Should the King Stop Paying for Prince Andrew's Security?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- King Charles is paying a reported £3m a year to fund security for his brother Prince Andrew, but with the contract due to end this autumn, is it time the King stops paying for his non-working royal brother's security?
Broadcast on 20/08/24
Stream Good Morning Britain live, every weekday from 6am on the ITVX 📲 daytimelink.itv...
Subscribe now for more! bit.ly/1NbomQa
Like, follow and subscribe to Good Morning Britain!
The Good Morning Britain TH-cam channel delivers you the news that you’re waking up to in the morning. From exclusive interviews with some of the biggest names in politics and showbiz to heartwarming human interest stories and unmissable watch again moments.
Join Susanna Reid, Ed Balls, Kate Garraway, Richard Madeley, Charlotte Hawkins and Sean Fletcher every weekday on ITV from 6am until 9 every weekday!
ITVX: daytimelink.itv...
Website: bit.ly/1GsZuha
TH-cam: bit.ly/1Ecy0g1
Facebook: on. 1HEDRMb
Twitter: bit.ly/1xdLqU3
www.itv.com
#GMB #princeandrew #kingcharles #royalfamily
Prince Harry has been cut off security. Disgraced Andrew should have been cut off long ago.🧿
Prince Harry and his family were not cut off from their security. They had 28 days when they planned to visit the UK. Remember, they are now living in the United States and paying taxes there. They are not paying taxes in the UK, so why should the British taxpayer pay for their security? Please explain
Prince Harry just talked about his life but Prince Andrew was close friend to a convicted person who have been sentenced to prison for wrongdoing. The King prefers to punish his son and protect his crimal friend brother. That's non-sens.
@@nellykatende7443no to mention Andrew was accused of alleged crimes against a minor himself.
All Harry did was contradict the media's narrative of his life.
@nellykatende7443 King's brother Andrew lives in the confinement of the Royal family protection and whenever he decides to leave then he can pay for his protection. I am a British taxpayer and why should I pay for Harry and his family's security they decided to abdicate to the United States they are not contributing anything for the British people.The country pays for the Royal family services to the country.People like you do not look above the surface.
Agree fully🎉
If this was a story about a single parent living in a massive house, with no job and refusing to leave after their landlord tells them to leave, there would be no debate...
Andrew is a weathy man and he should pay for his own home and security .
If Harry can do it so can Andrew. What is good for Andrew is good for Harry
2 spares of a kind!
No one should be paying anything for andrew.
Might cost the taxpayer less than if he was sent to prison!
is this not through monies queen elizabeth left?
Andrew did not ask to be born into a high risk family. Security is not a luxury. It is a necessity.
@@valeriemahabir7997 well I guess you are correct, every child molester should have security, preferably locked in a prison.
If I had a brother I would pay for him. Wouldn't you?
If King Charles stops paying for security and anything happens to Andrew it's Andrews fault because he won't move because of big his ego.
If Andrew moves to Kensington, he gets Kensington security while there. The King is cutting off his Royal Lodge security. The message is: move so the King can do something productive with Royal Lodge. Pretty simple.
You used a key word in there. Productive. King Charles III wants to do something productive w/ Royal Lodge (I would gather after it's been renovated). Frogmore Cottage is renovated and waiting and I'm positive it's a secure place to live.
Here is my American take on Andrew. He was known to be a great favorite of Queen Elizabeth, and I believe would never, ever have taken the steps she took to remove him as a working member of the Royal Family, nor stripped his titles and privileges had she not had absolute, irrefutable proof of his quilt in all things "Epstein". This wonderful lady lived a life of service to GB and the Commonwealth putting the Crown before herself and her own wishes. I believe Andrew was ordered to settle the SA lawsuit with Ms Giuffre as there was no way to exonerate him. Perhaps Andrew has not spoken out against the Royal Family, but he did do much damage throughout his adult life to bring heartache and shame. He was indeed born a prince, but never behaved as a true prince of the realm or acted in service to those he should have served. Andrew has been nothing but a burden, an embarrassment, and disappointment to the Royal Family as he behaved as spoiled, entitled brat his entire life...IMHO.
