Should Ash Blossom Be BANNED!?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
  • #yugioh #yugiohtcg #yugiohcommunity #masterduel #yugiohcards #dzeeff #farfa #mbt #yugiohmasterduel #teamaps #breadboyweeb
    Credit to ‪@ExordiodelDuelista‬ • Zoodiac Deck TCG (MARC...

ความคิดเห็น • 553

  • @lanius1084
    @lanius1084 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +126

    hand traps are a horrible way to fix the game. relying on a percent chance to have access to a mechanic that prevents you from auto losing feels just so so bad.

    • @shien-ryu4395
      @shien-ryu4395 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Indeed, a 'just draw the out' phenomenon that gives you the illusion of balance, but in reality it does bigger harm than good. Ash blossom is a symptom of a bad managed game, it shouldn't exist, neither the reasons that was created for.

    • @dxpope7037
      @dxpope7037 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Yet they design cards that ignore those handtraps they created, for instance diabellstar effect of just setting a card, like the player doesn't have to search for the card to find it.

    • @AstralLaVista
      @AstralLaVista 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I think the fix for it is more archtype based hand traps, obviously havnis was broken in tear format but because it was the only card that existed like that, I'd we had like 8 decks that did it it might actually be fun

    • @AstralLaVista
      @AstralLaVista 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@dxpope7037 yeah it's called power creep ash is 7 years old now

    • @FakeHeroFang
      @FakeHeroFang 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @AstralLaVista Hand traps were supposed to knock wombo combo decks down a peg, how does designing around your supposed solution make any sense? You're intentionally creating an arms race of 'problem/solution' but in the worst way possible. You have to make better hand traps to combat the new shit, then new shit that cares even less about hand traps, until everything just says 'your opponent cannot activate cards in response to this effect' or something to that effect. Tenpai and Gimmick Puppets are already toying with the idea that part of your strategy is being completely ignorant and immune to disruption.

  • @danstewy2452
    @danstewy2452 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +158

    Bro is literally mirrorjade in a human suit 😂

  • @kaisim980
    @kaisim980 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    I actually just rediscover the fact that I have an ash blossom irl when I was going through some old cards, it didn't make an impression on my brain back then and its funny now

  • @zacharydobbins6267
    @zacharydobbins6267 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Plus, nice to hear someone else who agrees that this game needs to slow down. Bring fun back to the game

    • @Honest_Mids_Masher
      @Honest_Mids_Masher 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Game is fun though

    • @arrownoir
      @arrownoir 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The fun never left.

    • @dhantefranklin336
      @dhantefranklin336 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You're 8 years too late. Quit the game like I did.

    • @BreadBoyWeeb
      @BreadBoyWeeb  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The game is really fun. I just want some tweaks

    • @S_--
      @S_-- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Or, get this:
      You can have new, popular or already desired formats get implemented alongside fair ban lists and decks that are fully supported without being broken which you can actually have fun by playing.
      As an example, magic the gathering has commander, tell me why wouldn't you want to hypothetically have a 4 player yugioh game? That'd be awesome!
      Another thing to consider, imagine a world without Baronne de fleur or whatever other annoying monster.

  • @STEPHxCA
    @STEPHxCA 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    You know what card doesn't lose to Ash? The Cyber Commander! It has 750 attack points and does nothing :D

  • @BrokeOctopus
    @BrokeOctopus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I used to think Ash Blossom is a necessary evil to stop toxic combos from ending on oppressive boards. But the fact is that nowadays, all the strongest decks just bypass Ash in some way. As a result, Ash is only good against decks that are Rogue tier or lower.
    This is what makes Ash a problem card: every deck can use it, but the weaker decks are hit significantly harder. Ash makes the strong decks stronger and the weak decks weaker. This is unhealthy for the game.
    Not to mention the way Ash is worded makes it way more powerful than people realize. "Negate an effect that *includes* one of the following" allows it to negate effects that don't search just because searching was mentioned somewhere.
    For example, an effect has a choice of A, B, or C, where A is a search but you choose C which is destroying a card, the effect can get negated by Ash despite the fact you're not even searching.
    Or an effect summons from GY then has optional dump from deck to GY, the summon gets negated by Ash even if you choose not to dump.
    Lastly, Ash is just unfun to play against. Her (and her less popular sister Ghost Belle) are just straight negates, and that's lame as hell. Good handtrap design punishes your opponent for overextending. Think Nibiru or Droll. Bad handtrap design is outright negating the first, and possibly only, play your opponent might have.
    Now of course if Ash gets banned, there's quite a few cards that also need to get banned. But to me, this is a good thing because Ash was a band aid fix for those cards to begin with.
    TLDR; Ash deserves to be banned, not because it's strong, but because it kills weaker decks, it's poorly worded and as a result negates things it shouldn't be able to, and it's just a flat out boring card.

    • @shien-ryu4395
      @shien-ryu4395 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly my point. Personally I prefer it limited, for the decks that can search it as an end board piece.

    • @MoskalMedia
      @MoskalMedia 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This 100%. A lot of people keep saying the "necessary evil" argument, but that just lead us to the position we're in today. Ash was so powerful it made the meta decks have to get more powerful and it warped card design, as BreadBoy pointed out.

  • @BreadBoyWeeb
    @BreadBoyWeeb  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    I kept getting copyright striked that's why the video has a bunch of random unrelated gameplay in the background to get around this trash UGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH

    • @jahshinbennett9303
      @jahshinbennett9303 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What are the copyright claims based on?

    • @BreadBoyWeeb
      @BreadBoyWeeb  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@jahshinbennett9303 look at my community note lol. it is unreal

    • @jahshinbennett9303
      @jahshinbennett9303 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BreadBoyWeeb alright

    • @MegaMachiOnline
      @MegaMachiOnline 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ghost Ogre has always been my bestie

    • @Iceyia
      @Iceyia 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@BreadBoyWeeb im glad it seems to be working out now

  • @tonberry2670
    @tonberry2670 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The best pro of banning Ash Blossom is that I'm a Branded player

    • @10tailedbijuu
      @10tailedbijuu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      same here here!!

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is like hearing all the people begging Konami to ban maxx c in Master duel, I'm like: "please do so lmao"

  • @RMSLtnick
    @RMSLtnick 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    ngl i cant really imagine a yugioh at its current pace without ash blossom... decks like branded just getting to pop off for almost free, Altergeist ALWAYS getting that search for multifaker if not just having it off rip and getting a free silq during your turn, dinos... getting to pop da baby for da baby lesss goooo like misc is at 3 WITHOUT EVER SEEING MISC... Gren maju pumping their boss by 4k AND getting to draw 2? Ash is like fucking batman tbh we need ash whether we like it or not

    • @gab4198
      @gab4198 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      We should start baing barone, apollousa and maybe borreload savage, the real problem is generic boss monsters.

    • @0_MikankoChan
      @0_MikankoChan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Dinos dont really Care about Ash If you got a xenoground also in your Hand but nowadays ppl Play Like 24 handtraps wich is absolutely crazy and super unfun to Play against for Branded Just Bann the stupid Fusion and WHO the hell plays alter even dzeef doesnt Play that anymore

    • @randombadchannel8700
      @randombadchannel8700 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@gab4198 Borreload at least requires some semblance of cost in the forms of playing at least 2 links. So you take 3 ED slots and not just be splashed in every deck.

    • @0_MikankoChan
      @0_MikankoChan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@randombadchannel8700 plus savage loses to crow and bystials cause Most links are Dark and crow bannishes anything anyways thats why i dont even think about playing savage anymore. Even in Decks Like pend where you Always Play beyond cause its Just a broken Link two wich you Link away anyways for a Link 3 geting it bannishes by a bystials is super frustrating savage is Just a blue eyes then. The real pain in ygo is Baron the Card has basically No downside and is way to easy to summon

    • @lance2304
      @lance2304 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      We're in a snake eye format, altergeist is the least of your worries...

  • @mrpkmnfrk
    @mrpkmnfrk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I am down for trying to slow down the game a bit

    • @dudono1744
      @dudono1744 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same, I want OTK decks to be a thing, which means that not every deck should be able to OTK.

