I pause the video for a while to read the relevant section again, forget what was happening in the video, and unpause to hear "we live in a society." Brilliant timing on my part
Solidarity from Afghanistan. More power to IMT , long live international workers democracy. Down with nationalism, imperialism and religious extremism......
@@smoke1830 Please, PLEASE don't keep repeating this piece of idiocy. Marx's ideas have been hugely influential in economies all over the world, in cultural studies and in all the arts. I can't think of theoretical body of work that's been more important in forming modern consciousness. To say "Marx has been tried" - whatever that even means! - just proves that you're completely ignorant of the subject, and are trying to score some kind of ideological point with other know-nothings.
@@authenticallysuperficial9874 its not missleading, the classes are intended so that its a reading exercise of das kapital. you should read a section of the book between each episode
Thank you for making these lectures widely accessible and helping the masses understand such an important text. I’ve always been too intimidated to read capital but these lectures make the text enjoyable and that much more enlightening.
Yes! My students are always amazed that Marx is actually FUNNY. I love that! But yes: it's hard to read the Big Books on your own. When I was in grad school, we formed a Capital reading group, and that really helped.
@@billybudd8225 Not really, it is a very complicated book that requires a lot of political and economic knowledge to be properly dissected, which is good to have a specialist to help with that
Thanks Professor Harvey for this lecture: "Rise, like lions after slumber In unvanquishable number! Shake your chains to earth, like dew Which in sleep had fallen on you: Ye are many-they are few!"
After reading the relevant chapter and listen to his lecture in audio form much fruitful to understand the the abstractions of Marx.whenever i repeatedly listen to the lecture new things crop up in mind.An excellent presentation.
Wow another go at Capital. I had listened to the previous course religiously so I am happy to have another reading. I may have to break out the text and follow along
55:43 “I am exceedingly glad to learn that your health is progressing well. For the past 3 weeks I, too, have again been dosing myself and only stopped doing so today. I had been overdoing very much my nocturnal labours, accompanied, it is true, by mere lemonade on the one hand, but an immense deal of tobacco on the other. I am, by the way, discovering some nice arguments. E.g. I have completely demolished the theory of profit as hitherto propounded.” - Marx to Engels, Jan. 11, 1858
I thought reading War and Peace was an achievement. Then I read Chateaubriand's Memories and thought so. Then I read Proust's Memories and thought so. But Nothing prepared me for Capital, Volume I, II, and III. Shakespeare is hard; Donne harder; Marx hardest.
To anyone coming to these videos with the goal of reading Capital; a) welcome, but b) don't worry about the big flow chart this lecturer likes to use throughout the lecture series. It's not nonsensical but it becomes close to it. You'll develop your own understanding of the flow of labour as you read Marx's work.
Since there are 12 parts to this video series, can someone let me know what chapters each part covers? I assumed it would be each part of Capital Vol. 1 for each video, but there's only 8 parts in the book if I remember correctly. Would really appreciate some guidance here! Love from Pakistan :)
10z20 That’s exactly my question: as far as I can say, the 2007 was better. The difference between terms “appear” and “is” in the first sentence of the Capital, in the 2007 version mentioned but in this new one, he just mentioned it when someone asked him a question.
I've watched video 1-3 of the 2007 talks, and in my opinion this version is better because it gives more of a complete overview at the beginning, whereas the 2007 talks are more cumulative and it took me a while to understand where you are / what's the argument.
A blackboard will help to lay out the theoretical concepts Dr. Harvey is speaking about. Visual aids are always a good learning tool. Verbally the lecture is fantastic and people should get a lot from this.
@@geedebored5108 Am reading it now. I wish I can discuss it in a group. I found the first chapters completely understandable against a back drop of writer’s who say the first three chapters are the hardest, but if skipped, and not understood I think the rest of the book is not understandable, because the method he uses is the method used in all other sections of the book. Anyway. My question had no other motive.
