This conversation doesn’t seem to be as much of an indictment of Trump as Eric might like. I really don’t see, aside from the president’s vulgarity, why Eric dislikes him so much.
HornedGod Trump wants -- out of Afghanistan -- NATO to pay their way - jobs for Americans not Hondurans -- to bring back supply chains from America’s enemies -- nations media - and public airwaves to belong to Americans -- wants entrenched DC bureaucrats out of power -- wants the Fed to work for US , not the fed families Gosh, I wonder why the establishment has brain washed even these bright men to hate him
Agreed. He is a smart guy with a huge blind spot where Trump sits despite what he says. I like Eric and Bret - but the contempt these two have (Bret's laughter) for anyone not as smart as they are takes away from their message. Crap - I just showed my own blind spot ... The other thing: Most Americans don't go through their day focused on the presidency.
@@Chris-ji4iu: Or if someone fails to grasp their point which was based on a false premise. Eric was recently on The Verdict with Ted Cruz, and his annoyance and sense of superiority were palpable. More so, perhaps, because he saw his appearance on the show as a favor. I think he doesn't have as much fun on a daily basis as either Michael Knowles or Ted Cruz. The only episode I've seen, and probably the last, since Ted Cruz should really be working for his constituents rather than doing a podcast.
well, that whole "We Are The World" ensemble exposed THEMSELVES for being frauds...... because the narrative was offcourse "this ain't about money, it's about helping"...... well, the moment Ronnie James Dio executed the idea of doing a Heavy Metal version of that, all those mainstream cunts from WATW started bitching about it, consumed by envy :D:D shaming and ridiculing them for not being "commercially relevant" enough basically :D if it was about helping, they would be happy, somone else is adding help to the issue..... instead they got exposed and we could see it's just pandering and virtue-signalling...... granted, both projects still made a lot of money and helped some people...... but, if the intention is not there, those idiots have ZERO ground to complain about any morals and ethics
'I don't see the lowest echelons of American society helping Mexican peasant with their votes' --Eric Weinstein . Thank you!!!!!! And there is nothing racist about using your vote in your own self interest or the interest of your own country. It's called democracy!
9 conservative justices = a Supreme Court that strictly adheres to the constitution and federal laws written by our elected representatives. Oh, the humanity! Having said that, the Weinsteins' are national treasures.
If they are going to have indoctrination from all of entertainment, all of the educational system from kindergarten up (including cartoons now teaching preschool kids to be “woke” BLMers), and all biased social media and internet sources, yeah-we need 9 with heads on straight to sort out all the sht coming downstream from that
Well said. We already know Eric’s POV on most of these issues. Don’t know what the point is of having guests on The Portal if all you’re going to do is filibuster them.
@@joshhart8722 I guess it depends on the point of your podcast which may vary from person to person. If there's ever to be a guy not giving a fuck about that Im glad it's a guy like Eric Weinstein. If that's somehow the thing you take away from this there's 100 great podcasts out there that runs more on great interviewing style not interrupting ect. I sure don't listen to the portal to not hear people get interrupted... This is about more than good conversation flow.
@@tominl.a.1582 I wonder if you link this to the discussion following the Dark Horse clip th-cam.com/video/XxlVAbc1Vjo/w-d-xo.html The Taleb paradox: If I censor myself I hobble you. Insidious. Absurdist. JBP escapes this, noting in play we prefer good winners.
@@BlacksmithTWD there are no descendants of Neanderthals....I'm sure you know that and there is some clever point your trying to make in that but I don't know what it is.
When it comes to despised personality traits, nothing seems to irritate people as easily as "smug superiority". So, in a forum of your preference, state something clearly ignorant or absurd, but (sometimes) cleverly disguised as sincere. Wait for the inevitable reaction. Proceed to mock and provoke the people who feel the need to point out to everybody else just how wrong you are. No matter how silly you behave, the smug-superior people end up looking like fools in the end, to the silent majority. Then, become the President of the United States of America.
I just arrived here upon seeing a link with Easton Ellis' name. I watched till 13:55 and based on who was speaking the most I still hadn't figured out if Easton Ellis had a show and was the host or if he was the guest Weinstein's show.
