Breakthrough in renewable energy - VPRO documentary

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 1.9K

  • @vprodocumentary
    @vprodocumentary  5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    NEWS NEWS NEWS! We have a vpro documentary, Telegram channel! Check it out for new uploads, spread the word and join! 😉
    t.me/vpro_documentary

    • @antonmursid3505
      @antonmursid3505 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Antonmursid🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💝✌🙌👌👋🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💝✌🙌👌👋

  • @maxpesh
    @maxpesh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I live in Tenerife, one of the islands next to El Hierro and the amount of solar panels here and wind turbines has exploded in the last few years, it's a great time to be alive. Great Documentary !

    • @osopolarmovies
      @osopolarmovies 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I also live in Tenerife and the system in El Hierro was supposed to make the island 100% ecological. However 60% of the electrical energi there is produced from oil.

    • @loginssuckx3
      @loginssuckx3 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bad calculations? I guess they need to double the size of the system. Pretty straightfoward to do.

  • @Fair.D
    @Fair.D 6 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I am so proud for working in solar energy industry, for our meaningful work. We saw the EPC cost of Per watt from 10 dollars down to 0.8 dollars, this make the solar power cheaper than thermal power, deeply touched by this video.

    • @richardstevens3478
      @richardstevens3478 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s a bunch of crap ‼️

    • @TopZBtv
      @TopZBtv 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm starting in the solar energy industry do, you have any tips on learning more info about solar energy?

    • @kennethheying7845
      @kennethheying7845 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tell that to, the poor people who slave labor to produce the raw earth material to make you green energy. Now they live in a wasteland of polluted earth.

  • @ericpmoss
    @ericpmoss 7 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Excellent video! I would add one thing... the thought (~ 19:00) that America's problem is that government changes every few years isn't quite complete. It's that campaign finance here is absolutely corrupt. With few exceptions, the elected representatives' campaigns are being primarily funded by big money, and they listen to their donors, not the science, and not the people.

    • @selah71
      @selah71 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not Bernie Sanders. His campaign is solely funded by private citizens. Please check him out. He's definitely for phasing out fossil fuels and much more that is good.
      Peace

    • @colingenge9999
      @colingenge9999 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@selah71 fazing means not affected. Think you meant "phasing". Words matter.

    • @selah71
      @selah71 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@colingenge9999
      I agree words matter. Thank you very much and the misspell has been corrected.

    • @samsonian
      @samsonian 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      LJ Adkins I like Bernie and Elizabeth. They both are willing to openly admit that our system is utterly corrupt and useless. Reading Art. I of the Constitution, you see that the ONLY party ANY member of Congress (either House or Senate) is answerable to is their CONSTITUENTS. In other words, the roughly HALF of each day they spend fundraising for their campaign should be considered THEFT from the taxpayers that voted them into office and they should be immediately impeached, if not imprisoned for political fraud/malfeasance. If we knew all the little BS that goes on with our taxes and in our name we would all have heart attacks...chiefly among those would be knowing that HALF of our collected taxes go toward servicing DEBT under the Fed. Reserve system. We pay 6%(!!) interest on the money they don’t even print...which is especially painful because the Fed is owned and run by foreign banking families with our well-being nowhere near the front of their minds. Further, the IRS is a private institution illegally run with NO legal mandate as the Fed. Reserve Act was never properly ratified and a non-apportioned tax on income is unconstitutional.
      So, if we are to claw our country back into our own clutches so it can work for US taxpayers... not bankers, lawyers (the BAR is a foreign entity as well, the British Attorney Registry that serves the British Empire), lobbyists and especially not OIL COMPANIES!! The fact that oil companies, oil pipeline companies, refiners, etc. are given huge government subsidies...should be SICKENING to those of us that are NOT wealthy and watch as gas/natural gas prices go up at a much higher rate than the cost per barrel would indicate, quickly rising but slowly falling to bleed us dry every week, year and month. When we drive Shell, BP, Chevron, Mobil, Conoco, etc. out of business it will be a joyous day because it will signify no longer damaging our biosphere by continually adding carbon to our atmosphere! Sorry for the long rant, I truly wish we would take renewable energy seriously in the USA...

    • @nortonnewmann3711
      @nortonnewmann3711 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      After Bernie is elected, create a massive push to repeal Citizens United... if ever there was a "corruption enabling" money train, that is the ultimate. As long as politicians can be bought, there will be little change. The levers of control have been taken away from the average working citizen - the MAJORITY! Remove the corrupt purse strings of Citizens United, and we will return to political representation by the people, for the people; NOT by the corporate elitists.

  • @vpheonix
    @vpheonix 8 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    I love the lake and the dam battery storage of energy. You no longer have to rely on the sun shining or wind blowing all the time. You just use the solar and wind power to pump water up to the lake and let the water run out of the lake into a dam to get hydroelectric power. As close as we can get to a perpetual motion machine.

    • @dickhamilton3517
      @dickhamilton3517 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      pumped storage is an old idea which depends on large differences between supply and demand at different times of the day.
      the water is pumped back uphill using off-peak electricity which sells at a low price, due to low demand, while the normal generation gets run at peak demand and can sell its electricity at a high price. You lose about 30% of the energy over the return trip - it is definitely not like perpetual motion... Will it still be worthwhile when there is an abundance of energy and the price differential between peak and off-peak power falls?

    • @vpheonix
      @vpheonix 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Dick Hamilton I think they use renewable energy (wind and solar when it's available) to pump the water. That way they're using the water to store the energy for use when it's needed. This overcomes the disadvantages of renewables, which can be unreliable.

    • @dickhamilton3517
      @dickhamilton3517 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      maybe now (not here, actually), but they've been using pumped storage for decades (here, anyway). It's fine, but not free -

    • @wtfbollos
      @wtfbollos 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      we could use the energy to do all sorts of things. you could haul up a huge concrete weight and use it to drive a generator. you could crack water and make hydrogen to burn when you needed it. they are many ways to store energy without a battery but batteries are evolving very quickly these days and are just going to get better and better.

    • @envirowisenz
      @envirowisenz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes Virgil Pumped Hydro is a great way of storing energy if the geography permits. A great example is the one in Okinawa, Japan, using pumped seawater up to a mountain Reservoir - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okinawa_Yanbaru_Seawater_Pumped_Storage_Power_Station

  • @creatingabetteryou6175
    @creatingabetteryou6175 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Its great to see many countries are taking renewable energy very seriously, especially to the point where fossil fuels are now being seen to be too expensive to produce :)

    • @altond511
      @altond511 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They always were, without massive subsidies.

    • @norwegianzound
      @norwegianzound 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ain't no 'merican gonna touch this devil teeechnologee. We gonna burn God's own blood - OIL! Geddit bubba?

