How to Redscale 35mm Color Film

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
  • What's up guys! In this video, I briefly describe what redscale or 'redscaling' your film is, and show you how to take any color negative film to create your own redscale. I give an example of how the iso changes affect the exposure, and some shots at the end to see what you can expect from a redscaled roll.
    -
    Ways to support the channel if you choose to:
    1. Sharing the video (IT’S FREE!)
    2. Affiliate Links (Amazon)
    Pre-made Redscale film: amzn.to/2xDLsAK
    35mm Cartridge Opener Tool: amzn.to/2HoUBT3
    Fuji Superia Color Film (35mm, 3 Rolls) - amzn.to/3z22qUO
    Tmax 400 Black and White Film (35mm, 2 Rolls) - amzn.to/3p2JClJ
    Kodak F9 Point and Shoot 35mm Film Camera - amzn.to/3z6GvMy
    Iford Sprite 35mm Point and Shoot Film Camera - amzn.to/32JQcV6
    Cinestill Color Film Home Develop Chemicals - amzn.to/3qwCVqS
    Patterson Develop Tanks - amzn.to/3qs1ipF
    -
    Redscaling is super easy!
    1. Take two 35mm rolls, one old roll already shot, and one new roll
    2. Make sure the finished roll has about an inch of film left sticking out
    3. Cut the leader end off the new roll.
    4. Match up the light brown with dark brown sides of each roll. (Basically, turn the new roll over).
    5. Use scotch tape to splice the film together.
    6. Go into a darkroom, or complete this part in a changing bag
    7. Pull the film out of the new roll a few inches, and then wind that section of film into old roll. Keep pressure on the spindle of the old roll so the canister doesn't unwind.
    8. When you've reached the end, cut the film of the new roll.
    9. If you need a film leader at the end, take the cut-off leader and line it up to re-cut it using scissors.
    10. Enjoy your super apocalypticly red pictures!
    -
    SUBSCRIBE!!! Every few days I'll be releasing new videos.
    -
    FIMF Links:
    Website- www.filmismoref...
    Instagram- / filmismorefun
    Facebook- / filmismorefun
    -
    Hi there. I'm Chris. Film is more fun is a place where I share about whatever busted up old camera I'm currently shooting and tinkering with, or my meanderings in film photography.
    It would be pretty rad if you said what's up. I'm 99% friendly. Definitely do that.
    Disclaimer: If you want technical proficiency go watch 'The Art of Photography' (love that show). These videos are more like an elderly person navigating a tv clicker.
    -
    Music Credits:
    Dusted wax kingdom
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    Tags:
    redscale, diy, lomo, red dragon, reverse, backwards, film, split filter, splitzer, lomo, image fusion, multiple exposure, double exposure, tmax, 3200, kodak, ilford, delta, film is more fun, develop, self-develop, photography, analog, lightroom, adobe, darkroom, olympus, nikon, pentax, yashica, minolta, canon, 35mm, 120, portra, superia, fuji, lomo, ektachrome, super 8, photoshop, grain, 1600, roll, velvia, xp2, hp5, ektar, 51,200 iso, 400, overexpose, underexpose, pushing, pulling, film photography, camera, vintage,

ความคิดเห็น • 96

  • @filmismorefun
    @filmismorefun  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ready-to-shoot experimental films available here:
    www.etsy.com/shop/AnalogImages
    REDdiculous 100 Redscale Film:
    analogimages.etsy.com/listing/1723596536/redscale-35mm-film-roll-36-exposures-iso
    LAVA 400 Experimental Film:
    analogimages.etsy.com/listing/1743405672/experimental-35mm-film-roll-36-exposures
    🙂

  • @orionriley5154
    @orionriley5154 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you! This was immensely helpful for simplifying the redscale process

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad to hear it was helpful 🙂

  • @knoptop
    @knoptop 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool shots at the end! Thanks for sharing!

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it 🙂

  • @_joka9
    @_joka9 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bruuuuuuuu!! those images are crazy nice!!!

  • @98Kentuckian
    @98Kentuckian 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Been wanting to try this forever, need to do it soon

  • @lifeonfilm7227
    @lifeonfilm7227 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First I thought what the heck is it good for but now I'm amazed. Much film, such red ...ehm.. scale :-)

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha! Yeah it definitely is... red! 🙂

  • @meitawinarto4118
    @meitawinarto4118 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm going to do it! Thanks for the video!!

