I am 100% independent and do not get paid for any of my product reviews. I actually say "no" to companies who want to pay me for reviews because I feel I need to be able to say whatever I want about a product with no pressure or outside influence. That said, every review I do is a slice in time and the more I learn about these technologies the more critical I am becoming. Hell, right in this review I tell you don't buy it and don't trust it because I don't. How much more honest can I be? Do you really think a company would pay me to tell people not to buy their product?? Did you even watch the review to the end?
Thank you for sharing the review on this watch. Keep up the good work 🙂. I am looking forward for more videos. One of these days a better watch will come along.
Blood glucose: This is the problem when you don't pay attention about the units of measure. E610 unit is mmol/L. Glucometer unit is mg/dL (1 mg/dL=0.0555 mmol/L). Then, 6.06 mmol/L = 109 mg/dL. Thus, the difference between E610 and the Glucometer is only 3.9% (Note: to know what is the real value, we must accomplish another kind of tests). Best regards.
These instruments measures the glucose in the cells. A finger prick measures the glucose in the blood. The values will never be the same. The higher the glucose in the blood, the more it will damage the cell. Therefore, one can use the values from this instrument to “gauge” the glucose in the blood.
@DaveTheKayaker , yea, at the end of the day, it’s telling you your blood glucose is too high or too low, because look at the effect it is having on your cell glucose levels. So, ………🤷🏽♂️
Great review sir. On blood glucose seems pretty close to gluvometer readings. But it require more measurements like in Fasting stage, post prandial stage, During high sugar time, during low sugar time n compete it with Gloucometer etc n can u post a comprehensive glucose test video on this e610 watch sir Regards Pradeep
From my perspective, the E610 came with the chest strap for PTT. The E600 did not. Other than that they are essentially the same watch except for button design on the right side of the watch.
That graph of glucose, like the night part and morning, is just equal to other graphs we see here on TH-cam from other watchs - so seems they are all fake, every watch measuring the same!!
Yes that is correct. The graph line is the same but the numbers are different so I'm not sure how the watch is getting the numbers. But it's simulated from fake values without a doubt.
I have one from sacsoding L80.i see it quiet close to acu-check machine I have from last 3 days. Also I see that the readings are higher when I eat and close to the acu -m how the watch knows when I eat? However it was all fine when I exercised untill I ran on treadmill it spiked up 2 units instead of going down.i thought it is due to sweat. I wiped the sweat and checked for another 30 mins and it still was same. So bow I recalibrate it to 6.0 back with acu-check. So something like conditions apply 🤔
My doctor said NO on smart watches and CGM devices. 1) not accurate and not worth the money and to replace often. 2) causing stress and obsession to constantly looking at the reading. Psychologically not good. That's very true, I saw many people at the gyms, swimming pool constantly looking at their device like addicted to it. My doctor order me to use the pricking fingers twice a day and gradually using the monitor once every few days early morning, when my condition improve. I am prediabetic and no need to be too obsessed about it. Unless someone is diabetic and on meds with severe health condition. These companies making stuffs to sell and profit. I stick with the old fashioned way, pricking my fingers!!!! And even that, I started to get addicted to do it twice a day like on drugs 😂 can't wait until the next time pricking my finger
The more I see these devices and how diabetics are looking for answers the more pissed off I get at these companies for essentially making false claims in their advertising. I've learned a great deal about blood glucose and diabetes in the past few months and now feel obligated to tell people not to put any trust or hope in these non invasive watches.
Glucose meter in this smartwatch is totally inaccurate and must not be allowed in this watch. Its dangerous for diabetics. It should be tested on people with high diabetes like 12 to 15 qnd over.
Any knowledgeable diabetic who uses either a CGM or BGM will know these "smart watches" are not accurate when it comes to reliable BG measurements. I am a type 1 diabetic and I will buy a watch like this in order to quickly obtain a reading when I can't physically perform a BG measurement. I used to use a CGM but their cost is extremely prohibitive. Your comment "must not be allowed in this watch. Its dangerous for diabetics" is total nonsense and is counter productive for continuous improvement and research.
Solo quiero aportar diciendo que las mediciones de glicemia con cualquier aparato, son inexactas. Yo he comparado en reiteradas ocasiones las mediciones de mi sensor "free style" con las de un glucómetro convencional y he llegado a comprobar hasta un 40% de diferencias, lo que es una brutalidad. Creo que en este campo de las mediciones de azúcar en sangre, la ciencia está al debe. Supongo que por ahora no hay ningún reloj que acierte con una lectura confiable. I just want to contribute by saying that blood glucose measurements with any device are inaccurate. I have repeatedly compared the measurements of my "free style" sensor with those of a conventional glucometer and I have come to see up to 40% differences, which is brutal. I believe that in this field of blood sugar measurements, science it is not up to date. I guess for now there is no watch that hits with a reliable reading.
Were u paid to review this or are you independent? Sounds paid off.
I am 100% independent and do not get paid for any of my product reviews. I actually say "no" to companies who want to pay me for reviews because I feel I need to be able to say whatever I want about a product with no pressure or outside influence. That said, every review I do is a slice in time and the more I learn about these technologies the more critical I am becoming. Hell, right in this review I tell you don't buy it and don't trust it because I don't. How much more honest can I be? Do you really think a company would pay me to tell people not to buy their product?? Did you even watch the review to the end?