    • @grgmetube
      @grgmetube 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@norwegianzound Burning Gods blood! What animal or human are you needing to take to the alter for sacrifice and appeasement?

    • @bennymarshall1320
      @bennymarshall1320 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They really aren't. What you just saw was a very onesided documentary.

    • @aroganli8625
      @aroganli8625 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Renewable energy!? 🤣 What will u do when those wind blades or sun panels finish their life? Where will u fill them up?

  • @lajwantishahani1225
    @lajwantishahani1225 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bravo! It was very clear from the onset that once the renewable technology proves itself, there will be many converts and champions. So happy to see a corporate banker saying he's excited by the future and having fun. Yes, we are at a turning point. Countries which are ahead in the race to embrace this change are securing their energy resources and therefore economy in the post-fossil fuel world.

    • @vprodocumentary
      @vprodocumentary  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for your positive comment Lajwanti.

  • @philipdamask2279
    @philipdamask2279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where do they consider the cost of batteries to serve base load electricity

  • @victorivchenko
    @victorivchenko 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Brilliant Documentary! It's re-assured my life-long dream of solar and renewable energy autonomy on micro and macro scales.
    Finally it is the dawn of the world's sustainable future, in every sense.

    • @Mike-xi4zt
      @Mike-xi4zt 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brilliant Bull Shitary

  • @andrewysr136
    @andrewysr136 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing video I can't believe there is an island that runs totally off renewable energy and California just essentially through away 190,000 kWh of energy last year. Something has to give soon.

  • @ChrisMichael
    @ChrisMichael 8 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    Fantastic documentary, guys. Very well made. No fluff, no filler, no political tiptoeing: just great reporting. Makes me so happy for the future.

    • @vprodocumentary
      @vprodocumentary  8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      We appreciate your feedback. Thank you for watching!

    • @adamjustus3766
      @adamjustus3766 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lol no political tiptoeing

    • @brooksanderson2599
      @brooksanderson2599 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I needed this after all the negative news from Washington. Thank you.

    • @denniseblunt
      @denniseblunt 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chris Michael I agree

    • @denniseblunt
      @denniseblunt 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      vpro documentary I am blind woman and I am a resusable energy marketer. I work hard I can admire other countries that have always really have had this issue. I understand. Thanks for sharing.

  • @krisrousseau5510
    @krisrousseau5510 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mooi al die duurzame energie, beter voor het klimaat en voor de planeet en dus voor iedereen. Alleen spijtig dat de resultaten ervan voor een groot deel teniet gedaan worden door ons economisch systeem dat toelaat, of beter gezegd vereist dat nog steeds enorme hoeveelheden bos vernielt wordt en zoveel nutteloos transport oplegt. Bijvoorbeeld voeding als vis, vlees en groenten in een land geproduceerd om duizenden kilometers verder geconsumeerd te worden. Of erger nog, voeding wordt duizenden kilometers ver getransporteerd om goedkoop bewerkt te worden en dan weer teruggebracht naar de plaats van oorsprong. Het argument dat alle overbodig transport weghalen teveel arbeidsplaatsen zou kosten is een vals argument, want het volstaat dan om het aantal werkdagen te verminderen om weer het aantal arbeidsplaatsen op peil te brengen. Economisch niet haalbaar? Toch wel indien we naar een economisch model gaan zonder winstbejag. Dit is mogelijk als de meerderheid van de bevolking dit wil, en minder werken voor gelijk of zelf meer loon daar kan toch niemand op tegen zijn.
    Wat in de documentaire getoond wordt is als twee stappen vooruit doen en een achteruit.

  • @sinestatus
    @sinestatus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you very much for uploading these videos with Spanish subtitles.

    • @vprodocumentary
      @vprodocumentary  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for watching Deivid. We are glad to read your comment. :)

  • @AhmedAdly11
    @AhmedAdly11 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is a phenomenal documentary!!! Amazing that I didn't find it before.
    I love the part (32:20) with the explanation of using cars to store power for the area. Amazing concept indeed!!!

    • @teksal13
      @teksal13 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does the car owner have to pay to replace the energy drained from his car to supply the houses?

    • @teksal13
      @teksal13 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does the car owner pay for the energy that is being drained from his car to service homes?

    • @dougmc666
      @dougmc666 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does the car owner have to pay to replace the battery? They are rated by number of cycles.

    • @Nill757
      @Nill757 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nowhere in the world are stock EVs allowed to dump power into a utility grid. It’s another comic book scam.

  • @RuleofFive
    @RuleofFive 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you......good documentary. Its good to see small communities like El Hierro making this commitment and seeing it work. It gives me hope that the oil industry won't destroy the planet.

    • @RuleofFive
      @RuleofFive 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@regenerative-stories It beats letting the planet burn up.

    • @regenerative-stories
      @regenerative-stories 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RuleofFive we all should learn to use energy wisely. have you heard of degrowth?

    • @RuleofFive
      @RuleofFive 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@regenerative-stories I have and from what I know it makes sense. The trouble is it terrifies the financial industry or any other growth oriented business so some don’t take it seriously.

    • @regenerative-stories
      @regenerative-stories 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RuleofFive i normally listen to scientists instead politicians and economists, they say that we will have to degrow in any case, we live in a limited planet. Economists ignore that and politicians trust too much in economists.... i think that we, people, should make that changes that we really need.

    • @RuleofFive
      @RuleofFive 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@regenerative-stories Our problem is massive energy systems make a ton of money for the people that own them. They fight like hell to maintain these systems.

  • @ellinachname9018
    @ellinachname9018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WIND🌬......WASSER🌊.......SONNE 🌞. All together......🙏 and we will survive 👍......the People on Island show it 🙂

  • @hanshyde9108
    @hanshyde9108 8 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    This is sadly depressing from an American perspective where we have "successfully" succeeded in politicizing science, technology, energy and economics.

    • @Dana5775
      @Dana5775 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hans Hyde It is not too late!

    • @MrZoomZone
      @MrZoomZone 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Totally agree same in the UK. If anyone thinks not then please say why, it will cheer me up a lot.

    • @roberthicks1612
      @roberthicks1612 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      IF mmcc was actually science, and it was a danger, wouldn't people spend 100k to fix the problem? That's all it would have taking in 1979, a single 100k investment would have resulted in a hydrogen based economy.

    • @roberthicks1612
      @roberthicks1612 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      IF that is true why are we not running the entire world the way Russia tried to do and china is trying to do now. Even the Muslim religion is trying to dictate to the world how it will live. So if the us is the great satan, why haven't we already taken over the world?

