the scene from one of the twilight movies where bella was pregnant and the baby was basically eating her alive. That was actually some pretty good special fx she looked so emaciated in the last half of the movie.
4:40 "because if there's anything that's going to make a show relatable to young people, it's flawless looking actors with perfect skin complaining about being unattractive" Respect Looper, respect. 4:28 "this didn't "zit" well with the producers" OUT.
Hailley Wilson try being 38 with folliculitis all over your body and being covered in very deep scars, acne like blemishes and chicken pox scars that you could more than play dot to dot or it looking worse than permanent motion capture marks
Tattoos take a very long time to cover with make up and the results are often mixed. More often than not you can still see the tattoos under the make up. Then take into account that make up runs and fades while you have it on, blending skin tones over random shades of ink is incredibly tricky, and while you have your extremely over paid actors on set, you need them filming scenes, not sat in a make up chair receiving endless touch ups over something you'll still see in the end result anyway. It's far easier to film the scene as is, and then pay somebody to take their time and painstakingly remove the tattoo over months.
Cos it don't work well. It's been done in the past, CGI removes Tattoos completely. Henry Rollins had his Black Flag tattoos hidden by Makeup in a couple of TV shows and moovies I saw him in, there was a lil blotch on his neck haha.
oh man there was so much work for these effect, especially on the last one about iron man ....that so explains why the ACTORS get paid 100s of millions of dollars
stryfetc1 the quality of the movies have nothing to do with the quality of the CGI. Even though I’m a DC fan I still have to agree the movies haven’t been the best. I hope they don’t screw Aquaman and Shazam up
U guys are so dumb they didn't have enough time to make it look clean and they also didn't have enough money for it because a lot of money was used to reshoots
I'm on the minority that thinks he looks better now. He's one of those few people that not only aged well, but looks better than when he was younger. He's essentially like fine wine :)
It's been going on for a lot longer than that. Robert Redford is only 5'4". Most of his movies had him standing on boxes to look as tall as his co-stars.
Ant Man and the Wasp’s opening scene had me like Robert Downey Jr. at the end of this video: “my god, she was beautiful!” Then she shows up again later in the movie looking pretty much the same. What a woman.
I think it’s safe to say that Marvel has cornered the market on superhero flashbacks, although it helps immensely that most of the people they’ve de-aged have had long film careers so there is plenty of archival material to pull from. I guess that’s why they couldn’t get Henry Cavill’s moustache of...?
best CGI is invisible (doesn't get noticed in the movie). that's why its wrong to say CGI sucks in general, because we only ever get to see the badly made ones.
To be fair, I guess some CGI does suck in the case of those that are meant to be seen. Comparing for example AVATAR and TRANSFORMERS, then the quality would not be based on being invisible but instead being believable, i.e. to blend in with the real world and not enter "uncanny valley." Also of course a different criteria again for Animated Movies such as those by Pixar. But yeah in general CGI in live action movies were meant to be invisible. Sometimes tho it really is meant to be seen and be awesome.
"Captain Marvel" is expected to be the first film to use the de-aging effect for nearly the entire movie, in this case on Samuel L. Jackson as a younger Nick Fury.
Nice try Kurt, you're all wrinkled up. His face is a road map. Ain't no way makeup is gonna smooth all that out! If there was a way, we 50 somethings would know.
Did ya ever think he was pulling your leg??? Besides, his youngest son is the spitting image of him... His 12 year old son (Wesley) played his character's youth scene in Soldier. Kurt is nearing seventy, he knows he's not a "heartthrob" anymore. 😂😂😂
the glee pimple thing also makes sense from a continuity perspective. Episodes usually take 7-8 days and not usually filmed in order, zits could change from scene to scene so I can understand that.
I though the young Tony Stark scene looked fake.. I though the same with the Star Wars ones with Luke and Leya in Episode IX also. The one with Kirk Russel was very very good. The one from X-Men was good for most of it, but there were part where it looked faked. At the matter of fact, the same issues that made X-Men, young Tony, Leya/Luke is the same thing for all of them. Oh yea. Capt American was nicely done as well.
Suchart Boontid check around TH-cam,probably around the marvel TH-cam channel and/or any behind the scenes footage for the movie itself,honestly..eh..???!
Not necessary. For a tatoo it would have been pretty thick make up. That could look weird and a long makeup session before many shoots cost hours each day. and Sets are fcking expensive.
Time is money on movie sets. Every minute. We cover up background actors tattoos but if you're talking about a big movie star , the amount of time having them in the chair AND on set isn't worth it. People getting paid to cover up digitally get paid less than people in front of the camera.
