ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Critique of Capitalism | Nancy Fraser
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ส.ค. 2024
- After a period of relative neglect, theorists are again taking up the critique of capitalism. Responding to the metastasizing crises of neoliberalism (financial, economic, ecological, political and social) and to the crumbling of the center-left-cum-center-right political hegemony that underpinned it, many are now returning to the concerns of Marx. But today’s theories of capitalism do not simply repeat earlier critiques of political economy. At their best, they incorporate the hard-won fruits of subsequent intellectual and political developments, including feminism, anti-racism, postcolonialism, and ecology. In this course, we interrogate some of the most important critiques of capitalism, both old and new. The aim is to assess their respective capacities to clarify the capitalism of 21st century. The larger aim is to develop a critical theory of capitalist society that is sufficiently expansive to encompass the gamut of contemporary modes of domination and social struggles, while disclosing their shared bases in a single overarching social order with a determinate institutional structure. The result should also serve to clarify what Marx called “the struggles and wishes of the age,” including the prospects for an emancipatory resolution of the current crisis.
Institute for Critical Social Inquiry | www.criticalso...
Nancy Fraser is Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor at the New School for Social Research, Visiting Research Professor at Dartmouth College, and holder of an international research chair at the Collège d’études mondiales, Paris. Trained as a philosopher, she specializes in critical social theory and political philosophy. Her newest book, Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory, co-authored with Rahel Jaeggi, was published by Polity Press in 2018. She has theorized capitalism’s relation to democracy, racial oppression, social reproduction, ecological crisis, and feminist movements in a series of linked essays in New Left Review and Critical Historical Studies, and in Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis (2013). Previous books include Domination et anticipation: pour un renouveau de la critique, with Luc Boltanski (2014); Transnationalizing the Public Sphere (2014); Scales of Justice (2008); Adding Insult to Injury: Nancy Fraser Debates her Critics (2008); Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (2003) with Axel Honneth; Justice Interruptus (1997); and Unruly Practices (1989). Fraser’s work has been translated into more than twenty languages and was cited twice by the Brazilian Supreme Court (in decisions upholding marriage equality and affirmative action). She is the recipient of 6 honorary degrees and was recently awarded the Nessim Habif World Prize, the Havens Center Lifetime Award for Contribution to Critical Scholarship, and the status of “Chevalier” of the French Legion of Honor. Nancy Fraser is also a past President of the American Philosophical Association, Eastern Division.
THE NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH | newschool.edu/nssr
June 10-12, 2019
63 5th Avenue, Tishman Auditorium
New York, NY 10003
4:30 PM-6:00 PM
I would concur with Professor Fraser's conclusions regarding the status quo if only she expressed an understanding that the problem is not the private ownership of "the means of production" but the private ownership of nature, which is the source of all that we consider tangible, material wealth. We are victimized by systems of law and taxation created and protected by a privileged rentier elite. We in the United States need to trace the origins of our laws back to those inherited from the Old World, laws modified but in almost all essential aspects preserved as brought into being by landed aristocracies and monopolist forces during the period of industrialization and financialization of economies. The pre-industrial system of agrarian landlordism never disappeared; it merely evolved over time into agrarian-commercial-industrial and financial landlordism. All of the circumstances described by Professor Fraser would improve IF only the rents of nature, which are unearned to the individual or the private entity, were collected and used to pay for public goods and services (as urged by a long list of thoughtful analysts going back to Richard Cantillon) and, potentially, a citizen's dividend as proposed by Thomas Paine in "Agrarian Justice." Societies that have established state-socialism have consistently ignored rents altogether as a potential source of public revenue, under-utilizing or simply wasting land and natural resources. This is a lesson that must be learned by any society hoping to establish democratic socialism or social democracy.
Edward J. Dodson, Director
School of Cooperative Individualism
www.cooperative-individualism.org
Social democracies (e.g in Europe) have proven to be the best of all economic and political experiments in recent history. The trick is to balance freedom and responsibility.
Well regulated capitalism in a democratic society = Social democracy
B
59:21 We could use the Internet and block chain tech.
The only place where capitalism doesn't work is in college football.The same teams win year after year.Why bother to watch?