    • @ezioauditore5616
      @ezioauditore5616 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@roberthicks1612 800 military bases around the world, less than 200 countries

  • @sprit4212
    @sprit4212 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    👍👍👍👍
    All the best for Future sticks project

  • @citycommutersclubcarpoolin6219
    @citycommutersclubcarpoolin6219 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent .. You well articulated current state of renewables, these should be self evident to detached observer without even an explanation.

  • @hvodinh
    @hvodinh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is the best documentary on renewable energy, by far. Thank you!

  • @universalenergynetwork8061
    @universalenergynetwork8061 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The time has definitely arrived to implement renewable energy projects globally. Identification of storage systems to compliment existing PV tech systems is vital at this point. The shift is upon us.

  • @davidmotyka4832
    @davidmotyka4832 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The whole Earth needs this.

  • @froztbytes
    @froztbytes 8 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    13:11
    "I have a feeling that smog levels have exploded the past few years"
    me: YA' THINK?
    What was your first clue?

    • @jackhackman7777
      @jackhackman7777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The goverments been lieing about pullution all these years and now they want to tell you still to this day they don't belive pullution or the ice isn't melting don't belive a fucking thing they tell you there all liers

  • @dougmc666
    @dougmc666 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The stats for 2016 show wind supplying 4% and solar supplying 1% and it requires expensive storage to ever get beyond their power factor of 15%. The really big growth has been natural gas, which is also the number one choice to backup renewables.

  • @thesoultraderd413
    @thesoultraderd413 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A brilliant documentary! It covers pretty much all the economics and politics of renewable versus fossils fueled energy.

    • @vprodocumentary
      @vprodocumentary  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Jenkins Dagba!

    • @Obscurai
      @Obscurai 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vprodocumentary For a 3 year old documentary, it is still quite relevant and accurate.

  • @sunshine7453
    @sunshine7453 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Chinese are blamed as the number 1 polluter in the world. But their contribution to clean and renewable energy are far more than they are credited for. Solar cell was invented in the 50's but was not useful because it was too expensive for 40 years because it costs almost a dollar per KW. The Chinese came later in the 90's and bought the price down 20 times that make solar power possible. They did contribute immensely in wind turbine making it very affordable. There are hundred of ways to generate energy but at what cost. Now solar is compatible with the fossil generators.

  • @SteveLamberts
    @SteveLamberts 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you, highly informative. It shows what people can do when there are no walls.

  • @hfortenberry
    @hfortenberry 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OMG, that guy in the Netherlands who is combining solar panels with car batteries is a GENIUS!! What a wonderful idea! I am LOVING this! I wish we did that in the States.

    • @evangelinewuennemann9560
      @evangelinewuennemann9560 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Best batteries to start are golf cart batteries, but that was in the 70's. Tesla uses a battery to store power now. But that's big bucks,

  • @matsnjp1033
    @matsnjp1033 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The most terrible is that Spain do NOT allow solar energy ... Costa del Sol, wth 320 sunny days ... NOT ALLOWED TO INSTALL SOLAR PANELS on private houses ... HORRIBLE!!!

    • @vintageb8
      @vintageb8 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @SolarizeYourLife
      @SolarizeYourLife 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hell, we still have, gated communities and homeowner associations, being built with no solar considered or allowed, talk about closed minded. But, Mats, that is most bazaar thing I ever heard, can't understand such idiotacy!

    • @rodrigosouto9502
      @rodrigosouto9502 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks to spanish government... and this is why the country economics is growing: they are without gov for some months

    • @loginssuckx3
      @loginssuckx3 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      In Spain the utility companies control the Rajoy government through bribery.

    • @ab0032
      @ab0032 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's because the Spanish government is not stupid, they don't fall for these lies. And you can install solar, you just have to pay your taxes. We all have to pay taxes on oil too, so that is only fair.

  • @luci75d76
    @luci75d76 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Good documentary! I like the guy at the end : I delay my retirement with 2 years because Iam having so much fun now ! Good point !

  • @ouvickie
    @ouvickie 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video. I'm sharing with my friends and social media groups. Thank you!!!

  • @zodiacfml
    @zodiacfml 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice. A topic close to me, energy and the Middle East. Once again, the Middle East is lucky for energy generation making the location ideal for solar energy. The oil companies shouldn't fear renewable energy, oil is essential for manufacturing. All they have to do is reduce volume to keep the profit they are used to.

  • @cavendish009
    @cavendish009 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Where do you get ALL THE LAND needed for all these solar panels ?? HOW MANY BIRDS ARE KILLED?? Where can we grow FOOD FOR PEOPLE ??

  •  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So, it will be four years in May since this documentary was posted. Does the exceptionally low cost claim for solar energy at this solar-panel farm still stand? If not, at were does its claims stand now? We live in Tennessee at a latitude of 35.5 degrees. With a modest 1,600 square foot house with air conditioning, how many panels will we need? What size are the panels?

  • @SailingLearningByDoing
    @SailingLearningByDoing 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Awesome documentary guys, thanks for making it. A real positive outlook on whats become a rather depressing theme.

  • @windowtintpro8886
    @windowtintpro8886 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great, informative video, thank you. There is hope that Solar & Wind Energy will continue to expand.

    • @vprodocumentary
      @vprodocumentary  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You are welcome! We are happy you liked this video. Feel free to wach more and to sucscribe to our channeld for more documentaries.

    • @guillaumefrancois6231
      @guillaumefrancois6231 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please tell me what is the music at the beginning? I would be very pleased!

    • @robpeacock2780
      @robpeacock2780 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      crane accidents

  • @barbaramazer2093
    @barbaramazer2093 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent documentary; uplifting yet down to earth, quite wide-ranging in its analysis.