It was amazing seeing a young Tony Stark in *Civil War* looked pretty real. edit: wow didn't think it would be number 1 though. (yes I am far behind in the MCU)
This movies don't even compare to the new technology of Deep Fake. Search TH-camr and see how Jim Carrey's face is put on Jack Nicholson's face in Shinning. Be prepared to have you mind blown, and all this was made by a guy with a computer and an app at home.
Indeed. Also Bruce Boxleitner in the same movie. A couple of the shots of Clu are truly uncanny, like the de-aging effect didn't quite land. But, then, Clu being in the uncanny valley does kind of work.
LMAO at 1:26-1:36 "Closely followed by overseeing the hiring process of a suitable butt double for Johnson.....Nicolas Cage" I know that's not how it was meant to sound and is just a segue but I still laughed thinking Cage was the butt double.
No mention of Brandon Routh in Superman Returns? His package had to be digitally reduced in size because it was described as "distractingly large". The producers didn't think that Superman should be quite so well hung. So there you have it folks, according to the producers of Superman Returns, Superman has every super power, except the one that counts *nudge nudge wink wink*.
I am sick of Captain America being an example of good CGI or unexpected CGI. It is incredibly and painfully obvious that the short and skinny Cap is not Chris Evans. It was obvious when it first came out, it should be more obvious now.
@Can't Think Of A Name I don't have to admit that. I don't agree with that. I walked in on my roommates watching it, pointed out how fake it was, and laughed at the rest of that part of the movie. It was not good.
Actually I thought they had just digitally resized him. I didn't think they used a body double. They should have just put him on a diet to make him skinny then faked everything else with forced perspective. Then have him build up for the Cap scenes.
IMO, the team at Lola for Captain America was absolutely snubbed for an Oscar that year. Their work was astonishingly good. They've been doing consistently great since, and still no Oscar.
King Merck ?Because the movie was one of the biggest in the last decade? because it was one of the worst jobs done in the history of CGI? Because it actually made the movie worse? Because i said so....?
this list is about enhancement/cgi of actors.... and yes whether we like it or not JL is one of the biggest grossing movies in the last decade (top20 at least)
1. Dakota Johnson in 50 shades when she was naked. CGI had to give her bushes. And the guy had a butt double. 2. Nicholas Cage in ghost rider has a ghost rider tattoo so they had to hide it. They say his abs were cgi but Eva Mendez says they were real. 3 Christian narit in games of thrones. His penis was fake it was a prosthetic penis. Airbrushing out a thong he had to wear. Paul Rubens (peewee Hermin) cgi was used with makeup and tape was used to de age the actor. 4. The cast of Glee, they all had acne covered on their faces cause they ugly. Jk 5. Jessica alba on being naked in 2010 “machete” she wasn’t actually nude they used cgi underwear. 6. About homeland, cover Danes baby bump. Not important ... 7. Captain America Steve Rogers, obviously his body was cgi for the first movie. 8.. this list is too long I’m done
Re: #7 - The cgi on Chris Evans' body in CA The First Avenger was in putting his face over the face of the skinny guy that they hired to play the pre - super soldier Steve Rogers.
I was looking for this comment. I am glad someone posted it. I actually like the older version of RDJ more. He is ruggedly handsome now. Back then he was soft and pretty.
I like Dakota Johnson, she's unique but I think that that role didn't suit her. Kat Dennings (IMO) is more voluptuous and bit more attractive than Natalie, but I think that's up to personal preference. Natalie is just really tiny, cute girl though.
That's a good question. I've heard some actresses actually can't because already have laser or they've been waxed so much that the hair doesn't come back or it comes back funny. But even then there are little wigs for that. I think they're called "merkins". I think that would still be cheaper than digital hairs.😄
You need to check your anxiety level. I like the bsckground music cause I listen to the commentary only and music fades away but still makes it more fun
Nick: You like comic books consequently, you end up in over-the-top hooky bad movies. It was funny/strange and interesting in Kiss of Death. Most of your movies are too similar now.
Really?! Just going to completely ignore Angelina Jolie's breasts digitally enhanced (enlarged) during her run as Lara Croft in the Tomb raider franchise? Really?!
I don't know about you guys but whenever I see CGI like this in movies I remain unconvinced. I find it easy to spot. The only one I didn't know that was CGI was Jessica Alba's, I'm guessing because I didn't really focus on her because Michelle Rodriguez was much hotter in that movie.