The King should not only stop paying a dime for anything on Andrew's behalf, but also enforce the "letter of law" in the lease for Royal Lodge, which Andrew cannot affor to live in much less keep up property as it should be. Andrew needs to scurry off like the failure he is as a prince and Royal Family member, and live out his life as a private citizen and in solitude. JMHO
Prince Harry was born a prince but you had no issues removing his protection.
The hypocrisy is why is CIII allowed to pay for Andrew's police protection when Harry is not allowed to pay for him and his family's protection when they visit the UK.
Harry is also a Prince why should Andrew get protection and Harry not? BS no protection for Harry because they want Harey to leave Meghan and his children and we all know it.
Who is you? Prince Harry's security was removed by the Home Office and RAVEC and that is why he took the Home Office and RAVEC to court and NOT the late Queen or the King. The private security that Charles pays for are NOT armed. It is private security. That is not what Harry wants. He wants ARMED Royal Met Protection which is issued by Govt. He lost the case in the High Court. Let us see whether he wins on appeal.
At the end of the day Harry and his family moved to Montecito and are happy there. He rarely flys into the UK
When hypocrisy meets shamelessness
@@lfaz4296charles wasn't making that decision though.
So if something happened to Harry, the King will be excused???????
You mean, let's say, Mpox??😮
Yes...he's nothing just a person...no better than the rest of us
Yes it's Harry's fault
Harry has earned whatever comes his way!
@@nannyofmany8315and this is exactly why He left the UK. They did it to his Mum and they are doing it to him. Good for him for leaving that Cult that is the Royal “family”. Which is not family at all
It’s about time that Andrew moves out and retire in peace. Finally the king is making a great decision, Andrew should be treated worse than Harry.
Should have been done years ago
Andrew should have invested his monies better. It's pretty sad that his older brother is still having to take care of him. Cut the cord.
Harry was born a prince too and the royals had no problem cutting them off.
Do you mean 'Cut the cord'? What does 'Cut the core' mean?
Am laughing my head off. Did he say he was born a Prince and he is at risk. 🛎️ So Prince Harry can also get his too
He looked even dumber saying it because he was being haunted by the thoughts what he and all of them have said about Prince Harry. It doesn’t make sense he knew he was contradicting himself. Guilty conscience.
🤣🤣😅😅
This is because of Meghan's hatred the Royal family have for Meghan.
These presenters are confusing facts. King Charles pays for private security for Andrew. That private security is not armed. Harry is not looking for private security. Harry is looking for armed Royal Met Protection police with access to intelligence that is given by the Home Office and RAVEC. Harry is also looking for reinstatement of IPP Status which has nothing to do with the King
God no
He doesn’t even pay it for his own son. The family is weird
If you referring to the traitor Hazbeen, he decided to leave the UK, he knew the conditions!💩
More Frog than Human😊
Harry made mega millions rubbishing monachy rf only fair he pay for his own security
Nor should he!
@@captainjamesjamesy1053
Charles should not pay for Hazbeen, he left and is a grown man‼️
Plenty of security at any one of his majesty's prisons
I do not believe the Queen died without making provisions for Andrew from her private fortune.
I agree he needs to move out of that Royal Lodge going to a smaller house that he can afford to pay for by his own means . Why should the King pay for him when he doesn’t do anything to help the royal family?
Andrew paid £1 million for. 75 year lease on the “ royal lodge” maintained it with his own money, that’s why he is refusing to move….the queen paid his protection when she was alive, That’s why Charles is paying it,
Harry left this country, of his own accord, knew exactly what he would be losing , Inc the uk public paying for his protection, he has always had some provided when he has come to the uk, and that’s the only time we should be paying for it….he not a working royal, wether being the kings son or not, he loses that privilege…..
