@@AbstractTraitorHero yes, because it's a game, also the soviets won but allies forces were figthing japan in the pacific and axis in africa, huge lend lease to the soviets that helped way more than it is said in 1942-43 and just the threat of allies landing in france took away from the eastern front huge amounts of resources, before landing they also took Italy out so i wouldn't be so sure that the soviets would have won without uk (and commonwealth) help, not even considering US help.
@@leonardosalvati8488 The lend lease is usually greatly exaggerated and only non serious historians claim it's effect was super substantial, are you an American? That would explain how you could believe such drivel.
@@AbstractTraitorHero i'm italian, the ones that say that lend lease was like a few % of ussr production and stuff like that are usually not seeing WHAT was sent, you can have as many tanks as you want, if they don't have fuel they are death, also in 1942 the allies proposed to Molotov to reduce the lend lease the next year to open a new front the next year in Europe and Molotov said no, we need the lend lease. Also look at what and how much the soviets were eating, they were basically already starving to death. Lend lease did not change the course of the war but together with the other factors the soviets would have never won
Would've been more interesting if it was all cored, cuz otherwise its just weaker allies
Fair enough
I love your videos ❤
Thank you! 😊
What if ukraine and belarus is independent and joined axis?
Good idea :)
I like how they dont need to annex british raj instead of india
Yeah they dipped immediately lol
This is an oceania vs eurasia vs eastasia typa thing
What if Brazil joined axis?
BRASIL PAÍS NÚMERO UM DO MUNDO 🏳🌈🏳🌈🏳🌈🏳🌈🏳🌈🏳🌈🏳🌈
@@Jeffjeff_JJ um i don't understand you?
@@KARLPHIL14Then it will remain a secret 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
@@Jeffjeff_JJ oh ok but i love your videos!
@@KARLPHIL14 Lol. Thank you :)
Kinda ridiculous seeing the soviets fall like that.
They lasted till 45, in the game the allies should land in europe around 43 or it is lost
@@leonardosalvati8488 This is just not accurate to real life, the Soviets were going to win regardless of the allied landing.
@@AbstractTraitorHero yes, because it's a game, also the soviets won but allies forces were figthing japan in the pacific and axis in africa, huge lend lease to the soviets that helped way more than it is said in 1942-43 and just the threat of allies landing in france took away from the eastern front huge amounts of resources, before landing they also took Italy out so i wouldn't be so sure that the soviets would have won without uk (and commonwealth) help, not even considering US help.
@@leonardosalvati8488 The lend lease is usually greatly exaggerated and only non serious historians claim it's effect was super substantial, are you an American? That would explain how you could believe such drivel.
@@AbstractTraitorHero i'm italian, the ones that say that lend lease was like a few % of ussr production and stuff like that are usually not seeing WHAT was sent, you can have as many tanks as you want, if they don't have fuel they are death, also in 1942 the allies proposed to Molotov to reduce the lend lease the next year to open a new front the next year in Europe and Molotov said no, we need the lend lease. Also look at what and how much the soviets were eating, they were basically already starving to death. Lend lease did not change the course of the war but together with the other factors the soviets would have never won
Afghanistan living up to it's name till the end holding better then Soviet union
While Spain and Turkey looks scared doin mass recruiting
In their defence they are definitely allowed to be scared lol
bro, it's a video about the US and you didn't even include the US in it
@@salazar778 yes I did silly look at England and France
@@Jeffjeff_JJ not mainland USA
@@salazar778 tee hee
Next what if France annexed the USA
the bad timeline
Add stats pls