai generated slop being read by a guy who genuinely has no idea what hes talking about.
ai generated slop is read by an ai bot. I watched a video on making money producing ai generated videos, it really opened my eyes to stock footage, etc-- tho they are getting harder to tell apart. Some use ai to imitate David Attenborough's voice, and animal video content is easier to fake.(and animal video viewers are way less discerning than people who watch this type of content)
I disagree that we are lucky to find ourselves in a universe that allows for us to exist. That's not luck, that's just reality. It would be lucky or perhaps even impossible if we found ourselves in a universe that doesn't allow for life as we know it to exist.
General Relativity predicts dilation wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, not singularities. Dark matter is dilated mass. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.
In Penrose's CCC theory, it is possible for an advanced civilization to send information from the end of one universe to the begining of the next. If this is true, then the light that created this universe would have contained information from an uncountable number of previous universes. This could be responsible for the fine tuning.
Hmm, interesting. I still think finetuning is a result of survivorship bias. We can only exist in a universe where the values are just right, and thereby that's the universe we exist in and while that probability is next to zero, if there is a multiverse of 10^500 "universes", it's also almost a certainty...well, I mean, we're here, so it is a certainty. Lol Or if you prefer, God.
I don’t really understand how probability comes into the picture. Why is it improbable for a constant to be small? Was it even possible for things to turn out differently, isn’t the universe deterministic on those scales🤨
I think these have an afterglow similar to GRBs. Afterglow is a contradiction to Relativity (waves arrive in order of wavelength with radio last), and if it were realized in the year 1900, Relativity would not be here today. The paradigm is set now and will not be questioned.
@25:15, I feel that "very quickly" should be put with a very large asterisk! It took nearly 379,000 years for the first hydrogen to appear in the universe. On a galactic scale yes. it was a blip on a human scale it was many life times.
No, they already have. My explanation is, an average IQ of only 100 is not enough. Many of us really think very very very slow and not much. It's a sad fact. We are not interested, we have no idea about the universe. We don't need it, get real.
What if Quantum Entangled particles are the same particle... a particle that exists in a higher dimension and the particles we see are projections onto our reality. If one is interacted with then you are interacting with the higher dimensional particle and thus the other projection changes too...
sometimes i wonder about the "information" cant travel faster then light part lets say you have a endless train that's running with light speed along tracks, would have the tracks on cogs that then rotate with light speed. while in the endless train you have a conveyor belt rotating with light speed, delivering a letter towards the front of the train... how would you not be able to have information travel faster then light? (i know its weird but you get what i'm saying)
You wouldn't be able to have physical objects move at lightspeed at all since any mass would result in infinite energy/need infinite energy to accelerate to lightspeed. And once we start getting int relativistic speeds like this Newton's equations stop being accurate, and stuff like 0.9c+0.9c≠1.8c are a result of spacetime dialation iirc. There is a... mi uyephysics I think? Video that explains how that specific phenomenon works. Also, FTL information would break causality (something could be caused by an event that has yet to happen)
@@zacarecobain2864 true the idea of you is a primal hunt so you want it to be viewed as big as that is the hunt/item you feel you bringing to the table As it's attached to you It is your hunt
It would help explain things better if the speed of light was referred to as the speed of causality instead. Explain what that means and then talk about photons travelling at different speeds. Talking about light travelling at different speeds of light can lose someone
Thank you for setting the records straight again. Asrtogolgy gets a bad wrap because what most of us hear and see is 10 years old. My apologies if I complain too much.
We have endless enigmas about so many things on our planet that have never adhered to long enough for some serious results. And even more of the same out there. Ever wonder why !? Simple reason being religious disturbances ?
While I’m absolutely horrible at math, I understand that math is able to explain stuff that’s beyond my comprehension; but in simple terms, how exactly we are able to know about all of this? I’m not asking for someone to breakdown this entire video, but I’ve always wondered how we are able to decipher all of this information when observing the universe through telescopes.
After reading The Three Body Problem series, I can’t help but wonder if these explosions are caused by a civilization with god-like technology either wiping out intelligent life that they deem threatening, or performing the galactic equivalent of civil engineering.
Yeah, I have for sure seen this used by one of the many seemingly AI-generated channels that YT has been recommending me lately for some reason. Most of those are garbage, so I'm glad I found this guy who seems legit!
Biggest mystery in the universe is why anything EXISTS. It doesn't matter if it 's rings, or particles, fields, forces, dimensions, whatever, it doesn't matter if things transform, expand, decay, cancel each anti- opposite that exists for it, etc., the origin of everything that came after was already there. From what did it come to be? Why was it already there to begin with? If _time_ as we know it only counts from the Big Bang on as the universe expanded, then what was there "before" that moment, if you cannot even use time anymore as a reference?