He is lying here. Here is his wife: th-cam.com/video/3_7Hyk1rvRQ/w-d-xo.html Eric sometimes mentions it. Eric have done all the Economic consulting for the Federal Government. * We have outsourced all Engeneering jobs. We have Fat Studies now. We are oppressed by Engeneers. The Chinese Grandmas are making the custom CPUs & MBs.
I have seen very little of his material. But what I have seen was science based topics... and then I seen this and literally feel the same way immediately. It's like he is trying, to not try, to offend while saying something he is obviously trying to say. I know that sounds crazy and it should, I do not like when intelligent people stoop for such reasons, it shows just exactly what they're intentions are and automatically shows bad intentions.
I can follow a portion of the thoughts of Eric, but I get overwhelmed at points. However, from the position statements he has made, I can agree with him. Basically, he and many of us are finding ourselves in an intellectual mine field not knowing how to get out safely to the truth, how to recognize the truth how to support the truth. We must not worship false Gods, we must be faithful to the basic ethical positions we have garnered from generations of thought and action. If we forsake the truth we may wander forever in No Man's Land ever fearful of a Kafka-like surreal world too horrible to contemplate.
Question for Eric: I don't know if I'm Conservative or Liberal. I'm interested in conserving the American Dream as embodied in the Declaration of Independence. OK. That's in some way Conservative. However, the Declaration is such a radical document of societal structure, it's still called "The Great Experiment." Is wanting to "conserve" a radical change of governance considered "Conservative?" This is in reference to your (seeming) repugnance of the idea of 9 conservative justices on the Supreme Court. If those "conservative" justices are conserving the axiomatic underpinning of the American Ideal (...all men are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights...that Governments are instituted among men, in order to conserve those rights, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..." is that really such a bad thing?
I hope you understand the Enlightenment was a left-wing movement in its time (conservatives being pro-conserving of the monarchy and aristocracy) and America was a left-wing experiment. The political dynamic was different at the time because Marxism didn't even exist. Many leftists see their ideologies as an extension and fulfillment of the Enlightenment NOT a rejection of it. You should really read up on some of this stuff before assuming you are conservative for aligning with the ideals of the Enlightenment, the founders and democracy.
Conservative is not a static point. Just as progressive/liberal are non static. Certainly there are more forces at work in our society but mostly these. They, indeed, need each other to move forward. Picking a ‘side’, right or wrong, to an obvious detriment, is nowhere to stand in a republic.
Trump is the only one willing and capable of stopping them from going that far Eric but he says things in a slightly mean way so I guess we have to pay reparations.
it's so tiring that the Google algorithms only give us the 'thumbs up' comments that fit our political biases. I would like to see both the Left and Right comments.
"im anti anti anti Trump" you get me Eric, we're on the same level of contrarianism. everyone, who spend all day paying attention to his every word and then freaks out about it, is doing it wrong. i stopped caring about the things he says in mid-2016 (and even started to agree with some of them) mostly because of the media hysteria.
Eric, I'm Jesse's friend, the piano tech who worked with you and Elew. You are spot on. It's a bit of self flattery, but I believe very similar thoughts to you. It's impossible to speak about any of this without igniting a firestorm of self immolation. If I have to listen to another self hating person prattle on about White Fragility, I'll commit ritual Seppuku;-)
@Tarzan so many of these intellectual types identity the problem so well, but refuse to endorse trump even though it is the only logical conclusion to their thinking.
PLEASE tell us just how TRUSTWORTHY Hillary is. I'm waiting. We've had four years of these CLAIMS Trump was in bed with Russia with nothing found led by an incompetent investigator, impeachment rammed through the House, being spied on by a sitting president and now we find out Obama WAS involved. Do you live under a rock? So it's okay to spy on another party while an election is going on? Based on the claims by a ex-British spy? Who knew it was all bogus? With a dossier that was bought and paid for by the DNC? Keep thinking whatever you want and you'll enjoy four more years of Trump. We "common folk" are tired of these elites who seem to think they know better than us. Good luck with that.