    • @VeganV5912
      @VeganV5912 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Barbara Mazer 🐄💨💩💩💩 51% Cows. Scientific fact.
      ‘Me explaining how you can still build muscle on a plant based diet’ says the Gorilla 🦍❤️💪✅...
      th-cam.com/video/wHUiiz03LL4/w-d-xo.html . Go vegan ✅please😂
      90% poop, that’s right POOP💩🐮💩🍔🥩🥓🍗🍖🌭🍕🥪🍤🍣💩🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮(actual pictures). Science rules. That’s the science 🧬. 10 minutes, please watch everything.
      th-cam.com/video/AkWd0R05ZEs/w-d-xo.html . Actual pictures, Child and adult. Massive study. It’s what you eat, hint hint ✅✅✅❤️👏😬.
      th-cam.com/video/JepHGvL00LI/w-d-xo.html . Lower back Clogged. Actual pictures.
      LDL (IDEAL = 70) Omnivore: 123 🧟‍♂️🍖. Vegetarian: 87 😐🧀🍳🥛. Vegan: 69 ✅❤️👏😬🌎. I know because I had a stroke, eating meat and cheese and fish and milk. Hard arteries 🧟‍♂️🍖. Three months in hospital 🏥. But now I’m vegan ✅. Smooth arteries. Scientific fact. And I don’t stink anymore. Clean and fresh every day !!! I didn’t know this !!! 👏✅🤗👕🥾🧦✅👏
      th-cam.com/video/BTD-BBuWYY4/w-d-xo.html . Shaolin Kung Fu 🥋, fast quick💨. ‘Vegans’ ✅👏❤️.
      Poor little animal, They didn’t do anything wrong. They’re innocent. Purely innocent 😇. You make someone else do it 😈🔪🐷🔴🍖🧟‍♂️, that’s a coward !!! That’s Evil !
      Change as a person. Grow up.
      Help the planet and the animals ✅🤗🐮🐷🐣🐙🐟.... . TH-cam Delicious vegan ✅ food ! No guilt. Win win situation 🌍✅❤️🤗👏
      Like the masses, follow the leader, Cult 🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖🧟‍♂️🍖........
      What is this please. 10 minute. Your change your mind ✅
      th-cam.com/video/gNV26q89zYg/w-d-xo.html . Holocaust Survivor, 🛤🏯⛓😵🐮🐷🐣...✅

  • @hora1509
    @hora1509 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s now or never to switch to alternative, sustainable and renewable energy. Indeed, great plan and achievement from the Chinese that will change everything in a positive way; giving mother Earth a chance to thrive and scale up towards a cleaner and safer future. Thank you for this documentary, very much appreciated and this switch to renewable affordable energy is so urgently necessary in our escalating polluted world.

    • @woxnerw
      @woxnerw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Be practicable, Everyone.. Solar and Wind Energy can NEVER compete with Fossil Energy, no matter how cheap it becomes.. The sun never shines on one place on the EARTH 50% of the time.. Forget about the wind.. DO YOU know how much Carbon Energy is required to manufacture Solar and Wind Hardware? The only people who supports this kind of energy are the people who stand to make money from this.. You never hear about how much Carbon is produced in the Manufacture of this Hardware.. We would have been better off it Hitler would have won WWII.. Energy should be FREE to every inhabitant on the Face of the Earth Do you know how much Produce can be grown on a Field full of SOLAR Panels? Why do They use Females to "VOICE OVER" Video Clips of PRO Natural Energy Production??

  • @tarshmateus9411
    @tarshmateus9411 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing! Renewable energy NOW! This is brilliant! Politicians have no excuses now!

    • @rolfgerig9829
      @rolfgerig9829 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Those stupid politicians persist globally, let's vote them out of power while we can!

  • @gursimranjitsingh7007
    @gursimranjitsingh7007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just AMAZING !!! Very interesting documentary.

  • @MalteDegener
    @MalteDegener 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Super interesting, really well-made documentary - I highly enjoyed!

    • @susan638
      @susan638 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't enjoy documentaries that are made by the New World Order. They are responsible for crimes against humanity in 2020. They should be held accountable for their fabricated lies and their man-made viruses that are being used to line their pockets with billions of dollars. Why? Klaus Schwab = Dr. Evil. Shove your sustainable energy and your new green deal that hurts the middle class and helps the one per cent. You are all a bunch of psychopaths. Satan loves you.

    • @MalteDegener
      @MalteDegener 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@susan638 You really need to see someone.

    • @seanswader2124
      @seanswader2124 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MalteDegener well that was kind of mean-spirited you don't work for Google do you, if not I'd like to debate you on a few of @Susan's Points I CHALLENGE YOU!

  • @mollyred896
    @mollyred896 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    such an interesting video

  • @PoliticFlix
    @PoliticFlix 8 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I can't believe anyone would dislike this video. They must be big oil and gas.

    • @jmac4952
      @jmac4952 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Head scratcher...

    • @williamwallace176
      @williamwallace176 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I can't believe anyone would believe this STORY.

    • @jona_KardCiv1
      @jona_KardCiv1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Because they are lying. Badly. It,s 2 years since the video was made. Their numbers are way off on price..

    • @magyararon6918
      @magyararon6918 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Oil and Gas companies heavily support solar&wind because thats two is a totally failed technology, and will never be able to supply enough energy to us no matter how much money they wasting on the technology. Thats why German's co2 emission barely shrunk, while in other countries like france just using nuclear with much less co2 emission. Germany failed very-very hard, its time to realize, and restart nuclear research and investments.

    • @guarddog318
      @guarddog318 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's because the whole story is political bullshit.
      The earth's climate always changes. So stop worrying about that, and just develop sound energy technology.
      The planet will take care of it's self. ( Even if it has to thin us down to do it. )

  • @rolandshelley5165
    @rolandshelley5165 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The ideas at the end are pure genius!

  • @DAVET0NE
    @DAVET0NE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    fantastic documentary! feeling inspired and hopeful for the world

  • @matzekruger3373
    @matzekruger3373 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2020 solar power price in southern europe: 2.4 ct/kWh.

  • @duomas
    @duomas 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    excellent documentary, big thanks!

    • @Krupnoklipac
      @Krupnoklipac 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      After solar, ITER kicks in.

  • @troyhayder6986
    @troyhayder6986 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How's this for a breakthrough
    gravity generator...
    Its obvious is obvious it would work
    Skyscraper made out of multi layered glass.. Swimming pool at the bottom... Metal cap.. Micro earth climate inside... Water evaporates.... Rises.. Condenses on the conical roof... Drops into a funnel... Powers turbines... Repeats process... Heavy insulation at the base to make sure the water stays hot... Works better in warm climates...
    Or my other idea
    Sea web
    Interconnected bouys connected to four other bouys in a massive lattice... As the sea swells the bouys move up and down and so do the arms creating electricity...

    • @racebannon5523
      @racebannon5523 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You thought of both of those? Wow you must be a genius.

  • @larkinsantoyo119
    @larkinsantoyo119 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was very straight forward and informative. A bit bias but good;), thank you for sharing. It motivates more and more to continue studying renewable energy and natural resources.

  • @hectorkeezy1499
    @hectorkeezy1499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The stabilisation of the energy supply, will be a huge stabilizing factor, for the World as a whole. Think of all the wars, that has been fought over energy. El Hiero is amazing. A great example to be followed.

  • @anthonykorangi9952
    @anthonykorangi9952 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Eye opening, will share, thanks!!

  • @jack76787
    @jack76787 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this incredible documentary.

  • @ravindersembi3955
    @ravindersembi3955 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    excellent documentary

  • @parthasmukherjee4774
    @parthasmukherjee4774 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Documentary! An EYE OPENER!