    • @jjasuka
      @jjasuka 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They tried with the introduction of links and they failed. Yugioh is at a point it to late for it to slow down

    • @MahaXad
      @MahaXad 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@jjasukaThe idea for links was a good thing, implemented horribly.
      They slowed down the game by restricting extra deck summons only to introduce link climbing and link swapping with sky strikers. Konami went against their own design philosophy and look where we ended up, extra combos into full end board on turn 1.

  • @MrMiarne
    @MrMiarne 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Con 3: the feet weirdos would have an all out war to find a new foot fetish icon.

  • @cottonuwu3167
    @cottonuwu3167 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Yes. The bad part of yugioh not having set rotation is that if a card is good enough it can last forever in the meta. Im tired of seeing all deck in the meta be the same handtraps plus whatever archetype. Weve been in a handtrap tier zero for years but nobody has noticed.

    • @danielramsey6141
      @danielramsey6141 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I’ve Noticed! And Hand Traps have both been Beneficial, And Annoying!
      The Worst Part is that Ghost Orge and Ash made even More of These DAMN THINGS!!!
      I seriously want Different Meta Formats, especially when we look back at early 2014 and 2015!

    • @dudono1744
      @dudono1744 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Saying we have a handtrap tier 0 is like saying we have a spell tier 0.

    • @hishamshakdam8718
      @hishamshakdam8718 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You’ve literally just described a card mechanic and said “we see it too much it’s tier zero” might as well say we have a special summon tier zero

    • @neonoah3353
      @neonoah3353 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That is not what "tier 0" means.
      We have been in a meta where handtraps are the best staples.

    • @AmazonessKing01
      @AmazonessKing01 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Staples still exist in set rotations. The solution is just banning garbage like Baronne or Zeus who serve as staple, win condition and boardbreaker.

  • @PhilFromSchool
    @PhilFromSchool 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    i appreciate ash because its necessary to interrupt modern decks. but you're right, if we removed ash, they'd be forced to stop designing around it and/or hit the problematic cards that ash keeps in check
    and cards are already beginning to power creep around it.. i dread the day that ash becomes obsolete

    • @neonoah3353
      @neonoah3353 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So, same argument as maxx c? Lmao

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@neonoah3353basically yes, the only funny thing about tcg not having maxx c are all the players eternally crying about coin toss formats that also are for maxx c staying banned and also want it banned in master duel. It's just really funny and I kind of want Konami to do what such people want.

    • @zakariaelhimer1325
      @zakariaelhimer1325 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​​@@admontblanc look at the tierlist in the ocg and master duel, all combo decks are at the top, maxxc doesnt keep shit in check Just makes the format more toxic and forces everyone to play 8 Cards to deal with the roach

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@zakariaelhimer1325 guess ygo players really can't read. Only idiots think the card is for keeping combo decks in check, I said it's to help you going second, which it does.

    • @zakariaelhimer1325
      @zakariaelhimer1325 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@admontblanc It doenst if you ever bother to read, the opponent can full combo and drop it on your ass going second, good luck breaking that board

  • @Squidtoken
    @Squidtoken 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    In 2024 ash is not overpowered, it's just good and ultra generic. Its like Dr. Doom in Marvel vs Capcom 3 or Landorus therion from Pokemon a few years back. Banning it at this point would do a lot more harm than good unless, as you mentioned, a massive number of other cards were also banned, probably a thousand or more. Since that kind of banlist will literally never happen, we kinda need to just accept what we have.

    • @mikaela5938
      @mikaela5938 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Dr Doom is one of the most overpowered characters in that game so it is comparable

    • @NY-Buddy
      @NY-Buddy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Fam, Hidden Missiles is a cancer to that game.
      Why should one button stop the entire flow of the game?
      You just cuz it's possible to dodge it doesn't mean that it should be there

    • @dhantefranklin336
      @dhantefranklin336 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ???????
      I played Pokémon vgc and UMvC3 back in the day, and let me tell you, those aren't the comparisons you'd give to advocate for Ash being fair. Far from it.

    • @NY-Buddy
      @NY-Buddy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And it's funny cuz I always make the comparison that this game used to be Street Fighter and now it's become Marvel where player 2 doesn't get to play

  • @smileyman1721
    @smileyman1721 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    *Laughs in casual gameplay* I think I speak for everyone that plays decks from before 2015 when I say I agree.
    I play Yugioh protagonist decks down to the most optimized list by an actual judge. And then I go to locals and spend the 45 minute wait time per game watching the other player take combos that empty out their extra deck and half their main deck onto the field, but unless you have numerous hand traps, the opponent will have a field with anywhere between 1 card that I can't touch or a full field that no matter what I use, there's ten negates for it.
    I've played against Kashtira burn decks three times! This game is not fun for returning or new players. I genuinely don't know how anyone can get into this game from scratch.

  • @DragoSmash
    @DragoSmash 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    hot take here
    Banning Ash would have been a good thing back then when SHE destroyed the meta, she and all the other handtraps like her
    Yugioh has scalated to this degree of powercreep because of handtraps, and now the power train has no brakes
    just as you mentioned, design space has been revolving around handtraps for quite some time, and things have been getting out of *hand* enough to make them a necessary evil
    back then i sighed and rolled my eyes when i heard about handtraps, now i cannot imagine the levels of absurdity the game would have without them
    the power in the game has escalated to a degree that it can't go back without some serious rules change and a considerable shift in the design direction of cards

    • @Rynjinivar
      @Rynjinivar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      That's not a hot take, just a wrong take. Combos were already accelerating to a ridiculous pace before Ash was released, and handtraps are an interactive way to slow those down.
      Remember that Ash released AFTER full power Spyral and Zoodiac, who I'll remind you are decks that are STILL POWERFUL.

    • @dhantefranklin336
      @dhantefranklin336 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I think when Komoney started to design archetypes that play around ash is when all hope for its ban was lost.

    • @geek593
      @geek593 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Rynjinivar Full powered Spyral didn't happen until a few sets after Ash released. But I agree with you in concept. Ash was created as a hand trap that could deal with escalating power on cards that weren't monsters on the field. Cards like Foolish Burial, Emergency Teleport, Card of Demise, Desires, and Grass jump to mind as potential design issues being considered when Ash was being designed. It seemed built to solve problems the then current suite of hand traps couldn't deal with. Even had they not ramped power creep up in the years after Ash would still probably be a perfectly healthy card.

    • @DragoSmash
      @DragoSmash 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Rynjinivar combos were accelerating at a ridiculous pace, and then making Ash gave a justification to keep making them, instead of trying to solve the problem that was already popping up
      just as Breadboy said, yes, there was a problem with combo decks like Zoodiac, but once Ash got released all design space revolved around her
      and now Konami is doing things to power creep even Ash, with Diabellstar bringing spells directly to the field, but its too late to go back now, because the minimum bar has been set very high

    • @VestedUTuber
      @VestedUTuber 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@DragoSmash
      You say that like they're not going to keep monetizing power creep _without_ Ash. That's the business model Konami runs this game on, they make broken shit and hit older cards to force people to buy the new stuff, they do fuck all about how broken the new stuff is, then they hit all the stuff they released and put out even more broken shit. That's been the name of the game ever since Critter Format.

  • @Rhino-n-Chips
    @Rhino-n-Chips 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm glad someone brought up that Ash does more than just stop a search. I auto-play 3 copies of this little shit because I've never had a game where it wasn't live at least ONCE. I genuinely want to know why they thought stopping the search wasn't enough, you could've put each effect on a separate card and they'd be played still.

  • @TheChipmania
    @TheChipmania 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ironically, the term generic cards like staples and boss monsters goes both ways. Not only are they good against almost everything, they are also super boring and exactly that, generic. Handtraps, generic boss monsters, and the speed are the main things that kill it for me. Having 4 handtraps and 1 starter should not be a thing whatsoever.
    For anyone who is sick of stale formats, I recommend Edison format. Trust me, it’s a lot more fun.
    P.S: I would just ban ash for all of the Branded Fusions not resolved. Just obnoxious. Interesting idea with errataing the card. I think it could work.