Re: child holocaust survivor and reparations: It's not about the individual person's deeds, but it's about the responsibility of a nation. One would think that a lad of Weinstein's caliber knew that this is exactly how the German govt justifies it's extensive support for Israel.
Hillary was a terrible Dem nominee. She was tethered to an enormous amount of political and personal baggage much of which she created. Trump, on the other hand, demagogued his way into the heart of America’s blue collar voter from our own Brexit states: PA, MI, FL, and OH.
You know how people do these funny videos where they splice the screen and get Jordan Peterson arguing with Jordan Peterson or Trump arguing with Trump? Well, that would be Weinstein's perfect interview.
The hatred for Trump felt like a cult as the election came closer in 2016. As a centrist I would inquire what in particular they hated. Some were reasonable, but their reaction seemed disproportional, or their statements were completely unmoored from reality
Regards what Eric struggled to term and referred to as something like 'idealism of a time which is a false narrative to hide how people make money' is addressed at length by Thomas Piketty in Capital and Ideology and what he refers to as 'inequality regimes'.
I don't have much respect for Leftists, but I do respect Bret and Eric Weinstein. It's fascinating to hear them present reasonable ideas that focus on the concern of the underpriviledged without being screeched about how I'm a racist and that total government control of every aspect of life is the only possible answer. Nice to hear the other side from reasonable people.
@@brianjoyce9040 There is a choice. He just doesn't like it. What I hear when people say that is, "I just want to win but my team won't win this time so taking my ball home." Hell I'm going to seriously vote for Kanye. It's the none of the above choice.
@@brianjoyce9040 That's a pipedream. I don't think that will happen but I hope I'm wrong. It's just so funny that Eric is going to give up his agency on voting because he knows he's not going to get what he wants.
ZombieHero --dreams are what we make of them, I’ll keep on dreaming for a better world. Then take what is available. Biden and Pres Trump are embarrassing choices, to me
Eric - today this was a little shallow. Not your usual high quality product. I also feel some people listen to Trump with ears from another planet. Does everyone take all Trump says out of context ? I must be naive!
Watch the real Eric. He is kind of afraid to talk about his views. Here is his (ex)-wife. th-cam.com/video/3_7Hyk1rvRQ/w-d-xo.html And Eric is the real deal.
“If I wanted to win an ere-.... election” gold
I think he was combining election and re-election.
I caught that too 😂
George 😂😂
Ester Hudson I still can’t stop laughing cos Brett is soooooo smart so it’s a hilarious Freudian slip
Wrong brother; it’s Eric.
If you invite Bret Easton Ellis to speak on your podcast consider letting Bret Easton Ellis speak.
Leftists do not let others speak.
Exactly.
This conversation doesn’t seem to be as much of an indictment of Trump as Eric might like. I really don’t see, aside from the president’s vulgarity, why Eric dislikes him so much.
HornedGod Trump wants
-- out of Afghanistan
-- NATO to pay their way
- jobs for Americans not Hondurans
-- to bring back supply chains from America’s enemies
-- nations media - and public airwaves to belong to Americans
-- wants entrenched DC bureaucrats out of power
-- wants the Fed to work for US , not the fed families
Gosh, I wonder why the establishment has brain washed even these bright men to hate him
@@jackthomsen7197: good points all.
Agreed. He is a smart guy with a huge blind spot where Trump sits despite what he says. I like Eric and Bret - but the contempt these two have (Bret's laughter) for anyone not as smart as they are takes away from their message. Crap - I just showed my own blind spot ...
The other thing: Most Americans don't go through their day focused on the presidency.
@@Chris-ji4iu: Or if someone fails to grasp their point which was based on a false premise. Eric was recently on The Verdict with Ted Cruz, and his annoyance and sense of superiority were palpable. More so, perhaps, because he saw his appearance on the show as a favor. I think he doesn't have as much fun on a daily basis as either Michael Knowles or Ted Cruz. The only episode I've seen, and probably the last, since Ted Cruz should really be working for his constituents rather than doing a podcast.
Weinstein is a “genius-in-charge” intellectual who has no experience being in charge, which is why he bucks Orwell and uses words like milieu ....
That bit about "We Are the World" is spot on.
