I love the clear description of the subjunctive in modern English. Spanish uses the subjunctive as well and Spanish students say all the time how great it is that English doesn't have that sort of thing. LOL!!! I try to explain but since it is so rarely used it's hard to get them to understand the rule. In Spanish, was = fue. But, "if I were a rich man" = si yo fuera un hombre rico. The difference is in "fue" and "fuera" where fue is the past tense and fuera is the subjunctive.
Brilliantly informative video! I want to make a few points: It is important to remember that "Old English" was not internally static on grammar and phonology. It's kind of like how there wasn't suddenly a load of frications of stops, monophthongisations, and vowel phoneme convergences in Greek the moment Alexander the Great died, but the massive pronunciation change (mostly bad, if you ask me) that is called "Koine Greek phonology" happened gradually, over around 600 years. Old English didn't suddenly and exactly become Middle English as soon as Duke William of Normandy was crowned King William of England on 25/12/1066. While someone probably ought to learn about the extensively morphological case system if they're serious about learning Old English, they should probably also be aware that it was already mostly degraded before interference by Old French and Anglo-Norman dealt it the final blow, having suffered interference by Old Norse (due to a desire for ON-OE mutual intelligibility in the Danelaw) and redundancy through non-phonemic laxing. Until relatively recently, I was under the impression that, while the case system was extensively declensional, the verb system wasn't much more conjugational than in Modern English, but then I read that it was. This video confirms my suspicion that it still wasn't as conjugational as Latin or even as Spanish. The 1st and 3rd person singular morphological equivalence in past tense, however, _does_ remind me of the same deal in Spanish's imperfect tense and in Spanish's conditional aspect. Now, I want to discuss mood and tense. You said that Old English only has 2 tenses while Latin has 6, and that Modern English doesn't use the subjunctive mood very much. This is true if you only count morphological difference as different tense or mood. I don't, and I believe most don't. As you point out, participles in OE can take auxiliary verbs like to be and to have. These would standardly form progressive/continuous and perfect tenses, would they not? And Modern English, as you point out, doesn't have much morphological subjunctive mood. But much subjunctive mood, it still has. It's just that it's usually not conveyed by inflection but just using adverbs like "perhaps" and aux modal verbs like "may" and "might", as well as indirect-statement verbs like to doubt and to wish, as well as the "let [accusative subject]" construct (for the jussive subjunctive).
Excellent class! At first I was afraid I wouldn't be able to benefit from the charts due to the tiny letters - they're unfeasible to my poor eyesight - but when you started showing each item with bigger letters I was relieved:-) Thank you so much,I've subscribed to the channel giving the due thumbs up and sharing this awesome video!
Interesting tidbit on your accent. Your English is so good that I assumed that you are English. But there was something unusual about your accent: it is intermittently rhotic. I looked at the description and saw that you are Dutch.
This is excellent! Are there more of these? You mention in several videos, that you plan to dive more deeply into certain topics (such as i-mutation). Are those available anywhere? Even for purchase or download?
Thanks for the video, it is great!! I wonder if you could recommend any books or articles about the verb "to be" and how it came to be the way it is today! :) Such an exciting story, but extremely complicated))
there was no indication that this video would have violent content and I was watching it with my son when an image of a guy having his head split open popped up
Meneer Dr. Porck, how do we say "What time is it?" in Anglo-Saxon and in Early Modern English? Do you think "Hū lāt is hit?" and "How late is't?" respectively? Ik ben nieuwsgierig. Dank U, meneer. (Groetjes uit Djakarta, Indonesië)
When I learned some Old English a few years ago I could not grasp how they didn't have a future tense. Apparently they use the present tense for the future tense and the present tense. This left me wondering - how do you tell if a present tense sentence in Old English is referring to the present or the future?
It's difficult in Germanic languages to see the gender of a word for there are no endings indicating it, you got to learn them instead,as far as I know. For fun: I have the strong tendency to make "Leerningknechtes " from leorningenihtas".
Hi!!!! I'm an English teacher from Spain and I have just landed on your fantastic video about Old English verbs while searching a good English > Old English dictionary. Could you please recommend me one? Thank you so much! :*
"let's conclude"
*title card: Conclusion"
"great, now that we've concluded"
These are great! Nice graphics, clear teaching, really well-organized. I'm in my first semester of Old English at school. Hope you keep making more!
Do you know OE now
Where are the other videos you have promised!! 😭😨
He disappeared and there aren’t many resources about old English
@@maaz87 What if he disappeared to find us more Old English resources. ❤️
@@maaz87there's books.
I love the clear description of the subjunctive in modern English. Spanish uses the subjunctive as well and Spanish students say all the time how great it is that English doesn't have that sort of thing. LOL!!! I try to explain but since it is so rarely used it's hard to get them to understand the rule. In Spanish, was = fue. But, "if I were a rich man" = si yo fuera un hombre rico. The difference is in "fue" and "fuera" where fue is the past tense and fuera is the subjunctive.
More please! These are fascinating and informative.
please provide more videos! your students need them!
Exellent ponunciation of Anglo-Saxon.
