The Zari Patka in Delhi : A Talk by Uday S. Kulkarni

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • It is often said that the 18th Century was a period of chaos in India. However, it can be more appropriately called a period of transition. The long period of rule by the Turks, Afghans and Mughals gave way to a new indigenous Empire that arose from south of the Narmada; the first time a people from the Deccan entered Hindustan. Dr Kulkarni believes it was an important historical era where we had an indigenous Empire before we fell under another spell of foreign rule.
    From the mid seventeenth to early nineteenth century, the Marathas came into prominence and their objective throughout the period remained Delhi. From a bestower of favours, the Emperor was reduced to a Maratha protectorate. This talk is on this eventful period, when the Maratha flag appeared and fluttered in Delhi through most of the 18th century.

ความคิดเห็น • 161

  • @chetanbandekar6854
    @chetanbandekar6854 4 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    One of the Dream of Shivaji Maharaj is to build all the temples destroyed. Majority of North temples are rebuilt by Marathas.

    • @lakshyasehgal4097
      @lakshyasehgal4097 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But sadly they didn't librate Kashi Vishwanath temple from gyanwapi mosque though they had a chance.

    • @chetanbandekar6854
      @chetanbandekar6854 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@lakshyasehgal4097 As you know at that time once Temple or Hindu get contaminated they do not use it again. Shivaji Maharaj tried for ghar vapasi but there was lot of opposition.

    • @atharvthorat3827
      @atharvthorat3827 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@lakshyasehgal4097 The Kashi Vishwanath temple that we see today has been built by the Marathas , it was built by Maharani Ahilyabai Holkar

    • @vijayjosh5895
      @vijayjosh5895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No one understood meaning of religion as did the great Chh. Shivaji.

    • @rdhiray1
      @rdhiray1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@lakshyasehgal4097 The present Kashi Vishwanath temple is built by Marathas. Ahiltabai Holkar built it . Marathas also planned to demolish the mosque there but there was a opposition from locals , so they gave up and built renovated the temple in available space.

  • @100pious
    @100pious 6 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    Never knew this
    Actually, I never learnt that Maratha were so strong. Text books should have chapters on this. But they have a few paragraphs

    • @siddhoj6992
      @siddhoj6992 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Actually Mahratha used to rape right and left after victory.... that's how they got their reputation.

    • @100pious
      @100pious 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@siddhoj6992 can you quote reference for your claim?

    • @utkarshkale5415
      @utkarshkale5415 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@siddhoj6992 Can you give reference to that. Because Marathas had history of sending back the captured women of enemy with dignity and honour. Unless you have a reference to prove what you state, please shut up.

    • @parassharma7800
      @parassharma7800 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@siddhoj6992 wrong! They never touched woman! It was a huge rule in Maratha dynasty. Unlike, Christian and Islamic empires which was basically made on rapes and bloodshed.

    • @redgeclisters2711
      @redgeclisters2711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@siddhoj6992 don't you know the rules of Chhatrapati Shivaji
      You dumb ass

  • @tenzinwangchuk4423
    @tenzinwangchuk4423 5 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    When a man not loose his honour. When a woman not loose her chastity. When a nation not loose their freedom. When they are looked after, swaraj in mentained.

  • @sanjayv8467
    @sanjayv8467 6 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    If you will investigate more deeply, you will find that Nadir Shah ran away fearing getting trapped in Delhi and then the prospect of facing our Rau. I would also like to correct you that Baji Rao was a great statesman having learnt the art from his father. Testimony is the series of mature letters that he had written to his great brother, Chimaji.

    • @kumarankiteshwar9716
      @kumarankiteshwar9716 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Actually it was Planned that as nadir saha left delhi the rajputana confideracy tried to put back Maharana of Mewar on the throne of Delhi with support of Baji Rao Pehswa but at time peshwa died and his brother also died few months later.. A big Blow to Maratha

    • @aneeshpandit4272
      @aneeshpandit4272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's correct. It's explained in Era of Bajirao a book by Dr. Uday kulkarni who's also a speaker in the video

    • @zain9109
      @zain9109 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers. Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.

    • @prateekdgr8one123
      @prateekdgr8one123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zain9109 Yes u should be ashamed of ur ammi jaan who removed her salwar in fear of Talwars... U r a converted Muslim... Ur forefathers were hindus

    • @varadharaj.k.subramanium
      @varadharaj.k.subramanium 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zain9109 Pls read the history for your self.Mughals didn't give anything they plundered and demolished .