He’s not just mad he didn’t get invited to sing with Michael Jackson and all the celebs?
well, that whole "We Are The World" ensemble exposed THEMSELVES for being frauds...... because the narrative was offcourse "this ain't about money, it's about helping"...... well, the moment Ronnie James Dio executed the idea of doing a Heavy Metal version of that, all those mainstream cunts from WATW started bitching about it, consumed by envy :D:D shaming and ridiculing them for not being "commercially relevant" enough basically :D if it was about helping, they would be happy, somone else is adding help to the issue..... instead they got exposed and we could see it's just pandering and virtue-signalling...... granted, both projects still made a lot of money and helped some people...... but, if the intention is not there, those idiots have ZERO ground to complain about any morals and ethics
'I don't see the lowest echelons of American society helping Mexican peasant with their votes' --Eric Weinstein . Thank you!!!!!! And there is nothing racist about using your vote in your own self interest or the interest of your own country. It's called democracy!
Just dont vote, Eric!!!! No biden!!!
We have a media that tells the truth? Please send a link
Do you want 9 conservative supreme court justices?
Yes.
9 conservative justices = a Supreme Court that strictly adheres to the constitution and federal laws written by our elected representatives. Oh, the humanity!
Having said that, the Weinsteins' are national treasures.
A liberal court would just be another house of congress, except less accountable to the people.
If they are going to have indoctrination from all of entertainment, all of the educational system from kindergarten up (including cartoons now teaching preschool kids to be “woke” BLMers), and all biased social media and internet sources, yeah-we need 9 with heads on straight to sort out all the sht coming downstream from that
How about 9 constructioist judges, whether liberal conservative or other?
@@jessef7429 if you say so.
I love Eric but he needs to understand we want hear what his guests have to say, not just himself
Idk, Eric has some really entertaining thoughts.
"I didn't want to pay that much to get rid of Trump" - first time I've laughed out loud in a while
Good video, but darn if I remember Ellis getting to say anything
Well said. We already know Eric’s POV on most of these issues. Don’t know what the point is of having guests on The Portal if all you’re going to do is filibuster them.
@@joshhart8722 my *sense* is that Eric rises to the occasion, is more interesting according to his opinion of the putative interlocutor
@@joshhart8722 I guess it depends on the point of your podcast which may vary from person to person. If there's ever to be a guy not giving a fuck about that Im glad it's a guy like Eric Weinstein. If that's somehow the thing you take away from this there's 100 great podcasts out there that runs more on great interviewing style not interrupting ect. I sure don't listen to the portal to not hear people get interrupted... This is about more than good conversation flow.
Yes. The host definitely talked too much. Not very professional.
@@tominl.a.1582 I wonder if you link this to the discussion following the Dark Horse clip th-cam.com/video/XxlVAbc1Vjo/w-d-xo.html
The Taleb paradox: If I censor myself I hobble you. Insidious. Absurdist.
JBP escapes this, noting in play we prefer good winners.
"Why don't you tell some child holocaust survivor about paying reparations?" ...damn...well put
Kind of interesting actually considering they recieved reparation themselves.
How about paying reparations to the descendants of the Neanderthals?
@@jaelunar9791 lol.
Oh. Really? I'll have to check the mailbox again.
@@TheCandisr I you trying to imply that Jews haven't recieved reparations in various forms, going back to 1952?
@@BlacksmithTWD there are no descendants of Neanderthals....I'm sure you know that and there is some clever point your trying to make in that but I don't know what it is.
When it comes to despised personality traits, nothing seems to irritate people as easily as "smug superiority".
So, in a forum of your preference, state something clearly ignorant or absurd, but (sometimes) cleverly disguised as sincere. Wait for the inevitable reaction. Proceed to mock and provoke the people who feel the need to point out to everybody else just how wrong you are. No matter how silly you behave, the smug-superior people end up looking like fools in the end, to the silent majority.
Then, become the President of the United States of America.
I just arrived here upon seeing a link with Easton Ellis' name. I watched till 13:55 and based on who was speaking the most I still hadn't figured out if Easton Ellis had a show and was the host or if he was the guest Weinstein's show.