“He would be living in fear” - what, like his victims don’t live in fear every day?
Harry and Meghan Step back from Royal duties, not from the Royal Family. As the gentleman said of Andrew, he was born a Prince, just as Harry and Archie and Lillibet. We all know why Harry and his family are treated that way
100%
Brexit has cost £140 Billion so far, we can't afford things like the Monarchy any more. We've hungry children to feed, the NHS to fund, and a £140+ Billion Brexit black hole to fill.
Boring boring boring. Get over yourself Brexit is done. The UK has out performed the EU over the last yr or so gdp is up on the G8 and the UK is the fastest growing economy in the G8 and Europe so get with the times you remoaner
@@britbazza3568 Growing from a low base. Time you Brexiteers start to acknowledge the damage you did.
£140 billion??????
@@user-mk1rr6cu8mI know right? Keep in mind that I heard people who were voting for Brexit saying they were voting to remove the Pakistani from the UK. They're not the sharpest tools in the box are they? If only they bothered to open a map before voting 😂.
If the Royal family can do this to their blood Prince Harry, God knows what treatment Princess Diana went through with the Royal family behind closed doors. God bless her spirits.
Andrew gets PRIVATE UNARMED SECURITY paid for by Charles. He was stripped of ARMED ROYAL MET PROTECTION years ago. Harry DOES NOT WANT private unarmed security protection. He wants Armed Royal Met Protection which is given by the Govt through the Home Office and RAVEC. If it was up to Charles Harry would have taken Charles to Court and not the Home Office and RAVEC. People give Charles powers he really does not have. If Harry wanted private security protection I am sure Charles would pay for it but that is not what Harry wants
I remember the late Princess Margaret’s quotes to the late Queen Elizabeth II when she found out that she had put her brother’s children in a mental hospital.
“ If you don’t fit the perfect mold of silent, dutiful supplication, you will be put out or hidden worst and declared dead.”
@@ingridclaire5735That was a fictionalized conversation portrayed in a televised drama, petal. 🌸 Do get a grip.
Prince Harry is a prince and he lost his protection,wth!why is he still in royal lodge????Andrew is not a working royal
He hasn't lost it when in UK. It's just the taxpayers of other countries that don't pay for it, and UK cops should not have to live and work overseas to follow him aroun with UK taxes paying for it.
@@caronyardley8834he's never asked for them to follow him overseas just while in the UK.
He offered to pay as to not be a burden on the UK ppl. It was denied.
Andrew's police protection is paid for by the King.
So why can't Harry pay for the same?
If Prince Harry wasn't married to Meghan and left the royal family, he would have security and all the other great benefits....who we kidding 😂 it's a racism thing 😅
NO HE WOULDNT, the security they want is for SENIOR WORKING ROYALS ONLY, it is funded by the british taxpayers and he does not qualify for it
Spot on. They even claimed Diana was offered 24/hr police protection after she divorved Charles.
Sorry it is Home Office RAVEC thing and that is why Harry has taken them to court. Do keep up
Harry is not the first royal family member to live out of the UK. Edward and Wallis come to mind. Was that a racism thing?
@@the___truth8038 diana REFUSED the security, and she never called the royal family racist or slagged them off in the media at every opportunity she got
Family argument the public shouldn't even be involved with. Charles money so he can do as he pleases and it is time for these situation that Charles should act as he pleases. What need does Andrew have of a 30 roomed house that is reported he cannot afford, yet still rides horses and his Bentley.
@shogun- we the taxpayers in UK provide the finances for Charles to dispense or not. I for one would prefer that money to be used for the masses who are in need jn the country rather than a family of what I regard as 'spongers'
Funny where was this attitude when it was Harry getting kicked out? or his family's security cut off while under a threat level the same as the Queen Elizabeth II at the time.
