I think Chelsea wingers are too comfortable staying in the wind areas waiting for 1v1 situations. They should learn to make blind-side runs against high line. There were situations where they could have run at Liverpool's backline but they didn't.
Non penalty xG = 1.15 vs 0.99. Then consider all the blocked shots (Palmer/Jones) and attempts like Palmer and Veiga off target you can see Liverpool were troubled throughout the game.
There is context. In open play it was 1-1, so obviously defensive weaknesses were exposed and if you watched the game it could have gone either way. Teams can see that as a way to go at liverpool and it lays a blueprint in future.
I think Chelsea wingers are too comfortable staying in the wind areas waiting for 1v1 situations. They should learn to make blind-side runs against high line. There were situations where they could have run at Liverpool's backline but they didn't.
How when they just had 2 shots on target?
Non penalty xG = 1.15 vs 0.99. Then consider all the blocked shots (Palmer/Jones) and attempts like Palmer and Veiga off target you can see Liverpool were troubled throughout the game.
Blah blah blah, Liverpool is still better than Chelsea defensively.
🤔 Chelsea lost 😂🤪
U look stupid🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
Huh! Jones exposed Chelsea defence weakness by sneaking through 7 chelsea players who defended parking bus!😂😂😂
Liverpool were the one parking the bus. They were too scared to face Chelsea head to head. Idiot
Parking the bus? Bro did u see the possession, it was 58% to chelsea
Parking a bus how you can't break teams down. And Chelsea failing to mark Jones exposed u
@@ntambibrian3763slot parking fc
@@raymond_efootball1889it's only 3 points count at the end of game
the loser and winner, who was exposed,😂😂😂
There is context. In open play it was 1-1, so obviously defensive weaknesses were exposed and if you watched the game it could have gone either way. Teams can see that as a way to go at liverpool and it lays a blueprint in future.
Very well said!