Great conversation. Thanks
Wouldn't have been funny if his millennial boyfriend, he likes to reference, voted for Trump but just gave him a line of BS about hating Trump.
🤣
I know, right? Enough with millenial BF
Eric is so sassy smart. I love him
He is lying here.
Here is his wife:
th-cam.com/video/3_7Hyk1rvRQ/w-d-xo.html
Eric sometimes mentions it.
Eric have done all the Economic consulting for the Federal Government.
*
We have outsourced all Engeneering jobs.
We have Fat Studies now.
We are oppressed by Engeneers.
The Chinese Grandmas are making the custom CPUs & MBs.
and blindsided but happy he grew a pair.
and no doubt brilliant.
My goodness this guy makes so much sense and lays it out intellectualy, yet accessible.
BEE didn't have a single opportunity to speak. Eric has guests on so that they can listen to HIM talk
I could not stop looking at the window and think of ivory tower.great view
Every time I listen to Eric Weinstein discuss politics I completely forget he's a genius.
Samuel Thomson - Me too! I enjoy him, but he is soooo invested in his image as a liberal Jew, he doesn’t see the goodness of the evangelical right.
I have seen very little of his material. But what I have seen was science based topics... and then I seen this and literally feel the same way immediately. It's like he is trying, to not try, to offend while saying something he is obviously trying to say. I know that sounds crazy and it should, I do not like when intelligent people stoop for such reasons, it shows just exactly what they're intentions are and automatically shows bad intentions.
I can follow a portion of the thoughts of Eric, but I get overwhelmed at points. However, from the position statements he has made, I can agree with him. Basically, he and many of us are finding ourselves in an intellectual mine field not knowing how to get out safely to the truth, how to recognize the truth how to support the truth. We must not worship false Gods, we must be faithful to the basic ethical positions we have garnered from generations of thought and action. If we forsake the truth we may wander forever in No Man's Land ever fearful of a Kafka-like surreal world too horrible to contemplate.
The Mr. Blonde analogy works great!
It does! I've never heard scholars use Reservoir Dogs as a political analogy. So cool.
I like Eric, very good thinker. I don’t agree with him on all things, but I enjoy his conversations. Nice!
Question for Eric: I don't know if I'm Conservative or Liberal. I'm interested in conserving the American Dream as embodied in the Declaration of Independence. OK. That's in some way Conservative. However, the Declaration is such a radical document of societal structure, it's still called "The Great Experiment." Is wanting to "conserve" a radical change of governance considered "Conservative?"
This is in reference to your (seeming) repugnance of the idea of 9 conservative justices on the Supreme Court. If those "conservative" justices are conserving the axiomatic underpinning of the American Ideal (...all men are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights...that Governments are instituted among men, in order to conserve those rights, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..." is that really such a bad thing?
Soo this is a legitimate good question. I felt also a question when he mentioned those judges. You just wrote down what that question should be.
I hope you understand the Enlightenment was a left-wing movement in its time (conservatives being pro-conserving of the monarchy and aristocracy) and America was a left-wing experiment. The political dynamic was different at the time because Marxism didn't even exist. Many leftists see their ideologies as an extension and fulfillment of the Enlightenment NOT a rejection of it. You should really read up on some of this stuff before assuming you are conservative for aligning with the ideals of the Enlightenment, the founders and democracy.
Conservative is not a static point. Just as progressive/liberal are non static. Certainly there are more forces at work in our society but mostly these. They, indeed, need each other to move forward. Picking a ‘side’, right or wrong, to an obvious detriment, is nowhere to stand in a republic.
Those 9 justices are preserving the power of the elites
"So now we've got a new paradigm where the only trustworthy person is the least trustworthy person."
I only understand half of what this man says and I'm already terrified.
Always interesting perspectives! Will have to go back and watch the entire episode
If you put ND gels on those windows this set would look great.
That Mr. Blonde analogy was perfect
Thanks for the great content Eric! Keep it coming!
Thes guys could discuss a peanut butter and jam sandwich for two hours and not arrive at the conclusion that it’s delicious.