8:37 NO, the ACTOR worked to recreate his mannerisms, modellers worked to recreate his appearance and animators matched the mannerisms to the appearance.
Honestly in Rouge one, it was super obvious that Tarken was digitally recreated, I noticed it the moment I saw the character, I didn’t even remember it from the last movies but It was visually very obvious he was digitally recreated.
CGI nudity is so stupid. What is the point of not doing nudity if you have it digitally altered to make people think you did? Just stand up for yourself and take a hard stance and say no.
Because film is a collaborative effort. The director or producer or studio might want a nude scene, the actor doesn't want to do it, so CGI or a body double is the compromise.
The way they worded it about Dakota was a bit rude, not gonna lie. Like I don’t particularly like her, but leave the girl alone about whether she chooses to shave or not - is it hurting you? 🤷🏼♀️
Curtis Joseph That would be fair enough in pretty much every other case, but for that fact that choosing to shave “down there” is an extremely personal and individual thing, that doesn’t actually really affect anyone and shouldn’t be scrutinised - even if one is acting in such an explicit film.
I'm pretty sure it's only being commented on because the film makers used cgi to give her character pubic hair. It's directly related to the subject of this video
Wijaya NKS no no no I thought they looked like 26-27 year-olds when I watched 😂 and mistakenly think that all Americans are supposedly that old looking
Even with today computer wizardry, Leia and Tarkin is not that convincing as a real person. They still looks uncannily creepy like computer game cinematic. Although a very good game cinematic.
There's a couple of times on here where the effects are referred to as Special Effects. Special Effects deal with on set effects done captured on camera mostly focused with the use of on set pyrotechnics. Visual Effects is what is done in post production with the use of computers or other shots blending techniques, this can include blending multiple on camera lighting passes as it was done back in the day during the first Star Wars and Back to the Future.
TheLaydewlf I was referring more to great films like The Godfather are all about story and characters but film makers at the current time are obsessed with relying on special effects and making weak films.
Now don't be a curmudgeon. Besides good scripts rarely make it out of pre-production, and CGI artists are cheap as cannon fodder. Just ask Michael Bay if you don't believe me.
![ได้เวลา! พาน้องแฝดฉีดวัคซีนครบ 1 เดือน🫣 [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.52 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IzeLtaXBLNE/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] FS vs BME - VCT Ascension Pacific - Lower Bracket Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnygqsR2Fig/mqdefault.jpg)
What other digitally enhanced roles should've made this list?
Jeff Bridges, Tron: Legacy.
Henry civil or cavil Superman mustache 💀🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣💀💀
the scene from one of the twilight movies where bella was pregnant and the baby was basically eating her alive. That was actually some pretty good special fx she looked so emaciated in the last half of the movie.
Arnold in Terminator Genisys
Dat baby was horrifying tho
4:40 "because if there's anything that's going to make a show relatable to young people, it's flawless looking actors with perfect skin complaining about being unattractive"
Respect Looper, respect.
4:28 "this didn't "zit" well with the producers"
OUT.
And then in shows where they do worry about a break out, it's one zit! And here I am at 28 still having break outs.
Lol
I am the 500th like
Hailley Wilson try being 38 with folliculitis all over your body and being covered in very deep scars, acne like blemishes and chicken pox scars that you could more than play dot to dot or it looking worse than permanent motion capture marks
rescinded when they use the term "baby bump" 5:53
I gotta think it would be easier and cheaper to cover tattoos with makeup rather than CGI.
I want to believe that too. I dont understand why they didn't but they must have had a decent reason
Tattoos take a very long time to cover with make up and the results are often mixed. More often than not you can still see the tattoos under the make up. Then take into account that make up runs and fades while you have it on, blending skin tones over random shades of ink is incredibly tricky, and while you have your extremely over paid actors on set, you need them filming scenes, not sat in a make up chair receiving endless touch ups over something you'll still see in the end result anyway.
It's far easier to film the scene as is, and then pay somebody to take their time and painstakingly remove the tattoo over months.
make up can't even cover my dark circle properly, i believe it's harder for that big and colorful tattoos.
Its simply wasteful to spend that amount of $ on this stuff
Cos it don't work well. It's been done in the past, CGI removes Tattoos completely. Henry Rollins had his Black Flag tattoos hidden by Makeup in a couple of TV shows and moovies I saw him in, there was a lil blotch on his neck haha.