Take this advice from someone who attended the seminars: David Harvey, god bless him, simply rehashed what he has already published in his Companion to Marx books (so just go buy them). The only new information is in this video on his attempt to characterize the system Marx "discovered" as similar to that of a hydrological cycle. This analogy is especially apt since Wall Streeters think about money (movement) in terms of liquidity, at least for now.
I am not sure if anybody have asked this before but I was wondering if you have the audio only version of your readings from Capitol almost like an audiobook? Thank you!
typically within kapital, "developed form" addresses the nature of the market and industry. a developed form would exist in London, while it might not in South America. that being historic is also just an additive, think of this as the way we might use "historical document" or "historical commentary." to circle back, though we don't think of certain areas immediately outside London to be underdeveloped and without industry, but in that period of the late 19th century, it somewhat was, also, not in many other places was the empirical evidence of capitalism and it's functions available, certainly not publicly. hope this helps, solidarity!
@Alan Doane do you think I should go through part 1 of the earlier one, then part one of this one and so on? Or should I completely finish the earlier course first, then come back and go through it again with this course?
@TheCanMan Can Since 1990 Michael Hudson doesn't get what Marx lays out in the first chapter of Volume 1 of Capital, how the hell would he be an authority on Volume 3?
3 ปีที่แล้ว
1:39:00 Value is in contant change do to many things: productivity, technoogy, demand, etc...
The sound quality is awful. Compared to the original youtube lectures it is actually worse.,someobe needs to sort it out as it is making understanding the material more difficult.
How do you explain the degree to which Marx overlooks the fact that different commodities are worth different things (exchange value) to different people depending on the situation? He seems to jump right into exchange value on page 1 and say that this is equal to that, end of story. Maybe someone can enlighten me.
Do you mean with his specific examples of cloth = coats and the like? In which case these are simply examples that change. In fact, considering the relationship between value (as affected by labor) and exchange value, the value can very much change based on what the actors involved deem "socially valuable labor." Additionally, he doesn't mean value as price, as supply and demand still affect price in Marx's view (the difference arising that similar supplies and demands for different products will not necessarily create the same price, meaning there must be an underlying value). So essentially, he doesn't so much ignore this as it lies in implied details. Your evaluation of the value involved, as well as the other party's, will change it because it is a social thing, and the spatial-personal details will affect demand, and therefore the price in that instance that is born from the value. Exchange any problems in my articulation of this, I'm dealing both with understanding Marx myself, and Marx's problem of putting down complicated jumbles of thought in simple terms.
Marx is talking about value in the sense of classical economics, the same kind of value that Smith wrestled with. Marx was perfectly aware of supply and demand, but supply and demand doesn't tell us why different commodities exchange at different rates under perfect market conditions. So yes, there could be a hypothetical situation where a person would exchange a diamond for a loaf of bread, but that doesn't reflect the normal prices of either diamonds or bread. The question is: why _in general_ does a loaf of bread cost less than a diamond. The answer for Marx (and I'm oversimplifying slightly) is that less labour power goes into making bread than extracting diamonds. This is why we're talking about value rather than price. Prices fluctuate according to conditions of supply and demand, value is the point around which they fluctuate. Value itself fluctuates according to the prevailing methods of production used to create any given commodity.
@@monkeymox2544 Thanks for your reply, that clears it up. though I wonder under current conditions whether we can still say that the definition holds? I'll have to think more about it
@@michaelthomheadley you're welcome! When you refer to "current conditions", what are you wondering about precisely? I ask because Marx sees the prevailing conditions of production as determining value. Value is determined by the average amount of labour time it takes to produce any give commodity, with the average degree of skill required to make it, using the methods and technologies which are prevelant. So if for example a new machine or technique is developed that allows commodity x to be produced in half the time, the value of that commodity halves. In other words, "current conditions" are built into the theory.
