Last 3 weeks Seahawks defense has allowed 12 points a game in regulation, 14 points a game including overtime, against a full strength Rams, a full strength 49ers offense and a full strength Cardinals offense. Took some time but macdonald has it worked out now. Seattle gonna be a different beast now
Broncos vs raiders was such a intense game until halfway through the third quarter Gritty win i like this underdog story we have going on at the moment the last few weeks
I dont think the Broncos qualify as "underdogs". Underdogs are overlooked and better than what general perception would be. The Broncos are showing through their level of play that they're just a good team, but nothing more and nothing less. Not a bad team but nobody thinks they're a threat and that's rightly so because they only beat bad teams, aside from that Falcons game.
@fadya.3660 almost all the pundits had them winning 5 games at most, some said they would be picking top 3 in the 2025 draft. Being in the playoff hunt is definitely an underdog story.
@@economicsmadeeasy5266 if it is a good win, does that change the sentiment at all? No. They’re still a good team that isn’t a great team, and still not perceived to be a threat (and rightly so). They’re a good team and that it. There’s a clear line between the elite of the AFC and where the Broncos are. And there’s a clear line from where the bad teams are and where the Broncos are.
@@Mobil3targ3t sure if you’re interpreting the premise of “underdogs” to be based on preseason expectations. I’m interpreting it as of right now. Are they underdogs in terms of what they can accomplish going forward? Nope. They’re firmly where they should be. Not to be overlooked but also not to be concerned about.
Though I appreciate the hype up on the Vikings, I am OK if they’re not in the highest tier, but they’re definitely higher than Green Bay and that’s the thing that’s most annoying. We beat Green Bay, we beat the Texans, we beat the 49ers when they were healthy, and our two losses were to the Lions by two points and then to the Rams four days later when they got Nacua and Kupp Back and Darrisaw got injured
Ranking green bay over the Vikings is actually nuts. They have a better record and the Vikings beat them in Lambeau. Darnold also has better stats than Love *across the board*.
The eagles win over LA came without Davante Smith, a key target receiver. I wonder if Davante was in, would have Saquan been given the ball as much? Ok, lets now see an Eagles with Davante and AJ brown in, and Saquan out. Can Kenny Gainwell and the O line get past Detroit's D and can the Eagles D line put enough pressure on Goff in the post-season?...I think there is a strong case to be made that the Eagles could come away with a W and we'll see another Chiefs V Eagles Superbowl.
1 ok 2 no, #3 3 no, #6 4 no, #2 5 no, #7, they have one of the easiest strength of schedules 6 lol, no, lolololol, Steelers, lolol 7 this is moronic 4 for sure
@kpowers Maybe the Lions, in a really off game... but the Eagles, please, the Eagles suck so many balls Jenna Jameson is telling them to stay in their lanes. Eagles have the easiest strength of schedule of the four primary contenders. The only thing worse than the Eagles are blind Eagles fans.
Vikings have the third roughest strength of schedule and are in the most competitive division, this year, in the NFL, and they are 9-2. Being 8th on this list is the stupidest football opinion I've seen in quite a long time. Arguably, the Steelers strength of schedule being the second toughest in the NFL should probably put them higher than 7 as well, but that one is likely just wrong versus plain stupid, like with the Vikings ranking on here. Vikings behind Green Bay is the stupid cherry on top of the stupid bowl of ice cream. The Vikings one team ahead of a team with three losses in a row. You don't hate the Vikings, sure, ok, but your opinion of them is certifiably stupid. The Vikings are easily more likely to succeed than Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Green Bay, and the Eagles. Maybe fourth is ok, not accurate but not stupid. Seriously, do better.
How are the Bears not in the #1 overall pick area? They will not beat anyone in the NFC North. They lost to the Patriots. They got lucky to beat the Titans and the Jaguars.
Last 3 weeks Seahawks defense has allowed 12 points a game in regulation, 14 points a game including overtime, against a full strength Rams, a full strength 49ers offense and a full strength Cardinals offense. Took some time but macdonald has it worked out now. Seattle gonna be a different beast now
Definitely wouldn't say the 49ers were fully healthy, but the seshawks did play very well
@@AmondoShandonot fully healthy but still had cmc Deebo Jennings still had nice weapons forsure but yea definitely not fully healthy on offense
I'm so happy for my fellow Detroit fans. What a fun season! God bless ya'll!
Broncos vs raiders was such a intense game until halfway through the third quarter
Gritty win i like this underdog story we have going on at the moment the last few weeks
I dont think the Broncos qualify as "underdogs". Underdogs are overlooked and better than what general perception would be. The Broncos are showing through their level of play that they're just a good team, but nothing more and nothing less. Not a bad team but nobody thinks they're a threat and that's rightly so because they only beat bad teams, aside from that Falcons game.