Or any of the millions of other reports by "unnamed unverifiable sources" about their sensationalist speculation about Harry's life.
King Charles lacks the wisdom to be a king. He continues to fight with his brother and his son. What a king. This same man destroyed his family with his mistress.
King Charles life, is based around Camilla. He's a follower NOT a leader
So IF beyond a shadow of doubt it can be proved that Andrew Windsor has dealt with minors. Does he still deserve security because he was quote ’born a Prince’?
THIS comment !! 👏🏻 📢 !!!!!!!
He gets private security that his brother pays for. The late Queen stripped him of Armed Royal Met Police Protection a long time ago. Charles can spend his private money any way he chooses in my view.
Thatcher dealt with miners! :)
@@user-ig7lv1rw6z while Charles protected Disgraced Andrew he cut protection for Harry and his family who merely spoke up and contradicted the media's narrative about them.
I don’t think he going to lose his security, he is losing security to royal lodge to get him to move out and he would have security at his smaller house which is completely reasonable!
Andrew had years of chumming around with fabulously wealth Arab princes who did business with him. Eliza also gave him an estate when he married. He was on Eliza’s payroll all his life plus the years he received a hefty salary as trade ambassador. In short, where did all that money go? Somehow I don’t think he gave Fergie free access to his money. I’m sure Eliza must have chatted with him about who was going to support him in his old age. I’m sure even after she stripped him of his titles and paid Virginia G. off, Eliza left him a tidy sum to see him through his old age.
Charles removed Frogmore from Harry. He can jolly well remove Royal Lodge from Andrew. At 60+ it’s way past time for Andrew to grow up and accept that he’s reached the age where downsizing is called for. He and Fergie have been empty nesters for quite some time. It’s time to move to Frogmore.
Grifters, the lot of them. It's about the outdated royal institution was abolished.
@@Worldagenda24 there christian thou
So the argument is that Andrew did not choose to be in royal family but because he was born into it he must be protected. So if that statement is true that because you are born into a royal family, one must be protected because of it; then Harry should be protected as well.
Asking how he would afford it is HILARIOUS bro dear lord
The Princess Royal is the daughter of a queen and she only has protection when on official royal business. Same for Prince Edward and the others who work for the crown on occasion. Why should Andrew be treated differently than his sister and brother?
So what is something happen to Prince Harry
I really don’t get how they can dismiss the hypocrisy. Really bizarre listening to the debate.
Security does not equate to life and provide immortality. Harry could fall off one of his polo horses and die. Harry could get ill and die. Indira Ghandi the Prime Minister of India at the time was shot dead in her garden by her top military security guards. There are no guarnatees. If Harry is not safe in the UK then he should stay in Montecito where he feels safe and is happy. Why go to a country where he feels unsafe? There is nothing in the UK for him anyway.
It DID, Fool. He needs protection from a wife!😅😅
I think that is up to the King what he does with his personal funds.
Exactly.
Let me get this straight; Prince Harry gets cut off from absolutely everything for no good reason. Prince Andrew that plays with children on an organisational level, oh no we couldn’t possibly leave him unprotected 😢
The hypocrisy is clear!
The invisible contract was why he was cut off.
Harry's crime seems to be speaking out and contradicting the media's narratove about him.
No good reason? You can’t be serious.
Be an adult pay for your own
The racist is back on
Andrew can't stay there. He seems to be his own worst enemy. Exit the lodge, no more fudge no more mudge.
If he goes to jail he would have lots off protection . But after being involved in trafficking young under age girls he should be in jail
Why is his ex wife still staying at the Lodge?? Who is she? Andrew can shift to his daughter luxurious empty house. Why hold on to the Lodge??
Kick him out
Hea got a 75 year lease there. And charles was paying andrews security using private funds not the taxpayer. No one can tell charles how to spend his own money. He can give andrew money with his own money no problem.