39:40 *Kapitał to pieniądze użyte w specyficzny sposób a mianowicie: to pieniądze użyte w celu pomnożenia pieniędzy. W kapitalizmie produkcyjnym pieniądze są użyte aby zakupić towary a w szczególności dwa rodzaje towarów: 1)siłę roboczą i 2)Środki produkcji. Te dwa rodzaje towarów są użyte w procesie produkcyjnym aby wytworzyć nowe towary: środki produkcji, towary luksusowe i towary kupowane za płacę roboczą*
1:11:50 Społecznie niezbędnym czasem pracy jest czas pracy potrzebny do wytworzenia jakiejś wartości użytkowej w istniejących społecznie normalnych warunkach produkcji i przy społecznie przeciętnym stopniu umiejętności i intensywności pracy.
Love the irony of none of these videos being captioned :) I’ve luckily already had the opportunity to read Das Kapital in a class setting but it would be nice to learn more about it 🙃
Посоветовал всем, Политэкономия, учебник. Островитянов, 1954 г. Есть в сети на русском и даже на ютубе в аудиоверсии. Он основан на трудах Маркса, Ленина, на опыте прошедшей революции, на опыте построения социалистической экономики.
At 19:00 ish…"Free Gifts Of Human Nature." This caught me by surprise. In relation to the establishment of the "Socially Necessary Value of Something", this caught me by surprise. Question: What might be an example of "Free Gifts Of Human Nature" in this Marxist context?
a fun side dish for Harvey's class, or a great way for newbies to get an overall pic of Marx's ideas in layman's terms is this vid someone shared with me a few years back - th-cam.com/video/qJuuZoF9WT8/w-d-xo.html Enjoy!
I'm a millennial who is very excited to see the havoc your generation wreaks. I thought I was extremist - you guys are on a whole other level though, and I mean that in the best way possible. Give 'em hell. Don't compromise. No half-measures. Hopefully the planet doesn't completely cook before you all can turn the tables.
"And it was an Idealist conception that human beings have been alienated from their own potentiality and nature." This was Marx' subjective Idealist position, not the German Idealist trend culminating in Hegel. Ironically, in the Manuscripts, Marx makes the very move he falsely accuses Hegel of (the one you have mentioned in the quote above). The Objective Idealist conception of Alienation or Externalization (Entfremdung/Entäusserung) a la Hegel is what is now called "dialectical materialism". The split between thought and its object, between a subject and the objective world, marks an irreversible form of alienation which sets into motion the externalization of the spirit of a person/people to project onto and subsequently alter extended substance or what we now call Matter. However, Matter isn't merely this inert universal substance , as 'it' does not apply this Notion to "itself" (funny enough Marx sounds much more mystical to me on this point), but rather is subsequently elevated to thought after the instances of manifestations of material events are elevated to a general concept in thought which we call Matter. Late Marx, in his fully developed phase, is where he is truly Hegelian and understands this dialectical relation between the extended substance, matter, Being etc and thought which divides, unites, posits, particularizes and generalizes. Capital is Hegel's Logic applied to economics...A monumental feat!
I pause the video for a while to read the relevant section again, forget what was happening in the video, and unpause to hear "we live in a society." Brilliant timing on my part
Solidarity from Afghanistan. More power to IMT , long live international workers democracy. Down with nationalism, imperialism and religious extremism......
This man was my professor during my PhD - He's brilliant and was the best lecturer I ever experienced.
Just remember every time Marx has been tried it failed.
@@smoke1830 Please, PLEASE don't keep repeating this piece of idiocy. Marx's ideas have been hugely influential in economies all over the world, in cultural studies and in all the arts. I can't think of theoretical body of work that's been more important in forming modern consciousness.
To say "Marx has been tried" - whatever that even means! - just proves that you're completely ignorant of the subject, and are trying to score some kind of ideological point with other know-nothings.
@@profe3330 Name a country where Marx was tried and it is a success? Just name it?
@@profe3330 Idiot is a key word associated with ancient Greece, or Alexander the Great, do you know what it means.