The following was brought to you by Lola Visual Effects. When you question reality it's Lola.
imho they should have just left the tattoo for Cage, it would have actually been a really subtle 4th wall break
Trimming her private area...OMG the Cinematographer actually commented on this in an interview... Hollywood, never stops amazing me with weirdness.
oh man
there was so much work for these effect, especially on the last one about iron man
....that so explains why the ACTORS get paid 100s of millions of dollars
I don’t get why they didn’t just get a hot girl instead of doing all that work to fix Dakota Johnson
Why are we even using actors at all at this point?
Just use sock puppets instead of actors. I am sure you can digitally make them look like people.
Wow marvel can make their actors young but DC can't remove a moustache
Word
The movie was rushed by WB and they had to make the effects, rewrites and reshoots in just a few months, that's why the movie has so much flaws.
stryfetc1 the quality of the movies have nothing to do with the quality of the CGI. Even though I’m a DC fan I still have to agree the movies haven’t been the best. I hope they don’t screw Aquaman and Shazam up
Wonder Woman was good, though I would definitely buy a Directors Cut where they added a big 'ol handlebar mustache to Diana for the entire film.
U guys are so dumb they didn't have enough time to make it look clean and they also didn't have enough money for it because a lot of money was used to reshoots
The last comment from Robert Downey Jr was hilarious: "omg, he was so beautiful! What happened?" :P
I think he looks better older. He's aged really well.
then it was ruined by jimmy fallon
he looked good both times! he was hot in the 80s (my time frame) and he has aged into a very handsome gentleman.
I'm on the minority that thinks he looks better now. He's one of those few people that not only aged well, but looks better than when he was younger. He's essentially like fine wine :)
Honest they didn't get his young cuteness correct they- they didn't make his lips or eyes full enough.
I love Robert Downey Jr. So happy he finally got sober and reclaimed his life. He's an example of never giving up.
2degucitas He's awesome
Hopefully we don’t get another demi lavato situation
why did you have to be so negative. don't joke about addiction like that it's no joking matter.
aundrea hodges who’s being negative? What are you on about? 🤔
@@evelynnmartinez8052 Come on dude, you didn't have to bring that up.
Since the 80s Hollywood has made Tom Cruise appear as tall as his co-stars... Now THATS hollywood magic!
In Interview with the Vampire Brad Pitt walked in a trench that was dug alongside of Tom Cruise in order to even out their heights.
That's how ridiculous he is about his image
They were doing that with William Shatner in Star Trek. Leonard Nimoy was taller so every scene with the two Shatner had to be placed higher.
Mulder and Scully?
It's been going on for a lot longer than that. Robert Redford is only 5'4". Most of his movies had him standing on boxes to look as tall as his co-stars.
Marvel is nailing it with the de-aging. It didn't even look off to me in Antman & the Wasp
Captain Marvel will be the first film to use it for the whole movie, on Samuel L. Jackson.
next ASSman and the WOP
Ant Man and the Wasp’s opening scene had me like Robert Downey Jr. at the end of this video: “my god, she was beautiful!”
Then she shows up again later in the movie looking pretty much the same. What a woman.
but ... it was mostly Lola not Marvel. They just paid a ridiculous sum for the hard work.
They used some of that on Brie Larson's ass to make it look bigger. Well that and the ass model
Where is the mustache at?
LitCaveman Thank God, I thought I was living in the matrix. I have seen this video on some other channel.
That thing can't be called an enhancement at all, it's an embarrassment.
LitCaveman every example discussed in this video is of REMARKABLE CGI.... NOT A CRAPPY ONE
@@Vishrut.Dave94 Agreed.
No one can top that
The Glee one kinda pisses me off actually...
So pointless... Completely unnecessary.
@@plumdutchess what do you mean?
I knew their faces looked weirdly too smooth & poreless...
More believable to show teens with acne!
TheMadisonPaige only someone with bad skin would be offended by that🤷🏼♀️
They did a great job with Michael Douglas in Ant-Man too.
Mark Spalding yes also Kurt Russel in GoftG2.
They looked exactly like in the 80es :-)
True but at the same time it was hard to believe even de-aged Michael Douglas had the six pack that his Ant Man sported.
Not to mention RDJ in Civil War
I think it’s safe to say that Marvel has cornered the market on superhero flashbacks, although it helps immensely that most of the people they’ve de-aged have had long film careers so there is plenty of archival material to pull from. I guess that’s why they couldn’t get Henry Cavill’s moustache of...?
You didn't mention about Scarlett Johansson, she's pregnant in Avengers Age Of Ultron? and was used with CGI
Or Wonder Woman
@@kimberleymorris8052 ..yes they did but they also combine with CGI to make it perfect
best CGI is invisible (doesn't get noticed in the movie). that's why its wrong to say CGI sucks in general, because we only ever get to see the badly made ones.