  • @JJs_playground
    @JJs_playground 8 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    this was a great documentary.

    • @vprodocumentary
      @vprodocumentary  8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you! Don't forget to subscribe to our channel we will release one every week.

    • @PaulAndHarris
      @PaulAndHarris 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      vpro documentary -- Holy crap this is an amazing documentary. However, it seems to end rather abruptly; no credits or anything. Is there a part 2??

    • @clintonrodriguez1867
      @clintonrodriguez1867 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *42,119 people are already using the DIY Home Energy Systemmmm>> **facebook.com/DIY-Home-Energy-1607656416206247/?sk=app_337680106275807** >>>*

    • @k1m625
      @k1m625 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You should watch Tony Seba.....The clean disruption......way more detail and really eye opening

    • @kerryfranklin2833
      @kerryfranklin2833 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      B

  • @MegaDerek1975
    @MegaDerek1975 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Spread the word and save this world. Every human being on this planet should be able to live in a clean environment, that includes clean provisions and clean water. We can do this, so start lobbying for what really matters renewable energy. We would be stupid not to do so.

  • @winstonmaraj8029
    @winstonmaraj8029 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I can't stop listening to this docu.

    • @vprodocumentary
      @vprodocumentary  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Have you seen that Germany just managed to create 85% of its energy from renewables?
      This is happening!

    • @winstonmaraj8029
      @winstonmaraj8029 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No I havent.But is that figure a real one or a play with numbers?

    • @vprodocumentary
      @vprodocumentary  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      futurism.com/germany-just-smashed-an-energy-record-generating-85-electricity-from-renewables/
      Look for yourself!

  • @paulkaragiannis5879
    @paulkaragiannis5879 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    GREAT foresight guys, it is now finally well under way

  • @WebsterHelios
    @WebsterHelios 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This gives me so much hope for the future.

    • @rickbernsKY
      @rickbernsKY 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then you need a shrink.

    • @mind9528
      @mind9528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      me too! 🙂

  • @pedrogloria1851
    @pedrogloria1851 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very important and revealing information. Are there any subtitles for this video? Portuguese?

  • @natashadyer1993
    @natashadyer1993 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

  • @michele-oe8pg
    @michele-oe8pg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    SARS COVID-2 has been decide on that very day!!! my personal hypothesis!!! let repeat it HYPOTHESIS MY DEAR VIEWERS!

    • @susan638
      @susan638 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't enjoy documentaries that are made by the New World Order. They are responsible for crimes against humanity in 2020. They should be held accountable for their fabricated lies and their man-made viruses that are being used to line their pockets with billions of dollars. In the documentary they admit that China is leading the push for sustainable energy and the new NWO green deal that hurts the middle class and helps the 1 per cent. So the CCP psychopaths are behind this climate change scheme. Thank you for admitting your guilt. Satan loves you! 🐍

  • @paulhendrix8599
    @paulhendrix8599 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That was great. Thanks.

  • @murderdoggg
    @murderdoggg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    27:19 They short-sold the stocks of the competition. That shows pride in their product.
    Edit: The host resembles Bill Nein.

  • @jamesp9692
    @jamesp9692 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome, very informative documentary. I have been a big fan of renewable energy for the last 20 years, I new the only reason it was not more advanced and accepted was because of big oil and coal. I am so glad to see this trend moving on a world-wide scale.

  • @tibetannomad2483
    @tibetannomad2483 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice documentary, the inflection point has been crossed. However the key is also to get the likes of Tesla to bring storage costs down and the use of fossil fuels will all but be eliminated. Great to watch this video if you are hoping for a better future for your children.

  • @crashroots
    @crashroots 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    very cool movie! thank you :-)

  • @chopper421
    @chopper421 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful work as always greetings from california

  • @dinizen
    @dinizen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    25:27 vertical video recorder spotted.

    • @zaboomafia
      @zaboomafia 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Bad video camera operator!

    • @0thepyat0
      @0thepyat0 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Really? After watching this video, that's all you have to say about it???

    • @PenisMcWhirtar
      @PenisMcWhirtar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No, look at what he does at 26:51 - that will be one fucked up home video, ladies! (´◉◞౪◟◉)

    • @bgkdiver1313
      @bgkdiver1313 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PenisMcWhirtar yep i was thinking the same thing... there idiots always recording everything. not able to grasp the concept of whats being said in the moment...

    • @PenisMcWhirtar
      @PenisMcWhirtar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probably in charge of multi-million budgets and hundreds om employees too - scary LOL!!!

  • @alfredhitchcock45
    @alfredhitchcock45 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sana sa Pinas ganyan din dumami solar and wind para clean energy. Di natin kailangan ng factories or coal.

  • @wlhgmk
    @wlhgmk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Part of the low price depends on something around 5 hours of peak power equivalent per day. To a first approximation, if you only have 2.5 hours of peak power per day, the price per kWh would be twice as much.

    • @videoloopproject
      @videoloopproject 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      exactly it can only be done in the desert

  • @alish2852
    @alish2852 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    FANTASTIC. A VERY USEFULL BROGRAM.

  • @FrenchieGrignon
    @FrenchieGrignon 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you for the documentary, really informative for our future project.