@@smoke1830 Pretty much EVERY country has been influenced by Marx and Marxism in one form or another.
Look it up. I dare ya.
very grateful to everyone except the sound technician for this fantastic video
to the gulag!
"the revolution will not be televised" etc. etc. 😂
Being a sound technician can be hard 😔 besides, the real screw up here is the editor not cutting the first ten minutes
Nice mic, mic stand, good position. And completely wrecked by having terrible processing.
Just needs a high-pass filter.
Lecture starts at 11:45
Thank you :)
A guy scratches his nose at 1:00:46
Thank you.
@@kitlangton Thank you, saved me a lot of time
Kit Langton thank you so much for keeping us updated - I'd been looking for this
The beginning of the video at first led me to believe that it was literally about watching Harvey read Capital.
lol
same lol. I was like, "buckle up!"
that would be so beautiful
And the misleading title
@@authenticallysuperficial9874 its not missleading, the classes are intended so that its a reading exercise of das kapital. you should read a section of the book between each episode
I remember reading all 3 volumes of Capital in grad school and using Harvey's videos. They helped alot and gave me greater appreciation for Marx.
What were you using them for?
@@متين-ج4ز I'm doing the same and it helps me understand the text more by listening to Davids lectures.
What in the world is wrong with you
I ve started reading volume one, is a great experience
Shame he doesn't have any videos for vol 3
Thank you for making these lectures widely accessible and helping the masses understand such an important text. I’ve always been too intimidated to read capital but these lectures make the text enjoyable and that much more enlightening.
Thank you for allowing us to access information for free! Lets keep fighting for education
Brilliant summary diagram explaining the whole from 39:28; great for visual learner, enhances his verbal explanation.
Best to read it as a student before your life necessitates reading it.
True. In order to resist Marxist nonsense, it's best to be familiar with this stupidity.
I am in the process of reading Capital It is a tough read at times but very humourous and others are very enjoyable read plus educational
Yes! My students are always amazed that Marx is actually FUNNY. I love that! But yes: it's hard to read the Big Books on your own. When I was in grad school, we formed a Capital reading group, and that really helped.
Chapter one begins at 1:01:27
Lmao 1 hour of intro
Maxine 28Ve Only a true Marxist spends an hour on an introduction
If you're going to skip the intro, you might as well skip the whole lecture series and just read the book, you're missing the point
@@maxine3978 the intro is actually very interesting
@@billybudd8225 Not really, it is a very complicated book that requires a lot of political and economic knowledge to be properly dissected, which is good to have a specialist to help with that
Thanks Professor Harvey for this lecture:
"Rise, like lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number!
Shake your chains to earth, like dew
Which in sleep had fallen on you:
Ye are many-they are few!"
I love all the subtle context you add to the text, there's a lot of stuff that just goes over your head when reading the book
1:04:00 HE SAID IT
based
We doooooo
I cannot thank you enough for making this available
Marx is a challenging thinker, so becoming a scholar of his works is a serious business.
After reading the relevant chapter and listen to his lecture in audio form much fruitful to understand the the abstractions of Marx.whenever i repeatedly listen to the lecture new things crop up in mind.An excellent presentation.
Wow another go at Capital. I had listened to the previous course religiously so I am happy to have another reading. I may have to break out the text and follow along
you listened religiously? marx would be ashamed. listen _critically_
55:43 “I am exceedingly glad to learn that your health is progressing well. For the past 3 weeks I, too, have again been dosing myself and only stopped doing so today. I had been overdoing very much my nocturnal labours, accompanied, it is true, by mere lemonade on the one hand, but an immense deal of tobacco on the other. I am, by the way, discovering some nice arguments. E.g. I have completely demolished the theory of profit as hitherto propounded.” - Marx to Engels, Jan. 11, 1858
Critics of capitalism studies how capitalism works. Critics of Marxism never even read his book.