  • @Cricketing_Nostalgia
    @Cricketing_Nostalgia 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Many thanks to Dr.uday ji and shrijan foundation for uploading this video.

  • @satishmungi6256
    @satishmungi6256 6 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Dilli che hi takht rakhtito Maharashtra mazha

  • @ashokkumarprashar2580
    @ashokkumarprashar2580 6 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    MARATHAS HAVING A WONDERFUL PAST THE BRAVE WARRIORS. COME AHEAD AND TAKE OVER AGAIN.

    • @soumilwarang
      @soumilwarang 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Marathas are now divided among themselves, sad but true.

    • @vilop4150
      @vilop4150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If all Indian's supports then it's truly near
      Once again swaraj will grow 🚩🚩🚩🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @zain9109
      @zain9109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers. Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.

    • @sahilsagwekar
      @sahilsagwekar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Marathas wanted Hindavi swarajya. Self rule of hindus.

    • @Raut-warrior
      @Raut-warrior ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zain9109 go and see the unbelievable kailash temple which even your terrorist aurangzeb couldn't destroy

  • @bhaveshdk
    @bhaveshdk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Misplaced compassion n misplaced sense of dharma destroyed us....never read Chanakya showing any mercy....I like his sense of greatness where one got to do everything to kill enemies n save our own kins rather than forgiving enemies without atonement!!!! # Chanakya applied manusmriti to 100% optimisation!!!

  • @vijayjosh5895
    @vijayjosh5895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Important point to note: The British took India from Marathas and not the Mughals.

  • @shrinivassane8099
    @shrinivassane8099 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Very very well delivered!!

  • @MrVenred
    @MrVenred 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow, I dont remember ever I was so engrossed for this long, I watched through this at one stretch. Thank you sir for this brief but concise account of history for a particular period of time.

  • @chariotsofiresn
    @chariotsofiresn 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    His two books are amazing

  • @lalitmulay2851
    @lalitmulay2851 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Mr.Uday Kulkarni has taken his inspiration from Mr.Ninad Bedekar who was a real historian , Engineer & Vice president in corporate group Cummins. He could understand the 3-4 languages spoken at the time from 16th century to 19th Century. He had decoded letters written at that time . The Marathi language which is spoken today or urdu language which is spoken today was completely different from 16th Century.

  • @samargupte1
    @samargupte1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fantastic talk....in one hour,, to give clarity such a complex period ...amazing

  • @dcmhsotaeh
    @dcmhsotaeh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    There is a remarkable resemblance between the conquests of Kannada Rastrakootas in first millennium of Indian history and the Marathas of 18 th century
    Both were from deccan below the vindhyas but reached up to ganga yamuna in north and kaveri in south and managed to rule over almost whole of subcontinent at some point of time

    • @YogirajMD
      @YogirajMD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Many of clans of maratha clans trace ancestry from rashtrakutas chalukyas and pallavas Linguistic identity of Kannada marathi is 11 12th century invention - with differentiation of seuna yadavas hoysalas and kakatiyas

  • @krishnamurthyjanardhan5919
    @krishnamurthyjanardhan5919 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    More than all the history, I'm overwhelmed by his ability to remember so much information, dates, names etc., That was really awesome

  • @MrDillbud
    @MrDillbud 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Colonization happens violently . I would not chracterize , The Southern Kings, Pallavas, Chola, Chera, Pandyas, etc., as Colonizers of South East Asia. Dharma Traditions, Art, Architecture, Culture and Civilizational Acceptance and Embrace happened Peacefully and with Mutual Give and Take.

  • @RichieSawant
    @RichieSawant 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    You forgot to name Sambhaji Maharaj here who for 7 years didn't let Mughals touch Maharashtra.

    • @swatit9372
      @swatit9372 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not true. Unfortunately much area was conquered by Mughal in his lifetime.

    • @atharvthorat3827
      @atharvthorat3827 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@swatit9372 You are absolutely wrong during Sambhaji Maharaj's lifetime the Maratha territory in Katnataka was doubled, the Marathas conquered northern territories of the Portuguese, the territories in Khandesh were added, the Marathas raided the Mughal city of Burhanpur in today's Madhya Pradesh, Mysore paid tribute to the Marathas,yes Marathas did loose 4-5 forts to Mughlas but they also added more 4-5 forts from Mughals it was after the death of Sambhaji Maharaj that a considerable amount of territory was lost to the Mughals but it was a gained regained.

