What Arendt says in the Postscript, on p. 288, about whether or not this was a genocide, is actually quite different from what's being said here: "For the concept of genocide, introduced explicitly to cover a crime unknown before, although applicable up to a point is not fully adequate, for the simple reason that massacres of whole peoples are not unprecedented. They were the order of the day in antiquity, and the centuries of colonization and imperialism provide plenty of examples of more or less successful attempts of that sort. The expression 'administrative massacres' seems better to fill the bill". In any case - fantastic session, as always!
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.82[2/2] เมาท์มอยกับ 3 สาวเพื่อนซี้ ที่พร้อมขยี้พ่อหมีได้ทุกเมื่อ](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Wwn7WnylNtQ/mqdefault.jpg)
What Arendt says in the Postscript, on p. 288, about whether or not this was a genocide, is actually quite different from what's being said here: "For the concept of genocide, introduced explicitly to cover a crime unknown before, although applicable up to a point is not fully adequate, for the simple reason that massacres of whole peoples are not unprecedented. They were the order of the day in antiquity, and the centuries of colonization and imperialism provide plenty of examples of more or less successful attempts of that sort. The expression 'administrative massacres' seems better to fill the bill".
In any case - fantastic session, as always!
Netanyahu in the ICC? Same thing. Oh no.... Let us dig history instead.
Roger starts at 1:29
Many thanks!