Brilliantly informative video! I want to make a few points:
It is important to remember that "Old English" was not internally static on grammar and phonology. It's kind of like how there wasn't suddenly a load of frications of stops, monophthongisations, and vowel phoneme convergences in Greek the moment Alexander the Great died, but the massive pronunciation change (mostly bad, if you ask me) that is called "Koine Greek phonology" happened gradually, over around 600 years. Old English didn't suddenly and exactly become Middle English as soon as Duke William of Normandy was crowned King William of England on 25/12/1066. While someone probably ought to learn about the extensively morphological case system if they're serious about learning Old English, they should probably also be aware that it was already mostly degraded before interference by Old French and Anglo-Norman dealt it the final blow, having suffered interference by Old Norse (due to a desire for ON-OE mutual intelligibility in the Danelaw) and redundancy through non-phonemic laxing.
Until relatively recently, I was under the impression that, while the case system was extensively declensional, the verb system wasn't much more conjugational than in Modern English, but then I read that it was. This video confirms my suspicion that it still wasn't as conjugational as Latin or even as Spanish. The 1st and 3rd person singular morphological equivalence in past tense, however, _does_ remind me of the same deal in Spanish's imperfect tense and in Spanish's conditional aspect.
Now, I want to discuss mood and tense. You said that Old English only has 2 tenses while Latin has 6, and that Modern English doesn't use the subjunctive mood very much. This is true if you only count morphological difference as different tense or mood. I don't, and I believe most don't. As you point out, participles in OE can take auxiliary verbs like to be and to have. These would standardly form progressive/continuous and perfect tenses, would they not? And Modern English, as you point out, doesn't have much morphological subjunctive mood. But much subjunctive mood, it still has. It's just that it's usually not conveyed by inflection but just using adverbs like "perhaps" and aux modal verbs like "may" and "might", as well as indirect-statement verbs like to doubt and to wish, as well as the "let [accusative subject]" construct (for the jussive subjunctive).
Still waiting on more videos.
Your videos are very helpful, so glad I found them Thank you!
Excellent video.
Excellent class! At first I was afraid I wouldn't be able to benefit from the charts due to the tiny letters - they're unfeasible to my poor eyesight - but when you started showing each item with bigger letters I was relieved:-) Thank you so much,I've subscribed to the channel giving the due thumbs up and sharing this awesome video!
Your videos are very helpful, thank you!!
Oh no! I’ve come to the end! Will there be more of these?
Thank you so much for this great and clear explatations. You are a life saver!
Thanks so much it helped me a lot
Interesting tidbit on your accent. Your English is so good that I assumed that you are English. But there was something unusual about your accent: it is intermittently rhotic. I looked at the description and saw that you are Dutch.
Great explanation!
Any chance of the second film on verbs?
Will the other videos ever come out? they were so helpful!
This is excellent! Are there more of these? You mention in several videos, that you plan to dive more deeply into certain topics (such as i-mutation). Are those available anywhere? Even for purchase or download?
Dankie vir jou videos. Ek het baie geleer. Jy is 'n goed onderwyser.
Dit is maar nie Afrikaans nie, geloof my, myn vriend!
Thanks for the video, it is great!! I wonder if you could recommend any books or articles about the verb "to be" and how it came to be the way it is today! :) Such an exciting story, but extremely complicated))
I hope this video hepls me with my english
Dank voor deze interessante én leerzame videos!!
Jij bent de beste! Fantastisch! Jaa😁👍👏!
hi,it is very useful video , but l don't understand why irregular verbs forms are different, how language change influenced to the irregular verbs
there was no indication that this video would have violent content and I was watching it with my son when an image of a guy having his head split open popped up
Very nice
Thank youuuuuu 🍒🍧🌹
Thank YOUUU!!!
Meneer Dr. Porck, how do we say "What time is it?" in Anglo-Saxon and in Early Modern English? Do you think "Hū lāt is hit?" and "How late is't?" respectively? Ik ben nieuwsgierig. Dank U, meneer. (Groetjes uit Djakarta, Indonesië)
When I learned some Old English a few years ago I could not grasp how they didn't have a future tense. Apparently they use the present tense for the future tense and the present tense. This left me wondering - how do you tell if a present tense sentence in Old English is referring to the present or the future?
Either from the context or because they use an auxiliary verb!
It's difficult in Germanic languages to see the gender of a word for there are no endings indicating it, you got to learn them instead,as far as I know.
For fun: I have the strong tendency to make "Leerningknechtes " from leorningenihtas".
Hi!!!! I'm an English teacher from Spain and I have just landed on your fantastic video about Old English verbs while searching a good English > Old English dictionary. Could you please recommend me one? Thank you so much! :*
Mar Giménez Santamaría The Dictionary of Old English (the DOE for short) maybe a good Old English dictionary.
I always use the Thesaurus of Old English for this! Just google and you'll find it - freely accessible thanks to the University of Glasgow
You keep using the West Saxon pronunciations of the "C" it's meant to sound like a "K "in the Anglian dialects.
#weak_verb #strong_verb #germanic_strong_verb #germanic_weak_verb #irregular_verb #germanic_irregular_verb
1:43 *hælþ
2:10 *hælaþ
Excellent! 😂
#ablaut #germanic_ablaut
Can you help explain the, I guess, umlaut of some strong verbs? Like how ‘Ic stele’ becomes ‘Þū stilst’.
Ma non pensavo fosse inglese antico
Leorningcnihtas
Learning knights?
I'm knight lol
Sarebbe un peccato se questo video non mi aiutasse con il mio inglese
DIO **************************
Why do you keep comparing Angle to Dutch, that is not helpful.
god with a capital "G"? Hmm, you lost my vote.
Post-modernism shot itself in the head over 40 years ago.