The simplest answer seems that spacetime has no beginning. The problem with a beginning is before. There is nothing before, nothing by which to measure where that beginning is. And it doesn’t help much if there’s an external reference frame for spacetime, like a creator or higher reality, since that leads to an infinite number of external reference frames. Bloody difficult though visualising something having no beginning.
Here's one theory Since dark matter is inverted, neutrons and protons are whizzing around electron nucleus so the logic implies that photons of the dark matter are some electrons in our universe. Since matter and antimatter are created after the big bang the probability of those being coupled on a quantum level is quite high.
What if one species got one of our messages while on a space mission, FTL communicated our coordinates back home (because our dumbasses gave em out) and now all the species across the univers out there with FTL communication sharing our coords. Their all taking pictures of us
skito posting but im like this has to be space travel and quick space travel , its like were looking at someone search history (never look at another mans portal gun history) LMFAO
Astrophysics is the only field in science where you can say “well our mathematical models don’t actually work unless we factor in this energy/matter that we can’t see or observe in any way or even prove exists, but if you factor that stuff in then our models work perfectly!” So no, I do not like nor adhere to the belief of “dark matter/energy”. It’s so much easier to believe that we’re wrong about something as opposed to believing that there’s an invisible and unobservable matter/energy that makes up 90 some odd % of the whole universe.
Except we can see dark matter's influence. Do you think that all of these brilliant mathematicians are just pulling shit out of their ass? The models are off in a consistent manner. Besides, it's not like we really know what dark matter/energy are. They're stand-ins for the thing that does throw off our models when we *don't* include them. Just because we can't identify the source of influence, doesn't mean the influence doesn't exist. Gravity didn't just poof into existence when Newton was sitting under a tree.
And yes I do, (answer to your question). I admit, I do not know how to balance a Planck length in an equation, I don't understand sets of infinities, or odds of 10 to the power of 500 to one, or how you can call cosmology science since none of the theories can be tested in the lab or addresses the observer. It is the stuffy religion of materialism and atheism and, well, follow the money.. Let there be light. In the beginning was the Logos. The heavens reveal the Glory of God. These things make just as much sense. I think it's all ones and zeros, positives and negatives, hydrogen and ions, acid and base. And if we keep blowing up the physical universe into smithereens we are going to fill up the hard drive and hasten the crash of the matrix. Just kidding. I don't know but I have an old science degree and I am addicted to thinking about the great attractor, the huge distances and impossible to wrap your head around numbers and Boltzmann's brain. I like the electric universe theory and wonder why it makes institutional science so dang mad when you bring it up. (Are you reacting?)
LF Bot explosions are up to 100 times brighter than supernovae, and their bursts quickly fade within a few days, unlike supernovae, which take weeks or months to dim.
It takes longer to to travel through a wormhole for each additional atom being transported. The longer the wormhole is open, the larger the spacecraft.
Just living in a Universe that is onviously existing due to very unprobable coincidents isn't proof, that every possible alternative is taking place. I find it rather strange, that it's possible to make a living of such esoteric questions. The other thing, that haunts me is, why the double slit experiment are always illustrated with infographics or lasers or explanations how to count a single photon without absorbing it.
34:00 wait what I’m so confused where the idea that it was tuned by a super magical conscious being even comes from in this situation? Doesn’t that just bring up a billion more mysteries. What is this being made out of? How did the being come into existence? How does any of that shit work?
The blue light could just be Cherenkov radiation with a gas cloud as the medium. I'm sure large scale electrical charges build up over time to cause an explosion compressing the clouds with its radioactive elements.
Sorry I'm sure everything he said is true but as a physics-ly impaired person it just sounds like a fairytale or a " just so" story... Lmao idk but it's definitely cool to listen to.