    • @shien-ryu4395
      @shien-ryu4395 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agree, 4 handtraps and 1 starter for FTK/OTK should not be a thing. I just want to say that yugioh have very few options for formats to play so playing Edison isn't the real solution, if your want to play a mid Deck that is 3-4 years old for example, your only option is the competitive 2024 tier zero format. The tcg needs more popular formats (or fix the game).

  • @traplover6357
    @traplover6357 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I dont know about "banned" but its very RARE to not play Ash since almost every deck has a Stratos. It was only in the Year of Fire format where people think about siding Ash to avoid being Hiita'd. If they do hit it in some way, it will be like a Upstart to 1 limitation Konami TCG did in 2016.

  • @yunonasumi7982
    @yunonasumi7982 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Maybe this is something the community should take the lead on instead of putting the pressure on Konami; turning it into some kind of experimental format. Create a custom format where the generic handtraps are banned, sparing maybe Droll (to keep things from getting too out of hand), Crow, and Veiler for targeted interaction.
    We all know that this will allow some decks to get completely out of hand, but that's the point. Allow these decks to bubble to the surface and figure out the best way to approach nerfing these decks, then let the next decks bubble up, repeating the process until the game has been slowed down sufficiently.
    Ash is too much of a filter card that Konami seems to have given their job of proactively keeping the game manageable. It's created the game state of either handtrapping your opponent into oblivion, drawing the out, or doing neither and just simply losing. This is a problem that needs to be solved, but there is no broad stroke way to easily solve it. It will take dedicated time and effort, something that the community has plenty of. Yugitubers would be very effective in this regard as they have large followings and can leverage that to try and affect change, hopefully for the better.

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People organize tournaments like that all the time, mostly via master duel. A format where all the top handtraps are banned would be interesting considering there are tons of handtraps that barely see any play (because who bothers with stuff like gnomaterial even if it's broken Vs one deck when ash is good against anything?).

  • @thekoboldintheattic8587
    @thekoboldintheattic8587 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Personally, I want decks to be pure archetype/engine, no bs hand traps, no barrone, just pure satisfying back and forth (I also want dinosaur beat down to be meta again)

  • @therobloxmonkey6704
    @therobloxmonkey6704 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    There may be a way to kill "Maxx C" without resorting to the banlist.
    Suggestion: Make Ritual, Fusion, Synchros, Xyz, Pendulum, LINK summoning classified as their own separate summoning methods
    Reasoning: This makes the chances people will "special summon" more rare, especially since nowadays decks are bound to "use the extra deck to help with their plays. Due to the rarity of special summoning (and I do believe the effect of '"Maxx C" lasts until the end of the turn), it would've been more of a gamble to pull of Maxx C, depending on the deck. Thus duelists will eventually have to play less copies of it since it wastes precious space in the deck.
    Considerations: By making the extra deck summoning methods (and rituals and pendulums) their own separate thing, it does however ruin some decks as they do rely on effects when "special summoned" even though they were not in accordance to my suggestion.
    Benefits: "Maxx C" wouldn't be very troubling in Master Duel and it wouldn't be troubling as well in the OCG, unless the people here LOVE "Maxx C"

    • @lanius1084
      @lanius1084 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this breaks so many other cards, maxx c isnt the only card that cares about special summons

    • @southafrica405
      @southafrica405 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like the idea, maybe add mana quark as part of special summoning where types of more difficult summoning like ritual are less costly, easier types like link are more costly and tax summoning across types if they are not part of your archetype
      I think this would slow down the game in general, perhaps have it as an experimental format

    • @dantemcedgelord9331
      @dantemcedgelord9331 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      better option would be, to just limit the times you are allowed to special summon each turn. like a max of 5-6 special summons max per turn! atleast this way, you wouldnt screw up 10000 other cards, like your retarded suggestion!

    • @therobloxmonkey6704
      @therobloxmonkey6704 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lanius1084 You'd be right, but at least "Maxx C" wouldn't be a huge problem

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@southafrica405limiting decks based on their archetype, or type and attribute is definitely a way to balance. There will always be a broken deck every format, but it does cool down the game a bit and narrows decks to rely more on their own stuff that was actually made for them to play.

  • @gabrielsalahi3656
    @gabrielsalahi3656 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Yes, it should be banned……..IF decks at this point weren’t designed around it
    If we ban ash then stopping decks from popping off would be so hard at this point
    Either it should have been banned a long time ago or we lower the power of decks universally
    EDIT: okay now that I actually watched the video lol. I have to say that I LOVE the errata idea

    • @four-en-tee
      @four-en-tee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Decks are designed around Maxx "C" too, that's not really much of an argument.

    • @gabrielsalahi3656
      @gabrielsalahi3656 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@four-en-tee But they aren’t tho-
      If decks were designed with Maxx-C in mind they would attempt to special summon 1-2 times maximum for full combo
      OR decks would have ways around MaxC
      Neither are true so-
      Okay there are rarely a few decks that only summon 1-2 monsters but the odd thing is that those decks are either bad, don’t see place where MaxC is legal, or they are so rare that using them as an example of “designed around MaxC” is a stretch

    • @dhantefranklin336
      @dhantefranklin336 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@four-en-teeFuck no they aren't. What game are you playing?

    • @randombadchannel8700
      @randombadchannel8700 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@gabrielsalahi3656 it's less, "archetypes are designed around max C" and more "we can make this huge wombo combo because max C keeps it in check".

    • @gabrielsalahi3656
      @gabrielsalahi3656 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@randombadchannel8700 again- that’s not true tho
      Whenever you look at any OCG tournament or MasterDuel what happens is you combo anyways regardless of MaxC. Any combo deck literally ever that’s good in the TCG is also good in the OCG and MasterDuel
      In what way shape or form does MaxC keep in check combo decks? It’s never once gatekept a deck. And whenever it’s played you combo through it anyways since you Auto-Lose if you don’t regardless of what deck you’re playing

  • @franckize
    @franckize 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    i pray you become more popular

    • @BreadBoyWeeb
      @BreadBoyWeeb  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Gotta put in that work, your support means the world. Also is your pfp Bandit Keinjaku? This is the hardest fucking PFP I’ve seen in my comments

  • @notthatthenamematters6163
    @notthatthenamematters6163 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It would be better if they banned her and focused more on handtraps for estabilished boards or protection, this single card makes an uncountable number of archetypes unplayable just because they need to resolve this one effect to do anything.

  • @L0calLEGEND
    @L0calLEGEND 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Can't wait for the eventual D Shifter video.

    • @gaaraofthefunk265
      @gaaraofthefunk265 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      As long as the gy is a second hand for powerful meta decks, shifter will be necessary.

    • @geek593
      @geek593 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@gaaraofthefunk265 As long as the GY is a second hand for most decks like it has been for most of the game's lifespan Shifter will remain a problem card.

  • @thephilosophyminor
    @thephilosophyminor 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It’s only like that because Konami wants it that way
    Most of the new archetypes are placing cards on the s/t zone specifically to play around ash
    The next era of power creep is going to be brutal and even ash won’t be able to deal with it

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are still effects in Snake Eyes that make you go neg 2 if hit by Ash Blossom. Power creep is there but Ash is still a good card in general.

    • @mfznal-hafidz8592
      @mfznal-hafidz8592 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh, yes. Electrumite places card from deck to extra deck, then add it from extra deck to the hand. Clever move, Konami.

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mfznal-hafidz8592 that's a good thing.

  • @thelaughingdragon32
    @thelaughingdragon32 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My three copies of secret rare gnome material are waiting

  • @shien-ryu4395
    @shien-ryu4395 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Ash does not serve a real purpose in the tcg anymore, except keeping in check low-mid tier decks. Elite tier decks cannot be stopped by a single ash blossom without using 2-3 other handtraps on top. So do we really need to keep in check non-top tier decks? Do we really need to force a handtrap heavy format for the tcg or there is another way to deal with the powercreep? Or maybe variety is bad for the game so we don't want elite decks to get occasionally outshined?