Thank you for sharing the review on this watch. Keep up the good work 🙂.
I am looking forward for more videos. One of these days a better watch will come along.
Blood glucose: This is the problem when you don't pay attention about the units of measure. E610 unit is mmol/L. Glucometer unit is mg/dL (1 mg/dL=0.0555 mmol/L). Then, 6.06 mmol/L = 109 mg/dL. Thus, the difference between E610 and the Glucometer is only 3.9% (Note: to know what is the real value, we must accomplish another kind of tests). Best regards.
Another great review, thanks, I think "Toy" is the correct term indeed. LS
I'm surprised that the 610 has the same screen stuck bug as the 600. I expected it to be fixed.
Thats went i ditched the 600 and got the e420 instead.
These instruments measures the glucose in the cells. A finger prick measures the glucose in the blood. The values will never be the same. The higher the glucose in the blood, the more it will damage the cell. Therefore, one can use the values from this instrument to “gauge” the glucose in the blood.
But they call the measurement "blood glucose."
@DaveTheKayaker , yea, at the end of the day, it’s telling you your blood glucose is too high or too low, because look at the effect it is having on your cell glucose levels. So, ………🤷🏽♂️
Wow and Thanks. I am glad I watched I would have no idea what this watch could do.
Great review sir. On blood glucose seems pretty close to gluvometer readings. But it require more measurements like in Fasting stage, post prandial stage, During high sugar time, during low sugar time n compete it with Gloucometer etc n can u post a comprehensive glucose test video on this e610 watch sir
Regards
Pradeep
I wonder the difference between the E600 and E610. Anybody knows?
From my perspective, the E610 came with the chest strap for PTT. The E600 did not. Other than that they are essentially the same watch except for button design on the right side of the watch.
That graph of glucose, like the night part and morning, is just equal to other graphs we see here on TH-cam from other watchs - so seems they are all fake, every watch measuring the same!!
Yes that is correct. The graph line is the same but the numbers are different so I'm not sure how the watch is getting the numbers. But it's simulated from fake values without a doubt.
@@hammerjoe2008 it's a very advanced modern-like neuro-ai based random numbers generator on integral chip.
I have one from sacsoding L80.i see it quiet close to acu-check machine I have from last 3 days. Also I see that the readings are higher when I eat and close to the acu -m how the watch knows when I eat? However it was all fine when I exercised untill I ran on treadmill it spiked up 2 units instead of going down.i thought it is due to sweat. I wiped the sweat and checked for another 30 mins and it still was same. So bow I recalibrate it to 6.0 back with acu-check. So something like conditions apply 🤔
My doctor said NO on smart watches and CGM devices.
1) not accurate and not worth the money and to replace often.
2) causing stress and obsession to constantly looking at the reading. Psychologically not good. That's very true, I saw many people at the gyms, swimming pool constantly looking at their device like addicted to it.
My doctor order me to use the pricking fingers twice a day and gradually using the monitor once every few days early morning, when my condition improve. I am prediabetic and no need to be too obsessed about it. Unless someone is diabetic and on meds with severe health condition. These companies making stuffs to sell and profit. I stick with the old fashioned way, pricking my fingers!!!! And even that, I started to get addicted to do it twice a day like on drugs 😂 can't wait until the next time pricking my finger
The more I see these devices and how diabetics are looking for answers the more pissed off I get at these companies for essentially making false claims in their advertising. I've learned a great deal about blood glucose and diabetes in the past few months and now feel obligated to tell people not to put any trust or hope in these non invasive watches.
Glucose meter in this smartwatch is totally inaccurate and must not be allowed in this watch. Its dangerous for diabetics. It should be tested on people with high diabetes like 12 to 15 qnd over.
Any knowledgeable diabetic who uses either a CGM or BGM will know these "smart watches" are not accurate when it comes to reliable BG measurements. I am a type 1 diabetic and I will buy a watch like this in order to quickly obtain a reading when I can't physically perform a BG measurement. I used to use a CGM but their cost is extremely prohibitive. Your comment "must not be allowed in this watch. Its dangerous for diabetics" is total nonsense and is counter productive for continuous improvement and research.
Solo quiero aportar diciendo que las mediciones de glicemia con cualquier aparato, son inexactas. Yo he comparado en reiteradas ocasiones las mediciones de mi sensor "free style" con las de un glucómetro convencional y he llegado a comprobar hasta un 40% de diferencias, lo que es una brutalidad. Creo que en este campo de las mediciones de azúcar en sangre, la ciencia está al debe. Supongo que por ahora no hay ningún reloj que acierte con una lectura confiable.
I just want to contribute by saying that blood glucose measurements with any device are inaccurate. I have repeatedly compared the measurements of my "free style" sensor with those of a conventional glucometer and I have come to see up to 40% differences, which is brutal. I believe that in this field of blood sugar measurements, science it is not up to date. I guess for now there is no watch that hits with a reliable reading.
PTT push to talk man.
Nope. Pulse Transit Time. www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/pulse-transit-time