  • @gerardvaughan1847
    @gerardvaughan1847 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It stunned me, around 2000, having devoted some 12 years to the pursuit of the possibility of a self sustaining Wind energy system, when I started to
    look at the cost of the two essential
    parts - The Turbine, and the Alternator, or electrical half- of a "Turbine" i.e. a wind Turbine-Alternator device - TAD.
    First I saw that making the Turbine Smaller was Always a cost advantage because the weight (cost) decreased like Volume, but the ammount of wind
    " processed" decreased as Area.
    This seemed insane ! As one guy said, " we will have them on rings on our
    fingers, or on our hat's !? It was not for about a year that I started looking at the costs of various generators/Alternators and noticed that smaller was More cost/ watt. Bingo ! Eureka ! the insanity was cured, and it was soon "obvious" that the lowest Total cost was for sizes where the two halves cost about the same.
    When starting out, cost v size is a question that never crossed my mind. It arrived near the End of about 3 designs from which I gained actual watts, and data.
    It is a completely unavoidable fact of Any T+A combo. No matter what.
    So one must look at these Windfarm "Turbines", and ask oneself, " how do the costs of the T and the Electrical half compare?"
    I really cannot believe that their costs are anywhere near equal, but have not attempted to obtain figures, other than these.
    From a public meeting at Llandeilo, July/August 2005, I gathered the following:
    Cost of proposed farm...153M
    Expected annual income ...0.2M
    That's over 500 years to regain the energy invested in it, for those not familiar with simple arithmetic.
    it does not Have to be like this !.
    An annual return of 5-15%? of the energy required to create the system appears possible with a design which does not ignore elementary mathematics, such as Area, and Volume - as does current Gigantic "technology".
    A turbine of Twice the diameter, replaces 4 previous, but costs 8 times as much for materials (Area becomes 2 squared, Volume, 2 cubed x what it was).
    The One Alternator, however, (to replace the 4) costs only about Twice as much as any one of them. So the A-bill halves if we double the diameter of the "TAD"s, and use 1/4 as many, i.e.same size "farm", whilst the T-bill Doubles.
    The Total cost, of T+A, can be seen to be minimum for sizes where the T and the A cost about the same. Now by some remarkable piece of Cosmic serendipity ?, that size is neither a mile across - nor an inch across - but just happens to be a very convenient, man handleable, 0.5 to 1.5? m across. It is hard to justify building them much outside of this range, on economic grounds.
    Also, the bigger the diameter, the wider is the range of wind speeds from top to bottom, ("wind shear"), so it is not possible for the Pitch to accomodate all of these, making a mockery of accuracy of the pitch setting, and aerodynamic perfection of the wing !
    Secondly there are Two possible modes of operation.
    a) Constant Revs/min and vary the pitch of the "blades" (- which need to be Wings, of course !)
    b) Keep the Pitch Constant , and adjust the load so that the Rotor turns at a speed correct for the air passing through.
    i.e.
    2.Pi.r.n (the speed of the piece of Wing at some radius, r) needs to be = w.Tan(P) (in both systems).
    w is windspeed.
    n is rev/second P is pitch at radius r, measured so that 0 degrees = Edgeways-on to the wind.
    Now although the torque (T) will be the sum of all the pushes x all the radii along the wing, I will consider just one bit of the wing. This is ok since it will affect only the Size, Magnitude, of the "answer", and we are concerned only with the Shape of the expression, or "answer", wrt windspeed.
    If we look at the first one, we can get an expression for power into shaft, from each little length of wing.
    i.e. 2.Pi.r.n. x useful component of that bit of wing's "lift".
    n is (rev/sec) which is constant. Call it 1 unit.
    Leaving out constants for the above reason, because they don't affect the shape, but simply confuse,
    The speed of the wing is fixed at 1 unit
    From pythagoras triangle Wingspeed (1) windspeed (w) speed over wing - hypotenuse - is
    Sqrt(1 + w^2)
    So lift force is (1 + w^2)
    and its useful component - in direction of travel of wing - is
    Lift.Cos(p) which is (1 + w^2) . w/Sqrt(1 + w^2)
    do the power put into the slternator shaft will be 1 x this, for each bit of wing, will vary with windspeed in accordance with the expression,
    P = w.Sqrt(1 + w^2)
    At low winds, w is a lot less than the 1 of the wingspeed, so the relationship is pretty much a direct, linear, "twice the windspeed, twice the power into the shaft", type/variety. It rises a little above "straight", at high winds, towards a w^2 curve.
    Now taking the other posibility, the airspeed over any bit of wing will be proportional to w, since although both wing and wind speeds double if the wind doubles, the two add by Pythagoras, being at rt angles.
    Lift (the useful) force is proportional to w^2, and therefore so is the torque applied to the shaft. Since power is (2.Pi) x revs x torque (push x radius at which the push is applied) the power transmitted by the shaft is proportional to w^3, i.e. k times the wind gives k^3 times the power, e.g. Twice the wind, 8 times the power into shaft.
    So this is obviously the system to adopt if at all possible. And - unless you have your alternator running at constant speed - 50 Hz synchronous - like "windfarms", it is perfectly possible.
    N.B. !
    If however you DO have the alternator running at fixed speed, and you decide to use gearing to increase the rotor speed - thereby moving towards operation mode 2) - the extra Torque becomes proportional to w^2, instead of w, this creates w^2 current in the copper, and since heating is proportional to current^2, the heating of the copper in the alternator is prop.to w^4 - which causes it to cut-out - or burn-out - during a heavy gust, or contunuous high winds.
    So the Aternator Cannot be run synchronous for a TAD to have any chance of paying for itself in a lifetime.
    Next there is the fact that the bigger the Rotor, the greater difference in wind speeds over the entire swept area
    This renders any "aero-precision" in its manufacture a total waste of effort !!!
    Meanwhile, the tiny hubs serve only to create a "materials/engineering" problem !!
    So, to sumarize,
    1) There exists a SIZE giving lowest cost/kW-hr
    2) The TAD needs to run at windspeed, not fixed speed, to make full use of the energy available in any given wind.
    There is also the consideration of "Churning", or "turbulence" caused by pseudo-random airflow through a "helicopter on its side " sort of device. "Air friction". This can be eliminated in the turbine itself by carefully designed, matching, pre, and post-fan "Ducts".
    I can send the design for this to anyone interested, so that they can check the reasoning. I can vouch that the prototype performs as hoped/expected. It delivers a full 50% of the total k.e. of the wind as useable energy.

  • @ddd228
    @ddd228 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    But the ways to STORE the energy is still lacking.I use lead acid batteries.I need more of them.My wind turbine is small and works best in the fall and winter.Solar is working during the day and charging my batteries.

    • @ddd228
      @ddd228 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      *****
      That's GREAT news!
      Maybe I can use BOTH type,when the time comes.
      Thanks for the post!
      Dave in Seattle.

    • @wtfbollos
      @wtfbollos 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you can store energy in any one of a number of ways. they even showed you one in the video (did you watch it?). pump water up hill in windy and sunny days and let it flow down to drive generators. they said in the documentary that on that island, the water was good for 4 days of energy use.

  • @ph11p3540
    @ph11p3540 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The final magic bullet for insuring large scale use of renewable energy is mass energy storage. Scientists and grid engineers have really struggled with with part of the renewable energy and it looks like the technology has finally maturing.

    • @whatamarvel3636
      @whatamarvel3636 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Phillip Mulligan it is and it's very exciting :)

  • @rajjysrachid7258
    @rajjysrachid7258 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    But i don't get why all these companies and investors are not backing up Tesla and other electric companies to extend the market no only on Sedans but on bigger structures that run on electricity rather than oil. Beside i want also the opinion from oil producers about this energy shift

    • @hanshyde9108
      @hanshyde9108 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The difference being Tesla/Solar City operating in the US market system where everyone is more concerned about what money they can make in contrast to what benefits can be achieved through societal systems. To do what they are doing in The Netherlands example, data related to energy consumption & production has to be a 2-way street, something that is acceptable to many outside the US, but inside the US, it's a no-go.