@@MrSuckeragi yep... I'm a big fan of *VFX(CGI)* if it's flop i blame the vfx supervisors
To be fair, I guess some CGI does suck in the case of those that are meant to be seen. Comparing for example AVATAR and TRANSFORMERS, then the quality would not be based on being invisible but instead being believable, i.e. to blend in with the real world and not enter "uncanny valley." Also of course a different criteria again for Animated Movies such as those by Pixar. But yeah in general CGI in live action movies were meant to be invisible. Sometimes tho it really is meant to be seen and be awesome.
You should've had Henry Cavill on the list for no moustache in Justice League
Also "this didn't ZIT well" was hilarious
Noah Bowie i was about to comment that 😂
Removing cavils mustache was the worst cgi
I love the de-ageing effect in the MCU. All the 4-5 actors they did it to looked perfect
"Captain Marvel" is expected to be the first film to use the de-aging effect for nearly the entire movie, in this case on Samuel L. Jackson as a younger Nick Fury.
Yeah Marvel have nailed it. De-aged RDJ was astonishing. Especially if you're familiar with his early work.
Nice try Kurt, you're all wrinkled up. His face is a road map. Ain't no way makeup is gonna smooth all that out! If there was a way, we 50 somethings would know.
Did ya ever think he was pulling your leg??? Besides, his youngest son is the spitting image of him... His 12 year old son (Wesley) played his character's youth scene in Soldier. Kurt is nearing seventy, he knows he's not a "heartthrob" anymore. 😂😂😂
I loved Robert's comment, "My god he was so beautiful, what happened" Bwahaha
the glee pimple thing also makes sense from a continuity perspective. Episodes usually take 7-8 days and not usually filmed in order, zits could change from scene to scene so I can understand that.
Couldve just not hired Dakota Johnson at all, saved a lot of time and money
Hayden Rollyson or they just could have had her remove the hair in that area
I wonder how she matched up to Sharon Stone`s infamous scene in Basic instinct?
Heather Miller or just not hire Dakota Johnson at all
But nepotism..
nicolesamsonite what?
Gal Godot was pregnant too during wonder woman shooting
@brasil1973 horizonte For the last time, I didn't have sexual relations with that woman-Bill Clinton
Michael Lefort why’d u put that there
@@svhwdwnut because I don't like Bill Clinton and I don't want him taking credit for it.
@@michaellefort6128 "In and out. Not a moment longer." GWB
A dude gives birth, truly a wonder
Should have digitally erased the entire movie Skyscraper..
I though the young Tony Stark scene looked fake.. I though the same with the Star Wars ones with Luke and Leya in Episode IX also. The one with Kirk Russel was very very good. The one from X-Men was good for most of it, but there were part where it looked faked. At the matter of fact, the same issues that made X-Men, young Tony, Leya/Luke is the same thing for all of them.
Oh yea. Capt American was nicely done as well.
Ok, where can I find all this pre-cgi shirtless Captain America footage? Asking for a friend...
Suchart Boontid check around TH-cam,probably around the marvel TH-cam channel and/or any behind the scenes footage for the movie itself,honestly..eh..???!
Can you add cgi to make Dakota Johnson interesting?
Musa Bloom in a word, NO.
CGI, much like drinks, does not work that way.
Musa Bloom yes
Thanks for that, I can't stop laughing.
Dude...if only.
wouldn't it be cheaper to cover up the tattoo with makeup?
Not necessary. For a tatoo it would have been pretty thick make up. That could look weird and a long makeup session before many shoots cost hours each day. and Sets are fcking expensive.
Time is money on movie sets. Every minute. We cover up background actors tattoos but if you're talking about a big movie star , the amount of time having them in the chair AND on set isn't worth it. People getting paid to cover up digitally get paid less than people in front of the camera.
It was amazing seeing a young Tony Stark in *Civil War* looked pretty real.
edit: wow didn't think it would be number 1 though. (yes I am far behind in the MCU)
Caring Is Creepy Damn....it did look really good though.
right!? when I first saw the movie I didn't even recognize it was Robert Downey... thought I was watching *Ferris Bueller's Day Off*
This movies don't even compare to the new technology of Deep Fake. Search TH-camr and see how Jim Carrey's face is put on Jack Nicholson's face in Shinning. Be prepared to have you mind blown, and all this was made by a guy with a computer and an app at home.
