Still give these videos likes, even though there is a lot of misinformation in them. First of all fractals are not defined to be self-similar. In general, they are not, yet you make it seem like that's the definition. If you "randomly" generated a fractal, "almost none" would be self-similar. Furthermore, you said that they have fractional dimension, which is false. A shape is a fractal if and only if its Hausdorff dimension is irrational. That can be used as an actual definition in the video.
Simply astounding.
Still give these videos likes, even though there is a lot of misinformation in them.
First of all fractals are not defined to be self-similar. In general, they are not, yet you make it seem like that's the definition. If you "randomly" generated a fractal, "almost none" would be self-similar. Furthermore, you said that they have fractional dimension, which is false. A shape is a fractal if and only if its Hausdorff dimension is irrational. That can be used as an actual definition in the video.
What did you expect a video to grasp fractals in under 11 minutes?
@Nanostarical I expected for the information provided to not be blatently false.
He didn't say it was the definition but that it's a property they (many) have.
now we want a video about irrational numbers or secial sequence like fibonacci
We do have a Fibonacci video in the queue!
Huh, it’s nice to see a fractal video from you
nobody talking about the Kock Snowflake!!?
im somehow interested tp Fractals :)
I'm too drunk to follow. I'll continue tomorrow
Wakey wakey
Ai?
Nope! 100% written and narrated by humans :)
@@ThoughtThrill365proof?
early