My head hurts…. (That’s a good sign of learning for me) I love these knowledge-headaches! 3 new things I learned from this video, I’m going to have to watch it 20more times
I dont care if others answered to why/how the universe came into being agrees with my own . My ideas do not come from watching science fiction movies or TV shows. I dont thing *Q* created it
It's mind bending if I anthropomorphize the quantum and think of it as a unit which can store information and behave with due regard to same information, and furthermore suppose that before it can utilize its information it has to acquire it first for example through probing or communicating. And the probing process interferes with the probing processes of quanta units of different identity. Entanglement fuses two quanta with different spacetime coordinates, as it were, to one multilocal or multitemporal object which splits apart again when it exchanges information with some non-entangled quantum. (All the while entanglement is not always total but instead more than two quanta can be alltogether partially entangled while all their entanglement adds up to 1 full instance of entanglement.) That's a lot of made up assumptions stemming from common sense which make it look so weird. Yet I'm struggling to picture it without those analogies. I find the probing/stretching-out-its-feelers analogy in particular very intriguing to work with. So he mentions that the quantum may take in consideration all its possible paths and then choose the one that's fastest, or offers the least resistance, i.e. maximizing or minimizing some consequences of whatever kind. I find that thought really, really intruiging. At first, of course, I thought, it's our/physicist's common knowledge that, while the quantum is drawn towards said optimal path, it deviates from it according to the probability function, and if the function has multiple identical values, it chooses one of them at random. But then consider this. What if it's not random. If - like the experiments suggest - when (before its alleged collapse or choice) it goes through all the possible choices with all their consequences, goes trough every single calculation, maybe it doesn't just take into consideration the path from emitter to detector, but in fact ALL its possible word lines from the beginning of its existence to infinity, as it were, if THEN it maybe does really choose the overall, for example, fastest path, which is exactly one... then it might appear as if it randomly chooses to deviate from its optimal path, but in fact it does only now, so as the deviation in some way results in a huge path optimization in the far future or past. Because it knows. Furthermore, because the quantum is connected to the whole visible universe in this way, since on large scales the universe is pretty much homogenous, it's this fact that translates into the smooth probability function, the bell curves, and most notably the perfectly random directions of radioactive emissions etc. A possible prediction would be, if we measure the probability distributions with sufficient precision and resolution, (which might be technically inpossible yet), they should project on for example the mass distribution of our universe or the microwave background. It would be a completely deterministic clockwork (again). I'm quite confident that this is not true, but nevertheless a thrilling scenario. Edit: Oh and it would solve quantum gravity because, while a massive particle is wobbling around with its impulse quantum fluctuations, when it's "stretching out its feelers" into all directions, in direction of curved spacetime cavities there are more possible pathways to explore than in other, flat directions, so it's biased in its "fluctuation choices" towards the cavity but, yeah, probably bullshit.
1:00:30 Light has no experience of time. So what we see as photonic transmission is literally the probability that something that does experience time will interact with it before its predetermined destination. You said it's like pinching the ends of strings to create standing nodes. Because beginning and ending are the same thing relative to the photon, but what does that mean for the wavy part? If time disappears for the photon, that means distance also means nothing as it would need to reach infinite distance if it felt no time. But we see it pass through both time and cross distance. What does this mean? We see the emission of refelcted information striking our input sensors. That means we don't see photons travel. We see what information they have reflected off of, as stimulated signals. Light fills its space because of probability. This means we only see what we are looking at, when we look at it... intriguing. We are looking into pure probability. How does that become? There must be some form of causality that cascades through entanglements. But also that doesn't guarantee locality in all directions, only at the moment of cascading. Which seems to imply some form of quantum Darwinism or retro causation for massless particles. Maybe light doesn't move. Mass moves. Being bounced around and animated through multiple photonic stimulations. We perceive this as light moving through time instead. Causation is, therefore, the speed at which mass interacts due to this larger interaction in the photonic probability cloud. How then could this be mapped back to the concept of spacetime.
Light has to move, the photons literally travel. Otherwise there should be photons everywhere all the time. But there would be 'dark photon' spaces as well in timespace. The photonic speed is not the maximum speed. It is not the probability which determines its causality. Even if there were absolutely no observers, the photons would still be travelling indifferently.
Yes. Or no. Pick one, and sleep on. Or start answering all your questions. Pleaae do it yourself, please do not ask all those todler questions in a public place? Or is everybody here thinking teet for tit, now?
You pretty much got it correct. Our reality is as real as a dream is. All is light and light serves its observer. All light comes from one source, itself. The light itself has been bouncing around for a long time creating a cluster which became conscious of itself and eventually divided itself into conscious beings which were able to MAN-ipulate the light as a mass. "Man" (not male) and reality are a symbiote. We were born together. There is much more light, the world is bright white with it. We only see a portion of it as a frequency or a sequence, Fibonacci, The truth starts with the eye. ALl eyes are round, as well as camera lenses. Fibonacci, from "Y" perspective , is a vortex, or one can even call it a pillar. Like looking into a tunnel, Fibonacci naturally gives us sense of depth perspective as well as time. Fibonacci, from "Z" perspective, is a relatively straight line, like the world around us that individuals can see. It curves rapidly on a graph like the Horizon does to the eye and ends and the repeats itself like the days and night and all of time. The rainbow is proof of this.
Your explanation of the slit experiment is different than the version I heard. I heard that if you look at the beam, it leaves pattern A. Conversely, if you DON'T look at the beam of light, It makes pattern B. The experiment didn't have any beam splitters in the version I heard of. Whats up with that?! I heard it from that bald astrophysicist that's kinda got a big nose. You know who I'm referring to?
at time 13:55 would that movement of two stars be visible to eye and within few seconds. I am asking that because I witnessed such event in the sixties but I am not sure how could it be so visible knowing the limit of speeds and the distance between the two stars.