    • @swatit9372
      @swatit9372 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Nirmit Patil Lefties and Marxist are worst in the world. They manipulate history. Stop reading such biased ppl. These ppl called the womanizer Akhbar great. What a shame.

    • @abhishekgote3208
      @abhishekgote3208 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@swatit9372 Chhatrapati Sambhaji repelled almost every Mughal attacks in swaraj territory plus he kept check on siddis and Portuguese too

    • @praphuldoke8280
      @praphuldoke8280 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True. It's very common across a perticular caste of historian to avoid teaching or mentioning about what Chatrapati Sambhaji did. Actually due to ch. Sambhaji only Aurangzeb had to stayed back to MH for 27 years and still he couldn't finish Marathas. It's simple, if he could have done that, then he would have left to his own capital rather than staying back in south. He mentioned many times that he thought after Chatrapati Shivaji, he can try extending Mughal empire to Deccan, but he was so unfortunate that Chatrapati Sambhaji was even better than his father. Aurangzeb also mentioned that he would have been fortunate if any of his son could be as brave and thoughtful as of Chatrapati Shivaji's son.

  • @PK-qe2py
    @PK-qe2py ปีที่แล้ว +2

    मराठ्यांचा जरीपटका 🚩🚩🚩🚩💪💪💪💪

  • @vagishnaganur3607
    @vagishnaganur3607 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great command over his subject,

  • @sandeep90166
    @sandeep90166 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx a million Uday sir for narating 18th century maratha history in English . Atleast now people will come to know about it.

  • @ananyalal7950
    @ananyalal7950 6 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    So true the story of Marathas has been erased from Delhi. Maybe its because Hindus and Muslims dynasties were working together, and being loyal to each other to extend. Maybe that kind of image is not something the politicians of India want the two communities to have.

    • @rohitadhatrao6877
      @rohitadhatrao6877 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      most of the times it weren't, it was the humiliation on the rajputs to even have an alliance with the mughals

    • @zain9109
      @zain9109 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers. Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.

    • @TheJediPrince
      @TheJediPrince 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zain9109 Atleast our ancestors were not rapists and murderes.

  • @Cricketing_Nostalgia
    @Cricketing_Nostalgia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mera anurodh hai Srijan talks team se ki Panipat ke teesre yuddha ki 14 January Ko Panipat ke Maha veeron ki smriti evam Shraddhanjali ke liye ek video banaye.
    14 January ka dinaank Makar Sankranti ka hai tatha Panipat ke teesre yuddha ki varshgaat ka bhi paawan diwas hai. Yeh wohi din hai jab dakkhan ke Maratha yoddhaaon ne Kurukshetra ke nikat Panipat ke raktaranjit dharti par Bharat Mata ke shatruon se loha lene ka nirnay kiya tha. Afghani lootera Abdaly tatha uske Bharat me lootpaat machaane waale sahyogiyon ne uttar Bharat mein bhayankar utpaat machaya tha..
    Uske virodh mein Marathaaon ne Sankranthi ke din Abdali se Rakta ki holi khelne ka nirnay kiya tha..
    Ek Lakh Marathas ne veergati prapt karke Bharat Bhoomi ki Raksha ki thi.
    Kripya us din ki sabhi Rashtrabhakton ko avgat kijiye.
    Bahut Bahut aabhaar dhanyavaad.

  • @ravidhyani3074
    @ravidhyani3074 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You are a very knowledgeable person sir.

  • @hcupadhyay2008
    @hcupadhyay2008 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you sir.
    How easy it was for you..

  • @jitendrapardeshi3848
    @jitendrapardeshi3848 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Amazing video! excellent knowledge for those who are unaware of this fact!! what are the names of the books.

    • @akshaytelang3102
      @akshaytelang3102 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      solstice at panipat, the era of bajirao

  • @theritualist5175
    @theritualist5175 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant talk sir

  • @sanjayv8467
    @sanjayv8467 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    With all due respect to you Kulkarniji, it is now time that we ditch Grant Duff. He pretended to be neutral but in those days that is 1826 when the History by Grant Duff came out, it had to be vetted and screened by cunning disciples of Richard Wellesley, namely John Malcolm, Mountstuart Elphinstone, Arthur Wellesley and some new disciples.