@@cephasmakuzvaMeans Nothing if he can't pay for repairs 😂
@@user-hd1ln2uk3w i dont think you understand me. Charles is giving andrew millions of pounds a year so he can survive (someone andrews level only knows how to survive on millions a year) . Those millions are also used by andrew to pay repairs at the royal lodge. Charles is funding everything with his own money. And Charles has been funding andrews life at the royal lodge since jan 2022 when he lost his working royal title. Now charles is saying since ive been funding you voluntarily because everyone else in our family refuses to fund you. As your financier please move out of royal lodge into frogmore cottage. And again ill fund you money every year to survive (several million a year) whilst you live there. And andrew is saying no. Then the question is what happens if charles becomes like the rest of the family and says ok andrew your refusing so now i pay you £0.00 a year. andrew wouldnt fold straight away. Hes still got millions off what charles was giving him plus a few million from before so after charles stops paying hed probably do another 5 years at the royal lodge before hed be SWEATING FOR REAL. HOMELESS. REALLY STUCK.
Stop paying for him he should move
His daughters married billionairs...MOVE IN WITH THEM
That's what we do in America...or move into a nursing home
Both Andrew and Harry are born princes : they need to be protected. This is this issue as well that made Harry leave : he would have faced what Andrew are facing today.
Wrong. Play by the rules or suffer the consequences. Period.
love seeing the media helping charles to destroy his family.
They did it with Diana they did it with Harry they'll happily throw people under the bus for the monarchy
Well well well saaaaaaaaaaid.
Not sure why the media get their knickers in a twist from reports from so called royal experts. I would not be surprised if Andrew is up at Balmoral and has been enjoying hunting and fishing with Charles
Andrew should provide his own cash for security and stop living free on the royal purse. He is disgraced. He no longer represents the role. So if the principle applies to him being born a Prince where is the same principle for Harry and his family? Hypocrisy. Also he doesn't need that grace and favour house. As for the attempt to kidnap The Princess Royal, she is a role model and dedicated to her position, Andrew does not represent anything decent apart from his military service, which all of us service families feel he has now trashed. So no, give him the bare minimum, a small abode, a minimum income and let him work for his income.
Andrew should be in prison
Andrew should face what anyone else would. An investigation and then be judge by a jury of his peers. If that ends in jail then jail.
So Duncan do you want to say Harry was born a prince?
He has disowned his son, so his brother should be easier,especially when he has dishonored himself and all connected to him.
Andrew and Sarah are too freeloaders
Sarah has her own money, she’s a writer.
Then just move and he will have his security. He's in a place he can't afford. The UK is paying his bills, so he needs to go. He clearly doesn't make his own money. He's been mooching for years. The UK is struggling and the royal family receives so much money from the British people.
Wish this woman would let people finish a sentence!
Did thus guys really said it is unfair etc leave a member of the RF exposed??? Seriously??? The hypocrisy is frankly mind-boggling!
Prince Harry was deprived of his mum by his father's disgraceful behaviour then traumatised by her tragic life and death. Then his father has the nerve to crown his mistress and whitewash the whole sorry mess. Yet his son who fought for this country's beliefs, is shunned. He stands up for himself and is then punished again and again. I'm sorry but Charles is a failure as a husband, a father, and a King, and he let his mother down too. His sins on the other hand are a whole lot more decent. Please wake up King Charles, no mistress is as important as your sons and grandkids.
I don't know (or care) who that woman on the panel is but she seems very closed minded and not interested in other people's opinions. Harry decided to leave the royal family and earns enough money to pay for his own security. Andrew didn't decide to leave and is unable to pay for security which by being born in to the royal family he needs.
This insane, he’s not a private citizen. He can’t change who’s family he was born into.
I though you could not purchase PRIVTE SECURITY IS'T THAT WHAT YOU TOLD HARRY. WHAT KIND OF FATHERPAYS FOR BROTHET SECURITY BUT NOT HIS SON. BRITS ARE LIERS.