@fadya.3660 almost all the pundits had them winning 5 games at most, some said they would be picking top 3 in the 2025 draft. Being in the playoff hunt is definitely an underdog story.
@@fadya.3660Tampa with Mike Evans and Chris Godwin at 2-0 beating them 26-7 isn’t a good win?
@@economicsmadeeasy5266 if it is a good win, does that change the sentiment at all? No. They’re still a good team that isn’t a great team, and still not perceived to be a threat (and rightly so). They’re a good team and that it. There’s a clear line between the elite of the AFC and where the Broncos are. And there’s a clear line from where the bad teams are and where the Broncos are.
@@Mobil3targ3t sure if you’re interpreting the premise of “underdogs” to be based on preseason expectations. I’m interpreting it as of right now. Are they underdogs in terms of what they can accomplish going forward? Nope. They’re firmly where they should be. Not to be overlooked but also not to be concerned about.
Though I appreciate the hype up on the Vikings, I am OK if they’re not in the highest tier, but they’re definitely higher than Green Bay and that’s the thing that’s most annoying. We beat Green Bay, we beat the Texans, we beat the 49ers when they were healthy, and our two losses were to the Lions by two points and then to the Rams four days later when they got Nacua and Kupp Back and Darrisaw got injured
The Vikings played a rusty/still-injured Jordan Love. Get ready...
Yes and no. Yes, should be higher than Green Bay. No, not ok thar they're in olayoff hopefully. They are definitely better than Baltimore and Philly.
Ranking green bay over the Vikings is actually nuts. They have a better record and the Vikings beat them in Lambeau. Darnold also has better stats than Love *across the board*.
31:14 he never said he likes sam darnold 🤔
lol he don’t like Sam Darnold.
@ 🙁
Bird Gang 🦅💚🗣️
Pretty much agree with your ranking. But I would move the Eagles in the 2nd spot
The eagles win over LA came without Davante Smith, a key target receiver. I wonder if Davante was in, would have Saquan been given the ball as much? Ok, lets now see an Eagles with Davante and AJ brown in, and Saquan out. Can Kenny Gainwell and the O line get past Detroit's D and can the Eagles D line put enough pressure on Goff in the post-season?...I think there is a strong case to be made that the Eagles could come away with a W and we'll see another Chiefs V Eagles Superbowl.
My power rankings after this week
1.Lions
2.Bills
3.Ravens
4.Cheifs
5.Eagles
6.Steelers
7.Vikings
8.Packers
9.Chargers
10.Broncos
11.Texans
12.Seahawks
13.Falcons
14.Cardinals
15.Commanders
16.Buccaneers
17.Dolphins
18.Rams
19.49ers
20.Colts
21.Bengals
22.Cowboys
23.Saints
24.Panthers
25.Browns
26.Bears
27.Jets
28.Titans
29.Patriots
30.Giants
31.Jaguars
32.Raiders
1 ok
2 no, #3
3 no, #6
4 no, #2
5 no, #7, they have one of the easiest strength of schedules
6 lol, no, lolololol, Steelers, lolol
7 this is moronic 4 for sure
Lions going to the Supey
The lions would smash kanssas city with ease
I agree. Chiefs would also be destroyed by the Eagles as well
Lololololololololol
@kpowers Maybe the Lions, in a really off game... but the Eagles, please, the Eagles suck so many balls Jenna Jameson is telling them to stay in their lanes. Eagles have the easiest strength of schedule of the four primary contenders. The only thing worse than the Eagles are blind Eagles fans.
Vikings have the third roughest strength of schedule and are in the most competitive division, this year, in the NFL, and they are 9-2. Being 8th on this list is the stupidest football opinion I've seen in quite a long time. Arguably, the Steelers strength of schedule being the second toughest in the NFL should probably put them higher than 7 as well, but that one is likely just wrong versus plain stupid, like with the Vikings ranking on here. Vikings behind Green Bay is the stupid cherry on top of the stupid bowl of ice cream. The Vikings one team ahead of a team with three losses in a row. You don't hate the Vikings, sure, ok, but your opinion of them is certifiably stupid. The Vikings are easily more likely to succeed than Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Green Bay, and the Eagles. Maybe fourth is ok, not accurate but not stupid. Seriously, do better.
Commanders and Texans would both lose to the Panthers right now. They need to be lower
You put the packers ahead of the vikes, Vikings have better record, and went into greenbay and beat them..wtf?
How are the Bears not in the #1 overall pick area? They will not beat anyone in the NFC North. They lost to the Patriots. They got lucky to beat the Titans and the Jaguars.
Probably because the teams below them are just that bad 😂
Green Bay is ass, and Sam Darnold is the NFL's new daddy.