  • @params5955
    @params5955 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for introducing us to The great maratha warriors.!! So much bloodshed..

  • @vipulsankpal967
    @vipulsankpal967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Maratha history need more research and awareness to people of this country

  • @theybecameus
    @theybecameus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jai Shree Ram 🚩🔥💪👌

  • @shrinand13
    @shrinand13 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    🚩SHRIMANT BAJIRAO PESHWE🚩

    • @zain9109
      @zain9109 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      BAJIRAO apni lulli chatwa raha tha
      If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers. Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.

  • @rdhiray1
    @rdhiray1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative lecture

  • @artikishore8988
    @artikishore8988 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir..this information is very enlightening,your narration n knowledge is amazing..thank u sir .. truly appreciate..stay safe 🙏

  • @kumarjitdutta9627
    @kumarjitdutta9627 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    splendid lecture....

  • @viggy7856
    @viggy7856 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A very informative lecture. Great job 👍

  • @livintraveller2542
    @livintraveller2542 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    there is only one god to us - chattrapati Shivaji, and we all carry his legacy

  • @SantoshChavan-xc6oe
    @SantoshChavan-xc6oe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice information .

  • @mangeshkawade5323
    @mangeshkawade5323 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    He translated ninad bedekar's speech literally

  • @viky116
    @viky116 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic

  • @kulbirsingh4997
    @kulbirsingh4997 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video!!!!

  • @aashiq-e-fazool
    @aashiq-e-fazool 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    नेहरू जी ने अपनी पुस्तक भारत एक खोज में लिखा है कि इस्लाम युद्ध हिंसा व वर्चस्व स्थापित करने के लिए अधिक उपयुक्त मज़हब है बजाय के मानसिक आत्मिक शांति के।

  • @mrudulap7750
    @mrudulap7750 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @missionaryavart113
    @missionaryavart113 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Har har mahadev

  • @viyer3389
    @viyer3389 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This fellow Dr. Kulkarni is an apologetic to the foreigners. The past must not be forgotten. All profits and abuse be be given reparations to the descendants of the victims of that time. Cruelty was always wrong and was against their own respective religious beliefs and their systems.

    • @ud1976
      @ud1976 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is a bizarre comment about Surgeon Commander Uday Kulkarni formerly of the Indian Navy and now the premier historian of Maratha history.

  • @anushreenaik7790
    @anushreenaik7790 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just have one say, Sir, should we not mention Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj as Maharaj Or Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj? We cannot in our dreams just mention him as Shivaji.

  • @bountifulish
    @bountifulish 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thankyou sir, learnt a lot, our text books tell till aurangjeb and then British period starts. Shame on such historians. One question if anyone can clarify, when Marathas were having such a hold on dieing Mughals, were sanatanies still paying jajia tax?

    • @sankettambe440
      @sankettambe440 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope... No Taxes were paid ..
      INSTEAD MARATHAS USED TO PROVIDE HIGH SECURITY OF MARATHA ARMY TO VISIT DHARMIK LOCATIONS ..KASHI VISHVESHWAR TEMPLE TODAY IS BUILD BY MARATHAS (PUNYASHLOK AHILYABAI HOLKAR)

    • @bountifulish
      @bountifulish 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sankettambe440 thanks.

  • @aniketpatil6862
    @aniketpatil6862 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Destroying mosques is not ideology of SHIVAJI MAHARAJ.

  • @blackkiteboy
    @blackkiteboy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Adi Shankaracharya lived in 6th century BC and not 8 th century AD

    • @rohitadhatrao6877
      @rohitadhatrao6877 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      any documents for this ? i am asking genuinely ? would love to read if any references ?

    • @ishansharma9662
      @ishansharma9662 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most history books talk about 8th century.