The father who still has sons knife in his back or are you forgetting what those two have sold about our late queen and his own family
He has a personal wealth of nearly 10million so he can easily pay for his own security.
Thank-you! That's the figure I've been looking for in the comments. $10M pounds and he couldn't see fit to renovate Royal Lodge even a little? It's made sound as though if he loses his security and has to leave Royal Lodge that he'll be homeless and starving. Far from it! At 64, $10M would only give him 3 years and a bit of the security he's receiving now. But, what does he need security for when he does nothing?
He is a role model for people and young girls across the world.
Patriotism rules and Brits should pay!
Everybody will agree Andrew can go to the wolves for all we care
King, Queen, Prince, Lord... these titles are ridiculous. This is 21st century UK, not an episode of Game of Thrones. Get rid of all of them!
He could put one of his teddy bears in each of the rooms in the house that he is living in now.
He does nothing because he’s been stripped of his duties.
Stop paying the lot of them. They have plenty in abundance ✌🏼❤️
he is born a prince, he always will be. he did terrible things. he is not doing any work for gor the monarchy anymore, and he is incredibly arrogant. ge is offeted a house for free, Frogmore cottage, he will have free security because FMcottage is in the complex already heavily protected and he will receive money to live. if you do some unbelievable bad you have to live with the consequences. most people end up in prison .
He is still very privileged.
Now the media are saying they could move into Fergies £4,000,000. Belgravia apartment that is sitting empty. He`s got some gall, he buys a luxury ski chalet for i believe about 12 million Euros then doesn`t pay for it, until the previous owners threaten litigation, then our old Queen got involved.
If members of the Royal family are dishonest, who can you trust !!!
It’s no one’s business, as long it’s not tax payers cash. Simples.
No one wants to kidnap Andrew
😂😂😂
charles got all of the Queen's wealth.. that would cause me to do harm to charles if he kicked me out.
Haha Oh my can you imagine!? Andrew doing a drop by on Charles? Lol
Wait we still paying for that nounce
NO. Charles pays for unarmed private security for Andrew from his own personal funds
Still paying for Liz and Phil, 2😮😮
Get him out of there.
Won’t he have protection living on the grounds of Windsor?
Kate Garroway of GMB is shilling for the RF?
Harry does get security when he's in the UK. Every time he visits he has a convoy of range rovers. You don't see Harry waiting for a taxi at the airport ot taking the underground when he visits the court for his many lawsuits. Harry's issue is that he doesn't have the Scotland Yard protection officers round the clock wherever he lives. That is what he's so angry about.
He'd be willing to pay for it out of pocket.
Lol, is this gor real? Did he not stop his own son
Do you honestly think that the public would ever miss andrew or harry if they were gone. Maybe the two princes should move in together. If.
You agree that he should move then stop supporting his bad behavior.
When I saw you’d got that woman on, I went straight to the comments. Couldn’t watch the interview!
She is not interested in other people's opinions. She thinks she is always right and is not open for discussion. Totally full of herself who ever she is.
He doesn't pay. as usual in a roundabout we do ive had enough.
As a royalist I am all up for Andrew being kicked out of the lodge as he disgraced his own family and himself.
The RF have LOTS OF PROPERTIES ALL OVER THE UK; Prince Andrew could move to one of those that is smaller (what do he and Fergie need with a 30-bedroom mansion?) and less expensive to upkeep than the Royal Lodge which, apparently, Prince Andrew has not kept up-to-date with renovations and maintenance. As to Prince Andrew's security, if he's not a working Royal, which he will never be again due to his nefarious associations and reported disgraceful behavior, the King should NOT have to pay for Prince Andrew's security unless he is NEAR OR WITH ONE OR MORE WORKING ROYALS.
HARRY is a grown man to.HARRY and YPMM CALL GIRL IS not a working ROYAL.