Trump is the only one willing and capable of stopping them from going that far Eric but he says things in a slightly mean way so I guess we have to pay reparations.
haha 😂
it's so tiring that the Google algorithms only give us the 'thumbs up' comments that fit our political biases. I would like to see both the Left and Right comments.
It's too bad Weinstein won't let Bret talk.
"im anti anti anti Trump"
you get me Eric, we're on the same level of contrarianism.
everyone, who spend all day paying attention to his every word and then freaks out about it, is doing it wrong.
i stopped caring about the things he says in mid-2016 (and even started to agree with some of them) mostly because of the media hysteria.
3 negatives equal a negative.
What is best for America, is best fir Trump.
"pyramid schemes are collapsing' - scary thought if there ever was one.
The entire private equity system is basically a pyramid scheme.
Some people are disproportionately antagonized by Donald Trump. The alternative to Trump is worse.
Eric, I'm Jesse's friend, the piano tech who worked with you and Elew. You are spot on. It's a bit of self flattery, but I believe very similar thoughts to you. It's impossible to speak about any of this without igniting a firestorm of self immolation. If I have to listen to another self hating person prattle on about White Fragility, I'll commit ritual Seppuku;-)
Let someone else talk Eric
Brilliant take, and ‘my truth’, you speak of.
Trump as mr. Blonde was a fantastic, hilarious take. Still voting trump 2020 fo sho do
@Tarzan so many of these intellectual types identity the problem so well, but refuse to endorse trump even though it is the only logical conclusion to their thinking.
Eric is very smart in a very limited way.
It shows just how deep it goes in my reluctance to share this video clip...
Why the off color language? Someone this brilliant is more than capable of communicating in more descriptive terms.
Wow what a fascinating conversation.
This author is responsible for one of the greatest books and movies of all time.
Brilliant analysis
The most trustworthy person is the least trust worthy person. Class.
PLEASE tell us just how TRUSTWORTHY Hillary is. I'm waiting. We've had four years of these CLAIMS Trump was in bed with Russia with nothing found led by an incompetent investigator, impeachment rammed through the House, being spied on by a sitting president and now we find out Obama WAS involved. Do you live under a rock? So it's okay to spy on another party while an election is going on? Based on the claims by a ex-British spy? Who knew it was all bogus? With a dossier that was bought and paid for by the DNC?
Keep thinking whatever you want and you'll enjoy four more years of Trump. We "common folk" are tired of these elites who seem to think they know better than us. Good luck with that.
@@chuckcribbs3398 To the 2nd home in the Hamptons set Hilary was very trustworthy.
Re: child holocaust survivor and reparations: It's not about the individual person's deeds, but it's about the responsibility of a nation. One would think that a lad of Weinstein's caliber knew that this is exactly how the German govt justifies it's extensive support for Israel.
No-one alive today is responsible for what someone did 150 years ago. It's ridiculous. The left has become a joke.
@@JensHove Wen interessiert schon das erbaermliche Gestammel eines rechtsradikalen Kleinbuergers?
@@JensHove agreed
If you get an ND filter for those cameras the background probably wont be washed out.
Hillary was a terrible Dem nominee. She was tethered to an enormous amount of political and personal baggage much of which she created.
Trump, on the other hand, demagogued his way into the heart of America’s blue collar voter from our own Brexit states: PA, MI, FL, and OH.
You know how people do these funny videos where they splice the screen and get Jordan Peterson arguing with Jordan Peterson or Trump arguing with Trump? Well, that would be Weinstein's perfect interview.
Brilliant!!!!
that was very interesting thanks
The hatred for Trump felt like a cult as the election came closer in 2016. As a centrist I would inquire what in particular they hated. Some were reasonable, but their reaction seemed disproportional, or their statements were completely unmoored from reality
ChristianBolt and it’s only gotten worse
It’s a projection of their own insecurities and personal problems on to another person. Very bizarre and disconcerting to see it for yourself.
I still want Kelsey Grammer, in his testiest Frasier voice, to sing "Nu CLE ar!... that's how you pronounce it, nu CLE ar!..." to the tune of "Maria".
once we start tearing down statues where do we stop? #Bravo
The problem is the only person that is trying to stop tearing down of statues Eric doesn't like because he says things mean sometimes
Hopefully before throwing people off of roofs for their orientation? Why did you bring up the Islamic State, though? ;)
Can somebody please help me? I can't stand Trump AND I can't stand the protesters.