    • @geek593
      @geek593 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ash serves an extremely important purpose that other hand traps can match. It's a catch-all hand trap for dealing with advantage generating effects that aren't tied to monsters on field. It being a counter to Pots, E-Teles, and Foolish Burials gives all decks the ability to trade one for one with these cards which the other hand traps can't do unless it's weird like Nadir Servant and can be Belle'd. One for one trades are so much healthier than something like Droll which gives them their search but then ends the turn.

    • @shien-ryu4395
      @shien-ryu4395 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indeed, Ash is being a counter to Pots, E-tele, foolish burials and basically every card that touches the Deck, including all basics in-archetype searchs that 90% of the existed Decks desperately needs to work. I agree that the 1 for 1 aspect of Ash is at least a balanced one. Personally, I believe banning Ash is a bit to harsh, limiting it along with the Pots, E-teles, foolish burials and any other potentially problematic card is the way to go. Also, I would like to allow Decks that can search it to have it as a end board piece.

  • @creepygamercom
    @creepygamercom 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ash blossom has been on an all time low in terms of effectiveness. In a meta where Maxx C is banned and branded is going to be butchered by the next banlist, Ash serves no purpose besides the "Oh well I got 3 slots for a handtrap, might as well use ash." So I don't think it needs to be banned. Cards that need to be banned is stuff like shifter and droll.

  • @Blimbo4545
    @Blimbo4545 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    God the Zoo era was so awful

  • @redouanalami5115
    @redouanalami5115 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I think other handtraps should start seeing play. And that can only be done by hitting the one in the top.

    • @ecthelionv2
      @ecthelionv2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The irony is they aren't being played because they don't hit or interrupt the decks the way it needs to. Ash stops special summoning from the deck or tutors. Droll stops tutors hard, but at a slight downside of both players but does not stop setting from deck or special summoning from deck. Ghost Ogre pops a card during activation but doesn't negate it. Sure you might stop someone from synchro or link or XYZ plays with it but it doesn't always interrupt if say, that card has some "When X is destroyed" clause or "You can do this from the graveyard clause." Veiler stops an effect on the field but only for monsters. If their combo piece starts from the hand, veiler is useless but it's fine to stop saying Baronne or Apollusa from disrupting your plays. Battle traps aren't relevant in a best of three but might be Ok In stall strategies in MD which is best of one. Gorz hasn't been relevant with negates running around and with OTK strategies that sometimes makes a 10k monster.
      So unless there's a replacement that can be on par with the likes of the ones that are used. Or the game changes so much that it's slowed down considerably. It's unlikely that the most used handtraps will be banned.

    • @redouanalami5115
      @redouanalami5115 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100%. I think the default number of handtraps you'll want to run in your decklist shouldn't be changing. It only depends on the meta at this point. They can't steal games by themself. But instead are a way to keep you in safe position. I did play more than edison so i do know there are tons of other ones than fits that role and not reliant on your battle phase.

    • @John-ii6he
      @John-ii6he 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@redouanalami5115 "Please run 20 of the same cards in your main deck, and at least 5 of the same cards of your extra deck and ruin creativity!" is all you coulda said tbh.

    • @redouanalami5115
      @redouanalami5115 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@John-ii6he yea so the same number.

    • @redouanalami5115
      @redouanalami5115 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@John-ii6he i didn't make the game btw.

  • @neonoah3353
    @neonoah3353 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    To answer the title, no, but it should be limited.

  • @mercurydjinn3366
    @mercurydjinn3366 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What I appreciate about this channel is how you ignore the current problem of the week is and instead focus on the overarching issues and how we can improve the game overall instead of just putting a bandage over something that is going to be irrelevant when the next set releases. Ash Blossom is a card that I have taken issue with for years now. This is going to be a hot take but Ash deserves to go. It negates three different types of effects that are all common. It is also impossible to dodge the negation as it does not target. Ash is too versatile and difficult to interact with. Compare it to Veiler for example. Veiler only works on monsters that are on the field and it has to target the monster that you want to negate which opens the possibility of counterplay. Ash has no such downside.

  • @AlleyCatUwU
    @AlleyCatUwU 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I hadn't considered that Ash was something of a floodgate. To that end, I do think it's lazy of Konami to design OCG archetypes around Maxx C as if it were a skill.
    I think something like 5D's speed duels would be ideal; the card games on motorcycles version. It's kind of a misnomer; really, it slows the duel down.

  • @noctra4455
    @noctra4455 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Limit all hand traps to 1, that'd be interesting

  • @MistAssassin69
    @MistAssassin69 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    MD is weird. I'd be quite disappointed if they outright ban the roach without ever having tried to nerf it. Would be a good time for them to remember it's a digital game.

    • @Heyhowsitgoin999
      @Heyhowsitgoin999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It really just needs 5 words printed on it: "While you control no cards"

    • @southafrica405
      @southafrica405 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Heyhowsitgoin999but it would still be abusable by decks that can have 15+ handtraps like snake eye or tempai. The lower ceiling decks going first would still loose

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Heyhowsitgoin999actual shit way of errataing the roach instead of giving it d shifter's clause that you need an empty gy

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@southafrica405those decks can already play that many handtraps regardless and you lose against them regardless of them having the roach or not. People really need to look at stats with more attention, which is a good thing master duel gave us. It's an observable fact that the roach benefits the player going second more than it does the player going first. The win rate increase is not huge, but that's because there are currently too many cards that stop the roach and it's precisely those decks who benefit from that. The tcg without the roach became a sad thing where the first player to combo after playing through all the handtraps wins. It's just everyone throwing handtraps at each other until the other player is left without plays, whoever draws the best engine card then pops off. And post siding the guy going first slaps in 6 floodgates and you're left with 2-4 cards in hand, if you opened handtraps, and have to contend with summon limit or anti spell, very fun and interactive.

    • @SlaytonSlaytonSlayton
      @SlaytonSlaytonSlayton 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Roach needs an errata that your opponent takes no damage till the end of the next turn to making passing when you get maxx c'ed a realistic option. Currently your choices are "play the game and get OTKed because they drew too m uch" or "pass turn so they don't draw too much and get OTKed". Maxx C is essentially "discard this card, OTK your opponent" if they don't have ash blossom. It's the worst fucking design lol

  • @NinguiohTCG
    @NinguiohTCG 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Average branded player

  • @JoyKiller21
    @JoyKiller21 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I believe that there are a LOT of decks that would flourish with the absence of that feet fuck. Hits to cetain decks must be made of course, but thats a risk im willing to take if it means that i will face iff against more decks

  • @MercuryA2000
    @MercuryA2000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Something that I think would be nice is if hand traps were a part of your specific deck. I really love that different decks do completely different things, and I would like it if hand traps fed into that. So, instead of generic Ash Blossom, adamancipator gets a way to manipulate what card they can search, while kashtira makes them banish it face down instead.
    If hand traps became deck exclusive, I can imagine some crazy stuff coming out too. Like, a zombie deck that has a card similar to maxx c except it mills instead. Or charmers getting a hand trap that lets them set and flip a monster.
    Heck, if they figured out how to word it, they could even make an archetype who's entire gimmick was going second, who was able to bypass the limitations of other archetype's handtraps.
    If decks started having stuff they did that was unique going second, it might not feel as boring and lame to do so, and the power of your hand traps would genuinely be a boon. Yugioh's kinda gotten to a point where archetypes are the center of deckbuilding, so they should just lean into it.