Вижу Девида Харви ставлю лайк! Пролетарии всез стран объединяйтесь! Hello from Russia!
I have watched 4 hour lectures, and took notes on them! So Bring it on!
I'm a chinese translator，Could I upload my subtitle？
Sure thing!
@@PeoplesForum Yeah!I still need to complete it,after then I will unplod,thank you
@@linyou5844 this is amazing! international workers' solidarity!
@@NewAgeNomad93 YES!
@@PeoplesForum I have uploaded Bilingual subtitles.for english version，there are some mistakes，because it from youtube auto submit
42:58 volume 1 concentrates on money capital trhrough commodities and realization of value, 2.- circulations and 3.- distribution
I thought reading War and Peace was an achievement.
Then I read Chateaubriand's Memories and thought so.
Then I read Proust's Memories and thought so. But
Nothing prepared me for Capital, Volume I, II, and III.
Shakespeare is hard; Donne harder; Marx hardest.
Have you tried Hegel... ?:)
@@GianPietroFarina88 I am convinced even Hegel didn't understand himself
Have you tried yoga?
@@GianPietroFarina88 A helluva drug.
And then there is Hegel and Phenomenology of Spirit...
To anyone coming to these videos with the goal of reading Capital; a) welcome, but b) don't worry about the big flow chart this lecturer likes to use throughout the lecture series. It's not nonsensical but it becomes close to it. You'll develop your own understanding of the flow of labour as you read Marx's work.
Since there are 12 parts to this video series, can someone let me know what chapters each part covers? I assumed it would be each part of Capital Vol. 1 for each video, but there's only 8 parts in the book if I remember correctly. Would really appreciate some guidance here!
Love from Pakistan :)
Class 1, Introduction
Class 2, Chapter 1
Class 3, Chapters 2 & 3
Class 4, Chapters 4, 5 & 6
Class 5, Chapters 7, 8 & 9
Class 6, Chapters 10 & 11
Class 7: Chapters 12, 13 & 14
Class 8: Chapter 15 (first part)
Class 9: Chapter 15 (second part)
Class 10: Chapters 23 & 24
Class 11: Chapter 25
Class 12: Chapters 26-33
Happy studying comrade!
@@MattWrafter thank you so so much!
So thrilled that I stumbled on to this series!!
Hi. Free market capitalist here trying to learn Marx. Maybe when I'm done ill come back and say what I learned.
Which one is preferable, the 2007 or the 2019 edition?
10z20 That’s exactly my question: as far as I can say, the 2007 was better. The difference between terms “appear” and “is” in the first sentence of the Capital, in the 2007 version mentioned but in this new one, he just mentioned it when someone asked him a question.
I've watched video 1-3 of the 2007 talks, and in my opinion this version is better because it gives more of a complete overview at the beginning, whereas the 2007 talks are more cumulative and it took me a while to understand where you are / what's the argument.
A genuine question, will you guys be able to provide an english subs for all these videos?
Thank you for bringing that up. For the moment, we recommend turning on the Auto-generated captions that TH-cam provides.
There should be subs for every living language on earth
@@PeoplesForum that's a terrible recommendation
Thank you last question guy! Harvey's response was hella interesting and clarifying.
big up comrades! from Perú!
Harvey does make Capital more accessible.
A blackboard will help to lay out the theoretical concepts Dr. Harvey is speaking about.
Visual aids are always a good learning tool.
Verbally the lecture is fantastic and people should get a lot from this.
He uses a blackboard in the other version of this class you can find on TH-cam!
@@geedebored5108 Have you read Capital?
@@MrDXRamirez yes, a couple times, why?
@@geedebored5108 Am reading it now. I wish I can discuss it in a group. I found the first chapters completely understandable against a back drop of writer’s who say the first three chapters are the hardest, but if skipped, and not understood I think the rest of the book is not understandable, because the method he uses is the method used in all other sections of the book. Anyway. My question had no other motive.