Oh don’t worry Eric, you are not alone in this hell.
Just discovered this channel. I've gone through about 10 clips in the last hour.. it's genius
Your thoughts....Bravo 👌
Trump won because he speaks up for Americans
"The DAVOS idealism is cratering because it was a wealth transfer program posing as a philanthropic effort."
Regards what Eric struggled to term and referred to as something like 'idealism of a time which is a false narrative to hide how people make money' is addressed at length by Thomas Piketty in Capital and Ideology and what he refers to as 'inequality regimes'.
Why have a guest if you don’t let him talk?
Eric, you got Trump totally correct!!
18.18 minute clip and BEE speaks for maybe 3 / 4 minutes.
The confidence to wear Adidas sweatpants in that situation.
I don't have much respect for Leftists, but I do respect Bret and Eric Weinstein. It's fascinating to hear them present reasonable ideas that focus on the concern of the underpriviledged without being screeched about how I'm a racist and that total government control of every aspect of life is the only possible answer. Nice to hear the other side from reasonable people.
The ads interspersing are, well... you guys need the money?
Eric gets better & better!
Haha, he wanted to say errection, I am an adult
So Erik wants Biden.....yuck!!!
He doesn’t want Biden. He, as do many, want a choice. We have been denied that is what he is expounding on.
@@brianjoyce9040 There is a choice. He just doesn't like it. What I hear when people say that is, "I just want to win but my team won't win this time so taking my ball home."
Hell I'm going to seriously vote for Kanye. It's the none of the above choice.
ZombieHero --that’s a choice I can live with. My hope is a UNITY2020 scenario
@@brianjoyce9040 That's a pipedream. I don't think that will happen but I hope I'm wrong.
It's just so funny that Eric is going to give up his agency on voting because he knows he's not going to get what he wants.
ZombieHero --dreams are what we make of them, I’ll keep on dreaming for a better world. Then take what is available. Biden and Pres Trump are embarrassing choices, to me
he almost said erection instead of election at the start lol love u eric WEINSTEIN WEINSTEIN 2020
People are not that trilled about a candidate, it is moore who do they not like at all.
the subtitles read "mill you" when he said "milieu"
Weinstein almost said, “If I wanted to win an erection...” 😂🤣
Where did you go Eric?
Its like when they miss spell on menues. It is not about being right.
I am confused who is the host on this episode
I think that's the idea.
@@timkunkel5431 Sure, but sometimes I feel he's a tad rude not letting his guest speak as much
This Nucular-Nuclear example is just strange but I do get his point
You would think a man as genius as Weinstein could find someone better than Fred Flintstone’s barber.
I could only last that lumpy pile of dough trying to sound intellectual for 2:45.
Eric Weinstein interviewing Eric Weinstein...thank you
How does this analysis correlate with Jordon Peterson's intentionally blind "Osiris"?
Eric - today this was a little shallow. Not your usual high quality product. I also feel some people listen to Trump with ears from another planet.
Does everyone take all Trump says out of context ? I must be naive!
The reveal of Trump as Mr. Blond was epic. 🤔
I don't think Weinstein realizes that the ponzie scheme he talks about is capitalism.
The beauty of having different opinions!
i really like his mr blonde philosophical approach
Trump lives in Eric's head rent free. Hilarious.
Have you considered the fact that the headquarters of any Major American corporation in your country is the equivalent of a digital green zone?
This man frightens me. Makes way too much sense.
0:02 so close 🤣🤣🤣
I'm against Trump because his good ideas are labeled and articulated and tinged hints at certain emotions, ideas etc......... Sounds good, Eric.
"You can't say the n-word!"
Me: 12:01
Love this.
Watch the real Eric.
He is kind of afraid to talk about his views.
Here is his (ex)-wife.
th-cam.com/video/3_7Hyk1rvRQ/w-d-xo.html
And Eric is the real deal.
would you put a sincere effort into getting Norm Macdonald onto the program?