I think we're early, by a lot. I don't think life is meant to develop as quickly and as early into the universe as it did for us. I would guess by the time the universe is nearing 500+ billion years old, alien life might become more common as more star systems have had the time for the all the dominoes to fall perfectly. I don't think the statistical anomaly is not being able to find life elsewhere, but that we exist at all this early into the universe's life span. Sun-like stars are already dying out as the conditions to create them no longer exist as expansively as they did early on, leaving volatile and dangerous m-dwarfs to dominate much of the trillions of years ahead. We quite literally might've developed within the only window the universe will ever give life to develop. Imagine that, not only were we early, everyone else missed the deadline.
Do I get to be "the next Einstein"? 1:01:42 *"Why is the universe behaving different when looked at **_compared to when not?"_* Philosophy of science is wonderful ... really is. But? probably rule #1 to obey: Words and terms are what brain uses to think. So we need to use them precisely *_and_*_ accurately._ (Not synonyms, note.) Have we "looked at" electrons? how about photons? Do they ever behave differently *when we look at them than **_when we don't?_* You can't just ignore the roll of mechanisms and processes and techniques ... and instruments ... Are you sure "looked at" is the concept you want to follow with this? Maybe even something as crude as *_fiddle with_* would serve better.
lfbots are exhaust from engines capable of moving a spaceship extremely fast. its like regular gasoline engine backfire, trust me, I am a qualified youtube commenter. the Tazmanian hadnt serviced the check engine light.
This could have been an interesting 20-minute video, but instead it's someone talking as slowly as possible for over 2 hours, repeating themselves, going over simple things in depth but skipping explanations of actually complicated stuff. It's as if this is a presentation meant to make people with Alzheimer, fall asleep.
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
You cant imagine how happy i am to find a small channel talking about relatively deep ideas that doesnt appear to be ai generated slop being read by a guy who genuinely has no idea what hes talking about.
Well this is a second channel. Their main channel has like 2 million subs.
Watch Anton Petrov
ai generated slop is read by an ai bot. I watched a video on making money producing ai generated videos, it really opened my eyes to stock footage, etc-- tho they are getting harder to tell apart. Some use ai to imitate David Attenborough's voice, and animal video content is easier to fake.(and animal video viewers are way less discerning than people who watch this type of content)
I agree. It's refreshing.
@@TarezOfficialwas gonna say the exact same thing
Genuinely think this has the best explanation of the double slit experiment I've ever heard.
Every so often the TH-cam algorithm gives me something special and today is one of those days
you're one of my favorite channels. Thank you for the research and tie you put in to do these for us!
As Douglas Adams said, if we ever get to understand the universe, it will immediately disappear and be replaced with something even more improbable.
The Nine Billion Names of God…
Don’t mind the flashes, it’s just ships going into hyperspace to travel the universe
Traffic lights
Please PLEASE let that be TRUE!!!
I disagree that we are lucky to find ourselves in a universe that allows for us to exist. That's not luck, that's just reality. It would be lucky or perhaps even impossible if we found ourselves in a universe that doesn't allow for life as we know it to exist.
But why should the universe even exist at all?
@@DumboSanchezwhy shouldn’t it? Prove that ‘nothing’ exists
And if you win the lottery that becomes reality too, but it also means you were lucky.
Wow that just sounds like you said a non sequitur bit of dumb shxt. How unfortunate
@@DumboSanchez Why it should is irrelevant. The fact is that it does.
General Relativity predicts dilation wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, not singularities. Dark matter is dilated mass. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.
Dude, if you actually Know what dark matter IS- you need to tell the scientists.
In Penrose's CCC theory, it is possible for an advanced civilization to send information from the end of one universe to the begining of the next.
If this is true, then the light that created this universe would have contained information from an uncountable number of previous universes.
This could be responsible for the fine tuning.
Hmm, interesting. I still think finetuning is a result of survivorship bias. We can only exist in a universe where the values are just right, and thereby that's the universe we exist in and while that probability is next to zero, if there is a multiverse of 10^500 "universes", it's also almost a certainty...well, I mean, we're here, so it is a certainty. Lol
Or if you prefer, God.
I don’t really understand how probability comes into the picture. Why is it improbable for a constant to be small? Was it even possible for things to turn out differently, isn’t the universe deterministic on those scales🤨
Duh!!
As someone who lives in this universe I can confirm physics is weird
proof or cap
I live in parallel universe, where verything is a tetrahedron. Every atom, planet, shape.
you live on the earth which is flat you need to do some actual research yourself sheep, it’s not that difficult
Same.
@@hyperturbotechnomikeI don't know why but this comment just gets me. 😂 It's great.
You're awesome! Great topics on this compilations playlist!
I think these have an afterglow similar to GRBs. Afterglow is a contradiction to Relativity (waves arrive in order of wavelength with radio last), and if it were realized in the year 1900, Relativity would not be here today. The paradigm is set now and will not be questioned.
@25:15, I feel that "very quickly" should be put with a very large asterisk! It took nearly 379,000 years for the first hydrogen to appear in the universe.
On a galactic scale yes. it was a blip on a human scale it was many life times.