You should have had Bojack Horseman for Secretariat
Say whaaaaaaaaaaaaat?🐴
Neigh way Jose
I didn't even realize!! They did an amazing job!!
Tron : Legacy ? Jeff Bridges ?
Vornicu Andrei yeah, and this was back in 2010, when something like this was revolutionary
Indeed. Also Bruce Boxleitner in the same movie.
A couple of the shots of Clu are truly uncanny, like the de-aging effect didn't quite land. But, then, Clu being in the uncanny valley does kind of work.
Omg, I can't believe I forgot that one...TRON. I must have seen it 20x and yes, the digital effects were amazing!
Maybe they lied to Kurt Russell
Or he's lying to himself that he doesn't really look that old...
They Milli Vanillied him.
@@@Janexcalibur, Word.
@@Janexcalibur 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He sounded so proud of himself explaining.. aww the cringe afterwards 😅😅😅🤣🤣..gosh I still love him nontheless
LMAO at 1:26-1:36 "Closely followed by overseeing the hiring process of a suitable butt double for Johnson.....Nicolas Cage"
I know that's not how it was meant to sound and is just a segue but I still laughed thinking Cage was the butt double.
Christian Bale would drop that weight for Captain America in a heartbeat and then gain it back in no time, the man is an absolute legend
Ash Mozumder Yeah, but I don't think he would play a good Captain America.
it's dangerous and very unhealthy to do that in a shot period of time.
Because he's BATMAN!!
jasonjo1993 he'd play the best captain america...
Eddie Perez
He played the best Batman, but best Captain America? i don't thin so.
No mention of Brandon Routh in Superman Returns? His package had to be digitally reduced in size because it was described as "distractingly large". The producers didn't think that Superman should be quite so well hung. So there you have it folks, according to the producers of Superman Returns, Superman has every super power, except the one that counts *nudge nudge wink wink*.
I understand they had the same problem with Burt Ward on the old Batman TV series.
Forgot Michael Douglas's deaging for both Ant Man films where he appears as a younger Hank Pym.
I was enjoying this video and then Jimmy Fallon's fake laugh ruins it at the end.
LOL
*Looper* forgot.... well... *Looper*
Bruce Willis, Joseph Levitt CGI was spot.
As far as I can remember that was all practical
I am sick of Captain America being an example of good CGI or unexpected CGI. It is incredibly and painfully obvious that the short and skinny Cap is not Chris Evans. It was obvious when it first came out, it should be more obvious now.
Right? His head is too damn big and you can clearly see that the neck size doesn't correspond to a natural neck size compared to his jaw
@@DeadKraken
Why are there so few of us?
@Can't Think Of A Name
I don't have to admit that. I don't agree with that. I walked in on my roommates watching it, pointed out how fake it was, and laughed at the rest of that part of the movie.
It was not good.
Actually I thought they had just digitally resized him. I didn't think they used a body double.
They should have just put him on a diet to make him skinny then faked everything else with forced perspective. Then have him build up for the Cap scenes.
@@Uhfgood
While that probably would have worked better, it would have been extremely unhealthy for him.
IMO, the team at Lola for Captain America was absolutely snubbed for an Oscar that year. Their work was astonishingly good. They've been doing consistently great since, and still no Oscar.
That's because the Oscars are rigged to hell and back like they always have been since the beginning of time.
no mention of the horrendous job done with Henry Cavill's stache in JL ???? Shame on you Looper
Why would they add that though?
King Merck ?Because the movie was one of the biggest in the last decade? because it was one of the worst jobs done in the history of CGI? Because it actually made the movie worse? Because i said so....?
IWreck did you even read the title of the video? Thats not what the list is about.
IWreck also you must not watch alot of movies if you thinks its one of the biggest of the decade lol
this list is about enhancement/cgi of actors.... and yes whether we like it or not JL is one of the biggest grossing movies in the last decade (top20 at least)
1. Dakota Johnson in 50 shades when she was naked. CGI had to give her bushes. And the guy had a butt double.
2. Nicholas Cage in ghost rider has a ghost rider tattoo so they had to hide it. They say his abs were cgi but Eva Mendez says they were real.
3 Christian narit in games of thrones. His penis was fake it was a prosthetic penis. Airbrushing out a thong he had to wear.
Paul Rubens (peewee Hermin) cgi was used with makeup and tape was used to de age the actor.