  • @blueqion9488
    @blueqion9488 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I really don't think Ash Blossom is a problem card. Sure you can use it against pretty much every deck and it will always do something but nearly no good deck loses to 1 Ash Blossom.
    In the tcg Ash Blossom sometimes also falls out of the meta depending on what the best deck is (for example in the Tearlament tier 0 meta).
    (I am pretty sure you don't really have to play Ash in the current tcg meta as well.)
    The main reason why Ash is at a near 100% playrate in Master Duel is that it counters Maxx "C" the actual best card that is legal in any format.
    I know this video is about the tcg and yeah even in the tcg Ash sees a lot of play because of how versatile Ash is but that is the main reason why its played it always does _something_ but on its own 1 Ash Blossom doesn't actually stop a Snake-Eyes or a Fire King or a Kashtira or a Plant Link or a Dragon Link deck.
    Ash is nice it always does something and combined with other handtraps it can stop a good deck from doing what it wants to do but not on its own.
    I don't mind banning Ash simply because it is played so much since such a long time but we shouldn't pretend like its an actual problem card imo

    • @NY-Buddy
      @NY-Buddy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The first quote that you said is the problem.
      If a deck is determined to be good by How well it plays around Ash blossom is a problem. Cuz something else is determining how good it is.
      Example, magical musketeers is a great deck. But most of the time you have to start with Casper or Starfire to start playing right? One Ash turns that whole thing off. Whereas that deck has a functionality to compete against every deck because it has tools to deal with everydeck. But it can't even start playing because there's three Ash in the game In every deck

  • @sacredcosmicsun8217
    @sacredcosmicsun8217 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If Konami wants to help against trap decks like lab and they limit ash in some way they should bring red reboot back to at least 1

  • @neos5432
    @neos5432 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Aint no way bro is coming at ash when imperm is just as guilty and these handtraps are the only play you have going second against basically every deck

    • @jacktophono1
      @jacktophono1 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Simple, limit negates and ban maxx c in the ocg.

    • @neos5432
      @neos5432 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@jacktophono1 nah i think there should be a speacial summon limit. going through half your deck in 1 turn is not how yugioh was designed to be played.

    • @jacktophono1
      @jacktophono1 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@neos5432 oooooh maybe like 5-10

  • @ZidaneTribal1989
    @ZidaneTribal1989 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What needs to be banned are the consistent Omni-Negate cards. Konami needs to stop making powerful cards splashable for every deck.

  • @m7md_mns923
    @m7md_mns923 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    yes it should...at this point it feels like a solemn judgment from the hand ngl

    • @seldomn06
      @seldomn06 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ...Solemn judgement is an omni-negate.

    • @m7md_mns923
      @m7md_mns923 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@seldomn06 yeah...i said (feels)...searching is a key thing that every deck does...so negating that feels like an omni-negate

  • @cinderefell1399
    @cinderefell1399 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I feel like these questions are just a circular conversation. Bann that card and a combo can actually finish, ban that card and the combo can't be used, and so on. I watched the vid for the KHs music.

  • @Synactive
    @Synactive 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    one thing I always find annoying about the idea of nerfing hand traps to be useable only when you don’t control cards (ive heard this idea for maxx “c” where people want it only useable if you control no monsters) is the idea of you getting handtrapped at a weak point in your combo then your opponent having a turn but whatever you had isn’t live now, this ash errata is better than alot of these ideas cause if your opponent does stop your turn you aren’t necessarily dead in the water if all you have is an ash

  • @Voicegoblin
    @Voicegoblin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    At best limited to 1 or banned outright at worst

  • @Golden-Monarch-One
    @Golden-Monarch-One 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Banned no? Semi’d or limited to decrease opening with Ash in hand. Maybe only if Maxx C stays banned/limited to 1, Called By the Grave gets bumped to 2.

  • @AllBeganwithBBS
    @AllBeganwithBBS 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    God how can one man have so many BASED takes in this short span of time?

  • @mikaela5938
    @mikaela5938 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i kind of wish konami had promoted speed duel format more bc it's the first time we've actually had a format other than standard and it was a really fun and different version of the game and they actually made perfectly ultimate great moth playable

  • @Sombres
    @Sombres 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i wish the walking negates were slowed down, too, but, focusing on ash itself... it's just so frustrating, as are the other handtraps they made later, like infinite impermanence.
    I do wonder about a format with less handtraps that relies more on board breakers such as kaijus, there can be only one, forbidden droplet, etc. If one at least gets to go off and build a board before it gets broken, maybe it would be less frustrating than getting handtrapped. The thing is, people would probably rely more on cards like solemn judgment to counter those, and duels would probably take longer as well. Time on rounds is quite a problem as well. It's tough.

  • @mfznal-hafidz8592
    @mfznal-hafidz8592 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think limit would work. Because most players often bring 3 so they need to replace 2 copies with other handtrap or techs. Ash power level is sure really different from other handtrap such as droll, ghost belle even shifter. Even if playing against non-combo deck, she just works. Because every archetype at least has 1 card that helps to draw, add something, dump something or special summon straight from deck. The other handtrap just slow or situational. Shifter needs you to have 0 monster in GY, Droll is slow and has drawback to you, Ghost Belle mostly to counter zombie archetype, Veiler targets and can only be used during opp. Main phase, D.D. Crow has similar issue with ghost belle, Skull Meister is budget Ghost Belle, Ghost mourner is too specific despite bonus burn damage, Chaos Hunter is format dependant and costly, Psy-framegear handtraps are too costful and need you to control no monster. Pankratops and Ghost Ogre are decent but still far from Ash.

  • @PhukPKummings
    @PhukPKummings 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Literally the only card that stops me as i run the synchro, jet synchron deck. But, apparently using adventure token cards gets around it, havent tried it yet but it apparently works.

  • @zenaki8088
    @zenaki8088 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ye I think he is one of us boys our bro is spreading holy branded words. We must protect him at all cost.

  • @steeveedragoon
    @steeveedragoon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's hard to say, but I will say this. I think ash's usage mostly comes down to believing that it's that good.
    The card undoubtedly has it's moments, but it's not always that terribly good. Obviously right now it's mid at best, detrimental at worst because if snake-eye, but even aside from that, there's very few situations where it's impactful enough to stop a deck.
    It can stop branded, and it can hurt Labrynth, but outside of that I can't think of many other decks that were absolutely ruined by it.
    Talking about one of it's worst formats, PHHY format.
    You could ash wraitsoth, but it doesn't matter because they already have a Kash in hand. You could ash unicorn to potentially stop them from getting to birth or theosis, you could ash theosis itself, but they may be able to extend anyways because you decided to save your ash for theosis and they now have Birth.
    Let's not forget how ashing unicorn or theosis also usually meant losing a card in your extra deck.
    And lastly, lets not forget about about Talents. Thanks for the draw 2/confiscation.

  • @bakabunny788
    @bakabunny788 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is a continuous spell card called 'Prohibition', all it does is have you say the name of one card, and it cannot be used for the rest of the duel, as long as it is on board. It has potential to slow down the game, but would need to be protected as any effect that can, will remove it from the board and make the card you chose playable again, at least in Yu-Gi-Oh GX Spirit Caller, I'm not sure about actual tournaments. The best part is that it's at three and is searchable by generic spell searchers so you can just ban three problem cards of your choosing.

    • @BreadBoyWeeb
      @BreadBoyWeeb  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      prohibition is useless going second, its just eh going first. Why would I side it going first when you can side a floodgate like summon limit and instantly win no matter what

    • @bakabunny788
      @bakabunny788 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BreadBoyWeeb yeah, but it can still slow down a game, which is what we need, or they could limit a lot of cards.

  • @uberdueler2990
    @uberdueler2990 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    8000 lifepoints isn't enough to keep a player safe for even a turn. Konami should raise the base lifepoint total to 10,000. It's a small increase compared to what decks are capable of, but it just might be enough of a cushion to allow players to turn duels around.
    They could even go extreme and make it 15,000 lifepoints.

  • @Honest_Mids_Masher
    @Honest_Mids_Masher 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don't really have any strong opinions on Ash tbh. To me it's just another handtrap thats a 1-1 interaction. With that being said I do think it being able to cover a wide variety of effects while some may find annoying I do sort of like it for how it helps with deckspace.
    If you split Ash's effect negation between three cards that just means there's more cards you need to buy (I shudder at the thought of the prices they would have in the TCG) and in the case of a huge variety in the meta you may have to run all three and then other handtraps on top of that which just makes deckspace more restrictive.
    The errata I do like tbh for the TCG specifically and honestly any way to make turn 1 combo negate boards less oppressive even by a small amount is a good thing.

    • @BreadBoyWeeb
      @BreadBoyWeeb  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      One day I’m gonna make a whole manifesto for how to balance going second in Yugioh

    • @Honest_Mids_Masher
      @Honest_Mids_Masher 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BreadBoyWeeb I honestly think rule changes/additions are the way to go and then adding a banlist after a couple of months post said rule changes for further balancing.