Scientists should try to figure out why astrum doesn't have 100 million subs yet
No, they already have. My explanation is, an average IQ of only 100 is not enough. Many of us really think very very very slow and not much. It's a sad fact. We are not interested, we have no idea about the universe. We don't need it, get real.
More knowledge and passion than bots :/
Because his titles aren't:
"1 star vs. 1 BILLION STARS"
-- OR --
"I survived 3 days at the singularity of a supermassive blackhole"
Word.
That many people dont not believe in space lol 😂
What if Quantum Entangled particles are the same particle... a particle that exists in a higher dimension and the particles we see are projections onto our reality. If one is interacted with then you are interacting with the higher dimensional particle and thus the other projection changes too...
in all seriousness. this is mind blowing stuff. I love it
sometimes i wonder about the "information" cant travel faster then light part
lets say you have a endless train that's running with light speed along tracks, would have the tracks on cogs that then rotate with light speed. while in the endless train you have a conveyor belt rotating with light speed, delivering a letter towards the front of the train...
how would you not be able to have information travel faster then light?
(i know its weird but you get what i'm saying)
You wouldn't be able to have physical objects move at lightspeed at all since any mass would result in infinite energy/need infinite energy to accelerate to lightspeed. And once we start getting int relativistic speeds like this Newton's equations stop being accurate, and stuff like 0.9c+0.9c≠1.8c are a result of spacetime dialation iirc. There is a... mi uyephysics I think? Video that explains how that specific phenomenon works.
Also, FTL information would break causality (something could be caused by an event that has yet to happen)
Fell asleep to this and hot fuck my dreams were insane and intense. Woke up sweating not knowing if I existed.
i think i'm embarraced
Had that recent was living in a simulation where I can't explain but it was going up pushing infinities on me
You don't🎉
@@zacarecobain2864 true the idea of you is a primal hunt so you want it to be viewed as big as that is the hunt/item you feel you bringing to the table
As it's attached to you
It is your hunt
It would help explain things better if the speed of light was referred to as the speed of causality instead. Explain what that means and then talk about photons travelling at different speeds. Talking about light travelling at different speeds of light can lose someone
such great work as always
Thank you for setting the records straight again. Asrtogolgy gets a bad wrap because what most of us hear and see is 10 years old. My apologies if I complain too much.
goodnight everyone
I absolutely love your content. Thank you.
Definitely seen the thumbnail before. Astrum pushes the limits. Great content
The universe is a battle royale we just in the farming phase
"You are free to believe whichever you find most comforting!" That's not good enough; I want to know the TRUTH.
Gravity is like the magnetic field that comes from the "infinity symbol" as a completed circuit.
We have endless enigmas about so many things on our planet that have never adhered to long enough for some serious results. And even more of the same out there. Ever wonder why !? Simple reason being religious disturbances ?
While I’m absolutely horrible at math, I understand that math is able to explain stuff that’s beyond my comprehension; but in simple terms, how exactly we are able to know about all of this?
I’m not asking for someone to breakdown this entire video, but I’ve always wondered how we are able to decipher all of this information when observing the universe through telescopes.
After reading The Three Body Problem series, I can’t help but wonder if these explosions are caused by a civilization with god-like technology either wiping out intelligent life that they deem threatening, or performing the galactic equivalent of civil engineering.
Was this thumbnail used for a different video? I swear I've seen it before.
Same, it looks extremely familiar.
You're not the only one. Same here. Definitely was used on some other video.
I've seen it too
Yeah, I have for sure seen this used by one of the many seemingly AI-generated channels that YT has been recommending me lately for some reason.
Most of those are garbage, so I'm glad I found this guy who seems legit!
It's extremely similar to the thumbnail for the video "Light Is Weird" on the Astrum channel
We’re watching aliens fight the galactic equivalent of nuclear war in deep space
It's just aliens taking our pic lol
Biggest mystery in the universe is why anything EXISTS. It doesn't matter if it 's rings, or particles, fields, forces, dimensions, whatever, it doesn't matter if things transform, expand, decay, cancel each anti- opposite that exists for it, etc., the origin of everything that came after was already there. From what did it come to be? Why was it already there to begin with? If _time_ as we know it only counts from the Big Bang on as the universe expanded, then what was there "before" that moment, if you cannot even use time anymore as a reference?
The simplest answer seems that spacetime has no beginning. The problem with a beginning is before. There is nothing before, nothing by which to measure where that beginning is. And it doesn’t help much if there’s an external reference frame for spacetime, like a creator or higher reality, since that leads to an infinite number of external reference frames. Bloody difficult though visualising something having no beginning.
This staaa is probably either made of something that burns different or was exploded by an alien weapon. Staaaaaaaaaaz. LOL.
Astrum never commented on the Homelander trial.
Here's one theory
Since dark matter is inverted, neutrons and protons are whizzing around electron nucleus so the logic implies that photons of the dark matter are some electrons in our universe.