By his own words. Andrew was born a prince- Harry was born a prince and should be protected because things do happen.
If Harry's was axed and he did nothing illegal...YES !!!
Then let's question the Royals generally...can we choose ???
Treason is not illegal?
@@visnjajojic6486 shouldn't be...in a democracy
Isn’t Andrew a wealthy man? Can he not pay for his own security?
She is not interested in other people's opinions. She thinks she is always right and is not open for discussion. Totally full of herself who ever she is.
What is it got to with that woman when the King is paying for it not the tax payers
Do you understand how the monarchy got and remains rich? I think you dont😅
He can go get a job....
I think Andrew forfeited his security through his disgusting behaviour.
This has been the biggest Smoke & Mirrors Distractional Game of the Century. “Look over here don’t look over there “ whilst we have had our eyes averted to J.E.,s means of Blackmail earning . We forget what was more important that J.E was a Financier, remember that it is key ! Andrew thought he was superior and could become a Billionaire via financial gain , Andrew was meant to keep Sunninghill Park Property he inherited from The Queen Mother. But he sold it to Maldonado to plat the Markets. Using his role as Trade Envoy , J.E his Financial BFF Andrew had more in common than is realised. The children and Teens on Little Saint James , we’re just used as a means to their end. Just objects for their wealth. People need to wake up read the Panama and Pandora Papers to discover what a cruel cold calculating person Prince Andrew really is. Save the Children and above all our Finances too.
How does this man know what was in the Queen's will as it's secret? unlike our wills which are public.
It's no our problem how he makes money
YES!! Andrew should be stopoed receiving security for fred. Charles is right to stop it.
The lodge is to big for two people. And its upkeep is out of andrews financial means.
I havebsee pictures of ffogmore an its nice. . But rezd how andrew wants tye lodge to shiw status
Is not going tonwork because everyone knows he does not have the finances to upkeep. .
Its not a lodge its a palace.....
Jimmy 2 ie andrew should be in jail anyway not still living it up.
You guys forget he has other family members.He has two daughters an ex wife that he can lean on. Let them all figure it out.I'm sure they will if you force them to.
He abandoned his own son but still protects his criminal brother. That is telling.
No King Charles don’t have any responsibility to pay for Andrew security.Beside what about his children .They are rich .
The royal commentator knows perfectly well that Prince Harry did not abandon his work in the British Monarchy of his own free will, but he was forced to leave the United Kingdom because, metaphorically speaking, the monarchists of the British Monarchy, and who knows?" even some members of the British Royal Family "made his bed" so that Prince Harry would be forced to leave his country of origin and leave his job at the British Monarchy, a job for which Prince Harry was trained his entire life Just remember the campaign of insults, and even a campaign of "scorn and cursing" that was mounted by the British Media against Meghan and Prince Harry while they lived in the United Kingdom and carried out a series of activities within the British Monarchy, doing so with commitment, dedication and success ?! Sometimes it even seemed like the objective was to completely destroy Prince Harry's public image in the United Kingdom , in order to force him to leave the British Monarchy. And remember the coldness with which Prince William responded to journalists when they asked him about the birth of baby Archie. ?!
Furthermore, the criterion invoked regarding the fact that the
Prince Andrew being a Prince, and therefore needing private security also applies to Prince Harry.
He still has millions. It is going to dry up eventually but charles has been topping him up with millions every year. From private funds not tax payer which is allowed.
Yes! Call a moving company & mine him out!
I am beginning to wonder if there were agreements between Queen Elizabeth, before she died, and King Charles regarding Andrew and Harry. I don't think all of this nonsense is only the result of a weak King. Charles waited too long to be King to accept the direct and public refusals by his brother and son. King Charles' duty is to God and Country and possibly to honor promises he made to his Queen.
Andrew apparently has a net worth of approximately $5 million.
Like Harry he needs to grow up and retire quietly to a smaller home and be responsible for yourself.