    • @Numbers_Game
      @Numbers_Game 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well of course, this dumbass doesn't really take card market into consideration when he is going off with his takes. Same with his video about generic monster cards. Why have generic monsters that are a one and done when you can make a dozen of them which means you have to spend either 360 UR materials or hundreds of dollars to buy physical cards.
      All 3 of his videos are anti consumer in nature. Banning Maxx C outright removes 9 staples in Master Duel wich means 9 different UR cards that will have to replace the gap which will vary deck by deck. Banning generic extra deck monsters does the same. At no point does he ever consider if this will make the game more affordable. At best he might make a video along the lines "Konami shouldn't be greedy" when generic cards are the best way to keep track of demands. It's easier to reprint 100 most played cards compared to whatever vision this guy has.

  • @rasendestroyer2701
    @rasendestroyer2701 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In a non-rotating game power creep is inevitable
    that's why I think there's 2 and only 2 ways to fix Yugioh
    either
    1) a hilariously large banlist
    or
    2) a complete overhaul / new game
    If my understanding of the game is right, then during Yugis-Era they realized that Archetypes are a good thing
    but during Fusion-Era they realized that having an overpowered archetype made players simply not play weaker archetypes
    so because everyone was playing the same archetype they backpaddled and made more generic bosses, the Synchro Monsters to allow more variety
    then, during Synchro Era they realized, that people loved the less archtype bound generic approach because it added a lot of versatility to deckbuilding and made their decks feel more personal
    (tho decks where still archetype based, just less strict)
    and then they overdid it
    During the Xyz-Era generic bosses started growing way too powerful
    now easily accessible generic bosses often if not always where more powerful then hard to access archetype bosses
    the game quickly lost all balance
    and a solution was needed
    they couldn't tune generic bosses down as the mistakes where already made and the number monsters where the whole gimmik of this era
    so instead of treating the sickness,
    they started treating the symptoms
    Hand traps and flood gates started spawning left and right
    While they did good in treating the symptoms, they actually brought more harm than good as the sickness still grew and it rapidly did so
    hand traps and flood gates enabled power creep to go crazy
    Pendulum Era came and was so very very over powered that it literally killed all the old cards
    they lost players left and right because all their decks got nuked by pendulum
    so they had to drastically nerf it
    Link-Era started
    a new mechanic of monsters creating extra zones, designed solely to handle the pendulum problem
    and then it escalated again, as this mechanic was just as broken
    generic bosses spawned everywhere
    more and more hand traps, flood gates and generic bosses where created to deal with the already existing generic hand traps, flood gates and generic bosses
    and slowly but surely this two player game deteriorated into a single player game where a turn takes 20 minutes, summons one half of the deck and draws the other half while completely locking the opponent from playing turn 1
    players started only playing half a deck for the other half was reserved solely for generic hand traps and flood gates and all end boards started looking the same
    the amalgamization of meta decks started getting so bad that "archetype decks" often only played only one singular if maybe two to three archetype cards and the rest of the 40 card deck was just the same in every single deck list
    Now we just go from tier-0 format to tier-0 format
    And my question is,
    what's the point of playing a non-rotating card game if every three months a new tier-0 deck spawns and forces you to trash your old deck and buy the new one?
    You could play a rotating game and literally have the same
    That's why I think there's only the 2 mentioned solutions
    Either all generic overpowered cards get banned, wich would result in a hilariously large banlist with thousands of cards
    Or they restart the game
    A complete overhaul
    A new more balanced game with clear rules and clear effect-phrasing from the start
    that has a way bigger focus on balance than before, heavily restricting boss monsters to their archetypes
    similair to rush duel

  • @deviltrigger02
    @deviltrigger02 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    banning ash and maxx C don't solve root problem of yugioh.
    Yugioh needs a clear cut direction on how the feeling should be when playing the game. Combo oriented and fast pace? or just slow pace yet many turns? Only then, the solution can be pin pointed.
    Assuming the game state has to be slow down, Banning ash and maxx C only make things worse, as the real problem lies on "why player choose to auto include those cards" rather than "how those cards ruin every single game." If you want to slow down a game, you need more cards that can actually effectively limit the ability to special summon or searching and consistently used in on turn 1, in the same time T1 player has a consistent chance to survive T2 OTK.
    If you want a face pace, you might need to make every deck like full power ishizu tearlament, where who goes first don't really matter as everyone has a chance to play against you during your first turn. This way, banning maxx C and ash become essential as the hand trap can potentially instant wins you any game the moment it thrown, or lose because your opponent succeed maxx C challange.
    either way, yugioh needs a big overhaul in order to solve "T1 big boards turn 2 decide winners" kind of game. However, in the perspective of konami, this also means taking risk to lost existing player as people don't like huge overhaul change where all of those older cards become totally no value. It damages the profit of konami long run. A good example is how they implement huge changes in link era where you need link monster to use extra deck cards, also later they update again revert some of the bad changes before. Both causes a wave of player just gone like that. The similar phenomeneon can be observe in cardfight vanguard as well, which is more radical.

  • @Voltra_
    @Voltra_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The only reason the newest card are as strong as they are is because we have cards like Ash. The current state of the game is the fault of one goddamn card.

  • @kaison12205
    @kaison12205 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I see you saw the mbt video where he mentioned ash should be banned

  • @duckgossip
    @duckgossip 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Branded propaganda 🗣

  • @angelagonzalez8250
    @angelagonzalez8250 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One thing I would like to see if for the to put a hard limit on the amount of time you can summon per turn. Make it 10. Most decks can make a decent board within 10 summons. It will slow the game down. Also long turns will become a thing of the past.

    • @BreadBoyWeeb
      @BreadBoyWeeb  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This would kill like 100 decks these days

  • @metinkartop2898
    @metinkartop2898 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Actually, hand traps and board breakers belong to the same group, and I prefer calling it Turn 2 Protection.
    They introduced the rule not to draw during the first turn in 2014 to keep going first in check. It didn't suffice. After Ash Blossom, we also had Nibiru and Dark Ruler No More in 2019. The result? Going first continued to give a huge advantage for the entirety of 2020.
    Because there is no ceiling on special summoning, spell activations, etc.; this is very difficult to win in this game after losing the die roll. Engine cards are mostly useless against an established board. Only Turn 2 Protection cards keep going first in check.

  • @terminateallsjws8318
    @terminateallsjws8318 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hell no Ash is a completely fair card compared to other hand traps i.e. Maxx c

  • @NekoNekonoTabiTabi
    @NekoNekonoTabiTabi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what id we make quick play spells playable during opponent turn like first season Yu-Gi-Oh sounds really busted but at least it negates the likelihood of not having an interaction during opponent turn

  • @TheArmyofHades
    @TheArmyofHades 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let alone should, we must consider the could. Without ash blossom everything is running rampart the game has no breaks everything is crazy.

  • @wolfwoodstyleblue3946
    @wolfwoodstyleblue3946 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You just gotta know they gonna design a handtrap to counter the seting from deck, and it will be expensive

  • @hasanplaster1510
    @hasanplaster1510 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    banning ash or not is rather a qustion of is handtrap a design yu gi oh should take or not (and thats an idea for another video)

  • @VestedUTuber
    @VestedUTuber 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Guy who's salty about Maxx "C" is also salty about Ash Blossom, who woulda thunk? Let me guess... got your "break my board" combo deck shut down by a single card one too many times, right?
    Seriously, though, cards like Maxx "C" and Ash Blossom exist to try and keep the game at least somewhat in check. Maxx "C" by making your opponent have to choose between doing their full combo and giving you huge amounts of card advantage (and also risk getting hit by more disruption), or settling for a less developed board state to deny that advantage, and Ash Blossom by basically preventing your opponent from completing their combo.
    I've got two thoughts on this:
    1. Keep Ash Blossom and thus any remote sense of balance the game might still have
    OR
    2. Ban Ash Blossom and see how deep the rabbit hole goes, and how much more bullshit the community is willing to take before giving Konami the collective middle finger and ditching this unbalanced game.
    Here's the thing - Konami isn't going to slow the game down REGARDLESS of whether Ash Blossom is banned or not. Ash Blossom is a symptom, not the cause, same with Maxx "C". The cause is Konami monetizing power creep and INTENTIONALLY making more and more powerful cards SPECIFICALLY with the intent of forcing sales.