  • @allysseriordan1073
    @allysseriordan1073 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That's a fantastic video. Thanks for taking the time to make it and sharing your knowledge. Now I want to give it a go myself. I may do that this week-end. Thanks for the inspiration :)

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Allysse! I'm glad you enjoyed the video. Definitely give it a shot, it's a blast, and gives some awesome effects. Please let me know how it turns out! 🙂

  • @dangerpowers123
    @dangerpowers123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video... I always learn loads from your channel 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Steve! I'm glad it was helpful. 🙂

    • @dangerpowers123
      @dangerpowers123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filmismorefun I'll definitely try it

  • @ec277
    @ec277 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much you saved my life

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Jess! I'm glad the video was helpful 🙂

  • @filmlovephotography
    @filmlovephotography 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Man you are messing with the film gods. Kodak on a fujifilm canisters? That film will torn out more a green scale 😵. A good way to redemption, at least shoot two rolls of each brand. Asap 😂

  • @matteo7867
    @matteo7867 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is great

  • @glass_lads6801
    @glass_lads6801 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hi Bud, I love the video! definitely gonna try it out!! Can I ask - are all the photos shown at the end over exposed by two stops? :) Thanks so much for the upload

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad you enjoyed the video! Not all of the images were exposed two stops over. The multiple exposures were shot where each exposure was rated at box speed. There are also a few shots in there that were not double exposed, but still shot at box speed. It depended on the scene, and how deep I wanted the red to be. 🙂

  • @filmcamerajourneys
    @filmcamerajourneys ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I find that 2 stops is even on the low side for some films. But, 2 is the average or the norm for me also.

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah it really depends on the tone you're after. Some films have a bit cleaner latitude when redscaling, 800t comes to mind.

    • @filmcamerajourneys
      @filmcamerajourneys ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filmismorefun I've never used a high iso film to red scale...although...that does make sense when you think about it. 800t or even portra 800 would make for interesting red scale films.

  • @sciguyisanerd
    @sciguyisanerd 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You can use the same technique to unredscale lomo redscale film

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True! Good point.

  • @joaogarcia755
    @joaogarcia755 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You could just place the canister you're loading in your camera and use the winder to do this

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about the roll you are pulling from? Where would that go?

    • @joaogarcia755
      @joaogarcia755 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filmismorefun you don’t have to close the back so it can just be there

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gotcha! That's what I was thinking you were saying, but just curious.

  • @stevek8829
    @stevek8829 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If you load film in the darkroom with a red light on this is the result. Don't ask how I know.

  • @Zifhang
    @Zifhang 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hey thanks for using my music [:

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, thank you for making it available on dusted wax! I have had your albums in my regular rotation for quite a while. Killer stuff man 🙂

    • @Zifhang
      @Zifhang 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      filmismorefun then you got to stay tuned for next monday; new album is coming ;)

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Zifhang Dope! I'll spread the word when it drops. Thanks for the heads up man.

    • @Zifhang
      @Zifhang 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      filmismorefun dustedwax.org/dwk377.html and its alive! :D

  • @trels203
    @trels203 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anybody know what happens when you do this to black and white film?

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  ปีที่แล้ว

      Most likely the photos will lack a bit of sharpness.

  • @fandyfirmansyah7761
    @fandyfirmansyah7761 ปีที่แล้ว

    Halo, is it possible to use ecn2/remjet film?
    For example kodak vision 3 250D

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, but you'll be shooting through the remjet layer.

  • @TheKondicional
    @TheKondicional 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi there, just discovered your channel and this great method! Love it - thanks a lot for the video! I have one question - what is gonna happen if I do the same reverse process with B&W film? Thanks a lot in advance for your reply!

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey there! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
      Yes, you can do this with black and white, but you will only acheive a softer image, and very slight exposure difference. I hope that helps! 🙂

    • @TheKondicional
      @TheKondicional 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filmismorefun thanks a lot for you quick reply! I will definitely try this out! Thanks again and be safe there! Hopefully we leave our places soon!

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheKondicional Yeah, my family's going stir crazy over here, but healthy haha. I hope all is well out your way, too.

  • @JimMelcher
    @JimMelcher ปีที่แล้ว

    This thing with the hands-it’s not working for me. Good info though, I just can’t watch it for long.