    • @denniseblunt
      @denniseblunt 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      jonathan Rachid each bussiness is it's own.

    • @brooksanderson2599
      @brooksanderson2599 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Texas politicians have gotten a ban on retrailing Teslas in Texas. Who says that we dont have the best politicians money can buy? Now, does anybudy want to back my buggy making company?

  • @earthwizz
    @earthwizz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Judging by the rash of bankruptcies across the coal industry, we've already reached the tipping point. As the Saudi Minister for oil said when he flagged the end of oil in 2000, "The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stone."

    • @earthwizz
      @earthwizz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @MoralSingularity Not a lot of coal there and you might like to think about all the ecosystems killed by the fossil fuel industry generally and the massive death toll globally from pollution.

  • @markchamberlin8987
    @markchamberlin8987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is there a 2019 update to this? This was released three years ago. Frightening enough for 2016. Where do things stand now?

    • @courierton9217
      @courierton9217 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Its doing great at this time. Please google " PV magazine " for all the latest updates.

    • @markchamberlin8987
      @markchamberlin8987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@courierton9217 So grateful.

  • @dominicknesbitt1152
    @dominicknesbitt1152 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everything about that Chinese professor was so adorable, he's just so pumped about renewable energy

  • @freeelectron8261
    @freeelectron8261 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great documentary - so positive and gives us hope for clean energy throughout the globe, even a reversal of global warming.

  • @СергейШилов-ь3о
    @СергейШилов-ь3о 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does diversity comes from diversification? Once on a road across a desert a cowboy met an aborigen. "Are you alone here?" - asked one. "Cann't you count at all?" - was the answer.

  • @stuartbrown1569
    @stuartbrown1569 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    In the future, they will say, it was a no brainier, solar can bring in 20 times as much energy per hectare, without water, or fertilizer, on agriculturally useless desert land. Electric vehicles cost a tenth as much to power, need a tenth of the maintenance costs, the roaring 20's are back, in the first industrial revolution, they made 5,000 miles of railway tracks in a single decade. In the second industrial revolution, the number of vehicles increased by tenfold in one decade 1915-25, in Australia 25% of the deserts, could produce a trillion tons of liquid hydrogen per year. Then there's LED's, in high rise farming, using reverse osmosis desalination, Australia could, using the same 25% of its deserts, produce all of the world's food requirements, don't say energy and transport can't change in a decade. They did in the second industrial revolution, they did it in half a decade recently, unconventional hydrocarbon production, between 2009 and 2014, crashed energy costs, China, with the world's largest population, changed it's rail transport to high speed 2008-13. Once again, they'll tell you energy and transport can't change, in a decade, but I've just shown you, that they did, in half a decade, only a few years ago.

    • @Dana5775
      @Dana5775 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Roger Reimer the internal combustion engines take far more energy to forge. It’s all steel and the melting point is 2,800 degrees.
      And when your done they still burn fossil fuels.
      There are only four basic elements in solar panels. Many can be replaced by less rare components.
      Thin film solar panels are printed and do not require the heat that silicone does ( silicone is cheap and abundant.)There are millions of panels still working after 30 years as we speak.
      The infrastructure for panel installation is aluminum. (700 degrees melting point).
      New roofs can be replaced by solar shingles. The petro based composite shingles take huge energy as they are made of petro themselves.
      Windmills: The generators have far less components than their generator alternatives & have a fraction of the steel.
      The poles that elevate them are less than the building (steel) to house generators at power plants.

    • @mslovechild777
      @mslovechild777 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There has to be a balance of need versus regeneration of the planet and altering human behaviour. Prioritising correctly so it's not just consume consume. Swapping coal and oil for wind and solar is an improvement of course, but desert can be regenerated. And that land produces. Moving to regeneratives systems will provide fresh water, food, employment and take care of our planet. I would loathe to see fields of solar panels take over the open spaces of the planet; spaces that could be saved from the degradation already caused by human activity, only to be further abused by being paved over.

    • @weatherphobia
      @weatherphobia 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      NUCLEAR POWER will NEVER be outdone by solar or wind... You're stuck in a pipe dream.

    • @teksal13
      @teksal13 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@weatherphobia Is anyone developing 'molten salt' reactors?

    • @xyzsame4081
      @xyzsame4081 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@weatherphobia Solar IS already cheaper than new nuclear plants. if you have reasonable safety. Sure if it is an old plant from the 1970s and runs on wobbly limbs so to speak ..... The people that were damaged by Fukushima are NOT compensated. The risk is not insurable and it would be so costly that the government does not compensate them either. Tepco was saved, yes.

  • @hellcat1988
    @hellcat1988 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Documentaries like this and channels like Fully Charged are giving me a bit of hope that the world won't completely destroy itself. If we can get personal generation kits (something like 2-7KW a day) down in the $200-$300 range in the next few years we could see a serious change in the world beyond even what this documentary could hope to hint at.

    • @johnbenton4488
      @johnbenton4488 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      A valid point, and who do we approach first? The makers of panels, the sellers/installers of panels and other essential infrastructure. Where to begin? That is the question.

    • @hellcat1988
      @hellcat1988 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      John Benton
      The most expensive parts of the kits seem to be the panels. Batteries are getting cheaper and cheaper every day and a few old (but not dead) deep cycle marine batteries would work for a solar setup quite easy. If there was a "bring your own battery" kit it would help.
      Even now, there is a kit at harbor freight that's ridiculously expensive for the 45W output of the panels given how old the tech of the panels is.
      Sure, you can buy individual cells off ebay and build your own panels, but there's no reason with the current cost of the materials that a panel should cost more than $40 for something that can put out 30W-50W other than the assembly labor.
      If solar costs really have dropped 90% in the last few years, why hasn't it affected the cost to consumers nearly as much?

    • @johnbenton4488
      @johnbenton4488 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In short; profiteering, and trading on customer ignorance. The sooner the customer gets 'with it' the sooner panel prices will fall.

    • @loginssuckx3
      @loginssuckx3 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      The US has much higher residential solar prices than anywhere else in the world. It turns out that US installers are blowing wads of money on marketing and raising their prices because of that. Indeed, the sooner the customer gets "with it" the sooner prices will fall.

  • @CharlesDourdy
    @CharlesDourdy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Would really like to see the documents that back up the claims made in this documentary.
    Where are the hard numbers showing that the price of solar is cheaper? I'm not trying to be a detractor or troll, I'm interested in some research.
    Also, typically solar panels have a usable lifespan of 20 years max. This is due to solar radiation degradation of the surface material. Much like sunlight can fade your clothes or the paint on your house over time. Numbers I've seen show that you lose 0.5% to 1.5% energy generation per year. So it's very likely that even when you do build a super megawatt generating solar field , you're going to need to completely change out all of the panels every other decade.
    Has that been addressed?
    Still, would really like to see documentaries that provide a link to background documentation.