    • @shien-ryu4395
      @shien-ryu4395 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Talking for the Tcg, Maxx "c" is already banned for years and most of the people agree it is by far the best Standard Yugioh format we have for this exact reason. Ash blossom does not preventing your opponent from completing their combo, except if you are ashing low tier decks. I agree the existance of Ash blossom and the consolidation of Maxx "c" is a symptom of a poorly managed game, not the cause, along with some other handtraps and generic overpowered Extra Deck monsters. Powecreep is a bad business model for a 25 years old game and should not be excused.

  • @theazuredemon4854
    @theazuredemon4854 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Banning Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring(along with many monster hand traps) and then errata it to where you also need to discard a monster of the same type/attribute as the handtrap you are trying to play can help balance a lot of cards better, while also locking you into summoning monster of that 1 type or attribute until the end of your next turn, forcing players into playing mono type/attribute decks if they REALLY want to play those handtraps, and you would also need to dedicate so many resources just to play 1 card that may or may not have synergies with the deck that you're are trying to play.
    And yes you could also apply this to Maxx "C" and Earth Insect decks would see more competitive play. Though people who ENTIRELY LOATHES Weevil Underwood as a character would have mixed feelings on that...
    And imagine having to send Light attribute monsters to graveyard just to activate Effect Veiler, Honest, Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit, and Nibiru. Light Decks would end up seeing more competitive play as a result. Yes, even Blue-Eyes and Galaxy-Eyes... though they would still brick like crazy though...
    Zombie Toolbox control would see even more competitive play with Ash Blossom/Ghost Belle needing at either a monster of the same attribute as them, or another Zombie type monster to even play them, and Zombie decks typically don't care if they mostly have recursion of some kind.
    Trap cards with graveyard effects would see more play if Infinite Impermanence required you to send another trap from to grave, though that may end up requiring re-balancing trap cards with graveyard effects as a result, and on a case by case basis.

    • @gijane2cantwaittoseeyou203
      @gijane2cantwaittoseeyou203 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ''Yes, even Blue-Eyes and Galaxy-Eyes... though they would still brick like crazy though...'' They should just remove tribute summon like in Duel Links.

    • @Koalogy
      @Koalogy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In a card game with no mulligans and 5 card opening hands, trading 2 for 1 just to stop a single effect or card activation would be brutally bad and probably unplayable unless it consistently prevents you from losing the game. Discard for cost would be better suited for the turn ending handtraps like Droll/Shifter or to a lesser extent Nibiru.
      I think a better solution is you have to reveal another card in your hand that shares a card type/attribute etc. with either the hand trap itself or with the card you are trying to negate. Then you still get the deckbuilding restriction without making the cards unplayable.

  • @Vaniity_Velvet
    @Vaniity_Velvet 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm more annoyed by the fact that after 25 years Konami *STILL* refers to all Undead as "Zombies".

  • @noratempest7115
    @noratempest7115 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was gonna say that a cheap I wouldn't want to get rid of a cheap and non offensive staple until I realized I was calling a 4-5$ piece of card board cheap.... Great vid always chief

  • @anindabaneree4819
    @anindabaneree4819 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If hand traps get banned going second is as good as forfeit

    • @arrownoir
      @arrownoir 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It kinda already is on Masterduel.

    • @MoskalMedia
      @MoskalMedia 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We are already at that point. We've been at that point for a while now.

    • @anindabaneree4819
      @anindabaneree4819 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some are limited I think rest unbanned in master duel. I am new to this correct me if I am wrong

    • @admontblanc
      @admontblanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@arrownoirlol, no it's not and a big part of it is that master duel actually has maxx c at 3.

  • @Sugarbombsdestroyer
    @Sugarbombsdestroyer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think instead of banning a bunch of cards a better option would be to make a summon limit to the game… like normally you could only normal summon one monster and in the beginning you could special summon any many monsters as you wanted cause there wasn’t that many ways you could fill the broad but there wasn’t much purpose to that unless you were attacking to take out your opponent, no real boss monsters that have built in negates .
    So if the rules were changed to allow one or two normal summons but only three to five special summons , it would allow you to pull out your combo cards and set up just one boss monster and would stop these 30ty minute turns.

    • @Sugarbombsdestroyer
      @Sugarbombsdestroyer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve been playing since the beginning, and the rules have already changed before besides new types of monsters that need new rules , there was no limit to how many cards you could put in your deck and at one point you could have 30ty side deck monsters. Imagine having 30ty side deck limit now the game would be nuts lol so sometimes the rules need to change with the power creep.

  • @steamworkfox4564
    @steamworkfox4564 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think Ash should stay, otherwise you have Zero counter to decks that can manage infinite draw strats, FTK, or even one card combos that'll create impossible board breakers.
    With Called by, even if ash was gone it would still be useful since most decks send cards to the grave for one reason or another.

  • @idalwave
    @idalwave 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:00 While it is true that Ash is a cause of cards setting from Deck, I think it opens an awesome design space. Imagine decks that could interact with the Set card on the open window before it activates? Like, cool, a Rota that beats Ash but loses to MST, that’s pretty neat imo. I think that this exploration of how cards can be tutored is awesome for the game.

    • @Sp3llmen
      @Sp3llmen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that "cool" interation of losing to mst relies on you going first BEFORE they set the card. If the person setting a card and not searching it is going first, that means its unstoppable because no handtrap can beat it. Then if that same person has ash along with a big board, you lose almost automatically unless you play stun

    • @idalwave
      @idalwave 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sp3llmen That’s very true, but if we’re looking at design space and how Diabellstar circumvents Ash, it wouldnt be a stretch to hope for a future handtrap like card that could pop cards at Infinite Impermanence timing. Like Typhoon, but maybe more applications, like how Ash has multiple triggers.
      Very theoretical on my part, but if we’re talking about design, I think cards like this would be a logical step! MST would most certainly be too slow, but this one wouldnt. I used MST as a catch all “pop a backrow” term; i didnt mean like the actual quick play spell, sorry!

  • @chrismiller3548
    @chrismiller3548 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honestly just change the quick effect property of hand traps to only be able to be used on the opponents turn. That way your opponent cant handtrap you after theyve set up their board

  • @KalebDaubMooshra
    @KalebDaubMooshra 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Errata youve presented is legit a perfect idea and is rather well thought out.
    But ofcourse ash in the tcg feels better, but evem if the errata were ro hit rhe tcg i wouldnt be mad

  • @cameraredeye3115
    @cameraredeye3115 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ash Blossom is the definition of "necessary evil" in Yu-Gi-Oh. There's no getting around it. You either play it and/or a similar card that slows your opponent's combo roll, or you just lose.
    Banning this card is absolutely the wrong move to make. If anything, you could errata Ash to where she can negate anything that would make a card leave the Main Deck in any way on resolution, including being placed in the S/T zone, and she'd still be fine at 3.

  • @philipbushby9462
    @philipbushby9462 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seeing This Video About a 7 Seven Years Old Card, Seven Days After it got Upload

  • @torakandwolf6786
    @torakandwolf6786 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Experiment; ban all generic extra deck monsters and limit all major hand traps. Maxx C and Shifter are banned, just no.

    • @Honest_Mids_Masher
      @Honest_Mids_Masher 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Damn guess meta became more meta

  • @OurDarkGoldenHero
    @OurDarkGoldenHero 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This might be a hard idea to implement, or just too much work on Konami's part, but I think banning Ash would allow for archetypes to have more built-in handtraps that are healthier for the game. In general, I think we need to move just a little bit away from "negate! negate! negate!!!!" and more in the direction of other mechanics/gimmicks in Yugioh like dodging effects. There's no turning the clock on handtraps - the speed of the game just wouldn't allow it. So just make playing on your opponent's turn the norm.