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  ปีที่แล้ว

      Well thanks for giving it a shot. This may be a better fit for you:
      filmismorefun.com/2022/02/20/how-to-diy-redscale-35mm-film/

  • @annadenaro9919
    @annadenaro9919 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How very interesting, I never knew that. Also how did you do those photos at the end, I know some are double exposures, but then the others I don't understand. Is it a filter, or a mirror or something?

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      On some images I used flagging in combination with multiple exposures. Basically, I blocked part of the lens with a black paper, took the first exposure, then flipped the camera upside-down blocking the opposite half, and took the second exposure. 🙂

    • @annadenaro9919
      @annadenaro9919 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filmismorefun oh yeah, I knew it would be something simple and I was just over thinking it

  • @emilioemilioo
    @emilioemilioo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, thanks for this :) I'd like to try it the hard way for thw sake of exposing both sides while still keeping the frames atop of one another. Do you havd any idea how I could make it a little less of a pain in the butt for myself?

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey there! Yeah, what I would recommend is to expose the roll normally (maybe less one or two stops) then develop the end of the leader to find the frame, mark the other side where the frame is and line it up with the shutter window.
      I have a video on how to find the frame of you need it:
      th-cam.com/video/d8-d_OhKcYU/w-d-xo.html
      I hope that helps! 🙂

    • @emilioemilioo
      @emilioemilioo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thanks :))

  • @7FilmRevenge
    @7FilmRevenge 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which film did you use to do the red scale? those looks nice... I've been thinking of using Kodak Ultramax 400 to do it. Is there any film that you recomend me to do it with?

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I used Fuji 200 in those shots, but Ultra Max could work just fine, too. 🙂

  • @ethanbrossard5700
    @ethanbrossard5700 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the benefit of this over using a filter?

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Ethan. Well, the benefit is really a matter of opinion, because while both will yield very red results, there are differences. When shooting your film redscale, or just using a red filter (a Hoya R25a for example) it comes down to how the light is recorded on to the film. Each method is going to either absorb, or allow certain wavelengths to pass. Whether that is through a physical filter you place on a lens, or though the layers of film which have filters built into the emulsion (but light passing through them in reverse).
      Basically, it will not look the same, either in the color tonality or how shadow detail is recorded. The best way in my opinion is always testing out each method and seeing what looks good to you. I hope that helps 🙂

  • @Vaclav_Hajek_Z_Libocan
    @Vaclav_Hajek_Z_Libocan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is also possible to do it with black and white film?

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi there. Yes, but the effects are not very dramatic like they are with color film. If you flip black and white film around you'll get a softer image, and it will look like a lite ND filter was used. Hope that helps! 🙂

    • @Vaclav_Hajek_Z_Libocan
      @Vaclav_Hajek_Z_Libocan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filmismorefun Yes, that helped, thanks :)

    • @Vaclav_Hajek_Z_Libocan
      @Vaclav_Hajek_Z_Libocan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I finnaly tried it with some really good results and some not so good. Thank you for manual and I would like to see some more like this :)

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No prob, I'm glad it was helpful! 🙂

  • @lukasrejchrt2128
    @lukasrejchrt2128 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, awesome video. I have one question tho. What if i develop the redscaled film in b&w chemicals. Will it work? Have you tried it? Or you're supposed to develop redscaled films in c41?

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi there. To get the redscale effect it needs to be developed in C41, and you can develop it in BW chemicals, but it does not give as dramatic as an effect on my opinion.

    • @lukasrejchrt2128
      @lukasrejchrt2128 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@filmismorefun Thanks! 😊

  • @bestmoviesever1
    @bestmoviesever1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would this technique work for making a roll twice as long?
    Or would the canister not be able to hold that much film?

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It may hold a few extra shots, but I'd imagine you would most likely fill the container before getting another roll in there. Another issue might be that the spool in the camera may bind up if to much film is around around it.

  • @rafanadhil
    @rafanadhil 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi do you recommend this for a point and shoot camera? I did this to kodak gold 200 but the canister I use is proimage 100 because based on your photos I prefer the look on +1 one, will the camera affect lots of things?? Thanks!!

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi there. If the canister you used has a DX code for 100 ISO it will probably turn out great. If you shoot the rated film speed it usually comes out under exposed, so exposing for a stop or two more is not a bad thing. 🙂

    • @rafanadhil
      @rafanadhil 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@filmismorefun thanks for the reply! My canister has dx code so I guess it'll be nice

  • @marcrodri1030
    @marcrodri1030 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    so if you use a 200 speed you shoot it at 400
    and what about the developing process does it matter or it's just c41 process??