  • @aniketpatil6862
    @aniketpatil6862 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We talk a lot about SHIVAJI MAHARAJ'S battles but we never talk about SHIVAJI MAHARAJ'S ideology of SWARAJ . First of all SHIVAJI MAHARAJ was not against Islam .we know that Shivaji Maharaj killed Afzal Khan but do you know that Noor Khan baig a Muslim was the commander of Shivaji Maharaj's army during this incident. I am reading in comments that many people are madly saying that Shivaji Maharaj wanted to destroy mosques which is not true even if today you visit Shivaji Maharaj's forts you can see that there are mosques on that forts where muslim soldiers of maratha army used to pray.
    Shivaji Maharaj was a very tollerant towards all religion.
    SWARAJYA basically implement's our rule people's rule which is the base of today's concept of democracy.
    Destroying mosques is ideology of today's extremist HINDUWADI's but SHIVAJI MAHARAJ never wanted to destroy mosques

  • @Amitsharma-ns7pb
    @Amitsharma-ns7pb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thunderbear sent me here

  • @raghavendrakuttabadkar594
    @raghavendrakuttabadkar594 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mr kulkarni adi shankaracharya was born in 507 BC not 8th century Ad and did established mutts in his 32 years of lifetime

  • @amolamol9825
    @amolamol9825 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    हिंदीतून आहे

  • @AA-tg3zr
    @AA-tg3zr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Looks like the Marathas though excelled in land based warriors their negligence of their navy and management of finances seems to have led to their eventual downfall

    • @dad8961
      @dad8961 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The main cultprit of their demise was that they had started fighting within themselves by the 19th century.

    • @akshaytelang3102
      @akshaytelang3102 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Marathas lost the whole second line of leadership in 3rd battle of panipat ... there was a vaccum of leadership on the maratha side.... adding to this, inefficient Peshwa and sardars of confederacy made maratha empire even weak .... they started fighting among themselves (Battle of Poona) , they fought with British separately in 2nd anglo matratha war and were defeated ...had they fought together the history of India would have been different

    • @youtubemix3783
      @youtubemix3783 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mihir zzz Britishers published list of top 20 navy admirals out of that 17 were Britishers, 2 were french and 1 indian TULOJI ANGRE MARATHA NAVY ADMIRAL....HE WERE AT NO.1......but one of the peshwa with the help of britisher end the life of one of the best admiral and maratha navy.

    • @naturaltherapy1389
      @naturaltherapy1389 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mihir zzz Please read about Kanhoji Angre and his naval expeditions. Had it not been for the Marathas the portugese would have converted the whole of Maharashtra to Chriatianity..

    • @RohitSharma-mi8gt
      @RohitSharma-mi8gt 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Mihir zzz yess..funny enough the europeans came to india (cochin) to learn navigational techniques and methods of timekeeping. Marathas I think never conquered Cochin and calicut. All the science at that time was being done there. For the north was plundered by repeated islamic invasions

  • @shakuntlashukla3683
    @shakuntlashukla3683 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please sir please 🙏 conversation in hindi

  • @aniketrokde2401
    @aniketrokde2401 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can not believe that Rajput kings were into such conversation with a Peshwa....as kings don't talk to subordinates

    • @laxendrachauhan8202
      @laxendrachauhan8202 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Peshwa was 2nd highest person after shahu , later it is peshwas who took power of Maratha Empire.

  • @bhuvanc4992
    @bhuvanc4992 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mistake of the Marathas and of the Hindus in general was not to make any effort to understand the nature and doctrine of Islam. It is staggering stupidity to consider the Mughals as 'Bhartiya' after all their atrocities on Hindus and Sikhs, and put the Maratha arms at their disposal.

  • @Baargu
    @Baargu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Baji Rao was perhaps the greatest Indian warrior and general...alas he loved money more than the country or culture...
    Marathas under him acted like Mongols..raiding for money....
    People in south even south Maharashtra...faced excessive taxation due to the chautai...not to mention destruction of crops and villages during the raids..

    • @ud1976
      @ud1976 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Baargu you didn’t hear the talk?

    • @Maharashtra_Dharma
      @Maharashtra_Dharma 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😂😂where you have heard that....please hear the talk carefully

  • @yallappadambal5316
    @yallappadambal5316 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In Karnataka i recently heard that Martha's looted the temples in Karnataka . Shringeri Math also not Spared .Girish karnada was also present in debate on the subject of controversial TIPU SULTAN jayanthi. Please explain is it happened Hindu king looted Hindu temple.? Some panellists supported Hyder and Tipu with their narrative.

    • @vamsikrishna3855
      @vamsikrishna3855 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      No it was looted by marathas but by thugs and marathas have to apologize to shrringeri matt, don't listen to the commie bastards.