Since matter and antimatter are created after the big bang the probability of those being coupled on a quantum level is quite high.
All of this is just wronger than wrong. Back to the drawing board for you.
What if one species got one of our messages while on a space mission, FTL communicated our coordinates back home (because our dumbasses gave em out) and now all the species across the univers out there with FTL communication sharing our coords. Their all taking pictures of us
Those dang Alliens, they are trying to steal those Georgia Goddesses before us Mexicans do!
My Peach Pies!
skito posting but im like this has to be space travel and quick space travel , its like were looking at someone search history (never look at another mans portal gun history) LMFAO
Astrophysics is the only field in science where you can say “well our mathematical models don’t actually work unless we factor in this energy/matter that we can’t see or observe in any way or even prove exists, but if you factor that stuff in then our models work perfectly!” So no, I do not like nor adhere to the belief of “dark matter/energy”. It’s so much easier to believe that we’re wrong about something as opposed to believing that there’s an invisible and unobservable matter/energy that makes up 90 some odd % of the whole universe.
Plus ultimated multiverses unproven
Except we can see dark matter's influence. Do you think that all of these brilliant mathematicians are just pulling shit out of their ass? The models are off in a consistent manner. Besides, it's not like we really know what dark matter/energy are. They're stand-ins for the thing that does throw off our models when we *don't* include them.
Just because we can't identify the source of influence, doesn't mean the influence doesn't exist. Gravity didn't just poof into existence when Newton was sitting under a tree.
Patch up the BBT with inflation theory on one end and dark matter on the other .
And yes I do, (answer to your question). I admit, I do not know how to balance a Planck length in an equation, I don't understand sets of infinities, or odds of 10 to the power of 500 to one, or how you can call cosmology science since none of the theories can be tested in the lab or addresses the observer. It is the stuffy religion of materialism and atheism and, well, follow the money..
Let there be light. In the beginning was the Logos. The heavens reveal the Glory of God. These things make just as much sense.
I think it's all ones and zeros, positives and negatives, hydrogen and ions, acid and base. And if we keep blowing up the physical universe into smithereens we are going to fill up the hard drive and hasten the crash of the matrix. Just kidding. I don't know but I have an old science degree and I am addicted to thinking about the great attractor, the huge distances and impossible to wrap your head around numbers and Boltzmann's brain.
I like the electric universe theory and wonder why it makes institutional science so dang mad when you bring it up. (Are you reacting?)
You know we done the same for uranus or pluto before we found it so this is normal
such great work
Kill the sound track!!!
LF Bot explosions are up to 100 times brighter than supernovae, and their bursts quickly fade within a few days, unlike supernovae, which take weeks or months to dim.
Yes, time is weird, too. That is another video.
That sounds pretty good I'll have one of those
I immediately think of 3 Body Problem
If I find solutions for any of these, where do I publish my findings?
Actually a multiverse would require even more fine tuning than a single universe.
Thanks!
Super Symmetry was born when Atoms formed.
Positions?
Superposition
My God, would they kill everything in that galaxy?
It takes longer to to travel through a wormhole for each additional atom being transported. The longer the wormhole is open, the larger the spacecraft.
Anyone else feel like there should’ve been another “again” at 1:11?
No
Yes
Come again?
@@dkmorris713 no
I thought the Universe explained it to you already! It can do what ever the "Big Bang" It wants!
Should try just one detector on one slit,the other slit would be detected by default🤔
NASA should try to reflect the LFBot back towards it in case it’s some cosmic search party from a galaxy too distant to study
In a dark forest, that's the last thing you'd want to do
@@omgahandleloltrial and error
@@omgahandlelol I say go for it
Magnetic fields don't push the magnet pushes. It is an important distinction.
Just living in a Universe that is onviously existing due to very unprobable coincidents isn't proof, that every possible alternative is taking place. I find it rather strange, that it's possible to make a living of such esoteric questions. The other thing, that haunts me is, why the double slit experiment are always illustrated with infographics or lasers or explanations how to count a single photon without absorbing it.
34:00 wait what I’m so confused where the idea that it was tuned by a super magical conscious being even comes from in this situation? Doesn’t that just bring up a billion more mysteries. What is this being made out of? How did the being come into existence? How does any of that shit work?
Oh noooo.. I’m just realizing he keeps bringing up a magic deity as a equally reasonable theory to things we don’t 100% know :(
Oh that, nahhh don't worry about that it's just Broly wiping out star quadrants! He doesn't know where we're at...yet.
The blue light could just be Cherenkov radiation with a gas cloud as the medium. I'm sure large scale electrical charges build up over time to cause an explosion compressing the clouds with its radioactive elements.
Energy weapons from intergalactic battles
Thanks
38:50 i like how they added a human into this picture on top of the leaf.. so , like... we get it, it's us :)
Great.... Space lightning...... Something else to be paranoid about
30:04 history channel taught me it has to be 👽
only the first 20 minutes is about this new phenomenon!