4. The cast of Glee, they all had acne covered on their faces cause they ugly. Jk
5. Jessica alba on being naked in 2010 “machete” she wasn’t actually nude they used cgi underwear.
6. About homeland, cover Danes baby bump. Not important ...
7. Captain America Steve Rogers, obviously his body was cgi for the first movie.
8.. this list is too long I’m done
"CGI had to give her bushes?" Hell, who was the lucky bastard with that job??!!
@@netgrok the director says that was fun on the clip. He also says he chose her butt. Also removed Bush not added.
utubedestroysmytime no they added, pay attention to the video
Re: #7 - The cgi on Chris Evans' body in CA The First Avenger was in putting his face over the face of the skinny guy that they hired to play the pre - super soldier Steve Rogers.
Seems like an advertisement for Lola Visual Effects.
They have to edit out acne in shows because of continuity.
You're still beautiful , Robert Downey Junior.
I was looking for this comment. I am glad someone posted it. I actually like the older version of RDJ more. He is ruggedly handsome now. Back then he was soft and pretty.
I like Dakota Johnson, she's unique but I think that that role didn't suit her. Kat Dennings (IMO) is more voluptuous and bit more attractive than Natalie, but I think that's up to personal preference. Natalie is just really tiny, cute girl though.
couldn't they leave dakota grow her own bush? :D i mean that costed money
That's a good question. I've heard some actresses actually can't because already have laser or they've been waxed so much that the hair doesn't come back or it comes back funny. But even then there are little wigs for that. I think they're called "merkins". I think that would still be cheaper than digital hairs.😄
Nicole Cage need digital... what ever. It’s called body paint.
I'm fine with listening to the repeated background "music" for a couple of minutes, but for 12 minutes?! No thanks...
Christoffer Hannevig it's kind of like Muzak to me, I didn't really notice it over the commentary
Christoffer Hannevig yeah
You need to check your anxiety level. I like the bsckground music cause I listen to the commentary only and music fades away but still makes it more fun
Interesting video guys. Thanks for it
irina1296 i can’t tell if your being sarcastic or not
The fact that you talked about Fifty Shades of Grey gives you negative points.
I always find it hilarious when they justify the need of CGI for tattoos, ya'll have heard of concealer right?
Call me weird but i think i would have loved to see Dakota Johnson's rug.
Learn from Marilyn Monroe:" A girl's smile is her best makeup."
paul rubin still looks incredibly young already so clearly it wasnt that bad or too neccessary editing and i am actually surprised of his age.
“If you can imagine it, the movie industry can spend a couple hundred million to put it up on the big screen.” But Harry Potter has blue eyes.
I don't get it. Did he have brown eyes in the book or something?
brileeka Green, and they talk about it in the books constantly.
@@Psychomech5 hmm well blue always seemed more fitting to me because my mom's madien name is Potter and they all have black hair and blue eyes.
the de aging of kurt Russell in Gaurdians 2 was very good
Nick: You like comic books consequently, you end up in over-the-top hooky bad movies. It was funny/strange and interesting in Kiss of Death. Most of your movies are too similar now.
This list has to be like 1% of the complete list.
Really?! Just going to completely ignore Angelina Jolie's breasts digitally enhanced (enlarged) during her run as Lara Croft in the Tomb raider franchise? Really?!
Ahhhh, Kurt Russell!! No matter what age he's a dreamboat.
I don't know about you guys but whenever I see CGI like this in movies I remain unconvinced. I find it easy to spot. The only one I didn't know that was CGI was Jessica Alba's, I'm guessing because I didn't really focus on her because Michelle Rodriguez was much hotter in that movie.
In Thor the dark world kat dennings was actually de enhanced so that to highlight Natalie Portman coz kat is obviously way hotter than Natalie
Shrey Vaghela wait really?
Chyna Hardy yup I’m talking about kat dennings boobs
Kat Dennings is extremely hot I love her
Shrey Vaghela big facts.kat is sooooo hot 😩🤤
Boobs don't make u hot.
"What happened?"
You grew older, just like everybody else.
The Star Wars CGI recreations looked like animated wax figures.
I work in VFX, all the best enhancements you will never even know about.
8:37 NO, the ACTOR worked to recreate his mannerisms, modellers worked to recreate his appearance and animators matched the mannerisms to the appearance.
Oliver Reed from Gladiator.
I thought they were gonna talk about Dakota’s forehead lmao
"My God, he was beautiful. What happened?"
Honestly in Rouge one, it was super obvious that Tarken was digitally recreated, I noticed it the moment I saw the character, I didn’t even remember it from the last movies but It was visually very obvious he was digitally recreated.
