Susan Kozel: Phenomenology - Practice Based Research in the Arts, Stanford University
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
- Susan Kozel, professor of new media at Malmö University, was asked to contribute a lecture on Phenomenology to contribute to the course material for the Practice Based Research in the Arts course offered by Stanford University in the USA. This course was written and taught by theatre artists Leslie Hill and Helen Paris, both Associate Professors in Performance Making, with Ryan Tacata (artist and PhD candidate). This course is free and online novoed.com/pbr. Read more about Susan Kozel medea.mah.se/20...
I found this video is an insightful to make the bridge between physical experiences and spiritual experiences.Thank you, Susan.
I have found this video very inspiring for my current research project.
Hello Susan - Dominique here from London - I have just started a phd! Thank you for this useful video!
Love the conceptualization of phenomenology as a practice for bridging binaries/unhelpful divides.
Thank you. More please.
What a refreshing video on Practice base. I'm planing to do my Phd in Art Practice next year. Any good advice?
Thanks for this Susan.
beautiful
light
Thanks for making this video.
I was wondering how should we define phenomenologists. I think phenomenologists are guarded by phenomenology. And we should encouraged to practice phenomenology. But also we should work on the method as Husserl did. And what I suggest is to expand phenomenology. Phenomenology began from Descartes' "thinking I" And Husserl has followed that path. But perhaps should abandon that path, for "the I" seems so much to be the masculine object. So what do I suggest? Perhaps we should simply start from "epistemology". We do not have the I , the ego to hide. and frankly we are looking for knowledge. The academic life in the best is to "learn and live".
Thanks for the video. It gave me a lot of good thoughts.
What I understand about phenomenology is quite a bit different. Supposed to be you should separate your pre knowledge to the actual experience to get the essence or reduction of said experience. You can do this by bracketing or using hermeneutic circle; but what you described is about your subjective experience only without using any phenomenological method using descriptive or interpretative.
Could you please post the bibliography that is mentioned?
She is good in explaining phenomenology.
Thankyou 🙏
Interesting - and helpful - I would positing a ground or e primordial aesthetic as the natural condition - they is why things like tea ceremony and martial arts are "arts" . They give us access to this ground condition that us mostly unascertained. I am an advanced black belt (40 years training under Japanese teachers). Just in case you think that this does not have immediate practical (real world) implications.
Where can we get the book Closer?
What a wonderfully made video. I'm buying your book.
The course link is disconnected.
Sorry -- Interesting - and helpful - I would posit a ground or primordial aesthetic as the natural condition - that is why things like tea ceremony and martial arts are "arts" . They give us access to this ground condition that is mostly unascertained. I am an advanced black belt (40 years training under Japanese teachers). Just in case you think that this does not have immediate practical (real world) implications -- action and functionality.
Thank you for your insightful perspective! Could you please tell me, in which of his works I would find J L Nancy´s approach of the "philosophical anaesthesia"? Thanks in advance and kind regards from Germany
Amazing
thank you!
Great!!
too abstracted and loaded with terminology from academe.
Young lady you need zen not phenomenology in Husserl phenomenology comes get close to understanding the universal consciousness beyond matter and partially past transcendence . He hope er confuses immanence and transcendence the eastern intellectual tradition is too narcisstic to pearl from the people with higher melanin content there is history of the study of pure consciousness that spans three thousand years trying to reinvent the wheel
Talk about performative! Somehow endlessly decorated with pretentious terms and phrasing, yet all in service to her own vacant self-serving posturing. The only thing she achieves here is taking a little known area of philosophy that overlaps with the arts and manages to make it completely inaccessible and opaque!
Usurper.
Phenomenology is a load of crap
Think about it this way;Husserl's project as axiom of set theory. The axiomatic set theory has axioms but these are not proven. Mathematicians followed the axioms of set theory. And did mathematics. But they do not bother trying to prove the consistency of the mathematical system. The reason we have axioms obviously because they don't want to end up in trouble, mostly self-referencial ones, such as Russell's paradox. It took me a while to see where Husserl and his students were going.
Everyday life, as noting.
I've wasted many hours on Husserl and can attest that that is bullshit
If you are looking for results from Husserl you will be disillusioned. You can find results in existential phenomenologists. All statements are open to revision. Listen to Husserl's voice in the existential philosophers.
Lol, like Heidegger?
Language is the house of being. I wonder what the first house looked like? (probably just caves).