AAAAARRRGGHHH MY BRAIN!
If you could somehow turn the entire universe upsidedown, you would be able to see that it says on the bottom "Made in China."
Give me a case of beers and an oz of bud and I can crack all these problems on a weekend
You have a very nice soothing voice. What nationality are you, just curious?
His name sounds very irish
I think ElfBot sounds better
Theres somthing so familiar about quantum entanglement too
In tandem with many others I figured out the pioneer acceleration anomaly.
That might be a few million people but hey.
I don't believe that we are extremely fortunate because of cause and effect. Evolution is the result of Causality.
"I see your eight states of matter and raise you....thirteen.(Mwuahahahaha!)"
I may be missing something.. but why couldn't light be made up of particles that travel like waves of particles?
it's relatively general, that general relativity is relative, generally...
Static Energy when the Universe was just a infinitesimal cloud of dust.
Sorry I'm sure everything he said is true but as a physics-ly impaired person it just sounds like a fairytale or a " just so" story... Lmao idk but it's definitely cool to listen to.
I don't say it's aliens, but... Trisolarans, maybe? 😂
GREAT
My head hurts…. (That’s a good sign of learning for me) I love these knowledge-headaches!
3 new things I learned from this video, I’m going to have to watch it 20more times
I dont care if others answered to why/how the universe came into being agrees with my own . My ideas do not come from watching science fiction movies or TV shows. I dont thing *Q* created it
It's mind bending if I anthropomorphize the quantum and think of it as a unit which can store information and behave with due regard to same information, and furthermore suppose that before it can utilize its information it has to acquire it first for example through probing or communicating. And the probing process interferes with the probing processes of quanta units of different identity. Entanglement fuses two quanta with different spacetime coordinates, as it were, to one multilocal or multitemporal object which splits apart again when it exchanges information with some non-entangled quantum. (All the while entanglement is not always total but instead more than two quanta can be alltogether partially entangled while all their entanglement adds up to 1 full instance of entanglement.)
That's a lot of made up assumptions stemming from common sense which make it look so weird.
Yet I'm struggling to picture it without those analogies.
I find the probing/stretching-out-its-feelers analogy in particular very intriguing to work with.
So he mentions that the quantum may take in consideration all its possible paths and then choose the one that's fastest, or offers the least resistance, i.e. maximizing or minimizing some consequences of whatever kind. I find that thought really, really intruiging. At first, of course, I thought, it's our/physicist's common knowledge that, while the quantum is drawn towards said optimal path, it deviates from it according to the probability function, and if the function has multiple identical values, it chooses one of them at random.
But then consider this. What if it's not random. If - like the experiments suggest - when (before its alleged collapse or choice) it goes through all the possible choices with all their consequences, goes trough every single calculation, maybe it doesn't just take into consideration the path from emitter to detector, but in fact ALL its possible word lines from the beginning of its existence to infinity, as it were, if THEN it maybe does really choose the overall, for example, fastest path, which is exactly one...
then it might appear as if it randomly chooses to deviate from its optimal path, but in fact it does only now, so as the deviation in some way results in a huge path optimization in the far future or past. Because it knows.
Furthermore, because the quantum is connected to the whole visible universe in this way, since on large scales the universe is pretty much homogenous, it's this fact that translates into the smooth probability function, the bell curves, and most notably the perfectly random directions of radioactive emissions etc.
A possible prediction would be, if we measure the probability distributions with sufficient precision and resolution, (which might be technically inpossible yet), they should project on for example the mass distribution of our universe or the microwave background.
It would be a completely deterministic clockwork (again).
I'm quite confident that this is not true, but nevertheless a thrilling scenario.
Edit: Oh and it would solve quantum gravity because, while a massive particle is wobbling around with its impulse quantum fluctuations, when it's "stretching out its feelers" into all directions, in direction of curved spacetime cavities there are more possible pathways to explore than in other, flat directions, so it's biased in its "fluctuation choices" towards the cavity but, yeah, probably bullshit.
1:00:30 Light has no experience of time. So what we see as photonic transmission is literally the probability that something that does experience time will interact with it before its predetermined destination.
You said it's like pinching the ends of strings to create standing nodes. Because beginning and ending are the same thing relative to the photon, but what does that mean for the wavy part? If time disappears for the photon, that means distance also means nothing as it would need to reach infinite distance if it felt no time. But we see it pass through both time and cross distance. What does this mean?
We see the emission of refelcted information striking our input sensors. That means we don't see photons travel. We see what information they have reflected off of, as stimulated signals. Light fills its space because of probability. This means we only see what we are looking at, when we look at it... intriguing.
We are looking into pure probability. How does that become? There must be some form of causality that cascades through entanglements. But also that doesn't guarantee locality in all directions, only at the moment of cascading. Which seems to imply some form of quantum Darwinism or retro causation for massless particles.