  • @michaellevin2861
    @michaellevin2861 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    You raise a good point, Ash as a card keeps a LOT of things in check, for better or for worse. And banning her would just lead to a domino effect no one wants to deal with. And an errata would be a clusterfuck.
    With that said, I don't think Ash at three is the right thing either. I think she needs a permanent spot on the limited list. Everyone's already running at least one copy (but probably all three), so keep it that way to add room for 2 extra tech cards. Extra backrow removal you couldn't have normally? Nibiru if you decided handtraps over him because your locals aren't summoning a lot? Consistency for your engine of choice? It makes using her more impactful on BOTH players. Never knowing if your opponent has it ready or not, and what other cards they can have in hand. And you have to think more on what card you want to hit with Ash, versus using something else you may have to block or negate.
    Ban or no ban on Ash isn't the discussion, I think. My stance is putting Ash to 1 to then allow other cards to see use.

    • @therobloxmonkey6704
      @therobloxmonkey6704 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was thinking the same thing. "Ash..." has become an icon for the game and has kept some decks in check. So putting it in "limited" or "semi-limited" status can make her feel more situational yet helpful to keep those decks in check.

    • @0_MikankoChan
      @0_MikankoChan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But limiting her would make her even more frustrating Like MAXX c was Back then tbh konami wont Bann Ash they will keep Design around her and ppl will keep playing 24 handtraps cause there are cards Like shifter and stuff + there 3 imperms veilers and Like 5 other handtraps that negates monters

  • @Lazzle-Dazzle
    @Lazzle-Dazzle 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm all for the banning of Ash Blossom until they make fusion summoning inherent like Synchro, XYZ, Pendulum, and Links.
    Fusions have to rely 90% on a card resolving vs. rely on summoning the necessary fusion materials onto the field to inherently summon fusion monsters via tribute like the other ED mechanics.
    In other words, Konami should allow inherent tributes for fusion summons so that we are able to special summon fusion monsters without need of spells/effects or just treat the fusion spell/effect as an inherent summon to which Handtraps and Omni-negates can't stop like the other ED mechanics.

  • @miep3934
    @miep3934 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really fucking hate that generic handtraps work for the going first player. Like, as if going first wasn't already enough of an advantage, now you can also weaponize your defensive cards on turn two in addition to the 15 interruptions you set up.
    It's why I don't buy the "Maxx C helps turn 2 players" argument because it also helps turn 1 players.
    Actually, I've been thinking about how to errata Maxx C to make it fair. And I think I came up with a solution. Step 1. Make it function like Droll. As in, you can chain it to a SS but only get a draw after that SS. And Step 2. Make the draw happen in the end phase. That way it really only benefits you for comebacks.
    In general we need to nerf cards for going first. Maybe we should design every handtrap like Imperm.

  • @VrginityTheft
    @VrginityTheft 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the errata idea isnt too bad but instead going forwards they should print cards and boss monsters from individual archetypes to specify that "you cannot activate cards in the hand the turn this card is on the field, after it has been summoned" so we can see a towers endboard that feels really good to play into without it being a brick shitstick thats untargetable by even the FBI and less affected by cards that dont weight more than a handgun, all because they summoned the guy, set 3 and passed while still having 3-5 in hand that you just have to guess and hope arent all supplemental disruption via hand traps.

    • @VrginityTheft
      @VrginityTheft 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its all unfair to ash to blame this card for the games natural powerscaling but i think itd be less egregious to some if we simply got more searchable omninegate handtraps that operated in the same vain as mercourier in branded (being searchable and only online while certain in archetype fusions were on board)

    • @VrginityTheft
      @VrginityTheft 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      also im gonna be deadass despite some things being too powerful and generic i think some stuff isnt powerful and generic enough because after paying for 8 x3 ultras that cost me 2 whole paychecks my vanquish soul core shouldve had panthera giving me neck every night and an in archetype searchable tutor with a real name instead of what is technically external support with stake your soul.
      how do you print an on release tier 2 at best deck as 7 FUCKING ULTRAS AND THEN WAIT TO GIVE US ANOTHER SEARCHER

  • @Keurgui1
    @Keurgui1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The most fun I've had with this game was when Ash was at 2

  • @vincentd.gaspard4725
    @vincentd.gaspard4725 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Ash is a icon of yugioh just appreciate it how old the card is and how many people use it in this meta of the game.

    • @shien-ryu4395
      @shien-ryu4395 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      An icon of modern degeneracy

    • @AmazonessKing01
      @AmazonessKing01 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You can say the same thing about Raigeki or even Pot of Greed. That usually doesn't mean it is a good card.

  • @singleplayermoments
    @singleplayermoments 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I only (attempt to) play competitively on Master Duel, and on there I’ve found Ash Blossom isn’t that big of a threat. Whenever I play it, my opponent almost always has a bunch of other plays they can do and is still able to end on a crazy end board. Having one or two negates barely makes a dent in most deck’s combos, at least from what I’ve seen. So I think it’s fine to stay.

  • @NOTMASTERPRIME
    @NOTMASTERPRIME 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Honestly if Konami not just limit cards but out banned the problematic cards I would enjoy the game. However that would be silly because there will always be a problematic card in yu gi oh no matter is old or new. Although ash has been in the meta untouched for along time I don't agree with a banned but a limit should be fair. Handtraps need to be balanced.(And yes I know that's impossible because Yu-Gi-Oh loves it's power creep but it can also lead games to it's downfall)

  • @MajinVegito100
    @MajinVegito100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ash was the boogeyman of yugioh like 5 years ago. Since then Konami has started to make decks that get cards out of the deck by simply setting them or placing them in the spell trap zone. She’s going to be less impactful as time goes on because of course Konami knows how to make cards to play around others they have made.
    Banning ash on the wishlist of every rouge player who’s deck is entirely reliant on one choke point play. It sucks sure but these hand traps are currently the only thing keeping really high powered tier 2 and above decks in check.
    Like should it have ever come to this? Maybe not but that’s just where it’s at rn.

  • @gr8dmoore17
    @gr8dmoore17 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ive always said it needs to be limited not banned

  • @abdinurabdulrahman1759
    @abdinurabdulrahman1759 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Droll is worse. Ash isn't even super strong because most competent decks can extend past an ash, as such it helps slow down decks forcing them to end on weaker boards rather than just end their turn, whereas droll is beyond brutal. And you need to weaken the opponent, modern decks are designed to completely steamroll you if their combo goes off even midrangey decks will end on 3 disruptions and crackback for t3 otk or control decks will set up a shitload of advantage ensuring they outgrind you over time. Ash being able to counter most tutor from the deck type effects makes it wellrounded and ensures no matter what you're up against you at least have something you can use to at least have a fighting chance going 2nd.

  • @thaisennj9781
    @thaisennj9781 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without it I can’t even fathom the idea of dealing with mfs 300 turn plays

  • @auenboy4571
    @auenboy4571 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My problem with ash is that it hurts weaker decks more than the stronger ones due to the stronger ones being pushed by Konami to be able to play though things like ash.
    Honestly to keep a card like ash and all the cards that are too strong that ash stops the game needs a core change.
    Dealing 8k dmg is too easy. Summoning boss monsters is too easy. And board breakers are too easy to use. Almost nothing requires any sort of commitment. The only mechanic that has a downside at the moment is traps and even those are getting out of hand with some decks and staples.

  • @TodaWars
    @TodaWars 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honestly i would go further in a different way.
    Limit all/most generic handtraps and floodgates.
    See how it goes and hit all generic boss monsters.
    There needs to be a bigger focus on archetypes by now.
    Most new cards lack any restriction that are meaning full. Superheavy samurai, snake eyes. There end board is what generic stuff.
    I personally love spyral standing alone it can do all and is fair.

  • @SlaytonSlaytonSlayton
    @SlaytonSlaytonSlayton 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yessss! Yugioh used to ban cards that were ran in every deck but for some reason, Ash and Maxx C have been allowed to run rampant and basically be the core focus of the game for so long now. It's so lame when the Ash + Roach minigame is the deciding factor in like over half of the games you play. I don't even care what it does to the meta, just get rid of these fucks and make the game more about what's on the BOARD and not what go-fish hand trap you happen to have.