Don't be so demanding. Are you paying for this lecture? Just be grateful.
Take this advice from someone who attended the seminars: David Harvey, god bless him, simply rehashed what he has already published in his Companion to Marx books (so just go buy them). The only new information is in this video on his attempt to characterize the system Marx "discovered" as similar to that of a hydrological cycle. This analogy is especially apt since Wall Streeters think about money (movement) in terms of liquidity, at least for now.
I am not sure if anybody have asked this before but I was wondering if you have the audio only version of your readings from Capitol almost like an audiobook? Thank you!
We have added most Episodes to our new Podcast. Please visit tpf.link to check it out.
@@PeoplesForum this link doesn't seem to work? has it moved or gone offline?
That was amazing, I'm excited to hear the rest.
At 51:00, what is a "historically developed form"? Can anyone explain/expound on what that means, please?
typically within kapital, "developed form" addresses the nature of the market and industry. a developed form would exist in London, while it might not in South America.
that being historic is also just an additive, think of this as the way we might use "historical document" or "historical commentary." to circle back, though we don't think of certain areas immediately outside London to be underdeveloped and without industry, but in that period of the late 19th century, it somewhat was, also, not in many other places was the empirical evidence of capitalism and it's functions available, certainly not publicly.
hope this helps, solidarity!
should I watch this series or the 2010 version that takes place in a classroom?
@Alan Doane do you think I should go through part 1 of the earlier one, then part one of this one and so on? Or should I completely finish the earlier course first, then come back and go through it again with this course?
Use value, exchange value, and value 1:10:15.
1:21:58
has anyone got any idea why prof. Harvey doesn't teach vol.3?
Harvey dealt with Grundresse and Capital v. 3 in his lectures on Capital vol. 2.
@Rabble Repository where does michael hudson talk about it?
@TheCanMan Can Since 1990 Michael Hudson doesn't get what Marx lays out in the first chapter of Volume 1 of Capital, how the hell would he be an authority on Volume 3?
1:39:00 Value is in contant change do to many things: productivity, technoogy, demand, etc...
A wonderful and much needed video.
56:14 dialectical motion of value: idea production, comodity, circulation, distribution, money form= value. Thats what causes work...the processs
1:01:24 ¿Porqué comenzó con el análisis de la mercancía?
A question to the Hosts; what is the exact copy of Capital that David Harvey is reading from there? Thankyou
the copy he's reading here is the penguin classic version, hope this helps sorry im late!
Thanks Prof. Harvey
Long forum is growing online with the youth, the idea of bite sized blahs blahs blahs it's not true. ♡ love this thank u!
The sound quality is awful. Compared to the original youtube lectures it is actually worse.,someobe needs to sort it out as it is making understanding the material more difficult.
How do you explain the degree to which Marx overlooks the fact that different commodities are worth different things (exchange value) to different people depending on the situation? He seems to jump right into exchange value on page 1 and say that this is equal to that, end of story. Maybe someone can enlighten me.
Do you mean with his specific examples of cloth = coats and the like? In which case these are simply examples that change. In fact, considering the relationship between value (as affected by labor) and exchange value, the value can very much change based on what the actors involved deem "socially valuable labor." Additionally, he doesn't mean value as price, as supply and demand still affect price in Marx's view (the difference arising that similar supplies and demands for different products will not necessarily create the same price, meaning there must be an underlying value). So essentially, he doesn't so much ignore this as it lies in implied details. Your evaluation of the value involved, as well as the other party's, will change it because it is a social thing, and the spatial-personal details will affect demand, and therefore the price in that instance that is born from the value. Exchange any problems in my articulation of this, I'm dealing both with understanding Marx myself, and Marx's problem of putting down complicated jumbles of thought in simple terms.
Marx is talking about value in the sense of classical economics, the same kind of value that Smith wrestled with. Marx was perfectly aware of supply and demand, but supply and demand doesn't tell us why different commodities exchange at different rates under perfect market conditions. So yes, there could be a hypothetical situation where a person would exchange a diamond for a loaf of bread, but that doesn't reflect the normal prices of either diamonds or bread.