Maybe light doesn't move. Mass moves. Being bounced around and animated through multiple photonic stimulations. We perceive this as light moving through time instead. Causation is, therefore, the speed at which mass interacts due to this larger interaction in the photonic probability cloud. How then could this be mapped back to the concept of spacetime.
Light has to move, the photons literally travel. Otherwise there should be photons everywhere all the time. But there would be 'dark photon' spaces as well in timespace. The photonic speed is not the maximum speed. It is not the probability which determines its causality. Even if there were absolutely no observers, the photons would still be travelling indifferently.
Yes. Or no. Pick one, and sleep on. Or start answering all your questions. Pleaae do it yourself, please do not ask all those todler questions in a public place? Or is everybody here thinking teet for tit, now?
You pretty much got it correct. Our reality is as real as a dream is. All is light and light serves its observer. All light comes from one source, itself. The light itself has been bouncing around for a long time creating a cluster which became conscious of itself and eventually divided itself into conscious beings which were able to MAN-ipulate the light as a mass. "Man" (not male) and reality are a symbiote. We were born together. There is much more light, the world is bright white with it. We only see a portion of it as a frequency or a sequence, Fibonacci, The truth starts with the eye. ALl eyes are round, as well as camera lenses. Fibonacci, from "Y" perspective , is a vortex, or one can even call it a pillar. Like looking into a tunnel, Fibonacci naturally gives us sense of depth perspective as well as time. Fibonacci, from "Z" perspective, is a relatively straight line, like the world around us that individuals can see. It curves rapidly on a graph like the Horizon does to the eye and ends and the repeats itself like the days and night and all of time. The rainbow is proof of this.
Your explanation of the slit experiment is different than the version I heard. I heard that if you look at the beam, it leaves pattern A. Conversely, if you DON'T look at the beam of light, It makes pattern B. The experiment didn't have any beam splitters in the version I heard of. Whats up with that?! I heard it from that bald astrophysicist that's kinda got a big nose. You know who I'm referring to?
11:39 there's a space war going on mate
Hell yeah a new vid from Autism extra just dropped
Lmao. This guy. Pressure.
Sorry that was my bold head reflected by the led light ....
at time 13:55 would that movement of two stars be visible to eye and within few seconds. I am asking that because I witnessed such event in the sixties but I am not sure how could it be so visible knowing the limit of speeds and the distance between the two stars.
I understand your question and have an answer for you: You Cray-Cray! 😁
I think we're early, by a lot. I don't think life is meant to develop as quickly and as early into the universe as it did for us. I would guess by the time the universe is nearing 500+ billion years old, alien life might become more common as more star systems have had the time for the all the dominoes to fall perfectly. I don't think the statistical anomaly is not being able to find life elsewhere, but that we exist at all this early into the universe's life span. Sun-like stars are already dying out as the conditions to create them no longer exist as expansively as they did early on, leaving volatile and dangerous m-dwarfs to dominate much of the trillions of years ahead. We quite literally might've developed within the only window the universe will ever give life to develop. Imagine that, not only were we early, everyone else missed the deadline.
We have no idea about what is going on 😮
the most intelligent comment award goes to you.
Do I get to be "the next Einstein"?
1:01:42
*"Why is the universe behaving different when looked at **_compared to when not?"_*
Philosophy of science is wonderful ... really is. But? probably rule #1 to obey:
Words and terms are what brain uses to think. So we need to use them precisely *_and_*_ accurately._ (Not synonyms, note.)
Have we "looked at" electrons? how about photons?
Do they ever behave differently *when we look at them than **_when we don't?_*
You can't just ignore the roll of mechanisms and processes and techniques ... and instruments ...
Are you sure "looked at" is the concept you want to follow with this?
Maybe even something as crude as *_fiddle with_* would serve better.
lfbots are exhaust from engines capable of moving a spaceship extremely fast. its like regular gasoline engine backfire, trust me, I am a qualified youtube commenter. the Tazmanian hadnt serviced the check engine light.
Universe Static Energy formed mass that started electro magnetic phenomenon which started orbitals atomic and galactic.🤓
Gravity is still out of place though 🙃
The Antiverse is the only since, on multi-verse.
"...no multiverse."
The 22minute signal is definitely coming from the crazy “X-girlfriend !”
“Im😢 , I ❤U!”
Don’t open the message,
DON’T FOLD!
YOU CAN DO IT!!!
😉
Take it for granted, we exist and so does the universe. If not you would not be talking about it. What is bizarre is why.
This could have been an interesting 20-minute video, but instead it's someone talking as slowly as possible for over 2 hours, repeating themselves, going over simple things in depth but skipping explanations of actually complicated stuff. It's as if this is a presentation meant to make people with Alzheimer, fall asleep.
Cowoberated? Sheesh
The captions print cooperated but that is also incorrect, I’m sure what you meant to say was corroborated.
Is there any chance this could be a subsidyne gleure?