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi there! Well, what you're describing is underexposing. Instead, I would recommend shooting at box speed or over exposing by two stops. For example, if you were shooting 200 speed, you would shoot at iso 50. In my opinion, redscale doesn't look the best if shooting any lower than box speed. (With that said, maybe experiment anyways, because you might prefer it that way). I hope that helps! 🙂

    • @marcrodri1030
      @marcrodri1030 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@filmismorefun coming back to this comment bc i am about to try it
      would you recomend shooting it at 100 speed because the example in your video was cooler that the one shot in 50

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, I would recommend going with whatever you think looks the coolest. It's really about experimenting, and you'll know after a few rolls what iso and brands you personally prefer when redscaling 🙂

    • @marcrodri1030
      @marcrodri1030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filmismorefun alright thanks man

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No prob!

  • @santiagovidela9246
    @santiagovidela9246 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So you're not supposed to push your film when processing, right? You should just over-expose your film

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi there. Actually, yes, normally when over/under exposing your film, you adjust the processing times longer or shorter to compensate for the change in iso speed.
      However, you can also shoot at box speed, and over/under develop while processing the film to achieve different results in the shadows or highlights. And as you mentioned- over/under exposing but not changing the processing times is another possiblity as well to manipulate the highlights and shadows.
      The most typical thing when under or over exposing, though, is to change your processing times to compensate for your change in iso speed essentially "pushing" or "pulling" the box speed to a different one.
      I hope that helps! 🙂

    • @santiagovidela9246
      @santiagovidela9246 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@filmismorefun Super! However, what I'd like to know specifically is if the images you used as examples for over-exposing redscale in the video were push-processed or simply over-exposed and processed at box speed.

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@santiagovidela9246 Oh! Those examples were all using box speed processing. 🙂

    • @santiagovidela9246
      @santiagovidela9246 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filmismorefun great! Thank you very much!

  • @davidkachel
    @davidkachel ปีที่แล้ว

    Is THIS is the kind of nonsense that new film photographers are supposedly interested in doing?!! Film is difficult to use and making a decent print from a film capture is much, much harder, still. A person interested in silly gimmicks and wasting materials probably knows he can't make a decent photograph and therefore ends up doing something like this. Just find something else to do.

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh , I see! You're one of those entitled assholes who think they are the king pompa of film photography. I'm going to go redscale three rolls of film right now in your honor have a great day. Hugs and kisses XOXO.

    • @davidkachel
      @davidkachel ปีที่แล้ว

      @@filmismorefun I have no interest whatsoever in what YOU do with your film. But please, stop misleading new photographers with this nonsense. What you are suggesting others do has nothing at all to do with photography. You couldn't be doing any more damage if you were telling them to eat their film, which you will no doubt do, sooner or later.

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@davidkachel Jokes aside my friend, there are a lot of people who are interested in alternative processing and experimental analog photography. No disrespect, but just because you don't have an interest in it doesn't mean there aren't plenty of people who do.
      I'm not doing any "damage" by posting a DIY technique. Those who want to shoot experimental images will. It's usually because they've mastered the basics and want to try something new and interesting. To each their own.

    • @davidkachel
      @davidkachel ปีที่แล้ว

      @@filmismorefun It is beyond difficult to learn to make good images. Far too many people end up doing what you are doing... playing with cutesy gimmicks and nonsense, instead of doing the hard work of making photographs worth seeing. Go off on all the pointless tangents you like, but don't lead other people down that path, too.

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidkachel It's not up to you who does and doesn't try whatever experimental process they want.
      I see that making this information available to people concerns you, but it really shouldn't I'm my opinion. We're all doing this photography thing to have fun.

  • @HaHa-oy9kv
    @HaHa-oy9kv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi man. Im new to film here just wanna ask ya smthing on terms here.
    When you mentioned overexpose 2 stop( let say the original boxspeed of the film is 400), does you mean it was shot at 100?
    Im sorry im still confused to understanding the overexpose and underexpose terms on film photography 🙏🏼
    But again lovex3 ya video here.🫶🏻

    • @filmismorefun
      @filmismorefun  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep you got it!
      Overexposing 2 stops would be 100 iso if shooting a box speed film of 400 iso.
      400 > 200 > 100 iso

    • @HaHa-oy9kv
      @HaHa-oy9kv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@filmismorefun thnks man🙌🏻🙌🏻🫶🏻