The question is: why _in general_ does a loaf of bread cost less than a diamond. The answer for Marx (and I'm oversimplifying slightly) is that less labour power goes into making bread than extracting diamonds. This is why we're talking about value rather than price. Prices fluctuate according to conditions of supply and demand, value is the point around which they fluctuate. Value itself fluctuates according to the prevailing methods of production used to create any given commodity.
@@monkeymox2544 Thanks for your reply, that clears it up. though I wonder under current conditions whether we can still say that the definition holds? I'll have to think more about it
@@michaelthomheadley you're welcome! When you refer to "current conditions", what are you wondering about precisely? I ask because Marx sees the prevailing conditions of production as determining value. Value is determined by the average amount of labour time it takes to produce any give commodity, with the average degree of skill required to make it, using the methods and technologies which are prevelant. So if for example a new machine or technique is developed that allows commodity x to be produced in half the time, the value of that commodity halves. In other words, "current conditions" are built into the theory.
Marx uses the assumptions of classical economics, i.e., perfect competition making the price of a commodity constant in all cases
39:40
*Kapitał to pieniądze użyte w specyficzny sposób a mianowicie: to pieniądze użyte w celu pomnożenia pieniędzy. W kapitalizmie produkcyjnym pieniądze są użyte aby zakupić towary a w szczególności dwa rodzaje towarów: 1)siłę roboczą i 2)Środki produkcji. Te dwa rodzaje towarów są użyte w procesie produkcyjnym aby wytworzyć nowe towary: środki produkcji, towary luksusowe i towary kupowane za płacę roboczą*
1:11:50
Społecznie niezbędnym czasem pracy jest czas pracy potrzebny do wytworzenia jakiejś wartości użytkowej w istniejących społecznie normalnych warunkach produkcji i przy społecznie przeciętnym stopniu umiejętności i intensywności pracy.
So glad I found this.
does anyone know what edition of Capital he is citing from?
Penguin
This man is extremely intelligent.
1:15:17 socially necesary labor times depends on productivity
Why there is not subtitles
thanks for posting! can you attend these sessions in person?
Hey Comrade Ana👋
1:01:40 is where he starts discussing Chapter 1.
46:00
*Metoda prezentacji musi się różnić od metody badawczej*
*Posłowie do wydnia drugiego*
Great conference
bookmark / commodities section 1 lecture - 1:01:23
which Version of capital should I choose?
the one you see him reading here is the Penguin classic version. hope this helps!
1:20:50 Productos que no tienen valor de mercancia o valor de uso por "otros". Ejemplos
1:01:37 se da cuenta que todo comienza con una inmenza cantidad de mercancías.....ésa será su prioridad para estudiar el sistema del capital
1:01:40 Comienza explicacion capitulo 1
1:34:00 Suply and demand
Love the irony of none of these videos being captioned :) I’ve luckily already had the opportunity to read Das Kapital in a class setting but it would be nice to learn more about it 🙃
Presently there is a complete transcript in the description. On a phone this feature is more easily read.
where is the superplus?
Chapter 1: 1:01:13
Plz tell Edition year he is reading
Посоветовал всем, Политэкономия, учебник. Островитянов, 1954 г. Есть в сети на русском и даже на ютубе в аудиоверсии. Он основан на трудах Маркса, Ленина, на опыте прошедшей революции, на опыте построения социалистической экономики.
Could you please fix the hiss in the audio?
"What Is Socially Necessary?" Quite the question, this.
Sorry. At 1:13 ish.
1:07:09 Use value versus exchange vaue
Whoa 2 hours each and there's 12 of them heck this is a LOT of marx but it's still easier than reading. Ok. Let's get a coffee and crack on
There's more volumes? o.o
Guys, is anybody interested in modification of the subtitles? If anyone can do 5 minutes it will be done in a week. Let’s do a collective work!