    • @Hitman-ho1yl
      @Hitman-ho1yl 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      yallappa dambal i don't think this is true may be this history told by communist or vampanthi..............we built kolhapur mahalaxmi temple,tuljapur bhavani temple after afzal khan invasion shaistekhan invasion..........Marathas stood up for Hinduism and temples why the hell they will loot own religion temples ?
      Infact karnatak land was very helpfull after death of Chatrapati Sambhaji maharaj's murder.......because if rest family wasn't came to karnataka , whole Maratha empire royal family (first and last hindu empire) could be dead by 10 lakhs of Muslim soldiers of Aurangzeb on Raigad Fort (western ghat).

    • @Hitman-ho1yl
      @Hitman-ho1yl 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yallappa dambal actually Tipu sultan ,hyder these all used to kidnap all hindu daughters married women and used to sell them as whore in arab countries........ they used to send all girls through Goa to gulf countries..........even little boys also they sold.........Muslims were worst only they are glorified in our history in whole India........except Maharashtra Marathi medium books

    • @animax1034
      @animax1034 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      no way man marathas rebuilt hundreds of temples that were destroyed my muslims throughtout the india there is no way they would loot their own temples what does that mean man is looting in his own house? only muslims are capable of doing that

    • @lalitmulay2851
      @lalitmulay2851 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      1) First of all these commies historians should give dates & documentary proofs.They have a habit of joining any dots with anybody 2) Still We can accept that some Marathas might have looted 1 or 2 temples because there are bad people/ Traitors in all communities 3) There is also a chance that they might have looted with diffrrent context for example the head of temple might be supporting Hyder Ali or Tipu Sultan by giving temple money/wealth to these invaders for protection . The action is not important the intention is . If you killed somebody for your self defence it is punya. If you killed somebody for your selfish reason It is a paap.

  • @zain9109
    @zain9109 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers. Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.

  • @sabgyl08
    @sabgyl08 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    This is extremely beautiful. It's like poetry to my ears. Very lucid narration of history.
    No biases, and a healthy disclaimer in the beginning.
    Thank you sir, and a lot of respect for all the time you must have spent in reaching this place where you can narrate the story like the back of your hand.
    ...ghutne se ghutna, jhangon se jhang...

    • @zain9109
      @zain9109 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers. Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.

    • @nareshjadhav6834
      @nareshjadhav6834 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@zain9109hmmm , some people accepted desert cult due to fear of sword , their children are proud of that cult today ! Btw , how many monuments were built by mugals in Arabia ? The cult that forced your forefathers to convert with the tip of sword , snathed buildings of your forefathers which now you are claiming beautiful , were present before desert cult !

  • @AA-tg3zr
    @AA-tg3zr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    why were Mughals given all this respect after all the atrocities? seems like an extreme case of Stockholm syndrome

    • @vik8860
      @vik8860 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Mihir zzz it's not some syndrome. Its a well designed process to take to conclusion an unfinished agenda.
      The weeping out of heathenism and its replacement .

    • @lighthouseinvestments2168
      @lighthouseinvestments2168 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      when you kill the capacity of opponent to rule, you become the only choice of ruling. mugals were Congress of that time, we had no options

    • @rohitadhatrao6877
      @rohitadhatrao6877 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      no, it is because of the hindu hating marxist historians like romila thapar, mukherjee, panicker, habib, kosambi, etc etc after 1969 when they rewrote our history textbooks

    • @animax1034
      @animax1034 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @A A it was because of the promise that aurangajeb made before he died and chatrapati shahu maharaj accepted it that even if mughals gets defeated in delhi and lost 100% they will not let chugtai family to extinct so the only role here left for mughals family was to survive and live life but the true rulers were marathas of delhi

    • @chetanbandekar3338
      @chetanbandekar3338 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I heard Muslim thinker vedio that all Mughals are from Hindu mother, this may be one of the reason, but not sure.

  • @Maharashtra_Dharma
    @Maharashtra_Dharma 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    🚩🚩SHRIMANT BAJIRAO PESHWE🚩🚩
    Greatest cavalry general 🙏🙏

  • @xhloro
    @xhloro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Those who forget their history, history forgets them.

  • @venkaalful
    @venkaalful 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Very informative।।।

  • @minato.namekaze.47
    @minato.namekaze.47 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just great! Loved it.

  • @rishivashista6714
    @rishivashista6714 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loved the lecture ❤

  • @swatit9372
    @swatit9372 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent 👌👍

  • @marutigurav9996
    @marutigurav9996 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Uday sir for giving the this history...

  • @sannoshukla7141
    @sannoshukla7141 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good talk👍