    • @ddskimmer
      @ddskimmer 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think that the more players involved in the making solar panels the more the competition, and cost competition would be created. You are still talking about 10 years from 2020.

    • @stan2880
      @stan2880 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't get what the big deal is? Nearly every car on the road will be replaced in 20 years. Solar panels are much smaller and simpler to replace.

  • @happycamper4328
    @happycamper4328 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please post an updated documentary.

  • @elhadjiamadoujohnson4166
    @elhadjiamadoujohnson4166 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you!!!

  • @regularjoe9032
    @regularjoe9032 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    fantastic piece👌

  • @aktk1977
    @aktk1977 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The problem is the battery and not about the capability of the solar panel.

    • @loginssuckx3
      @loginssuckx3 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Being solved now

    • @Dana5775
      @Dana5775 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not a problem as far as non mobile battery storage is concerned it is already here. Flow batteries are cheap last 25 yrs & can take as much current as you can throw at it.
      And if you were paying attention the e-car revolution can second as a backup for whole neighborhoods.
      The rest of the world is. Quickly becoming independent. Your argument is obsolete as of 2012.
      Not to mention the brake through on mobile batteries already proven in the lab and in prototypes.

    • @alext9067
      @alext9067 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dana Putnam
      You're coming off sounding like a real piece of shit. That's no way to win people over. We don't need assholes on our side. The battery is the problem and has always been the problem.

    • @Dana5775
      @Dana5775 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      alex tworkowski not sure if you replied to the intended person as your comment does not seem relevant to my own. I provided you with info and you responded with the same statement from your post.
      Also I do not use profanity or use derogatory commentary nor do I result to name calling. These discussions are technical and intellectual and I am here to share info or learn info.
      There is a lot of misinformation or obsolete info. on the topic of renewables. If you expect to inform an individual please respond the the data and do not personally attack the person just their info.
      You have not provided an argument or a discussion regarding this topic or my contribution.
      Are you an intellectual? No evidence has been provided for that determination other than the observation of the above mentioned poor behaviour!
      P.s. I have a number of comments on this video and have received a large number of likes regarding them!

    • @samlsd9711
      @samlsd9711 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The batteries are the most expensive

  • @malcolmholt4142
    @malcolmholt4142 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got on board the solar wagon 10yrs ago with a modest 2kw array on my roof. Since then It has produced nearly 25,000kwh of clean power reducing my energy cost to a mere $150-$200 yr av. With battery technology improving hand over fist and the cost falling almost audibly, I don't understand why everyone isn't on it! . ..Love the idea of using a car battery for domestic storage!

  • @dustinhouk739
    @dustinhouk739 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    We just painted a solar energy Manufacturing facility in Toledo Ohio. First solar

    • @LordRustyMcAlpin
      @LordRustyMcAlpin 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome news. Don't forget to pay cost plus 10%. If I don't get my 10% for the widows and orphans and the poor. I'll shut off the sun.

  • @valeriebest6045
    @valeriebest6045 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    FYI - Video poster of this: The video translation in the China portions of this show incorrect wording to what is on the film screen. You may want to fix that. It's only after the speaker returns to English that the screen correctly shows correct for the closed-captioning screen option.

  • @VV-ju8xh
    @VV-ju8xh 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Can't wait to see electric vehicles and clean renewable energy fully used on earth

    • @rRobertSmith
      @rRobertSmith 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Tons and tons of steel and glass for solar are NOT CLEAN. COKE to make the steel boxes the solar cells are put is NOT CLEAN. When a hurricane or wind storm (with hail) wipes out your solar farm it is not sustainable.

    • @courierton9217
      @courierton9217 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The solar project is growing fast. No time for conspiracy theory.

    • @Gabrielsmessinger
      @Gabrielsmessinger 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Until electric cars can run on sustained energy, and not electric produced by coal, which is what happens now, it isnt practical. Or clean. You cant shut fossil out until the tech gets better. Solar efficiency needs to get better, it is, slowly. But not even 50% capture yet.
      There is better tech-bought off or stolen from inventors, that is hidden by greedy and evil ppl who have investment in fossil. Tesla was on the right track.
      Did you know that in many places, living off grid, self sustained and clean is illegal?
      Politics and hate. If you hate, you are manipulated and part of the problem-

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How do you recharge the batteries?

    • @colingenge9999
      @colingenge9999 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@rRobertSmith Your argument was created by the fossil fuel industry, it's bogus and you shouldn't repeat it.

  • @ebutuoy8272
    @ebutuoy8272 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the last statement 45:51

  • @colingenge9999
    @colingenge9999 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Creating a renewable energy economy, done correctly, will be the greatest economic opportunity of this century. Fossil fuel companies' subsidies must be tapered to zero, they must start paying for the megadeaths they are causing (they make opioid mfr look like saints with 110,000 premature deaths in the US alone) and the environmental damage they cause.
    "but we rely on fossil fuels for power and plastics" yes, but there is currently little incentive for companies like Exxon to plan for vastly increased supply. They are getting away with murder and yes renewables are close to competitive now. When fossil fuel stops its free ride and a free market for renewables evolves, costs will go down so that fossil fuels will not be competitive.
    Consider homeowners collecting solar and storing power in their homes and cars that they can sell back to their neighbors based on bid/ ask pricing. If storage is needed, it will be provided in the most competitive means similar to Uber ride sharing where demand dictates price and small players make it run.
    For decades the Pacific Northwest has sold power to California which is bought back at night for low price, used to pump water back into dams so it can be sold the next day to CA. Stored solar using the free market.

    • @fenderbender1296
      @fenderbender1296 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Solar energy is toxic in its construction and creates deserts due to extreme land usage. Also inefficient.

  • @MrSalehovich
    @MrSalehovich 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I kid you not, it reaches 50 degrees Celsius here in Abu Dhabi. About time somebody came to utilize that :)

  • @goodqualityelectrics
    @goodqualityelectrics 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    very inspiring.. Hope my country would join the renewable change..

  • @sonju2k71
    @sonju2k71 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is going to change my life. I always wanted to work on sustainability and now it is going to pay also.

  • @mcteeny3067
    @mcteeny3067 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    lets go!!! future will be great!

  • @Chandlerd17
    @Chandlerd17 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    42:20 yes ther is one negative to the switch and that is mitigating the land mass used for solar energy production, Wich is still an issue for now that is not discussed enough,it is an oxymoron to cut down trees in order to provide renewable energy.