La meilleure solution pour un monde meilleur climat
great and exhaustive speech
Here, i m the first one from the next generation to comment here . Viva
1:24:08 need a want, a need and desire for the commodity. If it isn´t it has no value.
Is this in podcast mode?
47:00 Marxs dialectical method
Thank you for this videos, so can you make the subtitres on French ?
At 19:00 ish…"Free Gifts Of Human Nature." This caught me by surprise. In relation to the establishment of the "Socially Necessary Value of Something", this caught me by surprise.
Question: What might be an example of "Free Gifts Of Human Nature" in this Marxist context?
From the chart you can see free gifts of human nature flows to reproduction of labour power which happens by reproduction of humans
Thanks
39:00 capital graph
22:03 Purpose according to Marx
30:45 law of motion in the capitalist mode of production
Is each video covering a single chapter? I just finished reading chapter 1
Each video covers one "part" of Capital I. The first part of the book includes three chapters.
@@jennyye1703 Thank you!
Class 1, Introduction
Class 2, Chapter 1
Class 3, Chapters 2 & 3
Class 4, Chapters 4, 5 & 6
Class 5, Chapters 7, 8 & 9
Class 6, Chapters 10 & 11
Class 7: Chapters 12, 13 & 14
Class 8: Chapter 15 (first part)
Class 9: Chapter 15 (second part)
Class 10: Chapters 23 & 24
Class 11: Chapter 25
Class 12: Chapters 26-33
@@MattWrafter Thanks
a fun side dish for Harvey's class, or a great way for newbies to get an overall pic of Marx's ideas in layman's terms is this vid someone shared with me a few years back - th-cam.com/video/qJuuZoF9WT8/w-d-xo.html
Enjoy!
GEN Z FOR MARX!!! ANYONE? ✊🏾✊🏽✊🏼✊🏻
✊✊✊
GEN Z FOR MARX
VIVE L'INTERNATIONALE!
I'm a millennial who is very excited to see the havoc your generation wreaks. I thought I was extremist - you guys are on a whole other level though, and I mean that in the best way possible.
Give 'em hell. Don't compromise. No half-measures. Hopefully the planet doesn't completely cook before you all can turn the tables.
@@roseredflechette-vidya No there won't be any compromise.
Hell yeah!✊🏻
20:00 El método de Marx : abstracción
I love David Harvey but this audio quality is so bad 😢 I’ll continue to watch but damn… the static hurts my ears.
"And it was an Idealist conception that human beings have been alienated from their own potentiality and nature." This was Marx' subjective Idealist position, not the German Idealist trend culminating in Hegel. Ironically, in the Manuscripts, Marx makes the very move he falsely accuses Hegel of (the one you have mentioned in the quote above).
The Objective Idealist conception of Alienation or Externalization (Entfremdung/Entäusserung) a la Hegel is what is now called "dialectical materialism". The split between thought and its object, between a subject and the objective world, marks an irreversible form of alienation which sets into motion the externalization of the spirit of a person/people to project onto and subsequently alter extended substance or what we now call Matter.
However, Matter isn't merely this inert universal substance , as 'it' does not apply this Notion to "itself" (funny enough Marx sounds much more mystical to me on this point), but rather is subsequently elevated to thought after the instances of manifestations of material events are elevated to a general concept in thought which we call Matter.
Late Marx, in his fully developed phase, is where he is truly Hegelian and understands this dialectical relation between the extended substance, matter, Being etc and thought which divides, unites, posits, particularizes and generalizes.
Capital is Hegel's Logic applied to economics...A monumental feat!
You are right, the problem is the transitioning from idealism to materialism. Something is evidently going to be lost, on a scientifically viewpoint.
Marx’s new world in practice would be pretty crude in respect to the past.
can anyone translate it to other languages?
Thank u 🙏🏽