Didn't remember Tarkin? Get out! Lol
dang! A young Kurt Russell yummie!😉
everyone on Glee were WAY too old to be playing teens. not the only reason why it sucked though
CGI nudity is so stupid. What is the point of not doing nudity if you have it digitally altered to make people think you did? Just stand up for yourself and take a hard stance and say no.
Because film is a collaborative effort. The director or producer or studio might want a nude scene, the actor doesn't want to do it, so CGI or a body double is the compromise.
Hard Stance!!!!
Hahahahahaha
@@Janexcalibur too afraid to show some skin? LEAVE THE ACTING SCENE
LobsterPuncher totally
50 shades of grey movies are crap and should be removed from the market
Ethan Aleman that's your opinion
hector solis everyone thinks the same as ethan you're the only one who thinks 50 shades of grey movies are good.
aundrea hodges Clearly, that is why they were such a huge box-office success?
Toby Maguire's hair was fixed in a movie to make him mostly bald instead of paying him $30,000 to shave it
The way they worded it about Dakota was a bit rude, not gonna lie. Like I don’t particularly like her, but leave the girl alone about whether she chooses to shave or not - is it hurting you? 🤷🏼♀️
Really though. The idea of someone being attacked over having pubic hair is ridiculous.
After all it's called Pubic hair, not Public hair!
The salaries commanded by the actors says that such a sacrifice be worth a discussion.
Curtis Joseph That would be fair enough in pretty much every other case, but for that fact that choosing to shave “down there” is an extremely personal and individual thing, that doesn’t actually really affect anyone and shouldn’t be scrutinised - even if one is acting in such an explicit film.
I'm pretty sure it's only being commented on because the film makers used cgi to give her character pubic hair. It's directly related to the subject of this video
Clearly you've forgotten young Johnny Depp in the 5th part of the Pirates of the caribbean
As Asian, most of Glee cast look like old graduates from University
"old graduates from University" like 21-24 is old? LMFAO what?? But yeah teenagers should play teens on tv shows.
fancydeer yup
So Asian’s are better at guessing the ages of other races now are they?
Wijaya NKS no no no I thought they looked like 26-27 year-olds when I watched 😂 and mistakenly think that all Americans are supposedly that old looking
Wijaya NKS, Most of the cast of Glee aren't Asian.
CALLING BULLSHIT on “Cage” as comic tribute. He did it to avoid trading on family name - which, DUH, means ‘cage’ in Italian.
henry cavill's mustache?
Michael Douglas- Antman
Johnny Depp - Pirates Of Caribbean:Dead men tell no tales
"My God he was beautiful, what happened!?" I love RDJ so much 😂😂
missed Samuel Jackson in captain marvel
Don't worry Robert, you're still beautiful! 🥰
No mention of Blade Runner 2049 for Rachel? Ok.
Actor Hugh Laurie has a huge baldspot
His character House does not
Hair added post-production
What we learned from this video:
Marvels got it *DOWN*
Chris Evans- the only actor too buff for the big screen.
Even with today computer wizardry, Leia and Tarkin is not that convincing as a real person. They still looks uncannily creepy like computer game cinematic. Although a very good game cinematic.
Oneee 😁😁😁😁😁
remember when actresses and actors actually were nude ? Remember when only some make up was used to cover freckles/moles...
Why does it matter
@@darpur5469 gee real hot vs fake hot is like real car crashes vs cgi car crashes
Where's Michael Douglas from ant man and Joseph Gordon Levitt from looper, it's literally your name lol
Joseph Gordon Levitt was wearing a prosthetic nose in Looper, not CGI.
There's a couple of times on here where the effects are referred to as Special Effects. Special Effects deal with on set effects done captured on camera mostly focused with the use of on set pyrotechnics. Visual Effects is what is done in post production with the use of computers or other shots blending techniques, this can include blending multiple on camera lighting passes as it was done back in the day during the first Star Wars and Back to the Future.
Also missed the one in BvS when they CGId Henry Cavil Hair line so it would look like he is not balding and it wouldn’t be distracting
Captain Z Really? Neat
I think the reason that Jessica Alba gives for not doing full frontal nudity is really, REALLY lame.
How about eliminating the magic of special effects and just writing a good original script :)
do you think star wars would have been nearly as incredible in 1978 without all of its incredible special affects innovations?
TheLaydewlf I was referring more to great films like The Godfather are all about story and characters but film makers at the current time are obsessed with relying on special effects and making weak films.
Now don't be a curmudgeon. Besides good scripts rarely make it out of pre-production, and CGI artists are cheap as cannon fodder. Just ask Michael Bay if you don't believe me.